| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 132 of 172) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | pcaddlem 13101 | Lemma for pcadd 13102. The original numbers 𝐴 and 𝐵 have been decomposed using the prime count function as (𝑃↑𝑀) · (𝑅 / 𝑆) where 𝑅, 𝑆 are both not divisible by 𝑃 and 𝑀 = (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴), and similarly for 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((𝑃↑𝑀) · (𝑅 / 𝑆))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((𝑃↑𝑁) · (𝑇 / 𝑈))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pcadd 13102 | An inequality for the prime count of a sum. This is the source of the ultrametric inequality for the p-adic metric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pcadd2 13103 | The inequality of pcadd 13102 becomes an equality when one of the factors has prime count strictly less than the other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) < (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) = (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pcmptcl 13104 | Closure for the prime power map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:ℕ⟶ℕ ∧ seq1( · , 𝐹):ℕ⟶ℕ)) | ||
| Theorem | pcmpt 13105* | Construct a function with given prime count characteristics. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑃 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁)) = if(𝑃 ≤ 𝑁, 𝐵, 0)) | ||
| Theorem | pcmpt2 13106* | Dividing two prime count maps yields a number with all dividing primes confined to an interval. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑃 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt ((seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑀) / (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) = if((𝑃 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑁), 𝐵, 0)) | ||
| Theorem | pcmptdvds 13107 | The partial products of the prime power map form a divisibility chain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ∥ (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | pcprod 13108* | The product of the primes taken to their respective powers reconstructs the original number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑(𝑛 pCnt 𝑁)), 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) = 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | sumhashdc 13109* | The sum of 1 over a set is the size of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0) = (♯‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fldivp1 13110 | The difference between the floors of adjacent fractions is either 1 or 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((⌊‘((𝑀 + 1) / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘(𝑀 / 𝑁))) = if(𝑁 ∥ (𝑀 + 1), 1, 0)) | ||
| Theorem | pcfaclem 13111 | Lemma for pcfac 13112. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑀))) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | pcfac 13112* | Calculate the prime count of a factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑃 pCnt (!‘𝑁)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑀)(⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | pcbc 13113* | Calculate the prime count of a binomial coefficient. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑃 pCnt (𝑁C𝐾)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)((⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑘))) − ((⌊‘((𝑁 − 𝐾) / (𝑃↑𝑘))) + (⌊‘(𝐾 / (𝑃↑𝑘)))))) | ||
| Theorem | qexpz 13114 | If a power of a rational number is an integer, then the number is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∈ ℤ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | expnprm 13115 | A second or higher power of a rational number is not a prime number. Or by contraposition, the n-th root of a prime number is not rational. Suggested by Norm Megill. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → ¬ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∈ ℙ) | ||
| Theorem | oddprmdvds 13116* | Every positive integer which is not a power of two is divisible by an odd prime number. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐾 = (2↑𝑛)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2})𝑝 ∥ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | prmpwdvds 13117 | A relation involving divisibility by a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐷 ∥ (𝐾 · (𝑃↑𝑁)) ∧ ¬ 𝐷 ∥ (𝐾 · (𝑃↑(𝑁 − 1))))) → (𝑃↑𝑁) ∥ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | pockthlem 13118 | Lemma for pockthg 13119. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 pCnt 𝐴) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑄)) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑄 pCnt (𝑃 − 1))) | ||
| Theorem | pockthg 13119* | The generalized Pocklington's theorem. If 𝑁 − 1 = 𝐴 · 𝐵 where 𝐵 < 𝐴, then 𝑁 is prime if and only if for every prime factor 𝑝 of 𝐴, there is an 𝑥 such that 𝑥↑(𝑁 − 1) = 1( mod 𝑁) and gcd (𝑥↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑝) − 1, 𝑁) = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∥ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ (((𝑥↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = 1 ∧ (((𝑥↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑝)) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ) | ||
| Theorem | pockthi 13120 | Pocklington's theorem, which gives a sufficient criterion for a number 𝑁 to be prime. This is the preferred method for verifying large primes, being much more efficient to compute than trial division. This form has been optimized for application to specific large primes; see pockthg 13119 for a more general closed-form version. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐺 · 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐷 · (𝑃↑𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐷 < (𝑃↑𝐸) & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝑀) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (((𝐴↑𝐺) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1 ⇒ ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | infpnlem1 13121* | Lemma for infpn 13123. The smallest divisor (greater than 1) 𝑀 of 𝑁! + 1 is a prime greater than 𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = ((!‘𝑁) + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → (((1 < 𝑀 ∧ (𝐾 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℕ ((1 < 𝑗 ∧ (𝐾 / 𝑗) ∈ ℕ) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑗)) → (𝑁 < 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℕ ((𝑀 / 𝑗) ∈ ℕ → (𝑗 = 1 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑀))))) | ||
| Theorem | infpnlem2 13122* | Lemma for infpn 13123. For any positive integer 𝑁, there exists a prime number 𝑗 greater than 𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = ((!‘𝑁) + 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝑁 < 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝑗 / 𝑘) ∈ ℕ → (𝑘 = 1 ∨ 𝑘 = 𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | infpn 13123* | There exist infinitely many prime numbers: for any positive integer 𝑁, there exists a prime number 𝑗 greater than 𝑁. (See infpn2 13330 for the equinumerosity version.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝑁 < 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝑗 / 𝑘) ∈ ℕ → (𝑘 = 1 ∨ 𝑘 = 𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | prmunb 13124* | The primes are unbounded. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 < 𝑝) | ||
| Theorem | 1arithlem1 13125* | Lemma for 1arith 13129. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀‘𝑁) = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | 1arithlem2 13126* | Lemma for 1arith 13129. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑀‘𝑁)‘𝑃) = (𝑃 pCnt 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 1arithlem3 13127* | Lemma for 1arith 13129. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀‘𝑁):ℙ⟶ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | 1arithlem4 13128* | Lemma for 1arith 13129. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑦 ∈ ℙ, (𝑦↑(𝐹‘𝑦)), 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℙ⟶ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 𝑞)) → (𝐹‘𝑞) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝐹 = (𝑀‘𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | 1arith 13129* | Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a sequence of prime exponents, for which only finitely many primes have nonzero exponent. The function 𝑀 maps the set of positive integers one-to-one onto the set of prime factorizations 𝑅. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} ⇒ ⊢ 𝑀:ℕ–1-1-onto→𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | 1arith2 13130* | Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a finite monotonic 1-based sequence of primes. Every positive integer has a unique prime factorization. Theorem 1.10 in [ApostolNT] p. 17. This is Metamath 100 proof #80. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑔 ∈ 𝑅 (𝑀‘𝑧) = 𝑔 | ||
| Syntax | cgz 13131 | Extend class notation with the set of gaussian integers. |
| class ℤ[i] | ||
| Definition | df-gz 13132 | Define the set of gaussian integers, which are complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are integers. (Note that the [i] is actually part of the symbol token and has no independent meaning.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ℤ[i] = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((ℜ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ)} | ||
| Theorem | elgz 13133 | Elementhood in the gaussian integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (ℜ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ)) | ||
| Theorem | gzcn 13134 | A gaussian integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | zgz 13135 | An integer is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | igz 13136 | i is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ i ∈ ℤ[i] | ||
| Theorem | gznegcl 13137 | The gaussian integers are closed under negation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → -𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzcjcl 13138 | The gaussian integers are closed under conjugation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → (∗‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzaddcl 13139 | The gaussian integers are closed under addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzmulcl 13140 | The gaussian integers are closed under multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzreim 13141 | Construct a gaussian integer from real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzsubcl 13142 | The gaussian integers are closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i]) | ||
| Theorem | gzabssqcl 13143 | The squared norm of a gaussian integer is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem5 13144 | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem6 13145 | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (-(𝑀 / 2) ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < (𝑀 / 2))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem7 13146 | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵↑2) ≤ (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem8 13147 | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐵↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem9 13148 | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐵↑2) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝐴↑2)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem10 13149 | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐵↑2)) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem1 13150* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. The set 𝑆 is the set of all numbers that are expressible as a sum of four squares. Our goal is to show that 𝑆 = ℕ0; here we show one subset direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ0 | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem2 13151* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. Change bound variables in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2)))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem3 13152* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. Sufficient condition to be in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem4a 13153* | Lemma for 4sqlem4 13154. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2)) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem4 13154* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. We can express the four-square property more compactly in terms of gaussian integers, because the norms of gaussian integers are exactly sums of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] ∃𝑣 ∈ ℤ[i] 𝐴 = (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + ((abs‘𝑣)↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | mul4sqlem 13155* | Lemma for mul4sq 13156: algebraic manipulations. The extra assumptions involving 𝑀 would let us know not just that the product is a sum of squares, but also that it preserves divisibility by 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (((abs‘𝐶)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐷)↑2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐶) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵 − 𝐷) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i]) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 / 𝑀) · (𝑌 / 𝑀)) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | mul4sq 13156* | Euler's four-square identity: The product of two sums of four squares is also a sum of four squares. This is usually quoted as an explicit formula involving eight real variables; we save some time by working with complex numbers (gaussian integers) instead, so that we only have to work with four variables, and also hiding the actual formula for the product in the proof of mul4sqlem 13155. (For the curious, the explicit formula that is used is ( ∣ 𝑎 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑏 ∣ ↑2)( ∣ 𝑐 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑑 ∣ ↑2) = ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑐 + 𝑏 · 𝑑∗ ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑑 − 𝑏 · 𝑐∗ ∣ ↑2.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlemafi 13157* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlemffi 13158* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. ran 𝐹 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqleminfi 13159* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqexercise1 13160* | Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 13162. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (𝑥↑2)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → DECID 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqexercise2 13161* | Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 13162. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → DECID 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlemsdc 13162* |
Lemma for 4sq 13172. The property of being the sum of four
squares is
decidable.
The proof involves showing that (for a particular 𝐴) there are only a finite number of possible ways that it could be the sum of four squares, so checking each of those possibilities in turn decides whether the number is the sum of four squares. If this proof is hard to follow, especially because of its length, the simplified versions at 4sqexercise1 13160 and 4sqexercise2 13161 may help clarify, as they are using very much the same techniques on simplified versions of this lemma. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → DECID 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem11 13163* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. Use the pigeonhole principle to show that the sets {𝑚↑2 ∣ 𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)} and {-1 − 𝑛↑2 ∣ 𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)} have a common element, mod 𝑃. Note that although the conclusion is stated in terms of 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹 being nonempty, it is also inhabited by 4sqleminfi 13159 and fin0 7183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem12 13164* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. For any odd prime 𝑃, there is a 𝑘 < 𝑃 such that 𝑘𝑃 − 1 is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + 1) = (𝑘 · 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem13m 13165* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑀 < 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem14 13166* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem15 13167* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → ((((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐸↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐹↑2)) = 0) ∧ (((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐺↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐻↑2)) = 0))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem16 13168* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ ((𝑅 = 0 ∨ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑃)))) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem17 13169* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)))) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem18 13170* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. Inductive step, odd prime case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆} & ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | 4sqlem19 13171* | Lemma for 4sq 13172. The proof is by strong induction - we show that if all the integers less than 𝑘 are in 𝑆, then 𝑘 is as well. In this part of the proof we do the induction argument and dispense with all the cases except the odd prime case, which is sent to 4sqlem18 13170. If 𝑘 is 0, 1, 2, we show 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 directly; otherwise if 𝑘 is composite, 𝑘 is the product of two numbers less than it (and hence in 𝑆 by assumption), so by mul4sq 13156 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⇒ ⊢ ℕ0 = 𝑆 | ||
| Theorem | 4sq 13172* | Lagrange's four-square theorem, or Bachet's conjecture: every nonnegative integer is expressible as a sum of four squares. This is Metamath 100 proof #19. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2)))) | ||
| Theorem | dec2dvds 13173 | Divisibility by two is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐵 · 2) = 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ ;𝐴𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | dec5dvds 13174 | Divisibility by five is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 < 5 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 5 ∥ ;𝐴𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | dec5dvds2 13175 | Divisibility by five is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 < 5 & ⊢ (5 + 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 5 ∥ ;𝐴𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | dec5nprm 13176 | A decimal number greater than 10 and ending with five is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ ¬ ;𝐴5 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | dec2nprm 13177 | A decimal number greater than 10 and ending with an even digit is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐵 · 2) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ ;𝐴𝐶 ∈ ℙ | ||
| Theorem | modxai 13178 | Add exponents in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐶) mod 𝑁) = (𝐿 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | mod2xi 13179 | Double exponents in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (2 · 𝐵) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | modxp1i 13180 | Add one to an exponent in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝐵 + 1) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | modsubi 13181 | Subtract from within a mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝑀 + 𝐵) = 𝐾 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | gcdi 13182 | Calculate a GCD via Euclid's algorithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝑁 gcd 𝑅) = 𝐺 & ⊢ ((𝐾 · 𝑁) + 𝑅) = 𝑀 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 𝐺 | ||
| Theorem | gcdmodi 13183 | Calculate a GCD via Euclid's algorithm. Theorem 5.6 in [ApostolNT] p. 109. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ (𝐾 mod 𝑁) = (𝑅 mod 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝑁 gcd 𝑅) = 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 gcd 𝑁) = 𝐺 | ||
| Theorem | numexp0 13184 | Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴↑0) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | numexp1 13185 | Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴↑1) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | numexpp1 13186 | Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝑀 + 1) = 𝑁 & ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝑀) · 𝐴) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴↑𝑁) = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | numexp2x 13187 | Double an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (2 · 𝑀) = 𝑁 & ⊢ (𝐴↑𝑀) = 𝐷 & ⊢ (𝐷 · 𝐷) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴↑𝑁) = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | decsplit0b 13188 | Split a decimal number into two parts. Base case: 𝑁 = 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑0)) + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | decsplit0 13189 | Split a decimal number into two parts. Base case: 𝑁 = 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑0)) + 0) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | decsplit1 13190 | Split a decimal number into two parts. Base case: 𝑁 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑1)) + 𝐵) = ;𝐴𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | decsplit 13191 | Split a decimal number into two parts. Inductive step. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝑀 + 1) = 𝑁 & ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑𝑁)) + ;𝐵𝐷) = ;𝐶𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | karatsuba 13192 | The Karatsuba multiplication algorithm. If 𝑋 and 𝑌 are decomposed into two groups of digits of length 𝑀 (only the lower group is known to be this size but the algorithm is most efficient when the partition is chosen near the middle of the digit string), then 𝑋𝑌 can be written in three groups of digits, where each group needs only one multiplication. Thus, we can halve both inputs with only three multiplications on the smaller operands, yielding an asymptotic improvement of n^(log2 3) instead of n^2 for the "naive" algorithm decmul1c 9824. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝑅 & ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = 𝑇 & ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝑅 + 𝑆) + 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝐵) = 𝑋 & ⊢ ((𝐶 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝐷) = 𝑌 & ⊢ ((𝑅 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝑆) = 𝑊 & ⊢ ((𝑊 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝑇) = 𝑍 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 · 𝑌) = 𝑍 | ||
| Theorem | 2exp4 13193 | Two to the fourth power is 16. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (2↑4) = ;16 | ||
| Theorem | 2exp5 13194 | Two to the fifth power is 32. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (2↑5) = ;32 | ||
| Theorem | 2exp6 13195 | Two to the sixth power is 64. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (2↑6) = ;64 | ||
| Theorem | 2exp7 13196 | Two to the seventh power is 128. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (2↑7) = ;;128 | ||
| Theorem | 2exp8 13197 | Two to the eighth power is 256. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (2↑8) = ;;256 | ||
| Theorem | 2exp11 13198 | Two to the eleventh power is 2048. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (2↑;11) = ;;;2048 | ||
| Theorem | 2exp16 13199 | Two to the sixteenth power is 65536. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (2↑;16) = ;;;;65536 | ||
| Theorem | 3exp3 13200 | Three to the third power is 27. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (3↑3) = ;27 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |