P. 80 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Syntax	cmul 7901	Multiplication on complex numbers. The token x. is a center dot.
class x.
Definition	df-c 7902	Define the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- CC = ( R. X. R. )
Definition	df-0 7903	Define the complex number 0. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- 0 = <. 0R , 0R >.
Definition	df-1 7904	Define the complex number 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- 1 = <. 1R , 0R >.
Definition	df-i 7905	Define the complex number _i (the imaginary unit). (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- _i = <. 0R , 1R >.
Definition	df-r 7906	Define the set of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- RR = ( R. X. { 0R } )
Definition	df-add 7907*	Define addition over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- + = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. CC /\ y e. CC ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = <. ( w +R u ) , ( v +R f ) >. ) ) }
Definition	df-mul 7908*	Define multiplication over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|- x. = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. CC /\ y e. CC ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = <. ( ( w .R u ) +R ( -1R .R ( v .R f ) ) ) , ( ( v .R u ) +R ( w .R f ) ) >. ) ) }
Definition	df-lt 7909*	Define 'less than' on the real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- <RR = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. RR /\ y e. RR ) /\ E. z E. w ( ( x = <. z , 0R >. /\ y = <. w , 0R >. ) /\ z <R w ) ) }
Theorem	opelcn 7910	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.)
|- ( <. A , B >. e. CC <-> ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) )
Theorem	opelreal 7911	Ordered pair membership in class of real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( <. A , 0R >. e. RR <-> A e. R. )
Theorem	elreal 7912*	Membership in class of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
|- ( A e. RR <-> E. x e. R. <. x , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	elrealeu 7913*	The real number mapping in elreal 7912 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( A e. RR <-> E! x e. R. <. x , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	elreal2 7914	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
|- ( A e. RR <-> ( ( 1st ` A ) e. R. /\ A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , 0R >. ) )
Theorem	0ncn 7915	The empty set is not a complex number. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. See also cnm 7916 which is a related property. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.)
|- -. (/) e. CC
Theorem	cnm 7916*	A complex number is an inhabited set. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x x e. A )
Theorem	ltrelre 7917	'Less than' is a relation on real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- <RR C_ ( RR X. RR )
Theorem	addcnsr 7918	Addition of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. + <. C , D >. ) = <. ( A +R C ) , ( B +R D ) >. )
Theorem	mulcnsr 7919	Multiplication of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. x. <. C , D >. ) = <. ( ( A .R C ) +R ( -1R .R ( B .R D ) ) ) , ( ( B .R C ) +R ( A .R D ) ) >. )
Theorem	eqresr 7920	Equality of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , 0R >. = <. B , 0R >. <-> A = B )
Theorem	addresr 7921	Addition of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) -> ( <. A , 0R >. + <. B , 0R >. ) = <. ( A +R B ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	mulresr 7922	Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) -> ( <. A , 0R >. x. <. B , 0R >. ) = <. ( A .R B ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	ltresr 7923	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( <. A , 0R >. <RR <. B , 0R >. <-> A <R B )
Theorem	ltresr2 7924	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B <-> ( 1st ` A ) <R ( 1st ` B ) ) )
Theorem	dfcnqs 7925	Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in CC from those in R.. The trick involves qsid 6668, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that CC is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 7902), and allows us to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- CC = ( ( R. X. R. ) /. `' _E )
Theorem	addcnsrec 7926	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 7925 and mulcnsrec 7927. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E + [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( A +R C ) , ( B +R D ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	mulcnsrec 7927	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecidg 6667, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 7925. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E x. [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( ( A .R C ) +R ( -1R .R ( B .R D ) ) ) , ( ( B .R C ) +R ( A .R D ) ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	addvalex 7928	Existence of a sum. This is dependent on how we define + so once we proceed to real number axioms we will replace it with theorems such as addcl 8021. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A + B ) e. _V )
Theorem	pitonnlem1 7929*	Lemma for pitonn 7932. Two ways to write the number one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = 1
Theorem	pitonnlem1p1 7930	Lemma for pitonn 7932. Simplifying an expression involving signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2020.)
|- ( A e. P. -> [ <. ( A +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) , ( 1P +P. 1P ) >. ] ~R = [ <. ( A +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R )
Theorem	pitonnlem2 7931*	Lemma for pitonn 7932. Two ways to add one to a number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- ( K e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. + 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitonn 7932*	Mapping from N. to NN. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } )
Theorem	pitoregt0 7933*	Embedding from N. to RR yields a number greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> 0 <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitore 7934*	Embedding from N. to RR. Similar to pitonn 7932 but separate in the sense that we have not proved nnssre 9011 yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	recnnre 7935*	Embedding the reciprocal of a natural number into RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	peano1nnnn 7936*	One is an element of NN. This is a counterpart to 1nn 9018 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7984). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- 1 e. N
Theorem	peano2nnnn 7937*	A successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. This is a counterpart to peano2nn 9019 designed for real number axioms which involve to natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7984). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ( A + 1 ) e. N )
Theorem	ltrennb 7938*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( J e. N. /\ K e. N. ) -> ( J <N K <-> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) )
Theorem	ltrenn 7939*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2021.)
|- ( J <N K -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	recidpipr 7940*	Another way of saying that a number times its reciprocal is one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. .P. <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. ) = 1P )
Theorem	recidpirqlemcalc 7941	Lemma for recidpirq 7942. Rearranging some of the expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A .P. B ) = 1P )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) +P. ( 1P .P. 1P ) ) +P. 1P ) = ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. 1P ) +P. ( 1P .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) ) +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) )
Theorem	recidpirq 7942*	A real number times its reciprocal is one, where reciprocal is expressed with *Q. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = 1 )
4.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axcnex 7943	The complex numbers form a set. Use cnex 8020 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	axresscn 7944	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 7988. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- RR C_ CC
Theorem	ax1cn 7945	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 7989. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. CC
Theorem	ax1re 7946	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1re 7990. In the Metamath Proof Explorer, this is not a complex number axiom but is proved from ax-1cn 7989 and the other axioms. It is not known whether we can do so here, but the Metamath Proof Explorer proof (accessed 13-Jan-2020) uses excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Theorem	axicn 7947	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 7991. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- _i e. CC
Theorem	axaddcl 7948	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 7992 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 8021. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axaddrcl 7949	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 7993 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 8022. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axmulcl 7950	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 7994 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 8023. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axmulrcl 7951	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 7995 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 8024. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axaddf 7952	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 7948. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 8018. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axmulf 7953	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This is the construction-dependent version of ax-mulf 8019 and it should not be referenced outside the construction. We generally prefer to develop our theory using the less specific mulcl 8023. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axaddcom 7954	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcom 7996 be used later. Instead, use addcom 8180. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on real number trichotomy and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	axmulcom 7955	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 7997 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 8025. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	axaddass 7956	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 7998 be used later. Instead, use addass 8026. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	axmulass 7957	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 7999. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axdistr 7958	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 8000 be used later. Instead, use adddi 8028. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axi2m1 7959	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 8001. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Theorem	ax0lt1 7960	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0lt1 8002. The version of this axiom in the Metamath Proof Explorer reads 1 =/= 0; here we change it to 0 <RR 1. The proof of 0 <RR 1 from 1 =/= 0 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (accessed 12-Jan-2020) relies on real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Theorem	ax1rid 7961	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 8003. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	ax0id 7962	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0id 8004. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on excluded middle and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	axrnegex 7963*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 8005. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Theorem	axprecex 7964*	Existence of positive reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-precex 8006. In treatments which assume excluded middle, the 0 <RR A condition is generally replaced by A =/= 0, and it may not be necessary to state that the reciproacal is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	axcnre 7965*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 8007. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 7966	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 8008. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 7967	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 8009. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 7968	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 8010. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Theorem	axpre-apti 7969	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 8011. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 7970	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 8012. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 7971	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 8013. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulext 7972	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulext 8014. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Theorem	rereceu 7973*	The reciprocal from axprecex 7964 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E! x e. RR ( A x. x ) = 1 )
Theorem	recriota 7974*	Two ways to express the reciprocal of a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( iota_ r e. RR ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. r ) = 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	axarch 7975*	Archimedean axiom. The Archimedean property is more naturally stated once we have defined NN. Unless we find another way to state it, we'll just use the right hand side of dfnn2 9009 in stating what we mean by "natural number" in the context of this axiom. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-arch 8015. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Theorem	peano5nnnn 7976*	Peano's inductive postulate. This is a counterpart to peano5nni 9010 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7984). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( ( 1 e. A /\ A. z e. A ( z + 1 ) e. A ) -> N C_ A )
Theorem	nnindnn 7977*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). This is a counterpart to nnind 9023 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7984). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( z = 1 -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( z = k -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( k + 1 ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( k e. N -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ta )
Theorem	nntopi 7978*	Mapping from NN to N.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> E. z e. N. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcl 7979*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7984. Mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) e. R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemf 7980*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7984. Mapping to N. and R. yields a sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G : N. --> R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemval 7981*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7984. Value of sequence when mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. ( G ` J ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcau 7982*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7984. The result of mapping to N. and R. satisfies the Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( G ` n ) <R ( ( G ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( G ` k ) <R ( ( G ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvglemres 7983*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7984. Mapping the limit from N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvg 7984*	Real number completeness axiom. A Cauchy sequence with a modulus of convergence converges. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). Because we are stating this axiom before we have introduced notations for NN or division, we use N for the natural numbers and express a reciprocal in terms of iota_. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-caucvg 8016. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploclemres 7985*	Lemma for axpre-suploc 7986. The result. The proof just needs to define B as basically the same set as A (but expressed as a subset of R. rather than a subset of RR), and apply suplocsr 7893. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) )   &    |- B = { w e. R. | <. w , 0R >. e. A }   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploc 7986*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-suploc 8017. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
4.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 7987	The complex numbers form a set. Proofs should normally use cnex 8020 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- CC e. _V
Axiom	ax-resscn 7988	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 7944. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- RR C_ CC
Axiom	ax-1cn 7989	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 7945. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- 1 e. CC
Axiom	ax-1re 7990	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1re 7946. Proofs should use 1re 8042 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Axiom	ax-icn 7991	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 7947. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- _i e. CC
Axiom	ax-addcl 7992	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 7948. Proofs should normally use addcl 8021 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-addrcl 7993	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 7949. Proofs should normally use readdcl 8022 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-mulcl 7994	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 7950. Proofs should normally use mulcl 8023 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 7995	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 7951. Proofs should normally use remulcl 8024 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-addcom 7996	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcom 7954. Proofs should normally use addcom 8180 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Axiom	ax-mulcom 7997	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 7955. Proofs should normally use mulcom 8025 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Axiom	ax-addass 7998	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 7956. Proofs should normally use addass 8026 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-mulass 7999	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 7957. Proofs should normally use mulass 8027 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-distr 8000	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 7958. Proofs should normally use adddi 8028 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )