P. 170 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 16901-17000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cshws0 16901*	The size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting an empty word is 0. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 = ∅ → (♯‘𝑀) = 0)
Theorem	cshwrepswhash1 16902*	The size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting a nonempty "repeated symbol word" is 1. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑊 = (𝐴 repeatS 𝑁)) → (♯‘𝑀) = 1)
Theorem	cshwshashnsame 16903*	If a word (not consisting of identical symbols) has a length being a prime number, the size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting the original word equals the length of the original word. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ) → (∃𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑊‘0) → (♯‘𝑀) = (♯‘𝑊)))
Theorem	cshwshash 16904*	If a word has a length being a prime number, the size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting the original word equals the length of the original word or 1. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ) → ((♯‘𝑀) = (♯‘𝑊) ∨ (♯‘𝑀) = 1))
6.2.19  Specific prime numbers
Theorem	prmlem0 16905*	Lemma for prmlem1 16907 and prmlem2 16919. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑥↑2) ≤ 𝑁) → ¬ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℙ → ¬ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝐾 + 2) = 𝑀    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ 2 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑥↑2) ≤ 𝑁) → ¬ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	prmlem1a 16906*	A quick proof skeleton to show that the numbers less than 25 are prime, by trial division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 1 < 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ((¬ 2 ∥ 5 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘5)) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑥↑2) ≤ 𝑁) → ¬ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	prmlem1 16907	A quick proof skeleton to show that the numbers less than 25 are prime, by trial division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 1 < 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 < ;25    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	5prm 16908	5 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 5 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	6nprm 16909	6 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ¬ 6 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	7prm 16910	7 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 7 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	8nprm 16911	8 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ¬ 8 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	9nprm 16912	9 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ¬ 9 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	10nprm 16913	10 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 6-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ¬ ;10 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	11prm 16914	11 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;11 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	13prm 16915	13 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;13 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	17prm 16916	17 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;17 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	19prm 16917	19 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;19 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	23prm 16918	23 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;23 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	prmlem2 16919	Our last proving session got as far as 25 because we started with the two "bootstrap" primes 2 and 3, and the next prime is 5, so knowing that 2 and 3 are prime and 4 is not allows to cover the numbers less than 5↑2 = 25. Additionally, nonprimes are "easy", so we can extend this range of known prime/nonprimes all the way until 29, which is the first prime larger than 25. Thus, in this lemma we extend another blanket out to 29↑2 = 841, from which we can prove even more primes. If we wanted, we could keep doing this, but the goal is Bertrand's postulate, and for that we only need a few large primes - we don't need to find them all, as we have been doing thus far. So after this blanket runs out, we'll have to switch to another method (see 1259prm 16935). As a side note, you can see the pattern of the primes in the indentation pattern of this lemma! (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝑁 < ;;841    &   ⊢ 1 < 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 5 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 7 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;11 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;13 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;17 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;19 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;23 ∥ 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	37prm 16920	37 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;37 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	43prm 16921	43 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;43 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	83prm 16922	83 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;83 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	139prm 16923	139 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;139 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	163prm 16924	163 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;163 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	317prm 16925	317 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;317 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	631prm 16926	631 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;631 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	prmo4 16927	The primorial of 4. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (#p‘4) = 6
Theorem	prmo5 16928	The primorial of 5. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (#p‘5) = ;30
Theorem	prmo6 16929	The primorial of 6. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (#p‘6) = ;30
6.2.20  Very large primes
