![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 170 of 454) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-28701) |
![]() (28702-30224) |
![]() (30225-45333) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | mrieqvd 16901* | In a Moore system, a set is independent if and only if, for all elements of the set, the closure of the set with the element removed is unequal to the closure of the original set. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})) ≠ (𝑁‘𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | mrieqv2d 16902* | In a Moore system, a set is independent if and only if all its proper subsets have closure properly contained in the closure of the set. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑠(𝑠 ⊊ 𝑆 → (𝑁‘𝑠) ⊊ (𝑁‘𝑆)))) | ||
Theorem | mrissmrcd 16903 | In a Moore system, if an independent set is between a set and its closure, the two sets are equal (since the two sets must have equal closures by mressmrcd 16890, and so are equal by mrieqv2d 16902.) (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | mrissmrid 16904 | In a Moore system, subsets of independent sets are independent. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) | ||
Theorem | mreexd 16905* | In a Moore system, the closure operator is said to have the exchange property if, for all elements 𝑦 and 𝑧 of the base set and subsets 𝑆 of the base set such that 𝑧 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∪ {𝑦}) but not in the closure of 𝑆, 𝑦 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∪ {𝑧}) (Definition 3.1.9 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 57 to 58.) This theorem allows us to construct substitution instances of this definition. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∪ {𝑌}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∪ {𝑍}))) | ||
Theorem | mreexmrid 16906* | In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if a set is independent and an element is not in its closure, then adding the element to the set gives another independent set. Lemma 4.1.5 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 84. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∪ {𝑌}) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
Theorem | mreexexlemd 16907* | This lemma is used to generate substitution instances of the induction hypothesis in mreexexd 16911. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≈ 𝐾 ∨ 𝐺 ≈ 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑡∀𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ 𝑡)∀𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ 𝑡)(((𝑢 ≈ 𝐾 ∨ 𝑣 ≈ 𝐾) ∧ 𝑢 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝑣 ∪ 𝑡)) ∧ (𝑢 ∪ 𝑡) ∈ 𝐼) → ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣(𝑢 ≈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑖 ∪ 𝑡) ∈ 𝐼))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | mreexexlem2d 16908* | Used in mreexexlem4d 16910 to prove the induction step in mreexexd 16911. See the proof of Proposition 4.2.1 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 86 to 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 (¬ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐹 ∖ {𝑌}) ∧ ((𝐹 ∖ {𝑌}) ∪ (𝐻 ∪ {𝑔})) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | mreexexlem3d 16909* | Base case of the induction in mreexexd 16911. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = ∅ ∨ 𝐺 = ∅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑖 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | mreexexlem4d 16910* | Induction step of the induction in mreexexd 16911. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀ℎ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ ℎ)∀𝑔 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ ℎ)(((𝑓 ≈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑔 ≈ 𝐿) ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝑔 ∪ ℎ)) ∧ (𝑓 ∪ ℎ) ∈ 𝐼) → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝑔(𝑓 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ ℎ) ∈ 𝐼))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≈ suc 𝐿 ∨ 𝐺 ≈ suc 𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | mreexexd 16911* | Exchange-type theorem. In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if 𝐹 and 𝐺 are disjoint from 𝐻, (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) is independent, 𝐹 is contained in the closure of (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻), and either 𝐹 or 𝐺 is finite, then there is a subset 𝑞 of 𝐺 equinumerous to 𝐹 such that (𝑞 ∪ 𝐻) is independent. This implies the case of Proposition 4.2.1 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 86 where either (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) or (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) is finite. The theorem is proven by induction using mreexexlem3d 16909 for the base case and mreexexlem4d 16910 for the induction step. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) Remove dependencies on ax-rep 5154 and ax-ac2 9874. (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ Fin ∨ 𝐺 ∈ Fin)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑞 ∧ (𝑞 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | mreexdomd 16912* | In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if 𝑆 is independent and contained in the closure of 𝑇, and either 𝑆 or 𝑇 is finite, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This is an immediate consequence of mreexexd 16911. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ Fin ∨ 𝑇 ∈ Fin)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | mreexfidimd 16913* | In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is finite, then they are equinumerous. Proven by using mreexdomd 16912 twice. This implies a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | isacs 16914* | A set is an algebraic closure system iff it is specified by some function of the finite subsets, such that a set is closed iff it does not expand under the operation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝒫 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∪ (𝑓 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝑠)))) | ||
