P. 82 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8101-8200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	prsradd 8101	Mapping from positive real addition to signed real addition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. P. /\ B e. P. ) -> [ <. ( ( A +P. B ) +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R = ( [ <. ( A +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R +R [ <. ( B +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) )
Theorem	prsrlt 8102	Mapping from positive real ordering to signed real ordering. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. P. /\ B e. P. ) -> ( A <P B <-> [ <. ( A +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R <R [ <. ( B +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) )
Theorem	prsrriota 8103*	Mapping a restricted iota from a positive real to a signed real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ 0R <R A ) -> [ <. ( ( iota_ x e. P. [ <. ( x +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R = A ) +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R = A )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemcl 8104*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Terms of the sequence from caucvgsrlemgt1 8110 can be mapped to positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. 1R <R ( F ` m ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ A e. N. ) -> ( iota_ y e. P. ( F ` A ) = [ <. ( y +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) e. P. )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemasr 8105*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. The lower bound is a signed real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A. m e. N. A <R ( F ` m ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. R. )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemfv 8106*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Coercing sequence value from a positive real to a signed real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. 1R <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. N. |-> ( iota_ y e. P. ( F ` x ) = [ <. ( y +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ A e. N. ) -> [ <. ( ( G ` A ) +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R = ( F ` A ) )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemf 8107*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Defining the sequence in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. 1R <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. N. |-> ( iota_ y e. P. ( F ` x ) = [ <. ( y +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G : N. --> P. )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemcau 8108*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Defining the Cauchy condition in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. 1R <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. N. |-> ( iota_ y e. P. ( F ` x ) = [ <. ( y +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( G ` n ) <P ( ( G ` k ) +P. <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. ) /\ ( G ` k ) <P ( ( G ` n ) +P. <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. ) ) ) )
Theorem	caucvgsrlembound 8109*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Defining the boundedness condition in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. 1R <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( x e. N. |-> ( iota_ y e. P. ( F ` x ) = [ <. ( y +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. 1P <P ( G ` m ) )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemgt1 8110*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. A Cauchy sequence whose terms are greater than one converges. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. 1R <R ( F ` m ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. R. A. x e. R. ( 0R <R x -> E. j e. N. A. i e. N. ( j <N i -> ( ( F ` i ) <R ( y +R x ) /\ y <R ( ( F ` i ) +R x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemoffval 8111*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Offsetting the values of the sequence so they are greater than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. A <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( a e. N. |-> ( ( ( F ` a ) +R 1R ) +R ( A .R -1R ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( ( G ` J ) +R A ) = ( ( F ` J ) +R 1R ) )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemofff 8112*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Offsetting the values of the sequence so they are greater than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. A <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( a e. N. |-> ( ( ( F ` a ) +R 1R ) +R ( A .R -1R ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G : N. --> R. )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemoffcau 8113*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Offsetting the values of the sequence so they are greater than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. A <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( a e. N. |-> ( ( ( F ` a ) +R 1R ) +R ( A .R -1R ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( G ` n ) <R ( ( G ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( G ` k ) <R ( ( G ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemoffgt1 8114*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Offsetting the values of the sequence so they are greater than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. A <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( a e. N. |-> ( ( ( F ` a ) +R 1R ) +R ( A .R -1R ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. 1R <R ( G ` m ) )
Theorem	caucvgsrlemoffres 8115*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. Offsetting the values of the sequence so they are greater than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. A <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( a e. N. |-> ( ( ( F ` a ) +R 1R ) +R ( A .R -1R ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. R. A. x e. R. ( 0R <R x -> E. j e. N. A. k e. N. ( j <N k -> ( ( F ` k ) <R ( y +R x ) /\ y <R ( ( F ` k ) +R x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	caucvgsrlembnd 8116*	Lemma for caucvgsr 8117. A Cauchy sequence with a lower bound converges. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. A <R ( F ` m ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. R. A. x e. R. ( 0R <R x -> E. j e. N. A. k e. N. ( j <N k -> ( ( F ` k ) <R ( y +R x ) /\ y <R ( ( F ` k ) +R x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	caucvgsr 8117*	A Cauchy sequence of signed reals with a modulus of convergence converges to a signed real. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). This is similar to caucvgprpr 8027 but is for signed reals rather than positive reals. Here is an outline of how we prove it: 1. Choose a lower bound for the sequence (see caucvgsrlembnd 8116). 2. Offset each element of the sequence so that each element of the resulting sequence is greater than one (greater than zero would not suffice, because the limit as well as the elements of the sequence need to be positive) (see caucvgsrlemofff 8112). 3. Since a signed real (element of R.) which is greater than zero can be mapped to a positive real (element of P.), perform that mapping on each element of the sequence and invoke caucvgprpr 8027 to get a limit (see caucvgsrlemgt1 8110). 4. Map the resulting limit from positive reals back to signed reals (see caucvgsrlemgt1 8110). 5. Offset that limit so that we get the limit of the original sequence rather than the limit of the offsetted sequence (see caucvgsrlemoffres 8115). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. R. A. x e. R. ( 0R <R x -> E. j e. N. A. k e. N. ( j <N k -> ( ( F ` k ) <R ( y +R x ) /\ y <R ( ( F ` k ) +R x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	ltpsrprg 8118	Mapping of order from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. P. /\ B e. P. /\ C e. R. ) -> ( ( C +R [ <. A , 1P >. ] ~R ) <R ( C +R [ <. B , 1P >. ] ~R ) <-> A <P B ) )
Theorem	mappsrprg 8119	Mapping from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. P. /\ C e. R. ) -> ( C +R -1R ) <R ( C +R [ <. A , 1P >. ] ~R ) )
Theorem	map2psrprg 8120*	Equivalence for positive signed real. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
|- ( C e. R. -> ( ( C +R -1R ) <R A <-> E. x e. P. ( C +R [ <. x , 1P >. ] ~R ) = A ) )
Theorem	suplocsrlemb 8121*	Lemma for suplocsr 8124. The set B is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2024.)
|- B = { w e. P. | ( C +R [ <. w , 1P >. ] ~R ) e. A }   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ R. )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. A. y e. A y <R x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. R. A. y e. R. ( x <R y -> ( E. z e. A x <R z \/ A. z e. A z <R y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. u e. P. A. v e. P. ( u <P v -> ( E. q e. B u <P q \/ A. q e. B q <P v ) ) )
Theorem	suplocsrlempr 8122*	Lemma for suplocsr 8124. The set B has a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2024.)
|- B = { w e. P. | ( C +R [ <. w , 1P >. ] ~R ) e. A }   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ R. )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. A. y e. A y <R x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. R. A. y e. R. ( x <R y -> ( E. z e. A x <R z \/ A. z e. A z <R y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. v e. P. ( A. w e. B -. v <P w /\ A. w e. P. ( w <P v -> E. u e. B w <P u ) ) )
Theorem	suplocsrlem 8123*	Lemma for suplocsr 8124. The set A has a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2024.)
|- B = { w e. P. | ( C +R [ <. w , 1P >. ] ~R ) e. A }   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ R. )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. A. y e. A y <R x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. R. A. y e. R. ( x <R y -> ( E. z e. A x <R z \/ A. z e. A z <R y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. ( A. y e. A -. x <R y /\ A. y e. R. ( y <R x -> E. z e. A y <R z ) ) )
Theorem	suplocsr 8124*	An inhabited, bounded, located set of signed reals has a supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ph -> E. x x e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. A. y e. A y <R x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. R. A. y e. R. ( x <R y -> ( E. z e. A x <R z \/ A. z e. A z <R y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. ( A. y e. A -. x <R y /\ A. y e. R. ( y <R x -> E. z e. A y <R z ) ) )
Syntax	cc 8125	Class of complex numbers.
class CC
Syntax	cr 8126	Class of real numbers.
class RR
Syntax	cc0 8127	Extend class notation to include the complex number 0.
class 0
Syntax	c1 8128	Extend class notation to include the complex number 1.
class 1
Syntax	ci 8129	Extend class notation to include the complex number i.
class _i
Syntax	caddc 8130	Addition on complex numbers.
class +
Syntax	cltrr 8131	'Less than' predicate (defined over real subset of complex numbers).
class <RR
Syntax	cmul 8132	Multiplication on complex numbers. The token x. is a center dot.
class x.
Definition	df-c 8133	Define the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- CC = ( R. X. R. )
Definition	df-0 8134	Define the complex number 0. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- 0 = <. 0R , 0R >.
Definition	df-1 8135	Define the complex number 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- 1 = <. 1R , 0R >.
Definition	df-i 8136	Define the complex number _i (the imaginary unit). (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- _i = <. 0R , 1R >.
Definition	df-r 8137	Define the set of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- RR = ( R. X. { 0R } )
Definition	df-add 8138*	Define addition over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- + = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. CC /\ y e. CC ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = <. ( w +R u ) , ( v +R f ) >. ) ) }
Definition	df-mul 8139*	Define multiplication over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|- x. = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. CC /\ y e. CC ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = <. ( ( w .R u ) +R ( -1R .R ( v .R f ) ) ) , ( ( v .R u ) +R ( w .R f ) ) >. ) ) }
Definition	df-lt 8140*	Define 'less than' on the real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- <RR = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. RR /\ y e. RR ) /\ E. z E. w ( ( x = <. z , 0R >. /\ y = <. w , 0R >. ) /\ z <R w ) ) }
Theorem	opelcn 8141	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.)
|- ( <. A , B >. e. CC <-> ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) )
Theorem	opelreal 8142	Ordered pair membership in class of real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( <. A , 0R >. e. RR <-> A e. R. )
Theorem	elreal 8143*	Membership in class of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
|- ( A e. RR <-> E. x e. R. <. x , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	elrealeu 8144*	The real number mapping in elreal 8143 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( A e. RR <-> E! x e. R. <. x , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	elreal2 8145	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
|- ( A e. RR <-> ( ( 1st ` A ) e. R. /\ A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , 0R >. ) )
Theorem	0ncn 8146	The empty set is not a complex number. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. See also cnm 8147 which is a related property. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.)
|- -. (/) e. CC
Theorem	cnm 8147*	A complex number is an inhabited set. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x x e. A )
Theorem	ltrelre 8148	'Less than' is a relation on real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- <RR C_ ( RR X. RR )
Theorem	addcnsr 8149	Addition of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. + <. C , D >. ) = <. ( A +R C ) , ( B +R D ) >. )
Theorem	mulcnsr 8150	Multiplication of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. x. <. C , D >. ) = <. ( ( A .R C ) +R ( -1R .R ( B .R D ) ) ) , ( ( B .R C ) +R ( A .R D ) ) >. )
Theorem	eqresr 8151	Equality of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , 0R >. = <. B , 0R >. <-> A = B )
Theorem	addresr 8152	Addition of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) -> ( <. A , 0R >. + <. B , 0R >. ) = <. ( A +R B ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	mulresr 8153	Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) -> ( <. A , 0R >. x. <. B , 0R >. ) = <. ( A .R B ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	ltresr 8154	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( <. A , 0R >. <RR <. B , 0R >. <-> A <R B )
Theorem	ltresr2 8155	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B <-> ( 1st ` A ) <R ( 1st ` B ) ) )
Theorem	dfcnqs 8156	Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in CC from those in R.. The trick involves qsid 6834, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that CC is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 8133), and allows us to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- CC = ( ( R. X. R. ) /. `' _E )
Theorem	addcnsrec 8157	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 8156 and mulcnsrec 8158. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E + [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( A +R C ) , ( B +R D ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	mulcnsrec 8158	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecidg 6833, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 8156. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E x. [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( ( A .R C ) +R ( -1R .R ( B .R D ) ) ) , ( ( B .R C ) +R ( A .R D ) ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	addvalex 8159	Existence of a sum. This is dependent on how we define + so once we proceed to real number axioms we will replace it with theorems such as addcl 8252. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A + B ) e. _V )
Theorem	pitonnlem1 8160*	Lemma for pitonn 8163. Two ways to write the number one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = 1
Theorem	pitonnlem1p1 8161	Lemma for pitonn 8163. Simplifying an expression involving signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2020.)
|- ( A e. P. -> [ <. ( A +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) , ( 1P +P. 1P ) >. ] ~R = [ <. ( A +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R )
Theorem	pitonnlem2 8162*	Lemma for pitonn 8163. Two ways to add one to a number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- ( K e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. + 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitonn 8163*	Mapping from N. to NN. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } )
Theorem	pitoregt0 8164*	Embedding from N. to RR yields a number greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> 0 <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitore 8165*	Embedding from N. to RR. Similar to pitonn 8163 but separate in the sense that we have not proved nnssre 9241 yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	recnnre 8166*	Embedding the reciprocal of a natural number into RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	peano1nnnn 8167*	One is an element of NN. This is a counterpart to 1nn 9248 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8215). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- 1 e. N
Theorem	peano2nnnn 8168*	A successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. This is a counterpart to peano2nn 9249 designed for real number axioms which involve to natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8215). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ( A + 1 ) e. N )
Theorem	ltrennb 8169*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( J e. N. /\ K e. N. ) -> ( J <N K <-> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) )
Theorem	ltrenn 8170*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2021.)
|- ( J <N K -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	recidpipr 8171*	Another way of saying that a number times its reciprocal is one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. .P. <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. ) = 1P )
Theorem	recidpirqlemcalc 8172	Lemma for recidpirq 8173. Rearranging some of the expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A .P. B ) = 1P )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) +P. ( 1P .P. 1P ) ) +P. 1P ) = ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. 1P ) +P. ( 1P .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) ) +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) )
Theorem	recidpirq 8173*	A real number times its reciprocal is one, where reciprocal is expressed with *Q. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = 1 )
4.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axcnex 8174	The complex numbers form a set. Use cnex 8251 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	axresscn 8175	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 8219. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- RR C_ CC
Theorem	ax1cn 8176	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 8220. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. CC
Theorem	ax1re 8177	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1re 8221. In the Metamath Proof Explorer, this is not a complex number axiom but is proved from ax-1cn 8220 and the other axioms. It is not known whether we can do so here, but the Metamath Proof Explorer proof (accessed 13-Jan-2020) uses excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Theorem	axicn 8178	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 8222. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- _i e. CC
Theorem	axaddcl 8179	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 8223 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 8252. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axaddrcl 8180	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 8224 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 8253. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axmulcl 8181	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 8225 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 8254. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axmulrcl 8182	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 8226 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 8255. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axaddf 8183	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 8179. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 8249. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axmulf 8184	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This is the construction-dependent version of ax-mulf 8250 and it should not be referenced outside the construction. We generally prefer to develop our theory using the less specific mulcl 8254. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axaddcom 8185	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcom 8227 be used later. Instead, use addcom 8410. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on real number trichotomy and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	axmulcom 8186	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 8228 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 8256. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	axaddass 8187	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 8229 be used later. Instead, use addass 8257. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	axmulass 8188	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 8230. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axdistr 8189	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 8231 be used later. Instead, use adddi 8259. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axi2m1 8190	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 8232. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Theorem	ax0lt1 8191	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0lt1 8233. The version of this axiom in the Metamath Proof Explorer reads 1 =/= 0; here we change it to 0 <RR 1. The proof of 0 <RR 1 from 1 =/= 0 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (accessed 12-Jan-2020) relies on real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Theorem	ax1rid 8192	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 8234. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	ax0id 8193	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0id 8235. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on excluded middle and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	axrnegex 8194*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 8236. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Theorem	axprecex 8195*	Existence of positive reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-precex 8237. In treatments which assume excluded middle, the 0 <RR A condition is generally replaced by A =/= 0, and it may not be necessary to state that the reciproacal is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	axcnre 8196*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 8238. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 8197	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 8239. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 8198	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 8240. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 8199	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 8241. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Theorem	axpre-apti 8200	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 8242. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )