P. 131 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 13001-13100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ennnfonelemhdmp1 13001*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. Domain at a successor where we need to add an element to the sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐹‘(◡𝑁‘𝑃)) ∈ (𝐹 “ (◡𝑁‘𝑃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐻‘(𝑃 + 1)) = suc dom (𝐻‘𝑃))
Theorem	ennnfonelemss 13002*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. We only add elements to 𝐻 as the index increases. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑃) ⊆ (𝐻‘(𝑃 + 1)))
Theorem	ennnfoneleminc 13003*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. We only add elements to 𝐻 as the index increases. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≤ 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑃) ⊆ (𝐻‘𝑄))
Theorem	ennnfonelemkh 13004*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. Because we add zero or one entries for each new index, the length of each sequence is no greater than its index. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐻‘𝑃) ⊆ (◡𝑁‘𝑃))
Theorem	ennnfonelemhf1o 13005*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. Each of the functions in 𝐻 is one to one and onto an image of 𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑃):dom (𝐻‘𝑃)–1-1-onto→(𝐹 “ (◡𝑁‘𝑃)))
Theorem	ennnfonelemex 13006*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. Extending the sequence (𝐻‘𝑃) to include an additional element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 dom (𝐻‘𝑃) ∈ dom (𝐻‘𝑖))
Theorem	ennnfonelemhom 13007*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. The sequences in 𝐻 increase in length without bound if you go out far enough. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 𝑀 ∈ dom (𝐻‘𝑖))
Theorem	ennnfonelemrnh 13008*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. A consequence of ennnfonelemss 13002. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ran 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ran 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 ∨ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑋))
Theorem	ennnfonelemfun 13009*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. 𝐿 is a function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐿)
Theorem	ennnfonelemf1 13010*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. 𝐿 is one-to-one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:dom 𝐿–1-1→𝐴)
Theorem	ennnfonelemrn 13011*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. 𝐿 is onto 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐿 = 𝐴)
Theorem	ennnfonelemdm 13012*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. The function 𝐿 is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐿 = ω)
Theorem	ennnfonelemen 13013*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm ω), 𝑦 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑦), 𝑥, (𝑥 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑥, (𝐹‘𝑦)⟩})))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∅, (◡𝑁‘(𝑥 − 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seq0(𝐺, 𝐽)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐻‘𝑖)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)
Theorem	ennnfonelemnn0 13014*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. A version of ennnfonelemen 13013 expressed in terms of ℕ0 instead of ω. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑛)(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)
Theorem	ennnfonelemr 13015*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. The interesting direction, expressed in deduction form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ0–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑛)(𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑗))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)
Theorem	ennnfonelemim 13016*	Lemma for ennnfone 13017. The trivial direction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ℕ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:ℕ0–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑛)(𝑓‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑓‘𝑗))))
Theorem	ennnfone 13017*	A condition for a set being countably infinite. Corollary 8.1.13 of [AczelRathjen], p. 73. Roughly speaking, the condition says that 𝐴 is countable (that's the 𝑓:ℕ0–onto→𝐴 part, as seen in theorems like ctm 7292), infinite (that's the part about being able to find an element of 𝐴 distinct from any mapping of a natural number via 𝑓), and has decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ℕ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:ℕ0–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑛)(𝑓‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑓‘𝑗))))
Theorem	exmidunben 13018*	If any unbounded set of positive integers is equinumerous to ℕ, then the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO) implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑥 𝑚 < 𝑛) → 𝑥 ≈ ℕ) ∧ ω ∈ Omni) → EXMID)
Theorem	ctinfomlemom 13019*	Lemma for ctinfom 13020. Converting between ω and ℕ0. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑁 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ ◡𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ¬ (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺:ℕ0–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑚)(𝐺‘𝑗) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑖)))
