Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8201-8300 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Definition | df-xr 8201 |
Define the set of extended reals that includes plus and minus infinity.
Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173.
(Contributed by NM,
13-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ℝ* = (ℝ ∪
{+∞, -∞}) |
| |
| Definition | df-ltxr 8202* |
Define 'less than' on the set of extended reals. Definition 12-3.1 of
[Gleason] p. 173. Note that in our
postulates for complex numbers,
<ℝ is primitive and not
necessarily a relation on ℝ.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ < = ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦)} ∪ (((ℝ ∪ {-∞})
× {+∞}) ∪ ({-∞} × ℝ))) |
| |
| Definition | df-le 8203 |
Define 'less than or equal to' on the extended real subset of complex
numbers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ≤ = ((ℝ* ×
ℝ*) ∖ ◡ <
) |
| |
| Theorem | pnfnre 8204 |
Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ +∞ ∉ ℝ |
| |
| Theorem | mnfnre 8205 |
Minus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ -∞ ∉ ℝ |
| |
| Theorem | ressxr 8206 |
The standard reals are a subset of the extended reals. (Contributed by
NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ℝ ⊆
ℝ* |
| |
| Theorem | rexpssxrxp 8207 |
The Cartesian product of standard reals are a subset of the Cartesian
product of extended reals (common case). (Contributed by David A.
Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ⊆
(ℝ* × ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | rexr 8208 |
A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈
ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | 0xr 8209 |
Zero is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
15-Jun-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 0 ∈
ℝ* |
| |
| Theorem | renepnf 8210 |
No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ +∞) |
| |
| Theorem | renemnf 8211 |
No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ -∞) |
| |
| Theorem | rexrd 8212 |
A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
28-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈
ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | renepnfd 8213 |
No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
28-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ +∞) |
| |
| Theorem | renemnfd 8214 |
No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
28-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ -∞) |
| |
| Theorem | pnfxr 8215 |
Plus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM,
13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ +∞ ∈
ℝ* |
| |
| Theorem | pnfex 8216 |
Plus infinity exists (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler,
8-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ +∞ ∈ V |
| |
| Theorem | pnfnemnf 8217 |
Plus and minus infinity are different elements of ℝ*. (Contributed
by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞ |
| |
| Theorem | mnfnepnf 8218 |
Minus and plus infinity are different (common case). (Contributed by
David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ -∞ ≠ +∞ |
| |
| Theorem | mnfxr 8219 |
Minus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM,
13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
| ⊢ -∞ ∈
ℝ* |
| |
| Theorem | rexri 8220 |
A standard real is an extended real (inference form.) (Contributed by
David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
ℝ* |
| |
| Theorem | 1xr 8221 |
1 is an extended real number. (Contributed by Glauco
Siliprandi,
2-Jan-2022.)
|
| ⊢ 1 ∈
ℝ* |
| |
| Theorem | renfdisj 8222 |
The reals and the infinities are disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (ℝ ∩ {+∞, -∞}) =
∅ |
| |
| Theorem | ltrelxr 8223 |
'Less than' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ < ⊆ (ℝ* ×
ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | ltrel 8224 |
'Less than' is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ Rel < |
| |
| Theorem | lerelxr 8225 |
'Less than or equal' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ≤ ⊆ (ℝ* ×
ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | lerel 8226 |
'Less or equal to' is a relation. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ≤ |
| |
| Theorem | xrlenlt 8227 |
'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than', for extended
reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | ltxrlt 8228 |
The standard less-than <ℝ and the
extended real less-than < are
identical when restricted to the non-extended reals ℝ.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵)) |
| |
| 4.2.3 Restate the ordering postulates with
extended real "less than"
|
| |
| Theorem | axltirr 8229 |
Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers,
derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltirr 8127 with ordering on
the extended reals. New proofs should use ltnr 8239
instead for naming
consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-Jan-2020.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | axltwlin 8230 |
Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex
numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltwlin 8128 with
ordering on the extended reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-Jan-2020.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → (𝐴 < 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | axlttrn 8231 |
Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers,
derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-lttrn 8129 with ordering on
the extended reals. New proofs should use lttr 8236
instead for naming
consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM,
13-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | axltadd 8232 |
Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex
numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-ltadd 8131 with
ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | axapti 8233 |
Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived
from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-apti 8130 with ordering on the
extended reals.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | axmulgt0 8234 |
The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex
numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-mulgt0 8132 with
ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | axsuploc 8235* |
An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Axiom
for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. (This
restates ax-pre-suploc 8136 with ordering on the extended reals.)
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2024.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))) |
| |
| 4.2.4 Ordering on reals
|
| |
| Theorem | lttr 8236 |
Alias for axlttrn 8231, for naming consistency with lttri 8267. New proofs
should generally use this instead of ax-pre-lttrn 8129. (Contributed by NM,
10-Mar-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | mulgt0 8237 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM,
10-Mar-2008.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐵)) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | lenlt 8238 |
'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than'. Part of
definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p.
(varies). (Contributed by NM,
13-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | ltnr 8239 |
'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ltso 8240 |
'Less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.)
|
| ⊢ < Or ℝ |
| |
| Theorem | gtso 8241 |
'Greater than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by JJ, 11-Oct-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ◡
< Or ℝ |
| |
| Theorem | lttri3 8242 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | letri3 8243 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | ltleletr 8244 |
Transitive law, weaker form of (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶.
(Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | letr 8245 |
Transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | leid 8246 |
'Less than or equal to' is reflexive. (Contributed by NM,
18-Aug-1999.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ltne 8247 |
'Less than' implies not equal. See also ltap 8796
which is the same but for
apartness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
16-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ltnsym 8248 |
'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | eqlelt 8249 |
Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed
by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | ltle 8250 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
25-Aug-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | lelttr 8251 |
Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies).
(Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | ltletr 8252 |
Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies).
(Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | ltnsym2 8253 |
'Less than' is antisymmetric and irreflexive. (Contributed by NM,
13-Aug-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | eqle 8254 |
Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
4-Apr-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ltnri 8255 |
'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | eqlei 8256 |
Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
23-May-1999.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | eqlei2 8257 |
Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Alexander van
der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | gtneii 8258 |
'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapii 8797 which is the same
for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | ltneii 8259 |
'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
16-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | lttri3i 8260 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | letri3i 8261 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | ltnsymi 8262 |
'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | lenlti 8263 |
'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM,
24-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ltlei 8264 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ltleii 8265 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to' (inference). (Contributed
by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | ltnei 8266 |
'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | lttri 8267 |
'Less than' is transitive. Theorem I.17 of [Apostol] p. 20.
(Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | lelttri 8268 |
'Less than or equal to', 'less than' transitive law. (Contributed by
NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | ltletri 8269 |
'Less than', 'less than or equal to' transitive law. (Contributed by
NM, 14-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | letri 8270 |
'Less than or equal to' is transitive. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | le2tri3i 8271 |
Extended trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
NM, 14-Aug-2000.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | mulgt0i 8272 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM,
16-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | mulgt0ii 8273 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM,
18-May-1999.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐴 & ⊢ 0 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ltnrd 8274 |
'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | gtned 8275 |
'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapd 8800 which is the same but
for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ltned 8276 |
'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | lttri3d 8277 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | letri3d 8278 |
Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | eqleltd 8279 |
Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed
by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | lenltd 8280 |
'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | ltled 8281 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ltnsymd 8282 |
'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | nltled 8283 |
'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | lensymd 8284 |
'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by
Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | mulgt0d 8285 |
The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | letrd 8286 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by
NM, 20-May-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | lelttrd 8287 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'.
(Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | lttrd 8288 |
Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM,
9-Jan-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | 0lt1 8289 |
0 is less than 1. Theorem I.21 of [Apostol] p.
20. Part of definition
11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies).
(Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|
| ⊢ 0 < 1 |
| |
| Theorem | ltntri 8290 |
Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we
cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does
that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that
is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no,
as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being
unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) |
| |
| 4.2.5 Initial properties of the complex
numbers
|
| |
| Theorem | mul12 8291 |
Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM,
30-Apr-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | mul32 8292 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | mul31 8293 |
Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton,
3-Jan-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | mul4 8294 |
Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) |
| |
| Theorem | muladd11 8295 |
A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵)))) |
| |
| Theorem | 1p1times 8296 |
Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) ·
𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | peano2cn 8297 |
A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate
peano2 4688. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ) |
| |
| Theorem | peano2re 8298 |
A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4688.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ) |
| |
| Theorem | addcom 8299 |
Addition commutes. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | addrid 8300 |
0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon,
16-Jan-2020.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) |