Theorem limsupvaluz 46662

Description: The superior limit, when the domain of the function is a set of upper integers (the first condition is needed, otherwise the l.h.s. would be -∞ and the r.h.s. would be +∞). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
limsupvaluz.m	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)
limsupvaluz.z	⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)
limsupvaluz.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
limsupvaluz	⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑘,𝐹   𝑘,𝑍

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑘)   𝑀(𝑘)

Proof of Theorem limsupvaluz

Dummy variables 𝑖 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
2		limsupvaluz.f	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)
3		limsupvaluz.z	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)
4	3	fvexi 6891	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V
5	4	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ V)
6	2, 5	fexd 7225	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
7	3	uzssre2 46361	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑍 ⊆ ℝ
8	7	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ ℝ)
9		limsupvaluz.m	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)
10	3	uzsup 13983	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → sup(𝑍, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)
11	9, 10	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝑍, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)
12	1, 6, 8, 11	limsupval2 15627	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(((𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) “ 𝑍), ℝ*, < ))
13	8	mptimass 6067	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) “ 𝑍) = ran (𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )))
14		oveq1 7419	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑛 → (𝑖[,)+∞) = (𝑛[,)+∞))
15	14	imaeq2d 6054	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑛 → (𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) = (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
16	15	ineq1d 4165	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑛 → ((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*))
17	16	supeq1d 9422	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑛 → sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) = sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
18	17	cbvmptv 5209	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
19	2	fimassd 6723	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ⊆ ℝ*)
20		dfss2 3917	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ⊆ ℝ* ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
21	19, 20	sylib 221	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
22	21	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
23		df-ima 5664	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞))
24	23	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
25		resindm 6021	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐹 ↾ ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹)) = (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞))
26	3	ineq1i 4162	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ (𝑍 ∩ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∩ (𝑛[,)+∞))
27	26	ineqcomi 4157	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ 𝑍) = ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∩ (𝑛[,)+∞))
28	2	fdmd 6712	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 = 𝑍)
29	28	ineq2d 4166	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹) = ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ 𝑍))
30	29	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹) = ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ 𝑍))
31	3	eleq2i 2853	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
32	31	bilani 510	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
33	32	uzinico2 46517	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (ℤ≥‘𝑛) = ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∩ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
34	27, 30, 33	3eqtr4a 2822	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹) = (ℤ≥‘𝑛))
35	34	reseq2d 5970	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹 ↾ ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹)) = (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)))
36	25, 35	eqtr3id 2810	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)))
37	36	rneqd 5920	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ran (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)))
38	22, 24, 37	3eqtrd 2800	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)))
39	38	supeq1d 9422	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) = sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < ))
40	39	mpteq2dva 5198	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )))
41	18, 40	eqtrid 2808	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )))
42	41	rneqd 5920	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )))
43	13, 42	eqtrd 2796	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) “ 𝑍) = ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )))
44	43	infeq1d 9454	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(((𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) “ 𝑍), ℝ*, < ) = inf(ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
45		fveq2 6877	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → (ℤ≥‘𝑛) = (ℤ≥‘𝑘))
46	45	reseq2d 5970	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)) = (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)))
47	46	rneqd 5920	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)))
48	47	supeq1d 9422	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < ) = sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < ))
49	48	cbvmptv 5209	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < ))
50	49	rneqi 5919	. . . 4 ⊢ ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )) = ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < ))
51	50	infeq1i 9455	. . 3 ⊢ inf(ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < )
52	51	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
53	12, 44, 52	3eqtrd 2800	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3451   ∩ cin 3898   ⊆ wss 3899   ↦ cmpt 5186  dom cdm 5651  ran crn 5652   ↾ cres 5653   “ cima 5654  ⟶wf 6527  ‘cfv 6531  (class class class)co 7412  supcsup 9416  infcinf 9417  ℝcr 11180  +∞cpnf 11321  ℝ^*cxr 11323   < clt 11324  ℤcz 12674  ℤ_≥cuz 12946  [,)cico 13459  lim supclsp 15617

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740  ax-cnex 11237  ax-resscn 11238  ax-1cn 11239  ax-icn 11240  ax-addcl 11241  ax-addrcl 11242  ax-mulcl 11243  ax-mulrcl 11244  ax-mulcom 11245  ax-addass 11246  ax-mulass 11247  ax-distr 11248  ax-i2m1 11249  ax-1ne0 11250  ax-1rid 11251  ax-rnegex 11252  ax-rrecex 11253  ax-cnre 11254  ax-pre-lttri 11255  ax-pre-lttrn 11256  ax-pre-ltadd 11257  ax-pre-mulgt0 11258  ax-pre-sup 11259

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-nel 3063  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5546  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-we 5606  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-pred 6297  df-ord 6358  df-on 6359  df-lim 6360  df-suc 6361  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-om 7867  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-frecs 8283  df-wrecs 8314  df-recs 8363  df-rdg 8402  df-er 8701  df-en 8958  df-dom 8959  df-sdom 8960  df-sup 9418  df-inf 9419  df-pnf 11326  df-mnf 11327  df-xr 11328  df-ltxr 11329  df-le 11330  df-sub 11524  df-neg 11525  df-nn 12317  df-n0 12588  df-z 12675  df-uz 12947  df-ico 13463  df-fl 13912  df-limsup 15618

This theorem is used by:  limsupvaluzmpt  46671  limsupvaluz2  46692  limsupgtlem  46731