P. 81 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8001-8100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Axiom	ax-i2m1 8001	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 7959. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Axiom	ax-0lt1 8002	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0lt1 7960. Proofs should normally use 0lt1 8170 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Axiom	ax-1rid 8003	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 7961. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-0id 8004	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0id 7962. Proofs should normally use addrid 8181 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-rnegex 8005*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 7963. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Axiom	ax-precex 8006*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axprecex 7964. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Axiom	ax-cnre 8007*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 7965. For naming consistency, use cnre 8039 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltirr 8008	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax-pre-ltirr 8008. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltwlin 8009	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltwlin 7967. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 8010	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 7968. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-apti 8011	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-apti 7969. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 8012	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 7970. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 8013	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 7971. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulext 8014	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulext 7972 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Axiom	ax-arch 8015*	Archimedean axiom. Definition 3.1(2) of [Geuvers], p. 9. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axarch 7975. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use arch 9263 (which is the same, but stated in terms of NN and <). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Axiom	ax-caucvg 8016*	Completeness. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcaucvg 7984. A Cauchy sequence (as defined here, which has a rate convergence built in) of real numbers converges to a real number. Specifically on rate of convergence, all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use caucvgre 11163 (which is the same, but stated in terms of the NN and 1 / n notations). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-suploc 8017*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. Although this and ax-caucvg 8016 are both completeness properties, countable choice would probably be needed to derive this from ax-caucvg 8016. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Axiom	ax-addf 8018	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 8021 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 8018 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x + y ) ) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 7952. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Axiom	ax-mulf 8019	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This axiom tells us that x. is defined only on complex numbers which is analogous to the way that other operations are defined, for example see subf 8245 or eff 11845. However, while Metamath can handle this axiom, if we wish to work with weaker complex number axioms, we can avoid it by using the less specific mulcl 8023. Note that uses of ax-mulf 8019 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x x. y ) ) in place of x., as seen in mpomulf 8033. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 7953. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
4.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
4.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 8020	Alias for ax-cnex 7987. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	addcl 8021	Alias for ax-addcl 7992, for naming consistency with addcli 8047. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 7992 or axaddcl 7948. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	readdcl 8022	Alias for ax-addrcl 7993, for naming consistency with readdcli 8056. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	mulcl 8023	Alias for ax-mulcl 7994, for naming consistency with mulcli 8048. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	remulcl 8024	Alias for ax-mulrcl 7995, for naming consistency with remulcli 8057. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Theorem	mulcom 8025	Alias for ax-mulcom 7997, for naming consistency with mulcomi 8049. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	addass 8026	Alias for ax-addass 7998, for naming consistency with addassi 8051. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	mulass 8027	Alias for ax-mulass 7999, for naming consistency with mulassi 8052. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddi 8028	Alias for ax-distr 8000, for naming consistency with adddii 8053. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	recn 8029	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A e. CC )
Theorem	reex 8030	The real numbers form a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
|- RR e. _V
Theorem	reelprrecn 8031	Reals are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- RR e. { RR , CC }
Theorem	cnelprrecn 8032	Complex numbers are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- CC e. { RR , CC }
Theorem	mpomulf 8033*	Multiplication is an operation on complex numbers. Version of ax-mulf 8019 using maps-to notation, proved from the axioms of set theory and ax-mulcl 7994. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
|- ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x x. y ) ) : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	adddir 8034	Distributive law for complex numbers (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) + ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	0cn 8035	0 is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.)
|- 0 e. CC
Theorem	0cnd 8036	0 is a complex number, deductive form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 0 e. CC )
Theorem	c0ex 8037	0 is a set (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
|- 0 e. _V
Theorem	1ex 8038	1 is a set. Common special case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
|- 1 e. _V
Theorem	cnre 8039*	Alias for ax-cnre 8007, for naming consistency. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	mulrid 8040	1 is an identity element for multiplication. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	mullid 8041	Identity law for multiplication. Note: see mulrid 8040 for commuted version. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( 1 x. A ) = A )
Theorem	1re 8042	1 is a real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.)
|- 1 e. RR
Theorem	0re 8043	0 is a real number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- 0 e. RR
Theorem	0red 8044	0 is a real number, deductive form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 0 e. RR )
Theorem	mulridi 8045	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. 1 ) = A
Theorem	mullidi 8046	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( 1 x. A ) = A
Theorem	addcli 8047	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A + B ) e. CC
Theorem	mulcli 8048	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. B ) e. CC
Theorem	mulcomi 8049	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A )
Theorem	mulcomli 8050	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- ( A x. B ) = C   =>    |- ( B x. A ) = C
Theorem	addassi 8051	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) )
Theorem	mulassi 8052	Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) )
Theorem	adddii 8053	Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) )
Theorem	adddiri 8054	Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) + ( B x. C ) )
Theorem	recni 8055	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- A e. RR   =>    |- A e. CC
Theorem	readdcli 8056	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A + B ) e. RR
Theorem	remulcli 8057	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A x. B ) e. RR
Theorem	1red 8058	1 is an real number, deductive form (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 1 e. RR )
Theorem	1cnd 8059	1 is a complex number, deductive form (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 1 e. CC )
Theorem	mulridd 8060	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	mullidd 8061	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( 1 x. A ) = A )
Theorem	mulid2d 8062	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( 1 x. A ) = A )
Theorem	addcld 8063	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	mulcld 8064	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	mulcomd 8065	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	addassd 8066	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	mulassd 8067	Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddid 8068	Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddird 8069	Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) + ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddirp1d 8070	Distributive law, plus 1 version. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + 1 ) x. B ) = ( ( A x. B ) + B ) )
Theorem	joinlmuladdmuld 8071	Join AB+CB into (A+C) on LHS. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 26-Oct-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) + ( C x. B ) ) = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + C ) x. B ) = D )
Theorem	recnd 8072	Deduction from real number to complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. CC )
Theorem	readdcld 8073	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	remulcld 8074	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
4.2.2  Infinity and the extended real number system
Syntax	cpnf 8075	Plus infinity.
class +oo
Syntax	cmnf 8076	Minus infinity.
class -oo
Syntax	cxr 8077	The set of extended reals (includes plus and minus infinity).
class RR*
Syntax	clt 8078	'Less than' predicate (extended to include the extended reals).
class <
Syntax	cle 8079	Extend wff notation to include the 'less than or equal to' relation.
class <_
Definition	df-pnf 8080	Define plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that +oo be a set not in RR and different from -oo (df-mnf 8081). We use ~P U. CC to make it independent of the construction of CC, and Cantor's Theorem will show that it is different from any member of CC and therefore RR. See pnfnre 8085 and mnfnre 8086, and we'll also be able to prove +oo =/= -oo. A simpler possibility is to define +oo as CC and -oo as { CC }, but that approach requires the Axiom of Regularity to show that +oo and -oo are different from each other and from all members of RR. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- +oo = ~P U. CC
Definition	df-mnf 8081	Define minus infinity as the power set of plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that -oo be a set not in RR and different from +oo (see mnfnre 8086). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- -oo = ~P +oo
Definition	df-xr 8082	Define the set of extended reals that includes plus and minus infinity. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- RR* = ( RR u. { +oo , -oo } )
Definition	df-ltxr 8083*	Define 'less than' on the set of extended reals. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. Note that in our postulates for complex numbers, <RR is primitive and not necessarily a relation on RR. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- < = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. RR /\ y e. RR /\ x <RR y ) } u. ( ( ( RR u. { -oo } ) X. { +oo } ) u. ( { -oo } X. RR ) ) )
Definition	df-le 8084	Define 'less than or equal to' on the extended real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- <_ = ( ( RR* X. RR* ) \ `' < )
Theorem	pnfnre 8085	Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- +oo e/ RR
Theorem	mnfnre 8086	Minus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- -oo e/ RR
Theorem	ressxr 8087	The standard reals are a subset of the extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- RR C_ RR*
Theorem	rexpssxrxp 8088	The Cartesian product of standard reals are a subset of the Cartesian product of extended reals (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- ( RR X. RR ) C_ ( RR* X. RR* )
Theorem	rexr 8089	A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A e. RR* )
Theorem	0xr 8090	Zero is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.)
|- 0 e. RR*
Theorem	renepnf 8091	No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A =/= +oo )
Theorem	renemnf 8092	No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A =/= -oo )
Theorem	rexrd 8093	A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. RR* )
Theorem	renepnfd 8094	No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> A =/= +oo )
Theorem	renemnfd 8095	No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> A =/= -oo )
Theorem	pnfxr 8096	Plus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.)
|- +oo e. RR*
Theorem	pnfex 8097	Plus infinity exists (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- +oo e. _V
Theorem	pnfnemnf 8098	Plus and minus infinity are different elements of RR*. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- +oo =/= -oo
Theorem	mnfnepnf 8099	Minus and plus infinity are different (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- -oo =/= +oo
Theorem	mnfxr 8100	Minus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- -oo e. RR*