P. 114 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 11301-11400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
4.1.6  Algorithms
Theorem	nn0seqcvgd 11301*	A strictly-decreasing nonnegative integer sequence with initial term N reaches zero by the N th term. Deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- ( ph -> F : NN0 --> NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> N = ( F ` 0 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) =/= 0 -> ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) < ( F ` k ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F ` N ) = 0 )
Theorem	ialgrlem1st 11302	Lemma for ialgr0 11304. Expressing algrflemg 5995 in a form suitable for theorems such as iseq1 9875 or iseqfcl 9878. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x ( F o. 1st ) y ) e. S )
Theorem	ialgrlemconst 11303	Lemma for ialgr0 11304. Closure of a constant function, in a form suitable for theorems such as iseq1 9875 or iseqfcl 9878. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( ( Z X. { A } ) ` x ) e. S )
Theorem	ialgr0 11304	The value of the algorithm iterator R at 0 is the initial state A. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- R = seq M ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( Z X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( R ` M ) = A )
Theorem	ialgrf 11305	An algorithm is a step function F : S --> S on a state space S. An algorithm acts on an initial state A e. S by iteratively applying F to give A, ( F ` A ), ( F ` ( F ` A ) ) and so on. An algorithm is said to halt if a fixed point of F is reached after a finite number of iterations. The algorithm iterator R : NN0 --> S "runs" the algorithm F so that ( R ` k ) is the state after k iterations of F on the initial state A. Domain and codomain of the algorithm iterator R. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- R = seq M ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( Z X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> R : Z --> S )
Theorem	ialgrp1 11306	The value of the algorithm iterator R at ( K + 1 ). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- R = seq M ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( Z X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. V )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ K e. Z ) -> ( R ` ( K + 1 ) ) = ( F ` ( R ` K ) ) )
Theorem	ialginv 11307*	If I is an invariant of F, its value is unchanged after any number of iterations of F. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- F : S --> S   &    |- I Fn S   &    |- ( x e. S -> ( I ` ( F ` x ) ) = ( I ` x ) )   &    |- S e. V   =>    |- ( ( A e. S /\ K e. NN0 ) -> ( I ` ( R ` K ) ) = ( I ` ( R ` 0 ) ) )
Theorem	ialgcvg 11308*	One way to prove that an algorithm halts is to construct a countdown function C : S --> NN0 whose value is guaranteed to decrease for each iteration of F until it reaches 0. That is, if X e. S is not a fixed point of F, then ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) < ( C ` X ). If C is a countdown function for algorithm F, the sequence ( C ` ( R ` k ) ) reaches 0 after at most N steps, where N is the value of C for the initial state A. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- C : S --> NN0   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) < ( C ` z ) ) )   &    |- N = ( C ` A )   &    |- S e. V   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ( C ` ( R ` N ) ) = 0 )
Theorem	algcvgblem 11309	Lemma for algcvgb 11310. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- ( ( M e. NN0 /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( ( N =/= 0 -> N < M ) <-> ( ( M =/= 0 -> N < M ) /\ ( M = 0 -> N = 0 ) ) ) )
Theorem	algcvgb 11310	Two ways of expressing that C is a countdown function for algorithm F. The first is used in these theorems. The second states the condition more intuitively as a conjunction: if the countdown function's value is currently nonzero, it must decrease at the next step; if it has reached zero, it must remain zero at the next step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- C : S --> NN0   =>    |- ( X e. S -> ( ( ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) < ( C ` X ) ) <-> ( ( ( C ` X ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) < ( C ` X ) ) /\ ( ( C ` X ) = 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) = 0 ) ) ) )
Theorem	ialgcvga 11311*	The countdown function C remains 0 after N steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- C : S --> NN0   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) < ( C ` z ) ) )   &    |- N = ( C ` A )   &    |- S e. V   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ( K e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) -> ( C ` ( R ` K ) ) = 0 ) )
Theorem	ialgfx 11312*	If F reaches a fixed point when the countdown function C reaches 0, F remains fixed after N steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , S )   &    |- C : S --> NN0   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) < ( C ` z ) ) )   &    |- N = ( C ` A )   &    |- S e. V   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` z ) = 0 -> ( F ` z ) = z ) )   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ( K e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) -> ( R ` K ) = ( R ` N ) ) )
4.1.7  Euclid's Algorithm
Theorem	eucalgval2 11313*	The value of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm on an ordered pair. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( ( M e. NN0 /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( M E N ) = if ( N = 0 , <. M , N >. , <. N , ( M mod N ) >. ) )
Theorem	eucalgval 11314*	Euclid's Algorithm eucialg 11319 computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0. The value of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( X e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( E ` X ) = if ( ( 2nd ` X ) = 0 , X , <. ( 2nd ` X ) , ( mod ` X ) >. ) )
Theorem	eucalgf 11315*	Domain and codomain of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- E : ( NN0 X. NN0 ) --> ( NN0 X. NN0 )
Theorem	eucalginv 11316*	The invariant of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm is the gcd operator applied to the state. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( X e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( gcd ` ( E ` X ) ) = ( gcd ` X ) )
Theorem	eucalglt 11317*	The second member of the state decreases with each iteration of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( X e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( ( 2nd ` ( E ` X ) ) =/= 0 -> ( 2nd ` ( E ` X ) ) < ( 2nd ` X ) ) )
Theorem	eucialgcvga 11318*	Once Euclid's Algorithm halts after N steps, the second element of the state remains 0 . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2022.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( E o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , ( NN0 X. NN0 ) )   &    |- N = ( 2nd ` A )   =>    |- ( A e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( K e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) -> ( 2nd ` ( R ` K ) ) = 0 ) )
Theorem	eucialg 11319*	Euclid's Algorithm computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0. Theorem 1.15 in [ApostolNT] p. 20. Upon halting, the 1st member of the final state ( R ` N ) is equal to the gcd of the values comprising the input state <. M , N >.. This is Metamath 100 proof #69 (greatest common divisor algorithm). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2022.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( E o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) , ( NN0 X. NN0 ) )   &    |- N = ( 2nd ` A )   &    |- A = <. M , N >.   =>    |- ( ( M e. NN0 /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( 1st ` ( R ` N ) ) = ( M gcd N ) )
4.1.8  The least common multiple According to Wikipedia ("Least common multiple", 27-Aug-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_common_multiple): "In arithmetic and number theory, the least common multiple, lowest common multiple, or smallest common multiple of two integers a and b, usually denoted by lcm(a, b), is the smallest positive integer that is divisible by both a and b. Since division of integers by zero is undefined, this definition has meaning only if a and b are both different from zero. However, some authors define lcm(a,0) as 0 for all a, which is the result of taking the lcm to be the least upper bound in the lattice of divisibility." In this section, an operation calculating the least common multiple of two integers (df-lcm 11321). The definition is valid for all integers, including negative integers and 0, obeying the above mentioned convention.
Syntax	clcm 11320	Extend the definition of a class to include the least common multiple operator.
class lcm
Definition	df-lcm 11321*	Define the lcm operator. For example, ( 6 lcm 9 ) = 1 8. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- lcm = ( x e. ZZ , y e. ZZ |-> if ( ( x = 0 \/ y = 0 ) , 0 , inf ( { n e. NN | ( x || n /\ y || n ) } , RR , < ) ) )
Theorem	lcmmndc 11322	Decidablity lemma used in various proofs related to lcm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> DECID ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) )
Theorem	lcmval 11323*	Value of the lcm operator. ( M lcm N ) is the least common multiple of M and N. If either M or N is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. Contrast with df-gcd 11217 and gcdval 11229. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm N ) = if ( ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) , 0 , inf ( { n e. NN | ( M || n /\ N || n ) } , RR , < ) ) )
Theorem	lcmcom 11324	The lcm operator is commutative. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm N ) = ( N lcm M ) )
Theorem	lcm0val 11325	The value, by convention, of the lcm operator when either operand is 0. (Use lcmcom 11324 for a left-hand 0.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M lcm 0 ) = 0 )
Theorem	lcmn0val 11326*	The value of the lcm operator when both operands are nonzero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) = inf ( { n e. NN | ( M || n /\ N || n ) } , RR , < ) )
Theorem	lcmcllem 11327*	Lemma for lcmn0cl 11328 and dvdslcm 11329. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) e. { n e. NN | ( M || n /\ N || n ) } )
Theorem	lcmn0cl 11328	Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) e. NN )
Theorem	dvdslcm 11329	The lcm of two integers is divisible by each of them. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M || ( M lcm N ) /\ N || ( M lcm N ) ) )
Theorem	lcmledvds 11330	A positive integer which both operands of the lcm operator divide bounds it. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( ( K e. NN /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) -> ( M lcm N ) <_ K ) )
Theorem	lcmeq0 11331	The lcm of two integers is zero iff either is zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) = 0 <-> ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) )
Theorem	lcmcl 11332	Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm N ) e. NN0 )
Theorem	gcddvdslcm 11333	The greatest common divisor of two numbers divides their least common multiple. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M gcd N ) || ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	lcmneg 11334	Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm -u N ) = ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	neglcm 11335	Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( -u M lcm N ) = ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	lcmabs 11336	The lcm of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( abs ` M ) lcm ( abs ` N ) ) = ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	lcmgcdlem 11337	Lemma for lcmgcd 11338 and lcmdvds 11339. Prove them for positive M, N, and K. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( ( M lcm N ) x. ( M gcd N ) ) = ( abs ` ( M x. N ) ) /\ ( ( K e. NN /\ ( M || K /\ N || K ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) || K ) ) )
Theorem	lcmgcd 11338	The product of two numbers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the absolute value of the product of the two numbers. In particular, that absolute value is the least common multiple of two coprime numbers, for which ( M gcd N ) = 1. Multiple methods exist for proving this, and it is often proven either as a consequence of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic or of Bézout's identity bezout 11278; see e.g. https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_GCD_and_LCM and https://math.stackexchange.com/a/470827. This proof uses the latter to first confirm it for positive integers M and N (the "Second Proof" in the above Stack Exchange page), then shows that implies it for all nonzero integer inputs, then finally uses lcm0val 11325 to show it applies when either or both inputs are zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) x. ( M gcd N ) ) = ( abs ` ( M x. N ) ) )
Theorem	lcmdvds 11339	The lcm of two integers divides any integer the two divide. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) -> ( M lcm N ) || K ) )
Theorem	lcmid 11340	The lcm of an integer and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M lcm M ) = ( abs ` M ) )
Theorem	lcm1 11341	The lcm of an integer and 1 is the absolute value of the integer. (Contributed by AV, 23-Aug-2020.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M lcm 1 ) = ( abs ` M ) )
Theorem	lcmgcdnn 11342	The product of two positive integers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the product of the two integers. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) x. ( M gcd N ) ) = ( M x. N ) )
Theorem	lcmgcdeq 11343	Two integers' absolute values are equal iff their least common multiple and greatest common divisor are equal. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) = ( M gcd N ) <-> ( abs ` M ) = ( abs ` N ) ) )
Theorem	lcmdvdsb 11344	Biconditional form of lcmdvds 11339. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) <-> ( M lcm N ) || K ) )
Theorem	lcmass 11345	Associative law for lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( N e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ P e. ZZ ) -> ( ( N lcm M ) lcm P ) = ( N lcm ( M lcm P ) ) )
Theorem	3lcm2e6woprm 11346	The least common multiple of three and two is six. This proof does not use the property of 2 and 3 being prime. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( 3 lcm 2 ) = 6
Theorem	6lcm4e12 11347	The least common multiple of six and four is twelve. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( 6 lcm 4 ) = ; 1 2
4.1.9  Coprimality and Euclid's lemma According to Wikipedia "Coprime integers", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprime_integers (16-Aug-2020) "[...] two integers a and b are said to be relatively prime, mutually prime, or coprime [...] if the only positive integer (factor) that divides both of them is 1. Consequently, any prime number that divides one does not divide the other. This is equivalent to their greatest common divisor (gcd) being 1.". In the following, we use this equivalent characterization to say that A e. ZZ and B e. ZZ are coprime (or relatively prime) if ( A gcd B ) = 1. The equivalence of the definitions is shown by coprmgcdb 11348. The negation, i.e. two integers are not coprime, can be expressed either by ( A gcd B ) =/= 1, see ncoprmgcdne1b 11349, or equivalently by 1 < ( A gcd B ), see ncoprmgcdgt1b 11350. A proof of Euclid's lemma based on coprimality is provided in coprmdvds 11352 (as opposed to Euclid's lemma for primes).
Theorem	coprmgcdb 11348*	Two positive integers are coprime, i.e. the only positive integer that divides both of them is 1, iff their greatest common divisor is 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( A. i e. NN ( ( i || A /\ i || B ) -> i = 1 ) <-> ( A gcd B ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	ncoprmgcdne1b 11349*	Two positive integers are not coprime, i.e. there is an integer greater than 1 which divides both integers, iff their greatest common divisor is not 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( E. i e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ( i || A /\ i || B ) <-> ( A gcd B ) =/= 1 ) )
Theorem	ncoprmgcdgt1b 11350*	Two positive integers are not coprime, i.e. there is an integer greater than 1 which divides both integers, iff their greatest common divisor is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( E. i e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ( i || A /\ i || B ) <-> 1 < ( A gcd B ) ) )
Theorem	coprmdvds1 11351	If two positive integers are coprime, i.e. their greatest common divisor is 1, the only positive integer that divides both of them is 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( F e. NN /\ G e. NN /\ ( F gcd G ) = 1 ) -> ( ( I e. NN /\ I || F /\ I || G ) -> I = 1 ) )
Theorem	coprmdvds 11352	Euclid's Lemma (see ProofWiki "Euclid's Lemma", 10-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclid's_Lemma): If an integer divides the product of two integers and is coprime to one of them, then it divides the other. See also theorem 1.5 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K || ( M x. N ) /\ ( K gcd M ) = 1 ) -> K || N ) )
Theorem	coprmdvds2 11353	If an integer is divisible by two coprime integers, then it is divisible by their product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ /\ K e. ZZ ) /\ ( M gcd N ) = 1 ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) -> ( M x. N ) || K ) )
Theorem	mulgcddvds 11354	One half of rpmulgcd2 11355, which does not need the coprimality assumption. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( K gcd ( M x. N ) ) || ( ( K gcd M ) x. ( K gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	rpmulgcd2 11355	If M is relatively prime to N, then the GCD of K with M x. N is the product of the GCDs with M and N respectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.)
|- ( ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ ( M gcd N ) = 1 ) -> ( K gcd ( M x. N ) ) = ( ( K gcd M ) x. ( K gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	qredeq 11356	Two equal reduced fractions have the same numerator and denominator. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Sep-2013.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. NN /\ ( M gcd N ) = 1 ) /\ ( P e. ZZ /\ Q e. NN /\ ( P gcd Q ) = 1 ) /\ ( M / N ) = ( P / Q ) ) -> ( M = P /\ N = Q ) )
Theorem	qredeu 11357*	Every rational number has a unique reduced form. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. QQ -> E! x e. ( ZZ X. NN ) ( ( ( 1st ` x ) gcd ( 2nd ` x ) ) = 1 /\ A = ( ( 1st ` x ) / ( 2nd ` x ) ) ) )
Theorem	rpmul 11358	If K is relatively prime to M and to N, it is also relatively prime to their product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( ( K gcd M ) = 1 /\ ( K gcd N ) = 1 ) -> ( K gcd ( M x. N ) ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	rpdvds 11359	If K is relatively prime to N then it is also relatively prime to any divisor M of N. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ ( ( K gcd N ) = 1 /\ M || N ) ) -> ( K gcd M ) = 1 )
4.1.10  Cancellability of congruences
Theorem	congr 11360*	Definition of congruence by integer multiple (see ProofWiki "Congruence (Number Theory)", 11-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition:Congruence_(Number_Theory)): An integer A is congruent to an integer B modulo M if their difference is a multiple of M. See also the definition in [ApostolNT] p. 104: "... a is congruent to b modulo m, and we write a == b (mod m) if m divides the difference a - b", or Wikipedia "Modular arithmetic - Congruence", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_arithmetic#Congruence, 11-Jul-2021,: "Given an integer n > 1, called a modulus, two integers are said to be congruent modulo n, if n is a divisor of their difference (i.e., if there is an integer k such that a-b = kn)". (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ M e. NN ) -> ( ( A mod M ) = ( B mod M ) <-> E. n e. ZZ ( n x. M ) = ( A - B ) ) )
Theorem	divgcdcoprm0 11361	Integers divided by gcd are coprime. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ B =/= 0 ) -> ( ( A / ( A gcd B ) ) gcd ( B / ( A gcd B ) ) ) = 1 )
Theorem	divgcdcoprmex 11362*	Integers divided by gcd are coprime (see ProofWiki "Integers Divided by GCD are Coprime", 11-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_Divided_by_GCD_are_Coprime): Any pair of integers, not both zero, can be reduced to a pair of coprime ones by dividing them by their gcd. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ ( B e. ZZ /\ B =/= 0 ) /\ M = ( A gcd B ) ) -> E. a e. ZZ E. b e. ZZ ( A = ( M x. a ) /\ B = ( M x. b ) /\ ( a gcd b ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	cncongr1 11363	One direction of the bicondition in cncongr 11365. Theorem 5.4 in [ApostolNT] p. 109. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ C e. ZZ ) /\ ( N e. NN /\ M = ( N / ( C gcd N ) ) ) ) -> ( ( ( A x. C ) mod N ) = ( ( B x. C ) mod N ) -> ( A mod M ) = ( B mod M ) ) )
Theorem	cncongr2 11364	The other direction of the bicondition in cncongr 11365. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ C e. ZZ ) /\ ( N e. NN /\ M = ( N / ( C gcd N ) ) ) ) -> ( ( A mod M ) = ( B mod M ) -> ( ( A x. C ) mod N ) = ( ( B x. C ) mod N ) ) )
Theorem	cncongr 11365	Cancellability of Congruences (see ProofWiki "Cancellability of Congruences, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cancellability_of_Congruences, 10-Jul-2021): Two products with a common factor are congruent modulo a positive integer iff the other factors are congruent modulo the integer divided by the greates common divisor of the integer and the common factor. See also Theorem 5.4 "Cancellation law" in [ApostolNT] p. 109. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ C e. ZZ ) /\ ( N e. NN /\ M = ( N / ( C gcd N ) ) ) ) -> ( ( ( A x. C ) mod N ) = ( ( B x. C ) mod N ) <-> ( A mod M ) = ( B mod M ) ) )
Theorem	cncongrcoprm 11366	Corollary 1 of Cancellability of Congruences: Two products with a common factor are congruent modulo an integer being coprime to the common factor iff the other factors are congruent modulo the integer. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ C e. ZZ ) /\ ( N e. NN /\ ( C gcd N ) = 1 ) ) -> ( ( ( A x. C ) mod N ) = ( ( B x. C ) mod N ) <-> ( A mod N ) = ( B mod N ) ) )
4.2  Elementary prime number theory
4.2.1  Elementary properties Remark: to represent odd prime numbers, i.e., all prime numbers except 2, the idiom P e. ( Prime \ { 2 } ) is used. It is a little bit shorter than ( P e. Prime /\ P =/= 2 ). Both representations can be converted into each other by eldifsn 3567.
Syntax	cprime 11367	Extend the definition of a class to include the set of prime numbers.
class Prime
Definition	df-prm 11368*	Define the set of prime numbers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- Prime = { p e. NN | { n e. NN | n || p } ~~ 2o }
Theorem	isprm 11369*	The predicate "is a prime number". A prime number is a positive integer with exactly two positive divisors. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- ( P e. Prime <-> ( P e. NN /\ { n e. NN | n || P } ~~ 2o ) )
Theorem	prmnn 11370	A prime number is a positive integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- ( P e. Prime -> P e. NN )
Theorem	prmz 11371	A prime number is an integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Jonathan Yan, 16-Jul-2017.)
|- ( P e. Prime -> P e. ZZ )
Theorem	prmssnn 11372	The prime numbers are a subset of the positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)
|- Prime C_ NN
Theorem	prmex 11373	The set of prime numbers exists. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)
|- Prime e. _V
Theorem	1nprm 11374	1 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 3-Jul-2016.)
|- -. 1 e. Prime
Theorem	1idssfct 11375*	The positive divisors of a positive integer include 1 and itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- ( N e. NN -> { 1 , N } C_ { n e. NN | n || N } )
Theorem	isprm2lem 11376*	Lemma for isprm2 11377. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( P e. NN /\ P =/= 1 ) -> ( { n e. NN | n || P } ~~ 2o <-> { n e. NN | n || P } = { 1 , P } ) )
Theorem	isprm2 11377*	The predicate "is a prime number". A prime number is an integer greater than or equal to 2 whose only positive divisors are 1 and itself. Definition in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
|- ( P e. Prime <-> ( P e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) /\ A. z e. NN ( z || P -> ( z = 1 \/ z = P ) ) ) )
Theorem	isprm3 11378*	The predicate "is a prime number". A prime number is an integer greater than or equal to 2 with no divisors strictly between 1 and itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
|- ( P e. Prime <-> ( P e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) /\ A. z e. ( 2 ... ( P - 1 ) ) -. z || P ) )
Theorem	isprm4 11379*	The predicate "is a prime number". A prime number is an integer greater than or equal to 2 whose only divisor greater than or equal to 2 is itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
|- ( P e. Prime <-> ( P e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) /\ A. z e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ( z || P -> z = P ) ) )
Theorem	prmind2 11380*	A variation on prmind 11381 assuming complete induction for primes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
|- ( x = 1 -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y x. z ) -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> et ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( ( x e. Prime /\ A. y e. ( 1 ... ( x - 1 ) ) ch ) -> ph )   &    |- ( ( y e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) /\ z e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ) -> ( ( ch /\ th ) -> ta ) )   =>    |- ( A e. NN -> et )
Theorem	prmind 11381*	Perform induction over the multiplicative structure of NN. If a property ph ( x ) holds for the primes and 1 and is preserved under multiplication, then it holds for every positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
|- ( x = 1 -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y x. z ) -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> et ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( x e. Prime -> ph )   &    |- ( ( y e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) /\ z e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ) -> ( ( ch /\ th ) -> ta ) )   =>    |- ( A e. NN -> et )
Theorem	dvdsprime 11382	If M divides a prime, then M is either the prime or one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( P e. Prime /\ M e. NN ) -> ( M || P <-> ( M = P \/ M = 1 ) ) )
Theorem	nprm 11383	A product of two integers greater than one is composite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) /\ B e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ) -> -. ( A x. B ) e. Prime )
Theorem	nprmi 11384	An inference for compositeness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
|- A e. NN   &    |- B e. NN   &    |- 1 < A   &    |- 1 < B   &    |- ( A x. B ) = N   =>    |- -. N e. Prime
Theorem	dvdsnprmd 11385	If a number is divisible by an integer greater than 1 and less then the number, the number is not prime. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> 1 < A )   &    |- ( ph -> A < N )   &    |- ( ph -> A || N )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. N e. Prime )
Theorem	prm2orodd 11386	A prime number is either 2 or odd. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2021.)
|- ( P e. Prime -> ( P = 2 \/ -. 2 || P ) )
Theorem	2prm 11387	2 is a prime number. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 16-Jun-2016.)
|- 2 e. Prime
Theorem	3prm 11388	3 is a prime number. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- 3 e. Prime
Theorem	4nprm 11389	4 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
|- -. 4 e. Prime
Theorem	prmuz2 11390	A prime number is an integer greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
|- ( P e. Prime -> P e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) )
Theorem	prmgt1 11391	A prime number is an integer greater than 1. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-May-2018.)
|- ( P e. Prime -> 1 < P )
Theorem	prmm2nn0 11392	Subtracting 2 from a prime number results in a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Aug-2018.)
|- ( P e. Prime -> ( P - 2 ) e. NN0 )
Theorem	oddprmgt2 11393	An odd prime is greater than 2. (Contributed by AV, 20-Aug-2021.)
|- ( P e. ( Prime \ { 2 } ) -> 2 < P )
Theorem	oddprmge3 11394	An odd prime is greater than or equal to 3. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 20-Aug-2021.)
|- ( P e. ( Prime \ { 2 } ) -> P e. ( ZZ>= ` 3 ) )
Theorem	sqnprm 11395	A square is never prime. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A e. ZZ -> -. ( A ^ 2 ) e. Prime )
Theorem	dvdsprm 11396	An integer greater than or equal to 2 divides a prime number iff it is equal to it. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) /\ P e. Prime ) -> ( N || P <-> N = P ) )
Theorem	exprmfct 11397*	Every integer greater than or equal to 2 has a prime factor. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
|- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) -> E. p e. Prime p || N )
Theorem	prmdvdsfz 11398*	Each integer greater than 1 and less then or equal to a fixed number is divisible by a prime less then or equal to this fixed number. (Contributed by AV, 15-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( N e. NN /\ I e. ( 2 ... N ) ) -> E. p e. Prime ( p <_ N /\ p || I ) )
Theorem	nprmdvds1 11399	No prime number divides 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.)
|- ( P e. Prime -> -. P || 1 )
Theorem	divgcdodd 11400	Either A / ( A gcd B ) is odd or B / ( A gcd B ) is odd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( -. 2 || ( A / ( A gcd B ) ) \/ -. 2 || ( B / ( A gcd B ) ) ) )