HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer
Theorem List (p. 18 of 424)
< Previous  Next >
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version.

Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  MPE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Color key:    Metamath Proof Explorer  Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27745)
  Hilbert Space Explorer  Hilbert Space Explorer
(27746-29270)
  Users' Mathboxes  Users' Mathboxes
(29271-42316)
 

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 1701-1800   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
Theoremstoic4b 1701 Stoic logic Thema 4 version b. This is version b, which is with the phrase "or both". See stoic4a 1700 for more information. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.)
((𝜑𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   (((𝜒𝜑𝜓) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)       ((𝜑𝜓𝜃) → 𝜏)
 
1.4  Predicate calculus with equality: Tarski's system S2 (1 rule, 6 schemes)

Here we extend the language of wffs with predicate calculus, which allows us to talk about individual objects in a domain of discussion (which for us will be the universe of all sets, so we call them "setvar variables") and make true/false statements about predicates, which are relationships between objects, such as whether or not two objects are equal. In addition, we introduce universal quantification ("for all", e.g. ax-4 1735) in order to make statements about whether a wff holds for every object in the domain of discussion. Later we introduce existential quantification ("there exists", df-ex 1703) which is defined in terms of universal quantification.

Our axioms are really axiom schemes, and our wff and setvar variables are metavariables ranging over expressions in an underlying "object language." This is explained here: mmset.html#axiomnote.

Our axiom system starts with the predicate calculus axiom schemes system S2 of Tarski defined in his 1965 paper, "A Simplified Formalization of Predicate Logic with Identity" [Tarski]. System S2 is defined in the last paragraph on p. 77, and repeated on p. 81 of [KalishMontague]. We do not include scheme B5 (our sp 2051) of system S2 since [KalishMontague] shows it to be logically redundant (Lemma 9, p. 87, which we prove as theorem spw 1965 below).

Theorem spw 1965 can be used to prove any instance of sp 2051 having mutually distinct setvar variables and no wff metavariables. However, it seems that sp 2051 in its general form cannot be derived from only Tarski's schemes. We do not include B5 i.e. sp 2051 as part of what we call "Tarski's system" because we want it to be the smallest set of axioms that is logically complete with no redundancies. We later prove sp 2051 as theorem axc5 33997 using the auxiliary axiom schemes that make our system metalogically complete.

Our version of Tarski's system S2 consists of propositional calculus (ax-mp 5, ax-1 6, ax-2 7, ax-3 8) plus ax-gen 1720, ax-4 1735, ax-5 1837, ax-6 1886, ax-7 1933, ax-8 1990, and ax-9 1997. The last three are equality axioms that represent three sub-schemes of Tarski's scheme B8. Due to its side-condition ("where 𝜑 is an atomic formula and 𝜓 is obtained by replacing an occurrence of the variable 𝑥 by the variable 𝑦"), we cannot represent his B8 directly without greatly complicating our scheme language, but the simpler schemes ax-7 1933, ax-8 1990, and ax-9 1997 are sufficient for set theory and much easier to work with.

Tarski's system is exactly equivalent to the traditional axiom system in most logic textbooks but has the advantage of being easy to manipulate with a computer program, and its simpler metalogic (with no built-in notions of "free variable" and "proper substitution") is arguably easier for a non-logician human to follow step by step in a proof (where "follow" means being able to identify the substitutions that were made, without necessarily a higher-level understanding). In particular, it is logically complete in that it can derive all possible object-language theorems of predicate calculus with equality, i.e. the same theorems as the traditional system can derive.

