| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > lvecvscan | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Cancellation law for scalar multiplication. (hvmulcan 31667 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2014.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lvecmulcan.v | ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) |
| lvecmulcan.s | ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) |
| lvecmulcan.f | ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) |
| lvecmulcan.k | ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) |
| lvecmulcan.o | ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) |
| lvecmulcan.w | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) |
| lvecmulcan.a | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾) |
| lvecmulcan.x | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) |
| lvecmulcan.y | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) |
| lvecmulcan.n | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0 ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lvecvscan | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝑋) = (𝐴 · 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | lvecmulcan.n | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0 ) | |
| 2 | df-ne 2957 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 = 0 ) | |
| 3 | biorf 950 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 = 0 → ((𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐴 = 0 ∨ (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊)))) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | sylbi 220 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0 → ((𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐴 = 0 ∨ (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊)))) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | syl 18 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐴 = 0 ∨ (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊)))) |
| 6 | lvecmulcan.w | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) | |
| 7 | lveclmod 21374 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LVec → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| 9 | lvecmulcan.x | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) | |
| 10 | lvecmulcan.y | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) | |
| 11 | lvecmulcan.v | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) | |
| 12 | eqid 2761 | . . . 4 ⊢ (0g‘𝑊) = (0g‘𝑊) | |
| 13 | eqid 2761 | . . . 4 ⊢ (-g‘𝑊) = (-g‘𝑊) | |
| 14 | 11, 12, 13 | lmodsubeq0 21189 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
| 15 | 8, 9, 10, 14 | syl3anc 1398 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
| 16 | lvecmulcan.s | . . . . 5 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) | |
| 17 | lvecmulcan.f | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) | |
| 18 | lvecmulcan.k | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) | |
| 19 | lvecmulcan.a | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾) | |
| 20 | 11, 16, 17, 18, 13, 8, 19, 9, 10 | lmodsubdi 21187 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌)) = ((𝐴 · 𝑋)(-g‘𝑊)(𝐴 · 𝑌))) |
| 21 | 20 | eqeq1d 2763 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌)) = (0g‘𝑊) ↔ ((𝐴 · 𝑋)(-g‘𝑊)(𝐴 · 𝑌)) = (0g‘𝑊))) |
| 22 | lvecmulcan.o | . . . 4 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) | |
| 23 | 11, 13 | lmodvsubcl 21175 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) |
| 24 | 8, 9, 10, 23 | syl3anc 1398 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) |
| 25 | 11, 16, 17, 18, 22, 12, 6, 19, 24 | lvecvs0or 21379 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌)) = (0g‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐴 = 0 ∨ (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊)))) |
| 26 | 11, 17, 16, 18 | lmodvscl 21146 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) |
| 27 | 8, 19, 9, 26 | syl3anc 1398 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) |
| 28 | 11, 17, 16, 18 | lmodvscl 21146 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) |
| 29 | 8, 19, 10, 28 | syl3anc 1398 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) |
| 30 | 11, 12, 13 | lmodsubeq0 21189 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) → (((𝐴 · 𝑋)(-g‘𝑊)(𝐴 · 𝑌)) = (0g‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐴 · 𝑋) = (𝐴 · 𝑌))) |
| 31 | 8, 27, 29, 30 | syl3anc 1398 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 · 𝑋)(-g‘𝑊)(𝐴 · 𝑌)) = (0g‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐴 · 𝑋) = (𝐴 · 𝑌))) |
| 32 | 21, 25, 31 | 3bitr3d 312 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 = 0 ∨ (𝑋(-g‘𝑊)𝑌) = (0g‘𝑊)) ↔ (𝐴 · 𝑋) = (𝐴 · 𝑌))) |
| 33 | 5, 15, 32 | 3bitr3rd 313 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝑋) = (𝐴 · 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∨ wo 861 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 ≠ wne 2956 ‘cfv 6537 (class class class)co 7418 Basecbs 17380 Scalarcsca 17424 ·𝑠 cvsca 17425 0gc0g 17603 -gcsg 19139 LModclmod 21128 LVecclvec 21370 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2733 ax-rep 5232 ax-sep 5249 ax-nul 5260 ax-pow 5327 ax-pr 5391 ax-un 7749 ax-cnex 11249 ax-resscn 11250 ax-1cn 11251 ax-icn 11252 ax-addcl 11253 ax-addrcl 11254 ax-mulcl 11255 ax-mulrcl 11256 ax-mulcom 11257 ax-addass 11258 ax-mulass 11259 ax-distr 11260 ax-i2m1 11261 ax-1ne0 11262 ax-1rid 11263 ax-rnegex 11264 ax-rrecex 11265 ax-cnre 11266 ax-pre-lttri 11267 ax-pre-lttrn 11268 ax-pre-ltadd 11269 ax-pre-mulgt0 11270 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2565 df-eu 2595 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-ne 2957 df-nel 3063 df-ral 3078 df-rex 3088 df-rmo 3366 df-reu 3367 df-rab 3414 df-v 3453 df-sbc 3740 df-csb 3848 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-in 3906 df-ss 3916 df-pss 3919 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-iun 4953 df-br 5104 df-opab 5168 df-mpt 5187 df-tr 5213 df-id 5546 df-eprel 5551 df-po 5559 df-so 5560 df-fr 5604 df-we 5606 df-xp 5657 df-rel 5658 df-cnv 5659 df-co 5660 df-dm 5661 df-rn 5662 df-res 5663 df-ima 5664 df-pred 6303 df-ord 6364 df-on 6365 df-lim 6366 df-suc 6367 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fn 6540 df-f 6541 df-f1 6542 df-fo 6543 df-f1o 6544 df-fv 6545 df-riota 7375 df-ov 7421 df-oprab 7422 df-mpo 7423 df-om 7876 df-1st 7999 df-2nd 8000 df-tpos 8236 df-frecs 8292 df-wrecs 8323 df-recs 8372 df-rdg 8411 df-er 8710 df-en 8967 df-dom 8968 df-sdom 8969 df-pnf 11338 df-mnf 11339 df-xr 11340 df-ltxr 11341 df-le 11342 df-sub 11536 df-neg 11537 df-nn 12329 df-2 12398 df-3 12399 df-sets 17335 df-slot 17353 df-ndx 17365 df-base 17381 df-ress 17402 df-plusg 17434 df-mulr 17435 df-0g 17605 df-mgm 18809 df-sgrp 18901 df-mnd 18917 df-grp 19140 df-minusg 19141 df-sbg 19142 df-cmn 19989 df-abl 19990 df-mgp 20354 df-rng 20368 df-ur 20401 df-ring 20454 df-oppr 20560 df-dvdsr 20580 df-unit 20581 df-invr 20611 df-drng 20975 df-lmod 21130 df-lvec 21371 |
| This theorem is used by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |