| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 65 of 170) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | fnmpoi 6401* | Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmmpo 6402* | Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mpofvex 6403* | Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑅𝐹𝑆) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mpofvexi 6404* | Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅𝐹𝑆) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | ovmpoelrn 6405* | An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌) ∈ 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | dmmpoga 6406* | Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6402. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dmmpog 6407* | Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6402. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the very special case where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexxg 6408* | Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexg 6409* | Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexga 6410* | If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexw 6411* | Weak version of mpoex 6412 that holds without ax-coll 4227. If the domain and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | mpoex 6412* | If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | fnmpoovd 6413* | A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑏) → 𝐷 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖𝑀𝑗) = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | fmpoco 6414* | Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 5845 when the second function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑅 → 𝑆 = 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | oprabco 6415* | Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 Fn 𝐷 → 𝐺 = (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | oprab2co 6416* | Composition of operator abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 23-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶𝑀𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 Fn (𝑅 × 𝑆) → 𝐺 = (𝑀 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | df1st2 6417* | An alternate possible definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥} = (1st ↾ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | df2nd2 6418* | An alternate possible definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦} = (2nd ↾ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | 1stconst 6419 | The mapping of a restriction of the 1st function to a constant function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × {𝐵})):(𝐴 × {𝐵})–1-1-onto→𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 2ndconst 6420 | The mapping of a restriction of the 2nd function to a converse constant function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ↾ ({𝐴} × 𝐵)):({𝐴} × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfmpo 6421* | Alternate definition for the maps-to notation df-mpo 6057 (although it requires that 𝐶 be a set). (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝐶〉} | ||
| Theorem | cnvf1olem 6422 | Lemma for cnvf1o 6423. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ◡{𝐵})) → (𝐶 ∈ ◡𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = ∪ ◡{𝐶})) | ||
| Theorem | cnvf1o 6423* | Describe a function that maps the elements of a set to its converse bijectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}):𝐴–1-1-onto→◡𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | f2ndf 6424 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 into the codomain of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fo2ndf 6425 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–onto→ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | f1o2ndf1 6426 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a one-to-one function 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1-onto→ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | algrflem 6427 | Lemma for algrf and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | algrflemg 6428 | Lemma for algrf 12750 and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xporderlem 6429* | Lemma for lexicographical ordering theorems. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉𝑇〈𝑐, 𝑑〉 ↔ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑎𝑅𝑐 ∨ (𝑎 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑆𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | poxp 6430* | A lexicographical ordering of two posets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | spc2ed 6431* | Existential specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvoprab 6432* | The converse of a class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑎 ∈ (V × V)) ⇒ ⊢ ◡{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑧, 𝑎〉 ∣ 𝜓} | ||
| Theorem | f1od2 6433* | Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function of two variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐽)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | disjxp1 6434* | The sets of a cartesian product are disjoint if the sets in the first argument are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | disjsnxp 6435* | The sets in the cartesian product of singletons with other sets, are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ Disj 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑗} × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elmpom 6436* | If a maps-to operation is inhabited, the first class it is defined with is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Mar-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝐹 → ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
In this section, the support of functions is defined and corresponding theorems are provided. Since basic properties (see suppval 6439) are based on the Axiom of Union (usage of dmexg 5023), these definition and theorems cannot be provided earlier. Until April 2019, the support of a function was represented by the expression (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) (see suppimacnvfn 6448). The theorems which are based on this representation and which are provided in previous sections could be moved into this section to have all related theorems in one section, although they do not depend on the Axiom of Union. This was possible because they are not used before. The current theorems differ from the original ones by requiring that the classes representing the "function" (or its "domain") and the "zero element" are sets. Actually, this does not cause any problem (until now). | ||
| Syntax | csupp 6437 | Extend class definition to include the support of functions. |
| class supp | ||
| Definition | df-supp 6438* | Define the support of a function against a "zero" value. The support of a function is the subset of its domain which is mapped to a value which is not equal to a designed value called the zero value. Note that this definition uses not equal rather than being in terms of an apartness relation (df-ap 8861 or any other apartness relation), and thus is sometimes called "support" rather than "strong support". It is therefore probably most useful when the function has a codomain which has decidable equality and contains the zero value. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}}) | ||
| Theorem | suppval 6439* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}}) | ||
| Theorem | supp0 6440 | The support of the empty set is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅ supp 𝑍) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | suppval1 6441* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | suppvalfng 6442* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function with a given domain. This version of suppvalfn 6443 assumes 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝑋, avoiding ax-coll 4227. (Contributed by SN, 5-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | suppvalfn 6443* | The value of the operation constructing the support of a function with a given domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 22-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑖) ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | elsuppfng 6444 | An element of the support of a function with a given domain. This version of elsuppfn 6445 assumes 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝑋, avoiding ax-coll 4227. (Contributed by SN, 5-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≠ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | elsuppfn 6445 | An element of the support of a function with a given domain. (Contributed by AV, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≠ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | fvdifsuppst 6446* | Function value is zero outside of its support. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 STAB 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | cnvimadfsn 6447* | The support of functions "defined" by inverse images expressed by binary relations. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝑅 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍)} | ||
| Theorem | suppimacnvfn 6448 | Support sets of functions expressed by inverse images. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ {𝑍}))) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppeq 6449 | Two ways of writing the support of a function with known codomain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})))) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppeqg 6450 | Version of fsuppeq 6449 avoiding ax-coll 4227 by assuming 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝐼. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})))) | ||
