| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 134 of 172) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemom 13301* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. 𝐻 yields finite sequences. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐻‘𝑃) ∈ ω) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemhdmp1 13302* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. Domain at a successor where we need to add an element to the sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐹‘(◡𝑁‘𝑃)) ∈ (𝐹 “ (◡𝑁‘𝑃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐻‘(𝑃 + 1)) = suc dom (𝐻‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemss 13303* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. We only add elements to 𝐻 as the index increases. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑃) ⊆ (𝐻‘(𝑃 + 1))) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfoneleminc 13304* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. We only add elements to 𝐻 as the index increases. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≤ 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑃) ⊆ (𝐻‘𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemkh 13305* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. Because we add zero or one entries for each new index, the length of each sequence is no greater than its index. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐻‘𝑃) ⊆ (◡𝑁‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemhf1o 13306* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. Each of the functions in 𝐻 is one to one and onto an image of 𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑃):dom (𝐻‘𝑃)–1-1-onto→(𝐹 “ (◡𝑁‘𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemex 13307* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. Extending the sequence (𝐻‘𝑃) to include an additional element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 dom (𝐻‘𝑃) ∈ dom (𝐻‘𝑖)) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemhom 13308* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. The sequences in 𝐻 increase in length without bound if you go out far enough. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 𝑀 ∈ dom (𝐻‘𝑖)) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemrnh 13309* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. A consequence of ennnfonelemss 13303. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ran 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ran 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 ∨ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemfun 13310* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. 𝐿 is a function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐿) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemf1 13311* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. 𝐿 is one-to-one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:dom 𝐿–1-1→𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemrn 13312* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. 𝐿 is onto 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐿 = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemdm 13313* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. The function 𝐿 is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐿 = ω) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemen 13314* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {〈dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)〉}))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1)))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemnn0 13315* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. A version of ennnfonelemen 13314 expressed in terms of ℕ0 instead of ω. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑛)(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemr 13316* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. The interesting direction, expressed in deduction form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑛)(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfonelemim 13317* | Lemma for ennnfone 13318. The trivial direction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ℕ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:ℕ0–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑛)(𝑓‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑓‘𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | ennnfone 13318* | A condition for a set being countably infinite. Corollary 8.1.13 of [AczelRathjen], p. 73. Roughly speaking, the condition says that 𝐴 is countable (that's the 𝑓:ℕ0–onto→𝐴 part, as seen in theorems like ctm 7449), infinite (that's the part about being able to find an element of 𝐴 distinct from any mapping of a natural number via 𝑓), and has decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ℕ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:ℕ0–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑛)(𝑓‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑓‘𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | exmidunben 13319* | If any unbounded set of positive integers is equinumerous to ℕ, then the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO) implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑥 𝑚 < 𝑛) → 𝑥 ≈ ℕ) ∧ ω ∈ Omni) → EXMID) | ||
| Theorem | ctinfomlemom 13320* | Lemma for ctinfom 13321. Converting between ω and ℕ0. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ ◡𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ¬ (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑛)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺:ℕ0–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐺‘𝑗) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑖))) | ||
| Theorem | ctinfom 13321* | A condition for a set being countably infinite. Restates ennnfone 13318 in terms of ω and function image. Like ennnfone 13318 the condition can be summarized as 𝐴 being countable, infinite, and having decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ℕ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:ω–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ¬ (𝑓‘𝑘) ∈ (𝑓 “ 𝑛)))) | ||
| Theorem | inffinp1 13322* | An infinite set contains an element not contained in a given finite subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ≼ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ctinf 13323* | A set is countably infinite if and only if it has decidable equality, is countable, and is infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ℕ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→𝐴 ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | qnnen 13324 | The rational numbers are countably infinite. Corollary 8.1.23 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. This is Metamath 100 proof #3. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℚ ≈ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | enctlem 13325* | Lemma for enct 13326. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))) | ||
| Theorem | enct 13326* | Countability is invariant relative to equinumerosity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ↔ ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))) | ||
| Theorem | ctiunctlemu1st 13327* | Lemma for ctiunct 13333. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑁)) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ctiunctlemu2nd 13328* | Lemma for ctiunct 13333. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑁)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑁))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | ctiunctlemuom 13329 | Lemma for ctiunct 13333. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ω) | ||
| Theorem | ctiunctlemudc 13330* | Lemma for ctiunct 13333. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | ctiunctlemf 13331* | Lemma for ctiunct 13333. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)} & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))) / 𝑥⦌𝐺‘(2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑛)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑈⟶∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ctiunctlemfo 13332* | Lemma for ctiunct 13333. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)} & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))) / 𝑥⦌𝐺‘(2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑛)))) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐻 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑈 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑈–onto→∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ctiunct 13333* |
A sequence of enumerations gives an enumeration of the union. We refer
to "sequence of enumerations" rather than "countably many
countable
sets" because the hypothesis provides more than countability for
each
𝐵(𝑥): it refers to 𝐵(𝑥) together with the 𝐺(𝑥)
which enumerates it. Theorem 8.1.19 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74.
