Theorem limsupvaluz 46544

Description: The superior limit, when the domain of the function is a set of upper integers (the first condition is needed, otherwise the l.h.s. would be -∞ and the r.h.s. would be +∞). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
limsupvaluz.m	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)
limsupvaluz.z	⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)
limsupvaluz.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
limsupvaluz	⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑘,𝐹   𝑘,𝑍

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑘)   𝑀(𝑘)

Proof of Theorem limsupvaluz

Dummy variables 𝑖 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2762	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
2		limsupvaluz.f	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)
3		limsupvaluz.z	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)
4	3	fvexi 6896	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V
5	4	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ V)
6	2, 5	fexd 7230	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
7	3	uzssre2 46243	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑍 ⊆ ℝ
8	7	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ ℝ)
9		limsupvaluz.m	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)
10	3	uzsup 13928	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → sup(𝑍, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)
11	9, 10	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝑍, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)
12	1, 6, 8, 11	limsupval2 15571	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(((𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) “ 𝑍), ℝ*, < ))
13	8	mptimass 6073	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) “ 𝑍) = ran (𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )))
14		oveq1 7424	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑛 → (𝑖[,)+∞) = (𝑛[,)+∞))
15	14	imaeq2d 6060	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑛 → (𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) = (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
16	15	ineq1d 4168	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑛 → ((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*))
17	16	supeq1d 9420	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑛 → sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) = sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
18	17	cbvmptv 5213	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
19	2	fimassd 6728	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ⊆ ℝ*)
20		dfss2 3920	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ⊆ ℝ* ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
21	19, 20	sylib 221	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
22	21	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
23		df-ima 5672	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞))
24	23	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
25		resindm 6027	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐹 ↾ ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹)) = (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞))
26	3	ineq1i 4165	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ (𝑍 ∩ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∩ (𝑛[,)+∞))
27	26	ineqcomi 4160	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ 𝑍) = ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∩ (𝑛[,)+∞))
28	2	fdmd 6717	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 = 𝑍)
29	28	ineq2d 4169	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹) = ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ 𝑍))
30	29	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹) = ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ 𝑍))
31	3	eleq2i 2854	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
32	31	bilani 510	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
33	32	uzinico2 46399	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (ℤ≥‘𝑛) = ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∩ (𝑛[,)+∞)))
34	27, 30, 33	3eqtr4a 2823	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹) = (ℤ≥‘𝑛))
35	34	reseq2d 5976	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹 ↾ ((𝑛[,)+∞) ∩ dom 𝐹)) = (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)))
36	25, 35	eqtr3id 2811	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)))
37	36	rneqd 5926	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ran (𝐹 ↾ (𝑛[,)+∞)) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)))
38	22, 24, 37	3eqtrd 2801	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → ((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)))
39	38	supeq1d 9420	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) = sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < ))
40	39	mpteq2dva 5202	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )))
41	18, 40	eqtrid 2809	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )))
42	41	rneqd 5926	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )))
43	13, 42	eqtrd 2797	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) “ 𝑍) = ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )))
44	43	infeq1d 9452	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(((𝑖 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑖[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) “ 𝑍), ℝ*, < ) = inf(ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
45		fveq2 6882	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → (ℤ≥‘𝑛) = (ℤ≥‘𝑘))
46	45	reseq2d 5976	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)) = (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)))
47	46	rneqd 5926	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)) = ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)))
48	47	supeq1d 9420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < ) = sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < ))
49	48	cbvmptv 5213	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < ))
50	49	rneqi 5925	. . . 4 ⊢ ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )) = ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < ))
51	50	infeq1i 9453	. . 3 ⊢ inf(ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < )
52	51	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(ran (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑛)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
53	12, 44, 52	3eqtrd 2801	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3453   ∩ cin 3901   ⊆ wss 3902   ↦ cmpt 5190  dom cdm 5659  ran crn 5660   ↾ cres 5661   “ cima 5662  ⟶wf 6533  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7417  supcsup 9414  infcinf 9415  ℝcr 11127  +∞cpnf 11268  ℝ^*cxr 11270   < clt 11271  ℤcz 12619  ℤ_≥cuz 12891  [,)cico 13404  lim supclsp 15561

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740  ax-cnex 11184  ax-resscn 11185  ax-1cn 11186  ax-icn 11187  ax-addcl 11188  ax-addrcl 11189  ax-mulcl 11190  ax-mulrcl 11191  ax-mulcom 11192  ax-addass 11193  ax-mulass 11194  ax-distr 11195  ax-i2m1 11196  ax-1ne0 11197  ax-1rid 11198  ax-rnegex 11199  ax-rrecex 11200  ax-cnre 11201  ax-pre-lttri 11202  ax-pre-lttrn 11203  ax-pre-ltadd 11204  ax-pre-mulgt0 11205  ax-pre-sup 11206

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-nel 3064  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3367  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7374  df-ov 7420  df-oprab 7421  df-mpo 7422  df-om 7867  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-frecs 8284  df-wrecs 8315  df-recs 8364  df-rdg 8403  df-er 8700  df-en 8957  df-dom 8958  df-sdom 8959  df-sup 9416  df-inf 9417  df-pnf 11273  df-mnf 11274  df-xr 11275  df-ltxr 11276  df-le 11277  df-sub 11471  df-neg 11472  df-nn 12262  df-n0 12533  df-z 12620  df-uz 12892  df-ico 13408  df-fl 13857  df-limsup 15562

This theorem is used by:  limsupvaluzmpt  46553  limsupvaluz2  46574  limsupgtlem  46613