pjf2 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > pjf2		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem pjf2 20403

Description: A projection is a function from the base set to the subspace. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Oct-2015.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
pjf.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (proj‘𝑊)
pjf.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
pjf2	⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → (𝐾‘𝑇):𝑉⟶𝑇)

**Proof of Theorem pjf2**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2798	. . 3 ⊢ (+_g‘𝑊) = (+_g‘𝑊)
2		eqid 2798	. . 3 ⊢ (LSSum‘𝑊) = (LSSum‘𝑊)
3		eqid 2798	. . 3 ⊢ (0_g‘𝑊) = (0_g‘𝑊)
4		eqid 2798	. . 3 ⊢ (Cntz‘𝑊) = (Cntz‘𝑊)
5		phllmod 20319	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ PreHil → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)
6	5	adantr 484	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)
7		eqid 2798	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (LSubSp‘𝑊) = (LSubSp‘𝑊)
8	7	lsssssubg 19723	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → (LSubSp‘𝑊) ⊆ (SubGrp‘𝑊))
9	6, 8	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → (LSubSp‘𝑊) ⊆ (SubGrp‘𝑊))
10		pjf.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
11		eqid 2798	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ocv‘𝑊) = (ocv‘𝑊)
12		pjf.k	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐾 = (proj‘𝑊)
13	10, 7, 11, 2, 12	pjdm2 20400	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ PreHil → (𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾 ↔ (𝑇 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑊) ∧ (𝑇(LSSum‘𝑊)((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)) = 𝑉)))
14	13	simprbda 502	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → 𝑇 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑊))
15	9, 14	sseldd 3916	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑊))
16	10, 7	lssss 19701	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑊) → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑉)
17	14, 16	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑉)
18	10, 11, 7	ocvlss 20361	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑉) → ((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇) ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑊))
19	17, 18	syldan 594	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → ((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇) ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑊))
20	9, 19	sseldd 3916	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → ((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇) ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑊))
21	11, 7, 3	ocvin 20363	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑊)) → (𝑇 ∩ ((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)) = {(0_g‘𝑊)})
22	14, 21	syldan 594	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → (𝑇 ∩ ((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)) = {(0_g‘𝑊)})
23		lmodabl 19674	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ Abel)
24	6, 23	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → 𝑊 ∈ Abel)
25	4, 24, 15, 20	ablcntzd 18970	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → 𝑇 ⊆ ((Cntz‘𝑊)‘((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)))
26		eqid 2798	. . 3 ⊢ (proj₁‘𝑊) = (proj₁‘𝑊)
27	1, 2, 3, 4, 15, 20, 22, 25, 26	pj1f 18815	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → (𝑇(proj₁‘𝑊)((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)):(𝑇(LSSum‘𝑊)((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇))⟶𝑇)
28	11, 26, 12	pjval 20399	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾 → (𝐾‘𝑇) = (𝑇(proj₁‘𝑊)((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)))
29	28	adantl 485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → (𝐾‘𝑇) = (𝑇(proj₁‘𝑊)((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)))
30	29	eqcomd 2804	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → (𝑇(proj₁‘𝑊)((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)) = (𝐾‘𝑇))
31	13	simplbda 503	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → (𝑇(LSSum‘𝑊)((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)) = 𝑉)
32	30, 31	feq12d 6475	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → ((𝑇(proj₁‘𝑊)((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇)):(𝑇(LSSum‘𝑊)((ocv‘𝑊)‘𝑇))⟶𝑇 ↔ (𝐾‘𝑇):𝑉⟶𝑇))
33	27, 32	mpbid 235	1 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ PreHil ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom 𝐾) → (𝐾‘𝑇):𝑉⟶𝑇)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1538 ∈ wcel 2111 ∩ cin 3880 ⊆ wss 3881 {csn 4525 dom cdm 5519 ⟶wf 6320 ‘cfv 6324 (class class class)co 7135 Basecbs 16475 +_gcplusg 16557 0_gc0g 16705 SubGrpcsubg 18265 Cntzccntz 18437 LSSumclsm 18751 proj₁cpj1 18752 Abelcabl 18899 LModclmod 19627 LSubSpclss 19696 PreHilcphl 20313 ocvcocv 20349 projcpj 20389

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 ax-rep 5154 ax-sep 5167 ax-nul 5174 ax-pow 5231 ax-pr 5295 ax-un 7441 ax-cnex 10582 ax-resscn 10583 ax-1cn 10584 ax-icn 10585 ax-addcl 10586 ax-addrcl 10587 ax-mulcl 10588 ax-mulrcl 10589 ax-mulcom 10590 ax-addass 10591 ax-mulass 10592 ax-distr 10593 ax-i2m1 10594 ax-1ne0 10595 ax-1rid 10596 ax-rnegex 10597 ax-rrecex 10598 ax-cnre 10599 ax-pre-lttri 10600 ax-pre-lttrn 10601 ax-pre-ltadd 10602 ax-pre-mulgt0 10603

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-3or 1085 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2598 df-eu 2629 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-nfc 2938 df-ne 2988 df-nel 3092 df-ral 3111 df-rex 3112 df-reu 3113 df-rmo 3114 df-rab 3115 df-v 3443 df-sbc 3721 df-csb 3829 df-dif 3884 df-un 3886 df-in 3888 df-ss 3898 df-pss 3900 df-nul 4244 df-if 4426 df-pw 4499 df-sn 4526 df-pr 4528 df-tp 4530 df-op 4532 df-uni 4801 df-int 4839 df-iun 4883 df-br 5031 df-opab 5093 df-mpt 5111 df-tr 5137 df-id 5425 df-eprel 5430 df-po 5438 df-so 5439 df-fr 5478 df-we 5480 df-xp 5525 df-rel 5526 df-cnv 5527 df-co 5528 df-dm 5529 df-rn 5530 df-res 5531 df-ima 5532 df-pred 6116 df-ord 6162 df-on 6163 df-lim 6164 df-suc 6165 df-iota 6283 df-fun 6326 df-fn 6327 df-f 6328 df-f1 6329 df-fo 6330 df-f1o 6331 df-fv 6332 df-riota 7093 df-ov 7138 df-oprab 7139 df-mpo 7140 df-om 7561 df-1st 7671 df-2nd 7672 df-wrecs 7930 df-recs 7991 df-rdg 8029 df-er 8272 df-map 8391 df-en 8493 df-dom 8494 df-sdom 8495 df-pnf 10666 df-mnf 10667 df-xr 10668 df-ltxr 10669 df-le 10670 df-sub 10861 df-neg 10862 df-nn 11626 df-2 11688 df-3 11689 df-4 11690 df-5 11691 df-6 11692 df-7 11693 df-8 11694 df-ndx 16478 df-slot 16479 df-base 16481 df-sets 16482 df-ress 16483 df-plusg 16570 df-sca 16573 df-vsca 16574 df-ip 16575 df-0g 16707 df-mgm 17844 df-sgrp 17893 df-mnd 17904 df-grp 18098 df-minusg 18099 df-sbg 18100 df-subg 18268 df-ghm 18348 df-cntz 18439 df-lsm 18753 df-pj1 18754 df-cmn 18900 df-abl 18901 df-mgp 19233 df-ur 19245 df-ring 19292 df-lmod 19629 df-lss 19697 df-lmhm 19787 df-lvec 19868 df-sra 19937 df-rgmod 19938 df-phl 20315 df-ocv 20352 df-pj 20392

This theorem is referenced by: pjfo 20404

W3C validator