P. 52 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 5101-5200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	resdm2 5101	A class restricted to its domain equals its double converse. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ↾ dom 𝐴) = ◡◡𝐴
Theorem	resdmres 5102	Restriction to the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ↾ dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)
Theorem	imadmres 5103	The image of the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 “ 𝐵)
Theorem	mptpreima 5104*	The preimage of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶}
Theorem	mptiniseg 5105*	Converse singleton image of a function defined by maps-to. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐹 “ {𝐶}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 = 𝐶})
Theorem	dmmpt 5106	The domain of the mapping operation in general. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ V}
Theorem	dmmptss 5107*	The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	dmmptg 5108*	The domain of the mapping operation is the stated domain, if the function value is always a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → dom (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	relco 5109	A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.)
⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	dfco2 5110*	Alternate definition of a class composition, using only one bound variable. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ V ((◡𝐵 “ {𝑥}) × (𝐴 “ {𝑥}))
Theorem	dfco2a 5111*	Generalization of dfco2 5110, where 𝐶 can have any value between dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵 and V. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ((◡𝐵 “ {𝑥}) × (𝐴 “ {𝑥})))
Theorem	coundi 5112	Class composition distributes over union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶))
Theorem	coundir 5113	Class composition distributes over union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶))
Theorem	cores 5114	Restricted first member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	resco 5115	Associative law for the restriction of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶))
Theorem	imaco 5116	Image of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by Jason Orendorff, 12-Dec-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = (𝐴 “ (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	rnco 5117	The range of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ran (𝐴 ↾ ran 𝐵)
Theorem	rnco2 5118	The range of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ ran 𝐵)
Theorem	dmco 5119	The domain of a composition. Exercise 27 of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.)
⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (◡𝐵 “ dom 𝐴)
Theorem	coiun 5120*	Composition with an indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cocnvcnv1 5121	A composition is not affected by a double converse of its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ (◡◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cocnvcnv2 5122	A composition is not affected by a double converse of its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ◡◡𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cores2 5123	Absorption of a reverse (preimage) restriction of the second member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∘ ◡(◡𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	co02 5124	Composition with the empty set. Theorem 20 of [Suppes] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∅) = ∅
Theorem	co01 5125	Composition with the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∅ ∘ 𝐴) = ∅
Theorem	coi1 5126	Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∘ I ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	coi2 5127	Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → ( I ∘ 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	coires1 5128	Composition with a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by FL, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ( I ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)
Theorem	coass 5129	Associative law for class composition. Theorem 27 of [Suppes] p. 64. Also Exercise 21 of [Enderton] p. 53. Interestingly, this law holds for any classes whatsoever, not just functions or even relations. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶))
Theorem	relcnvtr 5130	A relation is transitive iff its converse is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 ∘ ◡𝑅) ⊆ ◡𝑅))
Theorem	relssdmrn 5131	A relation is included in the cross product of its domain and range. Exercise 4.12(t) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ (dom 𝐴 × ran 𝐴))
Theorem	cnvssrndm 5132	The converse is a subset of the cartesian product of range and domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ◡𝐴 ⊆ (ran 𝐴 × dom 𝐴)
Theorem	cossxp 5133	Composition as a subset of the cross product of factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ (dom 𝐵 × ran 𝐴)
Theorem	cossxp2 5134	The composition of two relations is a relation, with bounds on its domain and codomain. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐶))
Theorem	cocnvres 5135	Restricting a relation and a converse relation when they are composed together. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡𝑅) = ((𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑅) ∘ ◡(𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑆))
Theorem	cocnvss 5136	Upper bound for the composed of a relation and an inverse relation. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡𝑅) ⊆ (ran (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑅))
Theorem	relrelss 5137	Two ways to describe the structure of a two-place operation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel dom 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
Theorem	unielrel 5138	The membership relation for a relation is inherited by class union. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝑅)
Theorem	relfld 5139	The double union of a relation is its field. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
Theorem	relresfld 5140	Restriction of a relation to its field. (Contributed by FL, 15-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) = 𝑅)
Theorem	relcoi2 5141	Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 2-May-2011.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑅) = 𝑅)
Theorem	relcoi1 5142	Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 8-May-2011.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∘ ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	unidmrn 5143	The double union of the converse of a class is its field. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ∪ ∪ ◡𝐴 = (dom 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐴)
Theorem	relcnvfld 5144	if 𝑅 is a relation, its double union equals the double union of its converse. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ ◡𝑅)
Theorem	dfdm2 5145	Alternate definition of domain df-dm 4621 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2010.)
⊢ dom 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ (◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐴)
Theorem	unixpm 5146*	The double class union of an inhabited cross product is the union of its members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	unixp0im 5147	The union of an empty cross product is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ → ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	cnvexg 5148	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	cnvex 5149	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ◡𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	relcnvexb 5150	A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ V))
Theorem	ressn 5151	Restriction of a class to a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ↾ {𝐵}) = ({𝐵} × (𝐴 “ {𝐵}))
Theorem	cnviinm 5152*	The converse of an intersection is the intersection of the converse. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ◡∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cnvpom 5153*	The converse of a partial order relation is a partial order relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Po 𝐴))
Theorem	cnvsom 5154*	The converse of a strict order relation is a strict order relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Or 𝐴))
Theorem	coexg 5155	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	coex 5156	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	xpcom 5157*	Composition of two cross products. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐶))
2.6.7  Definite description binder (inverted iota)
Syntax	cio 5158	Extend class notation with Russell's definition description binder (inverted iota).
class (℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	iotajust 5159*	Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 5160. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}
Definition	df-iota 5160*	Define Russell's definition description binder, which can be read as "the unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑," where 𝜑 ordinarily contains 𝑥 as a free variable. Our definition is meaningful only when there is exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true (see iotaval 5171); otherwise, it evaluates to the empty set (see iotanul 5175). Russell used the inverted iota symbol ℩ to represent the binder. Sometimes proofs need to expand an iota-based definition. That is, given "X = the x for which ... x ... x ..." holds, the proof needs to get to "... X ... X ...". A general strategy to do this is to use iotacl 5183 (for unbounded iota). This can be easier than applying a version that applies an explicit substitution, because substituting an iota into its own property always has a bound variable clash which must be first renamed or else guarded with NF. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}}
Theorem	dfiota2 5161*	Alternate definition for descriptions. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)}
Theorem	nfiota1 5162	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	nfiotadw 5163*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	nfiotaw 5164*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	cbviota 5165	Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbviotav 5166*	Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	sb8iota 5167	Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 2032. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iotaeq 5168	Equality theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	iotabi 5169	Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	uniabio 5170*	Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotaval 5171*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotauni 5172	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iotaint 5173	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota1 5174	Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥))
Theorem	iotanul 5175	Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅)
Theorem	euiotaex 5176	Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	iotass 5177*	Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	iota4 5178	Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota4an 5179	Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota5 5180*	A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴)
Theorem	iotabidv 5181*	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	iotabii 5182	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	iotacl 5183	Membership law for descriptions. This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 5160). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota2df 5184	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2d 5185*	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	eliota 5186*	An element of an iota expression. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (℩𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝐴 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	eliotaeu 5187	An inhabited iota expression has a unique value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (℩𝑥𝜑) → ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	iota2 5188*	The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴))
Theorem	sniota 5189	A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)})
Theorem	iotam 5190*	Representation of "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴 which is inhabited (that means that "the unique element such that 𝜑 " exists). (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 = (℩𝑥𝜑)) → 𝜓)
Theorem	csbiotag 5191*	Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
2.6.8  Functions
Syntax	wfun 5192	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.)
wff Fun 𝐴
Syntax	wfn 5193	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.)
wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵
Syntax	wf 5194	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.)
wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵
Syntax	wf1 5195	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵
Syntax	wfo 5196	Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵
Syntax	wf1o 5197	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one onto 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵
Syntax	cfv 5198	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. (Read: The value of 𝐹 at 𝐴, or "𝐹 of 𝐴.")
class (𝐹‘𝐴)
Syntax	wiso 5199	Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. (Read: 𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵.)
wff 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)
Definition	df-fun 5200	Define predicate that determines if some class 𝐴 is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun I is true (funi 5230). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 4050 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 4052). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 5201), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 5202), a one-to-one function (df-f1 5203), an onto function (df-fo 5204), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 5205). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 5208, dffun4 5209, dffun6 5212, dffun7 5225, dffun8 5226, and dffun9 5227. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐴) ⊆ I ))