Theorem redcwlpo 17117

Description: Decidability of real number equality implies the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). We expect that we'd need some form of countable choice to prove the converse.

Here's the outline of the proof. Given an infinite sequence F of zeroes and ones, we need to show the sequence is all ones or it is not. Construct a real number A whose representation in base two consists of a zero, a decimal point, and then the numbers of the sequence. This real number will equal one if and only if the sequence is all ones (redcwlpolemeq1 17116). Therefore decidability of real number equality would imply decidability of whether the sequence is all ones.

Because of this theorem, decidability of real number equality is sometimes called "analytic WLPO".

WLPO is known to not be provable in IZF (and most constructive foundations), so this theorem establishes that we will be unable to prove an analogue to qdceq 10681 for real numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
redcwlpo	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem redcwlpo

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑗 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)
2		elmapi 6944	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ) → 𝑓:ℕ⟶{0, 1})
3	2	adantl 277	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)) → 𝑓:ℕ⟶{0, 1})
4		oveq2 6093	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (2↑𝑖) = (2↑𝑗))
5	4	oveq2d 6101	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (1 / (2↑𝑖)) = (1 / (2↑𝑗)))
6		fveq2 5695	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (𝑓‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑗))
7	5, 6	oveq12d 6103	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = ((1 / (2↑𝑗)) · (𝑓‘𝑗)))
8	7	cbvsumv 12129	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑗)) · (𝑓‘𝑗))
9	3, 8	trilpolemcl 17098	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)) → Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) ∈ ℝ)
10		1red 8341	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)) → 1 ∈ ℝ)
11		eqeq1 2245	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 𝑦))
12	11	dcbid 850	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) → (DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ DECID Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 𝑦))
13		eqeq2 2248	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 1 → (Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 𝑦 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 1))
14	13	dcbid 850	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 1 → (DECID Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 𝑦 ↔ DECID Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 1))
15	12, 14	rspc2v 2943	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → DECID Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 1))
16	9, 10, 15	syl2anc 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → DECID Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 1))
17	1, 16	mpd 13	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)) → DECID Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 1)
18	3, 8	redcwlpolemeq1 17116	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)) → (Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 1 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ (𝑓‘𝑧) = 1))
19	18	dcbid 850	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)) → (DECID Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝑓‘𝑖)) = 1 ↔ DECID ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ (𝑓‘𝑧) = 1))
20	17, 19	mpbid 147	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)) → DECID ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ (𝑓‘𝑧) = 1)
21	20	ralrimiva 2623	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)DECID ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ (𝑓‘𝑧) = 1)
22		nnex 9311	. . . 4 ⊢ ℕ ∈ V
23		iswomninn 17112	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℕ ∈ V → (ℕ ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)DECID ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ (𝑓‘𝑧) = 1))
24	22, 23	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (ℕ ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 ℕ)DECID ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ (𝑓‘𝑧) = 1)
25	21, 24	sylibr 134	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ℕ ∈ WOmni)
26		nnenom 10873	. . 3 ⊢ ℕ ≈ ω
27		enwomni 7510	. . 3 ⊢ (ℕ ≈ ω → (ℕ ∈ WOmni ↔ ω ∈ WOmni))
28	26, 27	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (ℕ ∈ WOmni ↔ ω ∈ WOmni)
29	25, 28	sylib 122	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  DECID wdc 846   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  ∀wral 2528  Vcvv 2821  {cpr 3710   class class class wbr 4130  ωcom 4737  ⟶wf 5373  ‘cfv 5377  (class class class)co 6085   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6922   ≈ cen 7020  WOmnicwomni 7503  ℝcr 8178  0cc0 8179  1c1 8180   · cmul 8184   / cdiv 9003  ℕcn 9305  2c2 9356  ↑cexp 10977  Σcsu 12121

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-coll 4246  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-iinf 4735  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-mulrcl 8278  ax-addcom 8279  ax-mulcom 8280  ax-addass 8281  ax-mulass 8282  ax-distr 8283  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-0lt1 8285  ax-1rid 8286  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-precex 8289  ax-cnre 8290  ax-pre-ltirr 8291  ax-pre-ltwlin 8292  ax-pre-lttrn 8293  ax-pre-apti 8294  ax-pre-ltadd 8295  ax-pre-mulgt0 8296  ax-pre-mulext 8297  ax-arch 8298  ax-caucvg 8299

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rmo 2536  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-if 3639  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-iun 4014  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-tr 4230  df-id 4438  df-po 4441  df-iso 4442  df-iord 4511  df-on 4513  df-ilim 4514  df-suc 4516  df-iom 4738  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-fv 5385  df-isom 5386  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-recs 6576  df-irdg 6641  df-frec 6662  df-1o 6687  df-2o 6688  df-oadd 6691  df-er 6807  df-map 6924  df-en 7023  df-dom 7024  df-fin 7025  df-womni 7504  df-pnf 8362  df-mnf 8363  df-xr 8364  df-ltxr 8365  df-le 8366  df-sub 8499  df-neg 8500  df-reap 8904  df-ap 8911  df-div 9004  df-inn 9306  df-2 9364  df-3 9365  df-4 9366  df-n0 9566  df-z 9647  df-uz 9924  df-q 10022  df-rp 10057  df-ico 10298  df-fz 10414  df-fzo 10552  df-seqfrec 10887  df-exp 10978  df-ihash 11217  df-cj 11609  df-re 11610  df-im 11611  df-rsqrt 11766  df-abs 11767  df-clim 12047  df-sumdc 12122

This theorem is used by: (None)