P. 81 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8001-8100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	axaddf 8001	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 7997. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 8067. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axmulf 8002	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This is the construction-dependent version of ax-mulf 8068 and it should not be referenced outside the construction. We generally prefer to develop our theory using the less specific mulcl 8072. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axaddcom 8003	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcom 8045 be used later. Instead, use addcom 8229. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on real number trichotomy and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	axmulcom 8004	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 8046 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 8074. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	axaddass 8005	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 8047 be used later. Instead, use addass 8075. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	axmulass 8006	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 8048. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axdistr 8007	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 8049 be used later. Instead, use adddi 8077. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axi2m1 8008	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 8050. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Theorem	ax0lt1 8009	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0lt1 8051. The version of this axiom in the Metamath Proof Explorer reads 1 =/= 0; here we change it to 0 <RR 1. The proof of 0 <RR 1 from 1 =/= 0 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (accessed 12-Jan-2020) relies on real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Theorem	ax1rid 8010	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 8052. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	ax0id 8011	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0id 8053. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on excluded middle and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	axrnegex 8012*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 8054. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Theorem	axprecex 8013*	Existence of positive reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-precex 8055. In treatments which assume excluded middle, the 0 <RR A condition is generally replaced by A =/= 0, and it may not be necessary to state that the reciproacal is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	axcnre 8014*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 8056. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 8015	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 8057. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 8016	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 8058. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 8017	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 8059. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Theorem	axpre-apti 8018	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 8060. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 8019	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 8061. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 8020	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 8062. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulext 8021	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulext 8063. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Theorem	rereceu 8022*	The reciprocal from axprecex 8013 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E! x e. RR ( A x. x ) = 1 )
Theorem	recriota 8023*	Two ways to express the reciprocal of a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( iota_ r e. RR ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. r ) = 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	axarch 8024*	Archimedean axiom. The Archimedean property is more naturally stated once we have defined NN. Unless we find another way to state it, we'll just use the right hand side of dfnn2 9058 in stating what we mean by "natural number" in the context of this axiom. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-arch 8064. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Theorem	peano5nnnn 8025*	Peano's inductive postulate. This is a counterpart to peano5nni 9059 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8033). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( ( 1 e. A /\ A. z e. A ( z + 1 ) e. A ) -> N C_ A )
Theorem	nnindnn 8026*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). This is a counterpart to nnind 9072 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8033). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( z = 1 -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( z = k -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( k + 1 ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( k e. N -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ta )
Theorem	nntopi 8027*	Mapping from NN to N.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> E. z e. N. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcl 8028*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8033. Mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) e. R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemf 8029*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8033. Mapping to N. and R. yields a sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G : N. --> R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemval 8030*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8033. Value of sequence when mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. ( G ` J ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcau 8031*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8033. The result of mapping to N. and R. satisfies the Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( G ` n ) <R ( ( G ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( G ` k ) <R ( ( G ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvglemres 8032*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8033. Mapping the limit from N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvg 8033*	Real number completeness axiom. A Cauchy sequence with a modulus of convergence converges. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). Because we are stating this axiom before we have introduced notations for NN or division, we use N for the natural numbers and express a reciprocal in terms of iota_. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-caucvg 8065. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploclemres 8034*	Lemma for axpre-suploc 8035. The result. The proof just needs to define B as basically the same set as A (but expressed as a subset of R. rather than a subset of RR), and apply suplocsr 7942. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) )   &    |- B = { w e. R. | <. w , 0R >. e. A }   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploc 8035*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-suploc 8066. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
4.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 8036	The complex numbers form a set. Proofs should normally use cnex 8069 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- CC e. _V
Axiom	ax-resscn 8037	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 7993. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- RR C_ CC
Axiom	ax-1cn 8038	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 7994. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- 1 e. CC
Axiom	ax-1re 8039	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1re 7995. Proofs should use 1re 8091 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Axiom	ax-icn 8040	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 7996. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- _i e. CC
