HomeHome Intuitionistic Logic Explorer
Theorem List (p. 143 of 145)
< Previous  Next >
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version.

Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  ILE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 14201-14300   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
12.2.5  Decidability of classes

The question of decidability is essential in intuitionistic logic. In intuitionistic set theories, it is natural to define decidability of a set (or class) as decidability of membership in it. One can parameterize this notion with another set (or class) since it is often important to assess decidability of membership in one class among elements of another class. Namely, one will say that "𝐴 is decidable in 𝐵 " if 𝑥𝐵DECID 𝑥𝐴 (see df-dcin 14202).

Note the similarity with the definition of a bounded class as a class for which membership in it is a bounded proposition (df-bdc 14249).

 
Syntaxwdcin 14201 Syntax for decidability of a class in another.
wff 𝐴 DECIDin 𝐵
 
Definitiondf-dcin 14202* Define decidability of a class in another. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Feb-2022.)
(𝐴 DECIDin 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 DECID 𝑥𝐴)
 
Theoremdecidi 14203 Property of being decidable in another class. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Feb-2022.)
(𝐴 DECIDin 𝐵 → (𝑋𝐵 → (𝑋𝐴 ∨ ¬ 𝑋𝐴)))
 
Theoremdecidr 14204* Sufficient condition for being decidable in another class. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Feb-2022.)
(𝜑 → (𝑥𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴 ∨ ¬ 𝑥𝐴)))       (𝜑𝐴 DECIDin 𝐵)
 
Theoremdecidin 14205 If A is a decidable subclass of B (meaning: it is a subclass of B and it is decidable in B), and B is decidable in C, then A is decidable in C. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Feb-2022.)
(𝜑𝐴𝐵)    &   (𝜑𝐴 DECIDin 𝐵)    &   (𝜑𝐵 DECIDin 𝐶)       (𝜑𝐴 DECIDin 𝐶)
 
Theoremuzdcinzz 14206 An upperset of integers is decidable in the integers. Reformulation of eluzdc 9599. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Apr-2020.) (Revised by BJ, 19-Feb-2022.)
(𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (ℤ𝑀) DECIDin ℤ)
 
Theoremsumdc2 14207* Alternate proof of sumdc 11350, without disjoint variable condition on 𝑁, 𝑥 (longer because the statement is taylored to the proof sumdc 11350). (Contributed by BJ, 19-Feb-2022.)
(𝜑𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ𝑀))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (ℤ𝑀)DECID 𝑥𝐴)    &   (𝜑𝑁 ∈ ℤ)       (𝜑DECID 𝑁𝐴)
 
12.2.6  Disjoint union
 
Theoremdjucllem 14208* Lemma for djulcl 7044 and djurcl 7045. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Jul-2022.)
𝑋 ∈ V    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ⟨𝑋, 𝑥⟩)       (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝐹𝐵)‘𝐴) ∈ ({𝑋} × 𝐵))
 
TheoremdjulclALT 14209 Shortening of djulcl 7044 using djucllem 14208. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Jul-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(𝐶𝐴 → ((inl ↾ 𝐴)‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐴𝐵))
 
TheoremdjurclALT 14210 Shortening of djurcl 7045 using djucllem 14208. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Jul-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(𝐶𝐵 → ((inr ↾ 𝐵)‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐴𝐵))
 
12.2.7  Miscellaneous
 
Theoremfunmptd 14211 The maps-to notation defines a function (deduction form).

Note: one should similarly prove a deduction form of funopab4 5249, then prove funmptd 14211 from it, and then prove funmpt 5250 from that: this would reduce global proof length. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Aug-2024.)

(𝜑𝐹 = (𝑥𝐴𝐵))       (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
 
Theoremfnmptd 14212* The maps-to notation defines a function with domain (deduction form). (Contributed by BJ, 5-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑𝐹 = (𝑥𝐴𝐵))    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → 𝐵𝑉)       (𝜑𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
 
Theoremif0ab 14213* Expression of a conditional class as a class abstraction when the False alternative is the empty class: in that case, the conditional class is the extension, in the True alternative, of the condition.

