ruclem11 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ruclem11		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ruclem11 16434

Description: Lemma for ruc 16437. Closure lemmas for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
ruc.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
ruc.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
ruc.4	⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
ruc.5	⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ruclem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑚,𝑦 𝑧,𝐶 𝑧,𝑚,𝐹,𝑥,𝑦 𝑚,𝐺,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝜑,𝑧 𝑧,𝐷 Allowed substitution hints: 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚) 𝐷(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑚)

Proof of Theorem ruclem11 Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ruc.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
2		ruc.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
3		ruc.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)
4		ruc.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)
5	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem6 16429	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ))
6		1stcof 8052	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺):ℕ₀⟶ℝ)
8	7	frnd 6737	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ)
9	7	fdmd 6739	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ℕ₀)
10		0nn0 12645	. . . . 5 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℕ₀
11		ne0i 4290	. . . . 5 ⊢ (0 ∈ ℕ₀ → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
12	10, 11	mp1i 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ℕ₀ ≠ ∅)
13	9, 12	eqnetrd 3026	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
14		dm0rn0 5912	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) = ∅)
15	14	necon3bii 3011	. . 3 ⊢ (dom (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ↔ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
16	13, 15	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅)
17		fvco3 7005	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺:ℕ₀⟶(ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
18	5, 17	sylan 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) = (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)))
19	1	adantr 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)
20	2	adantr 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1^st ‘𝑥) + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2^nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))
21		simpr 490	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀)
22	10	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → 0 ∈ ℕ₀)
23	19, 20, 3, 4, 21, 22	ruclem10 16433	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)))
24	1, 2, 3, 4	ruclem4 16428	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘0) = ⟨0, 1⟩)
25	24	fveq2d 6909	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩))
26		c0ex 11324	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
27		1ex 11327	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 1 ∈ V
28	26, 27	op2nd 8031	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (2^nd ‘⟨0, 1⟩) = 1
29	25, 28	eqtrdi 2814	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
30	29	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (2^nd ‘(𝐺‘0)) = 1)
31	23, 30	breqtrd 5134	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1)
32	5	ffvelcdmda 7105	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ))
33		xp1st 8054	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑛) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
34	32, 33	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ)
35		1re 11332	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
36		ltle 11422	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
37	34, 35, 36	sylancl 598	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) < 1 → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1))
38	31, 37	mpd 16	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → (1^st ‘(𝐺‘𝑛)) ≤ 1)
39	18, 38	eqbrtrd 5130	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀) → ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
40	39	ralrimiva 3158	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1)
41	7	ffnd 6729	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀)
42		breq1 5109	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) → (𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
43	42	ralrn 7109	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺) Fn ℕ₀ → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
44	41, 43	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀ ((1^st ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑛) ≤ 1))
45	40, 44	mpbird 260	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1)
46	8, 16, 45	3jca 1146	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1^st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2147 ≠ wne 2959 ∀wral 3080 ⦋csb 3851 ⊆ wss 3900 ∪ cun 4152 ∅c0 4281 ifcif 4485 {csn 4588 ⟨cop 4838 class class class wbr 5106 × cxp 5653 dom cdm 5655 ran crn 5656 ∘ ccom 5659 Fn wfn 6550 ⟶wf 6551 ‘cfv 6555 (class class class)co 7440 ∈ cmpo 7442 1^st c1st 8020 2^nd c2nd 8021 ℝcr 11223 0cc0 11224 1c1 11225 + caddc 11227 < clt 11367 ≤ cle 11368 / cdiv 11997 ℕcn 12359 2c2 12421 ℕ₀cn0 12630 seqcseq 14168

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 ax-8 2149 ax-9 2157 ax-10 2180 ax-11 2197 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5252 ax-nul 5263 ax-pow 5331 ax-pr 5395 ax-un 7772 ax-cnex 11280 ax-resscn 11281 ax-1cn 11282 ax-icn 11283 ax-addcl 11284 ax-addrcl 11285 ax-mulcl 11286 ax-mulrcl 11287 ax-mulcom 11288 ax-addass 11289 ax-mulass 11290 ax-distr 11291 ax-i2m1 11292 ax-1ne0 11293 ax-1rid 11294 ax-rnegex 11295 ax-rrecex 11296 ax-cnre 11297 ax-pre-lttri 11298 ax-pre-lttrn 11299 ax-pre-ltadd 11300 ax-pre-mulgt0 11301

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2102 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-nel 3066 df-ral 3081 df-rex 3091 df-rmo 3369 df-reu 3370 df-rab 3417 df-v 3456 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3852 df-ss 3901 df-pss 4017 df-dif 4050 df-in 4094 df-un 4154 df-nul 4282 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4839 df-uni 4871 df-iun 4956 df-br 5107 df-opab 5171 df-mpt 5190 df-tr 5216 df-id 5550 df-eprel 5555 df-po 5563 df-so 5564 df-fr 5608 df-we 5610 df-xp 5661 df-rel 5662 df-cnv 5663 df-co 5664 df-dm 5665 df-rn 5666 df-res 5667 df-ima 5668 df-pred 6319 df-ord 6380 df-on 6381 df-lim 6382 df-suc 6383 df-iota 6509 df-fun 6557 df-fn 6558 df-f 6559 df-f1 6560 df-fo 6561 df-f1o 6562 df-fv 6563 df-riota 7397 df-ov 7443 df-oprab 7444 df-mpo 7445 df-om 7899 df-1st 8022 df-2nd 8023 df-frecs 8324 df-wrecs 8355 df-recs 8404 df-rdg 8443 df-er 8742 df-en 8999 df-dom 9000 df-sdom 9001 df-pnf 11369 df-mnf 11370 df-xr 11371 df-ltxr 11372 df-le 11373 df-sub 11567 df-neg 11568 df-div 11998 df-nn 12360 df-2 12429 df-n0 12631 df-z 12718 df-uz 12990 df-fz 13664 df-seq 14169

This theorem is used by: ruclem12 16435

W3C validator