| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 88 of 166) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | ltadd1d 8701 | Addition to both sides of 'less than'. Theorem I.18 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) < (𝐵 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | leadd1d 8702 | Addition to both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | leadd2d 8703 | Addition to both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ltsubaddd 8704 | 'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 < (𝐶 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | lesubaddd 8705 | 'Less than or equal to' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐶 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ltsubadd2d 8706 | 'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 < (𝐵 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | lesubadd2d 8707 | 'Less than or equal to' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ltaddsubd 8708 | 'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 < (𝐶 − 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ltaddsub2d 8709 | 'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 < (𝐶 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | leaddsub2d 8710 | 'Less than or equal to' relationship between and addition and subtraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | subled 8711 | Swap subtrahends in an inequality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lesubd 8712 | Swap subtrahends in an inequality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ (𝐵 − 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltsub23d 8713 | 'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) < 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltsub13d 8714 | 'Less than' relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 < (𝐵 − 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | lesub1d 8715 | Subtraction from both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 − 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | lesub2d 8716 | Subtraction of both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | ltsub1d 8717 | Subtraction from both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) < (𝐵 − 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ltsub2d 8718 | Subtraction of both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | ltadd1dd 8719 | Addition to both sides of 'less than'. Theorem I.18 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) < (𝐵 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ltsub1dd 8720 | Subtraction from both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) < (𝐵 − 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ltsub2dd 8721 | Subtraction of both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | leadd1dd 8722 | Addition to both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | leadd2dd 8723 | Addition to both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | lesub1dd 8724 | Subtraction from both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | lesub2dd 8725 | Subtraction of both sides of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | le2addd 8726 | Adding both side of two inequalities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 + 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | le2subd 8727 | Subtracting both sides of two 'less than or equal to' relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐷) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ltleaddd 8728 | Adding both sides of two orderings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐶 + 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | leltaddd 8729 | Adding both sides of two orderings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐶 + 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | lt2addd 8730 | Adding both side of two inequalities. Theorem I.25 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐶 + 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | lt2subd 8731 | Subtracting both sides of two 'less than' relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐷) < (𝐶 − 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | possumd 8732 | Condition for a positive sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 < (𝐴 + 𝐵) ↔ -𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | sublt0d 8733 | When a subtraction gives a negative result. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < 0 ↔ 𝐴 < 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ltaddsublt 8734 | Addition and subtraction on one side of 'less than'. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 < 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | 1le1 8735 | 1 ≤ 1. Common special case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 16-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 1 ≤ 1 | ||
| Theorem | gt0add 8736 | A positive sum must have a positive addend. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < (𝐴 + 𝐵)) → (0 < 𝐴 ∨ 0 < 𝐵)) | ||
| Syntax | creap 8737 | Class of real apartness relation. |
| class #ℝ | ||
| Definition | df-reap 8738* | Define real apartness. Definition in Section 11.2.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). Although #ℝ is an apartness relation on the reals (see df-ap 8745 for more discussion of apartness relations), for our purposes it is just a stepping stone to defining # which is an apartness relation on complex numbers. On the reals, #ℝ and # agree (apreap 8750). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ #ℝ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥))} | ||
| Theorem | reapval 8739 | Real apartness in terms of classes. Beyond the development of # itself, proofs should use reaplt 8751 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | reapirr 8740 | Real apartness is irreflexive. Part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). Beyond the development of # itself, proofs should use apirr 8768 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | recexre 8741* | Existence of reciprocal of real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 #ℝ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | reapti 8742 | Real apartness is tight. Beyond the development of apartness itself, proofs should use apti 8785. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | recexgt0 8743* | Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)) | ||
| Syntax | cap 8744 | Class of complex apartness relation. |
| class # | ||
| Definition | df-ap 8745* |
Define complex apartness. Definition 6.1 of [Geuvers], p. 17.