Theorem | acsmre 16915 | Algebraic closure systems are closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | isacs2 16916* | In the definition of an algebraic closure system, we may always take the operation being closed over as the Moore closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑠))) | ||
Theorem | acsfiel 16917* | A set is closed in an algebraic closure system iff it contains all closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | acsfiel2 16918* | A set is closed in an algebraic closure system iff it contains all closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | acsmred 16919 | An algebraic closure system is also a Moore system. Deduction form of acsmre 16915. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | isacs1i 16920* | A closure system determined by a function is a closure system and algebraic. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝒫 𝑋) → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝑠} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | mreacs 16921 | Algebraicity is a composable property; combining several algebraic closure properties gives another. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (ACS‘𝑋) ∈ (Moore‘𝒫 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | acsfn 16922* | Algebraicity of a conditional point closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Fin)) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑎)} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | acsfn0 16923* | Algebraicity of a point closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | acsfn1 16924* | Algebraicity of a one-argument closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | acsfn1c 16925* | Algebraicity of a one-argument closure condition with additional constant. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | acsfn2 16926* | Algebraicity of a two-argument closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
Syntax | ccat 16927 | Extend class notation with the class of categories. |
class Cat | ||
Syntax | ccid 16928 | Extend class notation with the identity arrow of a category. |
class Id | ||
Syntax | chomf 16929 | Extend class notation to include functionalized Hom-set extractor. |
class Homf | ||
Syntax | ccomf 16930 | Extend class notation to include functionalized composition operation. |
class compf | ||
Definition | df-cat 16931* | A category is an abstraction of a structure (a group, a topology, an order...) Category theory consists in finding new formulation of the concepts associated with those structures (product, substructure...) using morphisms instead of the belonging relation. That trick has the interesting property that heterogeneous structures like topologies or groups for instance become comparable. Definition in [Lang] p. 53. In contrast to definition 3.1 of [Adamek] p. 21, where "A category is a quadruple A = (O, hom, id, o)", a category is defined as an extensible structure consisting of three slots: the objects "O" ((Base‘𝑐)), the morphisms "hom" ((Hom ‘𝑐)) and the composition law "o" ((comp‘𝑐)). The identities "id" are defined by their properties related to morphisms and their composition, see condition 3.1(b) in [Adamek] p. 21 and df-cid 16932. (Note: in category theory morphisms are also called arrows.) (Contributed by FL, 24-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Cat = {𝑐 ∣ [(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏][(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ][(comp‘𝑐) / 𝑜]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑥)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑥〉𝑜𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉𝑜𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑧)((𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉𝑜𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑧ℎ𝑤)((𝑘(〈𝑦, 𝑧〉𝑜𝑤)𝑔)(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉𝑜𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(〈𝑥, 𝑧〉𝑜𝑤)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉𝑜𝑧)𝑓))))} | ||
Definition | df-cid 16932* | Define the category identity arrow. Since it is uniquely defined when it exists, we do not need to add it to the data of the category, and instead extract it by uniqueness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Id = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ⦌⦋(comp‘𝑐) / 𝑜⦌(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑥)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑥〉𝑜𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉𝑜𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓)))) | ||
Definition | df-homf 16933* | Define the functionalized Hom-set operator, which is exactly like Hom but is guaranteed to be a function on the base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Homf = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦))) | ||
Definition | df-comf 16934* | Define the functionalized composition operator, which is exactly like comp but is guaranteed to be a function of the proper type. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ compf = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑐) × (Base‘𝑐)), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑔(𝑥(comp‘𝑐)𝑦)𝑓)))) | ||
Theorem | iscat 16935* | The predicate "is a category". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧)((𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)((𝑘(〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)𝑔)(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓)))))) | ||
Theorem | iscatd 16936* | Properties that determine a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥))) → ( 1 (〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦))) → (𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 · 𝑦) 1 ) = 𝑓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧))) → (𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤))) → ((𝑘(〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)𝑔)(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | catidex 16937* | Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓)) | ||
