| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 127 of 165) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | lcmeq0 12601 | The lcm of two integers is zero iff either is zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = 0 ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmcl 12602 | Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | gcddvdslcm 12603 | The greatest common divisor of two numbers divides their least common multiple. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∥ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmneg 12604 | Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm -𝑁) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | neglcm 12605 | Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (-𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmabs 12606 | The lcm of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑀) lcm (abs‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmgcdlem 12607 | Lemma for lcmgcd 12608 and lcmdvds 12609. Prove them for positive 𝑀, 𝑁, and 𝐾. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) = (abs‘(𝑀 · 𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾)) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∥ 𝐾))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmgcd 12608 |
The product of two numbers' least common multiple and greatest common
divisor is the absolute value of the product of the two numbers. In
particular, that absolute value is the least common multiple of two
coprime numbers, for which (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1.
Multiple methods exist for proving this, and it is often proven either as a consequence of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic or of Bézout's identity bezout 12540; see, e.g., https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_GCD_and_LCM 12540 and https://math.stackexchange.com/a/470827 12540. This proof uses the latter to first confirm it for positive integers 𝑀 and 𝑁 (the "Second Proof" in the above Stack Exchange page), then shows that implies it for all nonzero integer inputs, then finally uses lcm0val 12595 to show it applies when either or both inputs are zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) = (abs‘(𝑀 · 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmdvds 12609 | The lcm of two integers divides any integer the two divide. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∥ 𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmid 12610 | The lcm of an integer and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 lcm 𝑀) = (abs‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | lcm1 12611 | The lcm of an integer and 1 is the absolute value of the integer. (Contributed by AV, 23-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 lcm 1) = (abs‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmgcdnn 12612 | The product of two positive integers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the product of the two integers. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) = (𝑀 · 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmgcdeq 12613 | Two integers' absolute values are equal iff their least common multiple and greatest common divisor are equal. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ↔ (abs‘𝑀) = (abs‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | lcmdvdsb 12614 | Biconditional form of lcmdvds 12609. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾) ↔ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∥ 𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | lcmass 12615 | Associative law for lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑁 lcm 𝑀) lcm 𝑃) = (𝑁 lcm (𝑀 lcm 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | 3lcm2e6woprm 12616 | The least common multiple of three and two is six. This proof does not use the property of 2 and 3 being prime. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 27-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (3 lcm 2) = 6 | ||
| Theorem | 6lcm4e12 12617 | The least common multiple of six and four is twelve. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (6 lcm 4) = ;12 | ||
According to Wikipedia "Coprime integers", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprime_integers (16-Aug-2020) "[...] two integers a and b are said to be relatively prime, mutually prime, or coprime [...] if the only positive integer (factor) that divides both of them is 1. Consequently, any prime number that divides one does not divide the other. This is equivalent to their greatest common divisor (gcd) being 1.". In the following, we use this equivalent characterization to say that 𝐴 ∈ ℤ and 𝐵 ∈ ℤ are coprime (or relatively prime) if (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1. The equivalence of the definitions is shown by coprmgcdb 12618. The negation, i.e. two integers are not coprime, can be expressed either by (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) ≠ 1, see ncoprmgcdne1b 12619, or equivalently by 1 < (𝐴 gcd 𝐵), see ncoprmgcdgt1b 12620. A proof of Euclid's lemma based on coprimality is provided in coprmdvds 12622 (as opposed to Euclid's lemma for primes). | ||
| Theorem | coprmgcdb 12618* | Two positive integers are coprime, i.e. the only positive integer that divides both of them is 1, iff their greatest common divisor is 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (∀𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((𝑖 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑖 ∥ 𝐵) → 𝑖 = 1) ↔ (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | ncoprmgcdne1b 12619* | Two positive integers are not coprime, i.e. there is an integer greater than 1 which divides both integers, iff their greatest common divisor is not 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (∃𝑖 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)(𝑖 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑖 ∥ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) ≠ 1)) | ||
| Theorem | ncoprmgcdgt1b 12620* | Two positive integers are not coprime, i.e. there is an integer greater than 1 which divides both integers, iff their greatest common divisor is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (∃𝑖 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)(𝑖 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑖 ∥ 𝐵) ↔ 1 < (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | coprmdvds1 12621 | If two positive integers are coprime, i.e. their greatest common divisor is 1, the only positive integer that divides both of them is 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐹 gcd 𝐺) = 1) → ((𝐼 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐼 ∥ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐼 ∥ 𝐺) → 𝐼 = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | coprmdvds 12622 | Euclid's Lemma (see ProofWiki "Euclid's Lemma", 10-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclid's_Lemma): If an integer divides the product of two integers and is coprime to one of them, then it divides the other. See also theorem 1.5 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁) ∧ (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1) → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | coprmdvds2 12623 | If an integer is divisible by two coprime integers, then it is divisible by their product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1) → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾) → (𝑀 · 𝑁) ∥ 𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | mulgcddvds 12624 | One half of rpmulgcd2 12625, which does not need the coprimality assumption. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐾 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) ∥ ((𝐾 gcd 𝑀) · (𝐾 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | rpmulgcd2 12625 | If 𝑀 is relatively prime to 𝑁, then the GCD of 𝐾 with 𝑀 · 𝑁 is the product of the GCDs with 𝑀 and 𝑁 respectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1) → (𝐾 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = ((𝐾 gcd 𝑀) · (𝐾 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | qredeq 12626 | Two equal reduced fractions have the same numerator and denominator. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 gcd 𝑄) = 1) ∧ (𝑀 / 𝑁) = (𝑃 / 𝑄)) → (𝑀 = 𝑃 ∧ 𝑁 = 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | qredeu 12627* | Every rational number has a unique reduced form. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ (ℤ × ℕ)(((1st ‘𝑥) gcd (2nd ‘𝑥)) = 1 ∧ 𝐴 = ((1st ‘𝑥) / (2nd ‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | rpmul 12628 | If 𝐾 is relatively prime to 𝑀 and to 𝑁, it is also relatively prime to their product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (((𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1 ∧ (𝐾 gcd 𝑁) = 1) → (𝐾 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | rpdvds 12629 | If 𝐾 is relatively prime to 𝑁 then it is also relatively prime to any divisor 𝑀 of 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ((𝐾 gcd 𝑁) = 1 ∧ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)) → (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | congr 12630* | Definition of congruence by integer multiple (see ProofWiki "Congruence (Number Theory)", 11-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition:Congruence_(Number_Theory)): An integer 𝐴 is congruent to an integer 𝐵 modulo 𝑀 if their difference is a multiple of 𝑀. See also the definition in [ApostolNT] p. 104: "... 𝑎 is congruent to 𝑏 modulo 𝑚, and we write 𝑎≡𝑏 (mod 𝑚) if 𝑚 divides the difference 𝑎 − 𝑏", or Wikipedia "Modular arithmetic - Congruence", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_arithmetic#Congruence, 11-Jul-2021,: "Given an integer n > 1, called a modulus, two integers are said to be congruent modulo n, if n is a divisor of their difference (i.e., if there is an integer k such that a-b = kn)". (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 mod 𝑀) = (𝐵 mod 𝑀) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑛 · 𝑀) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | divgcdcoprm0 12631 | Integers divided by gcd are coprime. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → ((𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) gcd (𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | divgcdcoprmex 12632* | Integers divided by gcd are coprime (see ProofWiki "Integers Divided by GCD are Coprime", 11-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_Divided_by_GCD_are_Coprime): Any pair of integers, not both zero, can be reduced to a pair of coprime ones by dividing them by their gcd. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝑀 = (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 = (𝑀 · 𝑎) ∧ 𝐵 = (𝑀 · 𝑏) ∧ (𝑎 gcd 𝑏) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | cncongr1 12633 | One direction of the bicondition in cncongr 12635. Theorem 5.4 in [ApostolNT] p. 109. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 = (𝑁 / (𝐶 gcd 𝑁)))) → (((𝐴 · 𝐶) mod 𝑁) = ((𝐵 · 𝐶) mod 𝑁) → (𝐴 mod 𝑀) = (𝐵 mod 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | cncongr2 12634 | The other direction of the bicondition in cncongr 12635. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 = (𝑁 / (𝐶 gcd 𝑁)))) → ((𝐴 mod 𝑀) = (𝐵 mod 𝑀) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) mod 𝑁) = ((𝐵 · 𝐶) mod 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | cncongr 12635 | Cancellability of Congruences (see ProofWiki "Cancellability of Congruences, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellability_of_Congruences, 10-Jul-2021): Two products with a common factor are congruent modulo a positive integer iff the other factors are congruent modulo the integer divided by the greates common divisor of the integer and the common factor. See also Theorem 5.4 "Cancellation law" in [ApostolNT] p. 109. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 = (𝑁 / (𝐶 gcd 𝑁)))) → (((𝐴 · 𝐶) mod 𝑁) = ((𝐵 · 𝐶) mod 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 mod 𝑀) = (𝐵 mod 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | cncongrcoprm 12636 | Corollary 1 of Cancellability of Congruences: Two products with a common factor are congruent modulo an integer being coprime to the common factor iff the other factors are congruent modulo the integer. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐶 gcd 𝑁) = 1)) → (((𝐴 · 𝐶) mod 𝑁) = ((𝐵 · 𝐶) mod 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 mod 𝑁) = (𝐵 mod 𝑁))) | ||
Remark: to represent odd prime numbers, i.e., all prime numbers except 2, the idiom 𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) is used. It is a little bit shorter than (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 2). Both representations can be converted into each other by eldifsn 3795. | ||
| Syntax | cprime 12637 | Extend the definition of a class to include the set of prime numbers. |
| class ℙ | ||
| Definition | df-prm 12638* | Define the set of prime numbers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ℙ = {𝑝 ∈ ℕ ∣ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑝} ≈ 2o} | ||
| Theorem | isprm 12639* | The predicate "is a prime number". A prime number is a positive integer with exactly two positive divisors. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑃 ∈ ℕ ∧ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑃} ≈ 2o)) | ||
| Theorem | prmnn 12640 | A prime number is a positive integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | prmz 12641 | A prime number is an integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Jonathan Yan, 16-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | prmssnn 12642 | The prime numbers are a subset of the positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ℙ ⊆ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | prmex 12643 | The set of prime numbers exists. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ℙ ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | 1nprm 12644 | 1 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 3-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 1 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | 1idssfct 12645* | The positive divisors of a positive integer include 1 and itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → {1, 𝑁} ⊆ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑁}) | ||
| Theorem | isprm2lem 12646* | Lemma for isprm2 12647. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 1) → ({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑃} ≈ 2o ↔ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑛 ∥ 𝑃} = {1, 𝑃})) | ||
| Theorem | isprm2 12647* | The predicate "is a prime number". A prime number is an integer greater than or equal to 2 whose only positive divisors are 1 and itself. Definition in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑃 → (𝑧 = 1 ∨ 𝑧 = 𝑃)))) | ||
| Theorem | isprm3 12648* | The predicate "is a prime number". A prime number is an integer greater than or equal to 2 with no divisors strictly between 1 and itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (2...(𝑃 − 1)) ¬ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | isprm4 12649* | The predicate "is a prime number". A prime number is an integer greater than or equal to 2 whose only divisor greater than or equal to 2 is itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)(𝑧 ∥ 𝑃 → 𝑧 = 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | prmind2 12650* | A variation on prmind 12651 assuming complete induction for primes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 · 𝑧) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℙ ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (1...(𝑥 − 1))𝜒) → 𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | prmind 12651* | Perform induction over the multiplicative structure of ℕ. If a property 𝜑(𝑥) holds for the primes and 1 and is preserved under multiplication, then it holds for every positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 · 𝑧) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℙ → 𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsprime 12652 | If 𝑀 divides a prime, then 𝑀 is either the prime or one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑃 ↔ (𝑀 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑀 = 1))) | ||
| Theorem | nprm 12653 | A product of two integers greater than one is composite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → ¬ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℙ) | ||
| Theorem | nprmi 12654 | An inference for compositeness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 1 < 𝐴 & ⊢ 1 < 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝑁 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | dvdsnprmd 12655 | If a number is divisible by an integer greater than 1 and less then the number, the number is not prime. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ) | ||
| Theorem | prm2orodd 12656 | A prime number is either 2 or odd. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → (𝑃 = 2 ∨ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | 2prm 12657 | 2 is a prime number. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 16-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ 2 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | 3prm 12658 | 3 is a prime number. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 3 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | 4nprm 12659 | 4 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 4 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | prmdc 12660 | Primality is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → DECID 𝑁 ∈ ℙ) | ||
| Theorem | prmuz2 12661 | A prime number is an integer greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → 𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) | ||
| Theorem | prmgt1 12662 | A prime number is an integer greater than 1. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → 1 < 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | prmm2nn0 12663 | Subtracting 2 from a prime number results in a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → (𝑃 − 2) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | oddprmgt2 12664 | An odd prime is greater than 2. (Contributed by AV, 20-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) → 2 < 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | oddprmge3 12665 | An odd prime is greater than or equal to 3. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 20-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) → 𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) | ||
| Theorem | sqnprm 12666 | A square is never prime. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → ¬ (𝐴↑2) ∈ ℙ) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsprm 12667 | An integer greater than or equal to 2 divides a prime number iff it is equal to it. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑁 ∥ 𝑃 ↔ 𝑁 = 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | exprmfct 12668* | Every integer greater than or equal to 2 has a prime factor. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | prmdvdsfz 12669* | Each integer greater than 1 and less then or equal to a fixed number is divisible by a prime less then or equal to this fixed number. (Contributed by AV, 15-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (2...𝑁)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ≤ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | nprmdvds1 12670 | No prime number divides 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 1) | ||
| Theorem | isprm5lem 12671* | Lemma for isprm5 12672. The interesting direction (showing that one only needs to check prime divisors up to the square root of 𝑃). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℙ ((𝑧↑2) ≤ 𝑃 → ¬ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (2...(𝑃 − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∥ 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | isprm5 12672* | One need only check prime divisors of 𝑃 up to √𝑃 in order to ensure primality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℙ ((𝑧↑2) ≤ 𝑃 → ¬ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | divgcdodd 12673 | Either 𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) is odd or 𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) is odd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (¬ 2 ∥ (𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∨ ¬ 2 ∥ (𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)))) | ||
This section is about coprimality with respect to primes, and a special version of Euclid's lemma for primes is provided, see euclemma 12676. | ||
| Theorem | coprm 12674 | A prime number either divides an integer or is coprime to it, but not both. Theorem 1.8 in [ApostolNT] p. 17. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑃 gcd 𝑁) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | prmrp 12675 | Unequal prime numbers are relatively prime. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑃 gcd 𝑄) = 1 ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | euclemma 12676 | Euclid's lemma. A prime number divides the product of two integers iff it divides at least one of them. Theorem 1.9 in [ApostolNT] p. 17. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑃 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁) ↔ (𝑃 ∥ 𝑀 ∨ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | isprm6 12677* | A number is prime iff it satisfies Euclid's lemma euclemma 12676. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝑃 ∥ (𝑥 · 𝑦) → (𝑃 ∥ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | prmdvdsexp 12678 | A prime divides a positive power of an integer iff it divides the integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑃 ∥ (𝐴↑𝑁) ↔ 𝑃 ∥ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | prmdvdsexpb 12679 | A prime divides a positive power of another iff they are equal. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑃 ∥ (𝑄↑𝑁) ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | prmdvdsexpr 12680 | If a prime divides a nonnegative power of another, then they are equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑃 ∥ (𝑄↑𝑁) → 𝑃 = 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | prmexpb 12681 | Two positive prime powers are equal iff the primes and the powers are equal. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)) → ((𝑃↑𝑀) = (𝑄↑𝑁) ↔ (𝑃 = 𝑄 ∧ 𝑀 = 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | prmfac1 12682 | The factorial of a number only contains primes less than the base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ∥ (!‘𝑁)) → 𝑃 ≤ 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | rpexp 12683 | If two numbers 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then they are still relatively prime if raised to a power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd 𝐵) = 1 ↔ (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | rpexp1i 12684 | Relative primality passes to asymmetric powers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑀) gcd 𝐵) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | rpexp12i 12685 | Relative primality passes to symmetric powers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑀) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | prmndvdsfaclt 12686 | A prime number does not divide the factorial of a nonnegative integer less than the prime number. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 < 𝑃 → ¬ 𝑃 ∥ (!‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | cncongrprm 12687 | Corollary 2 of Cancellability of Congruences: Two products with a common factor are congruent modulo a prime number not dividing the common factor iff the other factors are congruent modulo the prime number. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝐶)) → (((𝐴 · 𝐶) mod 𝑃) = ((𝐵 · 𝐶) mod 𝑃) ↔ (𝐴 mod 𝑃) = (𝐵 mod 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | isevengcd2 12688 | The predicate "is an even number". An even number and 2 have 2 as greatest common divisor. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by AV, 8-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ ℤ → (2 ∥ 𝑍 ↔ (2 gcd 𝑍) = 2)) | ||
| Theorem | isoddgcd1 12689 | The predicate "is an odd number". An odd number and 2 have 1 as greatest common divisor. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by AV, 8-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ ℤ → (¬ 2 ∥ 𝑍 ↔ (2 gcd 𝑍) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | 3lcm2e6 12690 | The least common multiple of three and two is six. The operands are unequal primes and thus coprime, so the result is (the absolute value of) their product. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (3 lcm 2) = 6 | ||
| Theorem | sqrt2irrlem 12691 | Lemma for sqrt2irr 12692. This is the core of the proof: - if 𝐴 / 𝐵 = √(2), then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are even, so 𝐴 / 2 and 𝐵 / 2 are smaller representatives, which is absurd by the method of infinite descent (here implemented by strong induction). (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘2) = (𝐴 / 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 2) ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐵 / 2) ∈ ℕ)) | ||
| Theorem | sqrt2irr 12692 |
The square root of 2 is not rational. That is, for any rational number,
(√‘2) does not equal it. However,
if we were to say "the
square root of 2 is irrational" that would mean something stronger:
"for any rational number, (√‘2)
is apart from it" (the two
statements are equivalent given excluded middle). See sqrt2irrap 12710 for
the proof that the square root of two is irrational.
The proof's core is proven in sqrt2irrlem 12691, which shows that if 𝐴 / 𝐵 = √(2), then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are even, so 𝐴 / 2 and 𝐵 / 2 are smaller representatives, which is absurd. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (√‘2) ∉ ℚ | ||
| Theorem | sqrt2re 12693 | The square root of 2 exists and is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2004.) |
| ⊢ (√‘2) ∈ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | sqrt2irr0 12694 | The square root of 2 is not rational. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.) |
| ⊢ (√‘2) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) | ||
| Theorem | pw2dvdslemn 12695* | Lemma for pw2dvds 12696. If a natural number has some power of two which does not divide it, there is a highest power of two which does divide it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (2↑𝐴) ∥ 𝑁) → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ((2↑𝑚) ∥ 𝑁 ∧ ¬ (2↑(𝑚 + 1)) ∥ 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | pw2dvds 12696* | A natural number has a highest power of two which divides it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ((2↑𝑚) ∥ 𝑁 ∧ ¬ (2↑(𝑚 + 1)) ∥ 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | pw2dvdseulemle 12697 | Lemma for pw2dvdseu 12698. Powers of two which do and do not divide a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2↑𝐴) ∥ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (2↑(𝐵 + 1)) ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pw2dvdseu 12698* | A natural number has a unique highest power of two which divides it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃!𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ((2↑𝑚) ∥ 𝑁 ∧ ¬ (2↑(𝑚 + 1)) ∥ 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | oddpwdclemxy 12699* | Lemma for oddpwdc 12704. Another way of stating that decomposing a natural number into a power of two and an odd number is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝑋 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝐴 = ((2↑𝑌) · 𝑋)) → (𝑋 = (𝐴 / (2↑(℩𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ((2↑𝑧) ∥ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (2↑(𝑧 + 1)) ∥ 𝐴)))) ∧ 𝑌 = (℩𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ((2↑𝑧) ∥ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (2↑(𝑧 + 1)) ∥ 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | oddpwdclemdvds 12700* | Lemma for oddpwdc 12704. A natural number is divisible by the highest power of two which divides it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (2↑(℩𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ((2↑𝑧) ∥ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (2↑(𝑧 + 1)) ∥ 𝐴))) ∥ 𝐴) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |