P. 170 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 16901-17000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	1arithlem2 16901*	Lemma for 1arith 16904. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑀‘𝑁)‘𝑃) = (𝑃 pCnt 𝑁))
Theorem	1arithlem3 16902*	Lemma for 1arith 16904. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀‘𝑁):ℙ⟶ℕ0)
Theorem	1arithlem4 16903*	Lemma for 1arith 16904. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑦 ∈ ℙ, (𝑦↑(𝐹‘𝑦)), 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℙ⟶ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 𝑞)) → (𝐹‘𝑞) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝐹 = (𝑀‘𝑥))
Theorem	1arith 16904*	Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a sequence of prime exponents, for which only finitely many primes have nonzero exponent. The function 𝑀 maps the set of positive integers one-to-one onto the set of prime factorizations 𝑅. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀:ℕ–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	1arith2 16905*	Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a finite monotonic 1-based sequence of primes. Every positive integer has a unique prime factorization. Theorem 1.10 in [ApostolNT] p. 17. This is Metamath 100 proof #80. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑔 ∈ 𝑅 (𝑀‘𝑧) = 𝑔
6.2.12  Lagrange's four-square theorem
Syntax	cgz 16906	Extend class notation with the set of gaussian integers.
class ℤ[i]
Definition	df-gz 16907	Define the set of gaussian integers, which are complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are integers. (Note that the [i] is actually part of the symbol token and has no independent meaning.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ℤ[i] = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((ℜ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ)}
Theorem	elgz 16908	Elementhood in the gaussian integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (ℜ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	gzcn 16909	A gaussian integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	zgz 16910	An integer is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	igz 16911	i is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ i ∈ ℤ[i]
Theorem	gznegcl 16912	The gaussian integers are closed under negation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → -𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzcjcl 16913	The gaussian integers are closed under conjugation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → (∗‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzaddcl 16914	The gaussian integers are closed under addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzmulcl 16915	The gaussian integers are closed under multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzreim 16916	Construct a gaussian integer from real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzsubcl 16917	The gaussian integers are closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzabssqcl 16918	The squared norm of a gaussian integer is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	4sqlem5 16919	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	4sqlem6 16920	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (-(𝑀 / 2) ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < (𝑀 / 2)))
Theorem	4sqlem7 16921	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵↑2) ≤ (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2))
Theorem	4sqlem8 16922	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐵↑2)))
Theorem	4sqlem9 16923	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐵↑2) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝐴↑2))
Theorem	4sqlem10 16924	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐵↑2)) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2)))
Theorem	4sqlem1 16925*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. The set 𝑆 is the set of all numbers that are expressible as a sum of four squares. Our goal is to show that 𝑆 = ℕ0; here we show one subset direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ0
Theorem	4sqlem2 16926*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. Change bound variables in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2))))
Theorem	4sqlem3 16927*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. Sufficient condition to be in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem4a 16928*	Lemma for 4sqlem4 16929. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2)) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem4 16929*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. We can express the four-square property more compactly in terms of gaussian integers, because the norms of gaussian integers are exactly sums of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] ∃𝑣 ∈ ℤ[i] 𝐴 = (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + ((abs‘𝑣)↑2)))
Theorem	mul4sqlem 16930*	Lemma for mul4sq 16931: algebraic manipulations. The extra assumptions involving 𝑀 are for a part of 4sqlem17 16938 which needs to know not just that the product is a sum of squares, but also that it preserves divisibility by 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (((abs‘𝐶)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐷)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐶) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵 − 𝐷) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 / 𝑀) · (𝑌 / 𝑀)) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	mul4sq 16931*	Euler's four-square identity: The product of two sums of four squares is also a sum of four squares. This is usually quoted as an explicit formula involving eight real variables; we save some time by working with complex numbers (gaussian integers) instead, so that we only have to work with four variables, and also hiding the actual formula for the product in the proof of mul4sqlem 16930. (For the curious, the explicit formula that is used is ( ∣ 𝑎 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑏 ∣ ↑2)( ∣ 𝑐 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑑 ∣ ↑2) = ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑐 + 𝑏 · 𝑑∗ ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑑 − 𝑏 · 𝑐∗ ∣ ↑2.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem11 16932*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. Use the pigeonhole principle to show that the sets {𝑚↑2 ∣ 𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)} and {-1 − 𝑛↑2 ∣ 𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)} have a common element, mod 𝑃. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	4sqlem12 16933*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. For any odd prime 𝑃, there is a 𝑘 < 𝑃 such that 𝑘𝑃 − 1 is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + 1) = (𝑘 · 𝑃))
Theorem	4sqlem13 16934*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑀 < 𝑃))
Theorem	4sqlem14 16935*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	4sqlem15 16936*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → ((((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐸↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐹↑2)) = 0) ∧ (((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐺↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐻↑2)) = 0)))
Theorem	4sqlem16 16937*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ ((𝑅 = 0 ∨ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑃))))
Theorem	4sqlem17 16938*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	4sqlem18 16939*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. Inductive step, odd prime case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem19 16940*	Lemma for 4sq 16941. The proof is by strong induction - we show that if all the integers less than 𝑘 are in 𝑆, then 𝑘 is as well. In this part of the proof we do the induction argument and dispense with all the cases except the odd prime case, which is sent to 4sqlem18 16939. If 𝑘 is 0, 1, 2, we show 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 directly; otherwise if 𝑘 is composite, 𝑘 is the product of two numbers less than it (and hence in 𝑆 by assumption), so by mul4sq 16931 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ℕ0 = 𝑆
Theorem	4sq 16941*	Lagrange's four-square theorem, or Bachet's conjecture: every nonnegative integer is expressible as a sum of four squares. This is Metamath 100 proof #19. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2))))
6.2.13  Van der Waerden's theorem
Syntax	cvdwa 16942	The arithmetic progression function.
class AP
Syntax	cvdwm 16943	The monochromatic arithmetic progression predicate.
class MonoAP
Syntax	cvdwp 16944	The polychromatic arithmetic progression predicate.
class PolyAP
Definition	df-vdwap 16945*	Define the arithmetic progression function, which takes as input a length 𝑘, a start point 𝑎, and a step 𝑑 and outputs the set of points in this progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ AP = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ ℕ, 𝑑 ∈ ℕ ↦ ran (𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑘 − 1)) ↦ (𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)))))
Definition	df-vdwmc 16946*	Define the "contains a monochromatic AP" predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ MonoAP = {⟨𝑘, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐(ran (AP‘𝑘) ∩ 𝒫 (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})) ≠ ∅}
Definition	df-vdwpc 16947*	Define the "contains a polychromatic collection of APs" predicate. See vdwpc 16957 for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ PolyAP = {⟨⟨𝑚, 𝑘⟩, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℕ ↑m (1...𝑚))(∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑚)((𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))(AP‘𝑘)(𝑑‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {(𝑓‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖)))}) ∧ (♯‘ran (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑚) ↦ (𝑓‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))))) = 𝑚)}
Theorem	vdwapfval 16948*	Define the arithmetic progression function, which takes as input a length 𝑘, a start point 𝑎, and a step 𝑑 and outputs the set of points in this progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 → (AP‘𝐾) = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ, 𝑑 ∈ ℕ ↦ ran (𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1)) ↦ (𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)))))
Theorem	vdwapf 16949	The arithmetic progression function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 → (AP‘𝐾):(ℕ × ℕ)⟶𝒫 ℕ)
Theorem	vdwapval 16950*	Value of the arithmetic progression function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑚 · 𝐷))))
Theorem	vdwapun 16951	Remove the first element of an arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴(AP‘(𝐾 + 1))𝐷) = ({𝐴} ∪ ((𝐴 + 𝐷)(AP‘𝐾)𝐷)))
Theorem	vdwapid1 16952	The first element of an arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷))
Theorem	vdwap0 16953	Value of a length-1 arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴(AP‘0)𝐷) = ∅)
Theorem	vdwap1 16954	Value of a length-1 arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴(AP‘1)𝐷) = {𝐴})
Theorem	vdwmc 16955*	The predicate " The ⟨𝑅, 𝑁⟩-coloring 𝐹 contains a monochromatic AP of length 𝐾". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 MonoAP 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑐∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ (𝑎(AP‘𝐾)𝑑) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐})))
Theorem	vdwmc2 16956*	Expand out the definition of an arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 MonoAP 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))(𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)) ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐})))
Theorem	vdwpc 16957*	The predicate " The coloring 𝐹 contains a polychromatic 𝑀-tuple of AP's of length 𝐾". A polychromatic 𝑀-tuple of AP's is a set of AP's with the same base point but different step lengths, such that each individual AP is monochromatic, but the AP's all have mutually distinct colors. (The common basepoint is not required to have the same color as any of the AP's.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (1...𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑀, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℕ ↑m 𝐽)(∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐽 ((𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝑑‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖)))}) ∧ (♯‘ran (𝑖 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))))) = 𝑀)))
Theorem	vdwlem1 16958*	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑊)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷:(1...𝑀)⟶ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀)((𝐴 + (𝐷‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝐷‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘(𝐴 + (𝐷‘𝑖)))}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘(𝐴 + (𝐷‘𝐼))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝐹)
Theorem	vdwlem2 16959*	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑀)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑊 + 𝑁)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 MonoAP 𝐺 → 𝐾 MonoAP 𝐹))
Theorem	vdwlem3 16960	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (1...𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + (𝑊 · ((𝐴 − 1) + 𝑉))) ∈ (1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉))))
Theorem	vdwlem4 16961*	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑉)⟶(𝑅 ↑m (1...𝑊)))
