P. 110 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 10901-11000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	gcdadd 10901	The GCD of two numbers is the same as the GCD of the left and their sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M gcd N ) = ( M gcd ( N + M ) ) )
Theorem	gcdid 10902	The gcd of a number and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- ( N e. ZZ -> ( N gcd N ) = ( abs ` N ) )
Theorem	gcd1 10903	The gcd of a number with 1 is 1. Theorem 1.4(d)1 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M gcd 1 ) = 1 )
Theorem	gcdabs 10904	The gcd of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( abs ` M ) gcd ( abs ` N ) ) = ( M gcd N ) )
Theorem	gcdabs1 10905	gcd of the absolute value of the first operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( N e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ ) -> ( ( abs ` N ) gcd M ) = ( N gcd M ) )
Theorem	gcdabs2 10906	gcd of the absolute value of the second operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( N e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ ) -> ( N gcd ( abs ` M ) ) = ( N gcd M ) )
Theorem	modgcd 10907	The gcd remains unchanged if one operand is replaced with its remainder modulo the other. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( M mod N ) gcd N ) = ( M gcd N ) )
Theorem	1gcd 10908	The GCD of one and an integer is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( 1 gcd M ) = 1 )
Theorem	6gcd4e2 10909	The greatest common divisor of six and four is two. To calculate this gcd, a simple form of Euclid's algorithm is used: ( 6 gcd 4 ) = ( ( 4 + 2 ) gcd 4 ) = ( 2 gcd 4 ) and ( 2 gcd 4 ) = ( 2 gcd ( 2 + 2 ) ) = ( 2 gcd 2 ) = 2. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( 6 gcd 4 ) = 2
4.1.5  Bézout's identity
Theorem	bezoutlemnewy 10910*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. The is-bezout predicate holds for ( y mod W ). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph <-> E. s e. ZZ E. t e. ZZ r = ( ( A x. s ) + ( B x. t ) ) )   &    |- ( th -> A e. NN0 )   &    |- ( th -> B e. NN0 )   &    |- ( th -> W e. NN )   &    |- ( th -> [ y / r ] ph )   &    |- ( th -> y e. NN0 )   &    |- ( th -> [. W / r ]. ph )   =>    |- ( th -> [. ( y mod W ) / r ]. ph )
Theorem	bezoutlemstep 10911*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. This is the induction step for the proof by induction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph <-> E. s e. ZZ E. t e. ZZ r = ( ( A x. s ) + ( B x. t ) ) )   &    |- ( th -> A e. NN0 )   &    |- ( th -> B e. NN0 )   &    |- ( th -> W e. NN )   &    |- ( th -> [ y / r ] ph )   &    |- ( th -> y e. NN0 )   &    |- ( th -> [. W / r ]. ph )   &    |- ( ps <-> A. z e. NN0 ( z || r -> ( z || x /\ z || y ) ) )   &    |- ( ( th /\ [. ( y mod W ) / r ]. ph ) -> E. r e. NN0 ( [. ( y mod W ) / x ]. [. W / y ]. ps /\ ph ) )   &    |- F/ x th   &    |- F/ r th   =>    |- ( th -> E. r e. NN0 ( [. W / x ]. ps /\ ph ) )
Theorem	bezoutlemmain 10912*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. This is the main result which we prove by induction and which represents the application of the Extended Euclidean algorithm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2021.)
|- ( ph <-> E. s e. ZZ E. t e. ZZ r = ( ( A x. s ) + ( B x. t ) ) )   &    |- ( ps <-> A. z e. NN0 ( z || r -> ( z || x /\ z || y ) ) )   &    |- ( th -> A e. NN0 )   &    |- ( th -> B e. NN0 )   =>    |- ( th -> A. x e. NN0 ( [ x / r ] ph -> A. y e. NN0 ( [ y / r ] ph -> E. r e. NN0 ( ps /\ ph ) ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutlema 10913*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. The is-bezout condition is satisfied by A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2021.)
|- ( ph <-> E. s e. ZZ E. t e. ZZ r = ( ( A x. s ) + ( B x. t ) ) )   &    |- ( th -> A e. NN0 )   &    |- ( th -> B e. NN0 )   =>    |- ( th -> [. A / r ]. ph )
Theorem	bezoutlemb 10914*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. The is-bezout condition is satisfied by B. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2021.)
|- ( ph <-> E. s e. ZZ E. t e. ZZ r = ( ( A x. s ) + ( B x. t ) ) )   &    |- ( th -> A e. NN0 )   &    |- ( th -> B e. NN0 )   =>    |- ( th -> [. B / r ]. ph )
Theorem	bezoutlemex 10915*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. Existence of a number which we will later show to be the greater common divisor and its decomposition into cofactors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. NN0 /\ B e. NN0 ) -> E. d e. NN0 ( A. z e. NN0 ( z || d -> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) /\ E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ d = ( ( A x. x ) + ( B x. y ) ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutlemzz 10916*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. Like bezoutlemex 10915 but where ' z ' is any integer, not just a nonnegative one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. NN0 /\ B e. NN0 ) -> E. d e. NN0 ( A. z e. ZZ ( z || d -> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) /\ E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ d = ( ( A x. x ) + ( B x. y ) ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutlemaz 10917*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. Like bezoutlemzz 10916 but where ' A ' can be any integer, not just a nonnegative one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. NN0 ) -> E. d e. NN0 ( A. z e. ZZ ( z || d -> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) /\ E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ d = ( ( A x. x ) + ( B x. y ) ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutlembz 10918*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. Like bezoutlemaz 10917 but where ' B ' can be any integer, not just a nonnegative one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) -> E. d e. NN0 ( A. z e. ZZ ( z || d -> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) /\ E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ d = ( ( A x. x ) + ( B x. y ) ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutlembi 10919*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. Like bezoutlembz 10918 but the greatest common divisor condition is a biconditional, not just an implication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) -> E. d e. NN0 ( A. z e. ZZ ( z || d <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) /\ E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ d = ( ( A x. x ) + ( B x. y ) ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutlemmo 10920*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. There is at most one nonnegative integer meeting the greatest common divisor condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || D <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || E <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> D = E )
Theorem	bezoutlemeu 10921*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. There is exactly one nonnegative integer meeting the greatest common divisor condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || D <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E! d e. NN0 A. z e. ZZ ( z || d <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutlemle 10922*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. The number satisfying the greatest common divisor condition is the largest number which divides both A and B. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || D <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> -. ( A = 0 /\ B = 0 ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( ( z || A /\ z || B ) -> z <_ D ) )
Theorem	bezoutlemsup 10923*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. The number satisfying the greatest common divisor condition is the supremum of divisors of both A and B. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || D <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> -. ( A = 0 /\ B = 0 ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> D = sup ( { z e. ZZ | ( z || A /\ z || B ) } , RR , < ) )
Theorem	dfgcd3 10924*	Alternate definition of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2021.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M gcd N ) = ( iota_ d e. NN0 A. z e. ZZ ( z || d <-> ( z || M /\ z || N ) ) ) )
Theorem	bezout 10925*	Bézout's identity: For any integers A and B, there are integers x , y such that ( A gcd B ) = A x. x + B x. y. This is Metamath 100 proof #60. The proof is constructive, in the sense that it applies the Extended Euclidian Algorithm to constuct a number which can be shown to be ( A gcd B ) and which satisfies the rest of the theorem. In the presence of excluded middle, it is common to prove Bézout's identity by taking the smallest number which satisfies the Bézout condition, and showing it is the greatest common divisor. But we do not have the ability to show that number exists other than by providing a way to determine it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) -> E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ ( A gcd B ) = ( ( A x. x ) + ( B x. y ) ) )
Theorem	dvdsgcd 10926	An integer which divides each of two others also divides their gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K || M /\ K || N ) -> K || ( M gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	dvdsgcdb 10927	Biconditional form of dvdsgcd 10926. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K || M /\ K || N ) <-> K || ( M gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	dfgcd2 10928*	Alternate definition of the gcd operator, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 15. (Contributed by AV, 8-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( D = ( M gcd N ) <-> ( 0 <_ D /\ ( D || M /\ D || N ) /\ A. e e. ZZ ( ( e || M /\ e || N ) -> e || D ) ) ) )
Theorem	gcdass 10929	Associative law for gcd operator. Theorem 1.4(b) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( N e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ P e. ZZ ) -> ( ( N gcd M ) gcd P ) = ( N gcd ( M gcd P ) ) )
Theorem	mulgcd 10930	Distribute multiplication by a nonnegative integer over gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- ( ( K e. NN0 /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K x. M ) gcd ( K x. N ) ) = ( K x. ( M gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	absmulgcd 10931	Distribute absolute value of multiplication over gcd. Theorem 1.4(c) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K x. M ) gcd ( K x. N ) ) = ( abs ` ( K x. ( M gcd N ) ) ) )
Theorem	mulgcdr 10932	Reverse distribution law for the gcd operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ C e. NN0 ) -> ( ( A x. C ) gcd ( B x. C ) ) = ( ( A gcd B ) x. C ) )
Theorem	gcddiv 10933	Division law for GCD. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ C e. NN ) /\ ( C || A /\ C || B ) ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) / C ) = ( ( A / C ) gcd ( B / C ) ) )
Theorem	gcdmultiple 10934	The GCD of a multiple of a number is the number itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( M gcd ( M x. N ) ) = M )
Theorem	gcdmultiplez 10935	Extend gcdmultiple 10934 so N can be an integer. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M gcd ( M x. N ) ) = M )
Theorem	gcdzeq 10936	A positive integer A is equal to its gcd with an integer B if and only if A divides B. Generalization of gcdeq 10937. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. ZZ ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) = A <-> A || B ) )
Theorem	gcdeq 10937	A is equal to its gcd with B if and only if A divides B. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) = A <-> A || B ) )
Theorem	dvdssqim 10938	Unidirectional form of dvdssq 10945. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M || N -> ( M ^ 2 ) || ( N ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	dvdsmulgcd 10939	Relationship between the order of an element and that of a multiple. (a divisibility equivalent). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( B e. ZZ /\ C e. ZZ ) -> ( A || ( B x. C ) <-> A || ( B x. ( C gcd A ) ) ) )
Theorem	rpmulgcd 10940	If K and M are relatively prime, then the GCD of K and M x. N is the GCD of K and N. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( ( K e. NN /\ M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) /\ ( K gcd M ) = 1 ) -> ( K gcd ( M x. N ) ) = ( K gcd N ) )
Theorem	rplpwr 10941	If A and B are relatively prime, then so are A ^ N and B. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) = 1 -> ( ( A ^ N ) gcd B ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	rppwr 10942	If A and B are relatively prime, then so are A ^ N and B ^ N. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) = 1 -> ( ( A ^ N ) gcd ( B ^ N ) ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	sqgcd 10943	Square distributes over GCD. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( M gcd N ) ^ 2 ) = ( ( M ^ 2 ) gcd ( N ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	dvdssqlem 10944	Lemma for dvdssq 10945. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( M || N <-> ( M ^ 2 ) || ( N ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	dvdssq 10945	Two numbers are divisible iff their squares are. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M || N <-> ( M ^ 2 ) || ( N ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutr 10946	Partial converse to bezout 10925. Existence of a linear combination does not set the GCD, but it does upper bound it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) /\ ( X e. ZZ /\ Y e. ZZ ) ) -> ( A gcd B ) || ( ( A x. X ) + ( B x. Y ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutr1 10947	Converse of bezout 10925 for when the greater common divisor is one (sufficient condition for relative primality). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) /\ ( X e. ZZ /\ Y e. ZZ ) ) -> ( ( ( A x. X ) + ( B x. Y ) ) = 1 -> ( A gcd B ) = 1 ) )
4.1.6  Algorithms
Theorem	nn0seqcvgd 10948*	A strictly-decreasing nonnegative integer sequence with initial term N reaches zero by the N th term. Deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- ( ph -> F : NN0 --> NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> N = ( F ` 0 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) =/= 0 -> ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) < ( F ` k ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F ` N ) = 0 )
Theorem	ialgrlem1st 10949	Lemma for ialgr0 10951. Expressing algrflemg 5954 in a form suitable for theorems such as iseq1 9805 or iseqfcl 9808. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x ( F o. 1st ) y ) e. S )
Theorem	ialgrlemconst 10950	Lemma for ialgr0 10951. Closure of a constant function, in a form suitable for theorems such as iseq1 9805 or iseqfcl 9808. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( ( Z X. { A } ) ` x ) e. S )
Theorem	ialgr0 10951	The value of the algorithm iterator R at 0 is the initial state A. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- R = seq M ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( Z X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( R ` M ) = A )
Theorem	ialgrf 10952	An algorithm is a step function F : S --> S on a state space S. An algorithm acts on an initial state A e. S by iteratively applying F to give A, ( F ` A ), ( F ` ( F ` A ) ) and so on. An algorithm is said to halt if a fixed point of F is reached after a finite number of iterations. The algorithm iterator R : NN0 --> S "runs" the algorithm F so that ( R ` k ) is the state after k iterations of F on the initial state A. Domain and codomain of the algorithm iterator R. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- R = seq M ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( Z X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> R : Z --> S )
Theorem	ialgrp1 10953	The value of the algorithm iterator R at ( K + 1 ). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- R = seq M ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( Z X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. V )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ K e. Z ) -> ( R ` ( K + 1 ) ) = ( F ` ( R ` K ) ) )
