P. 68 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6701-6800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ercl2 6701	Elementhood in the field of an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	ersymb 6702	An equivalence relation is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	ertr 6703	An equivalence relation is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	ertrd 6704	A transitivity relation for equivalences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	ertr2d 6705	A transitivity relation for equivalences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	ertr3d 6706	A transitivity relation for equivalences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	ertr4d 6707	A transitivity relation for equivalences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	erref 6708	An equivalence relation is reflexive on its field. Compare Theorem 3M of [Enderton] p. 56. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	ercnv 6709	The converse of an equivalence relation is itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)
Theorem	errn 6710	The range and domain of an equivalence relation are equal. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 11-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ran 𝑅 = 𝐴)
Theorem	erssxp 6711	An equivalence relation is a subset of the cartesian product of the field. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	erex 6712	An equivalence relation is a set if its domain is a set. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 15-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑅 ∈ V))
Theorem	erexb 6713	An equivalence relation is a set if and only if its domain is a set. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 15-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V))
Theorem	iserd 6714*	A reflexive, symmetric, transitive relation is an equivalence relation on its domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)
Theorem	brdifun 6715	Evaluate the incomparability relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < ∪ ◡ < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	swoer 6716*	Incomparability under a strict weak partial order is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < ∪ ◡ < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑦 < 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 < 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)
Theorem	swoord1 6717*	The incomparability equivalence relation is compatible with the original order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < ∪ ◡ < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑦 < 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 < 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 < 𝐶))
Theorem	swoord2 6718*	The incomparability equivalence relation is compatible with the original order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < ∪ ◡ < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑦 < 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 < 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 < 𝐵))
Theorem	eqerlem 6719*	Lemma for eqer 6720. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧𝑅𝑤 ↔ ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = ⦋𝑤 / 𝑥⦌𝐴)
Theorem	eqer 6720*	Equivalence relation involving equality of dependent classes 𝐴(𝑥) and 𝐵(𝑦). (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 Er V
Theorem	ider 6721	The identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ I Er V
Theorem	0er 6722	The empty set is an equivalence relation on the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ∅ Er ∅
Theorem	eceq1 6723	Equality theorem for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐴]𝐶 = [𝐵]𝐶)
Theorem	eceq1d 6724	Equality theorem for equivalence class (deduction form). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝐶 = [𝐵]𝐶)
Theorem	eceq2 6725	Equality theorem for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐶]𝐴 = [𝐶]𝐵)
Theorem	eceq2i 6726	Equality theorem for the 𝐴-coset and 𝐵-coset of 𝐶, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐶]𝐴 = [𝐶]𝐵
Theorem	eceq2d 6727	Equality theorem for the 𝐴-coset and 𝐵-coset of 𝐶, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐶]𝐴 = [𝐶]𝐵)
Theorem	elecg 6728	Membership in an equivalence class. Theorem 72 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	elec 6729	Membership in an equivalence class. Theorem 72 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	relelec 6730	Membership in an equivalence class when 𝑅 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	ecss 6731	An equivalence class is a subset of the domain. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	ecdmn0m 6732*	A representative of an inhabited equivalence class belongs to the domain of the equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
Theorem	ereldm 6733	Equality of equivalence classes implies equivalence of domain membership. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋))
Theorem	erth 6734	Basic property of equivalence relations. Theorem 73 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
Theorem	erth2 6735	Basic property of equivalence relations. Compare Theorem 73 of [Suppes] p. 82. Assumes membership of the second argument in the domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
Theorem	erthi 6736	Basic property of equivalence relations. Part of Lemma 3N of [Enderton] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)
Theorem	ecidsn 6737	An equivalence class modulo the identity relation is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2004.)
⊢ [𝐴] I = {𝐴}
Theorem	qseq1 6738	Equality theorem for quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 / 𝐶) = (𝐵 / 𝐶))
Theorem	qseq2 6739	Equality theorem for quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 / 𝐴) = (𝐶 / 𝐵))
Theorem	elqsg 6740*	Closed form of elqs 6741. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 12-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = [𝑥]𝑅))
Theorem	elqs 6741*	Membership in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = [𝑥]𝑅)
Theorem	elqsi 6742*	Membership in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = [𝑥]𝑅)
Theorem	ecelqsg 6743	Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅))
Theorem	ecelqsi 6744	Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅))
Theorem	ecopqsi 6745	"Closure" law for equivalence class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1996.)
⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) / 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → [⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩]𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	qsexg 6746	A quotient set exists. (Contributed by FL, 19-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∈ V)
Theorem	qsex 6747	A quotient set exists. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∈ V
Theorem	uniqs 6748	The union of a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ (𝐴 / 𝑅) = (𝑅 “ 𝐴))
Theorem	qsss 6749	A quotient set is a set of subsets of the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 / 𝑅) ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	uniqs2 6750	The union of a quotient set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ (𝐴 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	snec 6751	The singleton of an equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {[𝐴]𝑅} = ({𝐴} / 𝑅)
Theorem	ecqs 6752	Equivalence class in terms of quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1999.)
⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐴]𝑅 = ∪ ({𝐴} / 𝑅)
Theorem	ecid 6753	A set is equal to its converse epsilon coset. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐴]◡ E = 𝐴
Theorem	ecidg 6754	A set is equal to its converse epsilon coset. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴]◡ E = 𝐴)
Theorem	qsid 6755	A set is equal to its quotient set mod converse epsilon. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 / ◡ E ) = 𝐴
Theorem	ectocld 6756*	Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐵 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([𝑥]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜓)
Theorem	ectocl 6757*	Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐵 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([𝑥]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → 𝜓)
Theorem	elqsn0m 6758*	An element of a quotient set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((dom 𝑅 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	elqsn0 6759	A quotient set doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((dom 𝑅 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	ecelqsdm 6760	Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ((dom 𝑅 = 𝐴 ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	xpider 6761	A square Cartesian product is an equivalence relation (in general it's not a poset). (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐴) Er 𝐴
Theorem	iinerm 6762*	The intersection of a nonempty family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅 Er 𝐵) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅 Er 𝐵)
Theorem	riinerm 6763*	The relative intersection of a family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅 Er 𝐵) → ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∩ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅) Er 𝐵)
Theorem	erinxp 6764	A restricted equivalence relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) Er 𝐵)
Theorem	ecinxp 6765	Restrict the relation in an equivalence class to a base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐵](𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
Theorem	qsinxp 6766	Restrict the equivalence relation in a quotient set to the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 / 𝑅) = (𝐴 / (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))))
Theorem	qsel 6767	If an element of a quotient set contains a given element, it is equal to the equivalence class of the element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = [𝐶]𝑅)
Theorem	qliftlem 6768*	𝐹, a function lift, is a subset of 𝑅 × 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → [𝑥]𝑅 ∈ (𝑋 / 𝑅))
Theorem	qliftrel 6769*	𝐹, a function lift, is a subset of 𝑅 × 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ ((𝑋 / 𝑅) × 𝑌))
Theorem	qliftel 6770*	Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐶]𝑅𝐹𝐷 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐶𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐴)))
Theorem	qliftel1 6771*	Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → [𝑥]𝑅𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	qliftfun 6772*	The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘[𝑥] = 𝐴, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	qliftfund 6773*	The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘[𝑥] = 𝐴, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
Theorem	qliftfuns 6774*	The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘[𝑥] = 𝐴, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐴)))
Theorem	qliftf 6775*	The domain and codomain of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹:(𝑋 / 𝑅)⟶𝑌))
Theorem	qliftval 6776*	The value of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘[𝐶]𝑅) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ecoptocl 6777*	Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class of ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐵 × 𝐶) / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → 𝜓)
Theorem	2ecoptocl 6778*	Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐶 × 𝐷) / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩]𝑅 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜒)
Theorem	3ecoptocl 6779*	Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐷 × 𝐷) / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩]𝑅 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩]𝑅 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐷)) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜃)
Theorem	brecop 6780*	Binary relation on a quotient set. Lemma for real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝐺 × 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ ≤ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝜑))}    &   ⊢ ((((𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺))) → (([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ = [⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ∧ [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ = [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ≤ [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	eroveu 6781*	Lemma for eroprf 6783. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Er 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Er 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠 ∧ 𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾)) → ∃!𝑧∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇))
Theorem	erovlem 6782*	Lemma for eroprf 6783. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Er 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Er 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠 ∧ 𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢)))    &   ⊢ ⨣ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐽, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾 ↦ (℩𝑧∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇))))
Theorem	eroprf 6783*	Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Er 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Er 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠 ∧ 𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢)))    &   ⊢ ⨣ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶 / 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ :(𝐽 × 𝐾)⟶𝐿)
Theorem	eroprf2 6784*	Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / ∼ )    &   ⊢ ⨣ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥 = [𝑝] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)] ∼ )}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐴)⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴))) → ((𝑟 ∼ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑡 ∼ 𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡) ∼ (𝑠 + 𝑢)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ :(𝐽 × 𝐽)⟶𝐽)
Theorem	ecopoveq 6785*	This is the first of several theorems about equivalence relations of the kind used in construction of fractions and signed reals, involving operations on equivalent classes of ordered pairs. This theorem expresses the relation ∼ (specified by the hypothesis) in terms of its operation 𝐹. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∼ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐷) = (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	ecopovsym 6786*	Assuming the operation 𝐹 is commutative, show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∼ 𝐴)
Theorem	ecopovtrn 6787*	Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∼ 𝐶)
Theorem	ecopover 6788*	Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
Theorem	ecopovsymg 6789*	Assuming the operation 𝐹 is commutative, show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∼ 𝐴)
Theorem	ecopovtrng 6790*	Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∼ 𝐶)
Theorem	ecopoverg 6791*	Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
Theorem	th3qlem1 6792*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. The third hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∼ Er 𝑆    &   ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑦 ∼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑧 ∼ 𝑣) → (𝑦 + 𝑧) ∼ (𝑤 + 𝑣)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑆 / ∼ ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑆 / ∼ )) → ∃*𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴 = [𝑦] ∼ ∧ 𝐵 = [𝑧] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑥 = [(𝑦 + 𝑧)] ∼ ))
Theorem	th3qlem2 6793*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. The fourth hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆))) → ((⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩) → (⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩) ∼ (⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ + ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝐴 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩)] ∼ ))
Theorem	th3qcor 6794*	Corollary of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆))) → ((⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩) → (⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩) ∼ (⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ + ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩)] ∼ ))}    ⇒   ⊢ Fun 𝐺
Theorem	th3q 6795*	Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆))) → ((⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩) → (⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩) ∼ (⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ + ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩)] ∼ ))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ 𝐺[⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ) = [(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ + ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)] ∼ )
Theorem	oviec 6796*	Express an operation on equivalence classes of ordered pairs in terms of equivalence class of operations on ordered pairs. See iset.mm for additional comments describing the hypotheses. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    &   ⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ 𝜑))}    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑏) ∧ (𝑣 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑑)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑔 ∧ 𝑤 = ℎ) ∧ (𝑣 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑠)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ + = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐽))}    &   ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑏) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝑔 ∧ 𝑓 = ℎ)) → 𝐽 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝑠)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐷)) → 𝐽 = 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ ∃𝑎∃𝑏∃𝑐∃𝑑((𝑥 = [⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ + ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩)] ∼ ))}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑆))) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝐾 ∼ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ⨣ [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ) = [𝐻] ∼ )
Theorem	ecovcom 6797*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. Most uses will want ecovicom 6798 instead. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = 𝐽    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	ecovicom 6798*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐷 = 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 = 𝐽)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	ecovass 6799*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. In most cases ecoviass 6800 will be more useful. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐽, 𝐾⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐿, 𝑀⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = 𝐿    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = 𝑀    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	ecoviass 6800*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐽, 𝐾⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐿, 𝑀⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐾 = 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))