However, for efficiency (and indeed a key feature that makes Metamath successful), our system is designed to derive reusable theorem schemes (rather than object-language theorems) from other schemes. From this "metalogical" point of view, Tarski's S2 is not complete. For example, we cannot derive scheme sp 2051, even though (using spw 1965) we can derive all instances of it that don't involve wff metavariables or bundled setvar variables. (Two setvar variables are "bundled" if they can be substituted with the same setvar variable i.e. do not have a $d distinct variable proviso.) Later we will introduce auxiliary axiom schemes ax-10 2017, ax-11 2032, ax-12 2045, and ax-13 2244 that are metatheorems of Tarski's system (i.e. are logically redundant) but which give our system the property of "scheme completeness," allowing us to prove directly (instead of, say, by induction on formula length) all possible schemes that can be expressed in our language.

 
1.4.1  Universal quantifier (continued); define "exists" and "not free"

The universal quantifier was introduced above in wal 1479 for use by df-tru 1484. See the comments in that section. In this section, we continue with the first "real" use of it.

 
1.4.1.1  Existential quantifier
 
Syntaxwex 1702 Extend wff definition to include the existential quantifier ("there exists").
wff 𝑥𝜑
 
Definitiondf-ex 1703 Define existential quantification. 𝑥𝜑 means "there exists at least one set 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true." Definition of [Margaris] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.)
(∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
 
Theoremalnex 1704 Theorem 19.7 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
(∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑)
 
Theoremeximal 1705 A utility theorem. An interesting case is when the same formula is substituted for both 𝜑 and 𝜓, since then both implications express a type of non-freeness. See also alimex 1756. (Contributed by BJ, 12-May-2019.)
((∃𝑥𝜑𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
 
1.4.1.2  Non-freeness predicate
 
Syntaxwnf 1706 Extend wff definition to include the not-free predicate.
wff 𝑥𝜑
 
SyntaxwnfOLD 1707 Extend wff definition to include the old not-free predicate. Obsolete as of 16-Sep-2021. (New usage is discouraged.)
wff 𝑥𝜑
 
Definitiondf-nf 1708 Define the not-free predicate for wffs. This is read "𝑥 is not free in 𝜑". Not-free means that the value of 𝑥 cannot affect the value of 𝜑, e.g., any occurrence of 𝑥 in 𝜑 is effectively bound by a "for all" or something that expands to one (such as "there exists"). In particular, substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect its value (sbf 2378). An example of where this is used is stdpc5 2074. See nf5 2114 for an alternate definition which involves nested quantifiers on the same variable.

Not-free is a commonly used constraint, so it is useful to have a notation for it. Surprisingly, there is no common formal notation for it, so here we devise one. Our definition lets us work with the not-free notion within the logic itself rather than as a metalogical side condition.

To be precise, our definition really means "effectively not free," because it is slightly less restrictive than the usual textbook definition for not-free (which only considers syntactic freedom). For example, 𝑥 is effectively not free in the formula 𝑥 = 𝑥 (see nfequid 1938), even though 𝑥 would be considered free in the usual textbook definition, because the value of 𝑥 in the formula 𝑥 = 𝑥 cannot affect the truth of that formula (and thus substitutions will not change the result).

This definition of not-free tightly ties to the quantifier 𝑥. At this state (no axioms restricting quantifiers yet) 'non-free' appears quite arbitrary. Its intended semantics expresses single-valuedness (constness) across a parameter, but is only evolved as much as later axioms assign properties to quantifiers. It seems the definition here is best suited in situations, where axioms are only partially in effect. In particular, this definition more easily carries over to other logic models with weaker axiomization.

The reverse implication of the definiens (the right hand side of the biconditional) always holds, see 19.2 1890.

This predicate only applies to wffs. See df-nfc 2751 for a not-free predicate for class variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) Converted to definition. (Revised by BJ, 6-May-2019.)

(Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
 
Theoremnf2 1709 Alternate definition of non-freeness. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Sep-2021.)
(Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑))
 
Theoremnf3 1710 Alternate definition of non-freeness. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Sep-2021.)
(Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
 
Theoremnf4 1711 Alternate definition of non-freeness. This definition uses only primitive symbols. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Sep-2021.)
(Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
 
Theoremnfi 1712 Deduce that 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑 from the definition. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 15-Sep-2021.)
(∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)       𝑥𝜑
 
Theoremnfri 1713 Consequence of the definition of not-free. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2021.)
𝑥𝜑       (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
 
Theoremnfd 1714 Deduce that 𝑥 is not free in 𝜓 in a context. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2021.)
(𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))       (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
 
Theoremnfrd 1715 Consequence of the definition of not-free in a context. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 15-Oct-2021.)
(𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)       (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
 
Theoremnftht 1716 Closed form of nfth 1725. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 19-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Sep-2021.)
(∀𝑥𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)
 
Theoremnfntht 1717 Closed form of nfnth 1726. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Sep-2021.)
(¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)
 
Theoremnfntht2 1718 Closed form of nfnth 1726. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Sep-2021.)
(∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)
 
Definitiondf-nfOLD 1719 Obsolete definition replaced by nf5 2114 as of 3-Oct-2021. This definition is less suitable than df-nf 1708 when ax-10 2017 and ax-12 2045 are not in effect. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
 
1.4.2  Rule scheme ax-gen (Generalization)
 
Axiomax-gen 1720 Rule of Generalization. The postulated inference rule of predicate calculus. See e.g. Rule 2 of [Hamilton] p. 74. This rule says that if something is unconditionally true, then it is true for all values of a variable. For example, if we have proved 𝑥 = 𝑥, we can conclude 𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥 or even 𝑦𝑥 = 𝑥. Theorem allt 32375 shows the special case 𝑥. Theorem spi 2052 shows we can go the other way also: in other words we can add or remove universal quantifiers from the beginning of any theorem as required. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.)
𝜑       𝑥𝜑
 
Theoremgen2 1721 Generalization applied twice. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
𝜑       𝑥𝑦𝜑
 
Theoremmpg 1722 Modus ponens combined with generalization. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1994.)
(∀𝑥𝜑𝜓)    &   𝜑       𝜓
 
Theoremmpgbi 1723 Modus ponens on biconditional combined with generalization. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Stefan Allan, 28-Oct-2008.)
(∀𝑥𝜑𝜓)    &   𝜑       𝜓
 
Theoremmpgbir 1724 Modus ponens on biconditional combined with generalization. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Stefan Allan, 28-Oct-2008.)
(𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   𝜓       𝜑
 
Theoremnfth 1725 No variable is (effectively) free in a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) df-nf 1708 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 12-Sep-2021.)
𝜑       𝑥𝜑
 
Theoremnfnth 1726 No variable is (effectively) free in a non-theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.) df-nf 1708 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 12-Sep-2021.)
¬ 𝜑       𝑥𝜑
 
Theoremhbth 1727 No variable is (effectively) free in a theorem.

This and later "hypothesis-building" lemmas, with labels starting "hb...", allow us to construct proofs of formulas of the form (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) from smaller formulas of this form. These are useful for constructing hypotheses that state "𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝜑." (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1993.)

𝜑       (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
 
Theoremnftru 1728 The true constant has no free variables. (This can also be proven in one step with nfv 1841, but this proof does not use ax-5 1837.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
𝑥
 
Theoremnex 1729 Generalization rule for negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.)
¬ 𝜑        ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑
 
Theoremnffal 1730 The false constant has no free variables (see nftru 1728). (Contributed by BJ, 6-May-2019.)
𝑥
 
Theoremsptruw 1731 Version of sp 2051 when 𝜑 is true. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2017.)
𝜑       (∀𝑥𝜑𝜑)
 
TheoremnfiOLD 1732 Obsolete proof of nf5i 2022 as of 5-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)       𝑥𝜑
 
TheoremnfthOLD 1733 Obsolete proof of nfth 1725 as of 5-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
𝜑       𝑥𝜑
 
TheoremnfnthOLD 1734 Obsolete proof of nfnth 1726 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
¬ 𝜑       𝑥𝜑
 
1.4.3  Axiom scheme ax-4 (Quantified Implication)
 
Axiomax-4 1735 Axiom of Quantified Implication. Axiom C4 of [Monk2] p. 105 and Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is restated as alim 1736 for labeling consistency. It should be used only by alim 1736. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2008.) Use alim 1736 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
 
Theoremalim 1736 Restatement of Axiom ax-4 1735, for labeling consistency. It should be the only theorem using ax-4 1735. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
 
Theoremalimi 1737 Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-1993.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
 
Theorem2alimi 1738 Inference doubly quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∀𝑥𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑦𝜓)
 
Theoremala1 1739 Add an antecedent in a universally quantified formula. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
(∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜓𝜑))
 
Theoremal2im 1740 Closed form of al2imi 1741. Version of alim 1736 for a nested implication. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒)) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)))
 
Theoremal2imi 1741 Inference quantifying antecedent, nested antecedent, and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.)
(𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))
 
Theoremalanimi 1742 Variant of al2imi 1741 with conjunctive antecedent. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
((𝜑𝜓) → 𝜒)       ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥𝜒)
 
Theoremalimdh 1743 Deduction form of Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90, see alim 1736. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2002.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))
 
Theoremalbi 1744 Theorem 19.15 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-1993.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜓))
 
Theoremalbii 1745 Inference adding universal quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜓)
 
Theorem2albii 1746 Inference adding two universal quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∀𝑥𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦𝜓)
 
Theoremsylgt 1747 Closed form of sylg 1748. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2019.)
(∀𝑥(𝜓𝜒) → ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒)))
 
Theoremsylg 1748 A syllogism combined with generalization. Inference associated with sylgt 1747. General form of alrimih 1749. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2019.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   (𝜓𝜒)       (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒)
 
Theoremalrimih 1749 Inference form of Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.21 2073 and 19.21h 2119. Instance of sylg 1748. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-Mar-2021.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   (𝜑𝜓)       (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
 
Theoremhbxfrbi 1750 A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. See hbxfreq 2728 for equality version. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
(𝜑𝜓)    &   (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)       (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
 
Theoremalex 1751 Universal quantifier in terms of existential quantifier and negation. Theorem 19.6 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
(∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
 
Theoremexnal 1752 Theorem 19.14 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
(∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑)
 
Theorem2nalexn 1753 Part of theorem *11.5 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
(¬ ∀𝑥𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦 ¬ 𝜑)
 
Theorem2exnaln 1754 Theorem *11.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 160. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
(∃𝑥𝑦𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑦 ¬ 𝜑)
 
Theorem2nexaln 1755 Theorem *11.25 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 160. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
(¬ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦 ¬ 𝜑)
 
Theoremalimex 1756 A utility theorem. An interesting case is when the same formula is substituted for both 𝜑 and 𝜓, since then both implications express a type of non-freeness. See also eximal 1705. (Contributed by BJ, 12-May-2019.)
((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
 
Theoremaleximi 1757 A variant of al2imi 1741: instead of applying 𝑥 quantifiers to the final implication, replace them with 𝑥. A shorter proof is possible using nfa1 2026, sps 2053 and eximd 2083, but it depends on more axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 18-Aug-2019.)
(𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜒))
 
Theoremalexbii 1758 Biconditional form of aleximi 1757. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Nov-2020.)
(𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜒))
 
Theoremexim 1759 Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Jul-2014.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓))
 
Theoremeximi 1760 Inference adding existential quantifier to antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
 
Theorem2eximi 1761 Inference adding two existential quantifiers to antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∃𝑥𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝑦𝜓)
 
Theoremeximii 1762 Inference associated with eximi 1760. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Feb-2018.)
𝑥𝜑    &   (𝜑𝜓)       𝑥𝜓
 
Theoremexa1 1763 Add an antecedent in an existentially quantified formula. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
(∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜓𝜑))
 
