P. 80 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	caucvgprlemlim 7901*	Lemma for caucvgpr 7902. The putative limit is a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ Q ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝐹‘𝑘)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P (𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑥}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑥 <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ 𝐿<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q 𝑥)}, {𝑢 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q 𝑥) <Q 𝑢}⟩)))
Theorem	caucvgpr 7902*	A Cauchy sequence of positive fractions with a modulus of convergence converges to a positive real. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies) (one key difference being that this is for positive reals rather than signed reals). Also, the HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). We also specify that every term needs to be larger than a fraction 𝐴, to avoid the case where we have positive terms which "converge" to zero (which is not a positive real). This proof (including its lemmas) is similar to the proofs of cauappcvgpr 7882 and caucvgprpr 7932. Reading cauappcvgpr 7882 first (the simplest of the three) might help understanding the other two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ P ∀𝑥 ∈ Q ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝐹‘𝑘)}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P (𝑦 +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑥}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑥 <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ 𝑦<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q 𝑥)}, {𝑢 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q 𝑥) <Q 𝑢}⟩)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemk 7903*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Reciprocals of positive integers decrease as the positive integers increase. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemloccalc 7904*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Rearranging some expressions for caucvgprprlemloc 7923. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 <Q 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 +Q 𝑌) = 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 +Q 𝑋) <Q 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑢 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑀, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q 𝑇}, {𝑢 ∣ 𝑇 <Q 𝑢}⟩)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemell 7905*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Membership in the lower cut of the putative limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ Q ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑋 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑋 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑏)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemelu 7906*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Membership in the upper cut of the putative limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ Q ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑋}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑋 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemcbv 7907*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Change bound variables in Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ N ∀𝑏 ∈ N (𝑎 <N 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘𝑎)<P ((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑎, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑎, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑏)<P ((𝐹‘𝑎) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑎, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑎, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemval 7908*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Cauchy condition expressed in terms of classes. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 <N 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐴)<P ((𝐹‘𝐵) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵)<P ((𝐹‘𝐴) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnkltj 7909*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 <N 𝐽) → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnkeqj 7910*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 = 𝐽) → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnjltk 7911*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 <N 𝐾) → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnkj 7912*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnbj 7913*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Non-existence of two elements of the sequence which are too far from each other. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (((𝐹‘𝐵) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐵, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐵, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩)<P (𝐹‘𝐽))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemml 7914*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The lower cut of the putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemmu 7915*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The upper cut of the putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡 ∈ Q 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemm 7916*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Q 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemopl 7917*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The lower cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemlol 7918*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The lower cut of the putative limit is lower. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemopu 7919*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The upper cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemupu 7920*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The upper cut of the putative limit is upper. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemrnd 7921*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The putative limit is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemdisj 7922*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The putative limit is disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemloc 7923*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The putative limit is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ∀𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 → (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∨ 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemcl 7924*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The putative limit is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ P)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemclphr 7925*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The putative limit is a positive real. Like caucvgprprlemcl 7924 but without a disjoint variable condition between 𝜑 and 𝑟. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ P)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemexbt 7926*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑄}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑄 <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ N (((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑄}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑄 <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P 𝑇)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemexb 7927*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ N)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐿 +P 𝑄) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ((𝐹‘𝑅) +P 𝑄) → ∃𝑏 ∈ N (((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩) +P (𝑄 +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩))<P ((𝐹‘𝑅) +P 𝑄)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemaddq 7928*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ N (𝑋 +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋<P (𝐿 +P 𝑄))
Theorem	caucvgprprlem1 7929*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐾)<P (𝐿 +P 𝑄))
Theorem	caucvgprprlem2 7930*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿<P ((𝐹‘𝐾) +P 𝑄))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemlim 7931*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7932. The putative limit is a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘)<P (𝐿 +P 𝑥) ∧ 𝐿<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P 𝑥))))
Theorem	caucvgprpr 7932*	A Cauchy sequence of positive reals with a modulus of convergence converges to a positive real. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies) (one key difference being that this is for positive reals rather than signed reals). Also, the HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). We also specify that every term needs to be larger than a given value 𝐴, to avoid the case where we have positive terms which "converge" to zero (which is not a positive real). This is similar to caucvgpr 7902 except that values of the sequence are positive reals rather than positive fractions. Reading that proof first (or cauappcvgpr 7882) might help in understanding this one, as they are slightly simpler but similarly structured. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ P ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘)<P (𝑦 +P 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P 𝑥))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemell 7933*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. Membership in the lower cut of the putative supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥))
Theorem	suplocexprlem2b 7934	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. Expression for the lower cut of the putative supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ P → (2nd ‘𝐵) = {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢})
Theorem	suplocexprlemss 7935*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. 𝐴 is a set of positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ P)
Theorem	suplocexprlemml 7936*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. The lower cut of the putative supremum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴))
Theorem	suplocexprlemrl 7937*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. The lower cut of the putative supremum is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemmu 7938*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. The upper cut of the putative supremum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))
Theorem	suplocexprlemru 7939*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. The upper cut of the putative supremum is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemdisj 7940*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. The putative supremum is disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	suplocexprlemloc 7941*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. The putative supremum is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ∨ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemex 7942*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. The putative supremum is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ P)
Theorem	suplocexprlemub 7943*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. The putative supremum is an upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵<P 𝑦)
Theorem	suplocexprlemlub 7944*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7945. The putative supremum is a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦<P 𝐵 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧))
Theorem	suplocexpr 7945*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of positive reals has a supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥<P 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑦<P 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧)))
Definition	df-enr 7946*	Define equivalence relation for signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ~R = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (P × P) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (P × P)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 +P 𝑢) = (𝑤 +P 𝑣)))}
Definition	df-nr 7947	Define class of signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.2 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.)
⊢ R = ((P × P) / ~R )
Definition	df-plr 7948*	Define addition on signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.)
⊢ +R = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ R ∧ 𝑦 ∈ R) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [⟨(𝑤 +P 𝑢), (𝑣 +P 𝑓)⟩] ~R ))}
Definition	df-mr 7949*	Define multiplication on signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ·R = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ R ∧ 𝑦 ∈ R) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [⟨((𝑤 ·P 𝑢) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑓)), ((𝑤 ·P 𝑓) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑢))⟩] ~R ))}
Definition	df-ltr 7950*	Define ordering relation on signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.4 of [Gleason] p. 127. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <R = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ R ∧ 𝑦 ∈ R) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ~R ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ~R ) ∧ (𝑧 +P 𝑢)<P (𝑤 +P 𝑣)))}
Definition	df-0r 7951	Define signed real constant 0. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.2 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 0R = [⟨1P, 1P⟩] ~R
Definition	df-1r 7952	Define signed real constant 1. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.2 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 1R = [⟨(1P +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R
Definition	df-m1r 7953	Define signed real constant -1. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ -1R = [⟨1P, (1P +P 1P)⟩] ~R
Theorem	enrbreq 7954	Equivalence relation for signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ~R ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ (𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶)))
Theorem	enrer 7955	The equivalence relation for signed reals is an equivalence relation. Proposition 9-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ~R Er (P × P)
Theorem	enreceq 7956	Equivalence class equality of positive fractions in terms of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R = [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ~R ↔ (𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶)))
Theorem	enrex 7957	The equivalence relation for signed reals exists. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ~R ∈ V
Theorem	ltrelsr 7958	Signed real 'less than' is a relation on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <R ⊆ (R × R)
Theorem	addcmpblnr 7959	Lemma showing compatibility of addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.)
⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ P ∧ 𝐺 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ P ∧ 𝑆 ∈ P))) → (((𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹 +P 𝑆) = (𝐺 +P 𝑅)) → ⟨(𝐴 +P 𝐹), (𝐵 +P 𝐺)⟩ ~R ⟨(𝐶 +P 𝑅), (𝐷 +P 𝑆)⟩))
Theorem	mulcmpblnrlemg 7960	Lemma used in lemma showing compatibility of multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ P ∧ 𝐺 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ P ∧ 𝑆 ∈ P))) → (((𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹 +P 𝑆) = (𝐺 +P 𝑅)) → ((𝐷 ·P 𝐹) +P (((𝐴 ·P 𝐹) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐺)) +P ((𝐶 ·P 𝑆) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑅)))) = ((𝐷 ·P 𝐹) +P (((𝐴 ·P 𝐺) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐹)) +P ((𝐶 ·P 𝑅) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑆))))))
Theorem	mulcmpblnr 7961	Lemma showing compatibility of multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-1995.)
⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ P ∧ 𝐺 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ P ∧ 𝑆 ∈ P))) → (((𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹 +P 𝑆) = (𝐺 +P 𝑅)) → ⟨((𝐴 ·P 𝐹) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐺)), ((𝐴 ·P 𝐺) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐹))⟩ ~R ⟨((𝐶 ·P 𝑅) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑆)), ((𝐶 ·P 𝑆) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	prsrlem1 7962*	Decomposing signed reals into positive reals. Lemma for addsrpr 7965 and mulsrpr 7966. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R )) ∧ ((𝐴 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ~R ) ∧ (𝐴 = [⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩] ~R ))) → ((((𝑤 ∈ P ∧ 𝑣 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑠 ∈ P ∧ 𝑓 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ P ∧ 𝑡 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ P ∧ ℎ ∈ P))) ∧ ((𝑤 +P 𝑓) = (𝑣 +P 𝑠) ∧ (𝑢 +P ℎ) = (𝑡 +P 𝑔))))
Theorem	addsrmo 7963*	There is at most one result from adding signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R )) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝐴 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [⟨(𝑤 +P 𝑢), (𝑣 +P 𝑡)⟩] ~R ))
Theorem	mulsrmo 7964*	There is at most one result from multiplying signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R )) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝐴 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [⟨((𝑤 ·P 𝑢) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑡)), ((𝑤 ·P 𝑡) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑢))⟩] ~R ))
Theorem	addsrpr 7965	Addition of signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R +R [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ~R ) = [⟨(𝐴 +P 𝐶), (𝐵 +P 𝐷)⟩] ~R )
Theorem	mulsrpr 7966	Multiplication of signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R ·R [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ~R ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·P 𝐶) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐷)), ((𝐴 ·P 𝐷) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐶))⟩] ~R )
Theorem	ltsrprg 7967	Ordering of signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R <R [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ~R ↔ (𝐴 +P 𝐷)<P (𝐵 +P 𝐶)))
Theorem	gt0srpr 7968	Greater than zero in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.)
⊢ (0R <R [⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R ↔ 𝐵<P 𝐴)
Theorem	0nsr 7969	The empty set is not a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ R
Theorem	0r 7970	The constant 0R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 0R ∈ R
Theorem	1sr 7971	The constant 1R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 1R ∈ R
Theorem	m1r 7972	The constant -1R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ -1R ∈ R
Theorem	addclsr 7973	Closure of addition on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 +R 𝐵) ∈ R)
Theorem	mulclsr 7974	Closure of multiplication on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 ·R 𝐵) ∈ R)
Theorem	addcomsrg 7975	Addition of signed reals is commutative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 +R 𝐵) = (𝐵 +R 𝐴))
Theorem	addasssrg 7976	Addition of signed reals is associative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ 𝐶 ∈ R) → ((𝐴 +R 𝐵) +R 𝐶) = (𝐴 +R (𝐵 +R 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulcomsrg 7977	Multiplication of signed reals is commutative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 ·R 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·R 𝐴))
Theorem	mulasssrg 7978	Multiplication of signed reals is associative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ 𝐶 ∈ R) → ((𝐴 ·R 𝐵) ·R 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐶)))
Theorem	distrsrg 7979	Multiplication of signed reals is distributive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ 𝐶 ∈ R) → (𝐴 ·R (𝐵 +R 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·R 𝐵) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐶)))
Theorem	m1p1sr 7980	Minus one plus one is zero for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.)
⊢ (-1R +R 1R) = 0R
Theorem	m1m1sr 7981	Minus one times minus one is plus one for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.)
⊢ (-1R ·R -1R) = 1R
Theorem	lttrsr 7982*	Signed real 'less than' is a transitive relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑓 ∈ R ∧ 𝑔 ∈ R ∧ ℎ ∈ R) → ((𝑓 <R 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 <R ℎ) → 𝑓 <R ℎ))
Theorem	ltposr 7983	Signed real 'less than' is a partial order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jan-2019.)
⊢ <R Po R
Theorem	ltsosr 7984	Signed real 'less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <R Or R
Theorem	0lt1sr 7985	0 is less than 1 for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1996.)
⊢ 0R <R 1R
Theorem	1ne0sr 7986	1 and 0 are distinct for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1996.)
⊢ ¬ 1R = 0R
Theorem	0idsr 7987	The signed real number 0 is an identity element for addition of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R 0R) = 𝐴)
Theorem	1idsr 7988	1 is an identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 ·R 1R) = 𝐴)
Theorem	00sr 7989	A signed real times 0 is 0. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 ·R 0R) = 0R)
Theorem	ltasrg 7990	Ordering property of addition. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ 𝐶 ∈ R) → (𝐴 <R 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +R 𝐴) <R (𝐶 +R 𝐵)))
Theorem	pn0sr 7991	A signed real plus its negative is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R (𝐴 ·R -1R)) = 0R)
Theorem	negexsr 7992*	Existence of negative signed real. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 +R 𝑥) = 0R)
Theorem	recexgt0sr 7993*	The reciprocal of a positive signed real exists and is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (0R <R 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (0R <R 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R))
Theorem	recexsrlem 7994*	The reciprocal of a positive signed real exists. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.)
⊢ (0R <R 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R)
Theorem	addgt0sr 7995	The sum of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.)
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 +R 𝐵))
Theorem	ltadd1sr 7996	Adding one to a signed real yields a larger signed real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → 𝐴 <R (𝐴 +R 1R))
Theorem	ltm1sr 7997	Adding minus one to a signed real yields a smaller signed real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R -1R) <R 𝐴)
Theorem	mulgt0sr 7998	The product of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.)
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐵))
Theorem	aptisr 7999	Apartness of signed reals is tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ ¬ (𝐴 <R 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <R 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	mulextsr1lem 8000	Lemma for mulextsr1 8001. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ P ∧ 𝑌 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ P ∧ 𝑊 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ P ∧ 𝑉 ∈ P)) → ((((𝑋 ·P 𝑈) +P (𝑌 ·P 𝑉)) +P ((𝑍 ·P 𝑉) +P (𝑊 ·P 𝑈)))<P (((𝑋 ·P 𝑉) +P (𝑌 ·P 𝑈)) +P ((𝑍 ·P 𝑈) +P (𝑊 ·P 𝑉))) → ((𝑋 +P 𝑊)<P (𝑌 +P 𝑍) ∨ (𝑍 +P 𝑌)<P (𝑊 +P 𝑋))))