Theorem	ctinfom 13020*	A condition for a set being countably infinite. Restates ennnfone 13017 in terms of ω and function image. Like ennnfone 13017 the condition can be summarized as 𝐴 being countable, infinite, and having decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ℕ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:ω–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ¬ (𝑓‘𝑘) ∈ (𝑓 “ 𝑛))))
Theorem	inffinp1 13021*	An infinite set contains an element not contained in a given finite subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ≼ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	ctinf 13022*	A set is countably infinite if and only if it has decidable equality, is countable, and is infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ℕ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→𝐴 ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	qnnen 13023	The rational numbers are countably infinite. Corollary 8.1.23 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. This is Metamath 100 proof #3. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ℚ ≈ ℕ
Theorem	enctlem 13024*	Lemma for enct 13025. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)))
Theorem	enct 13025*	Countability is invariant relative to equinumerosity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ↔ ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)))
Theorem	ctiunctlemu1st 13026*	Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑁)) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	ctiunctlemu2nd 13027*	Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑁)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑁))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)
Theorem	ctiunctlemuom 13028	Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ω)
Theorem	ctiunctlemudc 13029*	Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	ctiunctlemf 13030*	Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))) / 𝑥⦌𝐺‘(2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑈⟶∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	ctiunctlemfo 13031*	Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))) / 𝑥⦌𝐺‘(2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐻    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑈    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑈–onto→∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	ctiunct 13032*	A sequence of enumerations gives an enumeration of the union. We refer to "sequence of enumerations" rather than "countably many countable sets" because the hypothesis provides more than countability for each 𝐵(𝑥): it refers to 𝐵(𝑥) together with the 𝐺(𝑥) which enumerates it. Theorem 8.1.19 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. For "countably many countable sets" the key hypothesis would be (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑔𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o). This is almost omiunct 13036 (which uses countable choice) although that is for a countably infinite collection not any countable collection. Compare with the case of two sets instead of countably many, as seen at unct 13034, which says that the union of two countable sets is countable . The proof proceeds by mapping a natural number to a pair of natural numbers (by xpomen 12987) and using the first number to map to an element 𝑥 of 𝐴 and the second number to map to an element of B(x) . In this way we are able to map to every element of ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵. Although it would be possible to work directly with countability expressed as 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o), we instead use functions from subsets of the natural numbers via ctssdccl 7294 and ctssdc 7296. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→(∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊔ 1o))
Theorem	ctiunctal 13033*	Variation of ctiunct 13032 which allows 𝑥 to be present in 𝜑. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐺:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→(∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊔ 1o))
Theorem	unct 13034*	The union of two countable sets is countable. Corollary 8.1.20 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ∧ ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊔ 1o))
Theorem	omctfn 13035*	Using countable choice to find a sequence of enumerations for a collection of countable sets. Lemma 8.1.27 of [AczelRathjen], p. 77. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ω) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑥):ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)))
Theorem	omiunct 13036*	The union of a countably infinite collection of countable sets is countable. Theorem 8.1.28 of [AczelRathjen], p. 78. Compare with ctiunct 13032 which has a stronger hypothesis but does not require countable choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ω) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→(∪ 𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐵 ⊔ 1o))
Theorem	ssomct 13037*	A decidable subset of ω is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
Theorem	ssnnctlemct 13038*	Lemma for ssnnct 13039. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
Theorem	ssnnct 13039*	A decidable subset of ℕ is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
Theorem	nninfdclemcl 13040*	Lemma for nninfdc 13045. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃(𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < ))𝑄) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	nninfdclemf 13041*	Lemma for nninfdc 13045. A function from the natural numbers into 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝐴)
Theorem	nninfdclemp1 13042*	Lemma for nninfdc 13045. Each element of the sequence 𝐹 is greater than the previous element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑈) < (𝐹‘(𝑈 + 1)))
Theorem	nninfdclemlt 13043*	Lemma for nninfdc 13045. The function from nninfdclemf 13041 is strictly monotonic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 < 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑈) < (𝐹‘𝑉))
Theorem	nninfdclemf1 13044*	Lemma for nninfdc 13045. The function from nninfdclemf 13041 is one-to-one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ–1-1→𝐴)
Theorem	nninfdc 13045*	An unbounded decidable set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → ω ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	unbendc 13046*	An unbounded decidable set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)
Theorem	prminf 13047	There are an infinite number of primes. Theorem 1.7 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ℙ ≈ ℕ
Theorem	infpn2 13048*	There exist infinitely many prime numbers: the set of all primes 𝑆 is unbounded by infpn 12905, so by unbendc 13046 it is infinite. This is Metamath 100 proof #11. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (1 < 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑛 / 𝑚) ∈ ℕ → (𝑚 = 1 ∨ 𝑚 = 𝑛)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 ≈ ℕ
PART 6  BASIC STRUCTURES
6.1  Extensible structures
6.1.1  Basic definitions An "extensible structure" (or "structure" in short, at least in this section) is used to define a specific group, ring, poset, and so on. An extensible structure can contain many components. For example, a group will have at least two components (base set and operation), although it can be further specialized by adding other components such as a multiplicative operation for rings (and still remain a group per our definition). Thus, every ring is also a group. This extensible structure approach allows theorems from more general structures (such as groups) to be reused for more specialized structures (such as rings) without having to reprove anything. Structures are common in mathematics, but in informal (natural language) proofs the details are assumed in ways that we must make explicit. An extensible structure is implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs) on a finite (and not necessarily sequential) subset of ℕ. The function's argument is the index of a structure component (such as 1 for the base set of a group), and its value is the component (such as the base set). By convention, we normally avoid direct reference to the hard-coded numeric index and instead use structure component extractors such as ndxid 13077 and strslfv 13098. Using extractors makes it easier to change numeric indices and also makes the components' purpose clearer. See the comment of basendx 13108 for more details on numeric indices versus the structure component extractors. There are many other possible ways to handle structures. We chose this extensible structure approach because this approach (1) results in simpler notation than other approaches we are aware of, and (2) is easier to do proofs with. We cannot use an approach that uses "hidden" arguments; Metamath does not support hidden arguments, and in any case we want nothing hidden. It would be possible to use a categorical approach (e.g., something vaguely similar to Lean's mathlib). However, instances (the chain of proofs that an 𝑋 is a 𝑌 via a bunch of forgetful functors) can cause serious performance problems for automated tooling, and the resulting proofs would be painful to look at directly (in the case of Lean, they are long past the level where people would find it acceptable to look at them directly). Metamath is working under much stricter conditions than this, and it has still managed to achieve about the same level of flexibility through this "extensible structure" approach. To create a substructure of a given extensible structure, you can simply use the multifunction restriction operator for extensible structures ↾s as defined in df-iress 13061. This can be used to turn statements about rings into statements about subrings, modules into submodules, etc. This definition knows nothing about individual structures and merely truncates the Base set while leaving operators alone. Individual kinds of structures will need to handle this behavior by ignoring operators' values outside the range, defining a function using the base set and applying that, or explicitly truncating the slot before use. Extensible structures only work well when they represent concrete categories, where there is a "base set", morphisms are functions, and subobjects are subsets with induced operations. In short, they primarily work well for "sets with (some) extra structure". Extensible structures may not suffice for more complicated situations. For example, in manifolds, ↾s would not work. That said, extensible structures are sufficient for many of the structures that set.mm currently considers, and offer a good compromise for a goal-oriented formalization.
Syntax	cstr 13049	Extend class notation with the class of structures with components numbered below 𝐴.
class Struct
Syntax	cnx 13050	Extend class notation with the structure component index extractor.
class ndx
Syntax	csts 13051	Set components of a structure.
class sSet
Syntax	cslot 13052	Extend class notation with the slot function.
class Slot 𝐴
Syntax	cbs 13053	Extend class notation with the class of all base set extractors.
class Base
Syntax	cress 13054	Extend class notation with the extensible structure builder restriction operator.
class ↾s
Definition	df-struct 13055*	Define a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. This is not a requirement for groups, posets, etc., but it is a useful assumption for component extraction theorems. As mentioned in the section header, an "extensible structure should be implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs)". The current definition, however, is less restrictive: it allows for classes which contain the empty set ∅ to be extensible structures. Because of 0nelfun 5339, such classes cannot be functions. Without the empty set, however, a structure must be a function, see structn0fun 13066: 𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}). Allowing an extensible structure to contain the empty set ensures that expressions like {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩} are structures without asserting or implying that 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶 and 𝐷 are sets (if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is a proper class, then ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅, see opprc 3878). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Struct = {⟨𝑓, 𝑥⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝑓 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝑓 ⊆ (...‘𝑥))}
Definition	df-ndx 13056	Define the structure component index extractor. See Theorem ndxarg 13076 to understand its purpose. The restriction to ℕ ensures that ndx is a set. The restriction to some set is necessary since I is a proper class. In principle, we could have chosen ℂ or (if we revise all structure component definitions such as df-base 13059) another set such as the set of finite ordinals ω (df-iom 4684). (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ndx = ( I ↾ ℕ)
Definition	df-slot 13057*	Define the slot extractor for extensible structures. The class Slot 𝐴 is a function whose argument can be any set, although it is meaningful only if that set is a member of an extensible structure (such as a partially ordered set or a group). Note that Slot 𝐴 is implemented as "evaluation at 𝐴". That is, (Slot 𝐴‘𝑆) is defined to be (𝑆‘𝐴), where 𝐴 will typically be a small nonzero natural number. Each extensible structure 𝑆 is a function defined on specific natural number "slots", and this function extracts the value at a particular slot. The special "structure" ndx, defined as the identity function restricted to ℕ, can be used to extract the number 𝐴 from a slot, since (Slot 𝐴‘ndx) = 𝐴 (see ndxarg 13076). This is typically used to refer to the number of a slot when defining structures without having to expose the detail of what that number is (for instance, we use the expression (Base‘ndx) in theorems and proofs instead of its value 1). The class Slot cannot be defined as (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓‘𝑥))) because each Slot 𝐴 is a function on the proper class V so is itself a proper class, and the values of functions are sets (fvex 5652). It is necessary to allow proper classes as values of Slot 𝐴 since for instance the class of all (base sets of) groups is proper. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Slot 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥‘𝐴))
Theorem	sloteq 13058	Equality theorem for the Slot construction. The converse holds if 𝐴 (or 𝐵) is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Slot 𝐴 = Slot 𝐵)
Definition	df-base 13059	Define the base set (also called underlying set, ground set, carrier set, or carrier) extractor for extensible structures. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Base = Slot 1
Definition	df-sets 13060*	Set a component of an extensible structure. This function is useful for taking an existing structure and "overriding" one of its components. For example, df-iress 13061 adjusts the base set to match its second argument, which has the effect of making subgroups, subspaces, subrings etc. from the original structures. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.)
⊢ sSet = (𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑠 ↾ (V ∖ dom {𝑒})) ∪ {𝑒}))
Definition	df-iress 13061*	Define a multifunction restriction operator for extensible structures, which can be used to turn statements about rings into statements about subrings, modules into submodules, etc. This definition knows nothing about individual structures and merely truncates the Base set while leaving operators alone; individual kinds of structures will need to handle this behavior, by ignoring operators' values outside the range, defining a function using the base set and applying that, or explicitly truncating the slot before use. (Credit for this operator, as well as the 2023 modification for iset.mm, goes to Mario Carneiro.) (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ↾s = (𝑤 ∈ V, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 sSet ⟨(Base‘ndx), (𝑥 ∩ (Base‘𝑤))⟩))
Theorem	brstruct 13062	The structure relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Rel Struct
Theorem	isstruct2im 13063	The property of being a structure with components in (1st ‘𝑋)...(2nd ‘𝑋). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → (𝑋 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (...‘𝑋)))
Theorem	isstruct2r 13064	The property of being a structure with components in (1st ‘𝑋)...(2nd ‘𝑋). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅})) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (...‘𝑋))) → 𝐹 Struct 𝑋)
Theorem	structex 13065	A structure is a set. (Contributed by AV, 10-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 Struct 𝑋 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
Theorem	structn0fun 13066	A structure without the empty set is a function. (Contributed by AV, 13-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	isstructim 13067	The property of being a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩ → ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁)))
Theorem	isstructr 13068	The property of being a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ∧ (Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁))) → 𝐹 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩)
Theorem	structcnvcnv 13069	Two ways to express the relational part of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → ◡◡𝐹 = (𝐹 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	structfung 13070	The converse of the converse of a structure is a function. Closed form of structfun 13071. (Contributed by AV, 12-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun ◡◡𝐹)
Theorem	structfun 13071	Convert between two kinds of structure closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 Struct 𝑋    ⇒   ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝐹
Theorem	structfn 13072	Convert between two kinds of structure closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (1...𝑁))
Theorem	strnfvnd 13073	Deduction version of strnfvn 13074. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝑆‘𝑁))
Theorem	strnfvn 13074	Value of a structure component extractor 𝐸. Normally, 𝐸 is a defined constant symbol such as Base (df-base 13059) and 𝑁 is a fixed integer such as 1. 𝑆 is a structure, i.e. a specific member of a class of structures. Note: Normally, this theorem shouldn't be used outside of this section, because it requires hard-coded index values. Instead, use strslfv 13098. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝑆‘𝑁)
Theorem	strfvssn 13075	A structure component extractor produces a value which is contained in a set dependent on 𝑆, but not 𝐸. This is sometimes useful for showing sethood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑆) ⊆ ∪ ran 𝑆)
Theorem	ndxarg 13076	Get the numeric argument from a defined structure component extractor such as df-base 13059. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) = 𝑁
Theorem	ndxid 13077	A structure component extractor is defined by its own index. This theorem, together with strslfv 13098 below, is useful for avoiding direct reference to the hard-coded numeric index in component extractor definitions, such as the 1 in df-base 13059, making it easier to change should the need arise. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)
Theorem	ndxslid 13078	A structure component extractor is defined by its own index. That the index is a natural number will also be needed in quite a few contexts so it is included in the conclusion of this theorem which can be used as a hypothesis of theorems like strslfv 13098. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	slotslfn 13079	A slot is a function on sets, treated as structures. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 Fn V
Theorem	slotex 13080	Existence of slot value. A corollary of slotslfn 13079. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐸‘𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	strndxid 13081	The value of a structure component extractor is the value of the corresponding slot of the structure. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘(𝐸‘ndx)) = (𝐸‘𝑆))
Theorem	reldmsets 13082	The structure override operator is a proper operator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ Rel dom sSet
Theorem	setsvalg 13083	Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet 𝐴) = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ dom {𝐴})) ∪ {𝐴}))
Theorem	setsvala 13084	Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
Theorem	setsex 13085	Applying the structure replacement function yields a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ∈ V)
Theorem	strsetsid 13086	Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ dom 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (𝑆 sSet ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), (𝐸‘𝑆)⟩))
Theorem	fvsetsid 13087	The value of the structure replacement function for its first argument is its second argument. (Contributed by SO, 12-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) → ((𝐹 sSet ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)‘𝑋) = 𝑌)
Theorem	setsfun 13088	A structure with replacement is a function if the original structure is a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → Fun (𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩))
Theorem	setsfun0 13089	A structure with replacement without the empty set is a function if the original structure without the empty set is a function. This variant of setsfun 13088 is useful for proofs based on isstruct2r 13064 which requires Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) for 𝐹 to be an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun (𝐺 ∖ {∅})) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → Fun ((𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	setsn0fun 13090	The value of the structure replacement function (without the empty set) is a function if the structure (without the empty set) is a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.) (Revised by AV, 16-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Struct 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	setsresg 13091	The structure replacement function does not affect the value of 𝑆 away from 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})) = (𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})))
Theorem	setsabsd 13092	Replacing the same components twice yields the same as the second setting only. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) = (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	setscom 13093	Different components can be set in any order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) = ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	setscomd 13094	Different components can be set in any order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) = ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	strslfvd 13095	Deduction version of strslfv 13098. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))
Theorem	strslfv2d 13096	Deduction version of strslfv 13098. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ◡◡𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))
Theorem	strslfv2 13097	A variation on strslfv 13098 to avoid asserting that 𝑆 itself is a function, which involves sethood of all the ordered pair components of 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆    &   ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))
Theorem	strslfv 13098	Extract a structure component 𝐶 (such as the base set) from a structure 𝑆 with a component extractor 𝐸 (such as the base set extractor df-base 13059). By virtue of ndxslid 13078, this can be done without having to refer to the hard-coded numeric index of 𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝑆 Struct 𝑋    &   ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ {⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩} ⊆ 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))
Theorem	strslfv3 13099	Variant on strslfv 13098 for large structures. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Struct 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩} ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)
Theorem	strslssd 13100	Deduction version of strslss 13101. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑇) = (𝐸‘𝑆))