P. 82 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8101-8200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ltleletr 8101	Transitive law, weaker form of (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶))
Theorem	letr 8102	Transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶))
Theorem	leid 8103	'Less than or equal to' is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	ltne 8104	'Less than' implies not equal. See also ltap 8652 which is the same but for apartness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	ltnsym 8105	'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	eqlelt 8106	Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltle 8107	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	lelttr 8108	Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶))
Theorem	ltletr 8109	Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶))
Theorem	ltnsym2 8110	'Less than' is antisymmetric and irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	eqle 8111	Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	ltnri 8112	'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴
Theorem	eqlei 8113	Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqlei2 8114	Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	gtneii 8115	'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapii 8653 which is the same for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴
Theorem	ltneii 8116	'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Theorem	lttri3i 8117	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	letri3i 8118	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
Theorem	ltnsymi 8119	'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	lenlti 8120	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	ltlei 8121	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	ltleii 8122	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to' (inference). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵
Theorem	ltnei 8123	'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	lttri 8124	'Less than' is transitive. Theorem I.17 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	lelttri 8125	'Less than or equal to', 'less than' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	ltletri 8126	'Less than', 'less than or equal to' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	letri 8127	'Less than or equal to' is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)
Theorem	le2tri3i 8128	Extended trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2000.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐴))
Theorem	mulgt0i 8129	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((0 < 𝐴 ∧ 0 < 𝐵) → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	mulgt0ii 8130	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐴    &   ⊢ 0 < 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)
Theorem	ltnrd 8131	'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐴)
Theorem	gtned 8132	'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapd 8656 which is the same but for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	ltned 8133	'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	lttri3d 8134	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	letri3d 8135	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	eqleltd 8136	Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵)))
Theorem	lenltd 8137	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	ltled 8138	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	ltnsymd 8139	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	nltled 8140	'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	lensymd 8141	'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	mulgt0d 8142	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	letrd 8143	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)
Theorem	lelttrd 8144	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	lttrd 8145	Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	0lt1 8146	0 is less than 1. Theorem I.21 of [Apostol] p. 20. Part of definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 0 < 1
Theorem	ltntri 8147	Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no, as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
4.2.5  Initial properties of the complex numbers
Theorem	mul12 8148	Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	mul32 8149	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵))
Theorem	mul31 8150	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴))
Theorem	mul4 8151	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)))
Theorem	muladd11 8152	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵))))
Theorem	1p1times 8153	Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) · 𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴))
Theorem	peano2cn 8154	A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4627. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	peano2re 8155	A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4627. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	addcom 8156	Addition commutes. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	addrid 8157	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addlid 8158	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	readdcan 8159	Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐴) = (𝐶 + 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	00id 8160	0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (0 + 0) = 0
Theorem	addid1i 8161	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴
Theorem	addid2i 8162	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	addcomi 8163	Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)
Theorem	addcomli 8164	Addition commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶
Theorem	mul12i 8165	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))
Theorem	mul32i 8166	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)
Theorem	mul4i 8167	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))
Theorem	addridd 8168	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addlidd 8169	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addcomd 8170	Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	mul12d 8171	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	mul32d 8172	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵))
Theorem	mul31d 8173	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴))
Theorem	mul4d 8174	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)))
Theorem	muladd11r 8175	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 1) · (𝐵 + 1)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 + 𝐵)) + 1))
Theorem	comraddd 8176	Commute RHS addition, in deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵))
4.3  Real and complex numbers - basic operations
4.3.1  Addition
Theorem	add12 8177	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	add32 8178	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	add32r 8179	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum, rearranging the parentheses. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	add4 8180	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)))
Theorem	add42 8181	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2005.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	add12i 8182	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))
Theorem	add32i 8183	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)
Theorem	add4i 8184	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))
Theorem	add42i 8185	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))
Theorem	add12d 8186	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	add32d 8187	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	add4d 8188	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)))
Theorem	add42d 8189	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)))
4.3.2  Subtraction
Syntax	cmin 8190	Extend class notation to include subtraction.
class −
Syntax	cneg 8191	Extend class notation to include unary minus. The symbol - is not a class by itself but part of a compound class definition. We do this rather than making it a formal function since it is so commonly used. Note: We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction cmin 8190 (−) to prevent syntax ambiguity. For example, looking at the syntax definition co 5918, if we used the same symbol then "( − 𝐴 − 𝐵) " could mean either "− 𝐴 " minus "𝐵", or it could represent the (meaningless) operation of classes "− " and "− 𝐵 " connected with "operation" "𝐴". On the other hand, "(-𝐴 − 𝐵) " is unambiguous.
class -𝐴
Definition	df-sub 8192*	Define subtraction. Theorem subval 8211 shows its value (and describes how this definition works), Theorem subaddi 8306 relates it to addition, and Theorems subcli 8295 and resubcli 8282 prove its closure laws. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1994.)
⊢ − = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝑦 + 𝑧) = 𝑥))
Definition	df-neg 8193	Define the negative of a number (unary minus). We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction (−) to prevent syntax ambiguity. See cneg 8191 for a discussion of this. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
⊢ -𝐴 = (0 − 𝐴)
Theorem	cnegexlem1 8194	Addition cancellation of a real number from two complex numbers. Lemma for cnegex 8197. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	cnegexlem2 8195	Existence of a real number which produces a real number when multiplied by i. (Hint: zero is such a number, although we don't need to prove that yet). Lemma for cnegex 8197. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ (i · 𝑦) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	cnegexlem3 8196*	Existence of real number difference. Lemma for cnegex 8197. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ (𝑏 + 𝑐) = 𝑦)
Theorem	cnegex 8197*	Existence of the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	cnegex2 8198*	Existence of a left inverse for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	addcan 8199	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	addcan2 8200	Cancellation law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))