ruclem11 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ruclem11		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ruclem11 16332

Description: Lemma for ruc 16335. Closure lemmas for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
ruc.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
ruc.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
ruc.4	⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
ruc.5	⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ruclem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑚,𝑦 𝑧,𝐶 𝑧,𝑚,𝐹,𝑥,𝑦 𝑚,𝐺,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝜑,𝑧 𝑧,𝐷 Allowed substitution hints: 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐷(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚)

Proof of Theorem ruclem11 Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ruc.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
2		ruc.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
3		ruc.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
4		ruc.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)
5	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem6 16327	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ))
6		1stcof 8019	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
8	7	frnd 6715	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ)
9	7	fdmd 6717	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ℕ₀)
10		0nn0 12546	. . . . 5 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℕ₀
11		ne0i 4290	. . . . 5 ⊢ (0 ∈ ℕ₀ → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
12	10, 11	mp1i 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
13	9, 12	eqnetrd 3024	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
14		dm0rn0 5912	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅)
15	14	necon3bii 3009	. . 3 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
16	13, 15	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
17		fvco3 6982	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
18	5, 17	sylan 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
19	1	adantr 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
20	2	adantr 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
21		simpr 490	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀)
22	10	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 0 ∈ ℕ₀)
23	19, 20, 3, 4, 21, 22	ruclem10 16331	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)))
24	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem4 16326	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘0) = ⟨0, 1⟩)
25	24	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩))
26		c0ex 11227	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
27		1ex 11230	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 1 ∈ V
28	26, 27	op2nd 7998	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩) = 1
29	25, 28	eqtrdi 2813	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
30	29	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
31	23, 30	breqtrd 5135	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1)
32	5	ffvelcdmda 7080	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ))
33		xp1st 8021	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
34	32, 33	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
35		1re 11235	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
36		ltle 11325	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
37	34, 35, 36	sylancl 598	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
38	31, 37	mpd 16	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1)
39	18, 38	eqbrtrd 5131	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
40	39	ralrimiva 3156	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
41	7	ffnd 6707	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀)
42		breq1 5110	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) → (𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
43	42	ralrn 7084	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀ → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
44	41, 43	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
45	40, 44	mpbird 260	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1)
46	8, 16, 45	3jca 1146	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 ≠ wne 2957 ∀wral 3078 ⦋csb 3850 ∪ cun 3900 ⊆ wss 3902 ∅c0 4282 ifcif 4485 {csn 4587 ⟨cop 4593 class class class wbr 5107 × cxp 5657 dom cdm 5659 ran crn 5660 ∘ ccom 5663 Fn wfn 6532 ⟶wf 6533 ‘cfv 6537 (class class class)co 7416 ∈ cmpo 7418 1^st c1st 7987 2^nd c2nd 7988 ℝcr 11126 0cc0 11127 1c1 11128 + caddc 11130 < clt 11270 ≤ cle 11271 / cdiv 11898 ℕcn 12260 2c2 12322 ℕ₀cn0 12531 seqcseq 14067

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2215 ax-ext 2734 ax-sep 5255 ax-nul 5267 ax-pow 5334 ax-pr 5402 ax-un 7739 ax-cnex 11183 ax-resscn 11184 ax-1cn 11185 ax-icn 11186 ax-addcl 11187 ax-addrcl 11188 ax-mulcl 11189 ax-mulrcl 11190 ax-mulcom 11191 ax-addass 11192 ax-mulass 11193 ax-distr 11194 ax-i2m1 11195 ax-1ne0 11196 ax-1rid 11197 ax-rnegex 11198 ax-rrecex 11199 ax-cnre 11200 ax-pre-lttri 11201 ax-pre-lttrn 11202 ax-pre-ltadd 11203 ax-pre-mulgt0 11204

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2566 df-eu 2596 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-nfc 2911 df-ne 2958 df-nel 3064 df-ral 3079 df-rex 3089 df-rmo 3367 df-reu 3368 df-rab 3415 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3851 df-dif 3905 df-un 3907 df-in 3909 df-ss 3919 df-pss 3922 df-nul 4283 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4588 df-pr 4590 df-op 4594 df-uni 4871 df-iun 4956 df-br 5108 df-opab 5172 df-mpt 5191 df-tr 5217 df-id 5554 df-eprel 5559 df-po 5567 df-so 5568 df-fr 5612 df-we 5614 df-xp 5665 df-rel 5666 df-cnv 5667 df-co 5668 df-dm 5669 df-rn 5670 df-res 5671 df-ima 5672 df-pred 6303 df-ord 6364 df-on 6365 df-lim 6366 df-suc 6367 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fn 6540 df-f 6541 df-f1 6542 df-fo 6543 df-f1o 6544 df-fv 6545 df-riota 7373 df-ov 7419 df-oprab 7420 df-mpo 7421 df-om 7866 df-1st 7989 df-2nd 7990 df-frecs 8283 df-wrecs 8314 df-recs 8363 df-rdg 8402 df-er 8699 df-en 8956 df-dom 8957 df-sdom 8958 df-pnf 11272 df-mnf 11273 df-xr 11274 df-ltxr 11275 df-le 11276 df-sub 11470 df-neg 11471 df-div 11899 df-nn 12261 df-2 12330 df-n0 12532 df-z 12619 df-uz 12891 df-fz 13564 df-seq 14068

This theorem is used by: ruclem12 16333

W3C validator