ruclem11 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ruclem11		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ruclem11 16302

Description: Lemma for ruc 16305. Closure lemmas for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
ruc.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
ruc.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
ruc.4	⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
ruc.5	⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ruclem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑚,𝑦 𝑧,𝐶 𝑧,𝑚,𝐹,𝑥,𝑦 𝑚,𝐺,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝜑,𝑧 𝑧,𝐷 Allowed substitution hints: 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐷(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚)

Proof of Theorem ruclem11 Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ruc.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
2		ruc.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
3		ruc.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
4		ruc.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)
5	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem6 16297	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ))
6		1stcof 8014	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
8	7	frnd 6714	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ)
9	7	fdmd 6716	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ℕ₀)
10		0nn0 12525	. . . . 5 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℕ₀
11		ne0i 4293	. . . . 5 ⊢ (0 ∈ ℕ₀ → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
12	10, 11	mp1i 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
13	9, 12	eqnetrd 3024	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
14		dm0rn0 5913	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅)
15	14	necon3bii 3009	. . 3 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
16	13, 15	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
17		fvco3 6981	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
18	5, 17	sylan 591	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
19	1	adantr 485	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
20	2	adantr 485	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
21		simpr 489	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀)
22	10	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 0 ∈ ℕ₀)
23	19, 20, 3, 4, 21, 22	ruclem10 16301	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)))
24	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem4 16296	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘0) = ⟨0, 1⟩)
25	24	fveq2d 6885	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩))
26		c0ex 11206	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
27		1ex 11209	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 1 ∈ V
28	26, 27	op2nd 7993	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩) = 1
29	25, 28	eqtrdi 2813	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
30	29	adantr 485	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
31	23, 30	breqtrd 5136	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1)
32	5	ffvelcdmda 7079	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ))
33		xp1st 8016	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
34	32, 33	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
35		1re 11214	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
36		ltle 11304	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
37	34, 35, 36	sylancl 597	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
38	31, 37	mpd 16	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1)
39	18, 38	eqbrtrd 5132	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
40	39	ralrimiva 3156	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
41	7	ffnd 6706	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀)
42		breq1 5111	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) → (𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
43	42	ralrn 7083	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀ → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
44	41, 43	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
45	40, 44	mpbird 260	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1)
46	8, 16, 45	3jca 1145	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 400 ∧ w3a 1102 = wceq 1569 ∈ wcel 2142 ≠ wne 2957 ∀wral 3078 ⦋csb 3852 ∪ cun 3902 ⊆ wss 3904 ∅c0 4285 ifcif 4486 {csn 4588 ⟨cop 4594 class class class wbr 5108 × cxp 5658 dom cdm 5660 ran crn 5661 ∘ ccom 5664 Fn wfn 6531 ⟶wf 6532 ‘cfv 6536 (class class class)co 7412 ∈ cmpo 7414 1^st c1st 7982 2^nd c2nd 7983 ℝcr 11105 0cc0 11106 1c1 11107 + caddc 11109 < clt 11249 ≤ cle 11250 / cdiv 11877 ℕcn 12239 2c2 12301 ℕ₀cn0 12510 seqcseq 14044

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1824 ax-4 1838 ax-5 1939 ax-6 1996 ax-7 2037 ax-8 2144 ax-9 2152 ax-10 2175 ax-11 2191 ax-12 2212 ax-ext 2734 ax-sep 5256 ax-nul 5268 ax-pow 5335 ax-pr 5403 ax-un 7734 ax-cnex 11162 ax-resscn 11163 ax-1cn 11164 ax-icn 11165 ax-addcl 11166 ax-addrcl 11167 ax-mulcl 11168 ax-mulrcl 11169 ax-mulcom 11170 ax-addass 11171 ax-mulass 11172 ax-distr 11173 ax-i2m1 11174 ax-1ne0 11175 ax-1rid 11176 ax-rnegex 11177 ax-rrecex 11178 ax-cnre 11179 ax-pre-lttri 11180 ax-pre-lttrn 11181 ax-pre-ltadd 11182 ax-pre-mulgt0 11183

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3or 1103 df-3an 1104 df-tru 1572 df-fal 1582 df-ex 1809 df-nf 1813 df-sb 2096 df-mo 2566 df-eu 2596 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-nfc 2911 df-ne 2958 df-nel 3064 df-ral 3079 df-rex 3089 df-rmo 3368 df-reu 3369 df-rab 3416 df-v 3456 df-sbc 3744 df-csb 3853 df-dif 3907 df-un 3909 df-in 3911 df-ss 3921 df-pss 3924 df-nul 4286 df-if 4487 df-pw 4563 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4595 df-uni 4872 df-iun 4957 df-br 5109 df-opab 5173 df-mpt 5192 df-tr 5218 df-id 5555 df-eprel 5560 df-po 5568 df-so 5569 df-fr 5613 df-we 5615 df-xp 5666 df-rel 5667 df-cnv 5668 df-co 5669 df-dm 5670 df-rn 5671 df-res 5672 df-ima 5673 df-pred 6302 df-ord 6363 df-on 6364 df-lim 6365 df-suc 6366 df-iota 6492 df-fun 6538 df-fn 6539 df-f 6540 df-f1 6541 df-fo 6542 df-f1o 6543 df-fv 6544 df-riota 7369 df-ov 7415 df-oprab 7416 df-mpo 7417 df-om 7861 df-1st 7984 df-2nd 7985 df-frecs 8276 df-wrecs 8307 df-recs 8356 df-rdg 8395 df-er 8692 df-en 8942 df-dom 8943 df-sdom 8944 df-pnf 11251 df-mnf 11252 df-xr 11253 df-ltxr 11254 df-le 11255 df-sub 11449 df-neg 11450 df-div 11878 df-nn 12240 df-2 12309 df-n0 12511 df-z 12598 df-uz 12869 df-fz 13542 df-seq 14045

This theorem is used by: ruclem12 16303

W3C validator