Theorem ramsey 16937

Description: Ramsey's theorem with the definition of Ramsey (df-ram 16908) eliminated. If 𝑀 is an integer, 𝑅 is a specified finite set of colors, and 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ₀ is a set of lower bounds for each color, then there is an 𝑛 such that for every set 𝑠 of size greater than 𝑛 and every coloring 𝑓 of the set (𝑠𝐶𝑀) of all 𝑀-element subsets of 𝑠, there is a color 𝑐 and a subset 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑠 such that 𝑥 is larger than 𝐹(𝑐) and the 𝑀 -element subsets of 𝑥 are monochromatic with color 𝑐. This is the hypergraph version of Ramsey's theorem; the version for simple graphs is the case 𝑀 = 2. This is Metamath 100 proof #31. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ramsey.c	⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ramsey	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐}))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝑐,𝑛,𝑠,𝑥,𝐹   𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛,𝑠,𝑥,𝑀   𝑅,𝑐,𝑓,𝑛,𝑠,𝑥   𝐶,𝑐,𝑓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐶(𝑖,𝑛,𝑠,𝑎,𝑏)   𝑅(𝑖,𝑎,𝑏)   𝐹(𝑖,𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem ramsey

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ramcl 16936	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ ℕ0)
2		ramsey.c	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})
3		eqid 2731	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))}
4	2, 3	ramtcl2 16918	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → ((𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ ℕ0 ↔ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))} ≠ ∅))
5	1, 4	mpbid 232	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))} ≠ ∅)
6		rabn0 4334	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐}))))
7	5, 6	sylib 218	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐}))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2928  ∀wral 3047  ∃wrex 3056  {crab 3395  Vcvv 3436   ⊆ wss 3897  ∅c0 4278  𝒫 cpw 4545  {csn 4571   class class class wbr 5086  ^◡ccnv 5610   “ cima 5614  ⟶wf 6472  ‘cfv 6476  (class class class)co 7341   ∈ cmpo 7343   ↑_m cmap 8745  Fincfn 8864   ≤ cle 11142  ℕ₀cn0 12376  ♯chash 14232   Ramsey cram 16906

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5212  ax-sep 5229  ax-nul 5239  ax-pow 5298  ax-pr 5365  ax-un 7663  ax-inf2 9526  ax-cnex 11057  ax-resscn 11058  ax-1cn 11059  ax-icn 11060  ax-addcl 11061  ax-addrcl 11062  ax-mulcl 11063  ax-mulrcl 11064  ax-mulcom 11065  ax-addass 11066  ax-mulass 11067  ax-distr 11068  ax-i2m1 11069  ax-1ne0 11070  ax-1rid 11071  ax-rnegex 11072  ax-rrecex 11073  ax-cnre 11074  ax-pre-lttri 11075  ax-pre-lttrn 11076  ax-pre-ltadd 11077  ax-pre-mulgt0 11078  ax-pre-sup 11079

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-nel 3033  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rmo 3346  df-reu 3347  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-csb 3846  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-pss 3917  df-nul 4279  df-if 4471  df-pw 4547  df-sn 4572  df-pr 4574  df-op 4578  df-uni 4855  df-int 4893  df-iun 4938  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-tr 5194  df-id 5506  df-eprel 5511  df-po 5519  df-so 5520  df-fr 5564  df-se 5565  df-we 5566  df-xp 5617  df-rel 5618  df-cnv 5619  df-co 5620  df-dm 5621  df-rn 5622  df-res 5623  df-ima 5624  df-pred 6243  df-ord 6304  df-on 6305  df-lim 6306  df-suc 6307  df-iota 6432  df-fun 6478  df-fn 6479  df-f 6480  df-f1 6481  df-fo 6482  df-f1o 6483  df-fv 6484  df-isom 6485  df-riota 7298  df-ov 7344  df-oprab 7345  df-mpo 7346  df-om 7792  df-1st 7916  df-2nd 7917  df-frecs 8206  df-wrecs 8237  df-recs 8286  df-rdg 8324  df-1o 8380  df-oadd 8384  df-er 8617  df-map 8747  df-en 8865  df-dom 8866  df-sdom 8867  df-fin 8868  df-sup 9321  df-inf 9322  df-oi 9391  df-dju 9789  df-card 9827  df-pnf 11143  df-mnf 11144  df-xr 11145  df-ltxr 11146  df-le 11147  df-sub 11341  df-neg 11342  df-div 11770  df-nn 12121  df-2 12183  df-3 12184  df-n0 12377  df-xnn0 12450  df-z 12464  df-uz 12728  df-rp 12886  df-ico 13246  df-fz 13403  df-fzo 13550  df-seq 13904  df-exp 13964  df-fac 14176  df-bc 14205  df-hash 14233  df-cj 15001  df-re 15002  df-im 15003  df-sqrt 15137  df-abs 15138  df-clim 15390  df-sum 15589  df-ram 16908

This theorem is referenced by: (None)