Theorem19.38 1764 Theorem 19.38 of [Margaris] p. 90. The converse holds under non-freeness conditions, see 19.38a 1765 and 19.38b 1766. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) Allow a shortening of 19.21t 2071. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.)
((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓))
 
Theorem19.38a 1765 Under a non-freeness hypothesis, the implication 19.38 1764 can be strengthened to an equivalence. See also 19.38b 1766. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Nov-2021.)
(Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 → ((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓)))
 
Theorem19.38b 1766 Under a non-freeness hypothesis, the implication 19.38 1764 can be strengthened to an equivalence. See also 19.38a 1765. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Nov-2021.)
(Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → ((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓)))
 
Theoremimnang 1767 Quantified implication in terms of quantified negation of conjunction. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Jul-2021.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝜑𝜓))
 
Theoremalinexa 1768 A transformation of quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜑𝜓))
 
Theoremalexn 1769 A relationship between two quantifiers and negation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
(∀𝑥𝑦 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)
 
Theorem2exnexn 1770 Theorem *11.51 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Sep-2014.)
(∃𝑥𝑦𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑦 ¬ 𝜑)
 
Theoremexbi 1771 Theorem 19.18 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜓))
 
Theoremexbii 1772 Inference adding existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1994.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜓)
 
Theorem2exbii 1773 Inference adding two existential quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1995.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∃𝑥𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜓)
 
Theorem3exbii 1774 Inference adding three existential quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1995.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧𝜓)
 
Theoremnfbiit 1775 Equivalence theorem for the non-freeness predicate. Closed form of nfbii 1776. (Contributed by BJ, 6-May-2019.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓) → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓))
 
Theoremnfbii 1776 Equality theorem for the non-freeness predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) df-nf 1708 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 12-Sep-2021.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
 
Theoremnfxfr 1777 A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
(𝜑𝜓)    &   𝑥𝜓       𝑥𝜑
 
Theoremnfxfrd 1778 A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
(𝜑𝜓)    &   (𝜒 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)       (𝜒 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)
 
Theoremnfnbi 1779 A variable is non-free in a proposition if and only if it is so in its negation. (Contributed by BJ, 6-May-2019.)
(Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
 
Theoremnfnt 1780 If a variable is non-free in a proposition, then it is non-free in its negation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Dec-2017.) (Revised by BJ, 24-Jul-2019.) df-nf 1708 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Oct-2021.)
(Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
 
TheoremnfntOLDOLD 1781 Obsolete proof of nfnt 1780 as of 3-Nov-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Dec-2017.) (Revised by BJ, 24-Jul-2019.) df-nf 1708 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Oct-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
 
Theoremnfn 1782 Inference associated with nfnt 1780. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) df-nf 1708 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Sep-2021.)
𝑥𝜑       𝑥 ¬ 𝜑
 
Theoremnfnd 1783 Deduction associated with nfnt 1780. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
(𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)       (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)
 
Theoremexanali 1784 A transformation of quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Sep-2014.)
(∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓))
 
Theoremexancom 1785 Commutation of conjunction inside an existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
(∃𝑥(𝜑𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜓𝜑))
 
Theoremexan 1786 Place a conjunct in the scope of an existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Jan-2018.) Reduce axiom dependencies. (Revised by BJ, 7-Jul-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Oct-2021.)
(∃𝑥𝜑𝜓)       𝑥(𝜑𝜓)
 
TheoremexanOLD 1787 Obsolete proof of exan 1786 as of 8-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Jan-2018.) Reduce axiom dependencies. (Revised by BJ, 7-Jul-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(∃𝑥𝜑𝜓)       𝑥(𝜑𝜓)
 
Theoremalrimdh 1788 Deduction form of Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90, see 19.21 2073 and 19.21h 2119. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))
 
Theoremeximdh 1789 Deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1996.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜒))
 
Theoremnexdh 1790 Deduction for generalization rule for negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)       (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓)
 