Remark: a consequence which could be formalized is the inclusion if(𝜑, 𝐴, ∅) ⊆ 𝐴 and therefore, using elpwg 3582, (𝐴𝑉 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, ∅) ∈ 𝒫 𝐴), from which fmelpw1o 14214 could be derived, yielding an alternative proof. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Aug-2024.)

if(𝜑, 𝐴, ∅) = {𝑥𝐴𝜑}
 
Theoremfmelpw1o 14214 With a formula 𝜑 one can associate an element of 𝒫 1o, which can therefore be thought of as the set of "truth values" (but recall that there are no other genuine truth values than and , by nndc 851, which translate to 1o and respectively by iftrue 3539 and iffalse 3542, giving pwtrufal 14403).

As proved in if0ab 14213, the associated element of 𝒫 1o is the extension, in 𝒫 1o, of the formula 𝜑. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)

if(𝜑, 1o, ∅) ∈ 𝒫 1o
 
Theorembj-charfun 14215* Properties of the characteristic function on the class 𝑋 of the class 𝐴. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑𝐹 = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ if(𝑥𝐴, 1o, ∅)))       (𝜑 → ((𝐹:𝑋⟶𝒫 1o ∧ (𝐹 ↾ ((𝑋𝐴) ∪ (𝑋𝐴))):((𝑋𝐴) ∪ (𝑋𝐴))⟶2o) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝐹𝑥) = 1o ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝐹𝑥) = ∅)))
 
Theorembj-charfundc 14216* Properties of the characteristic function on the class 𝑋 of the class 𝐴, provided membership in 𝐴 is decidable in 𝑋. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑𝐹 = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ if(𝑥𝐴, 1o, ∅)))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑋 DECID 𝑥𝐴)       (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝑋⟶2o ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝐹𝑥) = 1o ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝐹𝑥) = ∅)))
 
Theorembj-charfundcALT 14217* Alternate proof of bj-charfundc 14216. It was expected to be much shorter since it uses bj-charfun 14215 for the main part of the proof and the rest is basic computations, but these turn out to be lengthy, maybe because of the limited library of available lemmas. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(𝜑𝐹 = (𝑥𝑋 ↦ if(𝑥𝐴, 1o, ∅)))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑋 DECID 𝑥𝐴)       (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝑋⟶2o ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝐹𝑥) = 1o ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝐹𝑥) = ∅)))
 
Theorembj-charfunr 14218* If a class 𝐴 has a "weak" characteristic function on a class 𝑋, then negated membership in 𝐴 is decidable (in other words, membership in 𝐴 is testable) in 𝑋.

The hypothesis imposes that 𝑋 be a set. As usual, it could be formulated as (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝑋⟶ω ∧ ...)) to deal with general classes, but that extra generality would not make the theorem much more useful.

The theorem would still hold if the codomain of 𝑓 were any class with testable equality to the point where (𝑋𝐴) is sent. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Aug-2024.)

(𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ω ↑𝑚 𝑋)(∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝑓𝑥) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝑓𝑥) = ∅))       (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑋 DECID ¬ 𝑥𝐴)
 
Theorembj-charfunbi 14219* In an ambient set 𝑋, if membership in 𝐴 is stable, then it is decidable if and only if 𝐴 has a characteristic function.

This characterization can be applied to singletons when the set 𝑋 has stable equality, which is the case as soon as it has a tight apartness relation. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Aug-2024.)

(𝜑𝑋𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑋 STAB 𝑥𝐴)       (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝑋 DECID 𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ (2o𝑚 𝑋)(∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝑓𝑥) = 1o ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋𝐴)(𝑓𝑥) = ∅)))
 
12.2.8  Constructive Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (CZF): Bounded formulas and classes

This section develops constructive Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (CZF) on top of intuitionistic logic. It is a constructive theory in the sense that its logic is intuitionistic and it is predicative. "Predicative" means that new sets can be constructed only from already constructed sets. In particular, the axiom of separation ax-sep 4118 is not predicative (because we cannot allow all formulas to define a subset) and is replaced in CZF by bounded separation ax-bdsep 14292. Because this axiom is weaker than full separation, the axiom of replacement or collection ax-coll 4115 of ZF and IZF has to be strengthened in CZF to the axiom of strong collection ax-strcoll 14390 (which is a theorem of IZF), and the axiom of infinity needs a more precise version, the von Neumann axiom of infinity ax-infvn 14349. Similarly, the axiom of powerset ax-pow 4171 is not predicative (checking whether a set is included in another requires to universally quantifier over that "not yet constructed" set) and is replaced in CZF by the axiom of fullness or the axiom of subset collection ax-sscoll 14395.

