Theorem vtxdg0e 29942

Description: The degree of a vertex in an empty graph is zero, because there are no edges. This is the base case for the induction for calculating the degree of a vertex, for example in a Königsberg graph (see also the induction steps vdegp1ai 30004, vdegp1bi 30005 and vdegp1ci 30006). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 11-Dec-2020.) (Revised by AV, 22-Mar-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
vtxdgf.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
vtxdg0e.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
vtxdg0e	⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑈) = 0)

Proof of Theorem vtxdg0e

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vtxdg0e.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
2	1	eqeq1i 2767	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 = ∅ ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅)
3		dmeq 5891	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = dom ∅)
4		dm0 5908	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2813	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅)
6		0fi 9053	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ Fin
7	5, 6	eqeltrdi 2870	. . . 4 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ Fin)
8	2, 7	sylbi 220	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ Fin)
9		simpl 488	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)
10		vtxdgf.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
11		eqid 2762	. . . 4 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
12		eqid 2762	. . . 4 ⊢ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = dom (iEdg‘𝐺)
13	10, 11, 12	vtxdgfival 29937	. . 3 ⊢ ((dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑈) = ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})))
14	8, 9, 13	syl2an2 699	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑈) = ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})))
15	2, 5	sylbi 220	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐼 = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅)
16	15	adantl 487	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅)
17		rabeq 3428	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)} = {𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)})
18		rab0 4338	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)} = ∅
19	17, 18	eqtrdi 2813	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)} = ∅)
20	19	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) = (♯‘∅))
21		hash0 14435	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (♯‘∅) = 0
22	20, 21	eqtrdi 2813	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) = 0)
23		rabeq 3428	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}} = {𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})
24	23	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}) = (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}))
25		rab0 4338	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}} = ∅
26	25	fveq2i 6885	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}) = (♯‘∅)
27	26, 21	eqtri 2785	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}) = 0
28	24, 27	eqtrdi 2813	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}) = 0)
29	22, 28	oveq12d 7435	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})) = (0 + 0))
30	16, 29	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})) = (0 + 0))
31		00id 11413	. . 3 ⊢ (0 + 0) = 0
32	30, 31	eqtrdi 2813	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})) = 0)
33	14, 32	eqtrd 2797	1 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑈) = 0)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {crab 3414  ∅c0 4282  {csn 4587  dom cdm 5659  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7417  Fincfn 8956  0cc0 11128   + caddc 11131  ♯chash 14398  Vtxcvtx 29461  iEdgciedg 29462  VtxDegcvtxdg 29933

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740  ax-cnex 11184  ax-resscn 11185  ax-1cn 11186  ax-icn 11187  ax-addcl 11188  ax-addrcl 11189  ax-mulcl 11190  ax-mulrcl 11191  ax-mulcom 11192  ax-addass 11193  ax-mulass 11194  ax-distr 11195  ax-i2m1 11196  ax-1ne0 11197  ax-1rid 11198  ax-rnegex 11199  ax-rrecex 11200  ax-cnre 11201  ax-pre-lttri 11202  ax-pre-lttrn 11203  ax-pre-ltadd 11204  ax-pre-mulgt0 11205

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-nel 3064  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7374  df-ov 7420  df-oprab 7421  df-mpo 7422  df-om 7867  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-frecs 8284  df-wrecs 8315  df-recs 8364  df-rdg 8403  df-1o 8459  df-er 8700  df-en 8957  df-dom 8958  df-sdom 8959  df-fin 8960  df-card 9948  df-pnf 11273  df-mnf 11274  df-xr 11275  df-ltxr 11276  df-le 11277  df-sub 11471  df-neg 11472  df-nn 12262  df-n0 12533  df-z 12620  df-uz 12892  df-xadd 13168  df-fz 13566  df-hash 14399  df-vtxdg 29934

This theorem is used by:  vtxduhgr0e  29946  0edg0rgr  30040  eupth2lemb  30725  konigsberglem1  30740  konigsberglem2  30741  konigsberglem3  30742