Theoremalbidh 1791 Formula-building rule for universal quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜒))
 
Theoremexbidh 1792 Formula-building rule for existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜒))
 
Theoremexsimpl 1793 Simplification of an existentially quantified conjunction. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 25-Sep-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
(∃𝑥(𝜑𝜓) → ∃𝑥𝜑)
 
Theoremexsimpr 1794 Simplification of an existentially quantified conjunction. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 25-Sep-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
(∃𝑥(𝜑𝜓) → ∃𝑥𝜓)
 
Theorem19.40 1795 Theorem 19.40 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
(∃𝑥(𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓))
 
Theorem19.26 1796 Theorem 19.26 of [Margaris] p. 90. Also Theorem *10.22 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 147. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Jul-2014.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓))
 
Theorem19.26-2 1797 Theorem 19.26 1796 with two quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
(∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝑦𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝑦𝜓))
 
Theorem19.26-3an 1798 Theorem 19.26 1796 with triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
(∀𝑥(𝜑𝜓𝜒) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜒))
 
Theorem19.29 1799 Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90. See also 19.29r 1800. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.)
((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑𝜓))
 
Theorem19.29r 1800 Variation of 19.29 1799. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Nov-2020.)
((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑𝜓))
    < Previous  Next >

Page List
Jump to page: Contents  1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10700 108 10701-10800 109 10801-10900 110 10901-11000 111 11001-11100 112 11101-11200 113 11201-11300 114 11301-11400 115 11401-11500 116 11501-11600 117 11601-11700 118 11701-11800 119 11801-11900 120 11901-12000 121 12001-12100 122 12101-12200 123 12201-12300 124 12301-12400 125 12401-12500 126 12501-12600 127 12601-12700 128 12701-12800 129 12801-12900 130 12901-13000 131 13001-13100 132 13101-13200 133 13201-13300 134 13301-13400 135 13401-13500 136 13501-13600 137 13601-13700 138 13701-13800 139 13801-13900 140 13901-14000 141 14001-14100 142 14101-14200 143 14201-14300 144 14301-14400 145 14401-14500 146 14501-14600 147 14601-14700 148 14701-14800 149 14801-14900 150 14901-15000 151 15001-15100 152 15101-15200 153 15201-15300 154 15301-15400 155 15401-15500 156 15501-15600 157 15601-15700 158 15701-15800 159 15801-15900 160 15901-16000 161 16001-16100 162 16101-16200 163 16201-16300 164 16301-16400 165 16401-16500 166 16501-16600 167 16601-16700 168 16701-16800 169 16801-16900 170 16901-17000 171 17001-17100 172 17101-17200 173 17201-17300 174 17301-17400 175 17401-17500 176 17501-17600 177 17601-17700 178 17701-17800 179 17801-17900 180 17901-18000 181 18001-18100 182 18101-18200 183 18201-18300 184 18301-18400 185 18401-18500 186 18501-18600 187 18601-18700 188 18701-18800 189 18801-18900 190 18901-19000 191 19001-19100 192 19101-19200 193 19201-19300 194 19301-19400 195 19401-19500 196 19501-19600 197 19601-19700 198 19701-19800 199 19801-19900 200 19901-20000 201 20001-20100 202 20101-20200 203 20201-20300 204 20301-20400 205 20401-20500 206 20501-20600 207 