![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 118 of 135) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | gcdeq0 11701 | The gcd of two integers is zero iff they are both zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 0 ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0))) | ||
Theorem | gcdn0gt0 11702 | The gcd of two integers is positive (nonzero) iff they are not both zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∧ 𝑁 = 0) ↔ 0 < (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | gcd0id 11703 | The gcd of 0 and an integer is the integer's absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (0 gcd 𝑁) = (abs‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | gcdid0 11704 | The gcd of an integer and 0 is the integer's absolute value. Theorem 1.4(d)2 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 gcd 0) = (abs‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | nn0gcdid0 11705 | The gcd of a nonnegative integer with 0 is itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 gcd 0) = 𝑁) | ||
Theorem | gcdneg 11706 | Negating one operand of the gcd operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd -𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | neggcd 11707 | Negating one operand of the gcd operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (-𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | gcdaddm 11708 | Adding a multiple of one operand of the gcd operator to the other does not alter the result. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + (𝐾 · 𝑀)))) | ||
Theorem | gcdadd 11709 | The GCD of two numbers is the same as the GCD of the left and their sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 + 𝑀))) | ||
Theorem | gcdid 11710 | The gcd of a number and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (𝑁 gcd 𝑁) = (abs‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | gcd1 11711 | The gcd of a number with 1 is 1. Theorem 1.4(d)1 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 gcd 1) = 1) | ||
Theorem | gcdabs 11712 | The gcd of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑀) gcd (abs‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | gcdabs1 11713 | gcd of the absolute value of the first operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑁) gcd 𝑀) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | gcdabs2 11714 | gcd of the absolute value of the second operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 gcd (abs‘𝑀)) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | modgcd 11715 | The gcd remains unchanged if one operand is replaced with its remainder modulo the other. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝑀 mod 𝑁) gcd 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | 1gcd 11716 | The GCD of one and an integer is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (1 gcd 𝑀) = 1) | ||
Theorem | gcdmultipled 11717 | The greatest common divisor of a nonnegative integer 𝑀 and a multiple of it is 𝑀 itself. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd (𝑁 · 𝑀)) = 𝑀) | ||
Theorem | dvdsgcdidd 11718 | The greatest common divisor of a positive integer and another integer it divides is itself. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 𝑀) | ||
Theorem | 6gcd4e2 11719 | The greatest common divisor of six and four is two. To calculate this gcd, a simple form of Euclid's algorithm is used: (6 gcd 4) = ((4 + 2) gcd 4) = (2 gcd 4) and (2 gcd 4) = (2 gcd (2 + 2)) = (2 gcd 2) = 2. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (6 gcd 4) = 2 | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemnewy 11720* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. The is-bezout predicate holds for (𝑦 mod 𝑊). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℤ 𝑟 = ((𝐴 · 𝑠) + (𝐵 · 𝑡))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → [𝑦 / 𝑟]𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜃 → [𝑊 / 𝑟]𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜃 → [(𝑦 mod 𝑊) / 𝑟]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemstep 11721* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. This is the induction step for the proof by induction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℤ 𝑟 = ((𝐴 · 𝑠) + (𝐵 · 𝑡))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → [𝑦 / 𝑟]𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜃 → [𝑊 / 𝑟]𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑧 ∥ 𝑟 → (𝑧 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑦))) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ [(𝑦 mod 𝑊) / 𝑟]𝜑) → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ0 ([(𝑦 mod 𝑊) / 𝑥][𝑊 / 𝑦]𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜃 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑟𝜃 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜃 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ0 ([𝑊 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemmain 11722* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. This is the main result which we prove by induction and which represents the application of the Extended Euclidean algorithm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℤ 𝑟 = ((𝐴 · 𝑠) + (𝐵 · 𝑡))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑧 ∥ 𝑟 → (𝑧 ∥ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜃 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ([𝑥 / 𝑟]𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ([𝑦 / 𝑟]𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ0 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)))) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlema 11723* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. The is-bezout condition is satisfied by 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℤ 𝑟 = ((𝐴 · 𝑠) + (𝐵 · 𝑡))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜃 → [𝐴 / 𝑟]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemb 11724* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. The is-bezout condition is satisfied by 𝐵. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℤ 𝑟 = ((𝐴 · 𝑠) + (𝐵 · 𝑡))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜃 → [𝐵 / 𝑟]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemex 11725* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. Existence of a number which we will later show to be the greater common divisor and its decomposition into cofactors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 (∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 → (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑑 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemzz 11726* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. Like bezoutlemex 11725 but where ' z ' is any integer, not just a nonnegative one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 (∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 → (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑑 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemaz 11727* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. Like bezoutlemzz 11726 but where ' A ' can be any integer, not just a nonnegative one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 (∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 → (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑑 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlembz 11728* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. Like bezoutlemaz 11727 but where ' B ' can be any integer, not just a nonnegative one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 (∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 → (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑑 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlembi 11729* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. Like bezoutlembz 11728 but the greatest common divisor condition is a biconditional, not just an implication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 (∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑑 = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemmo 11730* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. There is at most one nonnegative integer meeting the greatest common divisor condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐸 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐸) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemeu 11731* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. There is exactly one nonnegative integer meeting the greatest common divisor condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemle 11732* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. The number satisfying the greatest common divisor condition is the largest number which divides both 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 = 0 ∧ 𝐵 = 0)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ ((𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | bezoutlemsup 11733* | Lemma for Bézout's identity. The number satisfying the greatest common divisor condition is the supremum of divisors of both 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 = 0 ∧ 𝐵 = 0)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = sup({𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑧 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝐵)}, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | dfgcd3 11734* | Alternate definition of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (℩𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)))) | ||
Theorem | bezout 11735* |
Bézout's identity: For any integers 𝐴 and 𝐵, there are
integers 𝑥, 𝑦 such that (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 𝐴 · 𝑥 + 𝐵 · 𝑦. This
is Metamath 100 proof #60.
The proof is constructive, in the sense that it applies the Extended Euclidian Algorithm to constuct a number which can be shown to be (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) and which satisfies the rest of the theorem. In the presence of excluded middle, it is common to prove Bézout's identity by taking the smallest number which satisfies the Bézout condition, and showing it is the greatest common divisor. But we do not have the ability to show that number exists other than by providing a way to determine it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝑥) + (𝐵 · 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | dvdsgcd 11736 | An integer which divides each of two others also divides their gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | dvdsgcdb 11737 | Biconditional form of dvdsgcd 11736. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁) ↔ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | dfgcd2 11738* | Alternate definition of the gcd operator, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 15. (Contributed by AV, 8-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐷 = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ↔ (0 ≤ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐷 ∥ 𝑁) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ ℤ ((𝑒 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑒 ∥ 𝑁) → 𝑒 ∥ 𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | gcdass 11739 | Associative law for gcd operator. Theorem 1.4(b) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑁 gcd 𝑀) gcd 𝑃) = (𝑁 gcd (𝑀 gcd 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | mulgcd 11740 | Distribute multiplication by a nonnegative integer over gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) gcd (𝐾 · 𝑁)) = (𝐾 · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | absmulgcd 11741 | Distribute absolute value of multiplication over gcd. Theorem 1.4(c) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) gcd (𝐾 · 𝑁)) = (abs‘(𝐾 · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)))) | ||
Theorem | mulgcdr 11742 | Reverse distribution law for the gcd operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) gcd (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) · 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | gcddiv 11743 | Division law for GCD. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐶 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∥ 𝐵)) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) / 𝐶) = ((𝐴 / 𝐶) gcd (𝐵 / 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | gcdmultiple 11744 | The GCD of a multiple of a number is the number itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = 𝑀) | ||
Theorem | gcdmultiplez 11745 | Extend gcdmultiple 11744 so 𝑁 can be an integer. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = 𝑀) | ||
Theorem | gcdzeq 11746 | A positive integer 𝐴 is equal to its gcd with an integer 𝐵 if and only if 𝐴 divides 𝐵. Generalization of gcdeq 11747. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | gcdeq 11747 | 𝐴 is equal to its gcd with 𝐵 if and only if 𝐴 divides 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | dvdssqim 11748 | Unidirectional form of dvdssq 11755. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑁↑2))) | ||
Theorem | dvdsmulgcd 11749 | Relationship between the order of an element and that of a multiple. (a divisibility equivalent). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 · (𝐶 gcd 𝐴)))) | ||
Theorem | rpmulgcd 11750 | If 𝐾 and 𝑀 are relatively prime, then the GCD of 𝐾 and 𝑀 · 𝑁 is the GCD of 𝐾 and 𝑁. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1) → (𝐾 gcd (𝑀 · 𝑁)) = (𝐾 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | rplpwr 11751 | If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd 𝐵) = 1)) | ||
Theorem | rppwr 11752 | If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵↑𝑁. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1)) | ||
Theorem | sqgcd 11753 | Square distributes over GCD. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝑀 gcd 𝑁)↑2) = ((𝑀↑2) gcd (𝑁↑2))) | ||
Theorem | dvdssqlem 11754 | Lemma for dvdssq 11755. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑁↑2))) | ||
Theorem | dvdssq 11755 | Two numbers are divisible iff their squares are. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑁↑2))) | ||
Theorem | bezoutr 11756 | Partial converse to bezout 11735. Existence of a linear combination does not set the GCD, but it does upper bound it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ)) → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) ∥ ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + (𝐵 · 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | bezoutr1 11757 | Converse of bezout 11735 for when the greater common divisor is one (sufficient condition for relative primality). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴 · 𝑋) + (𝐵 · 𝑌)) = 1 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)) | ||
Theorem | nn0seqcvgd 11758* | A strictly-decreasing nonnegative integer sequence with initial term 𝑁 reaches zero by the 𝑁 th term. Deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0⟶ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (𝐹‘0)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≠ 0 → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) < (𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑁) = 0) | ||
Theorem | ialgrlem1st 11759 | Lemma for ialgr0 11761. Expressing algrflemg 6135 in a form suitable for theorems such as seq3-1 10264 or seqf 10265. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | ialgrlemconst 11760 | Lemma for ialgr0 11761. Closure of a constant function, in a form suitable for theorems such as seq3-1 10264 or seqf 10265. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → ((𝑍 × {𝐴})‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | ialgr0 11761 | The value of the algorithm iterator 𝑅 at 0 is the initial state 𝐴. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = seq𝑀((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (𝑍 × {𝐴})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅‘𝑀) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | algrf 11762 |
An algorithm is a step function 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 on a state space 𝑆.
An algorithm acts on an initial state 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 by iteratively applying
𝐹 to give 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) and so
on. An algorithm is said to halt if a fixed point of 𝐹 is
reached
after a finite number of iterations.
The algorithm iterator 𝑅:ℕ0⟶𝑆 "runs" the algorithm 𝐹 so that (𝑅‘𝑘) is the state after 𝑘 iterations of 𝐹 on the initial state 𝐴. Domain and codomain of the algorithm iterator 𝑅. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = seq𝑀((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (𝑍 × {𝐴})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅:𝑍⟶𝑆) | ||
Theorem | algrp1 11763 | The value of the algorithm iterator 𝑅 at (𝐾 + 1). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = seq𝑀((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (𝑍 × {𝐴})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝑅‘(𝐾 + 1)) = (𝐹‘(𝑅‘𝐾))) | ||
Theorem | alginv 11764* | If 𝐼 is an invariant of 𝐹, then its value is unchanged after any number of iterations of 𝐹. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴})) & ⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐼‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐼‘(𝑅‘𝐾)) = (𝐼‘(𝑅‘0))) | ||
Theorem | algcvg 11765* |
One way to prove that an algorithm halts is to construct a countdown
function 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0 whose
value is guaranteed to decrease for
each iteration of 𝐹 until it reaches 0. That is, if 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆
is not a fixed point of 𝐹, then
(𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) < (𝐶‘𝑋).
If 𝐶 is a countdown function for algorithm 𝐹, the sequence (𝐶‘(𝑅‘𝑘)) reaches 0 after at most 𝑁 steps, where 𝑁 is the value of 𝐶 for the initial state 𝐴. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴})) & ⊢ 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → ((𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) < (𝐶‘𝑧))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐶‘(𝑅‘𝑁)) = 0) | ||
Theorem | algcvgblem 11766 | Lemma for algcvgb 11767. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝑁 ≠ 0 → 𝑁 < 𝑀) ↔ ((𝑀 ≠ 0 → 𝑁 < 𝑀) ∧ (𝑀 = 0 → 𝑁 = 0)))) | ||
Theorem | algcvgb 11767 | Two ways of expressing that 𝐶 is a countdown function for algorithm 𝐹. The first is used in these theorems. The second states the condition more intuitively as a conjunction: if the countdown function's value is currently nonzero, it must decrease at the next step; if it has reached zero, it must remain zero at the next step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 & ⊢ 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 → (((𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) < (𝐶‘𝑋)) ↔ (((𝐶‘𝑋) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) < (𝐶‘𝑋)) ∧ ((𝐶‘𝑋) = 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = 0)))) | ||
Theorem | algcvga 11768* | The countdown function 𝐶 remains 0 after 𝑁 steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴})) & ⊢ 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → ((𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) < (𝐶‘𝑧))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) → (𝐶‘(𝑅‘𝐾)) = 0)) | ||
Theorem | algfx 11769* | If 𝐹 reaches a fixed point when the countdown function 𝐶 reaches 0, 𝐹 remains fixed after 𝑁 steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐹:𝑆⟶𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐹 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴})) & ⊢ 𝐶:𝑆⟶ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → ((𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≠ 0 → (𝐶‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) < (𝐶‘𝑧))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → ((𝐶‘𝑧) = 0 → (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) → (𝑅‘𝐾) = (𝑅‘𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | eucalgval2 11770* | The value of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm on an ordered pair. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)〉)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑀𝐸𝑁) = if(𝑁 = 0, 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉, 〈𝑁, (𝑀 mod 𝑁)〉)) | ||
Theorem | eucalgval 11771* |
Euclid's Algorithm eucalg 11776 computes the greatest common divisor of two
nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its
remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0.
The value of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)〉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0) → (𝐸‘𝑋) = if((2nd ‘𝑋) = 0, 𝑋, 〈(2nd ‘𝑋), ( mod ‘𝑋)〉)) | ||
Theorem | eucalgf 11772* | Domain and codomain of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)〉)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐸:(ℕ0 × ℕ0)⟶(ℕ0 × ℕ0) | ||
Theorem | eucalginv 11773* | The invariant of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm is the gcd operator applied to the state. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)〉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0) → ( gcd ‘(𝐸‘𝑋)) = ( gcd ‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | eucalglt 11774* | The second member of the state decreases with each iteration of the step function 𝐸 for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)〉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0) → ((2nd ‘(𝐸‘𝑋)) ≠ 0 → (2nd ‘(𝐸‘𝑋)) < (2nd ‘𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | eucalgcvga 11775* | Once Euclid's Algorithm halts after 𝑁 steps, the second element of the state remains 0 . (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)〉)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐸 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴})) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (2nd ‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0) → (𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) → (2nd ‘(𝑅‘𝐾)) = 0)) | ||
Theorem | eucalg 11776* |
Euclid's Algorithm computes the greatest common divisor of two
nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its
remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0. Theorem 1.15 in
[ApostolNT] p. 20.