Theorem	ialginv 10954*	If I is an invariant of F, its value is unchanged after any number of iterations of F. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- F : S --> S   &    |- I Fn S   &    |- ( x e. S -> ( I ` ( F ` x ) ) = ( I ` x ) )   &    |- S e. V   =>    |- ( ( A e. S /\ K e. NN0 ) -> ( I ` ( R ` K ) ) = ( I ` ( R ` 0 ) ) )
Theorem	ialgcvg 10955*	One way to prove that an algorithm halts is to construct a countdown function C : S --> NN0 whose value is guaranteed to decrease for each iteration of F until it reaches 0. That is, if X e. S is not a fixed point of F, then ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) < ( C ` X ). If C is a countdown function for algorithm F, the sequence ( C ` ( R ` k ) ) reaches 0 after at most N steps, where N is the value of C for the initial state A. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- C : S --> NN0   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) < ( C ` z ) ) )   &    |- N = ( C ` A )   &    |- S e. V   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ( C ` ( R ` N ) ) = 0 )
Theorem	algcvgblem 10956	Lemma for algcvgb 10957. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- ( ( M e. NN0 /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( ( N =/= 0 -> N < M ) <-> ( ( M =/= 0 -> N < M ) /\ ( M = 0 -> N = 0 ) ) ) )
Theorem	algcvgb 10957	Two ways of expressing that C is a countdown function for algorithm F. The first is used in these theorems. The second states the condition more intuitively as a conjunction: if the countdown function's value is currently nonzero, it must decrease at the next step; if it has reached zero, it must remain zero at the next step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- C : S --> NN0   =>    |- ( X e. S -> ( ( ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) < ( C ` X ) ) <-> ( ( ( C ` X ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) < ( C ` X ) ) /\ ( ( C ` X ) = 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) = 0 ) ) ) )
Theorem	ialgcvga 10958*	The countdown function C remains 0 after N steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- C : S --> NN0   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) < ( C ` z ) ) )   &    |- N = ( C ` A )   &    |- S e. V   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ( K e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) -> ( C ` ( R ` K ) ) = 0 ) )
Theorem	ialgfx 10959*	If F reaches a fixed point when the countdown function C reaches 0, F remains fixed after N steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- C : S --> NN0   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) < ( C ` z ) ) )   &    |- N = ( C ` A )   &    |- S e. V   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` z ) = 0 -> ( F ` z ) = z ) )   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ( K e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) -> ( R ` K ) = ( R ` N ) ) )
4.1.7  Euclid's Algorithm
Theorem	eucalgval2 10960*	The value of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm on an ordered pair. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( ( M e. NN0 /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( M E N ) = if ( N = 0 , <. M , N >. , <. N , ( M mod N ) >. ) )
Theorem	eucalgval 10961*	Euclid's Algorithm eucialg 10966 computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0. The value of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( X e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( E ` X ) = if ( ( 2nd ` X ) = 0 , X , <. ( 2nd ` X ) , ( mod ` X ) >. ) )
Theorem	eucalgf 10962*	Domain and codomain of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- E : ( NN0 X. NN0 ) --> ( NN0 X. NN0 )
Theorem	eucalginv 10963*	The invariant of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm is the gcd operator applied to the state. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( X e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( gcd ` ( E ` X ) ) = ( gcd ` X ) )
Theorem	eucalglt 10964*	The second member of the state decreases with each iteration of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( X e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( ( 2nd ` ( E ` X ) ) =/= 0 -> ( 2nd ` ( E ` X ) ) < ( 2nd ` X ) ) )
Theorem	eucialgcvga 10965*	Once Euclid's Algorithm halts after N steps, the second element of the state remains 0 . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2022.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( E o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , ( NN0 X. NN0 ) )   &    |- N = ( 2nd ` A )   =>    |- ( A e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( K e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) -> ( 2nd ` ( R ` K ) ) = 0 ) )
Theorem	eucialg 10966*	Euclid's Algorithm computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0. Theorem 1.15 in [ApostolNT] p. 20. Upon halting, the 1st member of the final state ( R ` N ) is equal to the gcd of the values comprising the input state <. M , N >.. This is Metamath 100 proof #69 (greatest common divisor algorithm). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2022.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( E o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , ( NN0 X. NN0 ) )   &    |- N = ( 2nd ` A )   &    |- A = <. M , N >.   =>    |- ( ( M e. NN0 /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( 1st ` ( R ` N ) ) = ( M gcd N ) )
4.1.8  The least common multiple According to Wikipedia ("Least common multiple", 27-Aug-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_common_multiple): "In arithmetic and number theory, the least common multiple, lowest common multiple, or smallest common multiple of two integers a and b, usually denoted by lcm(a, b), is the smallest positive integer that is divisible by both a and b. Since division of integers by zero is undefined, this definition has meaning only if a and b are both different from zero. However, some authors define lcm(a,0) as 0 for all a, which is the result of taking the lcm to be the least upper bound in the lattice of divisibility." In this section, an operation calculating the least common multiple of two integers (df-lcm 10968). The definition is valid for all integers, including negative integers and 0, obeying the above mentioned convention.
