P. 83 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8201-8300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	opelreal 8201	Ordered pair membership in class of real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ ∈ ℝ ↔ 𝐴 ∈ R)
Theorem	elreal 8202*	Membership in class of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ⟨𝑥, 0R⟩ = 𝐴)
Theorem	elrealeu 8203*	The real number mapping in elreal 8202 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ R ⟨𝑥, 0R⟩ = 𝐴)
Theorem	elreal2 8204	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), 0R⟩))
Theorem	0ncn 8205	The empty set is not a complex number. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. See also cnm 8206 which is a related property. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ ℂ
Theorem	cnm 8206*	A complex number is an inhabited set. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ltrelre 8207	'Less than' is a relation on real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <ℝ ⊆ (ℝ × ℝ)
Theorem	addcnsr 8208	Addition of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ + ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) = ⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)⟩)
Theorem	mulcnsr 8209	Multiplication of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ · ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) = ⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩)
Theorem	eqresr 8210	Equality of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	addresr 8211	Addition of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ + ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩) = ⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐵), 0R⟩)
Theorem	mulresr 8212	Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ · ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩) = ⟨(𝐴 ·R 𝐵), 0R⟩)
Theorem	ltresr 8213	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩ ↔ 𝐴 <R 𝐵)
Theorem	ltresr2 8214	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ (1st ‘𝐴) <R (1st ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	dfcnqs 8215	Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in ℂ from those in R. The trick involves qsid 6878, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that ℂ is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 8192), and allows us to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ℂ = ((R × R) / ◡ E )
Theorem	addcnsrec 8216	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 8215 and mulcnsrec 8217. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩]◡ E + [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩]◡ E ) = [⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)⟩]◡ E )
Theorem	mulcnsrec 8217	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecidg 6877, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 8215. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩]◡ E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩]◡ E ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩]◡ E )
Theorem	addvalex 8218	Existence of a sum. This is dependent on how we define + so once we proceed to real number axioms we will replace it with theorems such as addcl 8311. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	pitonnlem1 8219*	Lemma for pitonn 8222. Two ways to write the number one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨1o, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨1o, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ = 1
Theorem	pitonnlem1p1 8220	Lemma for pitonn 8222. Simplifying an expression involving signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → [⟨(𝐴 +P (1P +P 1P)), (1P +P 1P)⟩] ~R = [⟨(𝐴 +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R )
Theorem	pitonnlem2 8221*	Lemma for pitonn 8222. Two ways to add one to a number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ N → (⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ + 1) = ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨(𝐾 +N 1o), 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨(𝐾 +N 1o), 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	pitonn 8222*	Mapping from N to ℕ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)})
Theorem	pitoregt0 8223*	Embedding from N to ℝ yields a number greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → 0 <ℝ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	pitore 8224*	Embedding from N to ℝ. Similar to pitonn 8222 but separate in the sense that we have not proved nnssre 9318 yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	recnnre 8225*	Embedding the reciprocal of a natural number into ℝ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	peano1nnnn 8226*	One is an element of ℕ. This is a counterpart to 1nn 9325 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8274). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ 1 ∈ 𝑁
Theorem	peano2nnnn 8227*	A successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. This is a counterpart to peano2nn 9326 designed for real number axioms which involve to natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8274). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ 𝑁)
Theorem	ltrennb 8228*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <ℝ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ N ∧ 𝐾 ∈ N) → (𝐽 <N 𝐾 ↔ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩))
Theorem	ltrenn 8229*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <ℝ. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐽 <N 𝐾 → ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐾, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	recidpipr 8230*	Another way of saying that a number times its reciprocal is one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → (⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ ·P ⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩) = 1P)
Theorem	recidpirqlemcalc 8231	Lemma for recidpirq 8232. Rearranging some of the expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ P)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·P 𝐵) = 1P)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝐴 +P 1P) ·P (𝐵 +P 1P)) +P (1P ·P 1P)) +P 1P) = ((((𝐴 +P 1P) ·P 1P) +P (1P ·P (𝐵 +P 1P))) +P (1P +P 1P)))
Theorem	recidpirq 8232*	A real number times its reciprocal is one, where reciprocal is expressed with *Q. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → (⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ · ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = 1)
4.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axcnex 8233	The complex numbers form a set. Use cnex 8310 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	axresscn 8234	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 8278. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	ax1cn 8235	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 8279. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	ax1re 8236	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1re 8280. In the Metamath Proof Explorer, this is not a complex number axiom but is proved from ax-1cn 8279 and the other axioms. It is not known whether we can do so here, but the Metamath Proof Explorer proof (accessed 13-Jan-2020) uses excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	axicn 8237	i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 8281. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Theorem	axaddcl 8238	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 8282 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 8311. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axaddrcl 8239	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 8283 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 8312. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axmulcl 8240	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 8284 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 8313. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axmulrcl 8241	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 8285 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 8314. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axaddf 8242	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 8238. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 8308. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axmulf 8243	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This is the construction-dependent version of ax-mulf 8309 and it should not be referenced outside the construction. We generally prefer to develop our theory using the less specific mulcl 8313. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axaddcom 8244	Addition is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcom 8286 be used later. Instead, use addcom 8471. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on real number trichotomy and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	axmulcom 8245	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 8287 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 8315. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	axaddass 8246	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 8288 be used later. Instead, use addass 8316. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	axmulass 8247	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 8289. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axdistr 8248	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 8290 be used later. Instead, use adddi 8318. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axi2m1 8249	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 8291. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Theorem	ax0lt1 8250	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0lt1 8292. The version of this axiom in the Metamath Proof Explorer reads 1 ≠ 0; here we change it to 0 <ℝ 1. The proof of 0 <ℝ 1 from 1 ≠ 0 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (accessed 12-Jan-2020) relies on real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 <ℝ 1
