P. 127 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 12601-12700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
5.2.10  Infinite primes theorem
Theorem	infpnlem1 12601*	Lemma for infpn 12603. The smallest divisor (greater than 1) M of N ! + 1 is a prime greater than N. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.)
|- K = ( ( ! ` N ) + 1 )   =>    |- ( ( N e. NN /\ M e. NN ) -> ( ( ( 1 < M /\ ( K / M ) e. NN ) /\ A. j e. NN ( ( 1 < j /\ ( K / j ) e. NN ) -> M <_ j ) ) -> ( N < M /\ A. j e. NN ( ( M / j ) e. NN -> ( j = 1 \/ j = M ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	infpnlem2 12602*	Lemma for infpn 12603. For any positive integer N, there exists a prime number j greater than N. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.)
|- K = ( ( ! ` N ) + 1 )   =>    |- ( N e. NN -> E. j e. NN ( N < j /\ A. k e. NN ( ( j / k ) e. NN -> ( k = 1 \/ k = j ) ) ) )
Theorem	infpn 12603*	There exist infinitely many prime numbers: for any positive integer N, there exists a prime number j greater than N. (See infpn2 12746 for the equinumerosity version.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2006.)
|- ( N e. NN -> E. j e. NN ( N < j /\ A. k e. NN ( ( j / k ) e. NN -> ( k = 1 \/ k = j ) ) ) )
Theorem	prmunb 12604*	The primes are unbounded. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.)
|- ( N e. NN -> E. p e. Prime N < p )
5.2.11  Fundamental theorem of arithmetic
Theorem	1arithlem1 12605*	Lemma for 1arith 12609. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- M = ( n e. NN |-> ( p e. Prime |-> ( p pCnt n ) ) )   =>    |- ( N e. NN -> ( M ` N ) = ( p e. Prime |-> ( p pCnt N ) ) )
Theorem	1arithlem2 12606*	Lemma for 1arith 12609. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- M = ( n e. NN |-> ( p e. Prime |-> ( p pCnt n ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( N e. NN /\ P e. Prime ) -> ( ( M ` N ) ` P ) = ( P pCnt N ) )
Theorem	1arithlem3 12607*	Lemma for 1arith 12609. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- M = ( n e. NN |-> ( p e. Prime |-> ( p pCnt n ) ) )   =>    |- ( N e. NN -> ( M ` N ) : Prime --> NN0 )
Theorem	1arithlem4 12608*	Lemma for 1arith 12609. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- M = ( n e. NN |-> ( p e. Prime |-> ( p pCnt n ) ) )   &    |- G = ( y e. NN |-> if ( y e. Prime , ( y ^ ( F ` y ) ) , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> F : Prime --> NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( q e. Prime /\ N <_ q ) ) -> ( F ` q ) = 0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. NN F = ( M ` x ) )
Theorem	1arith 12609*	Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a sequence of prime exponents, for which only finitely many primes have nonzero exponent. The function M maps the set of positive integers one-to-one onto the set of prime factorizations R. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- M = ( n e. NN |-> ( p e. Prime |-> ( p pCnt n ) ) )   &    |- R = { e e. ( NN0 ^m Prime ) | ( `' e " NN ) e. Fin }   =>    |- M : NN -1-1-onto-> R
Theorem	1arith2 12610*	Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a finite monotonic 1-based sequence of primes. Every positive integer has a unique prime factorization. Theorem 1.10 in [ApostolNT] p. 17. This is Metamath 100 proof #80. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- M = ( n e. NN |-> ( p e. Prime |-> ( p pCnt n ) ) )   &    |- R = { e e. ( NN0 ^m Prime ) | ( `' e " NN ) e. Fin }   =>    |- A. z e. NN E! g e. R ( M ` z ) = g
5.2.12  Lagrange's four-square theorem
Syntax	cgz 12611	Extend class notation with the set of gaussian integers.
