P. 83 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8201-8300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	recnd 8201	Deduction from real number to complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	readdcld 8202	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	remulcld 8203	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
4.2.2  Infinity and the extended real number system
Syntax	cpnf 8204	Plus infinity.
class +∞
Syntax	cmnf 8205	Minus infinity.
class -∞
Syntax	cxr 8206	The set of extended reals (includes plus and minus infinity).
class ℝ*
Syntax	clt 8207	'Less than' predicate (extended to include the extended reals).
class <
Syntax	cle 8208	Extend wff notation to include the 'less than or equal to' relation.
class ≤
Definition	df-pnf 8209	Define plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that +∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from -∞ (df-mnf 8210). We use 𝒫 ∪ ℂ to make it independent of the construction of ℂ, and Cantor's Theorem will show that it is different from any member of ℂ and therefore ℝ. See pnfnre 8214 and mnfnre 8215, and we'll also be able to prove +∞ ≠ -∞. A simpler possibility is to define +∞ as ℂ and -∞ as {ℂ}, but that approach requires the Axiom of Regularity to show that +∞ and -∞ are different from each other and from all members of ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ
Definition	df-mnf 8210	Define minus infinity as the power set of plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that -∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from +∞ (see mnfnre 8215). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ -∞ = 𝒫 +∞
Definition	df-xr 8211	Define the set of extended reals that includes plus and minus infinity. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ℝ* = (ℝ ∪ {+∞, -∞})
Definition	df-ltxr 8212*	Define 'less than' on the set of extended reals. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. Note that in our postulates for complex numbers, <ℝ is primitive and not necessarily a relation on ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ < = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦)} ∪ (((ℝ ∪ {-∞}) × {+∞}) ∪ ({-∞} × ℝ)))
Definition	df-le 8213	Define 'less than or equal to' on the extended real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ≤ = ((ℝ* × ℝ*) ∖ ◡ < )
Theorem	pnfnre 8214	Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ +∞ ∉ ℝ
Theorem	mnfnre 8215	Minus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ -∞ ∉ ℝ
Theorem	ressxr 8216	The standard reals are a subset of the extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℝ*
Theorem	rexpssxrxp 8217	The Cartesian product of standard reals are a subset of the Cartesian product of extended reals (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*)
Theorem	rexr 8218	A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	0xr 8219	Zero is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	renepnf 8220	No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ +∞)
Theorem	renemnf 8221	No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ -∞)
Theorem	rexrd 8222	A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	renepnfd 8223	No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ +∞)
Theorem	renemnfd 8224	No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ -∞)
Theorem	pnfxr 8225	Plus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.)
⊢ +∞ ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	pnfex 8226	Plus infinity exists (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ +∞ ∈ V
Theorem	pnfnemnf 8227	Plus and minus infinity are different elements of ℝ*. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞
Theorem	mnfnepnf 8228	Minus and plus infinity are different (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ -∞ ≠ +∞
Theorem	mnfxr 8229	Minus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ -∞ ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	rexri 8230	A standard real is an extended real (inference form.) (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	1xr 8231	1 is an extended real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	renfdisj 8232	The reals and the infinities are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (ℝ ∩ {+∞, -∞}) = ∅
Theorem	ltrelxr 8233	'Less than' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ < ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*)
Theorem	ltrel 8234	'Less than' is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ Rel <
Theorem	lerelxr 8235	'Less than or equal' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ≤ ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*)
Theorem	lerel 8236	'Less or equal to' is a relation. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Rel ≤
Theorem	xrlenlt 8237	'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than', for extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	ltxrlt 8238	The standard less-than <ℝ and the extended real less-than < are identical when restricted to the non-extended reals ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵))
4.2.3  Restate the ordering postulates with extended real "less than"
Theorem	axltirr 8239	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltirr 8137 with ordering on the extended reals. New proofs should use ltnr 8249 instead for naming consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴)
Theorem	axltwlin 8240	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltwlin 8138 with ordering on the extended reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → (𝐴 < 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵)))
Theorem	axlttrn 8241	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-lttrn 8139 with ordering on the extended reals. New proofs should use lttr 8246 instead for naming consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶))
Theorem	axltadd 8242	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-ltadd 8141 with ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	axapti 8243	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-apti 8140 with ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	axmulgt0 8244	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-mulgt0 8142 with ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	axsuploc 8245*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. (This restates ax-pre-suploc 8146 with ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
4.2.4  Ordering on reals
Theorem	lttr 8246	Alias for axlttrn 8241, for naming consistency with lttri 8277. New proofs should generally use this instead of ax-pre-lttrn 8139. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶))
Theorem	mulgt0 8247	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐵)) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	lenlt 8248	'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than'. Part of definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	ltnr 8249	'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴)
Theorem	ltso 8250	'Less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.)
⊢ < Or ℝ
Theorem	gtso 8251	'Greater than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by JJ, 11-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ◡ < Or ℝ
Theorem	lttri3 8252	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	letri3 8253	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	ltleletr 8254	Transitive law, weaker form of (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶))
Theorem	letr 8255	Transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶))
Theorem	leid 8256	'Less than or equal to' is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	ltne 8257	'Less than' implies not equal. See also ltap 8806 which is the same but for apartness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	ltnsym 8258	'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	eqlelt 8259	Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltle 8260	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	lelttr 8261	Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶))
Theorem	ltletr 8262	Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶))
Theorem	ltnsym2 8263	'Less than' is antisymmetric and irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	eqle 8264	Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	ltnri 8265	'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴
Theorem	eqlei 8266	Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqlei2 8267	Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	gtneii 8268	'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapii 8807 which is the same for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴
Theorem	ltneii 8269	'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Theorem	lttri3i 8270	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	letri3i 8271	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
Theorem	ltnsymi 8272	'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	lenlti 8273	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	ltlei 8274	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	ltleii 8275	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to' (inference). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵
Theorem	ltnei 8276	'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	lttri 8277	'Less than' is transitive. Theorem I.17 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	lelttri 8278	'Less than or equal to', 'less than' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	ltletri 8279	'Less than', 'less than or equal to' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	letri 8280	'Less than or equal to' is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)
Theorem	le2tri3i 8281	Extended trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2000.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐴))
Theorem	mulgt0i 8282	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	mulgt0ii 8283	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐴    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)
Theorem	ltnrd 8284	'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴)
Theorem	gtned 8285	'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapd 8810 which is the same but for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	ltned 8286	'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	lttri3d 8287	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	letri3d 8288	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	eqleltd 8289	Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵)))
Theorem	lenltd 8290	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	ltled 8291	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	ltnsymd 8292	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	nltled 8293	'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	lensymd 8294	'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	mulgt0d 8295	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	letrd 8296	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)
Theorem	lelttrd 8297	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	lttrd 8298	Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	0lt1 8299	0 is less than 1. Theorem I.21 of [Apostol] p. 20. Part of definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 0 < 1
Theorem	ltntri 8300	Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no, as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))