P. 74 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7301-7400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	exmidonfin 7301	If a finite ordinal is a natural number, excluded middle follows. That excluded middle implies that a finite ordinal is a natural number is proved in the Metamath Proof Explorer. That a natural number is a finite ordinal is shown at nnfi 6968 and nnon 4657. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
|- ( om = ( On i^i Fin ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	en2eleq 7302	Express a set of pair cardinality as the unordered pair of a given element and the other element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. P /\ P ~~ 2o ) -> P = { X , U. ( P \ { X } ) } )
Theorem	en2other2 7303	Taking the other element twice in a pair gets back to the original element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. P /\ P ~~ 2o ) -> U. ( P \ { U. ( P \ { X } ) } ) = X )
Theorem	dju1p1e2 7304	Disjoint union version of one plus one equals two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- ( 1o ⊔ 1o ) ~~ 2o
Theorem	infpwfidom 7305	The collection of finite subsets of a set dominates the set. (We use the weaker sethood assumption ( ~P A i^i Fin ) e. _V because this theorem also implies that A is a set if ~P A i^i Fin is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
|- ( ( ~P A i^i Fin ) e. _V -> A ~<_ ( ~P A i^i Fin ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemeldju 7306	Lemma for exmidfodomr 7311. A variant of djur 7170. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ( A ⊔ 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B = (inl ` (/) ) \/ B = (inr ` (/) ) ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemreseldju 7307	Lemma for exmidfodomrlemrALT 7310. A variant of eldju 7169. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ( A ⊔ 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( (/) e. A /\ B = ( (inl |` A ) ` (/) ) ) \/ B = ( (inr |` 1o ) ` (/) ) ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemim 7308*	Excluded middle implies the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. Proposition 1.1 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemr 7309*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemrALT 7310*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. An alternative proof of exmidfodomrlemr 7309. In particular, this proof uses eldju 7169 instead of djur 7170 and avoids djulclb 7156. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidfodomr 7311*	Excluded middle is equivalent to the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) )
Theorem	acnrcl 7312	Reverse closure for the choice set predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( X e. AC A -> A e. _V )
Theorem	acneq 7313	Equality theorem for the choice set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = C -> AC A = AC C )
Theorem	isacnm 7314*	The property of being a choice set of length A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. V /\ A e. W ) -> ( X e. AC A <-> A. f e. ( { z e. ~P X | E. j j e. z } ^m A ) E. g A. x e. A ( g ` x ) e. ( f ` x ) ) )
Theorem	finacn 7315	Every set has finite choice sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> AC A = _V )
2.6.42  Axiom of Choice equivalents
Syntax	wac 7316	Formula for an abbreviation of the axiom of choice.
wff CHOICE
Definition	df-ac 7317*	The expression CHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of the axiom of choice; all concrete forms are long, cryptic, have dummy variables, or all three, making it useful to have a short name. Similar to the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49. There are some decisions about how to write this definition especially around whether ax-setind 4584 is needed to show equivalence to other ways of stating choice, and about whether choice functions are available for nonempty sets or inhabited sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2015.)
|- (CHOICE <-> A. x E. f ( f C_ x /\ f Fn dom x ) )
Theorem	acfun 7318*	A convenient form of choice. The goal here is to state choice as the existence of a choice function on a set of inhabited sets, while making full use of our notation around functions and function values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ph -> CHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A E. w w e. x )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidaclem 7319*	Lemma for exmidac 7320. The result, with a few hypotheses to break out commonly used expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
|- A = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = (/) \/ y = { (/) } ) }   &    |- B = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = { (/) } \/ y = { (/) } ) }   &    |- C = { A , B }   =>    |- (CHOICE -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidac 7320	The axiom of choice implies excluded middle. See acexmid 5942 for more discussion of this theorem and a way of stating it without using CHOICE or EXMID. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
|- (CHOICE -> EXMID )
2.6.43  Cardinal number arithmetic
Theorem	endjudisj 7321	Equinumerosity of a disjoint union and a union of two disjoint sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ ( A i^i B ) = (/) ) -> ( A ⊔ B ) ~~ ( A u. B ) )
Theorem	djuen 7322	Disjoint unions of equinumerous sets are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D ) -> ( A ⊔ C ) ~~ ( B ⊔ D ) )
Theorem	djuenun 7323	Disjoint union is equinumerous to union for disjoint sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D /\ ( B i^i D ) = (/) ) -> ( A ⊔ C ) ~~ ( B u. D ) )
Theorem	dju1en 7324	Cardinal addition with cardinal one (which is the same as ordinal one). Used in proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ -. A e. A ) -> ( A ⊔ 1o ) ~~ suc A )
Theorem	dju0en 7325	Cardinal addition with cardinal zero (the empty set). Part (a1) of proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A ⊔ (/) ) ~~ A )
Theorem	xp2dju 7326	Two times a cardinal number. Exercise 4.56(g) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( 2o X. A ) = ( A ⊔ A )
Theorem	djucomen 7327	Commutative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A ⊔ B ) ~~ ( B ⊔ A ) )
Theorem	djuassen 7328	Associative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( ( A ⊔ B ) ⊔ C ) ~~ ( A ⊔ ( B ⊔ C ) ) )
Theorem	xpdjuen 7329	Cardinal multiplication distributes over cardinal addition. Theorem 6I(3) of [Enderton] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A X. ( B ⊔ C ) ) ~~ ( ( A X. B ) ⊔ ( A X. C ) ) )
Theorem	djudoml 7330	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> A ~<_ ( A ⊔ B ) )
Theorem	djudomr 7331	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> B ~<_ ( A ⊔ B ) )
2.6.44  Ordinal trichotomy
Theorem	exmidontriimlem1 7332	Lemma for exmidontriim 7336. A variation of r19.30dc 2652. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps \/ ch ) /\ EXMID ) -> ( E. x e. A ph \/ E. x e. A ps \/ A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem2 7333*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7336. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. B ( A e. y \/ A = y \/ y e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A. y e. B y e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem3 7334*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7336. What we get to do based on induction on both A and B. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. B ( A e. y \/ A = y \/ y e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem4 7335*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7336. The induction step for the induction on A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriim 7336*	Excluded middle implies ordinal trichotomy. Lemma 10.4.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The proof follows the proof from the HoTT book fairly closely. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
2.6.45  Excluded middle and the power set of a singleton
Theorem	pw1on 7337	The power set of 1o is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o e. On
Theorem	pw1dom2 7338	The power set of 1o dominates 2o. Also see pwpw0ss 3844 which is similar. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2022.)
|- 2o ~<_ ~P 1o
Theorem	pw1ne0 7339	The power set of 1o is not zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= (/)
Theorem	pw1ne1 7340	The power set of 1o is not one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 1o
Theorem	pw1ne3 7341	The power set of 1o is not three. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 3o
Theorem	pw1nel3 7342	Negated excluded middle implies that the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. ~P 1o e. 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1ne3 7343	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not three . (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> suc ~P 1o =/= 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1nel3 7344	The successor of the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- -. suc ~P 1o e. 3o
Theorem	3nelsucpw1 7345	Three is not an element of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- -. 3o e. suc ~P 1o
Theorem	sucpw1nss3 7346	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not a subset of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. suc ~P 1o C_ 3o )
Theorem	3nsssucpw1 7347	Negated excluded middle implies that 3o is not a subset of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. 3o C_ suc ~P 1o )
Theorem	onntri35 7348*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. There are five equivalent statements: (1) -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ), (2) -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ), (3) A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ), (4) A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ), and (5) -. -. EXMID. That these are all equivalent is expressed by (1) implies (3) (onntri13 7349), (3) implies (5) (onntri35 7348), (5) implies (1) (onntri51 7351), (2) implies (4) (onntri24 7353), (4) implies (5) (onntri45 7352), and (5) implies (2) (onntri52 7355). Another way of stating this is that EXMID is equivalent to trichotomy, either the x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x or the x C_ y \/ y C_ x form, as shown in exmidontri 7350 and exmidontri2or 7354, respectively. Thus -. -. EXMID is equivalent to (1) or (2). In addition, -. -. EXMID is equivalent to (3) by onntri3or 7356 and (4) by onntri2or 7357. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) -> -. -. EXMID )
Theorem	onntri13 7349	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) -> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidontri 7350*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri51 7351*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID -> -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri45 7352*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) -> -. -. EXMID )
Theorem	onntri24 7353	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) -> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	exmidontri2or 7354*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	onntri52 7355*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID -> -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	onntri3or 7356*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri2or 7357*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
2.6.46  Apartness relations
Syntax	wap 7358	Apartness predicate symbol.
wff R Ap A
Definition	df-pap 7359*	Apartness predicate. A relation R is an apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, and cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
|- ( R Ap A <-> ( ( R C_ ( A X. A ) /\ A. x e. A -. x R x ) /\ ( A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y -> y R x ) /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A A. z e. A ( x R y -> ( x R z \/ y R z ) ) ) ) )
Syntax	wtap 7360	Tight apartness predicate symbol.
wff R TAp A
Definition	df-tap 7361*	Tight apartness predicate. A relation R is a tight apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, cotransitive, and tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
|- ( R TAp A <-> ( R Ap A /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( -. x R y -> x = y ) ) )
Theorem	dftap2 7362*	Tight apartness with the apartness properties from df-pap 7359 expanded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2025.)
|- ( R TAp A <-> ( R C_ ( A X. A ) /\ ( A. x e. A -. x R x /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y -> y R x ) ) /\ ( A. x e. A A. y e. A A. z e. A ( x R y -> ( x R z \/ y R z ) ) /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( -. x R y -> x = y ) ) ) )
Theorem	tapeq1 7363	Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R TAp A <-> S TAp A ) )
Theorem	tapeq2 7364	Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2025.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R TAp A <-> R TAp B ) )
Theorem	netap 7365*	Negated equality on a set with decidable equality is a tight apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y -> { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) /\ u =/= v ) } TAp A )
Theorem	2onetap 7366*	Negated equality is a tight apartness on 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
|- { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. 2o /\ v e. 2o ) /\ u =/= v ) } TAp 2o
Theorem	2oneel 7367*	(/) and 1o are two unequal elements of 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
|- <. (/) , 1o >. e. { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. 2o /\ v e. 2o ) /\ u =/= v ) }
Theorem	2omotaplemap 7368*	Lemma for 2omotap 7370. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
|- ( -. -. ph -> { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. 2o /\ v e. 2o ) /\ ( ph /\ u =/= v ) ) } TAp 2o )
Theorem	2omotaplemst 7369*	Lemma for 2omotap 7370. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
|- ( ( E* r r TAp 2o /\ -. -. ph ) -> ph )
Theorem	2omotap 7370	If there is at most one tight apartness on 2o, excluded middle follows. Based on online discussions by Tom de Jong, Andrew W Swan, and Martin Escardo. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
|- ( E* r r TAp 2o -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidapne 7371*	Excluded middle implies there is only one tight apartness on any class, namely negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
|- (EXMID -> ( R TAp A <-> R = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
Theorem	exmidmotap 7372*	The proposition that every class has at most one tight apartness is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x E* r r TAp x )
PART 3  CHOICE PRINCIPLES We have already introduced the full Axiom of Choice df-ac 7317 but since it implies excluded middle as shown at exmidac 7320, it is not especially relevant to us. In this section we define countable choice and dependent choice, which are not as strong as thus often considered in mathematics which seeks to avoid full excluded middle.
3.1  Countable Choice and Dependent Choice
3.1.1  Introduce Countable Choice
Syntax	wacc 7373	Formula for an abbreviation of countable choice.
wff CCHOICE
Definition	df-cc 7374*	The expression CCHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of countable choice, analogous to df-ac 7317 for full choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Nov-2023.)
|- (CCHOICE <-> A. x ( dom x ~~ om -> E. f ( f C_ x /\ f Fn dom x ) ) )
Theorem	ccfunen 7375*	Existence of a choice function for a countably infinite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A ~~ om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A E. w w e. x )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. x ) )
Theorem	cc1 7376*	Countable choice in terms of a choice function on a countably infinite set of inhabited sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
|- (CCHOICE -> A. x ( ( x ~~ om /\ A. z e. x E. w w e. z ) -> E. f A. z e. x ( f ` z ) e. z ) )
Theorem	cc2lem 7377*	Lemma for cc2 7378. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. om E. w w e. ( F ` x ) )   &    |- A = ( n e. om |-> ( { n } X. ( F ` n ) ) )   &    |- G = ( n e. om |-> ( 2nd ` ( f ` ( A ` n ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. g ( g Fn om /\ A. n e. om ( g ` n ) e. ( F ` n ) ) )
Theorem	cc2 7378*	Countable choice using sequences instead of countable sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. om E. w w e. ( F ` x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. g ( g Fn om /\ A. n e. om ( g ` n ) e. ( F ` n ) ) )
Theorem	cc3 7379*	Countable choice using a sequence F(n) . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N F e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. w w e. F )   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn N /\ A. n e. N ( f ` n ) e. F ) )
Theorem	cc4f 7380*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function f which can choose a value at each index n such that ch holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- F/_ n A   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   &    |- ( x = ( f ` n ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f : N --> A /\ A. n e. N ch ) )
Theorem	cc4 7381*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function f which can choose a value at each index n such that ch holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 1-May-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   &    |- ( x = ( f ` n ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f : N --> A /\ A. n e. N ch ) )
Theorem	cc4n 7382*	Countable choice with a simpler restriction on how every set in the countable collection needs to be inhabited. That is, compared with cc4 7381, the hypotheses only require an A(n) for each value of n, not a single set A which suffices for every n e. om. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N { x e. A | ps } e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   &    |- ( x = ( f ` n ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn N /\ A. n e. N ch ) )
Theorem	acnccim 7383	Given countable choice, every set has choice sets of length om. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- (CCHOICE -> AC om = _V )
PART 4  REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBERS This section derives the basics of real and complex numbers. To construct the real numbers constructively, we follow two main sources. The first is Metamath Proof Explorer, which has the advantage of being already formalized in metamath. Its disadvantage, for our purposes, is that it assumes the law of the excluded middle throughout. Since we have already developed natural numbers ( for example, nna0 6559 and similar theorems ), going from there to positive integers (df-ni 7416) and then positive rational numbers (df-nqqs 7460) does not involve a major change in approach compared with the Metamath Proof Explorer. It is when we proceed to Dedekind cuts that we bring in more material from Section 11.2 of [HoTT], which focuses on the aspects of Dedekind cuts which are different without excluded middle or choice principles. With excluded middle, it is natural to define a cut as the lower set only (as Metamath Proof Explorer does), but here we define the cut as a pair of both the lower and upper sets, as [HoTT] does. There are also differences in how we handle order and replacing "not equal to zero" with "apart from zero". When working constructively, there are several possible definitions of real numbers. Here we adopt the most common definition, as two-sided Dedekind cuts with the properties described at df-inp 7578. The Cauchy reals (without countable choice) fail to satisfy ax-caucvg 8044 and the MacNeille reals fail to satisfy axltwlin 8139, and we do not develop them here. For more on differing definitions of the reals, see the introduction to Chapter 11 in [HoTT] or Section 1.2 of [BauerHanson].
4.1  Construction and axiomatization of real and complex numbers
4.1.1  Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers
Syntax	cnpi 7384	The set of positive integers, which is the set of natural numbers om with 0 removed. Note: This is the start of the Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers.
class N.
Syntax	cpli 7385	Positive integer addition.
class +N
Syntax	cmi 7386	Positive integer multiplication.
class .N
Syntax	clti 7387	Positive integer ordering relation.
class <N
Syntax	cplpq 7388	Positive pre-fraction addition.
class +pQ
Syntax	cmpq 7389	Positive pre-fraction multiplication.
class .pQ
Syntax	cltpq 7390	Positive pre-fraction ordering relation.
class <pQ
Syntax	ceq 7391	Equivalence class used to construct positive fractions.
class ~Q
Syntax	cnq 7392	Set of positive fractions.
class Q.
Syntax	c1q 7393	The positive fraction constant 1.
class 1Q
Syntax	cplq 7394	Positive fraction addition.
class +Q
Syntax	cmq 7395	Positive fraction multiplication.
class .Q
Syntax	crq 7396	Positive fraction reciprocal operation.
class *Q
Syntax	cltq 7397	Positive fraction ordering relation.
class <Q
Syntax	ceq0 7398	Equivalence class used to construct nonnegative fractions.
class ~Q0
Syntax	cnq0 7399	Set of nonnegative fractions.
class Q0
Syntax	c0q0 7400	The nonnegative fraction constant 0.
class 0Q0