Two numbers are considered apart if it is possible to separate them. One common usage is that we can divide by a number if it is apart from zero (see for example recclap 8842 which says that a number apart from zero has a reciprocal). The defining characteristics of an apartness are irreflexivity (apirr 8768), symmetry (apsym 8769), and cotransitivity (apcotr 8770). Apartness implies negated equality, as seen at apne 8786, and the converse would also follow if we assumed excluded middle. In addition, apartness of complex numbers is tight, which means that two numbers which are not apart are equal (apti 8785). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ # = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑢 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 = (𝑟 + (i · 𝑠)) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑡 + (i · 𝑢))) ∧ (𝑟 #ℝ 𝑡 ∨ 𝑠 #ℝ 𝑢))} | ||
| Theorem | ixi 8746 | i times itself is minus 1. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (i · i) = -1 | ||
| Theorem | inelr 8747 | The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | rimul 8748 | A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0) | ||
| Theorem | rereim 8749 | Decomposition of a real number into real part (itself) and imaginary part (zero). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = (𝐵 + (i · 𝐶)))) → (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = 0)) | ||
| Theorem | apreap 8750 | Complex apartness and real apartness agree on the real numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 #ℝ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reaplt 8751 | Real apartness in terms of less than. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | reapltxor 8752 | Real apartness in terms of less than (exclusive-or version). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ⊻ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | 1ap0 8753 | One is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ 1 # 0 | ||
| Theorem | ltmul1a 8754 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ltmul1 8755 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | lemul1 8756 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | reapmul1lem 8757 | Lemma for reapmul1 8758. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | reapmul1 8758 | Multiplication of both sides of real apartness by a real number apart from zero. Special case of apmul1 8951. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 # 0)) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | reapadd1 8759 | Real addition respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) # (𝐵 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | reapneg 8760 | Real negation respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ -𝐴 # -𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reapcotr 8761 | Real apartness is cotransitive. Part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | remulext1 8762 | Left extensionality for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶) → 𝐴 # 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | remulext2 8763 | Right extensionality for real multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) # (𝐶 · 𝐵) → 𝐴 # 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | apsqgt0 8764 | The square of a real number apart from zero is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 # 0) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cru 8765 | The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | apreim 8766 | Complex apartness in terms of real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) # (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | mulreim 8767 | Complex multiplication in terms of real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) · (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷))) = (((𝐴 · 𝐶) + -(𝐵 · 𝐷)) + (i · ((𝐶 · 𝐵) + (𝐷 · 𝐴))))) | ||
| Theorem | apirr 8768 | Apartness is irreflexive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ¬ 𝐴 # 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | apsym 8769 | Apartness is symmetric. This theorem for real numbers is part of Definition 11.2.7(v) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | apcotr 8770 | Apartness is cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | apadd1 8771 | Addition respects apartness. Analogue of addcan 8342 for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐶) # (𝐵 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | apadd2 8772 | Addition respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) # (𝐶 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | addext 8773 | Strong extensionality for addition. Given excluded middle, apartness would be equivalent to negated equality and this would follow readily (for all operations) from oveq12 6019. For us, it is proved a different way. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) # (𝐶 + 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | apneg 8774 | Negation respects apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ -𝐴 # -𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mulext1 8775 | Left extensionality for complex multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) # (𝐵 · 𝐶) → 𝐴 # 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mulext2 8776 | Right extensionality for complex multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) # (𝐶 · 𝐵) → 𝐴 # 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mulext 8777 | Strong extensionality for multiplication. Given excluded middle, apartness would be equivalent to negated equality and this would follow readily (for all operations) from oveq12 6019. For us, it is proved a different way. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) # (𝐶 · 𝐷) → (𝐴 # 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 # 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | mulap0r 8778 | A product apart from zero. Lemma 2.13 of [Geuvers], p. 6. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 0) → (𝐴 # 0 ∧ 𝐵 # 0)) | ||
| Theorem | msqge0 8779 | A square is nonnegative. Lemma 2.35 of [Geuvers], p. 9. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | msqge0i 8780 | A square is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | msqge0d 8781 | A square is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mulge0 8782 | The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵)) → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mulge0i 8783 | The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mulge0d 8784 | The product of two nonnegative numbers is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | apti 8785 | Complex apartness is tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 # 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | apne 8786 | Apartness implies negated equality. We cannot in general prove the converse (as shown at neapmkv 16550), which is the whole point of having separate notations for apartness and negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | apcon4bid 8787 | Contrapositive law deduction for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 # 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | leltap 8788 | ≤ implies 'less than' is 'apart'. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 # 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | gt0ap0 8789 | Positive implies apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → 𝐴 # 0) | ||
| Theorem | gt0ap0i 8790 | Positive means apart from zero (useful for ordering theorems involving division). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (0 < 𝐴 → 𝐴 # 0) | ||
| Theorem | gt0ap0ii 8791 | Positive implies apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 # 0 | ||
| Theorem | gt0ap0d 8792 | Positive implies apart from zero. Because of the way we define #, 𝐴 must be an element of ℝ, not just ℝ*. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0) | ||
| Theorem | negap0 8793 | A number is apart from zero iff its negative is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ -𝐴 # 0)) | ||
| Theorem | negap0d 8794 | The negative of a number apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 # 0) | ||
| Theorem | ltleap 8795 | Less than in terms of non-strict order and apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 # 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ltap 8796 | 'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 # 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | gtapii 8797 | 'Greater than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 # 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ltapii 8798 | 'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 # 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | ltapi 8799 | 'Less than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 # 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | gtapd 8800 | 'Greater than' implies apart. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 # 𝐴) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |