Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 11901-12000 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | maxabslemval 11901* |
Lemma for maxabs 11902. Value of the supremum. (Contributed by
Jim
Kingdon, 22-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))) / 2) ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))) / 2) < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))) / 2) → ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝑥 < 𝑧))) |
| |
| Theorem | maxabs 11902 |
Maximum of two real numbers in terms of absolute value. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 20-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))) / 2)) |
| |
| Theorem | maxcl 11903 |
The maximum of two real numbers is a real number. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 22-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℝ) |
| |
| Theorem | maxle1 11904 |
The maximum of two reals is no smaller than the first real. Lemma 3.10 of
[Geuvers], p. 10. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 21-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 ≤ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | maxle2 11905 |
The maximum of two reals is no smaller than the second real. Lemma 3.10
of [Geuvers], p. 10. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 21-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐵 ≤ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | maxleast 11906 |
The maximum of two reals is a least upper bound. Lemma 3.11 of
[Geuvers], p. 10. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 22-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | maxleastb 11907 |
Two ways of saying the maximum of two numbers is less than or equal to a
third. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | maxleastlt 11908 |
The maximum as a least upper bound, in terms of less than. (Contributed
by Jim Kingdon, 9-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 < sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ))) → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | maxleb 11909 |
Equivalence of ≤ and being equal to the maximum of
two reals. Lemma
3.12 of [Geuvers], p. 10. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | dfabsmax 11910 |
Absolute value of a real number in terms of maximum. Definition 3.13 of
[Geuvers], p. 11. (Contributed by BJ and
Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2021.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (abs‘𝐴) = sup({𝐴, -𝐴}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | maxltsup 11911 |
Two ways of saying the maximum of two numbers is less than a third.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | max0addsup 11912 |
The sum of the positive and negative part functions is the absolute value
function over the reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (sup({𝐴, 0}, ℝ, < ) +
sup({-𝐴, 0}, ℝ, <
)) = (abs‘𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | rexanre 11913* |
Combine two different upper real properties into one. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → (∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → 𝜓)))) |
| |
| Theorem | rexico 11914* |
Restrict the base of an upper real quantifier to an upper real set.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (∃𝑗 ∈ (𝐵[,)+∞)∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | maxclpr 11915 |
The maximum of two real numbers is one of those numbers if and only if
dichotomy (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) holds. For example, this can be
combined with zletric 9626 if one is dealing with integers, but real
number
dichotomy in general does not follow from our axioms. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 1-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | rpmaxcl 11916 |
The maximum of two positive real numbers is a positive real number.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Nov-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)
→ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℝ+) |
| |
| Theorem | zmaxcl 11917 |
The maximum of two integers is an integer. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
27-Sep-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℤ) |
| |
| Theorem | nn0maxcl 11918 |
The maximum of two nonnegative integers is a nonnegative integer.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2025.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)
→ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℕ0) |
| |
| Theorem | 2zsupmax 11919 |
Two ways to express the maximum of two integers. Because order of
integers is decidable, we have more flexibility than for real numbers.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = if(𝐴 ≤ 𝐵, 𝐵, 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | fimaxre2 11920* |
A nonempty finite set of real numbers has an upper bound. (Contributed
by Jeff Madsen, 27-May-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
13-Feb-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | negfi 11921* |
The negation of a finite set of real numbers is finite. (Contributed by
AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → {𝑛 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑛 ∈ 𝐴} ∈ Fin) |
| |
| 4.8.6 The minimum of two real
numbers
|
| |
| Theorem | mincom 11922 |
The minimum of two reals is commutative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
8-Feb-2021.)
|
| ⊢ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝐵, 𝐴}, ℝ, < ) |
| |
| Theorem | minmax 11923 |
Minimum expressed in terms of maximum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
8-Feb-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = -sup({-𝐴, -𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | mincl 11924 |
The minumum of two real numbers is a real number. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 25-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℝ) |
| |
| Theorem | min1inf 11925 |
The minimum of two numbers is less than or equal to the first.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | min2inf 11926 |
The minimum of two numbers is less than or equal to the second.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Feb-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | lemininf 11927 |
Two ways of saying a number is less than or equal to the minimum of two
others. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ, < ) ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | ltmininf 11928 |
Two ways of saying a number is less than the minimum of two others.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ, < ) ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | minabs 11929 |
The minimum of two real numbers in terms of absolute value. (Contributed
by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = (((𝐴 + 𝐵) − (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))) / 2)) |
| |
| Theorem | minclpr 11930 |
The minimum of two real numbers is one of those numbers if and only if
dichotomy (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) holds. For example, this can be
combined with zletric 9626 if one is dealing with integers, but real
number
dichotomy in general does not follow from our axioms. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 23-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | rpmincl 11931 |
The minumum of two positive real numbers is a positive real number.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈
ℝ+) |
| |
| Theorem | bdtrilem 11932 |
Lemma for bdtri 11933. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen and Jim
Kingdon,
17-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) →
((abs‘(𝐴 −
𝐶)) + (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))) ≤ (𝐶 + (abs‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶)))) |
| |
| Theorem | bdtri 11933 |
Triangle inequality for bounded values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) →
inf({(𝐴 + 𝐵), 𝐶}, ℝ, < ) ≤ (inf({𝐴, 𝐶}, ℝ, < ) + inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ, < ))) |
| |
| Theorem | mul0inf 11934 |
Equality of a product with zero. A bit of a curiosity, in the sense that
theorems like abs00ap 11755 and mulap0bd 8936 may better express the ideas behind
it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) = 0 ↔ inf({(abs‘𝐴), (abs‘𝐵)}, ℝ, < ) = 0)) |
| |
| Theorem | mingeb 11935 |
Equivalence of ≤ and being equal to the minimum of
two reals.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Oct-2024.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | 2zinfmin 11936 |
Two ways to express the minimum of two integers. Because order of
integers is decidable, we have more flexibility than for real numbers.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Oct-2024.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = if(𝐴 ≤ 𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)) |
| |
| 4.8.7 The maximum of two extended
reals
|
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxleim 11937 |
Value of maximum when we know which extended real is larger.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemcl 11938 |
Lemma for xrmaxif 11944. Closure. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
29-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ if(𝐵 = +∞,
+∞, if(𝐵 = -∞,
𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ))))) ∈
ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxifle 11939 |
An upper bound for {𝐴, 𝐵} in the extended reals.
(Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ 𝐴 ≤ if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )))))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemab 11940 |
Lemma for xrmaxif 11944. A variation of xrmaxleim 11937- that is, if we know
which of two real numbers is larger, we know the maximum of the two.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ))))) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemlub 11941 |
Lemma for xrmaxif 11944. A least upper bound for {𝐴, 𝐵}.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 < if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, <
)))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemcom 11942 |
Lemma for xrmaxif 11944. Commutativity of an expression which we
will
later show to be the supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
29-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ if(𝐵 = +∞,
+∞, if(𝐵 = -∞,
𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ))))) = if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, sup({𝐵, 𝐴}, ℝ, < )))))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxiflemval 11943* |
Lemma for xrmaxif 11944. Value of the supremum. (Contributed by
Jim
Kingdon, 29-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑀 = if(𝐵 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐵 = -∞, 𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, <
))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ (𝑀 ∈
ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝑀 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ* (𝑥 < 𝑀 → ∃𝑧 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝑥 < 𝑧))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxif 11944 |
Maximum of two extended reals in terms of if
expressions.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
= if(𝐵 = +∞,
+∞, if(𝐵 = -∞,
𝐴, if(𝐴 = +∞, +∞, if(𝐴 = -∞, 𝐵, sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )))))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxcl 11945 |
The maximum of two extended reals is an extended real. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
∈ ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmax1sup 11946 |
An extended real is less than or equal to the maximum of it and another.
(Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
30-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ 𝐴 ≤ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, <
)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmax2sup 11947 |
An extended real is less than or equal to the maximum of it and another.
(Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
30-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ 𝐵 ≤ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, <
)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxrecl 11948 |
The maximum of two real numbers is the same when taken as extended reals
or as reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) = sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxleastlt 11949 |
The maximum as a least upper bound, in terms of less than. (Contributed
by Jim Kingdon, 9-Feb-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
∧ (𝐶 ∈
ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 < sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ))) →
(𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrltmaxsup 11950 |
The maximum as a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
10-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (𝐶 < sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) ↔
(𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxltsup 11951 |
Two ways of saying the maximum of two numbers is less than a third.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxlesup 11952 |
Two ways of saying the maximum of two numbers is less than or equal to a
third. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Jim
Kingdon, 10-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxaddlem 11953 |
Lemma for xrmaxadd 11954. The case where 𝐴 is real. (Contributed
by
Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*)
→ sup({(𝐴
+𝑒 𝐵),
(𝐴 +𝑒
𝐶)}, ℝ*,
< ) = (𝐴
+𝑒 sup({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, <
))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmaxadd 11954 |
Distributing addition over maximum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
11-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → sup({(𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵), (𝐴 +𝑒 𝐶)}, ℝ*, < ) = (𝐴 +𝑒
sup({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, <
))) |
| |
| 4.8.8 The minimum of two extended
reals
|
| |
| Theorem | xrnegiso 11955 |
Negation is an order anti-isomorphism of the extended reals, which is
its own inverse. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ↦
-𝑒𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , ◡ < (ℝ*,
ℝ*) ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | infxrnegsupex 11956* |
The infimum of a set of extended reals 𝐴 is the negative of the
supremum of the negatives of its elements. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
2-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ* (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆
ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) =
-𝑒sup({𝑧 ∈ ℝ* ∣
-𝑒𝑧
∈ 𝐴},
ℝ*, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | xrnegcon1d 11957 |
Contraposition law for extended real unary minus. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 2-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈
ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (-𝑒𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ -𝑒𝐵 = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminmax 11958 |
Minimum expressed in terms of maximum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
2-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
= -𝑒sup({-𝑒𝐴, -𝑒𝐵}, ℝ*, <
)) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmincl 11959 |
The minumum of two extended reals is an extended real. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
∈ ℝ*) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmin1inf 11960 |
The minimum of two extended reals is less than or equal to the first.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
≤ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmin2inf 11961 |
The minimum of two extended reals is less than or equal to the second.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
≤ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xrmineqinf 11962 |
The minimum of two extended reals is equal to the second if the first is
bigger. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Jim
Kingdon, 3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xrltmininf 11963 |
Two ways of saying an extended real is less than the minimum of two
others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
3-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (𝐴 < inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < ) ↔
(𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrlemininf 11964 |
Two ways of saying a number is less than or equal to the minimum of two
others. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Jim
Kingdon, 4-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < ) ↔
(𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminltinf 11965 |
Two ways of saying an extended real is greater than the minimum of two
others. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → (inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < ) < 𝐴 ↔ (𝐵 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminrecl 11966 |
The minimum of two real numbers is the same when taken as extended reals
or as reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < ) = inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminrpcl 11967 |
The minimum of two positive reals is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 4-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)
→ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ*, < )
∈ ℝ+) |
| |
| Theorem | xrminadd 11968 |
Distributing addition over minimum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
10-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 𝐶 ∈
ℝ*) → inf({(𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵), (𝐴 +𝑒 𝐶)}, ℝ*, < ) = (𝐴 +𝑒
inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, <
))) |
| |
| Theorem | xrbdtri 11969 |
Triangle inequality for bounded values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 0 ≤
𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ*
∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵) ∧
(𝐶 ∈
ℝ* ∧ 0 < 𝐶)) → inf({(𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵), 𝐶}, ℝ*, < ) ≤
(inf({𝐴, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < )
+𝑒 inf({𝐵, 𝐶}, ℝ*, <
))) |
| |
| Theorem | iooinsup 11970 |
Intersection of two open intervals of extended reals. (Contributed by
NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-May-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)
∧ (𝐶 ∈
ℝ* ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ*)) →
((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∩ (𝐶(,)𝐷)) = (sup({𝐴, 𝐶}, ℝ*, < )(,)inf({𝐵, 𝐷}, ℝ*, <
))) |
| |
| 4.9 Elementary limits and
convergence
|
| |
| 4.9.1 Limits
|
| |
| Syntax | cli 11971 |
Extend class notation with convergence relation for limits.
|
| class ⇝ |
| |
| Definition | df-clim 11972* |
Define the limit relation for complex number sequences. See clim 11974
for
its relational expression. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ⇝ = {〈𝑓, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ
∀𝑘 ∈
(ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝑓‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑘) − 𝑦)) < 𝑥))} |
| |
| Theorem | climrel 11973 |
The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ⇝ |
| |
| Theorem | clim 11974* |
Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is
𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. This
means that for any real
𝑥, no matter how small, there always
exists an integer 𝑗 such
that the absolute difference of any later complex number in the sequence
and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ
∀𝑘 ∈
(ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)))) |
| |
| Theorem | climcl 11975 |
Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by
NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) |
| |
| Theorem | clim2 11976* |
Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is
𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴, with
more general quantifier
restrictions than clim 11974. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2007.) (Revised
by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)))) |
| |
| Theorem | clim2c 11977* |
Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by NM,
24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | clim0 11978* |
Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM,
24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | clim0c 11979* |
Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM,
24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | climi 11980* |
Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM,
11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | climi2 11981* |
Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM,
11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | climi0 11982* |
Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers to zero. (Contributed by
NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | climconst 11983* |
An (eventually) constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed
by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | climconst2 11984 |
A constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by NM,
6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ 𝑍
& ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑍 × {𝐴}) ⇝ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | climz 11985 |
The zero sequence converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-1999.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (ℤ × {0}) ⇝
0 |
| |
| Theorem | climuni 11986 |
An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit.
(Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | fclim 11987 |
The limit relation is function-like, and with codomian the complex
numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ⇝ :dom ⇝
⟶ℂ |
| |
| Theorem | climdm 11988 |
Two ways to express that a function has a limit. (The expression
( ⇝ ‘𝐹) is sometimes useful as a shorthand
for "the unique limit
of the function 𝐹"). (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro,
18-Mar-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ ( ⇝ ‘𝐹)) |
| |
| Theorem | climeu 11989* |
An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit.
(Contributed by NM, 25-Dec-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → ∃!𝑥 𝐹 ⇝ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | climreu 11990* |
An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit.
(Contributed by NM, 25-Dec-2005.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | climmo 11991* |
An infinite sequence of complex numbers converges to at most one limit.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ∃*𝑥 𝐹 ⇝ 𝑥 |
| |
| Theorem | climeq 11992* |
Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same
limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐺‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | climmpt 11993* |
Exhibit a function 𝐺 with the same convergence properties
as the
not-quite-function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ (𝐹‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | 2clim 11994* |
If two sequences converge to each other, they converge to the same
limit. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+
∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐺‘𝑘))) < 𝑥)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | climshftlemg 11995 |
A shifted function converges if the original function converges.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → (𝐹 shift 𝑀) ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | climres 11996 |
A function restricted to upper integers converges iff the original
function converges. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐹 ↾
(ℤ≥‘𝑀)) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | climshft 11997 |
A shifted function converges iff the original function converges.
(Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐹 shift 𝑀) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | serclim0 11998 |
The zero series converges to zero. (Contributed by Paul Chapman,
9-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → seq𝑀( + , ((ℤ≥‘𝑀) × {0})) ⇝
0) |
| |
| Theorem | climshft2 11999* |
A shifted function converges iff the original function converges.
(Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 6-Feb-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑋)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 𝐾)) = (𝐹‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | climabs0 12000* |
Convergence to zero of the absolute value is equivalent to convergence
to zero. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
31-Jan-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 0)) |