P. 122 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 12101-12200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	geoisum 12101*	The infinite sum of 1 + 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2... is (1 / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) < 1) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐴↑𝑘) = (1 / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	geoisumr 12102*	The infinite sum of reciprocals 1 + (1 / 𝐴)↑1 + (1 / 𝐴)↑2... is 𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1). (Contributed by rpenner, 3-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 1 < (abs‘𝐴)) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((1 / 𝐴)↑𝑘) = (𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1)))
Theorem	geoisum1 12103*	The infinite sum of 𝐴↑1 + 𝐴↑2... is (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴)). (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) < 1) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝐴↑𝑘) = (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	geoisum1c 12104*	The infinite sum of 𝐴 · (𝑅↑1) + 𝐴 · (𝑅↑2)... is (𝐴 · 𝑅) / (1 − 𝑅). (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝑅) < 1) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · (𝑅↑𝑘)) = ((𝐴 · 𝑅) / (1 − 𝑅)))
Theorem	0.999... 12105	The recurring decimal 0.999..., which is defined as the infinite sum 0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009 + ... i.e. 9 / 10↑1 + 9 / 10↑2 + 9 / 10↑3 + ..., is exactly equal to 1. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (9 / (;10↑𝑘)) = 1
Theorem	geoihalfsum 12106	Prove that the infinite geometric series of 1/2, 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 1. Uses geoisum1 12103. This is a representation of .111... in binary with an infinite number of 1's. Theorem 0.999... 12105 proves a similar claim for .999... in base 10. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jul-2022.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (1 / (2↑𝑘)) = 1
4.9.8  Ratio test for infinite series convergence
Theorem	cvgratnnlembern 12107	Lemma for cvgratnn 12115. Upper bound for a geometric progression of positive ratio less than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑀) < ((1 / ((1 / 𝐴) − 1)) / 𝑀))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemnexp 12108*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12115. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐹‘1)) · (𝐴↑(𝑁 − 1))))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemmn 12109*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12115. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑁)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐹‘𝑀)) · (𝐴↑(𝑁 − 𝑀))))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemseq 12110*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12115. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) − (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝑀)) = Σ𝑖 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)(𝐹‘𝑖))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemabsle 12111*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12115. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘Σ𝑖 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)(𝐹‘𝑖)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐹‘𝑀)) · Σ𝑖 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)(𝐴↑(𝑖 − 𝑀))))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemsumlt 12112*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12115. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑖 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)(𝐴↑(𝑖 − 𝑀)) < (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemfm 12113*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12115. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑀)) < ((((1 / ((1 / 𝐴) − 1)) / 𝐴) · ((abs‘(𝐹‘1)) + 1)) / 𝑀))
Theorem	cvgratnnlemrate 12114*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12115. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) − (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝑀))) < (((((1 / ((1 / 𝐴) − 1)) / 𝐴) · ((abs‘(𝐹‘1)) + 1)) · (𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴))) / 𝑀))
Theorem	cvgratnn 12115*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝐴 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 is less than 1 for all terms, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number. Although this theorem is similar to cvgratz 12116 and cvgratgt0 12117, the decision to index starting at one is not merely cosmetic, as proving convergence using climcvg1n 11933 is sensitive to how a sequence is indexed. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	cvgratz 12116*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝐴 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 is less than 1 for all terms, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	cvgratgt0 12117*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝐴 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 is less than 1 for all terms beyond some index 𝐵, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ≤ (𝐴 · (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
4.9.9  Mertens' theorem
Theorem	mertenslemub 12118*	Lemma for mertensabs 12121. An upper bound for 𝑇. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑆 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ Σ𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑆 − 1))(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)))
Theorem	mertenslemi1 12119*	Lemma for mertensabs 12121. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 2-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑠 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑠 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑠)(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)) < ((𝐸 / 2) / (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐾‘𝑗) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑡)(𝐾‘𝑚) < (((𝐸 / 2) / 𝑠) / (𝑃 + 1)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑇 𝑤 ≤ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(abs‘Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘((𝑚 − 𝑗) + 1))𝐵)) < 𝐸)
Theorem	mertenslem2 12120*	Lemma for mertensabs 12121. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑠 − 1))𝑧 = (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑠 ∈ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑠)(abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑛 + 1))(𝐺‘𝑘)) < ((𝐸 / 2) / (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐾‘𝑗) + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑚 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(abs‘Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘((𝑚 − 𝑗) + 1))𝐵)) < 𝐸)
Theorem	mertensabs 12121*	Mertens' theorem. If 𝐴(𝑗) is an absolutely convergent series and 𝐵(𝑘) is convergent, then (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0𝐴(𝑗) · Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0𝐵(𝑘)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴(𝑗) · 𝐵(𝑘 − 𝑗)) (and this latter series is convergent). This latter sum is commonly known as the Cauchy product of the sequences. The proof follows the outline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_product#Proof_of_Mertens.27_theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐹‘𝑗) = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐾‘𝑗) = (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑘)(𝐴 · (𝐺‘(𝑘 − 𝑗))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐾) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , 𝐻) ⇝ (Σ𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝐵))
4.9.10  Finite and infinite products
4.9.10.1  Product sequences
Theorem	prodf 12122*	An infinite product of complex terms is a function from an upper set of integers to ℂ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹):𝑍⟶ℂ)
Theorem	clim2prod 12123*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment added. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) · 𝐴))
Theorem	clim2divap 12124*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment removed. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prod3fmul 12125*	The product of two infinite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) · (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prodf1 12126	The value of the partial products in a one-valued infinite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 → (seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1}))‘𝑁) = 1)
Theorem	prodf1f 12127	A one-valued infinite product is equal to the constant one function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1})) = (𝑍 × {1}))
Theorem	prodfclim1 12128	The constant one product converges to one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1})) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	prodfap0 12129*	The product of finitely many terms apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) # 0)
Theorem	prodfrecap 12130*	The reciprocal of a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) # 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (1 / (𝐹‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁) = (1 / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prodfdivap 12131*	The quotient of two products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) # 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) / (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁)))
4.9.10.2  Non-trivial convergence
Theorem	ntrivcvgap 12132*	A non-trivially converging infinite product converges. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	ntrivcvgap0 12133*	A product that converges to a value apart from zero converges non-trivially. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 # 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦))
4.9.10.3  Complex products
Syntax	cprod 12134	Extend class notation to include complex products.
class ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Definition	df-proddc 12135*	Define the product of a series with an index set of integers 𝐴. This definition takes most of the aspects of df-sumdc 11937 and adapts them for multiplication instead of addition. However, we insist that in the infinite case, there is a nonzero tail of the sequence. This ensures that the convergence criteria match those of infinite sums. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2024.)
⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑦) ∧ seq𝑚( · , (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑥)) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ≤ 𝑚, ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1)))‘𝑚))))
Theorem	prodeq1f 12136	Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq1 12137*	Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	nfcprod1 12138*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	nfcprod 12139*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product: if 𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝐴 and 𝐵, it is not free in ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	prodeq2w 12140*	Equality theorem for product, when the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 are equal everywhere. Proved using only Extensionality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq2 12141*	Equality theorem for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	cbvprod 12142*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	cbvprodv 12143*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	cbvprodi 12144*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	prodeq1i 12145*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶
Theorem	prodeq2i 12146*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	prodeq12i 12147*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷
Theorem	prodeq1d 12148*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq2d 12149*	Equality deduction for product. Note that unlike prodeq2dv 12150, 𝑘 may occur in 𝜑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq2dv 12150*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	prodeq2sdv 12151*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	2cprodeq2dv 12152*	Equality deduction for double product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	prodeq12dv 12153*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	prodeq12rdv 12154*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	prodrbdclem 12155*	Lemma for prodrbdc 12158. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = seq𝑁( · , 𝐹))
Theorem	fproddccvg 12156*	The sequence of partial products of a finite product converges to the whole product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁))
Theorem	prodrbdclem2 12157*	Lemma for prodrbdc 12158. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶 ↔ seq𝑁( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶))
Theorem	prodrbdc 12158*	Rebase the starting point of a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶 ↔ seq𝑁( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶))
Theorem	prodmodclem3 12159*	Lemma for prodmodc 12162. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝐾‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑓:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑀) = (seq1( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁))
Theorem	prodmodclem2a 12160*	Lemma for prodmodc 12162. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝐾‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 Isom < , < ((1...(♯‘𝐴)), 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁))
Theorem	prodmodclem2 12161*	Lemma for prodmodc 12162. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦) ∧ seq𝑚( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑥))) → (∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑚)) → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
Theorem	prodmodc 12162*	A product has at most one limit. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Modified by Jim Kingdon, 14-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦) ∧ seq𝑚( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑥)) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑚))))
Theorem	zproddc 12163*	Series product with index set a subset of the upper integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ( ⇝ ‘seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)))
Theorem	iprodap 12164*	Series product with an upper integer index set (i.e. an infinite product.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵 = ( ⇝ ‘seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)))
Theorem	zprodap0 12165*	Nonzero series product with index set a subset of the upper integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 # 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝑋)
Theorem	iprodap0 12166*	Nonzero series product with an upper integer index set (i.e. an infinite product.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 # 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵 = 𝑋)
4.9.10.4  Finite products
Theorem	fprodseq 12167*	The value of a product over a nonempty finite set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝑘 = (𝐹‘𝑛) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ≤ 𝑀, (𝐺‘𝑛), 1)))‘𝑀))
Theorem	fprodntrivap 12168*	A non-triviality lemma for finite sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑦))
Theorem	prod0 12169	A product over the empty set is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ∏𝑘 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 = 1
Theorem	prod1dc 12170*	Any product of one over a valid set is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 5-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∨ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 1 = 1)
Theorem	prodfct 12171*	A lemma to facilitate conversions from the function form to the class-variable form of a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)‘𝑗) = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	fprodf1o 12172*	Re-index a finite product using a bijection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐺 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑛 ∈ 𝐶 𝐷)
Theorem	prodssdc 12173*	Change the index set to a subset in an upper integer product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐵, 𝐶, 1))) ⇝ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	fprodssdc 12174*	Change the index set to a subset in a finite sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	fprodmul 12175*	The product of two finite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 · 𝐶) = (∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 · ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶))
Theorem	prodsnf 12176*	A product of a singleton is the term. A version of prodsn 12177 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∏𝑘 ∈ {𝑀}𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	prodsn 12177*	A product of a singleton is the term. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∏𝑘 ∈ {𝑀}𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	fprod1 12178*	A finite product of only one term is the term itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑀)𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	climprod1 12179	The limit of a product over one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , (𝑍 × {1})) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	fprodsplitdc 12180*	Split a finite product into two parts. New proofs should use fprodsplit 12181 which is the same but with one fewer hypothesis. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑈 DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝑈 𝐶 = (∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 · ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶))
Theorem	fprodsplit 12181*	Split a finite product into two parts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝑈 𝐶 = (∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 · ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶))
Theorem	fprodm1 12182*	Separate out the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑁 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = (∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 − 1))𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	fprod1p 12183*	Separate out the first term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑀 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = (𝐵 · ∏𝑘 ∈ ((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁)𝐴))
Theorem	fprodp1 12184*	Multiply in the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = (𝑁 + 1) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))𝐴 = (∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	fprodm1s 12185*	Separate out the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = (∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 − 1))𝐴 · ⦋𝑁 / 𝑘⦌𝐴))
Theorem	fprodp1s 12186*	Multiply in the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))𝐴 = (∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 · ⦋(𝑁 + 1) / 𝑘⦌𝐴))
Theorem	prodsns 12187*	A product of the singleton is the term. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⦋𝑀 / 𝑘⦌𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → ∏𝑘 ∈ {𝑀}𝐴 = ⦋𝑀 / 𝑘⦌𝐴)
Theorem	fprodunsn 12188*	Multiply in an additional term in a finite product. See also fprodsplitsn 12217 which is the same but with a Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 hypothesis in place of the distinct variable condition between 𝜑 and 𝑘. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})𝐶 = (∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 · 𝐷))
Theorem	fprodcl2lem 12189*	Finite product closure lemma. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 17-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	fprodcllem 12190*	Finite product closure lemma. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	fprodcl 12191*	Closure of a finite product of complex numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	fprodrecl 12192*	Closure of a finite product of real numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	fprodzcl 12193*	Closure of a finite product of integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	fprodnncl 12194*	Closure of a finite product of positive integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	fprodrpcl 12195*	Closure of a finite product of positive reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	fprodnn0cl 12196*	Closure of a finite product of nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	fprodcllemf 12197*	Finite product closure lemma. A version of fprodcllem 12190 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	fprodreclf 12198*	Closure of a finite product of real numbers. A version of fprodrecl 12192 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	fprodfac 12199*	Factorial using product notation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → (!‘𝐴) = ∏𝑘 ∈ (1...𝐴)𝑘)
Theorem	fprodabs 12200*	The absolute value of a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴) = ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)(abs‘𝐴))