P. 121 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 12001-12100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cvgratnnlemnexp 12001*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12008. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐹‘1)) · (𝐴↑(𝑁 − 1))))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemmn 12002*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12008. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐹‘𝑀)) · (𝐴↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemseq 12003*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12008. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) − (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝑀)) = Σ𝑖 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)(𝐹‘𝑖))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemabsle 12004*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12008. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘Σ𝑖 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)(𝐹‘𝑖)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐹‘𝑀)) · Σ𝑖 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)(𝐴↑(𝑖 − 𝑀))))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemsumlt 12005*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12008. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑖 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)(𝐴↑(𝑖 − 𝑀)) < (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemfm 12006*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12008. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑀)) < ((((1 / ((1 / 𝐴) − 1)) / 𝐴) · ((abs‘(𝐹‘1)) + 1)) / 𝑀))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemrate 12007*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12008. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) − (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝑀))) < (((((1 / ((1 / 𝐴) − 1)) / 𝐴) · ((abs‘(𝐹‘1)) + 1)) · (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴))) / 𝑀))
Theorem	cvgratnn 12008*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝐴 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 is less than 1 for all terms, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number. Although this theorem is similar to cvgratz 12009 and cvgratgt0 12010, the decision to index starting at one is not merely cosmetic, as proving convergence using climcvg1n 11827 is sensitive to how a sequence is indexed. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	cvgratz 12009*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝐴 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 is less than 1 for all terms, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	cvgratgt0 12010*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝐴 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 is less than 1 for all terms beyond some index 𝐵, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
4.9.9  Mertens' theorem
Theorem	mertenslemub 12011*	Lemma for mertensabs 12014. An upper bound for 𝑇. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑆 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ Σ𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑆 − 1))(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)))
Theorem	mertenslemi1 12012*	Lemma for mertensabs 12014. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 2-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑠 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑠 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑠)(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)) < ((𝐸 / 2) / (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐾‘𝑗) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑡)(𝐾‘𝑚) < (((𝐸 / 2) / 𝑠) / (𝑃 + 1)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑇 𝑤 ≤ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(abs‘Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘((𝑚 − 𝑗) + 1))𝐵)) < 𝐸)
Theorem	mertenslem2 12013*	Lemma for mertensabs 12014. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑠 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑠 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑠)(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)) < ((𝐸 / 2) / (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐾‘𝑗) + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(abs‘Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘((𝑚 − 𝑗) + 1))𝐵)) < 𝐸)
Theorem	mertensabs 12014*	Mertens' theorem. If 𝐴(𝑗) is an absolutely convergent series and 𝐵(𝑘) is convergent, then (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0𝐴(𝑗) · Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0𝐵(𝑘)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴(𝑗) · 𝐵(𝑘 − 𝑗)) (and this latter series is convergent). This latter sum is commonly known as the Cauchy product of the sequences. The proof follows the outline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_product#Proof_of_Mertens.27_theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐻) ⇝ (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝐵))
4.9.10  Finite and infinite products
4.9.10.1  Product sequences
Theorem	prodf 12015*	An infinite product of complex terms is a function from an upper set of integers to ℂ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹):𝑍⟶ℂ)
Theorem	clim2prod 12016*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment added. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) · 𝐴))
Theorem	clim2divap 12017*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment removed. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prod3fmul 12018*	The product of two infinite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) · (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prodf1 12019	The value of the partial products in a one-valued infinite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 → (seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1}))‘𝑁) = 1)
Theorem	prodf1f 12020	A one-valued infinite product is equal to the constant one function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1})) = (𝑍 × {1}))
Theorem	prodfclim1 12021	The constant one product converges to one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1})) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	prodfap0 12022*	The product of finitely many terms apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) # 0)
Theorem	prodfrecap 12023*	The reciprocal of a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) # 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (1 / (𝐹‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁) = (1 / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prodfdivap 12024*	The quotient of two products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) # 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) / (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁)))
4.9.10.2  Non-trivial convergence
Theorem	ntrivcvgap 12025*	A non-trivially converging infinite product converges. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	ntrivcvgap0 12026*	A product that converges to a value apart from zero converges non-trivially. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦))
4.9.10.3  Complex products
Syntax	cprod 12027	Extend class notation to include complex products.
class ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Definition	df-proddc 12028*	Define the product of a series with an index set of integers 𝐴. This definition takes most of the aspects of df-sumdc 11831 and adapts them for multiplication instead of addition. However, we insist that in the infinite case, there is a nonzero tail of the sequence. This ensures that the convergence criteria match those of infinite sums. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2024.)
⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑦) ∧ seq𝑚( · , (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑥)) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ≤ 𝑚, ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1)))‘𝑚))))
Theorem	prodeq1f 12029	Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq1 12030*	Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	nfcprod1 12031*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	nfcprod 12032*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product: if 𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝐴 and 𝐵, it is not free in ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	prodeq2w 12033*	Equality theorem for product, when the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 are equal everywhere. Proved using only Extensionality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq2 12034*	Equality theorem for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	cbvprod 12035*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	cbvprodv 12036*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	cbvprodi 12037*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	prodeq1i 12038*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶
Theorem	prodeq2i 12039*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	prodeq12i 12040*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷
Theorem	prodeq1d 12041*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq2d 12042*	Equality deduction for product. Note that unlike prodeq2dv 12043, 𝑘 may occur in 𝜑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq2dv 12043*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq2sdv 12044*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	2cprodeq2dv 12045*	Equality deduction for double product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	prodeq12dv 12046*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	prodeq12rdv 12047*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	prodrbdclem 12048*	Lemma for prodrbdc 12051. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = seq𝑁( · , 𝐹))
Theorem	fproddccvg 12049*	The sequence of partial products of a finite product converges to the whole product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁))
Theorem	prodrbdclem2 12050*	Lemma for prodrbdc 12051. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶 ↔ seq𝑁( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶))
Theorem	prodrbdc 12051*	Rebase the starting point of a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶 ↔ seq𝑁( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶))
Theorem	prodmodclem3 12052*	Lemma for prodmodc 12055. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝐾‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑓:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑀) = (seq1( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁))
Theorem	prodmodclem2a 12053*	Lemma for prodmodc 12055. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝐾‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 Isom < , < ((1...(♯‘𝐴)), 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁))
Theorem	prodmodclem2 12054*	Lemma for prodmodc 12055. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦) ∧ seq𝑚( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑥))) → (∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑚)) → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
Theorem	prodmodc 12055*	A product has at most one limit. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Modified by Jim Kingdon, 14-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦) ∧ seq𝑚( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑥)) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑚))))
Theorem	zproddc 12056*	Series product with index set a subset of the upper integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ( ⇝ ‘seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)))
Theorem	iprodap 12057*	Series product with an upper integer index set (i.e. an infinite product.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵 = ( ⇝ ‘seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)))
Theorem	zprodap0 12058*	Nonzero series product with index set a subset of the upper integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 # 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝑋)
Theorem	iprodap0 12059*	Nonzero series product with an upper integer index set (i.e. an infinite product.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 # 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵 = 𝑋)
4.9.10.4  Finite products
Theorem	fprodseq 12060*	The value of a product over a nonempty finite set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝑘 = (𝐹‘𝑛) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ≤ 𝑀, (𝐺‘𝑛), 1)))‘𝑀))
Theorem	fprodntrivap 12061*	A non-triviality lemma for finite sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑦))
Theorem	prod0 12062	A product over the empty set is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 = 1
Theorem	prod1dc 12063*	Any product of one over a valid set is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 5-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∨ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 1 = 1)
Theorem	prodfct 12064*	A lemma to facilitate conversions from the function form to the class-variable form of a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)‘𝑗) = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	fprodf1o 12065*	Re-index a finite product using a bijection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐺 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑛 ∈ 𝐶 𝐷)
Theorem	prodssdc 12066*	Change the index set to a subset in an upper integer product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐵, 𝐶, 1))) ⇝ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	fprodssdc 12067*	Change the index set to a subset in a finite sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	fprodmul 12068*	The product of two finite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 · 𝐶) = (∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 · ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶))
Theorem	prodsnf 12069*	A product of a singleton is the term. A version of prodsn 12070 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∏𝑘 ∈ {𝑀}𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	prodsn 12070*	A product of a singleton is the term. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∏𝑘 ∈ {𝑀}𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	fprod1 12071*	A finite product of only one term is the term itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑀)𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	climprod1 12072	The limit of a product over one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1})) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	fprodsplitdc 12073*	Split a finite product into two parts. New proofs should use fprodsplit 12074 which is the same but with one fewer hypothesis. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑈 DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝑈 𝐶 = (∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 · ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶))
Theorem	fprodsplit 12074*	Split a finite product into two parts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝑈 𝐶 = (∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 · ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶))
Theorem	fprodm1 12075*	Separate out the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑁 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = (∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 − 1))𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	fprod1p 12076*	Separate out the first term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = (𝐵 · ∏𝑘 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)𝐴))
Theorem	fprodp1 12077*	Multiply in the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑁 + 1) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))𝐴 = (∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	fprodm1s 12078*	Separate out the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = (∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 − 1))𝐴 · ⦋𝑁 / 𝑘⦌𝐴))
Theorem	fprodp1s 12079*	Multiply in the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))𝐴 = (∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 · ⦋(𝑁 + 1) / 𝑘⦌𝐴))
Theorem	prodsns 12080*	A product of the singleton is the term. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⦋𝑀 / 𝑘⦌𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → ∏𝑘 ∈ {𝑀}𝐴 = ⦋𝑀 / 𝑘⦌𝐴)
Theorem	fprodunsn 12081*	Multiply in an additional term in a finite product. See also fprodsplitsn 12110 which is the same but with a Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 hypothesis in place of the distinct variable condition between 𝜑 and 𝑘. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})𝐶 = (∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 · 𝐷))
Theorem	fprodcl2lem 12082*	Finite product closure lemma. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 17-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	fprodcllem 12083*	Finite product closure lemma. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	fprodcl 12084*	Closure of a finite product of complex numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	fprodrecl 12085*	Closure of a finite product of real numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	fprodzcl 12086*	Closure of a finite product of integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	fprodnncl 12087*	Closure of a finite product of positive integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	fprodrpcl 12088*	Closure of a finite product of positive reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	fprodnn0cl 12089*	Closure of a finite product of nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	fprodcllemf 12090*	Finite product closure lemma. A version of fprodcllem 12083 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	fprodreclf 12091*	Closure of a finite product of real numbers. A version of fprodrecl 12085 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	fprodfac 12092*	Factorial using product notation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → (!‘𝐴) = ∏𝑘 ∈ (1...𝐴)𝑘)
Theorem	fprodabs 12093*	The absolute value of a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴) = ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)(abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	fprodeq0 12094*	Any finite product containing a zero term is itself zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 = 𝑁) → 𝐴 = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝐾)𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	fprodshft 12095*	Shift the index of a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 − 𝐾) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = ∏𝑘 ∈ ((𝑀 + 𝐾)...(𝑁 + 𝐾))𝐵)
Theorem	fprodrev 12096*	Reversal of a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝐾 − 𝑘) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = ∏𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 − 𝑁)...(𝐾 − 𝑀))𝐵)
Theorem	fprodconst 12097*	The product of constant terms (𝑘 is not free in 𝐵). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jan-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (𝐵↑(♯‘𝐴)))
Theorem	fprodap0 12098*	A finite product of nonzero terms is nonzero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 # 0)
Theorem	fprod2dlemstep 12099*	Lemma for fprod2d 12100- induction step. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑗, 𝑘⟩ → 𝐷 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∪ {𝑦}) ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝑥 ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∏𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑗} × 𝐵)𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∏𝑗 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ {𝑦})∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∏𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑗 ∈ (𝑥 ∪ {𝑦})({𝑗} × 𝐵)𝐷)
Theorem	fprod2d 12100*	Write a double product as a product over a two-dimensional region. Compare fsum2d 11912. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑗, 𝑘⟩ → 𝐷 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∏𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑗} × 𝐵)𝐷)