For "countably many countable sets" the key hypothesis would be (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑔𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o). This is almost omiunct 13337 (which uses countable choice) although that is for a countably infinite collection not any countable collection. Compare with the case of two sets instead of countably many, as seen at unct 13335, which says that the union of two countable sets is countable . The proof proceeds by mapping a natural number to a pair of natural numbers (by xpomen 13288) and using the first number to map to an element 𝑥 of 𝐴 and the second number to map to an element of B(x) . In this way we are able to map to every element of ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵. Although it would be possible to work directly with countability expressed as 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o), we instead use functions from subsets of the natural numbers via ctssdccl 7451 and ctssdc 7453. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→(∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) | ||
| Theorem | ctiunctal 13334* | Variation of ctiunct 13333 which allows 𝑥 to be present in 𝜑. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐺:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→(∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) | ||
| Theorem | unct 13335* | The union of two countable sets is countable. Corollary 8.1.20 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ∧ ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊔ 1o)) | ||
| Theorem | omctfn 13336* | Using countable choice to find a sequence of enumerations for a collection of countable sets. Lemma 8.1.27 of [AczelRathjen], p. 77. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ω) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑥):ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))) | ||
| Theorem | omiunct 13337* | The union of a countably infinite collection of countable sets is countable. Theorem 8.1.28 of [AczelRathjen], p. 78. Compare with ctiunct 13333 which has a stronger hypothesis but does not require countable choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ω) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→(∪ 𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) | ||
| Theorem | ssomct 13338* | A decidable subset of ω is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o)) | ||
| Theorem | ssnnctlemct 13339* | Lemma for ssnnct 13340. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o)) | ||
| Theorem | ssnnct 13340* | A decidable subset of ℕ is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o)) | ||
| Theorem | nninfdclemcl 13341* | Lemma for nninfdc 13346. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃(𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < ))𝑄) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nninfdclemf 13342* | Lemma for nninfdc 13346. A function from the natural numbers into 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nninfdclemp1 13343* | Lemma for nninfdc 13346. Each element of the sequence 𝐹 is greater than the previous element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑈) < (𝐹‘(𝑈 + 1))) | ||
| Theorem | nninfdclemlt 13344* | Lemma for nninfdc 13346. The function from nninfdclemf 13342 is strictly monotonic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 < 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑈) < (𝐹‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | nninfdclemf1 13345* | Lemma for nninfdc 13346. The function from nninfdclemf 13342 is one-to-one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ–1-1→𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nninfdc 13346* | An unbounded decidable set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → ω ≼ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | unbendc 13347* | An unbounded decidable set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | prminf 13348 | There are an infinite number of primes. Theorem 1.7 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ ℙ ≈ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | infpn2 13349* | There exist infinitely many prime numbers: the set of all primes 𝑆 is unbounded by infpn 13142, so by unbendc 13347 it is infinite. This is Metamath 100 proof #11. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (1 < 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑛 / 𝑚) ∈ ℕ → (𝑚 = 1 ∨ 𝑚 = 𝑛)))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 ≈ ℕ | ||
An "extensible structure" (or "structure" in short, at least in this section) is used to define a specific group, ring, poset, and so on. An extensible structure can contain many components. For example, a group will have at least two components (base set and operation), although it can be further specialized by adding other components such as a multiplicative operation for rings (and still remain a group per our definition). Thus, every ring is also a group. This extensible structure approach allows theorems from more general structures (such as groups) to be reused for more specialized structures (such as rings) without having to reprove anything. Structures are common in mathematics, but in informal (natural language) proofs the details are assumed in ways that we must make explicit. An extensible structure is implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs) on a finite (and not necessarily