| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 84 of 169) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Syntax | cpnf 8301 | Plus infinity. |
| class +∞ | ||
| Syntax | cmnf 8302 | Minus infinity. |
| class -∞ | ||
| Syntax | cxr 8303 | The set of extended reals (includes plus and minus infinity). |
| class ℝ* | ||
| Syntax | clt 8304 | 'Less than' predicate (extended to include the extended reals). |
| class < | ||
| Syntax | cle 8305 | Extend wff notation to include the 'less than or equal to' relation. |
| class ≤ | ||
| Definition | df-pnf 8306 |
Define plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring
only that +∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from -∞
(df-mnf 8307). We use 𝒫 ∪ ℂ to make it independent of the
construction of ℂ, and Cantor's Theorem will
show that it is
different from any member of ℂ and therefore
ℝ. See pnfnre 8311
and mnfnre 8312, and we'll also be able to prove +∞ ≠ -∞.
A simpler possibility is to define +∞ as ℂ and -∞ as {ℂ}, but that approach requires the Axiom of Regularity to show that +∞ and -∞ are different from each other and from all members of ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ +∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ | ||
| Definition | df-mnf 8307 | Define minus infinity as the power set of plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that -∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from +∞ (see mnfnre 8312). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ -∞ = 𝒫 +∞ | ||
| Definition | df-xr 8308 | Define the set of extended reals that includes plus and minus infinity. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ℝ* = (ℝ ∪ {+∞, -∞}) | ||
| Definition | df-ltxr 8309* | Define 'less than' on the set of extended reals. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. Note that in our postulates for complex numbers, <ℝ is primitive and not necessarily a relation on ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ < = ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦)} ∪ (((ℝ ∪ {-∞}) × {+∞}) ∪ ({-∞} × ℝ))) | ||
| Definition | df-le 8310 | Define 'less than or equal to' on the extended real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = ((ℝ* × ℝ*) ∖ ◡ < ) | ||
| Theorem | pnfnre 8311 | Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ∉ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | mnfnre 8312 | Minus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ -∞ ∉ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | ressxr 8313 | The standard reals are a subset of the extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℝ* | ||
| Theorem | rexpssxrxp 8314 | The Cartesian product of standard reals are a subset of the Cartesian product of extended reals (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*) | ||
| Theorem | rexr 8315 | A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) | ||
| Theorem | 0xr 8316 | Zero is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ* | ||
| Theorem | renepnf 8317 | No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ +∞) | ||
| Theorem | renemnf 8318 | No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ -∞) | ||
| Theorem | rexrd 8319 | A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) | ||
| Theorem | renepnfd 8320 | No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ +∞) | ||
| Theorem | renemnfd 8321 | No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ -∞) | ||
| Theorem | pnfxr 8322 | Plus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ∈ ℝ* | ||
| Theorem | pnfex 8323 | Plus infinity exists (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | pnfnemnf 8324 | Plus and minus infinity are different elements of ℝ*. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞ | ||
| Theorem | mnfnepnf 8325 | Minus and plus infinity are different (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ -∞ ≠ +∞ | ||
| Theorem | mnfxr 8326 | Minus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ -∞ ∈ ℝ* | ||
| Theorem | rexri 8327 | A standard real is an extended real (inference form.) (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ* | ||
| Theorem | 1xr 8328 | 1 is an extended real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ* | ||
| Theorem | renfdisj 8329 | The reals and the infinities are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (ℝ ∩ {+∞, -∞}) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | ltrelxr 8330 | 'Less than' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ < ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*) | ||
| Theorem | ltrel 8331 | 'Less than' is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ Rel < | ||
| Theorem | lerelxr 8332 | 'Less than or equal' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ≤ ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*) | ||
| Theorem | lerel 8333 | 'Less or equal to' is a relation. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel ≤ | ||
| Theorem | xrlenlt 8334 | 'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than', for extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltxrlt 8335 | The standard less-than <ℝ and the extended real less-than < are identical when restricted to the non-extended reals ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | axltirr 8336 | Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltirr 8235 with ordering on the extended reals. New proofs should use ltnr 8346 instead for naming consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | axltwlin 8337 | Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltwlin 8236 with ordering on the extended reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → (𝐴 < 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 < 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | axlttrn 8338 | Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-lttrn 8237 with ordering on the extended reals. New proofs should use lttr 8343 instead for naming consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | axltadd 8339 | Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-ltadd 8239 with ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | axapti 8340 | Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-apti 8238 with ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | axmulgt0 8341 | The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. (This restates ax-pre-mulgt0 8240 with ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | axsuploc 8342* | An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. (This restates ax-pre-suploc 8244 with ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | lttr 8343 | Alias for axlttrn 8338, for naming consistency with lttri 8374. New proofs should generally use this instead of ax-pre-lttrn 8237. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mulgt0 8344 | The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐵)) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | lenlt 8345 | 'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than'. Part of definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltnr 8346 | 'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltso 8347 | 'Less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ < Or ℝ | ||
| Theorem | gtso 8348 | 'Greater than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by JJ, 11-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ◡ < Or ℝ | ||
| Theorem | lttri3 8349 | Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | letri3 8350 | Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | ltleletr 8351 | Transitive law, weaker form of (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | letr 8352 | Transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | leid 8353 | 'Less than or equal to' is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltne 8354 | 'Less than' implies not equal. See also ltap 8903 which is the same but for apartness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltnsym 8355 | 'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | eqlelt 8356 | Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ltle 8357 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | lelttr 8358 | Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ltletr 8359 | Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ltnsym2 8360 | 'Less than' is antisymmetric and irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | eqle 8361 | Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltnri 8362 | 'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | eqlei 8363 | Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | eqlei2 8364 | Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | gtneii 8365 | 'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapii 8904 which is the same for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ltneii 8366 | 'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | lttri3i 8367 | Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | letri3i 8368 | Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltnsymi 8369 | 'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | lenlti 8370 | 'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltlei 8371 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltleii 8372 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to' (inference). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | ltnei 8373 | 'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | lttri 8374 | 'Less than' is transitive. Theorem I.17 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | lelttri 8375 | 'Less than or equal to', 'less than' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | ltletri 8376 | 'Less than', 'less than or equal to' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | letri 8377 | 'Less than or equal to' is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | le2tri3i 8378 | Extended trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2000.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mulgt0i 8379 | The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mulgt0ii 8380 | The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐴 & ⊢ 0 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltnrd 8381 | 'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | gtned 8382 | 'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapd 8907 which is the same but for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ltned 8383 | 'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lttri3d 8384 | Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | letri3d 8385 | Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | eqleltd 8386 | Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | lenltd 8387 | 'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ltled 8388 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltnsymd 8389 | 'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nltled 8390 | 'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lensymd 8391 | 'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mulgt0d 8392 | The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | letrd 8393 | Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | lelttrd 8394 | Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | lttrd 8395 | Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | 0lt1 8396 | 0 is less than 1. Theorem I.21 of [Apostol] p. 20. Part of definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ 0 < 1 | ||
| Theorem | ltntri 8397 | Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no, as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mul12 8398 | Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | mul32 8399 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mul31 8400 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |