P. 80 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ltresr 7901	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩ ↔ 𝐴 <R 𝐵)
Theorem	ltresr2 7902	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ (1st ‘𝐴) <R (1st ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	dfcnqs 7903	Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in ℂ from those in R. The trick involves qsid 6656, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that ℂ is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 7880), and allows us to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ℂ = ((R × R) / ◡ E )
Theorem	addcnsrec 7904	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 7903 and mulcnsrec 7905. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩]◡ E + [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩]◡ E ) = [⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)⟩]◡ E )
Theorem	mulcnsrec 7905	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecidg 6655, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 7903. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩]◡ E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩]◡ E ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩]◡ E )
Theorem	addvalex 7906	Existence of a sum. This is dependent on how we define + so once we proceed to real number axioms we will replace it with theorems such as addcl 7999. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	pitonnlem1 7907*	Lemma for pitonn 7910. Two ways to write the number one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨1o, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨1o, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ = 1
Theorem	pitonnlem1p1 7908	Lemma for pitonn 7910. Simplifying an expression involving signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → [⟨(𝐴 +P (1P +P 1P)), (1P +P 1P)⟩] ~R = [⟨(𝐴 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R )
Theorem	pitonnlem2 7909*	Lemma for pitonn 7910. Two ways to add one to a number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ N → (⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ + 1) = ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨(𝐾 +N 1o), 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨(𝐾 +N 1o), 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	pitonn 7910*	Mapping from N to ℕ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)})
Theorem	pitoregt0 7911*	Embedding from N to ℝ yields a number greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → 0 <ℝ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	pitore 7912*	Embedding from N to ℝ. Similar to pitonn 7910 but separate in the sense that we have not proved nnssre 8988 yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	recnnre 7913*	Embedding the reciprocal of a natural number into ℝ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	peano1nnnn 7914*	One is an element of ℕ. This is a counterpart to 1nn 8995 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7962). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ 1 ∈ 𝑁
Theorem	peano2nnnn 7915*	A successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. This is a counterpart to peano2nn 8996 designed for real number axioms which involve to natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7962). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ 𝑁)
Theorem	ltrennb 7916*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <ℝ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ N ∧ 𝐾 ∈ N) → (𝐽 <N 𝐾 ↔ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩))
Theorem	ltrenn 7917*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <ℝ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐽 <N 𝐾 → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	recidpipr 7918*	Another way of saying that a number times its reciprocal is one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ ·P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) = 1P)
Theorem	recidpirqlemcalc 7919	Lemma for recidpirq 7920. Rearranging some of the expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·P 𝐵) = 1P)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝐴 +P 1P) ·P (𝐵 +P 1P)) +P (1P ·P 1P)) +P 1P) = ((((𝐴 +P 1P) ·P 1P) +P (1P ·P (𝐵 +P 1P))) +P (1P +P 1P)))
Theorem	recidpirq 7920*	A real number times its reciprocal is one, where reciprocal is expressed with *Q. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → (⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ · ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = 1)
4.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axcnex 7921	The complex numbers form a set. Use cnex 7998 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	axresscn 7922	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 7966. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	ax1cn 7923	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 7967. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	ax1re 7924	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1re 7968. In the Metamath Proof Explorer, this is not a complex number axiom but is proved from ax-1cn 7967 and the other axioms. It is not known whether we can do so here, but the Metamath Proof Explorer proof (accessed 13-Jan-2020) uses excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	axicn 7925	i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 7969. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Theorem	axaddcl 7926	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 7970 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 7999. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axaddrcl 7927	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 7971 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 8000. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axmulcl 7928	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 7972 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 8001. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axmulrcl 7929	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 7973 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 8002. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axaddf 7930	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 7926. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 7996. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axmulf 7931	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This is the construction-dependent version of ax-mulf 7997 and it should not be referenced outside the construction. We generally prefer to develop our theory using the less specific mulcl 8001. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axaddcom 7932	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcom 7974 be used later. Instead, use addcom 8158. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on real number trichotomy and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	axmulcom 7933	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 7975 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 8003. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	axaddass 7934	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 7976 be used later. Instead, use addass 8004. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	axmulass 7935	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 7977. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axdistr 7936	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 7978 be used later. Instead, use adddi 8006. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axi2m1 7937	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 7979. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Theorem	ax0lt1 7938	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0lt1 7980. The version of this axiom in the Metamath Proof Explorer reads 1 ≠ 0; here we change it to 0 <ℝ 1. The proof of 0 <ℝ 1 from 1 ≠ 0 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (accessed 12-Jan-2020) relies on real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 <ℝ 1
Theorem	ax1rid 7939	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 7981. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ax0id 7940	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0id 7982. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on excluded middle and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	axrnegex 7941*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 7983. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	axprecex 7942*	Existence of positive reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-precex 7984. In treatments which assume excluded middle, the 0 <ℝ 𝐴 condition is generally replaced by 𝐴 ≠ 0, and it may not be necessary to state that the reciproacal is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
Theorem	axcnre 7943*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 7985. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 7944	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 7986. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐴)
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 7945	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 7987. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 <ℝ 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 7946	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 7988. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	axpre-apti 7947	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 7989. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 7948	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 7990. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 7949	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 7991. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-mulext 7950	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <ℝ). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulext 7992. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) <ℝ (𝐵 · 𝐶) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Theorem	rereceu 7951*	The reciprocal from axprecex 7942 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	recriota 7952*	Two ways to express the reciprocal of a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ · 𝑟) = 1) = ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	axarch 7953*	Archimedean axiom. The Archimedean property is more naturally stated once we have defined ℕ. Unless we find another way to state it, we'll just use the right hand side of dfnn2 8986 in stating what we mean by "natural number" in the context of this axiom. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-arch 7993. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑛 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}𝐴 <ℝ 𝑛)
Theorem	peano5nnnn 7954*	Peano's inductive postulate. This is a counterpart to peano5nni 8987 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7962). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑁 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nnindnn 7955*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). This is a counterpart to nnind 9000 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7962). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑁 → 𝜏)
Theorem	nntopi 7956*	Mapping from ℕ to N. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑁 → ∃𝑧 ∈ N ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑧, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑧, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ = 𝐴)
Theorem	axcaucvglemcl 7957*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7962. Mapping to N and R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ N) → (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩) ∈ R)
Theorem	axcaucvglemf 7958*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7962. Mapping to N and R yields a sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:N⟶R)
Theorem	axcaucvglemval 7959*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7962. Value of sequence when mapping to N and R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ N) → (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨(𝐺‘𝐽), 0R⟩)
Theorem	axcaucvglemcau 7960*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7962. The result of mapping to N and R satisfies the Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐺‘𝑛) <R ((𝐺‘𝑘) +R [⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R ) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑘) <R ((𝐺‘𝑛) +R [⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R ))))
Theorem	axcaucvglemres 7961*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7962. Mapping the limit from N and R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑗 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑥)))))
Theorem	axcaucvg 7962*	Real number completeness axiom. A Cauchy sequence with a modulus of convergence converges. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). Because we are stating this axiom before we have introduced notations for ℕ or division, we use 𝑁 for the natural numbers and express a reciprocal in terms of ℩. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-caucvg 7994. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑗 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑥)))))
Theorem	axpre-suploclemres 7963*	Lemma for axpre-suploc 7964. The result. The proof just needs to define 𝐵 as basically the same set as 𝐴 (but expressed as a subset of R rather than a subset of ℝ), and apply suplocsr 7871. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑤 ∈ R ∣ ⟨𝑤, 0R⟩ ∈ 𝐴}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Theorem	axpre-suploc 7964*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given 𝑥 < 𝑦, either there is an element of the set greater than 𝑥, or 𝑦 is an upper bound. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-suploc 7995. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
4.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 7965	The complex numbers form a set. Proofs should normally use cnex 7998 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Axiom	ax-resscn 7966	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 7922. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Axiom	ax-1cn 7967	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 7923. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-1re 7968	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1re 7924. Proofs should use 1re 8020 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
Axiom	ax-icn 7969	i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 7925. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-addcl 7970	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 7926. Proofs should normally use addcl 7999 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-addrcl 7971	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 7927. Proofs should normally use readdcl 8000 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-mulcl 7972	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 7928. Proofs should normally use mulcl 8001 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 7973	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 7929. Proofs should normally use remulcl 8002 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-addcom 7974	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcom 7932. Proofs should normally use addcom 8158 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Axiom	ax-mulcom 7975	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 7933. Proofs should normally use mulcom 8003 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Axiom	ax-addass 7976	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 7934. Proofs should normally use addass 8004 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-mulass 7977	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 7935. Proofs should normally use mulass 8005 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-distr 7978	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 7936. Proofs should normally use adddi 8006 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-i2m1 7979	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 7937. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Axiom	ax-0lt1 7980	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0lt1 7938. Proofs should normally use 0lt1 8148 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 0 <ℝ 1
Axiom	ax-1rid 7981	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 7939. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-0id 7982	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0id 7940. Proofs should normally use addrid 8159 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-rnegex 7983*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 7941. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Axiom	ax-precex 7984*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axprecex 7942. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
Axiom	ax-cnre 7985*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 7943. For naming consistency, use cnre 8017 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Axiom	ax-pre-ltirr 7986	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax-pre-ltirr 7986. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-pre-ltwlin 7987	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltwlin 7945. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 <ℝ 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 7988	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 7946. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Axiom	ax-pre-apti 7989	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-apti 7947. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 7990	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 7948. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 7991	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 7949. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-mulext 7992	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <ℝ). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulext 7950 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) <ℝ (𝐵 · 𝐶) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Axiom	ax-arch 7993*	Archimedean axiom. Definition 3.1(2) of [Geuvers], p. 9. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axarch 7953. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use arch 9240 (which is the same, but stated in terms of ℕ and <). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑛 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}𝐴 <ℝ 𝑛)
Axiom	ax-caucvg 7994*	Completeness. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcaucvg 7962. A Cauchy sequence (as defined here, which has a rate convergence built in) of real numbers converges to a real number. Specifically on rate of convergence, all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use caucvgre 11128 (which is the same, but stated in terms of the ℕ and 1 / 𝑛 notations). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑗 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑥)))))
Axiom	ax-pre-suploc 7995*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given 𝑥 < 𝑦, either there is an element of the set greater than 𝑥, or 𝑦 is an upper bound. Although this and ax-caucvg 7994 are both completeness properties, countable choice would probably be needed to derive this from ax-caucvg 7994. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Axiom	ax-addf 7996	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 7999 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 7996 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 7930. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Axiom	ax-mulf 7997	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This axiom tells us that · is defined only on complex numbers which is analogous to the way that other operations are defined, for example see subf 8223 or eff 11809. However, while Metamath can handle this axiom, if we wish to work with weaker complex number axioms, we can avoid it by using the less specific mulcl 8001. Note that uses of ax-mulf 7997 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) in place of ·, as seen in mpomulf 8011. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 7931. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
4.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
4.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 7998	Alias for ax-cnex 7965. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	addcl 7999	Alias for ax-addcl 7970, for naming consistency with addcli 8025. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 7970 or axaddcl 7926. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	readdcl 8000	Alias for ax-addrcl 7971, for naming consistency with readdcli 8034. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)