class ZZ[_i]
Definition	df-gz 12612	Define the set of gaussian integers, which are complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are integers. (Note that the [ _i ] is actually part of the symbol token and has no independent meaning.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- ZZ[_i] = { x e. CC | ( ( Re ` x ) e. ZZ /\ ( Im ` x ) e. ZZ ) }
Theorem	elgz 12613	Elementhood in the gaussian integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- ( A e. ZZ[_i] <-> ( A e. CC /\ ( Re ` A ) e. ZZ /\ ( Im ` A ) e. ZZ ) )
Theorem	gzcn 12614	A gaussian integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- ( A e. ZZ[_i] -> A e. CC )
Theorem	zgz 12615	An integer is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- ( A e. ZZ -> A e. ZZ[_i] )
Theorem	igz 12616	_i is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- _i e. ZZ[_i]
Theorem	gznegcl 12617	The gaussian integers are closed under negation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- ( A e. ZZ[_i] -> -u A e. ZZ[_i] )
Theorem	gzcjcl 12618	The gaussian integers are closed under conjugation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- ( A e. ZZ[_i] -> ( * ` A ) e. ZZ[_i] )
Theorem	gzaddcl 12619	The gaussian integers are closed under addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ[_i] /\ B e. ZZ[_i] ) -> ( A + B ) e. ZZ[_i] )
Theorem	gzmulcl 12620	The gaussian integers are closed under multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ[_i] /\ B e. ZZ[_i] ) -> ( A x. B ) e. ZZ[_i] )
Theorem	gzreim 12621	Construct a gaussian integer from real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) -> ( A + ( _i x. B ) ) e. ZZ[_i] )
Theorem	gzsubcl 12622	The gaussian integers are closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ[_i] /\ B e. ZZ[_i] ) -> ( A - B ) e. ZZ[_i] )
Theorem	gzabssqcl 12623	The squared norm of a gaussian integer is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
|- ( A e. ZZ[_i] -> ( ( abs ` A ) ^ 2 ) e. NN0 )
Theorem	4sqlem5 12624	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- B = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B e. ZZ /\ ( ( A - B ) / M ) e. ZZ ) )
Theorem	4sqlem6 12625	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- B = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( -u ( M / 2 ) <_ B /\ B < ( M / 2 ) ) )
Theorem	4sqlem7 12626	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- B = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B ^ 2 ) <_ ( ( ( M ^ 2 ) / 2 ) / 2 ) )
Theorem	4sqlem8 12627	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- B = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> M || ( ( A ^ 2 ) - ( B ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	4sqlem9 12628	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- B = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( B ^ 2 ) = 0 )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( M ^ 2 ) || ( A ^ 2 ) )
Theorem	4sqlem10 12629	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- B = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( ( ( ( M ^ 2 ) / 2 ) / 2 ) - ( B ^ 2 ) ) = 0 )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( M ^ 2 ) || ( ( A ^ 2 ) - ( ( ( M ^ 2 ) / 2 ) / 2 ) ) )
Theorem	4sqlem1 12630*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. The set S is the set of all numbers that are expressible as a sum of four squares. Our goal is to show that S = NN0; here we show one subset direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   =>    |- S C_ NN0
Theorem	4sqlem2 12631*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. Change bound variables in S. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( A e. S <-> E. a e. ZZ E. b e. ZZ E. c e. ZZ E. d e. ZZ A = ( ( ( a ^ 2 ) + ( b ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( c ^ 2 ) + ( d ^ 2 ) ) ) )
Theorem	4sqlem3 12632*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. Sufficient condition to be in S. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) /\ ( C e. ZZ /\ D e. ZZ ) ) -> ( ( ( A ^ 2 ) + ( B ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( C ^ 2 ) + ( D ^ 2 ) ) ) e. S )
Theorem	4sqlem4a 12633*	Lemma for 4sqlem4 12634. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( A e. ZZ[_i] /\ B e. ZZ[_i] ) -> ( ( ( abs ` A ) ^ 2 ) + ( ( abs ` B ) ^ 2 ) ) e. S )
Theorem	4sqlem4 12634*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. We can express the four-square property more compactly in terms of gaussian integers, because the norms of gaussian integers are exactly sums of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( A e. S <-> E. u e. ZZ[_i] E. v e. ZZ[_i] A = ( ( ( abs ` u ) ^ 2 ) + ( ( abs ` v ) ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	mul4sqlem 12635*	Lemma for mul4sq 12636: algebraic manipulations. The extra assumptions involving M would let us know not just that the product is a sum of squares, but also that it preserves divisibility by M. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> A e. ZZ[_i] )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ[_i] )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. ZZ[_i] )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. ZZ[_i] )   &    |- X = ( ( ( abs ` A ) ^ 2 ) + ( ( abs ` B ) ^ 2 ) )   &    |- Y = ( ( ( abs ` C ) ^ 2 ) + ( ( abs ` D ) ^ 2 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( A - C ) / M ) e. ZZ[_i] )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( B - D ) / M ) e. ZZ[_i] )   &    |- ( ph -> ( X / M ) e. NN0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( X / M ) x. ( Y / M ) ) e. S )
