Theorem vtxdg0e 30085

Description: The degree of a vertex in an empty graph is zero, because there are no edges. This is the base case for the induction for calculating the degree of a vertex, for example in a Königsberg graph (see also the induction steps vdegp1ai 30147, vdegp1bi 30148 and vdegp1ci 30149). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 11-Dec-2020.) (Revised by AV, 22-Mar-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
vtxdgf.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
vtxdg0e.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
vtxdg0e	⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑈) = 0)

Proof of Theorem vtxdg0e

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vtxdg0e.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
2	1	eqeq1i 2768	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 = ∅ ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅)
3		dmeq 5892	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = dom ∅)
4		dm0 5909	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2814	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅)
6		0fi 9098	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ Fin
7	5, 6	eqeltrdi 2872	. . . 4 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ Fin)
8	2, 7	sylbi 220	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐼 = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ Fin)
9		simpl 488	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)
10		vtxdgf.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
11		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
12		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = dom (iEdg‘𝐺)
13	10, 11, 12	vtxdgfival 30080	. . 3 ⊢ ((dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑈) = ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})))
14	8, 9, 13	syl2an2 699	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑈) = ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})))
15	2, 5	sylbi 220	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐼 = ∅ → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅)
16	15	adantl 487	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅)
17		rabeq 3430	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)} = {𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)})
18		rab0 4338	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)} = ∅
19	17, 18	eqtrdi 2814	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)} = ∅)
20	19	fveq2d 6912	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) = (♯‘∅))
21		hash0 14538	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (♯‘∅) = 0
22	20, 21	eqtrdi 2814	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) = 0)
23		rabeq 3430	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}} = {𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})
24	23	fveq2d 6912	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}) = (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}))
25		rab0 4338	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}} = ∅
26	25	fveq2i 6911	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}) = (♯‘∅)
27	26, 21	eqtri 2786	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}) = 0
28	24, 27	eqtrdi 2814	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}}) = 0)
29	22, 28	oveq12d 7461	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = ∅ → ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})) = (0 + 0))
30	16, 29	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})) = (0 + 0))
31		00id 11512	. . 3 ⊢ (0 + 0) = 0
32	30, 31	eqtrdi 2814	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ 𝑈 ∈ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})) = 0)
33	14, 32	eqtrd 2798	1 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 = ∅) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑈) = 0)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  {crab 3416  ∅c0 4281  {csn 4588  dom cdm 5655  ‘cfv 6558  (class class class)co 7443  Fincfn 9001  0cc0 11227   + caddc 11230  ♯chash 14501  Vtxcvtx 29604  iEdgciedg 29605  VtxDegcvtxdg 30076

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775  ax-cnex 11283  ax-resscn 11284  ax-1cn 11285  ax-icn 11286  ax-addcl 11287  ax-addrcl 11288  ax-mulcl 11289  ax-mulrcl 11290  ax-mulcom 11291  ax-addass 11292  ax-mulass 11293  ax-distr 11294  ax-i2m1 11295  ax-1ne0 11296  ax-1rid 11297  ax-rnegex 11298  ax-rrecex 11299  ax-cnre 11300  ax-pre-lttri 11301  ax-pre-lttrn 11302  ax-pre-ltadd 11303  ax-pre-mulgt0 11304

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-nel 3066  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6322  df-ord 6383  df-on 6384  df-lim 6385  df-suc 6386  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-riota 7400  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-om 7902  df-1st 8025  df-2nd 8026  df-frecs 8327  df-wrecs 8358  df-recs 8407  df-rdg 8446  df-1o 8504  df-er 8745  df-en 9002  df-dom 9003  df-sdom 9004  df-fin 9005  df-card 10047  df-pnf 11372  df-mnf 11373  df-xr 11374  df-ltxr 11375  df-le 11376  df-sub 11570  df-neg 11571  df-nn 12363  df-n0 12634  df-z 12721  df-uz 12993  df-xadd 13269  df-fz 13667  df-hash 14502  df-vtxdg 30077

This theorem is used by:  vtxduhgr0e  30089  0edg0rgr  30183  eupth2lemb  30868  konigsberglem1  30883  konigsberglem2  30884  konigsberglem3  30885