 Home Intuitionistic Logic ExplorerTheorem List (p. 128 of 130) < Previous  Next > Bad symbols? Try the GIF version. Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  ILE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 12701-12800   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement

TheoremdjurclALT 12701 Shortening of djurcl 6889 using djucllem 12699. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Jul-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(𝐶𝐵 → ((inr ↾ 𝐵)‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐴𝐵))

10.2.6  Constructive Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (CZF): Bounded formulas and classes

This section develops constructive Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (CZF) on top of intuitionistic logic. It is a constructive theory in the sense that its logic is intuitionistic and it is predicative. "Predicative" means that new sets can be constructed only from already constructed sets. In particular, the axiom of separation ax-sep 4006 is not predicative (because we cannot allow all formulas to define a subset) and is replaced in CZF by bounded separation ax-bdsep 12774. Because this axiom is weaker than full separation, the axiom of replacement or collection ax-coll 4003 of ZF and IZF has to be strengthened in CZF to the axiom of strong collection ax-strcoll 12872 (which is a theorem of IZF), and the axiom of infinity needs a more precise version, the von Neumann axiom of infinity ax-infvn 12831. Similarly, the axiom of powerset ax-pow 4058 is not predicative (checking whether a set is included in another requires to universally quantifier over that "not yet constructed" set) and is replaced in CZF by the axiom of fullness or the axiom of subset collection ax-sscoll 12877.

In an intuitionistic context, the axiom of regularity is stated in IZF as well as in CZF as the axiom of set induction ax-setind 4412. It is sometimes interesting to study the weakening of CZF where that axiom is replaced by bounded set induction ax-bdsetind 12858.

For more details on CZF, a useful set of notes is

Peter Aczel and Michael Rathjen, CST Book draft. (available at http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~rathjen/book.pdf 12858)

and an interesting article is

Michael Shulman, Comparing material and structural set theories, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Volume 170, Issue 4 (Apr. 2019), 465--504. (available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05204 12858)

I also thank Michael Rathjen and Michael Shulman for useful hints in the formulation of some results.

10.2.6.1  Bounded formulas

The present definition of bounded formulas emerged from a discussion on GitHub between Jim Kingdon, Mario Carneiro and I, started 23-Sept-2019 (see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/1173 and links therein).

In order to state certain axiom schemes of Constructive Zermelo–Fraenkel (CZF) set theory, like the axiom scheme of bounded (or restricted, or Δ0) separation, it is necessary to distinguish certain formulas, called bounded (or restricted, or Δ0) formulas. The necessity of considering bounded formulas also arises in several theories of bounded arithmetic, both classical or intuitonistic, for instance to state the axiom scheme of Δ0-induction.

To formalize this in Metamath, there are several choices to make.

A first choice is to either create a new type for bounded formulas, or to create a predicate on formulas that indicates whether they are bounded. In the first case, one creates a new type "wff0" with a new set of metavariables (ph0 ...) and an axiom "\$a wff ph0 " ensuring that bounded formulas are formulas, so that one can reuse existing theorems, and then axioms take the form "\$a wff0 ( ph0 -> ps0 )", etc. In the second case, one introduces a predicate "BOUNDED " with the intended meaning that "BOUNDED 𝜑 " is a formula meaning that 𝜑 is a bounded formula. We choose the second option, since the first would complicate the grammar, risking to make it ambiguous. (TODO: elaborate.)

A second choice is to view "bounded" either as a syntactic or a semantic property. For instance, 𝑥 is not syntactically bounded since it has an unbounded universal quantifier, but it is semantically bounded since it is equivalent to which is bounded. We choose the second option, so that formulas using defined symbols can be proved bounded.

A third choice is in the form of the axioms, either in closed form or in inference form. One cannot state all the axioms in closed form, especially ax-bd0 12703. Indeed, if we posited it in closed form, then we could prove for instance (𝜑BOUNDED 𝜑) and 𝜑BOUNDED 𝜑) which is problematic (with the law of excluded middle, this would entail that all formulas are bounded, but even without it, too many formulas could be proved bounded...). (TODO: elaborate.)

Having ax-bd0 12703 in inference form ensures that a formula can be proved bounded only if it is equivalent *for all values of the free variables* to a syntactically bounded one. The other axioms (ax-bdim 12704 through ax-bdsb 12712) can be written either in closed or inference form. The fact that ax-bd0 12703 is an inference is enough to ensure that the closed forms cannot be "exploited" to prove that some unbounded formulas are bounded. (TODO: check.) However, we state all the axioms in inference form to make it clear that we do not exploit any over-permissiveness.

Finally, note that our logic has no terms, only variables. Therefore, we cannot prove for instance that 𝑥 ∈ ω is a bounded formula. However, since ω can be defined as "the 𝑦 such that PHI" a proof using the fact that 𝑥 ∈ ω is bounded can be converted to a proof in iset.mm by replacing ω with 𝑦 everywhere and prepending the antecedent PHI, since 𝑥𝑦 is bounded by ax-bdel 12711. For a similar method, see bj-omtrans 12846.

Note that one cannot add an axiom BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴 since by bdph 12740 it would imply that every formula is bounded.

Syntaxwbd 12702 Syntax for the predicate BOUNDED.
wff BOUNDED 𝜑

Axiomax-bd0 12703 If two formulas are equivalent, then boundedness of one implies boundedness of the other. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (BOUNDED 𝜑BOUNDED 𝜓)

Axiomax-bdim 12704 An implication between two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)

Axiomax-bdan 12705 The conjunction of two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)

Axiomax-bdor 12706 The disjunction of two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)

Axiomax-bdn 12707 The negation of a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED ¬ 𝜑

Axiomax-bdal 12708* A bounded universal quantification of a bounded formula is bounded. Note the disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED𝑥𝑦 𝜑

Axiomax-bdex 12709* A bounded existential quantification of a bounded formula is bounded. Note the disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED𝑥𝑦 𝜑

Axiomax-bdeq 12710 An atomic formula is bounded (equality predicate). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥 = 𝑦

Axiomax-bdel 12711 An atomic formula is bounded (membership predicate). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥𝑦

Axiomax-bdsb 12712 A formula resulting from proper substitution in a bounded formula is bounded. This probably cannot be proved from the other axioms, since neither the definiens in df-sb 1719, nor probably any other equivalent formula, is syntactically bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑

Theorembdeq 12713 Equality property for the predicate BOUNDED. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (BOUNDED 𝜑BOUNDED 𝜓)

Theorembd0 12714 A formula equivalent to a bounded one is bounded. See also bd0r 12715. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   (𝜑𝜓)       BOUNDED 𝜓

Theorembd0r 12715 A formula equivalent to a bounded one is bounded. Stated with a commuted (compared with bd0 12714) biconditional in the hypothesis, to work better with definitions (𝜓 is the definiendum that one wants to prove bounded). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   (𝜓𝜑)       BOUNDED 𝜓

Theorembdbi 12716 A biconditional between two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)

Theorembdstab 12717 Stability of a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED STAB 𝜑

Theorembddc 12718 Decidability of a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED DECID 𝜑

Theorembd3or 12719 A disjunction of three bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓    &   BOUNDED 𝜒       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓𝜒)

Theorembd3an 12720 A conjunction of three bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓    &   BOUNDED 𝜒       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓𝜒)

Theorembdth 12721 A truth (a (closed) theorem) is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
𝜑       BOUNDED 𝜑

Theorembdtru 12722 The truth value is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED

Theorembdfal 12723 The truth value is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED

Theorembdnth 12724 A falsity is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
¬ 𝜑       BOUNDED 𝜑

TheorembdnthALT 12725 Alternate proof of bdnth 12724 not using bdfal 12723. Then, bdfal 12723 can be proved from this theorem, using fal 1321. The total number of proof steps would be 17 (for bdnthALT 12725) + 3 = 20, which is more than 8 (for bdfal 12723) + 9 (for bdnth 12724) = 17. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
¬ 𝜑       BOUNDED 𝜑

Theorembdxor 12726 The exclusive disjunction of two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)

Theorembj-bdcel 12727* Boundedness of a membership formula. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑦 = 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝐴𝑥

Theorembdab 12728 Membership in a class defined by class abstraction using a bounded formula, is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED 𝑥 ∈ {𝑦𝜑}

Theorembdcdeq 12729 Conditional equality of a bounded formula is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED CondEq(𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑)

10.2.6.2  Bounded classes

In line with our definitions of classes as extensions of predicates, it is useful to define a predicate for bounded classes, which is done in df-bdc 12731. Note that this notion is only a technical device which can be used to shorten proofs of (semantic) boundedness of formulas.

As will be clear by the end of this subsection (see for instance bdop 12765), one can prove the boundedness of any concrete term using only setvars and bounded formulas, for instance, BOUNDED 𝜑 BOUNDED ⟨{𝑥𝜑}, ({𝑦, suc 𝑧} × ⟨𝑡, ∅⟩)⟩. The proofs are long since one has to prove boundedness at each step of the construction, without being able to prove general theorems like BOUNDED 𝐴BOUNDED {𝐴}.

Syntaxwbdc 12730 Syntax for the predicate BOUNDED.
wff BOUNDED 𝐴

Definitiondf-bdc 12731* Define a bounded class as one such that membership in this class is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
(BOUNDED 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴)

Theorembdceq 12732 Equality property for the predicate BOUNDED. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
𝐴 = 𝐵       (BOUNDED 𝐴BOUNDED 𝐵)

Theorembdceqi 12733 A class equal to a bounded one is bounded. Note the use of ax-ext 2097. See also bdceqir 12734. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   𝐴 = 𝐵       BOUNDED 𝐵

Theorembdceqir 12734 A class equal to a bounded one is bounded. Stated with a commuted (compared with bdceqi 12733) equality in the hypothesis, to work better with definitions (𝐵 is the definiendum that one wants to prove bounded; see comment of bd0r 12715). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   𝐵 = 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝐵

Theorembdel 12735* The belonging of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
(BOUNDED 𝐴BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴)

Theorembdeli 12736* Inference associated with bdel 12735. Its converse is bdelir 12737. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴

Theorembdelir 12737* Inference associated with df-bdc 12731. Its converse is bdeli 12736. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴       BOUNDED 𝐴

Theorembdcv 12738 A setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥

Theorembdcab 12739 A class defined by class abstraction using a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED {𝑥𝜑}

Theorembdph 12740 A formula which defines (by class abstraction) a bounded class is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED {𝑥𝜑}       BOUNDED 𝜑

Theorembds 12741* Boundedness of a formula resulting from implicit substitution in a bounded formula. Note that the proof does not use ax-bdsb 12712; therefore, using implicit instead of explicit substitution when boundedness is important, one might avoid using ax-bdsb 12712. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       BOUNDED 𝜓

Theorembdcrab 12742* A class defined by restricted abstraction from a bounded class and a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED {𝑥𝐴𝜑}

Theorembdne 12743 Inequality of two setvars is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥𝑦

Theorembdnel 12744* Non-membership of a setvar in a bounded formula is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴

Theorembdreu 12745* Boundedness of existential uniqueness.

Remark regarding restricted quantifiers: the formula 𝑥𝐴𝜑 need not be bounded even if 𝐴 and 𝜑 are. Indeed, V is bounded by bdcvv 12747, and (∀𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑) (in minimal propositional calculus), so by bd0 12714, if 𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 were bounded when 𝜑 is bounded, then 𝑥𝜑 would be bounded as well when 𝜑 is bounded, which is not the case. The same remark holds with ∃, ∃!, ∃*. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)

BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED ∃!𝑥𝑦 𝜑

Theorembdrmo 12746* Boundedness of existential at-most-one. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED ∃*𝑥𝑦 𝜑

Theorembdcvv 12747 The universal class is bounded. The formulation may sound strange, but recall that here, "bounded" means "Δ0". (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED V

Theorembdsbc 12748 A formula resulting from proper substitution of a setvar for a setvar in a bounded formula is bounded. See also bdsbcALT 12749. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑

TheorembdsbcALT 12749 Alternate proof of bdsbc 12748. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑

Theorembdccsb 12750 A class resulting from proper substitution of a setvar for a setvar in a bounded class is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑦 / 𝑥𝐴

Theorembdcdif 12751 The difference of two bounded classes is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   BOUNDED 𝐵       BOUNDED (𝐴𝐵)

Theorembdcun 12752 The union of two bounded classes is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   BOUNDED 𝐵       BOUNDED (𝐴𝐵)

Theorembdcin 12753 The intersection of two bounded classes is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   BOUNDED 𝐵       BOUNDED (𝐴𝐵)

Theorembdss 12754 The inclusion of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. Note: apparently, we cannot prove from the present axioms that equality of two bounded classes is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴

Theorembdcnul 12755 The empty class is bounded. See also bdcnulALT 12756. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED

TheorembdcnulALT 12756 Alternate proof of bdcnul 12755. Similarly, for the next few theorems proving boundedness of a class, one can either use their definition followed by bdceqir 12734, or use the corresponding characterizations of its elements followed by bdelir 12737. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
BOUNDED

Theorembdeq0 12757 Boundedness of the formula expressing that a setvar is equal to the empty class. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥 = ∅

Theorembj-bd0el 12758 Boundedness of the formula "the empty set belongs to the setvar 𝑥". (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED ∅ ∈ 𝑥

Theorembdcpw 12759 The power class of a bounded class is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝒫 𝐴

Theorembdcsn 12760 The singleton of a setvar is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED {𝑥}

Theorembdcpr 12761 The pair of two setvars is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED {𝑥, 𝑦}

Theorembdctp 12762 The unordered triple of three setvars is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED {𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧}

Theorembdsnss 12763* Inclusion of a singleton of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED {𝑥} ⊆ 𝐴

Theorembdvsn 12764* Equality of a setvar with a singleton of a setvar is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥 = {𝑦}

Theorembdop 12765 The ordered pair of two setvars is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED𝑥, 𝑦

Theorembdcuni 12766 The union of a setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥

Theorembdcint 12767 The intersection of a setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥

Theorembdciun 12768* The indexed union of a bounded class with a setvar indexing set is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝑦 𝐴

Theorembdciin 12769* The indexed intersection of a bounded class with a setvar indexing set is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝑦 𝐴

Theorembdcsuc 12770 The successor of a setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED suc 𝑥

Theorembdeqsuc 12771* Boundedness of the formula expressing that a setvar is equal to the successor of another. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥 = suc 𝑦

Theorembj-bdsucel 12772 Boundedness of the formula "the successor of the setvar 𝑥 belongs to the setvar 𝑦". (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED suc 𝑥𝑦

Theorembdcriota 12773* A class given by a restricted definition binder is bounded, under the given hypotheses. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   ∃!𝑥𝑦 𝜑       BOUNDED (𝑥𝑦 𝜑)

10.2.7  CZF: Bounded separation

In this section, we state the axiom scheme of bounded separation, which is part of CZF set theory.

Axiomax-bdsep 12774* Axiom scheme of bounded (or restricted, or Δ0) separation. It is stated with all possible disjoint variable conditions, to show that this weak form is sufficient. For the full axiom of separation, see ax-sep 4006. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑎𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))

Theorembdsep1 12775* Version of ax-bdsep 12774 without initial universal quantifier. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))

Theorembdsep2 12776* Version of ax-bdsep 12774 with one disjoint variable condition removed and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 12775 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))

Theorembdsepnft 12777* Closed form of bdsepnf 12778. Version of ax-bdsep 12774 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a non-freeness antecedent, and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 12775 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       (∀𝑥𝑏𝜑 → ∃𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑)))

Theorembdsepnf 12778* Version of ax-bdsep 12774 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a non-freeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. See also bdsepnfALT 12779. Use bdsep1 12775 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
𝑏𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))

TheorembdsepnfALT 12779* Alternate proof of bdsepnf 12778, not using bdsepnft 12777. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
𝑏𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))

Theorembdzfauscl 12780* Closed form of the version of zfauscl 4008 for bounded formulas using bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       (𝐴𝑉 → ∃𝑦𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)))

Theorembdbm1.3ii 12781* Bounded version of bm1.3ii 4009. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝑦𝑥)       𝑥𝑦(𝑦𝑥𝜑)

Theorembj-axemptylem 12782* Lemma for bj-axempty 12783 and bj-axempty2 12784. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-nul 4014 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
𝑥𝑦(𝑦𝑥 → ⊥)

Theorembj-axempty 12783* Axiom of the empty set from bounded separation. It is provable from bounded separation since the intuitionistic FOL used in iset.mm assumes a nonempty universe. See axnul 4013. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-nul 4014 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
𝑥𝑦𝑥

Theorembj-axempty2 12784* Axiom of the empty set from bounded separation, alternate version to bj-axempty 12783. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-nul 4014 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
𝑥𝑦 ¬ 𝑦𝑥

Theorembj-nalset 12785* nalset 4018 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
¬ ∃𝑥𝑦 𝑦𝑥

Theorembj-vprc 12786 vprc 4020 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
¬ V ∈ V

Theorembj-nvel 12787 nvel 4021 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
¬ V ∈ 𝐴

Theorembj-vnex 12788 vnex 4019 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = V

Theorembdinex1 12789 Bounded version of inex1 4022. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝐵    &   𝐴 ∈ V       (𝐴𝐵) ∈ V

Theorembdinex2 12790 Bounded version of inex2 4023. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝐵    &   𝐴 ∈ V       (𝐵𝐴) ∈ V

Theorembdinex1g 12791 Bounded version of inex1g 4024. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝐵       (𝐴𝑉 → (𝐴𝐵) ∈ V)

Theorembdssex 12792 Bounded version of ssex 4025. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   𝐵 ∈ V       (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ V)

Theorembdssexi 12793 Bounded version of ssexi 4026. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   𝐵 ∈ V    &   𝐴𝐵       𝐴 ∈ V

Theorembdssexg 12794 Bounded version of ssexg 4027. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Theorembdssexd 12795 Bounded version of ssexd 4028. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(𝜑𝐵𝐶)    &   (𝜑𝐴𝐵)    &   BOUNDED 𝐴       (𝜑𝐴 ∈ V)

Theorembdrabexg 12796* Bounded version of rabexg 4031. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝐴       (𝐴𝑉 → {𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∈ V)

Theorembj-inex 12797 The intersection of two sets is a set, from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊) → (𝐴𝐵) ∈ V)

Theorembj-intexr 12798 intexr 4035 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
( 𝐴 ∈ V → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)

Theorembj-intnexr 12799 intnexr 4036 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
( 𝐴 = V → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ V)

Theorembj-zfpair2 12800 Proof of zfpair2 4092 using only bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
{𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V

Page List
Jump to page: Contents  1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10700 108 10701-10800 109 10801-10900 110 10901-11000 111 11001-11100 112 11101-11200 113 11201-11300 114 11301-11400 115 11401-11500 116 11501-11600 117 11601-11700 118 11701-11800 119 11801-11900 120 11901-12000 121 12001-12100 122 12101-12200 123 12201-12300 124 12301-12400 125 12401-12500 126 12501-12600 127 12601-12700 128 12701-12800 129 12801-12900 130 12901-12941
 Copyright terms: Public domain < Previous  Next >