Theorem cayleyth 19638

Description: Cayley's Theorem (existence version): every group 𝐺 is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group on the underlying set of 𝐺. (For any group 𝐺 there exists an isomorphism 𝑓 between 𝐺 and a subgroup ℎ of the symmetric group on the underlying set of 𝐺.) See also Theorem 3.15 in [Rotman] p. 42. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 3-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cayley.x	⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺)
cayley.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (SymGrp‘𝑋)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cayleyth	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝑠,𝐺   𝑓,𝐻,𝑠   𝑓,𝑋,𝑠

Proof of Theorem cayleyth

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cayley.x	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		cayley.h	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐻 = (SymGrp‘𝑋)
3		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
4		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) = (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
5		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	cayley 19637	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
7	6	simp1d 1160	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻))
8	6	simp2d 1161	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))))
9	6	simp3d 1162	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))
10		f1oeq1 6817	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ↔ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
11	10	rspcev 3576	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))):𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))
12	8, 9, 11	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))
13		oveq2 7432	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠) = (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
14	13	oveq2d 7440	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠)) = (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))))))
15		f1oeq3 6819	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠 ↔ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
16	14, 15	rexeqbidv 3335	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑠 = ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) → (∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠 ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))
17	16	rspcev 3576	. 2 ⊢ ((ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻) ∧ ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→ran (𝑔 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑔(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠)
18	7, 12, 17	syl2anc 596	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Grp → ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐻)∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐺 GrpHom (𝐻 ↾s 𝑠))𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑠)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∃wrex 3086   ↦ cmpt 5185  ran crn 5652  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6542  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7424  Basecbs 17396   ↾_s cress 17417  +_gcplusg 17437  Grpcgrp 19153  SubGrpcsubg 19339   GrpHom cghm 19436  SymGrpcsymg 19592

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7755  ax-cnex 11263  ax-resscn 11264  ax-1cn 11265  ax-icn 11266  ax-addcl 11267  ax-addrcl 11268  ax-mulcl 11269  ax-mulrcl 11270  ax-mulcom 11271  ax-addass 11272  ax-mulass 11273  ax-distr 11274  ax-i2m1 11275  ax-1ne0 11276  ax-1rid 11277  ax-rnegex 11278  ax-rrecex 11279  ax-cnre 11280  ax-pre-lttri 11281  ax-pre-lttrn 11282  ax-pre-ltadd 11283  ax-pre-mulgt0 11284

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-nel 3062  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3848  df-ss 3897  df-pss 4013  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-tp 4589  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-tr 5212  df-id 5546  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-we 5606  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-pred 6307  df-ord 6368  df-on 6369  df-lim 6370  df-suc 6371  df-iota 6497  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-riota 7381  df-ov 7427  df-oprab 7428  df-mpo 7429  df-om 7882  df-1st 8005  df-2nd 8006  df-frecs 8306  df-wrecs 8337  df-recs 8386  df-rdg 8425  df-1o 8483  df-er 8724  df-map 8856  df-en 8981  df-dom 8982  df-sdom 8983  df-fin 8984  df-pnf 11352  df-mnf 11353  df-xr 11354  df-ltxr 11355  df-le 11356  df-sub 11550  df-neg 11551  df-nn 12343  df-2 12412  df-3 12413  df-4 12414  df-5 12415  df-6 12416  df-7 12417  df-8 12418  df-9 12419  df-n0 12614  df-z 12701  df-uz 12973  df-fz 13647  df-struct 17334  df-sets 17351  df-slot 17369  df-ndx 17381  df-base 17397  df-ress 17418  df-plusg 17450  df-tset 17456  df-0g 17621  df-mgm 18825  df-sgrp 18917  df-mnd 18933  df-mhm 18987  df-submnd 18988  df-efmnd 19074  df-grp 19156  df-minusg 19157  df-sbg 19158  df-subg 19342  df-ghm 19437  df-ga 19513  df-symg 19593

This theorem is used by: (None)