| Theorem | suppssdmg 6451 | The support of a function is a subset of the function's domain. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | suppsnopdc 6452 | The support of a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑋, 𝑌〉} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝑌 = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = if(𝑌 = 𝑍, ∅, {𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | fvn0elsupp 6453 | If the function value for a given argument is not empty, the argument belongs to the support of the function with the empty set as zero. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑋) ≠ ∅)) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | fvn0elsuppb 6454 | The function value for a given argument is not empty iff the argument belongs to the support of the function with the empty set as zero. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐺‘𝑋) ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | rexsupp 6455* | Existential quantification restricted to a support. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | ressuppss 6456 | The support of the restriction of a function is a subset of the support of the function itself. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | mptsuppdifd 6457* | The support of a function in maps-to notation with a class difference. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ (V ∖ {𝑍})}) | ||
| Theorem | mptsuppd 6458* | The support of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑍}) | ||
| Theorem | suppfnss 6459* | The support of a function which has the same zero values (in its domain) as another function is a subset of the support of this other function. (Contributed by AV, 30-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 6-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝑍 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑍) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | funsssuppss 6460 | The support of a function which is a subset of another function is a subset of the support of this other function. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | fczsupp0 6461 | The support of a constant function with value zero is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 × {𝑍}) supp 𝑍) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | suppssdc 6462* | Show that the support of a function is contained in a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | suppssrst 6463* | A function is zero outside its support. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 STAB 𝑢 = 𝑣) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | suppssrgst 6464* | A function is zero outside its support. Version of suppssrst 6463 avoiding ax-coll 4227 by assuming 𝐹 is a set rather than its domain 𝐴. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 STAB 𝑢 = 𝑣) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | suppssfvg 6465* | Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐴) supp 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑌) = 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐹‘𝐴)) supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐿) | ||
| Theorem | suppofss1dcl 6466* | Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the support of the left function term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑢𝑋𝑣) ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑍𝑋𝑥) = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐹 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | suppofss2dcl 6467* | Condition for the support of a function operation to be a subset of the support of the right function term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑢𝑋𝑣) ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑋𝑍) = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑋𝐺) supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | suppcofn 6468 | The support of the composition of two functions is the inverse image by the inner function of the support of the outer function. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) (Revised by SN, 15-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) = (◡𝐺 “ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | supp0cosupp0fn 6469 | The support of the composition of two functions is empty if the support of the outer function is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺)) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = ∅ → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | imacosuppfn 6470 | The image of the support of the composition of two functions is the support of the outer function. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺)) → ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ ran 𝐺) → (𝐺 “ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍)) = (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) | ||
The following theorems are about maps-to operations (see df-mpo 6057) where the domain of the second argument depends on the domain of the first argument, especially when the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, in short "x-maps-to operations". For labels, the abbreviations "mpox" are used (since "x" usually denotes the first argument). This is in line with the currently used conventions for such cases (see cbvmpox 6133, ovmpox 6184 and fmpox 6398). If the first argument is an ordered pair, as in the following, the abbreviation is extended to "mpoxop", and the maps-to operations are called "x-op maps-to operations" for short. | ||
| Theorem | opeliunxp2f 6471* | Membership in a union of Cartesian products, using bound-variable hypothesis for 𝐸 instead of distinct variable conditions as in opeliunxp2 4897. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐸 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopn0yelv 6472* | If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, then the second argument is an element of the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopoveq 6473* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopovel 6474* | Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | rbropapd 6475* | Properties of a pair in an extended binary relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒)))) | ||
| Theorem | rbropap 6476* | Properties of a pair in a restricted binary relation 𝑀 expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction: 𝑀 is the binary relation 𝑊 restricted by the condition 𝜓. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Syntax | ctpos 6477 | The transposition of a function. |
| class tpos 𝐹 | ||
| Definition | df-tpos 6478* | Define the transposition of a function, which is a function 𝐺 = tpos 𝐹 satisfying 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | tposss 6479 | Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tposeq 6480 | Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tposeqd 6481 | Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tposssxp 6482 | The transposition is a subset of a cross product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) × ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | reltpos 6483 | The transposition is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | brtpos2 6484 | Value of the transposition at a pair 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ∧ ∪ ◡{𝐴}𝐹𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | brtpos0 6485 | The behavior of tpos when the left argument is the empty set (which is not an ordered pair but is the "default" value of an ordered pair when the arguments are proper classes). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅tpos 𝐹𝐴 ↔ ∅𝐹𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | reldmtpos 6486 | Necessary and sufficient condition for dom tpos 𝐹 to be a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | brtposg 6487 | The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉𝐹𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ottposg 6488 | The transposition swaps the first two elements in a collection of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | dmtpos 6489 | The domain of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | rntpos 6490 | The range of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → ran tpos 𝐹 = ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tposexg 6491 | The transposition of a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → tpos 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | ovtposg 6492 | The transposition swaps the arguments in a two-argument function. When 𝐹 is a matrix, which is to say a function from ( 1 ... m ) × ( 1 ... n ) to the reals or some ring, tpos 𝐹 is the transposition of 𝐹, which is where the name comes from. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tposfun 6493 | The transposition of a function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun tpos 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos2 6494* | Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos3 6495* | Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 4759. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 〈𝑦, 𝑥〉𝐹𝑧}) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos4 6496* | Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ((V × V) ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | tpostpos 6497 | Value of the double transposition for a general class 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∩ (((V × V) ∪ {∅}) × V)) | ||
| Theorem | tpostpos2 6498 | Value of the double transposition for a relation on triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom 𝐹) → tpos tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tposfn2 6499 | The domain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → tpos 𝐹 Fn ◡𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tposfo2 6500 | Condition for a surjective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–onto→𝐵)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |