P. 83 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8201-8300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	addcnsr 8201	Addition of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. + <. C , D >. ) = <. ( A +R C ) , ( B +R D ) >. )
Theorem	mulcnsr 8202	Multiplication of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. x. <. C , D >. ) = <. ( ( A .R C ) +R ( -1R .R ( B .R D ) ) ) , ( ( B .R C ) +R ( A .R D ) ) >. )
Theorem	eqresr 8203	Equality of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , 0R >. = <. B , 0R >. <-> A = B )
Theorem	addresr 8204	Addition of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) -> ( <. A , 0R >. + <. B , 0R >. ) = <. ( A +R B ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	mulresr 8205	Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) -> ( <. A , 0R >. x. <. B , 0R >. ) = <. ( A .R B ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	ltresr 8206	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( <. A , 0R >. <RR <. B , 0R >. <-> A <R B )
Theorem	ltresr2 8207	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B <-> ( 1st ` A ) <R ( 1st ` B ) ) )
Theorem	dfcnqs 8208	Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in CC from those in R.. The trick involves qsid 6874, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that CC is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 8185), and allows us to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- CC = ( ( R. X. R. ) /. `' _E )
Theorem	addcnsrec 8209	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 8208 and mulcnsrec 8210. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E + [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( A +R C ) , ( B +R D ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	mulcnsrec 8210	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecidg 6873, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 8208. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E x. [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( ( A .R C ) +R ( -1R .R ( B .R D ) ) ) , ( ( B .R C ) +R ( A .R D ) ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	addvalex 8211	Existence of a sum. This is dependent on how we define + so once we proceed to real number axioms we will replace it with theorems such as addcl 8304. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A + B ) e. _V )
Theorem	pitonnlem1 8212*	Lemma for pitonn 8215. Two ways to write the number one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = 1
Theorem	pitonnlem1p1 8213	Lemma for pitonn 8215. Simplifying an expression involving signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2020.)
|- ( A e. P. -> [ <. ( A +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) , ( 1P +P. 1P ) >. ] ~R = [ <. ( A +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R )
Theorem	pitonnlem2 8214*	Lemma for pitonn 8215. Two ways to add one to a number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- ( K e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. + 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitonn 8215*	Mapping from N. to NN. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } )
Theorem	pitoregt0 8216*	Embedding from N. to RR yields a number greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> 0 <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitore 8217*	Embedding from N. to RR. Similar to pitonn 8215 but separate in the sense that we have not proved nnssre 9308 yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	recnnre 8218*	Embedding the reciprocal of a natural number into RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	peano1nnnn 8219*	One is an element of NN. This is a counterpart to 1nn 9315 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8267). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- 1 e. N
Theorem	peano2nnnn 8220*	A successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. This is a counterpart to peano2nn 9316 designed for real number axioms which involve to natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8267). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ( A + 1 ) e. N )
Theorem	ltrennb 8221*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( J e. N. /\ K e. N. ) -> ( J <N K <-> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) )
Theorem	ltrenn 8222*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2021.)
|- ( J <N K -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	recidpipr 8223*	Another way of saying that a number times its reciprocal is one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. .P. <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. ) = 1P )
Theorem	recidpirqlemcalc 8224	Lemma for recidpirq 8225. Rearranging some of the expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A .P. B ) = 1P )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) +P. ( 1P .P. 1P ) ) +P. 1P ) = ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. 1P ) +P. ( 1P .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) ) +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) )
Theorem	recidpirq 8225*	A real number times its reciprocal is one, where reciprocal is expressed with *Q. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = 1 )
4.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axcnex 8226	The complex numbers form a set. Use cnex 8303 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	axresscn 8227	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 8271. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- RR C_ CC
Theorem	ax1cn 8228	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 8272. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. CC
Theorem	ax1re 8229	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1re 8273. In the Metamath Proof Explorer, this is not a complex number axiom but is proved from ax-1cn 8272 and the other axioms. It is not known whether we can do so here, but the Metamath Proof Explorer proof (accessed 13-Jan-2020) uses excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Theorem	axicn 8230	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 8274. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- _i e. CC
Theorem	axaddcl 8231	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 8275 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 8304. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axaddrcl 8232	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 8276 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 8305. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axmulcl 8233	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 8277 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 8306. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axmulrcl 8234	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 8278 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 8307. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axaddf 8235	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 8231. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 8301. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axmulf 8236	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This is the construction-dependent version of ax-mulf 8302 and it should not be referenced outside the construction. We generally prefer to develop our theory using the less specific mulcl 8306. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axaddcom 8237	Addition is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcom 8279 be used later. Instead, use addcom 8463. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on real number trichotomy and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	axmulcom 8238	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 8280 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 8308. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	axaddass 8239	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 8281 be used later. Instead, use addass 8309. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	axmulass 8240	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 8282. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axdistr 8241	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 8283 be used later. Instead, use adddi 8311. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axi2m1 8242	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 8284. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Theorem	ax0lt1 8243	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0lt1 8285. The version of this axiom in the Metamath Proof Explorer reads 1 =/= 0; here we change it to 0 <RR 1. The proof of 0 <RR 1 from 1 =/= 0 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (accessed 12-Jan-2020) relies on real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Theorem	ax1rid 8244	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 8286. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	ax0id 8245	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0id 8287. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on excluded middle and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	axrnegex 8246*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 8288. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Theorem	axprecex 8247*	Existence of positive reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-precex 8289. In treatments which assume excluded middle, the 0 <RR A condition is generally replaced by A =/= 0, and it may not be necessary to state that the reciproacal is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	axcnre 8248*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 8290. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 8249	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 8291. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 8250	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 8292. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 8251	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 8293. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Theorem	axpre-apti 8252	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 8294. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 8253	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 8295. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 8254	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 8296. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulext 8255	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulext 8297. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Theorem	rereceu 8256*	The reciprocal from axprecex 8247 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E! x e. RR ( A x. x ) = 1 )
Theorem	recriota 8257*	Two ways to express the reciprocal of a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( iota_ r e. RR ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. r ) = 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	axarch 8258*	Archimedean axiom. The Archimedean property is more naturally stated once we have defined NN. Unless we find another way to state it, we'll just use the right hand side of dfnn2 9306 in stating what we mean by "natural number" in the context of this axiom. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-arch 8298. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Theorem	peano5nnnn 8259*	Peano's inductive postulate. This is a counterpart to peano5nni 9307 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8267). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( ( 1 e. A /\ A. z e. A ( z + 1 ) e. A ) -> N C_ A )
Theorem	nnindnn 8260*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). This is a counterpart to nnind 9320 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8267). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( z = 1 -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( z = k -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( k + 1 ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( k e. N -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ta )
Theorem	nntopi 8261*	Mapping from NN to N.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> E. z e. N. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcl 8262*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8267. Mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) e. R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemf 8263*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8267. Mapping to N. and R. yields a sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G : N. --> R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemval 8264*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8267. Value of sequence when mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. ( G ` J ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcau 8265*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8267. The result of mapping to N. and R. satisfies the Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( G ` n ) <R ( ( G ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( G ` k ) <R ( ( G ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvglemres 8266*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8267. Mapping the limit from N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvg 8267*	Real number completeness axiom. A Cauchy sequence with a modulus of convergence converges. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). Because we are stating this axiom before we have introduced notations for NN or division, we use N for the natural numbers and express a reciprocal in terms of iota_. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-caucvg 8299. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploclemres 8268*	Lemma for axpre-suploc 8269. The result. The proof just needs to define B as basically the same set as A (but expressed as a subset of R. rather than a subset of RR), and apply suplocsr 8176. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) )   &    |- B = { w e. R. | <. w , 0R >. e. A }   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploc 8269*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-suploc 8300. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
4.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 8270	The complex numbers form a set. Proofs should normally use cnex 8303 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- CC e. _V
Axiom	ax-resscn 8271	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 8227. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- RR C_ CC
Axiom	ax-1cn 8272	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 8228. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- 1 e. CC
Axiom	ax-1re 8273	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1re 8229. Proofs should use 1re 8325 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Axiom	ax-icn 8274	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 8230. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- _i e. CC
Axiom	ax-addcl 8275	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 8231. Proofs should normally use addcl 8304 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-addrcl 8276	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 8232. Proofs should normally use readdcl 8305 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-mulcl 8277	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 8233. Proofs should normally use mulcl 8306 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 8278	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 8234. Proofs should normally use remulcl 8307 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-addcom 8279	Addition is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcom 8237. Proofs should normally use addcom 8463 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Axiom	ax-mulcom 8280	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 8238. Proofs should normally use mulcom 8308 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Axiom	ax-addass 8281	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 8239. Proofs should normally use addass 8309 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-mulass 8282	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 8240. Proofs should normally use mulass 8310 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-distr 8283	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 8241. Proofs should normally use adddi 8311 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-i2m1 8284	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 8242. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Axiom	ax-0lt1 8285	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0lt1 8243. Proofs should normally use 0lt1 8453 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Axiom	ax-1rid 8286	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 8244. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-0id 8287	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0id 8245. Proofs should normally use addrid 8464 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-rnegex 8288*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 8246. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Axiom	ax-precex 8289*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axprecex 8247. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Axiom	ax-cnre 8290*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 8248. For naming consistency, use cnre 8322 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltirr 8291	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax-pre-ltirr 8291. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltwlin 8292	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltwlin 8250. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 8293	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 8251. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-apti 8294	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-apti 8252. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 8295	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 8253. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 8296	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 8254. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulext 8297	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulext 8255 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Axiom	ax-arch 8298*	Archimedean axiom. Definition 3.1(2) of [Geuvers], p. 9. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axarch 8258. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use arch 9560 (which is the same, but stated in terms of NN and <). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Axiom	ax-caucvg 8299*	Completeness. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcaucvg 8267. A Cauchy sequence (as defined here, which has a rate convergence built in) of real numbers converges to a real number. Specifically on rate of convergence, all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use caucvgre 11747 (which is the same, but stated in terms of the NN and 1 / n notations). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-suploc 8300*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. Although this and ax-caucvg 8299 are both completeness properties, countable choice would probably be needed to derive this from ax-caucvg 8299. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )