ruclem11 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ruclem11		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ruclem11 16361

Description: Lemma for ruc 16364. Closure lemmas for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
ruc.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
ruc.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
ruc.4	⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
ruc.5	⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ruclem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑚,𝑦 𝑧,𝐶 𝑧,𝑚,𝐹,𝑥,𝑦 𝑚,𝐺,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝜑,𝑧 𝑧,𝐷 Allowed substitution hints: 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐷(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚)

Proof of Theorem ruclem11 Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ruc.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
2		ruc.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
3		ruc.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
4		ruc.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)
5	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem6 16356	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ))
6		1stcof 8015	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
8	7	frnd 6707	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ)
9	7	fdmd 6709	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ℕ₀)
10		0nn0 12576	. . . . 5 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℕ₀
11		ne0i 4287	. . . . 5 ⊢ (0 ∈ ℕ₀ → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
12	10, 11	mp1i 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
13	9, 12	eqnetrd 3022	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
14		dm0rn0 5903	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅)
15	14	necon3bii 3007	. . 3 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
16	13, 15	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
17		fvco3 6974	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
18	5, 17	sylan 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
19	1	adantr 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
20	2	adantr 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
21		simpr 490	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀)
22	10	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 0 ∈ ℕ₀)
23	19, 20, 3, 4, 21, 22	ruclem10 16360	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)))
24	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem4 16355	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘0) = ⟨0, 1⟩)
25	24	fveq2d 6878	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩))
26		c0ex 11257	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
27		1ex 11260	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 1 ∈ V
28	26, 27	op2nd 7994	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩) = 1
29	25, 28	eqtrdi 2811	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
30	29	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
31	23, 30	breqtrd 5131	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1)
32	5	ffvelcdmda 7073	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ))
33		xp1st 8017	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
34	32, 33	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
35		1re 11265	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
36		ltle 11355	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
37	34, 35, 36	sylancl 598	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
38	31, 37	mpd 16	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1)
39	18, 38	eqbrtrd 5127	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
40	39	ralrimiva 3154	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
41	7	ffnd 6699	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀)
42		breq1 5106	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) → (𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
43	42	ralrn 7077	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀ → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
44	41, 43	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
45	40, 44	mpbird 260	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1)
46	8, 16, 45	3jca 1146	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 ≠ wne 2955 ∀wral 3076 ⦋csb 3847 ∪ cun 3897 ⊆ wss 3899 ∅c0 4279 ifcif 4482 {csn 4584 ⟨cop 4590 class class class wbr 5103 × cxp 5646 dom cdm 5648 ran crn 5649 ∘ ccom 5652 Fn wfn 6523 ⟶wf 6524 ‘cfv 6528 (class class class)co 7409 ∈ cmpo 7411 1^st c1st 7983 2^nd c2nd 7984 ℝcr 11156 0cc0 11157 1c1 11158 + caddc 11160 < clt 11300 ≤ cle 11301 / cdiv 11928 ℕcn 12290 2c2 12352 ℕ₀cn0 12561 seqcseq 14098

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2732 ax-sep 5249 ax-nul 5260 ax-pow 5327 ax-pr 5391 ax-un 7735 ax-cnex 11213 ax-resscn 11214 ax-1cn 11215 ax-icn 11216 ax-addcl 11217 ax-addrcl 11218 ax-mulcl 11219 ax-mulrcl 11220 ax-mulcom 11221 ax-addass 11222 ax-mulass 11223 ax-distr 11224 ax-i2m1 11225 ax-1ne0 11226 ax-1rid 11227 ax-rnegex 11228 ax-rrecex 11229 ax-cnre 11230 ax-pre-lttri 11231 ax-pre-lttrn 11232 ax-pre-ltadd 11233 ax-pre-mulgt0 11234

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2564 df-eu 2594 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-nel 3062 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rmo 3365 df-reu 3366 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3740 df-csb 3848 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-in 3906 df-ss 3916 df-pss 3919 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-iun 4953 df-br 5104 df-opab 5168 df-mpt 5187 df-tr 5213 df-id 5543 df-eprel 5548 df-po 5556 df-so 5557 df-fr 5601 df-we 5603 df-xp 5654 df-rel 5655 df-cnv 5656 df-co 5657 df-dm 5658 df-rn 5659 df-res 5660 df-ima 5661 df-pred 6294 df-ord 6355 df-on 6356 df-lim 6357 df-suc 6358 df-iota 6484 df-fun 6530 df-fn 6531 df-f 6532 df-f1 6533 df-fo 6534 df-f1o 6535 df-fv 6536 df-riota 7366 df-ov 7412 df-oprab 7413 df-mpo 7414 df-om 7862 df-1st 7985 df-2nd 7986 df-frecs 8278 df-wrecs 8309 df-recs 8358 df-rdg 8397 df-er 8696 df-en 8953 df-dom 8954 df-sdom 8955 df-pnf 11302 df-mnf 11303 df-xr 11304 df-ltxr 11305 df-le 11306 df-sub 11500 df-neg 11501 df-div 11929 df-nn 12291 df-2 12360 df-n0 12562 df-z 12649 df-uz 12921 df-fz 13595 df-seq 14099

This theorem is used by: ruclem12 16362

W3C validator