P. 82 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8101-8200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lttri3d 8101	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A = B <-> ( -. A < B /\ -. B < A ) ) )
Theorem	letri3d 8102	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A = B <-> ( A <_ B /\ B <_ A ) ) )
Theorem	eqleltd 8103	Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A = B <-> ( A <_ B /\ -. A < B ) ) )
Theorem	lenltd 8104	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A <_ B <-> -. B < A ) )
Theorem	ltled 8105	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )
Theorem	ltnsymd 8106	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. B < A )
Theorem	nltled 8107	'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> -. B < A )   =>    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )
Theorem	lensymd 8108	'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. B < A )
Theorem	mulgt0d 8109	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < B )   =>    |- ( ph -> 0 < ( A x. B ) )
Theorem	letrd 8110	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> B <_ C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A <_ C )
Theorem	lelttrd 8111	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> B < C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A < C )
Theorem	lttrd 8112	Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < B )   &    |- ( ph -> B < C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A < C )
Theorem	0lt1 8113	0 is less than 1. Theorem I.21 of [Apostol] p. 20. Part of definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|- 0 < 1
Theorem	ltntri 8114	Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we cannot prove real number trichotomy, A < B \/ A = B \/ B < A. Does that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no, as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> -. ( -. A < B /\ -. A = B /\ -. B < A ) )
4.2.5  Initial properties of the complex numbers
Theorem	mul12 8115	Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) = ( B x. ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	mul32 8116	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. B ) )
Theorem	mul31 8117	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( C x. B ) x. A ) )
Theorem	mul4 8118	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) /\ ( C e. CC /\ D e. CC ) ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. ( C x. D ) ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. ( B x. D ) ) )
Theorem	muladd11 8119	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( ( 1 + A ) x. ( 1 + B ) ) = ( ( 1 + A ) + ( B + ( A x. B ) ) ) )
Theorem	1p1times 8120	Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( ( 1 + 1 ) x. A ) = ( A + A ) )
Theorem	peano2cn 8121	A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4612. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 1 ) e. CC )
Theorem	peano2re 8122	A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4612. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A + 1 ) e. RR )
Theorem	addcom 8123	Addition commutes. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	addrid 8124	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	addlid 8125	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( 0 + A ) = A )
Theorem	readdcan 8126	Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( C + A ) = ( C + B ) <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	00id 8127	0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( 0 + 0 ) = 0
Theorem	addid1i 8128	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( A + 0 ) = A
Theorem	addid2i 8129	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( 0 + A ) = A
Theorem	addcomi 8130	Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A + B ) = ( B + A )
Theorem	addcomli 8131	Addition commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- ( A + B ) = C   =>    |- ( B + A ) = C
Theorem	mul12i 8132	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) = ( B x. ( A x. C ) )
Theorem	mul32i 8133	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. B )
Theorem	mul4i 8134	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   &    |- D e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A x. B ) x. ( C x. D ) ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. ( B x. D ) )
Theorem	addridd 8135	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	addlidd 8136	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( 0 + A ) = A )
Theorem	addcomd 8137	Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	mul12d 8138	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) = ( B x. ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	mul32d 8139	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. B ) )
Theorem	mul31d 8140	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( C x. B ) x. A ) )
Theorem	mul4d 8141	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) x. ( C x. D ) ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. ( B x. D ) ) )
Theorem	muladd11r 8142	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( ( A + 1 ) x. ( B + 1 ) ) = ( ( ( A x. B ) + ( A + B ) ) + 1 ) )
Theorem	comraddd 8143	Commute RHS addition, in deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.)
|- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> A = ( B + C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = ( C + B ) )
4.3  Real and complex numbers - basic operations
4.3.1  Addition
Theorem	add12 8144	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A + ( B + C ) ) = ( B + ( A + C ) ) )
Theorem	add32 8145	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( ( A + C ) + B ) )
Theorem	add32r 8146	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum, rearranging the parentheses. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A + ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + B ) )
Theorem	add4 8147	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
|- ( ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) /\ ( C e. CC /\ D e. CC ) ) -> ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( B + D ) ) )
Theorem	add42 8148	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2005.)
|- ( ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) /\ ( C e. CC /\ D e. CC ) ) -> ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( D + B ) ) )
Theorem	add12i 8149	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( A + ( B + C ) ) = ( B + ( A + C ) )
Theorem	add32i 8150	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( ( A + C ) + B )
Theorem	add4i 8151	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   &    |- D e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( B + D ) )
Theorem	add42i 8152	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   &    |- D e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( D + B ) )
Theorem	add12d 8153	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + ( B + C ) ) = ( B + ( A + C ) ) )
Theorem	add32d 8154	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( ( A + C ) + B ) )
Theorem	add4d 8155	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( B + D ) ) )
Theorem	add42d 8156	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( D + B ) ) )
4.3.2  Subtraction
Syntax	cmin 8157	Extend class notation to include subtraction.
class -
Syntax	cneg 8158	Extend class notation to include unary minus. The symbol -u is not a class by itself but part of a compound class definition. We do this rather than making it a formal function since it is so commonly used. Note: We use different symbols for unary minus ( -u) and subtraction cmin 8157 ( -) to prevent syntax ambiguity. For example, looking at the syntax definition co 5895, if we used the same symbol then " ( - A - B ) " could mean either " - A " minus " B", or it could represent the (meaningless) operation of classes " - " and " - B " connected with "operation" " A". On the other hand, " ( -u A - B ) " is unambiguous.
class -u A
Definition	df-sub 8159*	Define subtraction. Theorem subval 8178 shows its value (and describes how this definition works), Theorem subaddi 8273 relates it to addition, and Theorems subcli 8262 and resubcli 8249 prove its closure laws. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1994.)
|- - = ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( iota_ z e. CC ( y + z ) = x ) )
Definition	df-neg 8160	Define the negative of a number (unary minus). We use different symbols for unary minus ( -u) and subtraction ( -) to prevent syntax ambiguity. See cneg 8158 for a discussion of this. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
|- -u A = ( 0 - A )
Theorem	cnegexlem1 8161	Addition cancellation of a real number from two complex numbers. Lemma for cnegex 8164. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) = ( A + C ) <-> B = C ) )
Theorem	cnegexlem2 8162	Existence of a real number which produces a real number when multiplied by _i. (Hint: zero is such a number, although we don't need to prove that yet). Lemma for cnegex 8164. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
|- E. y e. RR ( _i x. y ) e. RR
Theorem	cnegexlem3 8163*	Existence of real number difference. Lemma for cnegex 8164. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-May-2007.)
|- ( ( b e. RR /\ y e. RR ) -> E. c e. RR ( b + c ) = y )
Theorem	cnegex 8164*	Existence of the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. CC ( A + x ) = 0 )
Theorem	cnegex2 8165*	Existence of a left inverse for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. CC ( x + A ) = 0 )
Theorem	addcan 8166	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) = ( A + C ) <-> B = C ) )
Theorem	addcan2 8167	Cancellation law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + C ) = ( B + C ) <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	addcani 8168	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) = ( A + C ) <-> B = C )
Theorem	addcan2i 8169	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2003.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + C ) = ( B + C ) <-> A = B )
Theorem	addcand 8170	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) = ( A + C ) <-> B = C ) )
Theorem	addcan2d 8171	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + C ) = ( B + C ) <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	addcanad 8172	Cancelling a term on the left-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcand 8170. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A + B ) = ( A + C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> B = C )
Theorem	addcan2ad 8173	Cancelling a term on the right-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcan2d 8171. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A + C ) = ( B + C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = B )
Theorem	addneintrd 8174	Introducing a term on the left-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcanad 8172. Consequence of addcand 8170. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B =/= C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + B ) =/= ( A + C ) )
Theorem	addneintr2d 8175	Introducing a term on the right-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcan2ad 8173. Consequence of addcan2d 8171. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + C ) =/= ( B + C ) )
Theorem	0cnALT 8176	Alternate proof of 0cn 7978. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 0 e. CC
Theorem	negeu 8177*	Existential uniqueness of negatives. Theorem I.2 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> E! x e. CC ( A + x ) = B )
Theorem	subval 8178*	Value of subtraction, which is the (unique) element x such that B + x = A. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A - B ) = ( iota_ x e. CC ( B + x ) = A ) )
Theorem	negeq 8179	Equality theorem for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> -u A = -u B )
Theorem	negeqi 8180	Equality inference for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|- A = B   =>    |- -u A = -u B
Theorem	negeqd 8181	Equality deduction for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -u A = -u B )
Theorem	nfnegd 8182	Deduction version of nfneg 8183. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x -u A )
Theorem	nfneg 8183	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x -u A
Theorem	csbnegg 8184	Move class substitution in and out of the negative of a number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> [_ A / x ]_ -u B = -u [_ A / x ]_ B )
Theorem	subcl 8185	Closure law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A - B ) e. CC )
Theorem	negcl 8186	Closure law for negative. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2003.)
|- ( A e. CC -> -u A e. CC )
Theorem	negicn 8187	-u _i is a complex number (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Dec-2018.)
|- -u _i e. CC
Theorem	subf 8188	Subtraction is an operation on the complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.)
|- - : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	subadd 8189	Relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A - B ) = C <-> ( B + C ) = A ) )
Theorem	subadd2 8190	Relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Jul-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A - B ) = C <-> ( C + B ) = A ) )
Theorem	subsub23 8191	Swap subtrahend and result of subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A - B ) = C <-> ( A - C ) = B ) )
Theorem	pncan 8192	Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) - B ) = A )
Theorem	pncan2 8193	Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) - A ) = B )
Theorem	pncan3 8194	Subtraction and addition of equals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + ( B - A ) ) = B )
Theorem	npcan 8195	Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( ( A - B ) + B ) = A )
Theorem	addsubass 8196	Associative-type law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) - C ) = ( A + ( B - C ) ) )
Theorem	addsub 8197	Law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2001.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) - C ) = ( ( A - C ) + B ) )
Theorem	subadd23 8198	Commutative/associative law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A - B ) + C ) = ( A + ( C - B ) ) )
Theorem	addsub12 8199	Commutative/associative law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A + ( B - C ) ) = ( B + ( A - C ) ) )
Theorem	2addsub 8200	Law for subtraction and addition. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.)
|- ( ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) /\ ( C e. CC /\ D e. CC ) ) -> ( ( ( A + B ) + C ) - D ) = ( ( ( A + C ) - D ) + B ) )