Theorem cayleyth 19529

Description: Cayley's Theorem (existence version): every group 𝐺 is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group on the underlying set of 𝐺. (For any group 𝐺 there exists an isomorphism 𝑓 between 𝐺 and a subgroup ℎ of the symmetric group on the underlying set of 𝐺.) See also Theorem 3.15 in [Rotman] p. 42. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 3-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cayley.x	⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺)
cayley.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (SymGrp‘𝑋)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cayleyth	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝑠,𝐺   𝑓,𝐻,𝑠   𝑓,𝑋,𝑠

Proof of Theorem cayleyth

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cayley.x	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		cayley.h	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐻 = (SymGrp‘𝑋)
3		eqid 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
4		eqid 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) = (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
5		eqid 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	cayley 19528	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
7	6	simp1d 1160	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻))
8	6	simp2d 1161	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))))
9	6	simp3d 1162	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))
10		f1oeq1 6812	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ↔ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
11	10	rspcev 3583	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))
12	8, 9, 11	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))
13		oveq2 7427	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
14	13	oveq2d 7435	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠)) = (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))))
15		f1oeq3 6814	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠 ↔ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
16	14, 15	rexeqbidv 3341	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠 ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
17	16	rspcev 3583	. 2 ⊢ ((ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻) ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠)
18	7, 12, 17	syl2anc 596	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∃wrex 3091   ↦ cmpt 5194  ran crn 5664  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6539  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7419  Basecbs 17291   ↾_s cress 17312  +_gcplusg 17332  Grpcgrp 19044  SubGrpcsubg 19230   GrpHom cghm 19327  SymGrpcsymg 19483

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742  ax-cnex 11171  ax-resscn 11172  ax-1cn 11173  ax-icn 11174  ax-addcl 11175  ax-addrcl 11176  ax-mulcl 11177  ax-mulrcl 11178  ax-mulcom 11179  ax-addass 11180  ax-mulass 11181  ax-distr 11182  ax-i2m1 11183  ax-1ne0 11184  ax-1rid 11185  ax-rnegex 11186  ax-rrecex 11187  ax-cnre 11188  ax-pre-lttri 11189  ax-pre-lttrn 11190  ax-pre-ltadd 11191  ax-pre-mulgt0 11192

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-nel 3067  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rmo 3371  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-tp 4596  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-tr 5221  df-id 5558  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-pred 6306  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-riota 7376  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-mpo 7424  df-om 7869  df-1st 7992  df-2nd 7993  df-frecs 8284  df-wrecs 8315  df-recs 8364  df-rdg 8403  df-1o 8459  df-er 8700  df-map 8832  df-en 8950  df-dom 8951  df-sdom 8952  df-fin 8953  df-pnf 11260  df-mnf 11261  df-xr 11262  df-ltxr 11263  df-le 11264  df-sub 11458  df-neg 11459  df-nn 12249  df-2 12318  df-3 12319  df-4 12320  df-5 12321  df-6 12322  df-7 12323  df-8 12324  df-9 12325  df-n0 12520  df-z 12607  df-uz 12879  df-fz 13552  df-struct 17229  df-sets 17246  df-slot 17264  df-ndx 17276  df-base 17292  df-ress 17313  df-plusg 17345  df-tset 17351  df-0g 17516  df-mgm 18720  df-sgrp 18809  df-mnd 18825  df-mhm 18878  df-submnd 18879  df-efmnd 18965  df-grp 19047  df-minusg 19048  df-sbg 19049  df-subg 19233  df-ghm 19328  df-ga 19404  df-symg 19484

This theorem is used by: (None)