Theorem rusgrnumwlkg 30057

Description: In a k-regular graph, the number of walks of a fixed length n from a fixed vertex is k to the power of n. This theorem corresponds to statement 11 in [Huneke] p. 2: "The total number of walks v(0) v(1) ... v(n-2) from a fixed vertex v = v(0) is k^(n-2) as G is k-regular." This theorem even holds for n=0: then the walk consists of only one vertex v(0), so the number of walks of length n=0 starting with v=v(0) is 1=k^0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-Aug-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rusgrnumwwlkg.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rusgrnumwlkg	⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)}) = (𝐾↑𝑁))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑤,𝐺   𝑤,𝐾   𝑤,𝑁   𝑤,𝑃   𝑤,𝑉

Proof of Theorem rusgrnumwlkg

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ovex 7393	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∈ V
2	1	rabex 5285	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃} ∈ V
3		rusgrusgr 29642	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 → 𝐺 ∈ USGraph)
4		usgruspgr 29257	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → 𝐺 ∈ USPGraph)
5	3, 4	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 → 𝐺 ∈ USPGraph)
6		simp3 1139	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
7		wlksnwwlknvbij 29985	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)}–1-1-onto→{𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃})
8	5, 6, 7	syl2an 597	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)}–1-1-onto→{𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃})
9		f1oexbi 7872	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑔 𝑔:{𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃}–1-1-onto→{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)} ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)}–1-1-onto→{𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃})
10	8, 9	sylibr 234	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:{𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃}–1-1-onto→{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)})
11		hasheqf1oi 14278	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃} ∈ V → (∃𝑔 𝑔:{𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃}–1-1-onto→{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)} → (♯‘{𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃}) = (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)})))
12	2, 10, 11	mpsyl 68	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃}) = (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)}))
13		rusgrnumwwlkg.v	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
14	13	rusgrnumwwlkg 30056	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑝 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑝‘0) = 𝑃}) = (𝐾↑𝑁))
15	12, 14	eqtr3d 2774	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)}) = (𝐾↑𝑁))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2114  {crab 3400  Vcvv 3441   class class class wbr 5099  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6492  ‘cfv 6493  (class class class)co 7360  1^st c1st 7933  2^nd c2nd 7934  Fincfn 8887  0cc0 11030  ℕ₀cn0 12405  ↑cexp 13988  ♯chash 14257  Vtxcvtx 29073  USPGraphcuspgr 29225  USGraphcusgr 29226   RegUSGraph crusgr 29634  Walkscwlks 29674   WWalksN cwwlksn 29903

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5225  ax-sep 5242  ax-nul 5252  ax-pow 5311  ax-pr 5378  ax-un 7682  ax-inf2 9554  ax-cnex 11086  ax-resscn 11087  ax-1cn 11088  ax-icn 11089  ax-addcl 11090  ax-addrcl 11091  ax-mulcl 11092  ax-mulrcl 11093  ax-mulcom 11094  ax-addass 11095  ax-mulass 11096  ax-distr 11097  ax-i2m1 11098  ax-1ne0 11099  ax-1rid 11100  ax-rnegex 11101  ax-rrecex 11102  ax-cnre 11103  ax-pre-lttri 11104  ax-pre-lttrn 11105  ax-pre-ltadd 11106  ax-pre-mulgt0 11107  ax-pre-sup 11108

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-ifp 1064  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-nel 3038  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rmo 3351  df-reu 3352  df-rab 3401  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3742  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4481  df-pw 4557  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-uni 4865  df-int 4904  df-iun 4949  df-disj 5067  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-mpt 5181  df-tr 5207  df-id 5520  df-eprel 5525  df-po 5533  df-so 5534  df-fr 5578  df-se 5579  df-we 5580  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636  df-res 5637  df-ima 5638  df-pred 6260  df-ord 6321  df-on 6322  df-lim 6323  df-suc 6324  df-iota 6449  df-fun 6495  df-fn 6496  df-f 6497  df-f1 6498  df-fo 6499  df-f1o 6500  df-fv 6501  df-isom 6502  df-riota 7317  df-ov 7363  df-oprab 7364  df-mpo 7365  df-om 7811  df-1st 7935  df-2nd 7936  df-frecs 8225  df-wrecs 8256  df-recs 8305  df-rdg 8343  df-1o 8399  df-2o 8400  df-oadd 8403  df-er 8637  df-map 8769  df-pm 8770  df-en 8888  df-dom 8889  df-sdom 8890  df-fin 8891  df-sup 9349  df-oi 9419  df-dju 9817  df-card 9855  df-pnf 11172  df-mnf 11173  df-xr 11174  df-ltxr 11175  df-le 11176  df-sub 11370  df-neg 11371  df-div 11799  df-nn 12150  df-2 12212  df-3 12213  df-n0 12406  df-xnn0 12479  df-z 12493  df-uz 12756  df-rp 12910  df-xadd 13031  df-fz 13428  df-fzo 13575  df-seq 13929  df-exp 13989  df-hash 14258  df-word 14441  df-lsw 14490  df-concat 14498  df-s1 14524  df-substr 14569  df-pfx 14599  df-cj 15026  df-re 15027  df-im 15028  df-sqrt 15162  df-abs 15163  df-clim 15415  df-sum 15614  df-vtx 29075  df-iedg 29076  df-edg 29125  df-uhgr 29135  df-ushgr 29136  df-upgr 29159  df-umgr 29160  df-uspgr 29227  df-usgr 29228  df-fusgr 29394  df-nbgr 29410  df-vtxdg 29544  df-rgr 29635  df-rusgr 29636  df-wlks 29677  df-wwlks 29907  df-wwlksn 29908

This theorem is referenced by: (None)