In an intuitionistic context, the axiom of regularity is stated in IZF as well as in CZF as the axiom of set induction ax-setind 4533. It is sometimes interesting to study the weakening of CZF where that axiom is replaced by bounded set induction ax-bdsetind 14376.

For more details on CZF, a useful set of notes is

Peter Aczel and Michael Rathjen, CST Book draft. (available at http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~rathjen/book.pdf 14376)

and an interesting article is

Michael Shulman, Comparing material and structural set theories, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Volume 170, Issue 4 (Apr. 2019), 465--504. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.05204 14376

I also thank Michael Rathjen and Michael Shulman for useful hints in the formulation of some results.

 
12.2.8.1  Bounded formulas

The present definition of bounded formulas emerged from a discussion on GitHub between Jim Kingdon, Mario Carneiro and I, started 23-Sept-2019 (see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/1173 and links therein).

In order to state certain axiom schemes of Constructive Zermelo–Fraenkel (CZF) set theory, like the axiom scheme of bounded (or restricted, or Δ0) separation, it is necessary to distinguish certain formulas, called bounded (or restricted, or Δ0) formulas. The necessity of considering bounded formulas also arises in several theories of bounded arithmetic, both classical or intuitionistic, for instance to state the axiom scheme of Δ0-induction.

To formalize this in Metamath, there are several choices to make.

A first choice is to either create a new type for bounded formulas, or to create a predicate on formulas that indicates whether they are bounded. In the first case, one creates a new type "wff0" with a new set of metavariables (ph0 ...) and an axiom "$a wff ph0 " ensuring that bounded formulas are formulas, so that one can reuse existing theorems, and then axioms take the form "$a wff0 ( ph0 -> ps0 )", etc. In the second case, one introduces a predicate "BOUNDED " with the intended meaning that "BOUNDED 𝜑 " is a formula meaning that 𝜑 is a bounded formula. We choose the second option, since the first would complicate the grammar, risking to make it ambiguous. (TODO: elaborate.)

A second choice is to view "bounded" either as a syntactic or a semantic property. For instance, 𝑥 is not syntactically bounded since it has an unbounded universal quantifier, but it is semantically bounded since it is equivalent to which is bounded. We choose the second option, so that formulas using defined symbols can be proved bounded.

A third choice is in the form of the axioms, either in closed form or in inference form. One cannot state all the axioms in closed form, especially ax-bd0 14221. Indeed, if we posited it in closed form, then we could prove for instance (𝜑BOUNDED 𝜑) and 𝜑BOUNDED 𝜑) which is problematic (with the law of excluded middle, this would entail that all formulas are bounded, but even without it, too many formulas could be proved bounded...). (TODO: elaborate.)

Having ax-bd0 14221 in inference form ensures that a formula can be proved bounded only if it is equivalent *for all values of the free variables* to a syntactically bounded one. The other axioms (ax-bdim 14222 through ax-bdsb 14230) can be written either in closed or inference form. The fact that ax-bd0 14221 is an inference is enough to ensure that the closed forms cannot be "exploited" to prove that some unbounded formulas are bounded. (TODO: check.) However, we state all the axioms in inference form to make it clear that we do not exploit any over-permissiveness.

Finally, note that our logic has no terms, only variables. Therefore, we cannot prove for instance that 𝑥 ∈ ω is a bounded formula. However, since ω can be defined as "the 𝑦 such that PHI" a proof using the fact that 𝑥 ∈ ω is bounded can be converted to a proof in iset.mm by replacing ω with 𝑦 everywhere and prepending the antecedent PHI, since 𝑥𝑦 is bounded by ax-bdel 14229. For a similar method, see bj-omtrans 14364.

Note that one cannot add an axiom BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴 since by bdph 14258 it would imply that every formula is bounded.

 
Syntaxwbd 14220 Syntax for the predicate BOUNDED.
wff BOUNDED 𝜑
 
Axiomax-bd0 14221 If two formulas are equivalent, then boundedness of one implies boundedness of the other. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (BOUNDED 𝜑BOUNDED 𝜓)
 
Axiomax-bdim 14222 An implication between two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)
 
Axiomax-bdan 14223 The conjunction of two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)
 
Axiomax-bdor 14224 The disjunction of two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)
 
Axiomax-bdn 14225 The negation of a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED ¬ 𝜑
 
Axiomax-bdal 14226* A bounded universal quantification of a bounded formula is bounded. Note the disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED𝑥𝑦 𝜑
 
Axiomax-bdex 14227* A bounded existential quantification of a bounded formula is bounded. Note the disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED𝑥𝑦 𝜑
 
Axiomax-bdeq 14228 An atomic formula is bounded (equality predicate). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥 = 𝑦
 
Axiomax-bdel 14229 An atomic formula is bounded (membership predicate). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥𝑦
 
Axiomax-bdsb 14230 A formula resulting from proper substitution in a bounded formula is bounded. This probably cannot be proved from the other axioms, since neither the definiens in df-sb 1763, nor probably any other equivalent formula, is syntactically bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
 
Theorembdeq 14231 Equality property for the predicate BOUNDED. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (BOUNDED 𝜑BOUNDED 𝜓)
 
Theorembd0 14232 A formula equivalent to a bounded one is bounded. See also bd0r 14233. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   (𝜑𝜓)       BOUNDED 𝜓
 
Theorembd0r 14233 A formula equivalent to a bounded one is bounded. Stated with a commuted (compared with bd0 14232) biconditional in the hypothesis, to work better with definitions (𝜓 is the definiendum that one wants to prove bounded). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   (𝜓𝜑)       BOUNDED 𝜓
 
Theorembdbi 14234 A biconditional between two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)
 
Theorembdstab 14235 Stability of a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED STAB 𝜑
 
Theorembddc 14236 Decidability of a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED DECID 𝜑
 
Theorembd3or 14237 A disjunction of three bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓    &   BOUNDED 𝜒       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓𝜒)
 
Theorembd3an 14238 A conjunction of three bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓    &   BOUNDED 𝜒       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓𝜒)
 
Theorembdth 14239 A truth (a (closed) theorem) is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
𝜑       BOUNDED 𝜑
 
Theorembdtru 14240 The truth value is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED
 
Theorembdfal 14241 The truth value is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED
 
Theorembdnth 14242 A falsity is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
¬ 𝜑       BOUNDED 𝜑
 
TheorembdnthALT 14243 Alternate proof of bdnth 14242 not using bdfal 14241. Then, bdfal 14241 can be proved from this theorem, using fal 1360. The total number of proof steps would be 17 (for bdnthALT 14243) + 3 = 20, which is more than 8 (for bdfal 14241) + 9 (for bdnth 14242) = 17. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
¬ 𝜑       BOUNDED 𝜑
 
Theorembdxor 14244 The exclusive disjunction of two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜓       BOUNDED (𝜑𝜓)
 
Theorembj-bdcel 14245* Boundedness of a membership formula. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑦 = 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝐴𝑥
 
Theorembdab 14246 Membership in a class defined by class abstraction using a bounded formula, is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED 𝑥 ∈ {𝑦𝜑}
 
Theorembdcdeq 14247 Conditional equality of a bounded formula is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED CondEq(𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑)
 
12.2.8.2  Bounded classes

In line with our definitions of classes as extensions of predicates, it is useful to define a predicate for bounded classes, which is done in df-bdc 14249. Note that this notion is only a technical device which can be used to shorten proofs of (semantic) boundedness of formulas.

As will be clear by the end of this subsection (see for instance bdop 14283), one can prove the boundedness of any concrete term using only setvars and bounded formulas, for instance, BOUNDED 𝜑 BOUNDED ⟨{𝑥𝜑}, ({𝑦, suc 𝑧} × ⟨𝑡, ∅⟩)⟩. The proofs are long since one has to prove boundedness at each step of the construction, without being able to prove general theorems like BOUNDED 𝐴BOUNDED {𝐴}.

 
Syntaxwbdc 14248 Syntax for the predicate BOUNDED.
wff BOUNDED 𝐴
 
Definitiondf-bdc 14249* Define a bounded class as one such that membership in this class is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
(BOUNDED 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴)
 
Theorembdceq 14250 Equality property for the predicate BOUNDED. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
𝐴 = 𝐵       (BOUNDED 𝐴BOUNDED 𝐵)
 
Theorembdceqi 14251 A class equal to a bounded one is bounded. Note the use of ax-ext 2159. See also bdceqir 14252. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   𝐴 = 𝐵       BOUNDED 𝐵
 
Theorembdceqir 14252 A class equal to a bounded one is bounded. Stated with a commuted (compared with bdceqi 14251) equality in the hypothesis, to work better with definitions (𝐵 is the definiendum that one wants to prove bounded; see comment of bd0r 14233). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   𝐵 = 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝐵
 
Theorembdel 14253* The belonging of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
(BOUNDED 𝐴BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴)
 
Theorembdeli 14254* Inference associated with bdel 14253. Its converse is bdelir 14255. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴
 
Theorembdelir 14255* Inference associated with df-bdc 14249. Its converse is bdeli 14254. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴       BOUNDED 𝐴
 
Theorembdcv 14256 A setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥
 
Theorembdcab 14257 A class defined by class abstraction using a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED {𝑥𝜑}
 
Theorembdph 14258 A formula which defines (by class abstraction) a bounded class is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED {𝑥𝜑}       BOUNDED 𝜑
 
Theorembds 14259* Boundedness of a formula resulting from implicit substitution in a bounded formula. Note that the proof does not use ax-bdsb 14230; therefore, using implicit instead of explicit substitution when boundedness is important, one might avoid using ax-bdsb 14230. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       BOUNDED 𝜓
 
Theorembdcrab 14260* A class defined by restricted abstraction from a bounded class and a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED {𝑥𝐴𝜑}
 
Theorembdne 14261 Inequality of two setvars is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥𝑦
 
Theorembdnel 14262* Non-membership of a setvar in a bounded formula is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴
 
Theorembdreu 14263* Boundedness of existential uniqueness.

Remark regarding restricted quantifiers: the formula 𝑥𝐴𝜑 need not be bounded even if 𝐴 and 𝜑 are. Indeed, V is bounded by bdcvv 14265, and (∀𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑) (in minimal propositional calculus), so by bd0 14232, if 𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 were bounded when 𝜑 is bounded, then 𝑥𝜑 would be bounded as well when 𝜑 is bounded, which is not the case. The same remark holds with ∃, ∃!, ∃*. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)

BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED ∃!𝑥𝑦 𝜑
 
Theorembdrmo 14264* Boundedness of existential at-most-one. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED ∃*𝑥𝑦 𝜑
 
Theorembdcvv 14265 The universal class is bounded. The formulation may sound strange, but recall that here, "bounded" means "Δ0". (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED V
 
Theorembdsbc 14266 A formula resulting from proper substitution of a setvar for a setvar in a bounded formula is bounded. See also bdsbcALT 14267. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
 
TheorembdsbcALT 14267 Alternate proof of bdsbc 14266. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       BOUNDED [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
 
Theorembdccsb 14268 A class resulting from proper substitution of a setvar for a setvar in a bounded class is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑦 / 𝑥𝐴
 
Theorembdcdif 14269 The difference of two bounded classes is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   BOUNDED 𝐵       BOUNDED (𝐴𝐵)
 
Theorembdcun 14270 The union of two bounded classes is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   BOUNDED 𝐵       BOUNDED (𝐴𝐵)
 
Theorembdcin 14271 The intersection of two bounded classes is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴    &   BOUNDED 𝐵       BOUNDED (𝐴𝐵)
 
Theorembdss 14272 The inclusion of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. Note: apparently, we cannot prove from the present axioms that equality of two bounded classes is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝐴
 
Theorembdcnul 14273 The empty class is bounded. See also bdcnulALT 14274. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED
 
TheorembdcnulALT 14274 Alternate proof of bdcnul 14273. Similarly, for the next few theorems proving boundedness of a class, one can either use their definition followed by bdceqir 14252, or use the corresponding characterizations of its elements followed by bdelir 14255. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
BOUNDED
 
Theorembdeq0 14275 Boundedness of the formula expressing that a setvar is equal to the empty class. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥 = ∅
 
Theorembj-bd0el 14276 Boundedness of the formula "the empty set belongs to the setvar 𝑥". (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED ∅ ∈ 𝑥
 
Theorembdcpw 14277 The power class of a bounded class is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝒫 𝐴
 
Theorembdcsn 14278 The singleton of a setvar is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED {𝑥}
 
Theorembdcpr 14279 The pair of two setvars is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED {𝑥, 𝑦}
 
Theorembdctp 14280 The unordered triple of three setvars is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED {𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧}
 
Theorembdsnss 14281* Inclusion of a singleton of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED {𝑥} ⊆ 𝐴
 
Theorembdvsn 14282* Equality of a setvar with a singleton of a setvar is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥 = {𝑦}
 
Theorembdop 14283 The ordered pair of two setvars is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED𝑥, 𝑦
 
Theorembdcuni 14284 The union of a setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥
 
Theorembdcint 14285 The intersection of a setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥
 
Theorembdciun 14286* The indexed union of a bounded class with a setvar indexing set is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝑦 𝐴
 
Theorembdciin 14287* The indexed intersection of a bounded class with a setvar indexing set is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝐴       BOUNDED 𝑥𝑦 𝐴
 
Theorembdcsuc 14288 The successor of a setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED suc 𝑥
 
Theorembdeqsuc 14289* Boundedness of the formula expressing that a setvar is equal to the successor of another. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝑥 = suc 𝑦
 
Theorembj-bdsucel 14290 Boundedness of the formula "the successor of the setvar 𝑥 belongs to the setvar 𝑦". (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED suc 𝑥𝑦
 
Theorembdcriota 14291* A class given by a restricted definition binder is bounded, under the given hypotheses. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   ∃!𝑥𝑦 𝜑       BOUNDED (𝑥𝑦 𝜑)
 
12.2.9  CZF: Bounded separation

In this section, we state the axiom scheme of bounded separation, which is part of CZF set theory.

 
Axiomax-bdsep 14292* Axiom scheme of bounded (or restricted, or Δ0) separation. It is stated with all possible disjoint variable conditions, to show that this weak form is sufficient. For the full axiom of separation, see ax-sep 4118. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑎𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))
 
Theorembdsep1 14293* Version of ax-bdsep 14292 without initial universal quantifier. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))
 
Theorembdsep2 14294* Version of ax-bdsep 14292 with one disjoint variable condition removed and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 14293 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))
 
Theorembdsepnft 14295* Closed form of bdsepnf 14296. Version of ax-bdsep 14292 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a nonfreeness antecedent, and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 14293 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Oct-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       (∀𝑥𝑏𝜑 → ∃𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑)))
 
Theorembdsepnf 14296* Version of ax-bdsep 14292 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a nonfreeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. See also bdsepnfALT 14297. Use bdsep1 14293 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
𝑏𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))
 
TheorembdsepnfALT 14297* Alternate proof of bdsepnf 14296, not using bdsepnft 14295. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
𝑏𝜑    &   BOUNDED 𝜑       𝑏𝑥(𝑥𝑏 ↔ (𝑥𝑎𝜑))
 
Theorembdzfauscl 14298* Closed form of the version of zfauscl 4120 for bounded formulas using bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.)
BOUNDED 𝜑       (𝐴𝑉 → ∃𝑦𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)))
 
Theorembdbm1.3ii 14299* Bounded version of bm1.3ii 4121. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
BOUNDED 𝜑    &   𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝑦𝑥)       𝑥𝑦(𝑦𝑥𝜑)
 
Theorembj-axemptylem 14300* Lemma for bj-axempty 14301 and bj-axempty2 14302. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-nul 4126 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
𝑥𝑦(𝑦𝑥 → ⊥)
    < Previous  Next >

Page List
Jump to page: Contents  1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10700 108 10701-10800 109 10801-10900 110 10901-11000 111 11001-11100 112 11101-11200 113 11201-11300 114 11301-11400 115 11401-11500 116 11501-11600 117 11601-11700 118 11701-11800 119 11801-11900 120 11901-12000 121 12001-12100 122 12101-12200 123 12201-12300 124 12301-12400 125 12401-12500 126 12501-12600 127 12601-12700 128 12701-12800 129 12801-12900 130 12901-13000 131 13001-13100 132 13101-13200 133 13201-13300 134 13301-13400 135 13401-13500 136 13501-13600 137 13601-13700 138 13701-13800 139 13801-13900 140 13901-14000 141 14001-14100 142 14101-14200 143 14201-14300 144 14301-14400 145 14401-14485
  Copyright terms: Public domain < Previous  Next >