Theorem	ax1rid 8251	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 8293. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ax0id 8252	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0id 8294. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on excluded middle and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	axrnegex 8253*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 8295. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	axprecex 8254*	Existence of positive reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-precex 8296. In treatments which assume excluded middle, the 0 <ℝ 𝐴 condition is generally replaced by 𝐴 ≠ 0, and it may not be necessary to state that the reciproacal is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
Theorem	axcnre 8255*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 8297. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 8256	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 8298. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐴)
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 8257	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 8299. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 <ℝ 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 8258	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 8300. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	axpre-apti 8259	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 8301. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 8260	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 8302. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 8261	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 8303. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-mulext 8262	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <ℝ). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulext 8304. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) <ℝ (𝐵 · 𝐶) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Theorem	rereceu 8263*	The reciprocal from axprecex 8254 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	recriota 8264*	Two ways to express the reciprocal of a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ N → (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ · 𝑟) = 1) = ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑁, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩)
Theorem	axarch 8265*	Archimedean axiom. The Archimedean property is more naturally stated once we have defined ℕ. Unless we find another way to state it, we'll just use the right hand side of dfnn2 9316 in stating what we mean by "natural number" in the context of this axiom. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-arch 8305. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑛 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}𝐴 <ℝ 𝑛)
Theorem	peano5nnnn 8266*	Peano's inductive postulate. This is a counterpart to peano5nni 9317 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8274). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑁 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nnindnn 8267*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). This is a counterpart to nnind 9330 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8274). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑁 → 𝜏)
Theorem	nntopi 8268*	Mapping from ℕ to N. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑁 → ∃𝑧 ∈ N ⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑧, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑧, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩ = 𝐴)
Theorem	axcaucvglemcl 8269*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8274. Mapping to N and R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ N) → (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩) ∈ R)
Theorem	axcaucvglemf 8270*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8274. Mapping to N and R yields a sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:N⟶R)
Theorem	axcaucvglemval 8271*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8274. Value of sequence when mapping to N and R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ N) → (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝐽, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨(𝐺‘𝐽), 0R⟩)
Theorem	axcaucvglemcau 8272*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8274. The result of mapping to N and R satisfies the Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐺‘𝑛) <R ((𝐺‘𝑘) +R [⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R ) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑘) <R ((𝐺‘𝑛) +R [⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )}, {𝑢 ∣ (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q ) <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R ))))
Theorem	axcaucvglemres 8273*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8274. Mapping the limit from N and R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ N ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ R (𝐹‘⟨[⟨(⟨{𝑙 ∣ 𝑙 <Q [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q }, {𝑢 ∣ [⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q <Q 𝑢}⟩ +P 1P), 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑗 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑥)))))
Theorem	axcaucvg 8274*	Real number completeness axiom. A Cauchy sequence with a modulus of convergence converges. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / 𝑛 of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). Because we are stating this axiom before we have introduced notations for ℕ or division, we use 𝑁 for the natural numbers and express a reciprocal in terms of ℩. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-caucvg 8306. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑁⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑛 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑛) + (℩𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 · 𝑟) = 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑗 <ℝ 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑘) <ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 <ℝ ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑥)))))
Theorem	axpre-suploclemres 8275*	Lemma for axpre-suploc 8276. The result. The proof just needs to define 𝐵 as basically the same set as 𝐴 (but expressed as a subset of R rather than a subset of ℝ), and apply suplocsr 8183. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑤 ∈ R ∣ ⟨𝑤, 0R⟩ ∈ 𝐴}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Theorem	axpre-suploc 8276*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given 𝑥 < 𝑦, either there is an element of the set greater than 𝑥, or 𝑦 is an upper bound. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-suploc 8307. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
4.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 8277	The complex numbers form a set. Proofs should normally use cnex 8310 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Axiom	ax-resscn 8278	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 8234. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Axiom	ax-1cn 8279	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 8235. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-1re 8280	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1re 8236. Proofs should use 1re 8332 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
Axiom	ax-icn 8281	i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 8237. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-addcl 8282	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 8238. Proofs should normally use addcl 8311 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-addrcl 8283	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 8239. Proofs should normally use readdcl 8312 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-mulcl 8284	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 8240. Proofs should normally use mulcl 8313 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 8285	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 8241. Proofs should normally use remulcl 8314 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-addcom 8286	Addition is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcom 8244. Proofs should normally use addcom 8471 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Axiom	ax-mulcom 8287	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 8245. Proofs should normally use mulcom 8315 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Axiom	ax-addass 8288	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 8246. Proofs should normally use addass 8316 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-mulass 8289	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 8247. Proofs should normally use mulass 8317 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-distr 8290	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 8248. Proofs should normally use adddi 8318 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-i2m1 8291	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 8249. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Axiom	ax-0lt1 8292	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0lt1 8250. Proofs should normally use 0lt1 8461 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 0 <ℝ 1
Axiom	ax-1rid 8293	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 8251. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-0id 8294	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0id 8252. Proofs should normally use addrid 8472 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-rnegex 8295*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 8253. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Axiom	ax-precex 8296*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axprecex 8254. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
Axiom	ax-cnre 8297*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 8255. For naming consistency, use cnre 8329 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Axiom	ax-pre-ltirr 8298	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax-pre-ltirr 8298. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-pre-ltwlin 8299	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltwlin 8257. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 <ℝ 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 8300	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 8258. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))