Theorem	1259lem1 16930	Lemma for 1259prm 16935. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑16 = 52𝑁 + 68≡68 and 2↑17≡68 · 2 = 136 in this lemma. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;17) mod 𝑁) = (;;136 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem2 16931	Lemma for 1259prm 16935. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑34 = (2↑17)↑2≡136↑2≡14𝑁 + 870. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;34) mod 𝑁) = (;;870 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem3 16932	Lemma for 1259prm 16935. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑38 = 2↑34 · 2↑4≡870 · 16 = 11𝑁 + 71 and 2↑76 = (2↑34)↑2≡71↑2 = 4𝑁 + 5≡5. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;76) mod 𝑁) = (5 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem4 16933	Lemma for 1259prm 16935. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑306 = (2↑76)↑4 · 4≡5↑4 · 4 = 2𝑁 − 18, 2↑612 = (2↑306)↑2≡18↑2 = 324, 2↑629 = 2↑612 · 2↑17≡324 · 136 = 35𝑁 − 1 and finally 2↑(𝑁 − 1) = (2↑629)↑2≡1↑2 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem5 16934	Lemma for 1259prm 16935. Calculate the GCD of 2↑34 − 1≡869 with 𝑁 = 1259. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ (((2↑;34) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1
Theorem	1259prm 16935	1259 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	2503lem1 16936	Lemma for 2503prm 16939. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑18 = 512↑2 = 104𝑁 + 1832≡1832. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;18) mod 𝑁) = (;;;1832 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	2503lem2 16937	Lemma for 2503prm 16939. Calculate a power mod. We calculate 2↑19 = 2↑18 · 2≡1832 · 2 = 𝑁 + 1161, 2↑38 = (2↑19)↑2≡1161↑2 = 538𝑁 + 1307, 2↑39 = 2↑38 · 2≡1307 · 2 = 𝑁 + 111, 2↑78 = (2↑39)↑2≡111↑2 = 5𝑁 − 194, 2↑156 = (2↑78)↑2≡194↑2 = 15𝑁 + 91, 2↑312 = (2↑156)↑2≡91↑2 = 3𝑁 + 772, 2↑624 = (2↑312)↑2≡772↑2 = 238𝑁 + 270, 2↑1248 = (2↑624)↑2≡270↑2 = 29𝑁 + 313, 2↑1251 = 2↑1248 · 8≡313 · 8 = 𝑁 + 1 and finally 2↑(𝑁 − 1) = (2↑1251)↑2≡1↑2 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	2503lem3 16938	Lemma for 2503prm 16939. Calculate the GCD of 2↑18 − 1≡1831 with 𝑁 = 2503. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ (((2↑;18) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1
Theorem	2503prm 16939	2503 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	4001lem1 16940	Lemma for 4001prm 16944. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑12 = 4096 = 𝑁 + 95, 2↑24 = (2↑12)↑2≡95↑2 = 2𝑁 + 1023, 2↑25 = 2↑24 · 2≡1023 · 2 = 2046, 2↑50 = (2↑25)↑2≡2046↑2 = 1046𝑁 + 1070, 2↑100 = (2↑50)↑2≡1070↑2 = 286𝑁 + 614 and 2↑200 = (2↑100)↑2≡614↑2 = 94𝑁 + 902 ≡902. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;;200) mod 𝑁) = (;;902 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	4001lem2 16941	Lemma for 4001prm 16944. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑400 = (2↑200)↑2≡902↑2 = 203𝑁 + 1401 and 2↑800 = (2↑400)↑2≡1401↑2 = 490𝑁 + 2311 ≡2311. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;;800) mod 𝑁) = (;;;2311 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	4001lem3 16942	Lemma for 4001prm 16944. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑1000 = 2↑800 · 2↑200≡2311 · 902 = 521𝑁 + 1 and finally 2↑(𝑁 − 1) = (2↑1000)↑4≡1↑4 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	4001lem4 16943	Lemma for 4001prm 16944. Calculate the GCD of 2↑800 − 1≡2310 with 𝑁 = 4001. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ (((2↑;;800) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1
Theorem	4001prm 16944	4001 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
PART 7  BASIC STRUCTURES
7.1  Extensible structures
7.1.1  Basic definitions An "extensible structure" (or "structure" in short, at least in this section) is used to define a specific group, ring, poset, and so on. An extensible structure can contain many components. For example, a group will have at least two components (base set and operation), although it can be further specialized by adding other components such as a multiplicative operation for rings (and still remain a group per our definition). Thus, every ring is also a group. This extensible structure approach allows theorems from more general structures (such as groups) to be reused for more specialized structures (such as rings) without having to reprove anything. Structures are common in mathematics, but in informal (natural language) proofs the details are assumed in ways that we must make explicit. An extensible structure is implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs) on a finite (and not necessarily sequential) subset of ℕ. The function's argument is the index of a structure component (such as 1 for the base set of a group), and its value is the component (such as the base set). By convention, we normally avoid direct reference to the hard-coded numeric index and instead use structure component extractors such as ndxid 16996 and strfv 17003. Using extractors makes it easier to change numeric indices and also makes the components' purpose clearer. For example, as noted in ndxid 16996, we can refer to a specific poset with base set 𝐵 and order relation 𝐿 using the extensible structure {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), 𝐿⟩} rather than {⟨1, 𝐵⟩, ⟨;10, 𝐿⟩}. See section header comment mmtheorems.html#cnx 16996 for more details on numeric indices versus the structure component extractors. There are many other possible ways to handle structures. We chose this extensible structure approach because this approach (1) results in simpler notation than other approaches we are aware of, and (2) is easier to do proofs with. We cannot use an approach that uses "hidden" arguments; Metamath does not support hidden arguments, and in any case we want nothing hidden. It would be possible to use a categorical approach (e.g., something vaguely similar to Lean's mathlib). However, instances (the chain of proofs that an 𝑋 is a 𝑌 via a bunch of forgetful functors) can cause serious performance problems for automated tooling, and the resulting proofs would be painful to look at directly (in the case of Lean, they are long past the level where people would find it acceptable to look at them directly). Metamath is working under much stricter conditions than this, and it has still managed to achieve about the same level of flexibility through this "extensible structure" approach. To create a substructure of a given extensible structure, you can simply use the multifunction restriction operator for extensible structures ↾s as defined in df-ress 17040. This can be used to turn statements about rings into statements about subrings, modules into submodules, etc. This definition knows nothing about individual structures and merely truncates the Base set while leaving operators alone. Individual kinds of structures will need to handle this behavior by ignoring operators' values outside the range (like Ring), defining a function using the base set and applying that (like TopGrp), or explicitly truncating the slot before use (like MetSp). For example, the unital ring of integers ℤring is defined in df-zring 20777 as simply ℤring = (ℂfld ↾s ℤ). This can be similarly done for all other subsets of ℂ, which has all the structure we can show applies to it, and this all comes "for free". Should we come up with some new structure in the future that we wish ℂ to inherit, then we change the definition of ℂfld, reprove all the slot extraction theorems, add a new one, and that's it. None of the other downstream theorems have to change. Note that the construct of df-prds 17256 addresses a different situation. It is not possible to have SubGroup and SubRing be the same thing because they produce different outputs on the same input. The subgroups of an extensible structure treated as a group are not the same as the subrings of that same structure. With df-prds 17256 it can actually reasonably perform the task, that is, being the product group given a family of groups, while also being the product ring given a family of rings. There is no contradiction here because the group part of a product ring is a product group. There is also a general theory of "substructure algebras", in the form of df-mre 17393 and df-acs 17396. SubGroup is a Moore collection, as is SubRing, SubRng and many other substructure collections. But it is not useful for picking out a particular collection of interest; SubRing and SubGroup still need to be defined and they are distinct --- nothing is going to select these definitions for us. Extensible structures only work well when they represent concrete categories, where there is a "base set", morphisms are functions, and subobjects are subsets with induced operations. In short, they primarily work well for "sets with (some) extra structure". Extensible structures may not suffice for more complicated situations. For example, in manifolds, ↾s would not work. That said, extensible structures are sufficient for many of the structures that set.mm currently considers, and offer a good compromise for a goal-oriented formalization.
7.1.1.1  Extensible structures as structures with components
Syntax	cstr 16945	Extend class notation with the class of structures with components numbered below 𝐴.
class Struct
Definition	df-struct 16946*	Define a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. This is not a requirement for groups, posets, etc., but it is a useful assumption for component extraction theorems. As mentioned in the section header, an "extensible structure should be implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs)". The current definition, however, is less restrictive: it allows for classes which contain the empty set ∅ to be extensible structures. Because of 0nelfun 6507, such classes cannot be functions. Without the empty set, however, a structure must be a function, see structn0fun 16950: 𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}). Allowing an extensible structure to contain the empty set ensures that expressions like {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩} are structures without asserting or implying that 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶 and 𝐷 are sets (if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is a proper class, then ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅, see opprc 4845). This is used critically in strle1 16957, strle2 16958, strle3 16959 and strleun 16956 to avoid sethood hypotheses on the "payload" sets: without this, ipsstr 17144 and theorems like it will have many sethood assumptions, and may not even be usable in the empty context. Instead, the sethood assumption is deferred until it is actually needed, e.g., ipsbase 17145, which requires that the base set be a set but not any of the other components. Usually, a concrete structure like ℂfld does not contain the empty set, and therefore is a function, see cnfldfun 20715. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Struct = {⟨𝑓, 𝑥⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝑓 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝑓 ⊆ (...‘𝑥))}
Theorem	brstruct 16947	The structure relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Rel Struct
Theorem	isstruct2 16948	The property of being a structure with components in (1st ‘𝑋)...(2nd ‘𝑋). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (...‘𝑋)))
Theorem	structex 16949	A structure is a set. (Contributed by AV, 10-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 Struct 𝑋 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
Theorem	structn0fun 16950	A structure without the empty set is a function. (Contributed by AV, 13-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	isstruct 16951	The property of being a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩ ↔ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁)))
Theorem	structcnvcnv 16952	Two ways to express the relational part of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → ◡◡𝐹 = (𝐹 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	structfung 16953	The converse of the converse of a structure is a function. Closed form of structfun 16954. (Contributed by AV, 12-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun ◡◡𝐹)
Theorem	structfun 16954	Convert between two kinds of structure closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 Struct 𝑋    ⇒   ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝐹
Theorem	structfn 16955	Convert between two kinds of structure closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (1...𝑁))
Theorem	strleun 16956	Combine two structures into one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 Struct ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 Struct ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐵 < 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) Struct ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩
Theorem	strle1 16957	Make a structure from a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐼    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩} Struct ⟨𝐼, 𝐼⟩
Theorem	strle2 16958	Make a structure from a pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐼    &   ⊢ 𝐼 < 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐽    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝑌⟩} Struct ⟨𝐼, 𝐽⟩
Theorem	strle3 16959	Make a structure from a triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐼    &   ⊢ 𝐼 < 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝐽 < 𝐾    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐾    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝑌⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝑍⟩} Struct ⟨𝐼, 𝐾⟩
Theorem	sbcie2s 16960*	A special version of class substitution commonly used for structures. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ([(𝐸‘𝑤) / 𝑎][(𝐹‘𝑤) / 𝑏]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	sbcie3s 16961*	A special version of class substitution commonly used for structures. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐺‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ([(𝐸‘𝑤) / 𝑎][(𝐹‘𝑤) / 𝑏][(𝐺‘𝑤) / 𝑐]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
7.1.1.2  Substitution of components
Syntax	csts 16962	Set components of a structure.
class sSet
Definition	df-sets 16963*	Set a component of an extensible structure. This function is useful for taking an existing structure and "overriding" one of its components. For example, df-ress 17040 adjusts the base set to match its second argument, which has the effect of making subgroups, subspaces, subrings etc. from the original structures. Or df-mgp 19816, which takes a ring and overrides its addition operation with the multiplicative operation, so that we can consider the "multiplicative group" using group and monoid theorems, which expect the operation to be in the +g slot instead of the .r slot. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.)
⊢ sSet = (𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑠 ↾ (V ∖ dom {𝑒})) ∪ {𝑒}))
Theorem	reldmsets 16964	The structure override operator is a proper operator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ Rel dom sSet
Theorem	setsvalg 16965	Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet 𝐴) = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ dom {𝐴})) ∪ {𝐴}))
Theorem	setsval 16966	Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
Theorem	fvsetsid 16967	The value of the structure replacement function for its first argument is its second argument. (Contributed by SO, 12-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) → ((𝐹 sSet ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)‘𝑋) = 𝑌)
Theorem	fsets 16968	The structure replacement function is a function. (Contributed by SO, 12-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹 sSet ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩):𝐴⟶𝐵)
Theorem	setsdm 16969	The domain of a structure with replacement is the domain of the original structure extended by the index of the replacement. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → dom (𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) = (dom 𝐺 ∪ {𝐼}))
Theorem	setsfun 16970	A structure with replacement is a function if the original structure is a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → Fun (𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩))
Theorem	setsfun0 16971	A structure with replacement without the empty set is a function if the original structure without the empty set is a function. This variant of setsfun 16970 is useful for proofs based on isstruct2 16948 which requires Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) for 𝐹 to be an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun (𝐺 ∖ {∅})) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → Fun ((𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	setsn0fun 16972	The value of the structure replacement function (without the empty set) is a function if the structure (without the empty set) is a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.) (Revised by AV, 16-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Struct 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	setsstruct2 16973	An extensible structure with a replaced slot is an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 Struct 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝑌 = ⟨if(𝐼 ≤ (1st ‘𝑋), 𝐼, (1st ‘𝑋)), if(𝐼 ≤ (2nd ‘𝑋), (2nd ‘𝑋), 𝐼)⟩) → (𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) Struct 𝑌)
Theorem	setsexstruct2 16974*	An extensible structure with a replaced slot is an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 Struct 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑦(𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) Struct 𝑦)
Theorem	setsstruct 16975	An extensible structure with a replaced slot is an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2021.) (Revised by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐺 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩) → (𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) Struct ⟨𝑀, if(𝐼 ≤ 𝑁, 𝑁, 𝐼)⟩)
Theorem	wunsets 16976	Closure of structure replacement in a weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 sSet 𝐴) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	setsres 16977	The structure replacement function does not affect the value of 𝑆 away from 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})) = (𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})))
Theorem	setsabs 16978	Replacing the same components twice yields the same as the second setting only. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) = (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	setscom 16979	Component-setting is commutative when the x-values are different. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) = ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
7.1.1.3  Slots
Syntax	cslot 16980	Extend class notation with the slot function.
class Slot 𝐴
Definition	df-slot 16981*	Define the slot extractor for extensible structures. The class Slot 𝐴 is a function whose argument can be any set, although it is meaningful only if that set is a member of an extensible structure (such as a partially ordered set (df-poset 18129) or a group (df-grp 18677)). Note that Slot 𝐴 is implemented as "evaluation at 𝐴". That is, (Slot 𝐴‘𝑆) is defined to be (𝑆‘𝐴), where 𝐴 will typically be an index (which is implemented as a small natural number) of a component of an extensible structure 𝑆. Each extensible structure is a function defined on specific (natural number) "slots", and the function Slot 𝐴 extracts the structure's component as a function value at a particular slot (with index 𝐴). The special "structure" ndx, defined as the identity function restricted to ℕ, can be used to extract the number 𝐴 from a slot, since (Slot 𝐴‘ndx) = 𝐴 (see ndxarg 16995). This is typically used to refer to the number of a slot when defining structures without having to expose the detail of what that number is (for instance, we use the expression (Base‘ndx) in theorems and proofs instead of its hard-coded, numeric value 1), and discourage using the specific definition of slot extractors like Base = Slot 1 (see df-base 17011). Actually, these definitions are used in two basic theorems named *id (theorems of the form 𝐶 = Slot (𝐶‘ndx)) and *ndx (theorems of the form (𝐶‘ndx) = 𝑁) only (see, for example, baseid 17013 and basendx 17019), except additionally in the discouraged theorem baseval 17012 to demonstrate the representations of the value of the base set extractor. The *id theorems are implementation independent equivalents of the definitions by the means of ndxid 16996, but the *ndx theorems still depend on the hard-coded values of the indices. Therefore, the usage of these *ndx theorems is also discouraged (for more details see the section header comment mmtheorems.html#cnx 16996). Example: The group operation is the second component, i.e., the component in the second slot, of a group-like structure 𝐺 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), + ⟩} (see grpstr 17092). The slot extractor +g = Slot 2 (see df-plusg 17073) applied on the structure 𝐺 provides the group operation + = (+g‘𝐺). Expanding the defintions, we get + = (Slot 2‘𝐺) = (𝐺‘2) = (𝐺‘(+g‘ndx)) (for the last equation, see plusgndx 17086). The class Slot cannot be defined as (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓‘𝑥))) because each Slot 𝐴 is a function on the proper class V so is itself a proper class, and the values of functions are sets (fvex 6843). It is necessary to allow proper classes as values of Slot 𝐴 since for instance the class of all (base sets of) groups is proper. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Slot 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥‘𝐴))
Theorem	sloteq 16982	Equality theorem for the Slot construction. The converse holds if 𝐴 (or 𝐵) is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Slot 𝐴 = Slot 𝐵)
Theorem	slotfn 16983	A slot is a function on sets, treated as structures. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 Fn V
Theorem	strfvnd 16984	Deduction version of strfvn 16985. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝑆‘𝑁))
Theorem	strfvn 16985	Value of a structure component extractor 𝐸. Normally, 𝐸 is a defined constant symbol such as Base (df-base 17011) and 𝑁 is the index of the component. 𝑆 is a structure, i.e. a specific member of a class of structures such as Poset (df-poset 18129) where 𝑆 ∈ Poset. Hint: Do not substitute 𝑁 by a specific (positive) integer to be independent of a hard-coded index value. Often, (𝐸‘ndx) can be used instead of 𝑁. Alternatively, use strfv 17003 instead of strfvn 16985. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝑆‘𝑁)
Theorem	strfvss 16986	A structure component extractor produces a value which is contained in a set dependent on 𝑆, but not 𝐸. This is sometimes useful for showing sethood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) ⊆ ∪ ran 𝑆
Theorem	wunstr 16987	Closure of a structure index in a weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑆) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	str0 16988	All components of the empty set are empty sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = Slot 𝐼    ⇒   ⊢ ∅ = (𝐹‘∅)
Theorem	strfvi 16989	Structure slot extractors cannot distinguish between proper classes and ∅, so they can be protected using the identity function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))
Theorem	fveqprc 16990	Lemma for showing the equality of values for functions like slot extractors 𝐸 at a proper class. Extracted from several former proofs of lemmas like zlmlem 20824. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐸‘∅) = ∅    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐹‘𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑋) = (𝐸‘𝑌))
Theorem	oveqprc 16991	Lemma for showing the equality of values for functions like slot extractors 𝐸 at a proper class. Extracted from several former proofs of lemmas like resvlem 31824. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐸‘∅) = ∅    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑋𝑂𝑌)    &   ⊢ Rel dom 𝑂    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑋) = (𝐸‘𝑍))
7.1.1.4  Structure component indices The structure component index extractor ndx, defined in this subsection, is used to get the numeric argument from a defined structure component extractor such as df-base 17011 (see ndxarg 16995). For each defined structure component extractor, there should be a corresponding specific theorem providing its index, like basendx 17019. The usage of these theorems, however, is discouraged since the particular value for the index is an implementation detail. It is generally sufficient to work with (Base‘ndx) instead of the hard-coded index value, and use theorems such as baseid 17013 and basendxnplusgndx 17090. The main circumstance in which it is necessary to look at indices directly is when showing that a set of indices are disjoint (for example in proofs such as cznabel 45928, based on setsnid 17008) or even ordered (in proofs such as lmodstr 17133). The requirement that the indices are distinct is necessary for sets of ordered pairs to be extensible structures, whereas the ordering allows for proofs avoiding the usage of quadradically many inequalities (compare cnfldfun 20715 with cnfldfunALT 20716). As for the inequalities, it is recommended to provide them explicitly as theorems like basendxnplusgndx 17090, whenever they are required. Since these theorems use discouraged slot theorems, they should be placed near the definition of a slot (within the same subsection), so that the range of usages of discouraged theorems is tightly limited. Although there could be quadradically many of them in the total number of indices, much less are actually available (and not much more are expected). As for the ordering, there are some theorems like basendxltplusgndx 17089 providing the less-than relationship between two indices. These theorems are also proved by discouraged theorems, so they should be placed near the definition of a slot (within the same subsection), too. However, since such theorems are rarely used (in structure building theorems *str like rngstr 17106), it is not recommended to provide explicit theorems for all of them, but to use the (discouraged) *ndx theorems as in lmodstr 17133. Therefore, *str theorems generally depend on the hard-coded values of the indices.
Syntax	cnx 16992	Extend class notation with the structure component index extractor.
class ndx
Definition	df-ndx 16993	Define the structure component index extractor. See Theorem ndxarg 16995 to understand its purpose. The restriction to ℕ ensures that ndx is a set. The restriction to some set is necessary since I is a proper class. In principle, we could have chosen ℂ or (if we revise all structure component definitions such as df-base 17011) another set such as the set of finite ordinals ω (df-om 7786). (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ndx = ( I ↾ ℕ)
Theorem	wunndx 16994	Closure of the index extractor in an infinite weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ndx ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	ndxarg 16995	Get the numeric argument from a defined structure component extractor such as df-base 17011. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) = 𝑁
Theorem	ndxid 16996	A structure component extractor is defined by its own index. This theorem, together with strfv 17003 below, is useful for avoiding direct reference to the hard-coded numeric index in component extractor definitions, such as the 1 in df-base 17011 and the ;10 in df-ple 17080, making it easier to change should the need arise. For example, we can refer to a specific poset with base set 𝐵 and order relation 𝐿 using {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), 𝐿⟩} rather than {⟨1, 𝐵⟩, ⟨;10, 𝐿⟩}. The latter, while shorter to state, requires revision if we later change ;10 to some other number, and it may also be harder to remember. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)
Theorem	strndxid 16997	The value of a structure component extractor is the value of the corresponding slot of the structure. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) Use strfvnd 16984 directly with 𝑁 set to (𝐸‘ndx) if possible.
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘(𝐸‘ndx)) = (𝐸‘𝑆))
Theorem	setsidvald 16998	Value of the structure replacement function, deduction version. Hint: Do not substitute 𝑁 by a specific (positive) integer to be independent of a hard-coded index value. Often, (𝐸‘ndx) can be used instead of 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.) (Revised by AV, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ dom 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝑁, (𝐸‘𝑆)⟩))
Theorem	setsidvaldOLD 16999	Obsolete version of setsidvald 16998 as of 17-Oct-2024. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ dom 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (𝑆 sSet ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), (𝐸‘𝑆)⟩))
Theorem	strfvd 17000	Deduction version of strfv 17003. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))