Axiom	ax-addcl 8041	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 7997. Proofs should normally use addcl 8070 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-addrcl 8042	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 7998. Proofs should normally use readdcl 8071 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-mulcl 8043	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 7999. Proofs should normally use mulcl 8072 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 8044	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 8000. Proofs should normally use remulcl 8073 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-addcom 8045	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcom 8003. Proofs should normally use addcom 8229 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Axiom	ax-mulcom 8046	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 8004. Proofs should normally use mulcom 8074 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Axiom	ax-addass 8047	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 8005. Proofs should normally use addass 8075 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-mulass 8048	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 8006. Proofs should normally use mulass 8076 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-distr 8049	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 8007. Proofs should normally use adddi 8077 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-i2m1 8050	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 8008. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Axiom	ax-0lt1 8051	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0lt1 8009. Proofs should normally use 0lt1 8219 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Axiom	ax-1rid 8052	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 8010. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-0id 8053	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0id 8011. Proofs should normally use addrid 8230 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-rnegex 8054*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 8012. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Axiom	ax-precex 8055*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axprecex 8013. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Axiom	ax-cnre 8056*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 8014. For naming consistency, use cnre 8088 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltirr 8057	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax-pre-ltirr 8057. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltwlin 8058	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltwlin 8016. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 8059	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 8017. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-apti 8060	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-apti 8018. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 8061	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 8019. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 8062	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 8020. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulext 8063	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulext 8021 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Axiom	ax-arch 8064*	Archimedean axiom. Definition 3.1(2) of [Geuvers], p. 9. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axarch 8024. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use arch 9312 (which is the same, but stated in terms of NN and <). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Axiom	ax-caucvg 8065*	Completeness. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcaucvg 8033. A Cauchy sequence (as defined here, which has a rate convergence built in) of real numbers converges to a real number. Specifically on rate of convergence, all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use caucvgre 11367 (which is the same, but stated in terms of the NN and 1 / n notations). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-suploc 8066*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. Although this and ax-caucvg 8065 are both completeness properties, countable choice would probably be needed to derive this from ax-caucvg 8065. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Axiom	ax-addf 8067	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 8070 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 8067 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x + y ) ) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 8001. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Axiom	ax-mulf 8068	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This axiom tells us that x. is defined only on complex numbers which is analogous to the way that other operations are defined, for example see subf 8294 or eff 12049. However, while Metamath can handle this axiom, if we wish to work with weaker complex number axioms, we can avoid it by using the less specific mulcl 8072. Note that uses of ax-mulf 8068 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x x. y ) ) in place of x., as seen in mpomulf 8082. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 8002. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
4.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
4.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 8069	Alias for ax-cnex 8036. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	addcl 8070	Alias for ax-addcl 8041, for naming consistency with addcli 8096. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 8041 or axaddcl 7997. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	readdcl 8071	Alias for ax-addrcl 8042, for naming consistency with readdcli 8105. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	mulcl 8072	Alias for ax-mulcl 8043, for naming consistency with mulcli 8097. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	remulcl 8073	Alias for ax-mulrcl 8044, for naming consistency with remulcli 8106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Theorem	mulcom 8074	Alias for ax-mulcom 8046, for naming consistency with mulcomi 8098. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	addass 8075	Alias for ax-addass 8047, for naming consistency with addassi 8100. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	mulass 8076	Alias for ax-mulass 8048, for naming consistency with mulassi 8101. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddi 8077	Alias for ax-distr 8049, for naming consistency with adddii 8102. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	recn 8078	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A e. CC )
Theorem	reex 8079	The real numbers form a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
|- RR e. _V
Theorem	reelprrecn 8080	Reals are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- RR e. { RR , CC }
Theorem	cnelprrecn 8081	Complex numbers are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- CC e. { RR , CC }
Theorem	mpomulf 8082*	Multiplication is an operation on complex numbers. Version of ax-mulf 8068 using maps-to notation, proved from the axioms of set theory and ax-mulcl 8043. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
|- ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x x. y ) ) : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	adddir 8083	Distributive law for complex numbers (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) + ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	0cn 8084	0 is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.)
|- 0 e. CC
Theorem	0cnd 8085	0 is a complex number, deductive form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 0 e. CC )
Theorem	c0ex 8086	0 is a set (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
|- 0 e. _V
Theorem	1ex 8087	1 is a set. Common special case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
|- 1 e. _V
Theorem	cnre 8088*	Alias for ax-cnre 8056, for naming consistency. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	mulrid 8089	1 is an identity element for multiplication. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	mullid 8090	Identity law for multiplication. Note: see mulrid 8089 for commuted version. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( 1 x. A ) = A )
Theorem	1re 8091	1 is a real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.)
|- 1 e. RR
Theorem	0re 8092	0 is a real number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- 0 e. RR
Theorem	0red 8093	0 is a real number, deductive form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 0 e. RR )
Theorem	mulridi 8094	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. 1 ) = A
Theorem	mullidi 8095	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( 1 x. A ) = A
Theorem	addcli 8096	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A + B ) e. CC
Theorem	mulcli 8097	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. B ) e. CC
Theorem	mulcomi 8098	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A )
Theorem	mulcomli 8099	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- ( A x. B ) = C   =>    |- ( B x. A ) = C
Theorem	addassi 8100	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) )