Theorem	mul4sq 12636*	Euler's four-square identity: The product of two sums of four squares is also a sum of four squares. This is usually quoted as an explicit formula involving eight real variables; we save some time by working with complex numbers (gaussian integers) instead, so that we only have to work with four variables, and also hiding the actual formula for the product in the proof of mul4sqlem 12635. (For the curious, the explicit formula that is used is ( | a | ^ 2 + | b | ^ 2 ) ( | c | ^ 2 + | d | ^ 2 ) = | a * x. c + b x. d * | ^ 2 + | a * x. d - b x. c * | ^ 2.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) -> ( A x. B ) e. S )
Theorem	4sqlemafi 12637*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. A is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
|- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN )   &    |- A = { u | E. m e. ( 0 ... N ) u = ( ( m ^ 2 ) mod P ) }   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )
Theorem	4sqlemffi 12638*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. ran F is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
|- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN )   &    |- A = { u | E. m e. ( 0 ... N ) u = ( ( m ^ 2 ) mod P ) }   &    |- F = ( v e. A |-> ( ( P - 1 ) - v ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ran F e. Fin )
Theorem	4sqleminfi 12639*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. A i^i ran F is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
|- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN )   &    |- A = { u | E. m e. ( 0 ... N ) u = ( ( m ^ 2 ) mod P ) }   &    |- F = ( v e. A |-> ( ( P - 1 ) - v ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A i^i ran F ) e. Fin )
Theorem	4sqexercise1 12640*	Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 12642. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ n = ( x ^ 2 ) }   =>    |- ( A e. NN0 -> DECID A e. S )
Theorem	4sqexercise2 12641*	Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 12642. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2025.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ n = ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) }   =>    |- ( A e. NN0 -> DECID A e. S )
Theorem	4sqlemsdc 12642*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. The property of being the sum of four squares is decidable. The proof involves showing that (for a particular A) there are only a finite number of possible ways that it could be the sum of four squares, so checking each of those possibilities in turn decides whether the number is the sum of four squares. If this proof is hard to follow, especially because of its length, the simplified versions at 4sqexercise1 12640 and 4sqexercise2 12641 may help clarify, as they are using very much the same techniques on simplified versions of this lemma. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( A e. NN0 -> DECID A e. S )
Theorem	4sqlem11 12643*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. Use the pigeonhole principle to show that the sets { m ^ 2 | m e. ( 0 ... N ) } and { -u 1 - n ^ 2 | n e. ( 0 ... N ) } have a common element, mod P. Note that although the conclusion is stated in terms of A i^i ran F being nonempty, it is also inhabited by 4sqleminfi 12639 and fin0 6964. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P = ( ( 2 x. N ) + 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. Prime )   &    |- A = { u | E. m e. ( 0 ... N ) u = ( ( m ^ 2 ) mod P ) }   &    |- F = ( v e. A |-> ( ( P - 1 ) - v ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A i^i ran F ) =/= (/) )
Theorem	4sqlem12 12644*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. For any odd prime P, there is a k < P such that k P - 1 is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P = ( ( 2 x. N ) + 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. Prime )   &    |- A = { u | E. m e. ( 0 ... N ) u = ( ( m ^ 2 ) mod P ) }   &    |- F = ( v e. A |-> ( ( P - 1 ) - v ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. k e. ( 1 ... ( P - 1 ) ) E. u e. ZZ[_i] ( ( ( abs ` u ) ^ 2 ) + 1 ) = ( k x. P ) )
Theorem	4sqlem13m 12645*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P = ( ( 2 x. N ) + 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. Prime )   &    |- ( ph -> ( 0 ... ( 2 x. N ) ) C_ S )   &    |- T = { i e. NN | ( i x. P ) e. S }   &    |- M = inf ( T , RR , < )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. j j e. T /\ M < P ) )
Theorem	4sqlem14 12646*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P = ( ( 2 x. N ) + 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. Prime )   &    |- ( ph -> ( 0 ... ( 2 x. N ) ) C_ S )   &    |- T = { i e. NN | ( i x. P ) e. S }   &    |- M = inf ( T , RR , < )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. ZZ )   &    |- E = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- F = ( ( ( B + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- G = ( ( ( C + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- H = ( ( ( D + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- R = ( ( ( ( E ^ 2 ) + ( F ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( G ^ 2 ) + ( H ^ 2 ) ) ) / M )   &    |- ( ph -> ( M x. P ) = ( ( ( A ^ 2 ) + ( B ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( C ^ 2 ) + ( D ^ 2 ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> R e. NN0 )
Theorem	4sqlem15 12647*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P = ( ( 2 x. N ) + 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. Prime )   &    |- ( ph -> ( 0 ... ( 2 x. N ) ) C_ S )   &    |- T = { i e. NN | ( i x. P ) e. S }   &    |- M = inf ( T , RR , < )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. ZZ )   &    |- E = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- F = ( ( ( B + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- G = ( ( ( C + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- H = ( ( ( D + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- R = ( ( ( ( E ^ 2 ) + ( F ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( G ^ 2 ) + ( H ^ 2 ) ) ) / M )   &    |- ( ph -> ( M x. P ) = ( ( ( A ^ 2 ) + ( B ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( C ^ 2 ) + ( D ^ 2 ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ R = M ) -> ( ( ( ( ( ( M ^ 2 ) / 2 ) / 2 ) - ( E ^ 2 ) ) = 0 /\ ( ( ( ( M ^ 2 ) / 2 ) / 2 ) - ( F ^ 2 ) ) = 0 ) /\ ( ( ( ( ( M ^ 2 ) / 2 ) / 2 ) - ( G ^ 2 ) ) = 0 /\ ( ( ( ( M ^ 2 ) / 2 ) / 2 ) - ( H ^ 2 ) ) = 0 ) ) )
Theorem	4sqlem16 12648*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P = ( ( 2 x. N ) + 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. Prime )   &    |- ( ph -> ( 0 ... ( 2 x. N ) ) C_ S )   &    |- T = { i e. NN | ( i x. P ) e. S }   &    |- M = inf ( T , RR , < )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. ZZ )   &    |- E = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- F = ( ( ( B + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- G = ( ( ( C + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- H = ( ( ( D + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- R = ( ( ( ( E ^ 2 ) + ( F ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( G ^ 2 ) + ( H ^ 2 ) ) ) / M )   &    |- ( ph -> ( M x. P ) = ( ( ( A ^ 2 ) + ( B ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( C ^ 2 ) + ( D ^ 2 ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( R <_ M /\ ( ( R = 0 \/ R = M ) -> ( M ^ 2 ) || ( M x. P ) ) ) )
Theorem	4sqlem17 12649*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P = ( ( 2 x. N ) + 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. Prime )   &    |- ( ph -> ( 0 ... ( 2 x. N ) ) C_ S )   &    |- T = { i e. NN | ( i x. P ) e. S }   &    |- M = inf ( T , RR , < )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. ZZ )   &    |- E = ( ( ( A + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- F = ( ( ( B + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- G = ( ( ( C + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- H = ( ( ( D + ( M / 2 ) ) mod M ) - ( M / 2 ) )   &    |- R = ( ( ( ( E ^ 2 ) + ( F ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( G ^ 2 ) + ( H ^ 2 ) ) ) / M )   &    |- ( ph -> ( M x. P ) = ( ( ( A ^ 2 ) + ( B ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( C ^ 2 ) + ( D ^ 2 ) ) ) )   =>    |- -. ph
Theorem	4sqlem18 12650*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. Inductive step, odd prime case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P = ( ( 2 x. N ) + 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. Prime )   &    |- ( ph -> ( 0 ... ( 2 x. N ) ) C_ S )   &    |- T = { i e. NN | ( i x. P ) e. S }   &    |- M = inf ( T , RR , < )   =>    |- ( ph -> P e. S )
Theorem	4sqlem19 12651*	Lemma for 4sq 12652. The proof is by strong induction - we show that if all the integers less than k are in S, then k is as well. In this part of the proof we do the induction argument and dispense with all the cases except the odd prime case, which is sent to 4sqlem18 12650. If k is 0 , 1 , 2, we show k e. S directly; otherwise if k is composite, k is the product of two numbers less than it (and hence in S by assumption), so by mul4sq 12636 k e. S. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   =>    |- NN0 = S
Theorem	4sq 12652*	Lagrange's four-square theorem, or Bachet's conjecture: every nonnegative integer is expressible as a sum of four squares. This is Metamath 100 proof #19. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
|- ( A e. NN0 <-> E. a e. ZZ E. b e. ZZ E. c e. ZZ E. d e. ZZ A = ( ( ( a ^ 2 ) + ( b ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( c ^ 2 ) + ( d ^ 2 ) ) ) )
5.2.13  Decimal arithmetic (cont.)
Theorem	dec2dvds 12653	Divisibility by two is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. NN0   &    |- B e. NN0   &    |- ( B x. 2 ) = C   &    |- D = ( C + 1 )   =>    |- -. 2 || ; A D
Theorem	dec5dvds 12654	Divisibility by five is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. NN0   &    |- B e. NN   &    |- B < 5   =>    |- -. 5 || ; A B
Theorem	dec5dvds2 12655	Divisibility by five is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. NN0   &    |- B e. NN   &    |- B < 5   &    |- ( 5 + B ) = C   =>    |- -. 5 || ; A C
Theorem	dec5nprm 12656	A decimal number greater than 10 and ending with five is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. NN   =>    |- -. ; A 5 e. Prime
Theorem	dec2nprm 12657	A decimal number greater than 10 and ending with an even digit is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. NN   &    |- B e. NN0   &    |- ( B x. 2 ) = C   =>    |- -. ; A C e. Prime
Theorem	modxai 12658	Add exponents in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Feb-2015.)
|- N e. NN   &    |- A e. NN   &    |- B e. NN0   &    |- D e. ZZ   &    |- K e. NN0   &    |- M e. NN0   &    |- C e. NN0   &    |- L e. NN0   &    |- ( ( A ^ B ) mod N ) = ( K mod N )   &    |- ( ( A ^ C ) mod N ) = ( L mod N )   &    |- ( B + C ) = E   &    |- ( ( D x. N ) + M ) = ( K x. L )   =>    |- ( ( A ^ E ) mod N ) = ( M mod N )
Theorem	mod2xi 12659	Double exponents in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.)
|- N e. NN   &    |- A e. NN   &    |- B e. NN0   &    |- D e. ZZ   &    |- K e. NN0   &    |- M e. NN0   &    |- ( ( A ^ B ) mod N ) = ( K mod N )   &    |- ( 2 x. B ) = E   &    |- ( ( D x. N ) + M ) = ( K x. K )   =>    |- ( ( A ^ E ) mod N ) = ( M mod N )
Theorem	modxp1i 12660	Add one to an exponent in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.)
|- N e. NN   &    |- A e. NN   &    |- B e. NN0   &    |- D e. ZZ   &    |- K e. NN0   &    |- M e. NN0   &    |- ( ( A ^ B ) mod N ) = ( K mod N )   &    |- ( B + 1 ) = E   &    |- ( ( D x. N ) + M ) = ( K x. A )   =>    |- ( ( A ^ E ) mod N ) = ( M mod N )
Theorem	modsubi 12661	Subtract from within a mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
|- N e. NN   &    |- A e. NN   &    |- B e. NN0   &    |- M e. NN0   &    |- ( A mod N ) = ( K mod N )   &    |- ( M + B ) = K   =>    |- ( ( A - B ) mod N ) = ( M mod N )
Theorem	gcdi 12662	Calculate a GCD via Euclid's algorithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.)
|- K e. NN0   &    |- R e. NN0   &    |- N e. NN0   &    |- ( N gcd R ) = G   &    |- ( ( K x. N ) + R ) = M   =>    |- ( M gcd N ) = G
Theorem	gcdmodi 12663	Calculate a GCD via Euclid's algorithm. Theorem 5.6 in [ApostolNT] p. 109. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.)
|- K e. NN0   &    |- R e. NN0   &    |- N e. NN   &    |- ( K mod N ) = ( R mod N )   &    |- ( N gcd R ) = G   =>    |- ( K gcd N ) = G
Theorem	numexp0 12664	Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. NN0   =>    |- ( A ^ 0 ) = 1
Theorem	numexp1 12665	Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. NN0   =>    |- ( A ^ 1 ) = A
Theorem	numexpp1 12666	Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. NN0   &    |- M e. NN0   &    |- ( M + 1 ) = N   &    |- ( ( A ^ M ) x. A ) = C   =>    |- ( A ^ N ) = C
Theorem	numexp2x 12667	Double an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. NN0   &    |- M e. NN0   &    |- ( 2 x. M ) = N   &    |- ( A ^ M ) = D   &    |- ( D x. D ) = C   =>    |- ( A ^ N ) = C
Theorem	decsplit0b 12668	Split a decimal number into two parts. Base case: N = 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- A e. NN0   =>    |- ( ( A x. (; 1 0 ^ 0 ) ) + B ) = ( A + B )
Theorem	decsplit0 12669	Split a decimal number into two parts. Base case: N = 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- A e. NN0   =>    |- ( ( A x. (; 1 0 ^ 0 ) ) + 0 ) = A
Theorem	decsplit1 12670	Split a decimal number into two parts. Base case: N = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- A e. NN0   =>    |- ( ( A x. (; 1 0 ^ 1 ) ) + B ) = ; A B
Theorem	decsplit 12671	Split a decimal number into two parts. Inductive step. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- A e. NN0   &    |- B e. NN0   &    |- D e. NN0   &    |- M e. NN0   &    |- ( M + 1 ) = N   &    |- ( ( A x. (; 1 0 ^ M ) ) + B ) = C   =>    |- ( ( A x. (; 1 0 ^ N ) ) + ; B D ) = ; C D
Theorem	karatsuba 12672	The Karatsuba multiplication algorithm. If X and Y are decomposed into two groups of digits of length M (only the lower group is known to be this size but the algorithm is most efficient when the partition is chosen near the middle of the digit string), then X Y can be written in three groups of digits, where each group needs only one multiplication. Thus, we can halve both inputs with only three multiplications on the smaller operands, yielding an asymptotic improvement of n^(log2 3) instead of n^2 for the "naive" algorithm decmul1c 9550. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
|- A e. NN0   &    |- B e. NN0   &    |- C e. NN0   &    |- D e. NN0   &    |- S e. NN0   &    |- M e. NN0   &    |- ( A x. C ) = R   &    |- ( B x. D ) = T   &    |- ( ( A + B ) x. ( C + D ) ) = ( ( R + S ) + T )   &    |- ( ( A x. (; 1 0 ^ M ) ) + B ) = X   &    |- ( ( C x. (; 1 0 ^ M ) ) + D ) = Y   &    |- ( ( R x. (; 1 0 ^ M ) ) + S ) = W   &    |- ( ( W x. (; 1 0 ^ M ) ) + T ) = Z   =>    |- ( X x. Y ) = Z
Theorem	2exp4 12673	Two to the fourth power is 16. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
|- ( 2 ^ 4 ) = ; 1 6
Theorem	2exp5 12674	Two to the fifth power is 32. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
|- ( 2 ^ 5 ) = ; 3 2
Theorem	2exp6 12675	Two to the sixth power is 64. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.)
|- ( 2 ^ 6 ) = ; 6 4
Theorem	2exp7 12676	Two to the seventh power is 128. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
|- ( 2 ^ 7 ) = ;; 1 2 8
Theorem	2exp8 12677	Two to the eighth power is 256. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
|- ( 2 ^ 8 ) = ;; 2 5 6
Theorem	2exp11 12678	Two to the eleventh power is 2048. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
|- ( 2 ^; 1 1 ) = ;;; 2 0 4 8
Theorem	2exp16 12679	Two to the sixteenth power is 65536. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
|- ( 2 ^; 1 6 ) = ;;;; 6 5 5 3 6
Theorem	3exp3 12680	Three to the third power is 27. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
|- ( 3 ^ 3 ) = ; 2 7
Theorem	2expltfac 12681	The factorial grows faster than two to the power N. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2016.)
|- ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` 4 ) -> ( 2 ^ N ) < ( ! ` N ) )
5.3  Cardinality of real and complex number subsets
5.3.1  Countability of integers and rationals
Theorem	oddennn 12682	There are as many odd positive integers as there are positive integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2022.)
|- { z e. NN | -. 2 || z } ~~ NN
Theorem	evenennn 12683	There are as many even positive integers as there are positive integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2022.)
|- { z e. NN | 2 || z } ~~ NN
Theorem	xpnnen 12684	The Cartesian product of the set of positive integers with itself is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
|- ( NN X. NN ) ~~ NN
Theorem	xpomen 12685	The Cartesian product of omega (the set of ordinal natural numbers) with itself is equinumerous to omega. Exercise 1 of [Enderton] p. 133. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
|- ( om X. om ) ~~ om
Theorem	xpct 12686	The cartesian product of two sets dominated by om is dominated by om. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2017.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ om /\ B ~<_ om ) -> ( A X. B ) ~<_ om )
Theorem	unennn 12687	The union of two disjoint countably infinite sets is countably infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2022.)
|- ( ( A ~~ NN /\ B ~~ NN /\ ( A i^i B ) = (/) ) -> ( A u. B ) ~~ NN )
Theorem	znnen 12688	The set of integers and the set of positive integers are equinumerous. Corollary 8.1.23 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.)
|- ZZ ~~ NN
Theorem	ennnfonelemdc 12689*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. A direct consequence of fidcenumlemrk 7038. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. om )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID ( F ` P ) e. ( F " P ) )
Theorem	ennnfonelemk 12690*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> K e. om )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. j e. suc N ( F ` K ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> N e. K )
Theorem	ennnfonelemj0 12691*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. Initial state for J. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( J ` 0 ) e. { g e. ( A ^pm om ) | dom g e. om } )
Theorem	ennnfonelemjn 12692*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. Non-initial state for J. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ f e. ( ZZ>= ` ( 0 + 1 ) ) ) -> ( J ` f ) e. om )
Theorem	ennnfonelemg 12693*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. Closure for G. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( f e. { g e. ( A ^pm om ) | dom g e. om } /\ j e. om ) ) -> ( f G j ) e. { g e. ( A ^pm om ) | dom g e. om } )
Theorem	ennnfonelemh 12694*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   =>    |- ( ph -> H : NN0 --> ( A ^pm om ) )
Theorem	ennnfonelem0 12695*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. Initial value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( H ` 0 ) = (/) )
Theorem	ennnfonelemp1 12696*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. Value of H at a successor. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( H ` ( P + 1 ) ) = if ( ( F ` ( `' N ` P ) ) e. ( F " ( `' N ` P ) ) , ( H ` P ) , ( ( H ` P ) u. { <. dom ( H ` P ) , ( F ` ( `' N ` P ) ) >. } ) ) )
Theorem	ennnfonelem1 12697*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. Second value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( H ` 1 ) = { <. (/) , ( F ` (/) ) >. } )
Theorem	ennnfonelemom 12698*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. H yields finite sequences. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> dom ( H ` P ) e. om )
Theorem	ennnfonelemhdmp1 12699*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. Domain at a successor where we need to add an element to the sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> -. ( F ` ( `' N ` P ) ) e. ( F " ( `' N ` P ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> dom ( H ` ( P + 1 ) ) = suc dom ( H ` P ) )
Theorem	ennnfonelemss 12700*	Lemma for ennnfone 12715. We only add elements to H as the index increases. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> F : om -onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. om E. k e. om A. j e. suc n ( F ` k ) =/= ( F ` j ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. ( A ^pm om ) , y e. om |-> if ( ( F ` y ) e. ( F " y ) , x , ( x u. { <. dom x , ( F ` y ) >. } ) ) )   &    |- N = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- J = ( x e. NN0 |-> if ( x = 0 , (/) , ( `' N ` ( x - 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- H = seq 0 ( G , J )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( H ` P ) C_ ( H ` ( P + 1 ) ) )