sequential) subset of ℕ. The function's argument is the index of a structure component (such as 1 for the base set of a group), and its value is the component (such as the base set). By convention, we normally avoid direct reference to the hard-coded numeric index and instead use structure component extractors such as ndxid 13378 and strslfv 13399. Using extractors makes it easier to change numeric indices and also makes the components' purpose clearer. See the comment of basendx 13409 for more details on numeric indices versus the structure component extractors. There are many other possible ways to handle structures. We chose this extensible structure approach because this approach (1) results in simpler notation than other approaches we are aware of, and (2) is easier to do proofs with. We cannot use an approach that uses "hidden" arguments; Metamath does not support hidden arguments, and in any case we want nothing hidden. It would be possible to use a categorical approach (e.g., something vaguely similar to Lean's mathlib). However, instances (the chain of proofs that an 𝑋 is a 𝑌 via a bunch of forgetful functors) can cause serious performance problems for automated tooling, and the resulting proofs would be painful to look at directly (in the case of Lean, they are long past the level where people would find it acceptable to look at them directly). Metamath is working under much stricter conditions than this, and it has still managed to achieve about the same level of flexibility through this "extensible structure" approach. To create a substructure of a given extensible structure, you can simply use the multifunction restriction operator for extensible structures ↾s as defined in df-iress 13362. This can be used to turn statements about rings into statements about subrings, modules into submodules, etc. This definition knows nothing about individual structures and merely truncates the Base set while leaving operators alone. Individual kinds of structures will need to handle this behavior by ignoring operators' values outside the range, defining a function using the base set and applying that, or explicitly truncating the slot before use. Extensible structures only work well when they represent concrete categories, where there is a "base set", morphisms are functions, and subobjects are subsets with induced operations. In short, they primarily work well for "sets with (some) extra structure". Extensible structures may not suffice for more complicated situations. For example, in manifolds, ↾s would not work. That said, extensible structures are sufficient for many of the structures that set.mm currently considers, and offer a good compromise for a goal-oriented formalization. | ||
| Syntax | cstr 13350 | Extend class notation with the class of structures with components numbered below 𝐴. |
| class Struct | ||
| Syntax | cnx 13351 | Extend class notation with the structure component index extractor. |
| class ndx | ||
| Syntax | csts 13352 | Set components of a structure. |
| class sSet | ||
| Syntax | cslot 13353 | Extend class notation with the slot function. |
| class Slot 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | cbs 13354 | Extend class notation with the class of all base set extractors. |
| class Base | ||
| Syntax | cress 13355 | Extend class notation with the extensible structure builder restriction operator. |
| class ↾s | ||
| Definition | df-struct 13356* |
Define a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. This is not a
requirement for groups, posets, etc., but it is a useful assumption for
component extraction theorems.
As mentioned in the section header, an "extensible structure should be implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs)". The current definition, however, is less restrictive: it allows for classes which contain the empty set ∅ to be extensible structures. Because of 0nelfun 5395, such classes cannot be functions. Without the empty set, however, a structure must be a function, see structn0fun 13367: 𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}). Allowing an extensible structure to contain the empty set ensures that expressions like {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉} are structures without asserting or implying that 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶 and 𝐷 are sets (if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is a proper class, then 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = ∅, see opprc 3925). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ Struct = {〈𝑓, 𝑥〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝑓 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝑓 ⊆ (...‘𝑥))} | ||
| Definition | df-ndx 13357 | Define the structure component index extractor. See Theorem ndxarg 13377 to understand its purpose. The restriction to ℕ ensures that ndx is a set. The restriction to some set is necessary since I is a proper class. In principle, we could have chosen ℂ or (if we revise all structure component definitions such as df-base 13360) another set such as the set of finite ordinals ω (df-iom 4738). (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ndx = ( I ↾ ℕ) | ||
| Definition | df-slot 13358* |
Define the slot extractor for extensible structures. The class
Slot 𝐴 is a function whose argument can be
any set, although it is
meaningful only if that set is a member of an extensible structure (such
as a partially ordered set or a group).
Note that Slot 𝐴 is implemented as "evaluation at 𝐴". That is, (Slot 𝐴‘𝑆) is defined to be (𝑆‘𝐴), where 𝐴 will typically be a small nonzero natural number. Each extensible structure 𝑆 is a function defined on specific natural number "slots", and this function extracts the value at a particular slot. The special "structure" ndx, defined as the identity function restricted to ℕ, can be used to extract the number 𝐴 from a slot, since (Slot 𝐴‘ndx) = 𝐴 (see ndxarg 13377). This is typically used to refer to the number of a slot when defining structures without having to expose the detail of what that number is (for instance, we use the expression (Base‘ndx) in theorems and proofs instead of its value 1). The class Slot cannot be defined as (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓‘𝑥))) because each Slot 𝐴 is a function on the proper class V so is itself a proper class, and the values of functions are sets (fvex 5715). It is necessary to allow proper classes as values of Slot 𝐴 since for instance the class of all (base sets of) groups is proper. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Slot 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | sloteq 13359 | Equality theorem for the Slot construction. The converse holds if 𝐴 (or 𝐵) is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Slot 𝐴 = Slot 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-base 13360 | Define the base set (also called underlying set, ground set, carrier set, or carrier) extractor for extensible structures. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ Base = Slot 1 | ||
| Definition | df-sets 13361* | Set a component of an extensible structure. This function is useful for taking an existing structure and "overriding" one of its components. For example, df-iress 13362 adjusts the base set to match its second argument, which has the effect of making subgroups, subspaces, subrings etc. from the original structures. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ sSet = (𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑠 ↾ (V ∖ dom {𝑒})) ∪ {𝑒})) | ||
| Definition | df-iress 13362* |
Define a multifunction restriction operator for extensible structures,
which can be used to turn statements about rings into statements about
subrings, modules into submodules, etc. This definition knows nothing
about individual structures and merely truncates the Base set while
leaving operators alone; individual kinds of structures will need to
handle this behavior, by ignoring operators' values outside the range,
defining a function using the base set and applying that, or explicitly
truncating the slot before use.
(Credit for this operator, as well as the 2023 modification for iset.mm, goes to Mario Carneiro.) (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ↾s = (𝑤 ∈ V, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 sSet 〈(Base‘ndx), (𝑥 ∩ (Base‘𝑤))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | brstruct 13363 | The structure relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel Struct | ||
| Theorem | isstruct2im 13364 | The property of being a structure with components in (1st ‘𝑋)...(2nd ‘𝑋). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → (𝑋 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (...‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | isstruct2r 13365 | The property of being a structure with components in (1st ‘𝑋)...(2nd ‘𝑋). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅})) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (...‘𝑋))) → 𝐹 Struct 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | structex 13366 | A structure is a set. (Contributed by AV, 10-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 Struct 𝑋 → 𝐺 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | structn0fun 13367 | A structure without the empty set is a function. (Contributed by AV, 13-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅})) | ||
| Theorem | isstructim 13368 | The property of being a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Struct 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉 → ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | isstructr 13369 | The property of being a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ∧ (Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁))) → 𝐹 Struct 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉) | ||
| Theorem | structcnvcnv 13370 | Two ways to express the relational part of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → ◡◡𝐹 = (𝐹 ∖ {∅})) | ||
| Theorem | structfung 13371 | The converse of the converse of a structure is a function. Closed form of structfun 13372. (Contributed by AV, 12-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun ◡◡𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | structfun 13372 | Convert between two kinds of structure closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 Struct 𝑋 ⇒ ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | structfn 13373 | Convert between two kinds of structure closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 Struct 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (1...𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | strnfvnd 13374 | Deduction version of strnfvn 13375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝑆‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | strnfvn 13375 |
Value of a structure component extractor 𝐸. Normally, 𝐸 is a
defined constant symbol such as Base (df-base 13360) and 𝑁 is a
fixed integer such as 1. 𝑆 is a structure, i.e. a
specific
member of a class of structures.
Note: Normally, this theorem shouldn't be used outside of this section, because it requires hard-coded index values. Instead, use strslfv 13399. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝑆‘𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | strfvssn 13376 | A structure component extractor produces a value which is contained in a set dependent on 𝑆, but not 𝐸. This is sometimes useful for showing sethood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑆) ⊆ ∪ ran 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | ndxarg 13377 | Get the numeric argument from a defined structure component extractor such as df-base 13360. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) = 𝑁 | ||
| Theorem | ndxid 13378 |
A structure component extractor is defined by its own index. This
theorem, together with strslfv 13399 below, is useful for avoiding direct
reference to the hard-coded numeric index in component extractor
definitions, such as the 1 in df-base 13360, making it easier to change
should the need arise.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) | ||
| Theorem | ndxslid 13379 | A structure component extractor is defined by its own index. That the index is a natural number will also be needed in quite a few contexts so it is included in the conclusion of this theorem which can be used as a hypothesis of theorems like strslfv 13399. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | slotslfn 13380 | A slot is a function on sets, treated as structures. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐸 Fn V | ||
| Theorem | slotex 13381 | Existence of slot value. A corollary of slotslfn 13380. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐸‘𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | strndxid 13382 | The value of a structure component extractor is the value of the corresponding slot of the structure. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘(𝐸‘ndx)) = (𝐸‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | reldmsets 13383 | The structure override operator is a proper operator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom sSet | ||
| Theorem | setsvalg 13384 | Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet 𝐴) = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ dom {𝐴})) ∪ {𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | setsvala 13385 | Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉})) | ||
| Theorem | setsex 13386 | Applying the structure replacement function yields a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | strsetsid 13387 | Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Struct 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ dom 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (𝑆 sSet 〈(𝐸‘ndx), (𝐸‘𝑆)〉)) | ||
| Theorem | fvsetsid 13388 | The value of the structure replacement function for its first argument is its second argument. (Contributed by SO, 12-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) → ((𝐹 sSet 〈𝑋, 𝑌〉)‘𝑋) = 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | setsfun 13389 | A structure with replacement is a function if the original structure is a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → Fun (𝐺 sSet 〈𝐼, 𝐸〉)) | ||
| Theorem | setsfun0 13390 | A structure with replacement without the empty set is a function if the original structure without the empty set is a function. This variant of setsfun 13389 is useful for proofs based on isstruct2r 13365 which requires Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) for 𝐹 to be an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun (𝐺 ∖ {∅})) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → Fun ((𝐺 sSet 〈𝐼, 𝐸〉) ∖ {∅})) | ||
| Theorem | setsn0fun 13391 | The value of the structure replacement function (without the empty set) is a function if the structure (without the empty set) is a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.) (Revised by AV, 16-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Struct 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ((𝑆 sSet 〈𝐼, 𝐸〉) ∖ {∅})) | ||
| Theorem | setsresg 13392 | The structure replacement function does not affect the value of 𝑆 away from 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝑆 sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})) = (𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴}))) | ||
| Theorem | setsabsd 13393 | Replacing the same components twice yields the same as the second setting only. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) = (𝑆 sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | setscom 13394 | Different components can be set in any order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝑆 sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) sSet 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) = ((𝑆 sSet 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | setscomd 13395 | Different components can be set in any order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) sSet 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) = ((𝑆 sSet 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) sSet 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
| Theorem | strslfvd 13396 | Deduction version of strslfv 13399. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | strslfv2d 13397 | Deduction version of strslfv 13399. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ◡◡𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | strslfv2 13398 | A variation on strslfv 13399 to avoid asserting that 𝑆 itself is a function, which involves sethood of all the ordered pair components of 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V & ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆 & ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 〈(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | strslfv 13399 | Extract a structure component 𝐶 (such as the base set) from a structure 𝑆 with a component extractor 𝐸 (such as the base set extractor df-base 13360). By virtue of ndxslid 13379, this can be done without having to refer to the hard-coded numeric index of 𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 Struct 𝑋 & ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ {〈(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶〉} ⊆ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | strslfv3 13400 | Variant on strslfv 13399 for large structures. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Struct 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶〉} ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |