Theorem 2oppccomf 17740

Description: The double opposite category has the same composition as the original category. Intended for use with property lemmas such as monpropd 17753. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oppcbas.1	⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2oppccomf	⊢ (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘(oppCat‘𝑂))

Proof of Theorem 2oppccomf

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oppcbas.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)
2		eqid 2726	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐶)
3	1, 2	oppcbas 17732	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝑂)
4		eqid 2726	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (comp‘𝑂) = (comp‘𝑂)
5		eqid 2726	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (oppCat‘𝑂) = (oppCat‘𝑂)
6		simpr1 1191	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
7		simpr2 1192	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
8		simpr3 1193	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))
9	3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8	oppcco 17731	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘(oppCat‘𝑂))𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑓(⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝑂)𝑥)𝑔))
10		eqid 2726	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐶)
11	2, 10, 1, 8, 7, 6	oppcco 17731	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → (𝑓(⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝑂)𝑥)𝑔) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓))
12	9, 11	eqtr2d 2767	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘(oppCat‘𝑂))𝑧)𝑓))
13	12	ralrimivw 3140	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘(oppCat‘𝑂))𝑧)𝑓))
14	13	ralrimivw 3140	. . . 4 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘(oppCat‘𝑂))𝑧)𝑓))
15	14	ralrimivvva 3194	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘(oppCat‘𝑂))𝑧)𝑓))
16		eqid 2726	. . . 4 ⊢ (comp‘(oppCat‘𝑂)) = (comp‘(oppCat‘𝑂))
17		eqid 2726	. . . 4 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐶)
18		eqidd 2727	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐶))
19	1, 2	2oppcbas 17738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘(oppCat‘𝑂))
20	19	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘(oppCat‘𝑂)))
21	1	2oppchomf 17739	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘(oppCat‘𝑂))
22	21	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘(oppCat‘𝑂)))
23	10, 16, 17, 18, 20, 22	comfeq 17719	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → ((compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘(oppCat‘𝑂)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(comp‘(oppCat‘𝑂))𝑧)𝑓)))
24	15, 23	mpbird 256	. 2 ⊢ (⊤ → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘(oppCat‘𝑂)))
25	24	mptru 1541	1 ⊢ (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘(oppCat‘𝑂))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 394   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1534  ⊤wtru 1535   ∈ wcel 2099  ∀wral 3051  ⟨cop 4639  ‘cfv 6554  (class class class)co 7424  Basecbs 17213  Hom chom 17277  compcco 17278  Hom_f chomf 17679  comp_fccomf 17680  oppCatcoppc 17724

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2697  ax-rep 5290  ax-sep 5304  ax-nul 5311  ax-pow 5369  ax-pr 5433  ax-un 7746  ax-cnex 11214  ax-resscn 11215  ax-1cn 11216  ax-icn 11217  ax-addcl 11218  ax-addrcl 11219  ax-mulcl 11220  ax-mulrcl 11221  ax-mulcom 11222  ax-addass 11223  ax-mulass 11224  ax-distr 11225  ax-i2m1 11226  ax-1ne0 11227  ax-1rid 11228  ax-rnegex 11229  ax-rrecex 11230  ax-cnre 11231  ax-pre-lttri 11232  ax-pre-lttrn 11233  ax-pre-ltadd 11234  ax-pre-mulgt0 11235

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-mo 2529  df-eu 2558  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2931  df-nel 3037  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-reu 3365  df-rab 3420  df-v 3464  df-sbc 3777  df-csb 3893  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-pss 3967  df-nul 4326  df-if 4534  df-pw 4609  df-sn 4634  df-pr 4636  df-op 4640  df-uni 4914  df-iun 5003  df-br 5154  df-opab 5216  df-mpt 5237  df-tr 5271  df-id 5580  df-eprel 5586  df-po 5594  df-so 5595  df-fr 5637  df-we 5639  df-xp 5688  df-rel 5689  df-cnv 5690  df-co 5691  df-dm 5692  df-rn 5693  df-res 5694  df-ima 5695  df-pred 6312  df-ord 6379  df-on 6380  df-lim 6381  df-suc 6382  df-iota 6506  df-fun 6556  df-fn 6557  df-f 6558  df-f1 6559  df-fo 6560  df-f1o 6561  df-fv 6562  df-riota 7380  df-ov 7427  df-oprab 7428  df-mpo 7429  df-om 7877  df-1st 8003  df-2nd 8004  df-tpos 8241  df-frecs 8296  df-wrecs 8327  df-recs 8401  df-rdg 8440  df-er 8734  df-en 8975  df-dom 8976  df-sdom 8977  df-pnf 11300  df-mnf 11301  df-xr 11302  df-ltxr 11303  df-le 11304  df-sub 11496  df-neg 11497  df-nn 12265  df-2 12327  df-3 12328  df-4 12329  df-5 12330  df-6 12331  df-7 12332  df-8 12333  df-9 12334  df-n0 12525  df-z 12611  df-dec 12730  df-sets 17166  df-slot 17184  df-ndx 17196  df-base 17214  df-hom 17290  df-cco 17291  df-homf 17683  df-comf 17684  df-oppc 17725

This theorem is referenced by:  oppcepi  17755  oppchofcl  18285  oppcyon  18294  oyoncl  18295