ruclem11 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ruclem11		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ruclem11 16408

Description: Lemma for ruc 16411. Closure lemmas for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
ruc.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
ruc.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
ruc.4	⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
ruc.5	⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ruclem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑚,𝑦 𝑧,𝐶 𝑧,𝑚,𝐹,𝑥,𝑦 𝑚,𝐺,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝜑,𝑧 𝑧,𝐷 Allowed substitution hints: 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐷(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚)

Proof of Theorem ruclem11 Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ruc.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
2		ruc.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
3		ruc.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
4		ruc.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)
5	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem6 16403	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ))
6		1stcof 8031	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
8	7	frnd 6718	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ)
9	7	fdmd 6720	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ℕ₀)
10		0nn0 12621	. . . . 5 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℕ₀
11		ne0i 4286	. . . . 5 ⊢ (0 ∈ ℕ₀ → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
12	10, 11	mp1i 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
13	9, 12	eqnetrd 3022	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
14		dm0rn0 5905	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅)
15	14	necon3bii 3007	. . 3 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
16	13, 15	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
17		fvco3 6985	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
18	5, 17	sylan 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
19	1	adantr 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
20	2	adantr 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
21		simpr 490	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀)
22	10	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 0 ∈ ℕ₀)
23	19, 20, 3, 4, 21, 22	ruclem10 16407	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)))
24	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem4 16402	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘0) = ⟨0, 1⟩)
25	24	fveq2d 6889	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩))
26		c0ex 11300	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
27		1ex 11303	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 1 ∈ V
28	26, 27	op2nd 8010	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩) = 1
29	25, 28	eqtrdi 2811	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
30	29	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
31	23, 30	breqtrd 5130	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1)
32	5	ffvelcdmda 7084	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ))
33		xp1st 8033	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
34	32, 33	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
35		1re 11308	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
36		ltle 11398	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
37	34, 35, 36	sylancl 598	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
38	31, 37	mpd 16	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1)
39	18, 38	eqbrtrd 5126	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
40	39	ralrimiva 3154	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
41	7	ffnd 6710	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀)
42		breq1 5105	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) → (𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
43	42	ralrn 7088	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀ → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
44	41, 43	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
45	40, 44	mpbird 260	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1)
46	8, 16, 45	3jca 1146	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1569 ∈ wcel 2144 ≠ wne 2955 ∀wral 3076 ⦋csb 3846 ⊆ wss 3895 ∪ cun 4149 ∅c0 4278 ifcif 4481 {csn 4583 ⟨cop 4589 class class class wbr 5102 × cxp 5648 dom cdm 5650 ran crn 5651 ∘ ccom 5654 Fn wfn 6533 ⟶wf 6534 ‘cfv 6538 (class class class)co 7420 ∈ cmpo 7422 1^st c1st 7999 2^nd c2nd 8000 ℝcr 11199 0cc0 11200 1c1 11201 + caddc 11203 < clt 11343 ≤ cle 11344 / cdiv 11973 ℕcn 12335 2c2 12397 ℕ₀cn0 12606 seqcseq 14144

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1827 ax-4 1841 ax-5 1942 ax-6 1999 ax-7 2040 ax-8 2146 ax-9 2154 ax-10 2177 ax-11 2193 ax-12 2212 ax-ext 2732 ax-sep 5248 ax-nul 5259 ax-pow 5326 ax-pr 5390 ax-un 7751 ax-cnex 11256 ax-resscn 11257 ax-1cn 11258 ax-icn 11259 ax-addcl 11260 ax-addrcl 11261 ax-mulcl 11262 ax-mulrcl 11263 ax-mulcom 11264 ax-addass 11265 ax-mulass 11266 ax-distr 11267 ax-i2m1 11268 ax-1ne0 11269 ax-1rid 11270 ax-rnegex 11271 ax-rrecex 11272 ax-cnre 11273 ax-pre-lttri 11274 ax-pre-lttrn 11275 ax-pre-ltadd 11276 ax-pre-mulgt0 11277

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1572 df-fal 1582 df-ex 1812 df-nf 1816 df-sb 2099 df-mo 2564 df-eu 2594 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-nel 3062 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rmo 3365 df-reu 3366 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3739 df-csb 3847 df-ss 3896 df-pss 4014 df-dif 4047 df-in 4091 df-un 4151 df-nul 4279 df-if 4482 df-pw 4558 df-sn 4584 df-pr 4586 df-op 4590 df-uni 4867 df-iun 4952 df-br 5103 df-opab 5167 df-mpt 5186 df-tr 5212 df-id 5545 df-eprel 5550 df-po 5558 df-so 5559 df-fr 5603 df-we 5605 df-xp 5656 df-rel 5657 df-cnv 5658 df-co 5659 df-dm 5660 df-rn 5661 df-res 5662 df-ima 5663 df-pred 6304 df-ord 6365 df-on 6366 df-lim 6367 df-suc 6368 df-iota 6494 df-fun 6540 df-fn 6541 df-f 6542 df-f1 6543 df-fo 6544 df-f1o 6545 df-fv 6546 df-riota 7377 df-ov 7423 df-oprab 7424 df-mpo 7425 df-om 7878 df-1st 8001 df-2nd 8002 df-frecs 8299 df-wrecs 8330 df-recs 8379 df-rdg 8418 df-er 8717 df-en 8974 df-dom 8975 df-sdom 8976 df-pnf 11345 df-mnf 11346 df-xr 11347 df-ltxr 11348 df-le 11349 df-sub 11543 df-neg 11544 df-div 11974 df-nn 12336 df-2 12405 df-n0 12607 df-z 12694 df-uz 12966 df-fz 13640 df-seq 14145

This theorem is used by: ruclem12 16409

W3C validator