Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 12001-12100 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | maxle1 12001 |
The maximum of two reals is no smaller than the first real. Lemma 3.10 of
[Geuvers], p. 10. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 21-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 ≤ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | maxle2 12002 |
The maximum of two reals is no smaller than the second real. Lemma 3.10
of [Geuvers], p. 10. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 21-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐵 ≤ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | maxleast 12003 |
The maximum of two reals is a least upper bound. Lemma 3.11 of
[Geuvers], p. 10. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 22-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | maxleastb 12004 |
Two ways of saying the maximum of two numbers is less than or equal to a
third. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | maxleastlt 12005 |
The maximum as a least upper bound, in terms of less than. (Contributed
by Jim Kingdon, 9-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 < sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ))) → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | maxleb 12006 |
Equivalence of ≤ and being equal to the maximum of
two reals. Lemma
3.12 of [Geuvers], p. 10. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | dfabsmax 12007 |
Absolute value of a real number in terms of maximum. Definition 3.13 of
[Geuvers], p. 11. (Contributed by BJ and
Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (abs‘𝐴) = sup({𝐴, -𝐴}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | maxltsup 12008 |
Two ways of saying the maximum of two numbers is less than a third.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | max0addsup 12009 |
The sum of the positive and negative part functions is the absolute value
function over the reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (sup({𝐴, 0}, ℝ, < ) + sup({
-𝐴, 0}, ℝ, < )) =
(abs‘𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | rexanre 12010* |
Combine two different upper real properties into one. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → (∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → 𝜓)))) |
| |
| Theorem | rexico 12011* |
Restrict the base of an upper real quantifier to an upper real set.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (∃𝑗 ∈ (𝐵[,)+∞)∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | maxclpr 12012 |
The maximum of two real numbers is one of those numbers if and only if
dichotomy (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) holds. For example, this can be
combined with zletric 9700 if one is dealing with integers, but real
number
dichotomy in general does not follow from our axioms. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 1-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | rpmaxcl 12013 |
The maximum of two positive real numbers is a positive real number.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Nov-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)
→ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℝ+) |
| |
| Theorem | zmaxcl 12014 |
The maximum of two integers is an integer. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
27-Sep-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℤ) |
| |
| Theorem | nn0maxcl 12015 |
The maximum of two nonnegative integers is a nonnegative integer.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2025.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)
→ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℕ0) |
| |
| Theorem | 2zsupmax 12016 |
Two ways to express the maximum of two integers. Because order of
integers is decidable, we have more flexibility than for real numbers.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = if(𝐴 ≤ 𝐵, 𝐵, 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | fimaxre2 12017* |
A nonempty finite set of real numbers has an upper bound. (Contributed
by Jeff Madsen, 27-May-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
13-Feb-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | negfi 12018* |
The negation of a finite set of real numbers is finite. (Contributed by
AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → {𝑛 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑛 ∈ 𝐴} ∈ Fin) |
| |
| Theorem | fiidxsupcl 12019* |
A set of integers indexed by a finite set has an upper bound.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2026.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑥) |
| |
| 4.8.6 The minimum of two real
numbers
|
| |
| Theorem | mincom 12020 |
The minimum of two reals is commutative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
8-Feb-2021.)
|
| ⊢ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝐵, 𝐴}, ℝ, < ) |
| |
| Theorem | minmax 12021 |
Minimum expressed in terms of maximum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
8-Feb-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = -sup({ -𝐴, -𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | mincl 12022 |
The minumum of two real numbers is a real number. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 25-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℝ) |
| |
| Theorem | min1inf 12023 |
The minimum of two numbers is less than or equal to the first.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | min2inf 12024 |
The minimum of two numbers is less than or equal to the second.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Feb-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | lemininf 12025 |
Two ways of saying a number is less than or equal to the minimum of two
others. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ, < ) ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | ltmininf 12026 |
Two ways of saying a number is less than the minimum of two others.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ, < ) ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | minabs 12027 |
The minimum of two real numbers in terms of absolute value. (Contributed
by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = (((𝐴 + 𝐵) − (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))) / 2)) |
| |
| Theorem | minclpr 12028 |
The minimum of two real numbers is one of those numbers if and only if
dichotomy (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) holds. For example, this can be
combined with zletric 9700 if one is dealing with integers, but real
number
dichotomy in general does not follow from our axioms. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 23-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | rpmincl 12029 |
The minumum of two positive real numbers is a positive real number.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℝ+) |
| |
| Theorem | zmincl 12030 |
The minumum of two integers is an integer. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
27-Aug-2026.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℤ) |
| |
| Theorem | bdtrilem 12031 |
Lemma for bdtri 12032. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen and Jim
Kingdon,
17-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) →
((abs‘(𝐴 −
𝐶)) + (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))) ≤ (𝐶 + (abs‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶)))) |
| |
| Theorem | bdtri 12032 |
Triangle inequality for bounded values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) →
inf({(𝐴 + 𝐵), 𝐶}, ℝ, < ) ≤ (inf({𝐴, 𝐶}, ℝ, < ) + inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ, < ))) |
| |
| Theorem | mul0inf 12033 |
Equality of a product with zero. A bit of a curiosity, in the sense that
theorems like abs00ap 11851 and mulap0bd 8994 may better express the ideas behind
it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) = 0 ↔ inf({(abs‘𝐴), (abs‘𝐵)}, ℝ, < ) = 0)) |
| |
| Theorem | mingeb 12034 |
Equivalence of ≤ and being equal to the minimum of
two reals.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Oct-2024.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | 2zinfmin 12035 |
Two ways to express the minimum of two integers. Because order of
integers is decidable, we have more flexibility than for real numbers.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Oct-2024.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = if(𝐴 ≤ 𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)) |
| |
| 4.8.7 The maximum of two extended
reals
|
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxleim 12036 |
Value of maximum when we know which extended real is larger.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemcl 12037 |
Lemma for xrmaxif 12043. Closure. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
29-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ if(𝐵 = +∞,
+∞, if(𝐵 = -∞,
𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ))))) ∈
ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxifle 12038 |
An upper bound for {𝐴, 𝐵} in the extended reals.
(Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ 𝐴 ≤ if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )))))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemab 12039 |
Lemma for xrmaxif 12043. A variation of xrmaxleim 12036- that is, if we know
which of two real numbers is larger, we know the maximum of the two.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ))))) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemlub 12040 |
Lemma for xrmaxif 12043. A least upper bound for {𝐴, 𝐵}.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 < if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, <
)))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemcom 12041 |
Lemma for xrmaxif 12043. Commutativity of an expression which we
will
later show to be the supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
29-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ if(𝐵 = +∞,
+∞, if(𝐵 = -∞,
𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ))))) = if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, sup({𝐵, 𝐴}, ℝ, < )))))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemval 12042* |
Lemma for xrmaxif 12043. Value of the supremum. (Contributed by
Jim
Kingdon, 29-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑀 = if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, <
))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ (𝑀 ∈
ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝑀 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ* (𝑥 < 𝑀 → ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝑥 < 𝑧))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxif 12043 |
Maximum of two extended reals in terms of if
expressions.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
= if(𝐵 = +∞,
+∞, if(𝐵 = -∞,
𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )))))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxcl 12044 |
The maximum of two extended reals is an extended real. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
∈ ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmax1sup 12045 |
An extended real is less than or equal to the maximum of it and another.
(Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
30-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ 𝐴 ≤ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, <
)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmax2sup 12046 |
An extended real is less than or equal to the maximum of it and another.
(Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
30-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ 𝐵 ≤ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, <
)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxrecl 12047 |
The maximum of two real numbers is the same when taken as extended reals
or as reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) = sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxleastlt 12048 |
The maximum as a least upper bound, in terms of less than. (Contributed
by Jim Kingdon, 9-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
∧ (𝐶 ∈
ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 < sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ))) →
(𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrltmaxsup 12049 |
The maximum as a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
10-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (𝐶 < sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) ↔
(𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxltsup 12050 |
Two ways of saying the maximum of two numbers is less than a third.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxlesup 12051 |
Two ways of saying the maximum of two numbers is less than or equal to a
third. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Jim
Kingdon, 10-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxaddlem 12052 |
Lemma for xrmaxadd 12053. The case where 𝐴 is real. (Contributed
by
Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*)
→ sup({(𝐴
+e 𝐵), (𝐴 +e 𝐶)}, ℝ*, < )
= (𝐴 +e
sup({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, <
))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxadd 12053 |
Distributing addition over maximum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
11-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → sup({(𝐴 +e 𝐵), (𝐴 +e 𝐶)}, ℝ*, < ) = (𝐴 +e sup({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, <
))) |
| |
| 4.8.8 The minimum of two extended
reals
|
| |
| Theorem | xrnegiso 12054 |
Negation is an order anti-isomorphism of the extended reals, which is
its own inverse. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ↦
-e𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , ◡ < (ℝ*,
ℝ*) ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | infxrnegsupex 12055* |
The infimum of a set of extended reals 𝐴 is the negative of the
supremum of the negatives of its elements. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
2-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ* (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆
ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) =
-esup({𝑧 ∈
ℝ* ∣ -e𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ*, <
)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrnegcon1d 12056 |
Contraposition law for extended real unary minus. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 2-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈
ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (-e𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ -e𝐵 = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminmax 12057 |
Minimum expressed in terms of maximum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
2-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
= -esup({-e𝐴, -e𝐵}, ℝ*, <
)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmincl 12058 |
The minumum of two extended reals is an extended real. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
∈ ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmin1inf 12059 |
The minimum of two extended reals is less than or equal to the first.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
≤ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmin2inf 12060 |
The minimum of two extended reals is less than or equal to the second.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmineqinf 12061 |
The minimum of two extended reals is equal to the second if the first is
bigger. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Jim
Kingdon, 3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xrltmininf 12062 |
Two ways of saying an extended real is less than the minimum of two
others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (𝐴 < inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < ) ↔
(𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrlemininf 12063 |
Two ways of saying a number is less than or equal to the minimum of two
others. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Jim
Kingdon, 4-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < ) ↔
(𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminltinf 12064 |
Two ways of saying an extended real is greater than the minimum of two
others. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < ) < 𝐴 ↔ (𝐵 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminrecl 12065 |
The minimum of two real numbers is the same when taken as extended reals
or as reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) = inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminrpcl 12066 |
The minimum of two positive reals is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 4-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
∈ ℝ+) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminadd 12067 |
Distributing addition over minimum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
10-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → inf({(𝐴 +e 𝐵), (𝐴 +e 𝐶)}, ℝ*, < ) = (𝐴 +e inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, <
))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrbdtri 12068 |
Triangle inequality for bounded values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 0 ≤
𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) ∧
(𝐶 ∈
ℝ* ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → inf({(𝐴 +e 𝐵), 𝐶}, ℝ*, < ) ≤
(inf({𝐴, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < )
+e inf({𝐵,
𝐶}, ℝ*,
< ))) |
| |
| Theorem | iooinsup 12069 |
Intersection of two open intervals of extended reals. (Contributed by
NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
∧ (𝐶 ∈
ℝ* ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ*)) →
((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∩ (𝐶(,)𝐷)) = (sup({𝐴, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < )(,)inf({𝐵, 𝐷}, ℝ*, <
))) |
| |
| 4.9 Elementary limits and
convergence
|
| |
| 4.9.1 Limits
|
| |
| Syntax | cli 12070 |
Extend class notation with convergence relation for limits.
|
| class ⇝ |
| |
| Definition | df-clim 12071* |
Define the limit relation for complex number sequences. See clim 12073
for
its relational expression. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ⇝ = {〈𝑓, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ
∀𝑘 ∈
(ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝑓‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑘) − 𝑦)) < 𝑥))} |
| |
| Theorem | climrel 12072 |
The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ⇝ |
| |
| Theorem | clim 12073* |
Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is
𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. This
means that for any real
𝑥, no matter how small, there always
exists an integer 𝑗 such
that the absolute difference of any later complex number in the sequence
and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ
∀𝑘 ∈
(ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)))) |
| |
| Theorem | climcl 12074 |
Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by
NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) |
| |
| Theorem | clim2 12075* |
Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is
𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴, with
more general quantifier
restrictions than clim 12073. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2007.) (Revised
by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)))) |
| |
| Theorem | clim2c 12076* |
Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by NM,
24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | clim0 12077* |
Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM,
24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | clim0c 12078* |
Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM,
24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | climi 12079* |
Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM,
11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | climi2 12080* |
Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM,
11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | climi0 12081* |
Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers to zero. (Contributed by
NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | climconst 12082* |
An (eventually) constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed
by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | climconst2 12083 |
A constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by NM,
6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ 𝑍
& ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑍 × {𝐴}) ⇝ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | climz 12084 |
The zero sequence converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-1999.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (ℤ × {0}) ⇝
0 |
| |
| Theorem | climuni 12085 |
An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit.
(Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | fclim 12086 |
The limit relation is function-like, and with codomian the complex
numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ⇝ :dom ⇝
⟶ℂ |
| |
| Theorem | climdm 12087 |
Two ways to express that a function has a limit. (The expression
( ⇝ ‘𝐹) is sometimes useful as a shorthand
for "the unique limit
of the function 𝐹"). (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro,
18-Mar-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ ( ⇝ ‘𝐹)) |
| |
| Theorem | climeu 12088* |
An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit.
(Contributed by NM, 25-Dec-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → ∃!𝑥 𝐹 ⇝ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | climreu 12089* |
An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit.
(Contributed by NM, 25-Dec-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | climmo 12090* |
An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ∃*𝑥 𝐹 ⇝ 𝑥 |
| |
| Theorem | climeq 12091* |
Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same
limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐺‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | climmpt 12092* |
Exhibit a function 𝐺 with the same convergence properties
as the
not-quite-function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ (𝐹‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | 2clim 12093* |
If two sequences converge to each other, they converge to the same
limit. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐺‘𝑘))) < 𝑥)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | climshftlemg 12094 |
A shifted function converges if the original function converges.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → (𝐹 shift 𝑀) ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | climres 12095 |
A function restricted to upper integers converges iff the original
function converges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐹 ↾
(ℤ≥‘𝑀)) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | climshft 12096 |
A shifted function converges iff the original function converges.
(Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐹 shift 𝑀) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | serclim0 12097 |
The zero series converges to zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman,
9-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → seq𝑀( + , ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) × {0})) ⇝
0) |
| |
| Theorem | climshft2 12098* |
A shifted function converges iff the original function converges.
(Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 6-Feb-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑋)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 𝐾)) = (𝐹‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | climabs0 12099* |
Convergence to zero of the absolute value is equivalent to convergence
to zero. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 0)) |
| |
| Theorem | climcn1 12100* |
Image of a limit under a continuous map. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) →
∃𝑦 ∈
ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐴))) < 𝑥))
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐹‘𝐴)) |