Upon halting, the 1st member of the final state (𝑅‘𝑁) is equal to the gcd of the values comprising the input state 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉. This is Metamath 100 proof #69 (greatest common divisor algorithm). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑦 = 0, 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑦, (𝑥 mod 𝑦)〉)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = seq0((𝐸 ∘ 1st ), (ℕ0 × {𝐴})) & ⊢ 𝐴 = 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (1st ‘(𝑅‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) | ||
According to Wikipedia ("Least common multiple", 27-Aug-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_common_multiple): "In arithmetic and number theory, the least common multiple, lowest common multiple, or smallest common multiple of two integers a and b, usually denoted by lcm(a, b), is the smallest positive integer that is divisible by both a and b. Since division of integers by zero is undefined, this definition has meaning only if a and b are both different from zero. However, some authors define lcm(a,0) as 0 for all a, which is the result of taking the lcm to be the least upper bound in the lattice of divisibility." In this section, an operation calculating the least common multiple of two integers (df-lcm 11778). The definition is valid for all integers, including negative integers and 0, obeying the above mentioned convention. | ||
Syntax | clcm 11777 | Extend the definition of a class to include the least common multiple operator. |
class lcm | ||
Definition | df-lcm 11778* | Define the lcm operator. For example, (6 lcm 9) = 18. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ lcm = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))) | ||
Theorem | lcmmndc 11779 | Decidablity lemma used in various proofs related to lcm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → DECID (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)) | ||
Theorem | lcmval 11780* | Value of the lcm operator. (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) is the least common multiple of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If either 𝑀 or 𝑁 is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. Contrast with df-gcd 11672 and gcdval 11684. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))) | ||
Theorem | lcmcom 11781 | The lcm operator is commutative. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = (𝑁 lcm 𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | lcm0val 11782 | The value, by convention, of the lcm operator when either operand is 0. (Use lcmcom 11781 for a left-hand 0.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 lcm 0) = 0) | ||
Theorem | lcmn0val 11783* | The value of the lcm operator when both operands are nonzero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | lcmcllem 11784* | Lemma for lcmn0cl 11785 and dvdslcm 11786. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∈ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}) | ||
Theorem | lcmn0cl 11785 | Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | dvdslcm 11786 | The lcm of two integers is divisible by each of them. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∧ 𝑁 ∥ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | lcmledvds 11787 | A positive integer which both operands of the lcm operator divide bounds it. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ¬ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)) → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ≤ 𝐾)) | ||
Theorem | lcmeq0 11788 | The lcm of two integers is zero iff either is zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = 0 ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0))) | ||
Theorem | lcmcl 11789 | Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
Theorem | gcddvdslcm 11790 | The greatest common divisor of two numbers divides their least common multiple. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ∥ (𝑀 lcm 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | lcmneg 11791 | Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm -𝑁) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | neglcm 11792 | Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (-𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | lcmabs 11793 | The lcm of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((abs‘𝑀) lcm (abs‘𝑁)) = (𝑀 lcm 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | lcmgcdlem 11794 | Lemma for lcmgcd 11795 and lcmdvds 11796. Prove them for positive 𝑀, 𝑁, and 𝐾. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) = (abs‘(𝑀 · 𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾)) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∥ 𝐾))) | ||
Theorem | lcmgcd 11795 |
The product of two numbers' least common multiple and greatest common
divisor is the absolute value of the product of the two numbers. In
particular, that absolute value is the least common multiple of two
coprime numbers, for which (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1.
Multiple methods exist for proving this, and it is often proven either as a consequence of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic or of Bézout's identity bezout 11735; see e.g. https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_GCD_and_LCM 11735 and https://math.stackexchange.com/a/470827 11735. This proof uses the latter to first confirm it for positive integers 𝑀 and 𝑁 (the "Second Proof" in the above Stack Exchange page), then shows that implies it for all nonzero integer inputs, then finally uses lcm0val 11782 to show it applies when either or both inputs are zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) = (abs‘(𝑀 · 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | lcmdvds 11796 | The lcm of two integers divides any integer the two divide. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) ∥ 𝐾)) | ||
Theorem | lcmid 11797 | The lcm of an integer and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 lcm 𝑀) = (abs‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | lcm1 11798 | The lcm of an integer and 1 is the absolute value of the integer. (Contributed by AV, 23-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (𝑀 lcm 1) = (abs‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | lcmgcdnn 11799 | The product of two positive integers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the product of the two integers. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) · (𝑀 gcd 𝑁)) = (𝑀 · 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | lcmgcdeq 11800 | Two integers' absolute values are equal iff their least common multiple and greatest common divisor are equal. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ↔ (abs‘𝑀) = (abs‘𝑁))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |