P. 82 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8101-8200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mulresr 8101	Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) -> ( <. A , 0R >. x. <. B , 0R >. ) = <. ( A .R B ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	ltresr 8102	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( <. A , 0R >. <RR <. B , 0R >. <-> A <R B )
Theorem	ltresr2 8103	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B <-> ( 1st ` A ) <R ( 1st ` B ) ) )
Theorem	dfcnqs 8104	Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in CC from those in R.. The trick involves qsid 6812, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that CC is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 8081), and allows us to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- CC = ( ( R. X. R. ) /. `' _E )
Theorem	addcnsrec 8105	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 8104 and mulcnsrec 8106. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E + [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( A +R C ) , ( B +R D ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	mulcnsrec 8106	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecidg 6811, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 8104. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E x. [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( ( A .R C ) +R ( -1R .R ( B .R D ) ) ) , ( ( B .R C ) +R ( A .R D ) ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	addvalex 8107	Existence of a sum. This is dependent on how we define + so once we proceed to real number axioms we will replace it with theorems such as addcl 8200. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A + B ) e. _V )
Theorem	pitonnlem1 8108*	Lemma for pitonn 8111. Two ways to write the number one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = 1
Theorem	pitonnlem1p1 8109	Lemma for pitonn 8111. Simplifying an expression involving signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2020.)
|- ( A e. P. -> [ <. ( A +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) , ( 1P +P. 1P ) >. ] ~R = [ <. ( A +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R )
Theorem	pitonnlem2 8110*	Lemma for pitonn 8111. Two ways to add one to a number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- ( K e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. + 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitonn 8111*	Mapping from N. to NN. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } )
Theorem	pitoregt0 8112*	Embedding from N. to RR yields a number greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> 0 <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitore 8113*	Embedding from N. to RR. Similar to pitonn 8111 but separate in the sense that we have not proved nnssre 9189 yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	recnnre 8114*	Embedding the reciprocal of a natural number into RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	peano1nnnn 8115*	One is an element of NN. This is a counterpart to 1nn 9196 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8163). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- 1 e. N
Theorem	peano2nnnn 8116*	A successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. This is a counterpart to peano2nn 9197 designed for real number axioms which involve to natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8163). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ( A + 1 ) e. N )
Theorem	ltrennb 8117*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( J e. N. /\ K e. N. ) -> ( J <N K <-> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) )
Theorem	ltrenn 8118*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2021.)
|- ( J <N K -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	recidpipr 8119*	Another way of saying that a number times its reciprocal is one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. .P. <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. ) = 1P )
Theorem	recidpirqlemcalc 8120	Lemma for recidpirq 8121. Rearranging some of the expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A .P. B ) = 1P )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) +P. ( 1P .P. 1P ) ) +P. 1P ) = ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. 1P ) +P. ( 1P .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) ) +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) )
Theorem	recidpirq 8121*	A real number times its reciprocal is one, where reciprocal is expressed with *Q. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = 1 )
4.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axcnex 8122	The complex numbers form a set. Use cnex 8199 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	axresscn 8123	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 8167. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- RR C_ CC
Theorem	ax1cn 8124	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 8168. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. CC
Theorem	ax1re 8125	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1re 8169. In the Metamath Proof Explorer, this is not a complex number axiom but is proved from ax-1cn 8168 and the other axioms. It is not known whether we can do so here, but the Metamath Proof Explorer proof (accessed 13-Jan-2020) uses excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Theorem	axicn 8126	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 8170. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- _i e. CC
Theorem	axaddcl 8127	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 8171 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 8200. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axaddrcl 8128	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 8172 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 8201. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axmulcl 8129	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 8173 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 8202. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axmulrcl 8130	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 8174 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 8203. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axaddf 8131	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 8127. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 8197. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axmulf 8132	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This is the construction-dependent version of ax-mulf 8198 and it should not be referenced outside the construction. We generally prefer to develop our theory using the less specific mulcl 8202. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axaddcom 8133	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcom 8175 be used later. Instead, use addcom 8358. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on real number trichotomy and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	axmulcom 8134	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 8176 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 8204. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	axaddass 8135	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 8177 be used later. Instead, use addass 8205. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	axmulass 8136	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 8178. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axdistr 8137	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 8179 be used later. Instead, use adddi 8207. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axi2m1 8138	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 8180. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Theorem	ax0lt1 8139	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0lt1 8181. The version of this axiom in the Metamath Proof Explorer reads 1 =/= 0; here we change it to 0 <RR 1. The proof of 0 <RR 1 from 1 =/= 0 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (accessed 12-Jan-2020) relies on real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Theorem	ax1rid 8140	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 8182. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	ax0id 8141	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0id 8183. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on excluded middle and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	axrnegex 8142*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 8184. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Theorem	axprecex 8143*	Existence of positive reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-precex 8185. In treatments which assume excluded middle, the 0 <RR A condition is generally replaced by A =/= 0, and it may not be necessary to state that the reciproacal is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	axcnre 8144*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 8186. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 8145	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 8187. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 8146	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 8188. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 8147	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 8189. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Theorem	axpre-apti 8148	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 8190. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 8149	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 8191. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 8150	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 8192. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulext 8151	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulext 8193. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Theorem	rereceu 8152*	The reciprocal from axprecex 8143 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E! x e. RR ( A x. x ) = 1 )
Theorem	recriota 8153*	Two ways to express the reciprocal of a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( iota_ r e. RR ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. r ) = 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	axarch 8154*	Archimedean axiom. The Archimedean property is more naturally stated once we have defined NN. Unless we find another way to state it, we'll just use the right hand side of dfnn2 9187 in stating what we mean by "natural number" in the context of this axiom. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-arch 8194. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Theorem	peano5nnnn 8155*	Peano's inductive postulate. This is a counterpart to peano5nni 9188 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8163). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( ( 1 e. A /\ A. z e. A ( z + 1 ) e. A ) -> N C_ A )
Theorem	nnindnn 8156*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). This is a counterpart to nnind 9201 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8163). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( z = 1 -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( z = k -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( k + 1 ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( k e. N -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ta )
Theorem	nntopi 8157*	Mapping from NN to N.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> E. z e. N. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcl 8158*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8163. Mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) e. R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemf 8159*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8163. Mapping to N. and R. yields a sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G : N. --> R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemval 8160*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8163. Value of sequence when mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. ( G ` J ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcau 8161*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8163. The result of mapping to N. and R. satisfies the Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( G ` n ) <R ( ( G ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( G ` k ) <R ( ( G ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvglemres 8162*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8163. Mapping the limit from N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvg 8163*	Real number completeness axiom. A Cauchy sequence with a modulus of convergence converges. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). Because we are stating this axiom before we have introduced notations for NN or division, we use N for the natural numbers and express a reciprocal in terms of iota_. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-caucvg 8195. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploclemres 8164*	Lemma for axpre-suploc 8165. The result. The proof just needs to define B as basically the same set as A (but expressed as a subset of R. rather than a subset of RR), and apply suplocsr 8072. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) )   &    |- B = { w e. R. | <. w , 0R >. e. A }   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploc 8165*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-suploc 8196. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
4.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 8166	The complex numbers form a set. Proofs should normally use cnex 8199 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- CC e. _V
Axiom	ax-resscn 8167	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 8123. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- RR C_ CC
Axiom	ax-1cn 8168	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 8124. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- 1 e. CC
Axiom	ax-1re 8169	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1re 8125. Proofs should use 1re 8221 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Axiom	ax-icn 8170	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 8126. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- _i e. CC
Axiom	ax-addcl 8171	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 8127. Proofs should normally use addcl 8200 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-addrcl 8172	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 8128. Proofs should normally use readdcl 8201 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-mulcl 8173	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 8129. Proofs should normally use mulcl 8202 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 8174	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 8130. Proofs should normally use remulcl 8203 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-addcom 8175	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcom 8133. Proofs should normally use addcom 8358 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Axiom	ax-mulcom 8176	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 8134. Proofs should normally use mulcom 8204 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Axiom	ax-addass 8177	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 8135. Proofs should normally use addass 8205 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-mulass 8178	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 8136. Proofs should normally use mulass 8206 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-distr 8179	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 8137. Proofs should normally use adddi 8207 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-i2m1 8180	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 8138. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Axiom	ax-0lt1 8181	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0lt1 8139. Proofs should normally use 0lt1 8348 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Axiom	ax-1rid 8182	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 8140. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-0id 8183	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0id 8141. Proofs should normally use addrid 8359 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-rnegex 8184*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 8142. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Axiom	ax-precex 8185*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axprecex 8143. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Axiom	ax-cnre 8186*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 8144. For naming consistency, use cnre 8218 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltirr 8187	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax-pre-ltirr 8187. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltwlin 8188	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltwlin 8146. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 8189	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 8147. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-apti 8190	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-apti 8148. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 8191	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 8149. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 8192	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 8150. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulext 8193	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulext 8151 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Axiom	ax-arch 8194*	Archimedean axiom. Definition 3.1(2) of [Geuvers], p. 9. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axarch 8154. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use arch 9441 (which is the same, but stated in terms of NN and <). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Axiom	ax-caucvg 8195*	Completeness. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcaucvg 8163. A Cauchy sequence (as defined here, which has a rate convergence built in) of real numbers converges to a real number. Specifically on rate of convergence, all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use caucvgre 11604 (which is the same, but stated in terms of the NN and 1 / n notations). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-suploc 8196*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. Although this and ax-caucvg 8195 are both completeness properties, countable choice would probably be needed to derive this from ax-caucvg 8195. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Axiom	ax-addf 8197	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 8200 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 8197 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x + y ) ) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 8131. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Axiom	ax-mulf 8198	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This axiom tells us that x. is defined only on complex numbers which is analogous to the way that other operations are defined, for example see subf 8423 or eff 12287. However, while Metamath can handle this axiom, if we wish to work with weaker complex number axioms, we can avoid it by using the less specific mulcl 8202. Note that uses of ax-mulf 8198 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x x. y ) ) in place of x., as seen in mpomulf 8212. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 8132. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
4.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
4.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 8199	Alias for ax-cnex 8166. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	addcl 8200	Alias for ax-addcl 8171, for naming consistency with addcli 8226. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 8171 or axaddcl 8127. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )