P. 80 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	caucvgprprlemval 7901*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Cauchy condition expressed in terms of classes. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 <N 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐴)<P ((𝐹‘𝐵) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵)<P ((𝐹‘𝐴) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐴, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnkltj 7902*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 <N 𝐽) → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnkeqj 7903*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 = 𝐽) → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnjltk 7904*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 <N 𝐾) → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnkj 7905*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Part of disjointness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Q)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑆 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝐾) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐽) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑆}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑆 <Q 𝑞}⟩))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemnbj 7906*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Non-existence of two elements of the sequence which are too far from each other. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ N)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ N)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (((𝐹‘𝐵) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐵, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐵, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩)<P (𝐹‘𝐽))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemml 7907*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The lower cut of the putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemmu 7908*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The upper cut of the putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡 ∈ Q 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemm 7909*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The putative limit is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Q 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemopl 7910*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The lower cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemlol 7911*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The lower cut of the putative limit is lower. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿)) → 𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemopu 7912*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The upper cut of the putative limit is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemupu 7913*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The upper cut of the putative limit is upper. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemrnd 7914*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The putative limit is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿))) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemdisj 7915*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The putative limit is disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemloc 7916*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The putative limit is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ Q ∀𝑡 ∈ Q (𝑠 <Q 𝑡 → (𝑠 ∈ (1st ‘𝐿) ∨ 𝑡 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemcl 7917*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The putative limit is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ P)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemclphr 7918*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The putative limit is a positive real. Like caucvgprprlemcl 7917 but without a disjoint variable condition between 𝜑 and 𝑟. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ P)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemexbt 7919*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ Q)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑄}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑄 <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ N (((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑄}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑄 <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P 𝑇)
Theorem	caucvgprprlemexb 7920*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ N)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐿 +P 𝑄) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ((𝐹‘𝑅) +P 𝑄) → ∃𝑏 ∈ N (((𝐹‘𝑏) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑏, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩) +P (𝑄 +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑅, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩))<P ((𝐹‘𝑅) +P 𝑄)))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemaddq 7921*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ N (𝑋 +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋<P (𝐿 +P 𝑄))
Theorem	caucvgprprlem1 7922*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐾)<P (𝐿 +P 𝑄))
Theorem	caucvgprprlem2 7923*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. Part of showing the putative limit to be a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 <N 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩<P 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿<P ((𝐹‘𝐾) +P 𝑄))
Theorem	caucvgprprlemlim 7924*	Lemma for caucvgprpr 7925. The putative limit is a limit. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ))}, {𝑞 ∣ (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑞}⟩<P (𝐹‘𝑟)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑟) +P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑞 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑟, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑞}⟩)<P ⟨{𝑝 ∣ 𝑝 <Q 𝑢}, {𝑞 ∣ 𝑢 <Q 𝑞}⟩}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘)<P (𝐿 +P 𝑥) ∧ 𝐿<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P 𝑥))))
Theorem	caucvgprpr 7925*	A Cauchy sequence of positive reals with a modulus of convergence converges to a positive real. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies) (one key difference being that this is for positive reals rather than signed reals). Also, the HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). We also specify that every term needs to be larger than a given value 𝐴, to avoid the case where we have positive terms which "converge" to zero (which is not a positive real). This is similar to caucvgpr 7895 except that values of the sequence are positive reals rather than positive fractions. Reading that proof first (or cauappcvgpr 7875) might help in understanding this one, as they are slightly simpler but similarly structured. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛)<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘)<P ((𝐹‘𝑛) +P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ N 𝐴<P (𝐹‘𝑚))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ P ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∃𝑗 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑗 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘)<P (𝑦 +P 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦<P ((𝐹‘𝑘) +P 𝑥))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemell 7926*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. Membership in the lower cut of the putative supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥))
Theorem	suplocexprlem2b 7927	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. Expression for the lower cut of the putative supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ P → (2nd ‘𝐵) = {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢})
Theorem	suplocexprlemss 7928*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. 𝐴 is a set of positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ P)
Theorem	suplocexprlemml 7929*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. The lower cut of the putative supremum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴))
Theorem	suplocexprlemrl 7930*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. The lower cut of the putative supremum is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemmu 7931*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. The upper cut of the putative supremum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))
Theorem	suplocexprlemru 7932*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. The upper cut of the putative supremum is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemdisj 7933*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. The putative supremum is disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	suplocexprlemloc 7934*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. The putative supremum is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ∨ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	suplocexprlemex 7935*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. The putative supremum is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ P)
Theorem	suplocexprlemub 7936*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. The putative supremum is an upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵<P 𝑦)
Theorem	suplocexprlemlub 7937*	Lemma for suplocexpr 7938. The putative supremum is a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦<P 𝐵 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧))
Theorem	suplocexpr 7938*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of positive reals has a supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥<P 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑦<P 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧)))
Definition	df-enr 7939*	Define equivalence relation for signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ~R = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (P × P) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (P × P)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 +P 𝑢) = (𝑤 +P 𝑣)))}
Definition	df-nr 7940	Define class of signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.2 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.)
⊢ R = ((P × P) / ~R )
Definition	df-plr 7941*	Define addition on signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.)
⊢ +R = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ R ∧ 𝑦 ∈ R) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [⟨(𝑤 +P 𝑢), (𝑣 +P 𝑓)⟩] ~R ))}
Definition	df-mr 7942*	Define multiplication on signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ·R = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ R ∧ 𝑦 ∈ R) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [⟨((𝑤 ·P 𝑢) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑓)), ((𝑤 ·P 𝑓) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑢))⟩] ~R ))}
Definition	df-ltr 7943*	Define ordering relation on signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.4 of [Gleason] p. 127. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <R = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ R ∧ 𝑦 ∈ R) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ~R ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ~R ) ∧ (𝑧 +P 𝑢)<P (𝑤 +P 𝑣)))}
Definition	df-0r 7944	Define signed real constant 0. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.2 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 0R = [⟨1P, 1P⟩] ~R
Definition	df-1r 7945	Define signed real constant 1. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.2 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 1R = [⟨(1P +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R
Definition	df-m1r 7946	Define signed real constant -1. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ -1R = [⟨1P, (1P +P 1P)⟩] ~R
Theorem	enrbreq 7947	Equivalence relation for signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ~R ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ (𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶)))
Theorem	enrer 7948	The equivalence relation for signed reals is an equivalence relation. Proposition 9-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ~R Er (P × P)
Theorem	enreceq 7949	Equivalence class equality of positive fractions in terms of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R = [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ~R ↔ (𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶)))
Theorem	enrex 7950	The equivalence relation for signed reals exists. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ~R ∈ V
Theorem	ltrelsr 7951	Signed real 'less than' is a relation on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <R ⊆ (R × R)
Theorem	addcmpblnr 7952	Lemma showing compatibility of addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.)
⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ P ∧ 𝐺 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ P ∧ 𝑆 ∈ P))) → (((𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹 +P 𝑆) = (𝐺 +P 𝑅)) → ⟨(𝐴 +P 𝐹), (𝐵 +P 𝐺)⟩ ~R ⟨(𝐶 +P 𝑅), (𝐷 +P 𝑆)⟩))
Theorem	mulcmpblnrlemg 7953	Lemma used in lemma showing compatibility of multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ P ∧ 𝐺 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ P ∧ 𝑆 ∈ P))) → (((𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹 +P 𝑆) = (𝐺 +P 𝑅)) → ((𝐷 ·P 𝐹) +P (((𝐴 ·P 𝐹) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐺)) +P ((𝐶 ·P 𝑆) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑅)))) = ((𝐷 ·P 𝐹) +P (((𝐴 ·P 𝐺) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐹)) +P ((𝐶 ·P 𝑅) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑆))))))
Theorem	mulcmpblnr 7954	Lemma showing compatibility of multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-1995.)
⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ P ∧ 𝐺 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ P ∧ 𝑆 ∈ P))) → (((𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹 +P 𝑆) = (𝐺 +P 𝑅)) → ⟨((𝐴 ·P 𝐹) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐺)), ((𝐴 ·P 𝐺) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐹))⟩ ~R ⟨((𝐶 ·P 𝑅) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑆)), ((𝐶 ·P 𝑆) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	prsrlem1 7955*	Decomposing signed reals into positive reals. Lemma for addsrpr 7958 and mulsrpr 7959. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R )) ∧ ((𝐴 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ~R ) ∧ (𝐴 = [⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩] ~R ))) → ((((𝑤 ∈ P ∧ 𝑣 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑠 ∈ P ∧ 𝑓 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ P ∧ 𝑡 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ P ∧ ℎ ∈ P))) ∧ ((𝑤 +P 𝑓) = (𝑣 +P 𝑠) ∧ (𝑢 +P ℎ) = (𝑡 +P 𝑔))))
Theorem	addsrmo 7956*	There is at most one result from adding signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R )) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝐴 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [⟨(𝑤 +P 𝑢), (𝑣 +P 𝑡)⟩] ~R ))
Theorem	mulsrmo 7957*	There is at most one result from multiplying signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R )) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝐴 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [⟨((𝑤 ·P 𝑢) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑡)), ((𝑤 ·P 𝑡) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑢))⟩] ~R ))
Theorem	addsrpr 7958	Addition of signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R +R [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ~R ) = [⟨(𝐴 +P 𝐶), (𝐵 +P 𝐷)⟩] ~R )
Theorem	mulsrpr 7959	Multiplication of signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R ·R [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ~R ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·P 𝐶) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐷)), ((𝐴 ·P 𝐷) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐶))⟩] ~R )
Theorem	ltsrprg 7960	Ordering of signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R <R [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ~R ↔ (𝐴 +P 𝐷)<P (𝐵 +P 𝐶)))
Theorem	gt0srpr 7961	Greater than zero in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.)
⊢ (0R <R [⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ~R ↔ 𝐵<P 𝐴)
Theorem	0nsr 7962	The empty set is not a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ R
Theorem	0r 7963	The constant 0R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 0R ∈ R
Theorem	1sr 7964	The constant 1R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 1R ∈ R
Theorem	m1r 7965	The constant -1R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ -1R ∈ R
Theorem	addclsr 7966	Closure of addition on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 +R 𝐵) ∈ R)
Theorem	mulclsr 7967	Closure of multiplication on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 ·R 𝐵) ∈ R)
Theorem	addcomsrg 7968	Addition of signed reals is commutative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 +R 𝐵) = (𝐵 +R 𝐴))
Theorem	addasssrg 7969	Addition of signed reals is associative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ 𝐶 ∈ R) → ((𝐴 +R 𝐵) +R 𝐶) = (𝐴 +R (𝐵 +R 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulcomsrg 7970	Multiplication of signed reals is commutative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 ·R 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·R 𝐴))
Theorem	mulasssrg 7971	Multiplication of signed reals is associative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ 𝐶 ∈ R) → ((𝐴 ·R 𝐵) ·R 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐶)))
Theorem	distrsrg 7972	Multiplication of signed reals is distributive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ 𝐶 ∈ R) → (𝐴 ·R (𝐵 +R 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·R 𝐵) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐶)))
Theorem	m1p1sr 7973	Minus one plus one is zero for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.)
⊢ (-1R +R 1R) = 0R
Theorem	m1m1sr 7974	Minus one times minus one is plus one for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.)
⊢ (-1R ·R -1R) = 1R
Theorem	lttrsr 7975*	Signed real 'less than' is a transitive relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑓 ∈ R ∧ 𝑔 ∈ R ∧ ℎ ∈ R) → ((𝑓 <R 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 <R ℎ) → 𝑓 <R ℎ))
Theorem	ltposr 7976	Signed real 'less than' is a partial order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jan-2019.)
⊢ <R Po R
Theorem	ltsosr 7977	Signed real 'less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <R Or R
Theorem	0lt1sr 7978	0 is less than 1 for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1996.)
⊢ 0R <R 1R
Theorem	1ne0sr 7979	1 and 0 are distinct for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1996.)
⊢ ¬ 1R = 0R
Theorem	0idsr 7980	The signed real number 0 is an identity element for addition of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R 0R) = 𝐴)
Theorem	1idsr 7981	1 is an identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 ·R 1R) = 𝐴)
Theorem	00sr 7982	A signed real times 0 is 0. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 ·R 0R) = 0R)
Theorem	ltasrg 7983	Ordering property of addition. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ 𝐶 ∈ R) → (𝐴 <R 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +R 𝐴) <R (𝐶 +R 𝐵)))
Theorem	pn0sr 7984	A signed real plus its negative is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R (𝐴 ·R -1R)) = 0R)
Theorem	negexsr 7985*	Existence of negative signed real. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 +R 𝑥) = 0R)
Theorem	recexgt0sr 7986*	The reciprocal of a positive signed real exists and is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (0R <R 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (0R <R 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R))
Theorem	recexsrlem 7987*	The reciprocal of a positive signed real exists. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.)
⊢ (0R <R 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R)
Theorem	addgt0sr 7988	The sum of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.)
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 +R 𝐵))
Theorem	ltadd1sr 7989	Adding one to a signed real yields a larger signed real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → 𝐴 <R (𝐴 +R 1R))
Theorem	ltm1sr 7990	Adding minus one to a signed real yields a smaller signed real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R -1R) <R 𝐴)
Theorem	mulgt0sr 7991	The product of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.)
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐵))
Theorem	aptisr 7992	Apartness of signed reals is tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ ¬ (𝐴 <R 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <R 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	mulextsr1lem 7993	Lemma for mulextsr1 7994. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ P ∧ 𝑌 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ P ∧ 𝑊 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ P ∧ 𝑉 ∈ P)) → ((((𝑋 ·P 𝑈) +P (𝑌 ·P 𝑉)) +P ((𝑍 ·P 𝑉) +P (𝑊 ·P 𝑈)))<P (((𝑋 ·P 𝑉) +P (𝑌 ·P 𝑈)) +P ((𝑍 ·P 𝑈) +P (𝑊 ·P 𝑉))) → ((𝑋 +P 𝑊)<P (𝑌 +P 𝑍) ∨ (𝑍 +P 𝑌)<P (𝑊 +P 𝑋))))
Theorem	mulextsr1 7994	Strong extensionality of multiplication of signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R ∧ 𝐶 ∈ R) → ((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) <R (𝐵 ·R 𝐶) → (𝐴 <R 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <R 𝐴)))
Theorem	archsr 7995*	For any signed real, there is an integer that is greater than it. This is also known as the "archimedean property". The expression [⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑥, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑥, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R is the embedding of the positive integer 𝑥 into the signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → ∃𝑥 ∈ N 𝐴 <R [⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑥, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑥, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R )
Theorem	srpospr 7996*	Mapping from a signed real greater than zero to a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 0R <R 𝐴) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ P [⟨(𝑥 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R = 𝐴)
Theorem	prsrcl 7997	Mapping from a positive real to a signed real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → [⟨(𝐴 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R ∈ R)
Theorem	prsrpos 7998	Mapping from a positive real to a signed real yields a result greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → 0R <R [⟨(𝐴 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R )
Theorem	prsradd 7999	Mapping from positive real addition to signed real addition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → [⟨((𝐴 +P 𝐵) +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R = ([⟨(𝐴 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R +R [⟨(𝐵 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R ))
Theorem	prsrlt 8000	Mapping from positive real ordering to signed real ordering. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ [⟨(𝐴 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R <R [⟨(𝐵 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R ))