Theorem	vdwlem5 16962*	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(1...𝑊)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐺}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸:(1...𝑀)⟶ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀)((𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝐸‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ {(𝐺‘(𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖)))}))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘ran 𝐽) = 𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐵 + (𝑊 · ((𝐴 + (𝑉 − 𝐷)) − 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑗 ∈ (1...(𝑀 + 1)) ↦ (if(𝑗 = (𝑀 + 1), 0, (𝐸‘𝑗)) + (𝑊 · 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	vdwlem6 16963*	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(1...𝑊)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐺}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸:(1...𝑀)⟶ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀)((𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝐸‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ {(𝐺‘(𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖)))}))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐵 + (𝐸‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘ran 𝐽) = 𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐵 + (𝑊 · ((𝐴 + (𝑉 − 𝐷)) − 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑗 ∈ (1...(𝑀 + 1)) ↦ (if(𝑗 = (𝑀 + 1), 0, (𝐸‘𝑗)) + (𝑊 · 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨(𝑀 + 1), 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐻 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝐺))
Theorem	vdwlem7 16964*	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(1...𝑊)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐺}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑀, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐺 → (⟨(𝑀 + 1), 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐻 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝐺)))
Theorem	vdwlem8 16965*	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...(2 · 𝑊))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ {𝐶}))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨1, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐹)
Theorem	vdwlem9 16966*	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Fin ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑠 ↑m (1...𝑛))𝐾 MonoAP 𝑓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (1...𝑊))(⟨𝑀, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝑔 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝑔))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑓 ∈ ((𝑅 ↑m (1...𝑊)) ↑m (1...𝑉))𝐾 MonoAP 𝑓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(𝑊 · (2 · 𝑉)))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑉) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑊) ↦ (𝐻‘(𝑦 + (𝑊 · ((𝑥 − 1) + 𝑉))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨(𝑀 + 1), 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐻 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝐻))
Theorem	vdwlem10 16967*	Lemma for vdw 16971. Set up secondary induction on 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Fin ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑠 ↑m (1...𝑛))𝐾 MonoAP 𝑓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (1...𝑛))(⟨𝑀, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝑓 ∨ (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝑓))
Theorem	vdwlem11 16968*	Lemma for vdw 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Fin ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑠 ↑m (1...𝑛))𝐾 MonoAP 𝑓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (1...𝑛))(𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝑓)
Theorem	vdwlem12 16969	Lemma for vdw 16971. 𝐾 = 2 base case of induction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...((♯‘𝑅) + 1))⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 MonoAP 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	vdwlem13 16970*	Lemma for vdw 16971. Main induction on 𝐾; 𝐾 = 0, 𝐾 = 1 base cases. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (1...𝑛))𝐾 MonoAP 𝑓)
Theorem	vdw 16971*	Van der Waerden's theorem. For any finite coloring 𝑅 and integer 𝐾, there is an 𝑁 such that every coloring function from 1...𝑁 to 𝑅 contains a monochromatic arithmetic progression (which written out in full means that there is a color 𝑐 and base, increment values 𝑎, 𝑑 such that all the numbers 𝑎, 𝑎 + 𝑑, ..., 𝑎 + (𝑘 − 1)𝑑 lie in the preimage of {𝑐}, i.e. they are all in 1...𝑁 and 𝑓 evaluated at each one yields 𝑐). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (1...𝑛))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))(𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)) ∈ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐}))
Theorem	vdwnnlem1 16972*	Corollary of vdw 16971, and lemma for vdwnn 16975. If 𝐹 is a coloring of the integers, then there are arbitrarily long monochromatic APs in 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))(𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)) ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐}))
Theorem	vdwnnlem2 16973*	Lemma for vdwnn 16975. The set of all "bad" 𝑘 for the theorem is upwards-closed, because a long AP implies a short AP. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑘 ∈ ℕ ∣ ¬ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑘 − 1))(𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)) ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐})}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆))
Theorem	vdwnnlem3 16974*	Lemma for vdwnn 16975. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑘 ∈ ℕ ∣ ¬ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑘 − 1))(𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)) ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐})}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 𝑆 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	vdwnn 16975*	Van der Waerden's theorem, infinitary version. For any finite coloring 𝐹 of the positive integers, there is a color 𝑐 that contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝑅) → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑘 − 1))(𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)) ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐}))
6.2.14  Ramsey's theorem
Syntax	cram 16976	Extend class notation with the Ramsey number function.
class Ramsey
Theorem	ramtlecl 16977*	The set 𝑇 of numbers with the Ramsey number property is upward-closed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑇 → (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ 𝑇)
Definition	df-ram 16978*	Define the Ramsey number function. The input is a number 𝑚 for the size of the edges of the hypergraph, and a tuple 𝑟 from the finite color set to lower bounds for each color. The Ramsey number (𝑀 Ramsey 𝑅) is the smallest number such that for any set 𝑆 with (𝑀 Ramsey 𝑅) ≤ ♯𝑆 and any coloring 𝐹 of the set of 𝑀-element subsets of 𝑆 (with color set dom 𝑅), there is a color 𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑅 and a subset 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑆 such that 𝑅(𝑐) ≤ ♯𝑥 and all the hyperedges of 𝑥 (that is, subsets of 𝑥 of size 𝑀) have color 𝑐. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ Ramsey = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑟 ∈ V ↦ inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (dom 𝑟 ↑m {𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠 ∣ (♯‘𝑦) = 𝑚})∃𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑟∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝑟‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥((♯‘𝑦) = 𝑚 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = 𝑐)))}, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	hashbcval 16979*	Value of the "binomial set", the set of all 𝑁-element subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴𝐶𝑁) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (♯‘𝑥) = 𝑁})
Theorem	hashbccl 16980*	The binomial set is a finite set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴𝐶𝑁) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	hashbcss 16981*	Subset relation for the binomial set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐵𝐶𝑁) ⊆ (𝐴𝐶𝑁))
Theorem	hashbc0 16982*	The set of subsets of size zero is the singleton of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴𝐶0) = {∅})
Theorem	hashbc2 16983*	The size of the binomial set is the binomial coefficient. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (♯‘(𝐴𝐶𝑁)) = ((♯‘𝐴)C𝑁))
Theorem	0hashbc 16984*	There are no subsets of the empty set with size greater than zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (∅𝐶𝑁) = ∅)
Theorem	ramval 16985*	The value of the Ramsey number function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) = inf(𝑇, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	ramcl2lem 16986*	Lemma for extended real closure of the Ramsey number function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) = if(𝑇 = ∅, +∞, inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	ramtcl 16987*	The Ramsey number has the Ramsey number property if any number does. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → ((𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝑇 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	ramtcl2 16988*	The Ramsey number is an integer iff there is a number with the Ramsey number property. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → ((𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ ℕ0 ↔ 𝑇 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	ramtub 16989*	The Ramsey number is a lower bound on the set of all numbers with the Ramsey number property. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	ramub 16990*	The Ramsey number is a lower bound on the set of all numbers with the Ramsey number property. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑁 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) ∧ 𝑓:(𝑠𝐶𝑀)⟶𝑅)) → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ≤ 𝑁)
Theorem	ramub2 16991*	It is sufficient to check the Ramsey property on finite sets of size equal to the upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((♯‘𝑠) = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑓:(𝑠𝐶𝑀)⟶𝑅)) → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ≤ 𝑁)
Theorem	rami 16992*	The defining property of a Ramsey number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ≤ (♯‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(𝑆𝐶𝑀)⟶𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑆((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ {𝑐})))
Theorem	ramcl2 16993	The Ramsey number is either a nonnegative integer or plus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}))
Theorem	ramxrcl 16994	The Ramsey number is an extended real number. (This theorem does not imply Ramsey's theorem, unlike ramcl 17006.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	ramubcl 16995	If the Ramsey number is upper bounded, then it is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)) → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	ramlb 16996*	Establish a lower bound on a Ramsey number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:((1...𝑁)𝐶𝑀)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (1...𝑁))) → ((𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝐺 “ {𝑐}) → (♯‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑐)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 < (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹))
Theorem	0ram 16997*	The Ramsey number when 𝑀 = 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐹 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → (0 Ramsey 𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐹, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	0ram2 16998	The Ramsey number when 𝑀 = 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑅 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → (0 Ramsey 𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐹, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	ram0 16999	The Ramsey number when 𝑅 = ∅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑀 Ramsey ∅) = 𝑀)
Theorem	0ramcl 17000	Lemma for ramcl 17006: Existence of the Ramsey number when 𝑀 = 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → (0 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ ℕ0)