20601-20700 208 20701-20800 209 20801-20900 210 20901-21000 211 21001-21100 212 21101-21200 213 21201-21300 214 21301-21400 215 21401-21500 216 21501-21600 217 21601-21700 218 21701-21800 219 21801-21900 220 21901-22000 221 22001-22100 222 22101-22200 223 22201-22300 224 22301-22400 225 22401-22500 226 22501-22600 227 22601-22700 228 22701-22800 229 22801-22900 230 22901-23000 231 23001-23100 232 23101-23200 233 23201-23300 234 23301-23400 235 23401-23500 236 23501-23600 237 23601-23700 238 23701-23800 239 23801-23900 240 23901-24000 241 24001-24100 242 24101-24200 243 24201-24300 244 24301-24400 245 24401-24500 246 24501-24600 247 24601-24700 248 24701-24800 249 24801-24900 250 24901-25000 251 25001-25100 252 25101-25200 253 25201-25300 254 25301-25400 255 25401-25500 256 25501-25600 257 25601-25700 258 25701-25800 259 25801-25900 260 25901-26000 261 26001-26100 262 26101-26200 263 26201-26300 264 26301-26400 265 26401-26500 266 26501-26600 267 26601-26700 268 26701-26800 269 26801-26900 270 26901-27000 271 27001-27100 272 27101-27200 273 27201-27300 274 27301-27400 275 27401-27500 276 27501-27600 277 27601-27700 278 27701-27800 279 27801-27900 280 27901-28000 281 28001-28100 282 28101-28200 283 28201-28300 284 28301-28400 285 28401-28500 286 28501-28600 287 28601-28700 288 28701-28800 289 28801-28900 290 28901-29000 291 29001-29100 292 29101-29200 293 29201-29300 294 29301-29400 295 29401-29500 296 29501-29600 297 29601-29700 298 29701-29800 299 29801-29900 300 29901-30000 301 30001-30100 302 30101-30200 303 30201-30300 304 30301-30400 305 30401-30500 306 30501-30600 307 30601-30700 308 30701-30800 309 30801-30900 310 30901-31000 311 31001-31100 312 31101-31200 313 31201-31300 314 31301-31400 315 31401-31500 316 31501-31600 317 31601-31700 318 31701-31800 319 31801-31900 320 31901-32000 321 32001-32100 322 32101-32200 323 32201-32300 324 32301-32400 325 32401-32500 326 32501-32600 327 32601-32700 328 32701-32800 329 32801-32900 330 32901-33000 331 33001-33100 332 33101-33200 333 33201-33300 334 33301-33400 335 33401-33500 336 33501-33600 337 33601-33700 338 33701-33800 339 33801-33900 340 33901-34000 341 34001-34100 342 34101-34200 343 34201-34300 344 34301-34400 345 34401-34500 346 34501-34600 347 34601-34700 348 34701-34800 349 34801-34900 350 34901-35000 351 35001-35100 352 35101-35200 353 35201-35300 354 35301-35400 355 35401-35500 356 35501-35600 357 35601-35700 358 35701-35800 359 35801-35900 360 35901-36000 361 36001-36100 362 36101-36200 363 36201-36300 364 36301-36400 365 36401-36500 366 36501-36600 367 36601-36700 368 36701-36800 369 36801-36900 370 36901-37000 371 37001-37100 372 37101-37200 373 37201-37300 374 37301-37400 375 37401-37500 376 37501-37600 377 37601-37700 378 37701-37800 379 37801-37900 380 37901-38000 381 38001-38100 382 38101-38200 383 38201-38300 384 38301-38400 385 38401-38500 386 38501-38600 387 38601-38700 388 38701-38800 389 38801-38900 390 38901-39000 391 39001-39100 392 39101-39200 393 39201-39300 394 39301-39400 395 39401-39500 396 39501-39600 397 39601-39700 398 39701-39800 399 39801-39900 400 39901-40000 401 40001-40100 402 40101-40200 403 40201-40300 404 40301-40400 405 40401-40500 406 40501-40600 407 40601-40700 408 40701-40800 409 40801-40900 410 40901-41000 411 41001-41100 412 41101-41200 413 41201-41300 414 41301-41400 415 41401-41500 416 41501-41600 417 41601-41700 418 41701-41800 419 41801-41900 420 41901-42000 421 42001-42100 422 42101-42200 423 42201-42300 424 42301-42316
  Copyright terms: Public domain < Previous  Next >