Theorem | catideu 16938* | Each object in a category has a unique identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓)) | ||
Theorem | cidfval 16939* | Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓)))) | ||
Theorem | cidval 16940* | Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑋〉 · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))) | ||
Theorem | cidffn 16941 | The identity arrow construction is a function on categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Id Fn Cat | ||
Theorem | cidfn 16942 | The identity arrow operator is a function from objects to arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → 1 Fn 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | catidd 16943* | Deduce the identity arrow in a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥))) → ( 1 (〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦))) → (𝑓(〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 · 𝑦) 1 ) = 𝑓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 1 )) | ||
Theorem | iscatd2 16944* | Version of iscatd 16936 with a uniform assumption list, for increased proof sharing capabilities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ( 1 (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑦)𝑓) = 𝑓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑔(〈𝑦, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧) 1 ) = 𝑔) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝑘(〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)𝑔)(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 · 𝑤)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 1 ))) | ||
Theorem | catidcl 16945 | Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | catlid 16946 | Left identity property of an identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 1 ‘𝑌)(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑌)𝐹) = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | catrid 16947 | Right identity property of an identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(〈𝑋, 𝑋〉 · 𝑌)( 1 ‘𝑋)) = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | catcocl 16948 | Closure of a composition arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | catass 16949 | Associativity of composition in a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾(〈𝑌, 𝑍〉 · 𝑊)𝐺)(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)𝐹) = (𝐾(〈𝑋, 𝑍〉 · 𝑊)(𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹))) | ||
Theorem | 0catg 16950 | Any structure with an empty set of objects is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∅ = (Base‘𝐶)) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | 0cat 16951 | The empty set is a category, the empty category, see example 3.3(4.c) in [Adamek] p. 24. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ∅ ∈ Cat | ||
Theorem | homffval 16952* | Value of the functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-Mar-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | fnhomeqhomf 16953 | If the Hom-set operation is a function it is equal to the corresponding functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by AV, 1-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) → 𝐹 = 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | homfval 16954 | Value of the functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) = (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | homffn 16955 | The functionalized Hom-set operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | homfeq 16956* | Condition for two categories with the same base to have the same hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐻𝑦) = (𝑥𝐽𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | homfeqd 16957 | If two structures have the same Hom slot, they have the same Hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | homfeqbas 16958 | Deduce equality of base sets from equality of Hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | homfeqval 16959 | Value of the functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑋𝐽𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | comfffval 16960* | Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-Mar-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐻𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑔(𝑥 · 𝑦)𝑓))) | ||
Theorem | comffval 16961* | Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉𝑂𝑍) = (𝑔 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍), 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ (𝑔(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝑓))) | ||
Theorem | comfval 16962 | Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉𝑂𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | comfffval2 16963* | Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐻𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑔(𝑥 · 𝑦)𝑓))) | ||
Theorem | comffval2 16964* | Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉𝑂𝑍) = (𝑔 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍), 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ (𝑔(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝑓))) | ||
Theorem | comfval2 16965 | Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉𝑂𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | comfffn 16966 | The functionalized composition operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑂 Fn ((𝐵 × 𝐵) × 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | comffn 16967 | The functionalized composition operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉𝑂𝑍) Fn ((𝑌𝐻𝑍) × (𝑋𝐻𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | comfeq 16968* | Condition for two categories with the same hom-sets to have the same composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧)(𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 · 𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∙ 𝑧)𝑓))) | ||
Theorem | comfeqd 16969 | Condition for two categories with the same hom-sets to have the same composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | comfeqval 16970 | Equality of two compositions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 ∙ 𝑍)𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | catpropd 16971 | Two structures with the same base, hom-sets and composition operation are either both categories or neither. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ Cat)) | ||
Theorem | cidpropd 16972 | Two structures with the same base, hom-sets and composition operation have the same identity function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Id‘𝐶) = (Id‘𝐷)) | ||
Syntax | coppc 16973 | The opposite category operation. |
class oppCat | ||
Definition | df-oppc 16974* | Define an opposite category, which is the same as the original category but with the direction of arrows the other way around. Definition 3.5 of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ oppCat = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑓 sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), tpos (Hom ‘𝑓)〉) sSet 〈(comp‘ndx), (𝑢 ∈ ((Base‘𝑓) × (Base‘𝑓)), 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑓) ↦ tpos (〈𝑧, (2nd ‘𝑢)〉(comp‘𝑓)(1st ‘𝑢)))〉)) | ||
Theorem | oppcval 16975* | Value of the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑂 = ((𝐶 sSet 〈(Hom ‘ndx), tpos 𝐻〉) sSet 〈(comp‘ndx), (𝑢 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ tpos (〈𝑧, (2nd ‘𝑢)〉 · (1st ‘𝑢)))〉)) | ||
Theorem | oppchomfval 16976 | Hom-sets of the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑂) | ||
Theorem | oppchom 16977 | Hom-sets of the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝑂)𝑌) = (𝑌𝐻𝑋) | ||
Theorem | oppccofval 16978 | Composition in the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(comp‘𝑂)𝑍) = tpos (〈𝑍, 𝑌〉 · 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | oppcco 16979 | Composition in the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(comp‘𝑂)𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐹(〈𝑍, 𝑌〉 · 𝑋)𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | oppcbas 16980 | Base set of an opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑂) | ||
Theorem | oppccatid 16981 | Lemma for oppccat 16984. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (𝑂 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝑂) = (Id‘𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | oppchomf 16982 | Hom-sets of the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝑂) | ||
Theorem | oppcid 16983 | Identity function of an opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Id‘𝑂) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | oppccat 16984 | An opposite category is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → 𝑂 ∈ Cat) | ||
Theorem | 2oppcbas 16985 | The double opposite category has the same objects as the original category. Intended for use with property lemmas such as monpropd 16999. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘(oppCat‘𝑂)) | ||
Theorem | 2oppchomf 16986 | The double opposite category has the same morphisms as the original category. Intended for use with property lemmas such as monpropd 16999. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘(oppCat‘𝑂)) | ||
Theorem | 2oppccomf 16987 | The double opposite category has the same composition as the original category. Intended for use with property lemmas such as monpropd 16999. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘(oppCat‘𝑂)) | ||
Theorem | oppchomfpropd 16988 | If two categories have the same hom-sets, so do their opposites. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘(oppCat‘𝐶)) = (Homf ‘(oppCat‘𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | oppccomfpropd 16989 | If two categories have the same hom-sets and composition, so do their opposites. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘(oppCat‘𝐶)) = (compf‘(oppCat‘𝐷))) | ||
Syntax | cmon 16990 | Extend class notation with the class of all monomorphisms. |
class Mono | ||
Syntax | cepi 16991 | Extend class notation with the class of all epimorphisms. |
class Epi | ||
Definition | df-mon 16992* | Function returning the monomorphisms of the category 𝑐. JFM CAT1 def. 10. (Contributed by FL, 5-Dec-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Mono = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ⦌(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 Fun ◡(𝑔 ∈ (𝑧ℎ𝑥) ↦ (𝑓(〈𝑧, 𝑥〉(comp‘𝑐)𝑦)𝑔))})) | ||
Definition | df-epi 16993 | Function returning the epimorphisms of the category 𝑐. JFM CAT1 def. 11. (Contributed by FL, 8-Aug-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ Epi = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ tpos (Mono‘(oppCat‘𝑐))) | ||
Theorem | monfval 16994* | Definition of a monomorphism in a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 Fun ◡(𝑔 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑥) ↦ (𝑓(〈𝑧, 𝑥〉 · 𝑦)𝑔))})) | ||
Theorem | ismon 16995* | Definition of a monomorphism in a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝑀𝑌) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 Fun ◡(𝑔 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑋) ↦ (𝐹(〈𝑧, 𝑋〉 · 𝑌)𝑔))))) | ||
Theorem | ismon2 16996* | Write out the monomorphism property directly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝑀𝑌) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑋)∀ℎ ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑋)((𝐹(〈𝑧, 𝑋〉 · 𝑌)𝑔) = (𝐹(〈𝑧, 𝑋〉 · 𝑌)ℎ) → 𝑔 = ℎ)))) | ||
Theorem | monhom 16997 | A monomorphism is a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝑀𝑌) ⊆ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | moni 16998 | Property of a monomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝑀𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑌)𝐺) = (𝐹(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑌)𝐾) ↔ 𝐺 = 𝐾)) | ||
Theorem | monpropd 16999 | If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same monomorphisms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Mono‘𝐶) = (Mono‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | oppcmon 17000 | A monomorphism in the opposite category is an epimorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Epi‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝑀𝑌) = (𝑌𝐸𝑋)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |