Theorem cayleyth 19542

Description: Cayley's Theorem (existence version): every group 𝐺 is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group on the underlying set of 𝐺. (For any group 𝐺 there exists an isomorphism 𝑓 between 𝐺 and a subgroup ℎ of the symmetric group on the underlying set of 𝐺.) See also Theorem 3.15 in [Rotman] p. 42. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 3-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cayley.x	⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺)
cayley.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (SymGrp‘𝑋)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cayleyth	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝑠,𝐺   𝑓,𝐻,𝑠   𝑓,𝑋,𝑠

Proof of Theorem cayleyth

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cayley.x	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		cayley.h	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐻 = (SymGrp‘𝑋)
3		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
4		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) = (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
5		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	cayley 19541	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
7	6	simp1d 1160	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻))
8	6	simp2d 1161	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))))
9	6	simp3d 1162	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))
10		f1oeq1 6805	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ↔ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
11	10	rspcev 3576	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))
12	8, 9, 11	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))
13		oveq2 7421	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
14	13	oveq2d 7429	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠)) = (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))))
15		f1oeq3 6807	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠 ↔ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
16	14, 15	rexeqbidv 3335	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠 ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
17	16	rspcev 3576	. 2 ⊢ ((ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻) ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠)
18	7, 12, 17	syl2anc 596	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3086   ↦ cmpt 5186  ran crn 5656  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6532  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7413  Basecbs 17301   ↾_s cress 17322  +_gcplusg 17342  Grpcgrp 19057  SubGrpcsubg 19243   GrpHom cghm 19340  SymGrpcsymg 19496

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7736  ax-cnex 11180  ax-resscn 11181  ax-1cn 11182  ax-icn 11183  ax-addcl 11184  ax-addrcl 11185  ax-mulcl 11186  ax-mulrcl 11187  ax-mulcom 11188  ax-addass 11189  ax-mulass 11190  ax-distr 11191  ax-i2m1 11192  ax-1ne0 11193  ax-1rid 11194  ax-rnegex 11195  ax-rrecex 11196  ax-cnre 11197  ax-pre-lttri 11198  ax-pre-lttrn 11199  ax-pre-ltadd 11200  ax-pre-mulgt0 11201

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-nel 3062  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-tp 4589  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6299  df-ord 6360  df-on 6361  df-lim 6362  df-suc 6363  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7370  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-mpo 7418  df-om 7863  df-1st 7986  df-2nd 7987  df-frecs 8280  df-wrecs 8311  df-recs 8360  df-rdg 8399  df-1o 8455  df-er 8696  df-map 8828  df-en 8953  df-dom 8954  df-sdom 8955  df-fin 8956  df-pnf 11269  df-mnf 11270  df-xr 11271  df-ltxr 11272  df-le 11273  df-sub 11467  df-neg 11468  df-nn 12258  df-2 12327  df-3 12328  df-4 12329  df-5 12330  df-6 12331  df-7 12332  df-8 12333  df-9 12334  df-n0 12529  df-z 12616  df-uz 12888  df-fz 13562  df-struct 17239  df-sets 17256  df-slot 17274  df-ndx 17286  df-base 17302  df-ress 17323  df-plusg 17355  df-tset 17361  df-0g 17526  df-mgm 18730  df-sgrp 18821  df-mnd 18837  df-mhm 18891  df-submnd 18892  df-efmnd 18978  df-grp 19060  df-minusg 19061  df-sbg 19062  df-subg 19246  df-ghm 19341  df-ga 19417  df-symg 19497

This theorem is used by: (None)