Syntax	clcm 10967	Extend the definition of a class to include the least common multiple operator.
class lcm
Definition	df-lcm 10968*	Define the lcm operator. For example, ( 6 lcm 9 ) = 1 8. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- lcm = ( x e. ZZ , y e. ZZ |-> if ( ( x = 0 \/ y = 0 ) , 0 , inf ( { n e. NN | ( x || n /\ y || n ) } , RR , < ) ) )
Theorem	lcmmndc 10969	Decidablity lemma used in various proofs related to lcm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> DECID ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) )
Theorem	lcmval 10970*	Value of the lcm operator. ( M lcm N ) is the least common multiple of M and N. If either M or N is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. Contrast with df-gcd 10864 and gcdval 10876. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm N ) = if ( ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) , 0 , inf ( { n e. NN | ( M || n /\ N || n ) } , RR , < ) ) )
Theorem	lcmcom 10971	The lcm operator is commutative. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm N ) = ( N lcm M ) )
Theorem	lcm0val 10972	The value, by convention, of the lcm operator when either operand is 0. (Use lcmcom 10971 for a left-hand 0.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M lcm 0 ) = 0 )
Theorem	lcmn0val 10973*	The value of the lcm operator when both operands are nonzero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) = inf ( { n e. NN | ( M || n /\ N || n ) } , RR , < ) )
Theorem	lcmcllem 10974*	Lemma for lcmn0cl 10975 and dvdslcm 10976. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) e. { n e. NN | ( M || n /\ N || n ) } )
Theorem	lcmn0cl 10975	Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) e. NN )
Theorem	dvdslcm 10976	The lcm of two integers is divisible by each of them. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M || ( M lcm N ) /\ N || ( M lcm N ) ) )
Theorem	lcmledvds 10977	A positive integer which both operands of the lcm operator divide bounds it. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( ( K e. NN /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) -> ( M lcm N ) <_ K ) )
Theorem	lcmeq0 10978	The lcm of two integers is zero iff either is zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) = 0 <-> ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) )
Theorem	lcmcl 10979	Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm N ) e. NN0 )
Theorem	gcddvdslcm 10980	The greatest common divisor of two numbers divides their least common multiple. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M gcd N ) || ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	lcmneg 10981	Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm -u N ) = ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	neglcm 10982	Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( -u M lcm N ) = ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	lcmabs 10983	The lcm of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( abs ` M ) lcm ( abs ` N ) ) = ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	lcmgcdlem 10984	Lemma for lcmgcd 10985 and lcmdvds 10986. Prove them for positive M, N, and K. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( ( M lcm N ) x. ( M gcd N ) ) = ( abs ` ( M x. N ) ) /\ ( ( K e. NN /\ ( M || K /\ N || K ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) || K ) ) )
Theorem	lcmgcd 10985	The product of two numbers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the absolute value of the product of the two numbers. In particular, that absolute value is the least common multiple of two coprime numbers, for which ( M gcd N ) = 1. Multiple methods exist for proving this, and it is often proven either as a consequence of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic or of Bézout's identity bezout 10925; see e.g. https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_GCD_and_LCM and https://math.stackexchange.com/a/470827. This proof uses the latter to first confirm it for positive integers M and N (the "Second Proof" in the above Stack Exchange page), then shows that implies it for all nonzero integer inputs, then finally uses lcm0val 10972 to show it applies when either or both inputs are zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) x. ( M gcd N ) ) = ( abs ` ( M x. N ) ) )
Theorem	lcmdvds 10986	The lcm of two integers divides any integer the two divide. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) -> ( M lcm N ) || K ) )
Theorem	lcmid 10987	The lcm of an integer and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M lcm M ) = ( abs ` M ) )
Theorem	lcm1 10988	The lcm of an integer and 1 is the absolute value of the integer. (Contributed by AV, 23-Aug-2020.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M lcm 1 ) = ( abs ` M ) )
Theorem	lcmgcdnn 10989	The product of two positive integers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the product of the two integers. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) x. ( M gcd N ) ) = ( M x. N ) )
Theorem	lcmgcdeq 10990	Two integers' absolute values are equal iff their least common multiple and greatest common divisor are equal. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) = ( M gcd N ) <-> ( abs ` M ) = ( abs ` N ) ) )
Theorem	lcmdvdsb 10991	Biconditional form of lcmdvds 10986. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) <-> ( M lcm N ) || K ) )
Theorem	lcmass 10992	Associative law for lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( N e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ P e. ZZ ) -> ( ( N lcm M ) lcm P ) = ( N lcm ( M lcm P ) ) )
Theorem	3lcm2e6woprm 10993	The least common multiple of three and two is six. This proof does not use the property of 2 and 3 being prime. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( 3 lcm 2 ) = 6
Theorem	6lcm4e12 10994	The least common multiple of six and four is twelve. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( 6 lcm 4 ) = ; 1 2
4.1.9  Coprimality and Euclid's lemma According to Wikipedia "Coprime integers", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprime_integers (16-Aug-2020) "[...] two integers a and b are said to be relatively prime, mutually prime, or coprime [...] if the only positive integer (factor) that divides both of them is 1. Consequently, any prime number that divides one does not divide the other. This is equivalent to their greatest common divisor (gcd) being 1.". In the following, we use this equivalent characterization to say that A e. ZZ and B e. ZZ are coprime (or relatively prime) if ( A gcd B ) = 1. The equivalence of the definitions is shown by coprmgcdb 10995. The negation, i.e. two integers are not coprime, can be expressed either by ( A gcd B ) =/= 1, see ncoprmgcdne1b 10996, or equivalently by 1 < ( A gcd B ), see ncoprmgcdgt1b 10997. A proof of Euclid's lemma based on coprimality is provided in coprmdvds 10999 (as opposed to Euclid's lemma for primes).
Theorem	coprmgcdb 10995*	Two positive integers are coprime, i.e. the only positive integer that divides both of them is 1, iff their greatest common divisor is 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( A. i e. NN ( ( i || A /\ i || B ) -> i = 1 ) <-> ( A gcd B ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	ncoprmgcdne1b 10996*	Two positive integers are not coprime, i.e. there is an integer greater than 1 which divides both integers, iff their greatest common divisor is not 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( E. i e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ( i || A /\ i || B ) <-> ( A gcd B ) =/= 1 ) )
Theorem	ncoprmgcdgt1b 10997*	Two positive integers are not coprime, i.e. there is an integer greater than 1 which divides both integers, iff their greatest common divisor is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( E. i e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ( i || A /\ i || B ) <-> 1 < ( A gcd B ) ) )
Theorem	coprmdvds1 10998	If two positive integers are coprime, i.e. their greatest common divisor is 1, the only positive integer that divides both of them is 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( F e. NN /\ G e. NN /\ ( F gcd G ) = 1 ) -> ( ( I e. NN /\ I || F /\ I || G ) -> I = 1 ) )
Theorem	coprmdvds 10999	Euclid's Lemma (see ProofWiki "Euclid's Lemma", 10-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclid's_Lemma): If an integer divides the product of two integers and is coprime to one of them, then it divides the other. See also theorem 1.5 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K || ( M x. N ) /\ ( K gcd M ) = 1 ) -> K || N ) )
Theorem	coprmdvds2 11000	If an integer is divisible by two coprime integers, then it is divisible by their product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ /\ K e. ZZ ) /\ ( M gcd N ) = 1 ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) -> ( M x. N ) || K ) )