Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 5101-5200 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | dfse2 5101* |
Alternate definition of set-like relation. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑥})) ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | exse2 5102 |
Any set relation is set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
22-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | imass1 5103 |
Subset theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | imass2 5104 |
Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | ndmima 5105 |
The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM,
22-May-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 → (𝐵 “ {𝐴}) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | relcnv 5106 |
A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed
by NM, 29-Oct-1996.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ◡𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | relbrcnvg 5107 |
When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood
assumptions on brcnv 4905 can be
omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | eliniseg2 5108 |
Eliminate the class existence constraint in eliniseg 5098. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | relbrcnv 5109 |
When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood
assumptions on brcnv 4905 can be
omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | cotr 5110* |
Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity
in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by
NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)) |
| |
| Theorem | issref 5111* |
Two ways to state a relation is reflexive. Adapted from Tarski.
(Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvsym 5112* |
Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of
symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | intasym 5113* |
Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of
antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51.
(Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) |
| |
| Theorem | asymref 5114* |
Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive.
∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 5257. (Contributed by
NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) |
| |
| Theorem | intirr 5115* |
Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of
irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51.
(Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | brcodir 5116* |
Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed
by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
| |
| Theorem | codir 5117* |
Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧(𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) |
| |
| Theorem | qfto 5118* |
A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpidtr 5119 |
A square cross product (𝐴 × 𝐴) is a transitive relation.
(Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trin2 5120 |
The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed
by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) |
| |
| Theorem | poirr2 5121 |
A partial order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | trinxp 5122 |
The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is
transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a square cross
product is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed
by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | soirri 5123 |
A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM,
10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆
& ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sotri 5124 |
A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM,
10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆
& ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | son2lpi 5125 |
A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM,
10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆
& ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | sotri2 5126 |
A transitivity relation. (Read ¬ B < A and B
< C implies A < C .)
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆
& ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | sotri3 5127 |
A transitivity relation. (Read A < B and ¬ C
< B implies A < C .)
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆
& ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | poleloe 5128 |
Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders.
(Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | poltletr 5129 |
Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
17-Jan-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvopab 5130* |
The converse of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by
NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ◡{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | mptcnv 5131* |
The converse of a mapping function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux,
16-Jan-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | cnv0 5132 |
The converse of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ◡∅ = ∅ |
| |
| Theorem | cnvi 5133 |
The converse of the identity relation. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Monk1]
p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew
Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ◡ I
= I |
| |
| Theorem | cnvun 5134 |
The converse of a union is the union of converses. Theorem 16 of
[Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM,
25-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by
Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∪ ◡𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvdif 5135 |
Distributive law for converse over set difference. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∖ ◡𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvin 5136 |
Distributive law for converse over intersection. Theorem 15 of [Suppes]
p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Jun-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∩ ◡𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | rnun 5137 |
Distributive law for range over union. Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 60.
(Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | rnin 5138 |
The range of an intersection belongs the intersection of ranges. Theorem
9 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM,
15-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | rniun 5139 |
The range of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
29-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ran ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | rnuni 5140* |
The range of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41.
(Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
29-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ran ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝑥 |
| |
| Theorem | imaundi 5141 |
Distributive law for image over union. Theorem 35 of [Suppes] p. 65.
(Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 “ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | imaundir 5142 |
The image of a union. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Feb-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | dminss 5143 |
An upper bound for intersection with a domain. Theorem 40 of [Suppes]
p. 66, who calls it "somewhat surprising". (Contributed by
NM,
11-Aug-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (dom 𝑅 ∩ 𝐴) ⊆ (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | imainss 5144 |
An upper bound for intersection with an image. Theorem 41 of [Suppes]
p. 66. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | inimass 5145 |
The image of an intersection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux,
16-Dec-2017.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) ⊆ ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | inimasn 5146 |
The intersection of the image of singleton. (Contributed by Thierry
Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ {𝐶}) = ((𝐴 “ {𝐶}) ∩ (𝐵 “ {𝐶}))) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvxp 5147 |
The converse of a cross product. Exercise 11 of [Suppes] p. 67.
(Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐵 × 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | xp0 5148 |
The cross product with the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.13(ii)
of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM,
12-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 × ∅) =
∅ |
| |
| Theorem | xpmlem 5149* |
The cross product of inhabited classes is inhabited. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 11-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpm 5150* |
The cross product of inhabited classes is inhabited. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpeq0r 5151 |
A cross product is empty if at least one member is empty. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 12-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | sqxpeq0 5152 |
A Cartesian square is empty iff its member is empty. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 21-Apr-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | xpdisj1 5153 |
Cross products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
13-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐷)) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | xpdisj2 5154 |
Cross products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
13-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) ∩ (𝐷 × 𝐵)) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | xpsndisj 5155 |
Cross products with two different singletons are disjoint. (Contributed
by NM, 28-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∩ (𝐶 × {𝐷})) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | djudisj 5156* |
Disjoint unions with disjoint index sets are disjoint. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐶) ∩ ∪
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ({𝑦} × 𝐷)) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | resdisj 5157 |
A double restriction to disjoint classes is the empty set. (Contributed
by NM, 7-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | rnxpm 5158* |
The range of a cross product. Part of Theorem 3.13(x) of [Monk1] p. 37,
with nonempty changed to inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
12-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dmxpss 5159 |
The domain of a cross product is a subclass of the first factor.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2007.)
|
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | rnxpss 5160 |
The range of a cross product is a subclass of the second factor.
(Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | dmxpss2 5161 |
Upper bound for the domain of a binary relation. (Contributed by BJ,
10-Jul-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → dom 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | rnxpss2 5162 |
Upper bound for the range of a binary relation. (Contributed by BJ,
10-Jul-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ran 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | rnxpid 5163 |
The range of a square cross product. (Contributed by FL,
17-May-2010.)
|
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | ssxpbm 5164* |
A cross-product subclass relationship is equivalent to the relationship
for its components. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷))) |
| |
| Theorem | ssxp1 5165* |
Cross product subset cancellation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
14-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | ssxp2 5166* |
Cross product subset cancellation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
14-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xp11m 5167* |
The cross product of inhabited classes is one-to-one. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) |
| |
| Theorem | xpcanm 5168* |
Cancellation law for cross-product. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
14-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpcan2m 5169* |
Cancellation law for cross-product. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
14-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpexr2m 5170* |
If a nonempty cross product is a set, so are both of its components.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
| |
| Theorem | ssrnres 5171 |
Subset of the range of a restriction. (Contributed by NM,
16-Jan-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | rninxp 5172* |
Range of the intersection with a cross product. (Contributed by NM,
17-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝐶𝑦) |
| |
| Theorem | dminxp 5173* |
Domain of the intersection with a cross product. (Contributed by NM,
17-Jan-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (dom (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐶𝑦) |
| |
| Theorem | imainrect 5174 |
Image of a relation restricted to a rectangular region. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) “ 𝑌) = ((𝐺 “ (𝑌 ∩ 𝐴)) ∩ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xpima1 5175 |
The image by a cross product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux,
16-Dec-2017.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | xpima2m 5176* |
The image by a cross product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux,
16-Dec-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xpimasn 5177 |
The image of a singleton by a cross product. (Contributed by Thierry
Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvcnv3 5178* |
The set of all ordered pairs in a class is the same as the double
converse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ◡◡𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} |
| |
| Theorem | dfrel2 5179 |
Alternate definition of relation. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25.
(Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ ◡◡𝑅 = 𝑅) |
| |
| Theorem | dfrel4v 5180* |
A relation can be expressed as the set of ordered pairs in it.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvcnv 5181 |
The double converse of a class strips out all elements that are not
ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
|
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 = (𝐴 ∩ (V × V)) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvcnv2 5182 |
The double converse of a class equals its restriction to the universe.
(Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 = (𝐴 ↾ V) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvcnvss 5183 |
The double converse of a class is a subclass. Exercise 2 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed
by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ◡◡𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | cnveqb 5184 |
Equality theorem for converse. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | cnveq0 5185 |
A relation empty iff its converse is empty. (Contributed by FL,
19-Sep-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ◡𝐴 = ∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | dfrel3 5186 |
Alternate definition of relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ V) = 𝑅) |
| |
| Theorem | dmresv 5187 |
The domain of a universal restriction. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-2008.)
|
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ↾ V) = dom 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | rnresv 5188 |
The range of a universal restriction. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ↾ V) = ran 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | dfrn4 5189 |
Range defined in terms of image. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.)
|
| ⊢ ran 𝐴 = (𝐴 “ V) |
| |
| Theorem | csbrng 5190 |
Distribute proper substitution through the range of a class.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | rescnvcnv 5191 |
The restriction of the double converse of a class. (Contributed by NM,
8-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
| ⊢ (◡◡𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvcnvres 5192 |
The double converse of the restriction of a class. (Contributed by NM,
3-Jun-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ◡◡(𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (◡◡𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | imacnvcnv 5193 |
The image of the double converse of a class. (Contributed by NM,
8-Apr-2007.)
|
| ⊢ (◡◡𝐴 “ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dmsnm 5194* |
The domain of a singleton is inhabited iff the singleton argument is an
ordered pair. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ dom {𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | rnsnm 5195* |
The range of a singleton is inhabited iff the singleton argument is an
ordered pair. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ ran {𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | dmsn0 5196 |
The domain of the singleton of the empty set is empty. (Contributed by
NM, 30-Jan-2004.)
|
| ⊢ dom {∅} = ∅ |
| |
| Theorem | cnvsn0 5197 |
The converse of the singleton of the empty set is empty. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ◡{∅} = ∅ |
| |
| Theorem | dmsn0el 5198 |
The domain of a singleton is empty if the singleton's argument contains
the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.)
|
| ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐴 → dom {𝐴} = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | relsn2m 5199* |
A singleton is a relation iff it has an inhabited domain. (Contributed
by Jim Kingdon, 16-Dec-2018.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (Rel {𝐴} ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ dom {𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | dmsnopg 5200 |
The domain of a singleton of an ordered pair is the singleton of the
first member. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → dom {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} = {𝐴}) |