Home | Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 52 of 133) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | iotaint 5101 | Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
Theorem | iota1 5102 | Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | iotanul 5103 | Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | euiotaex 5104 | Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | iotass 5105* | Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | iota4 5106 | Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | iota4an 5107 | Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | iota5 5108* | A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | iotabidv 5109* | Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | iotabii 5110 | Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓) | ||
Theorem | iotacl 5111 |
Membership law for descriptions.
This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 5088). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
Theorem | iota2df 5112 | A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | iota2d 5113* | A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | iota2 5114* | The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | sniota 5115 | A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)}) | ||
Theorem | csbiotag 5116* | Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Syntax | wfun 5117 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.) |
wff Fun 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | wfn 5118 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.) |
wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵 | ||
Syntax | wf 5119 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.) |
wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 | ||
Syntax | wf1 5120 | Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 | ||
Syntax | wfo 5121 | Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 | ||
Syntax | wf1o 5122 | Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one onto 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 | ||
Syntax | cfv 5123 | Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. (Read: The value of 𝐹 at 𝐴, or "𝐹 of 𝐴.") |
class (𝐹‘𝐴) | ||
Syntax | wiso 5124 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. (Read: 𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) |
wff 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
Definition | df-fun 5125 | Define predicate that determines if some class 𝐴 is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun I is true (funi 5155). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 3989 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 3991). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 5126), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 5127), a one-to-one function (df-f1 5128), an onto function (df-fo 5129), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 5130). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 5133, dffun4 5134, dffun6 5137, dffun7 5150, dffun8 5151, and dffun9 5152. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐴) ⊆ I )) | ||
Definition | df-fn 5126 | Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 Fn 𝐵 ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Definition | df-f 5127 | Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
Definition | df-f1 5128 | Define a one-to-one function. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)) | ||
Definition | df-fo 5129 | Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵)) | ||
Definition | df-f1o 5130 | Define a one-to-one onto function. Compare Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵)) | ||
Definition | df-fv 5131* | Define the value of a function, (𝐹‘𝐴), also known as function application. For example, ( I ‘∅) = ∅. Typically, function 𝐹 is defined using maps-to notation (see df-mpt 3991), but this is not required. For example, F = { 〈 2 , 6 〉, 〈 3 , 9 〉 } -> ( F ‘ 3 ) = 9 . We will later define two-argument functions using ordered pairs as (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉). This particular definition is quite convenient: it can be applied to any class and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful. The left apostrophe notation originated with Peano and was adopted in Definition *30.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 235, Definition 10.11 of [Quine] p. 68, and Definition 6.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. It means the same thing as the more familiar 𝐹(𝐴) notation for a function's value at 𝐴, i.e. "𝐹 of 𝐴," but without context-dependent notational ambiguity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) Revised to use ℩. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥) | ||
Definition | df-isom 5132* | Define the isomorphism predicate. We read this as "𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵." Normally, 𝑅 and 𝑆 are ordering relations on 𝐴 and 𝐵 respectively. Definition 6.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32, whose notation is the same as ours except that 𝑅 and 𝑆 are subscripts. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | dffun2 5133* | Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑥𝐴𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | dffun4 5134* | Alternate definition of a function. Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | dffun5r 5135* | A way of proving a relation is a function, analogous to mo2r 2051. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2020.) |
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) → Fun 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | dffun6f 5136* | Definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | dffun6 5137* | Alternate definition of a function using "at most one" notation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ (Rel 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | funmo 5138* | A function has at most one value for each argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) | ||
Theorem | dffun4f 5139* | Definition of function like dffun4 5134 but using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | funrel 5140 | A function is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Rel 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 0nelfun 5141 | A function does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Nov-2021.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝑅 → ∅ ∉ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | funss 5142 | Subclass theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐵 → Fun 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | funeq 5143 | Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | funeqi 5144 | Equality inference for the function predicate. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | funeqd 5145 | Equality deduction for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2013.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | nffun 5146 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a function. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun 𝐹 | ||
Theorem | sbcfung 5147 | Distribute proper substitution through the function predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | funeu 5148* | There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) | ||
Theorem | funeu2 5149* | There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐹) → ∃!𝑦〈𝐴, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | dffun7 5150* | Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. (Enderton's definition is ambiguous because "there is only one" could mean either "there is at most one" or "there is exactly one." However, dffun8 5151 shows that it doesn't matter which meaning we pick.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | dffun8 5151* | Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. Compare dffun7 5150. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | dffun9 5152* | Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴 𝑥𝐴𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | funfn 5153 | An equivalence for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 Fn dom 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | funfnd 5154 | A function is a function over its domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 Fn dom 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | funi 5155 | The identity relation is a function. Part of Theorem 10.4 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) |
⊢ Fun I | ||
Theorem | nfunv 5156 | The universe is not a function. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 27-Jan-2004.) |
⊢ ¬ Fun V | ||
Theorem | funopg 5157 | A Kuratowski ordered pair is a function only if its components are equal. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | funopab 5158* | A class of ordered pairs is a function when there is at most one second member for each pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) |
⊢ (Fun {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦𝜑) | ||
Theorem | funopabeq 5159* | A class of ordered pairs of values is a function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) |
⊢ Fun {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐴} | ||
Theorem | funopab4 5160* | A class of ordered pairs of values in the form used by df-mpt 3991 is a function. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) |
⊢ Fun {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴)} | ||
Theorem | funmpt 5161 | A function in maps-to notation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ Fun (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | funmpt2 5162 | Functionality of a class given by a maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ Fun 𝐹 | ||
Theorem | funco 5163 | The composition of two functions is a function. Exercise 29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) → Fun (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | funres 5164 | A restriction of a function is a function. Compare Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | funssres 5165 | The restriction of a function to the domain of a subclass equals the subclass. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹) → (𝐹 ↾ dom 𝐺) = 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | fun2ssres 5166 | Equality of restrictions of a function and a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐺) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | funun 5167 | The union of functions with disjoint domains is a function. Theorem 4.6 of [Monk1] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) = ∅) → Fun (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | funcnvsn 5168 | The converse singleton of an ordered pair is a function. This is equivalent to funsn 5171 via cnvsn 5021, but stating it this way allows us to skip the sethood assumptions on 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ Fun ◡{〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} | ||
Theorem | funsng 5169 | A singleton of an ordered pair is a function. Theorem 10.5 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → Fun {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉}) | ||
Theorem | fnsng 5170 | Functionality and domain of the singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} Fn {𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | funsn 5171 | A singleton of an ordered pair is a function. Theorem 10.5 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ Fun {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} | ||
Theorem | funinsn 5172 | A function based on the singleton of an ordered pair. Unlike funsng 5169, this holds even if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is a proper class. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Apr-2022.) |
⊢ Fun ({〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | funprg 5173 | A set of two pairs is a function if their first members are different. (Contributed by FL, 26-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → Fun {〈𝐴, 𝐶〉, 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉}) | ||
Theorem | funtpg 5174 | A set of three pairs is a function if their first members are different. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Dec-2017.) |
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)) → Fun {〈𝑋, 𝐴〉, 〈𝑌, 𝐵〉, 〈𝑍, 𝐶〉}) | ||
Theorem | funpr 5175 | A function with a domain of two elements. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2010.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → Fun {〈𝐴, 𝐶〉, 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉}) | ||
Theorem | funtp 5176 | A function with a domain of three elements. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → Fun {〈𝐴, 𝐷〉, 〈𝐵, 𝐸〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐹〉}) | ||
Theorem | fnsn 5177 | Functionality and domain of the singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} Fn {𝐴} | ||
Theorem | fnprg 5178 | Function with a domain of two different values. (Contributed by FL, 26-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {〈𝐴, 𝐶〉, 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉} Fn {𝐴, 𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | fntpg 5179 | Function with a domain of three different values. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Dec-2017.) |
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)) → {〈𝑋, 𝐴〉, 〈𝑌, 𝐵〉, 〈𝑍, 𝐶〉} Fn {𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍}) | ||
Theorem | fntp 5180 | A function with a domain of three elements. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → {〈𝐴, 𝐷〉, 〈𝐵, 𝐸〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐹〉} Fn {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}) | ||
Theorem | fun0 5181 | The empty set is a function. Theorem 10.3 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1998.) |
⊢ Fun ∅ | ||
Theorem | funcnvcnv 5182 | The double converse of a function is a function. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2004.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Fun ◡◡𝐴) | ||
Theorem | funcnv2 5183* | A simpler equivalence for single-rooted (see funcnv 5184). (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦∃*𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦) | ||
Theorem | funcnv 5184* | The converse of a class is a function iff the class is single-rooted, which means that for any 𝑦 in the range of 𝐴 there is at most one 𝑥 such that 𝑥𝐴𝑦. Definition of single-rooted in [Enderton] p. 43. See funcnv2 5183 for a simpler version. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴∃*𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦) | ||
Theorem | funcnv3 5185* | A condition showing a class is single-rooted. (See funcnv 5184). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) |
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴∃!𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴 𝑥𝐴𝑦) | ||
Theorem | funcnveq 5186* | Another way of expressing that a class is single-rooted. Counterpart to dffun2 5133. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑧𝐴𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | fun2cnv 5187* | The double converse of a class is a function iff the class is single-valued. Each side is equivalent to Definition 6.4(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23, who use the notation "Un(A)" for single-valued. Note that 𝐴 is not necessarily a function. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦) | ||
Theorem | svrelfun 5188 | A single-valued relation is a function. (See fun2cnv 5187 for "single-valued.") Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡◡𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | fncnv 5189* | Single-rootedness (see funcnv 5184) of a class cut down by a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2007.) |
⊢ (◡(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) Fn 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑦) | ||
Theorem | fun11 5190* | Two ways of stating that 𝐴 is one-to-one (but not necessarily a function). Each side is equivalent to Definition 6.4(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24, who use the notation "Un2 (A)" for one-to-one (but not necessarily a function). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.) |
⊢ ((Fun ◡◡𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑧𝐴𝑤) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤))) | ||
Theorem | fununi 5191* | The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of functions is a function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (Fun 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → Fun ∪ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | funcnvuni 5192* | The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of single-rooted sets is single-rooted. (See funcnv 5184 for "single-rooted" definition.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (Fun ◡𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → Fun ◡∪ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fun11uni 5193* | The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of one-to-one functions is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → (Fun ∪ 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡∪ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | funin 5194 | The intersection with a function is a function. Exercise 14(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ∩ 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | funres11 5195 | The restriction of a one-to-one function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐹 → Fun ◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | funcnvres 5196 | The converse of a restricted function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐹 → ◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (◡𝐹 ↾ (𝐹 “ 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | cnvresid 5197 | Converse of a restricted identity function. (Contributed by FL, 4-Mar-2007.) |
⊢ ◡( I ↾ 𝐴) = ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | funcnvres2 5198 | The converse of a restriction of the converse of a function equals the function restricted to the image of its converse. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2005.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ◡(◡𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐹 ↾ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | funimacnv 5199 | The image of the preimage of a function. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2004.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹 “ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | funimass1 5200 | A kind of contraposition law that infers a subclass of an image from a preimage subclass. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2004.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐹) → ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |