Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8401-8500 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | ltnrd 8401 |
'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | gtned 8402 |
'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapd 8929 which is the same but
for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ltned 8403 |
'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | lttri3d 8404 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | letri3d 8405 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | letrid 8406 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Matthew House,
28-Jun-2026.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | eqleltd 8407 |
Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed
by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | lenltd 8408 |
'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | ltled 8409 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ltnsymd 8410 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | nltled 8411 |
'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | lensymd 8412 |
'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | mulgt0d 8413 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | letrd 8414 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
NM, 20-May-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | lelttrd 8415 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'.
(Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | lttrd 8416 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM,
9-Jan-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | 0lt1 8417 |
0 is less than 1. Theorem I.21 of [Apostol] p.
20. Part of definition
11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies).
(Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|
| ⊢ 0 < 1 |
| |
| Theorem | ltntri 8418 |
Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we
cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does
that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that
is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no,
as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being
unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
| |
| 4.2.5 Initial properties of the complex
numbers
|
| |
| Theorem | mul12 8419 |
Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM,
30-Apr-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | mul32 8420 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | mul31 8421 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | mul4 8422 |
Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) |
| |
| Theorem | muladd11 8423 |
A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵)))) |
| |
| Theorem | 1p1times 8424 |
Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) ·
𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | peano2cn 8425 |
A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate
peano2 4722. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ) |
| |
| Theorem | peano2re 8426 |
A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4722.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ) |
| |
| Theorem | addcom 8427 |
Addition commutes. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | addrid 8428 |
0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon,
16-Jan-2020.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | addlid 8429 |
0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by
Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | readdcan 8430 |
Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott
Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐴) = (𝐶 + 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | 00id 8431 |
0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott
Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (0 + 0) = 0 |
| |
| Theorem | addridi 8432 |
0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by NM,
23-Nov-1994.)
(Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | addlidi 8433 |
0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by NM,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
⇒ ⊢ (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | addcomi 8434 |
Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by
Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | addcomli 8435 |
Addition commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | mul12i 8436 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple
product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew
Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | mul32i 8437 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple
product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | mul4i 8438 |
Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | addridd 8439 |
0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | addlidd 8440 |
0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | addcomd 8441 |
Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by
Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | mul12d 8442 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple
product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | mul32d 8443 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple
product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | mul31d 8444 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | mul4d 8445 |
Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) |
| |
| Theorem | muladd11r 8446 |
A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 1) · (𝐵 + 1)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 + 𝐵)) + 1)) |
| |
| Theorem | comraddd 8447 |
Commute RHS addition, in deduction form. (Contributed by David A.
Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵)) |
| |
| 4.3 Real and complex numbers - basic
operations
|
| |
| 4.3.1 Addition
|
| |
| Theorem | add12 8448 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | add32 8449 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | add32r 8450 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum,
rearranging the parentheses. (Contributed by Paul Chapman,
18-May-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | add4 8451 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))) |
| |
| Theorem | add42 8452 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | add12i 8453 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | add32i 8454 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | add4i 8455 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | add42i 8456 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | add12d 8457 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | add32d 8458 |
Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple
sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | add4d 8459 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))) |
| |
| Theorem | add42d 8460 |
Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))) |
| |
| 4.3.2 Subtraction
|
| |
| Syntax | cmin 8461 |
Extend class notation to include subtraction.
|
| class − |
| |
| Syntax | cneg 8462 |
Extend class notation to include unary minus. The symbol - is not a
class by itself but part of a compound class definition. We do this
rather than making it a formal function since it is so commonly used.
Note: We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction
cmin 8461 (−) to prevent
syntax ambiguity. For example, looking at the
syntax definition co 6058, if we used the same symbol
then "( − 𝐴 − 𝐵) " could mean either
"− 𝐴 " minus "𝐵",
or
it could represent the (meaningless) operation of
classes "− " and "− 𝐵
" connected with "operation" "𝐴".
On the other hand, "(-𝐴 − 𝐵) " is unambiguous.
|
| class -𝐴 |
| |
| Definition | df-sub 8463* |
Define subtraction. Theorem subval 8482 shows its value (and describes how
this definition works), Theorem subaddi 8577 relates it to addition, and
Theorems subcli 8566 and resubcli 8553 prove its closure laws. (Contributed
by NM, 26-Nov-1994.)
|
| ⊢ − = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝑦 + 𝑧) = 𝑥)) |
| |
| Definition | df-neg 8464 |
Define the negative of a number (unary minus). We use different symbols
for unary minus (-) and subtraction (−) to prevent syntax
ambiguity. See cneg 8462 for a discussion of this. (Contributed by
NM,
10-Feb-1995.)
|
| ⊢ -𝐴 = (0 − 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | cnegexlem1 8465 |
Addition cancellation of a real number from two complex numbers. Lemma
for cnegex 8468. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | cnegexlem2 8466 |
Existence of a real number which produces a real number when multiplied
by i. (Hint: zero is such a number, although we
don't need to
prove that yet). Lemma for cnegex 8468. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt,
22-May-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ (i · 𝑦) ∈
ℝ |
| |
| Theorem | cnegexlem3 8467* |
Existence of real number difference. Lemma for cnegex 8468. (Contributed
by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ (𝑏 + 𝑐) = 𝑦) |
| |
| Theorem | cnegex 8468* |
Existence of the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by Eric
Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) |
| |
| Theorem | cnegex2 8469* |
Existence of a left inverse for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝐴) = 0) |
| |
| Theorem | addcan 8470 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | addcan2 8471 |
Cancellation law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.)
(Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | addcani 8472 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | addcan2i 8473 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by NM, 14-May-2003.) (Revised by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | addcand 8474 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | addcan2d 8475 |
Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | addcanad 8476 |
Cancelling a term on the left-hand side of a sum in an equality.
Consequence of addcand 8474. (Contributed by David Moews,
28-Feb-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | addcan2ad 8477 |
Cancelling a term on the right-hand side of a sum in an equality.
Consequence of addcan2d 8475. (Contributed by David Moews,
28-Feb-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | addneintrd 8478 |
Introducing a term on the left-hand side of a sum in a negated
equality. Contrapositive of addcanad 8476. Consequence of addcand 8474.
(Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ≠ (𝐴 + 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | addneintr2d 8479 |
Introducing a term on the right-hand side of a sum in a negated
equality. Contrapositive of addcan2ad 8477. Consequence of
addcan2d 8475. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) ≠ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | 0cnALT 8480 |
Alternate proof of 0cn 8282. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised
by
Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ |
| |
| Theorem | negeu 8481* |
Existential uniqueness of negatives. Theorem I.2 of [Apostol] p. 18.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | subval 8482* |
Value of subtraction, which is the (unique) element 𝑥 such that
𝐵 +
𝑥 = 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.)
(Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 2-Nov-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐵 + 𝑥) = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | negeq 8483 |
Equality theorem for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → -𝐴 = -𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | negeqi 8484 |
Equality inference for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ -𝐴 = -𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | negeqd 8485 |
Equality deduction for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 = -𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | nfnegd 8486 |
Deduction version of nfneg 8487. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥-𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | nfneg 8487 |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the negative of a complex number.
(Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
15-Oct-2016.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥-𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | csbnegg 8488 |
Move class substitution in and out of the negative of a number.
(Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
22-Oct-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌-𝐵 = -⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | subcl 8489 |
Closure law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1999.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) |
| |
| Theorem | negcl 8490 |
Closure law for negative. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → -𝐴 ∈ ℂ) |
| |
| Theorem | negicn 8491 |
-i is a complex number (common case). (Contributed by
David A.
Wheeler, 7-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ -i ∈ ℂ |
| |
| Theorem | subf 8492 |
Subtraction is an operation on the complex numbers. (Contributed by NM,
4-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.)
|
| ⊢ − :(ℂ ×
ℂ)⟶ℂ |
| |
| Theorem | subadd 8493 |
Relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by NM,
20-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | subadd2 8494 |
Relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott
Fenton, 5-Jul-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐵) = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | subsub23 8495 |
Swap subtrahend and result of subtraction. (Contributed by NM,
14-Dec-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | pncan 8496 |
Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐵) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | pncan2 8497 |
Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Apr-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐴) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | pncan3 8498 |
Subtraction and addition of equals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 − 𝐴)) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | npcan 8499 |
Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 𝐵) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | addsubass 8500 |
Associative-type law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM,
6-Aug-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 − 𝐶))) |