P. 82 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8101-8200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 8101	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 8143. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 8102	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 8144. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 8103	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 8145. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Theorem	axpre-apti 8104	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 8146. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 8105	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 8147. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 8106	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 8148. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulext 8107	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulext 8149. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Theorem	rereceu 8108*	The reciprocal from axprecex 8099 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E! x e. RR ( A x. x ) = 1 )
Theorem	recriota 8109*	Two ways to express the reciprocal of a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( iota_ r e. RR ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. r ) = 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	axarch 8110*	Archimedean axiom. The Archimedean property is more naturally stated once we have defined NN. Unless we find another way to state it, we'll just use the right hand side of dfnn2 9144 in stating what we mean by "natural number" in the context of this axiom. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-arch 8150. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Theorem	peano5nnnn 8111*	Peano's inductive postulate. This is a counterpart to peano5nni 9145 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8119). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( ( 1 e. A /\ A. z e. A ( z + 1 ) e. A ) -> N C_ A )
Theorem	nnindnn 8112*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). This is a counterpart to nnind 9158 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 8119). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( z = 1 -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( z = k -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( k + 1 ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( k e. N -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ta )
Theorem	nntopi 8113*	Mapping from NN to N.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> E. z e. N. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcl 8114*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8119. Mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) e. R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemf 8115*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8119. Mapping to N. and R. yields a sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G : N. --> R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemval 8116*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8119. Value of sequence when mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. ( G ` J ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcau 8117*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8119. The result of mapping to N. and R. satisfies the Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( G ` n ) <R ( ( G ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( G ` k ) <R ( ( G ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvglemres 8118*	Lemma for axcaucvg 8119. Mapping the limit from N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvg 8119*	Real number completeness axiom. A Cauchy sequence with a modulus of convergence converges. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). Because we are stating this axiom before we have introduced notations for NN or division, we use N for the natural numbers and express a reciprocal in terms of iota_. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-caucvg 8151. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploclemres 8120*	Lemma for axpre-suploc 8121. The result. The proof just needs to define B as basically the same set as A (but expressed as a subset of R. rather than a subset of RR), and apply suplocsr 8028. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) )   &    |- B = { w e. R. | <. w , 0R >. e. A }   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-suploc 8121*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-suploc 8152. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
4.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 8122	The complex numbers form a set. Proofs should normally use cnex 8155 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- CC e. _V
Axiom	ax-resscn 8123	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 8079. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- RR C_ CC
Axiom	ax-1cn 8124	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 8080. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- 1 e. CC
Axiom	ax-1re 8125	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1re 8081. Proofs should use 1re 8177 instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Axiom	ax-icn 8126	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 8082. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- _i e. CC
Axiom	ax-addcl 8127	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 8083. Proofs should normally use addcl 8156 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-addrcl 8128	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 8084. Proofs should normally use readdcl 8157 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-mulcl 8129	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 8085. Proofs should normally use mulcl 8158 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 8130	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 8086. Proofs should normally use remulcl 8159 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Axiom	ax-addcom 8131	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcom 8089. Proofs should normally use addcom 8315 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Axiom	ax-mulcom 8132	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 8090. Proofs should normally use mulcom 8160 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Axiom	ax-addass 8133	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 8091. Proofs should normally use addass 8161 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-mulass 8134	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 8092. Proofs should normally use mulass 8162 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-distr 8135	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 8093. Proofs should normally use adddi 8163 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Axiom	ax-i2m1 8136	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 8094. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Axiom	ax-0lt1 8137	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0lt1 8095. Proofs should normally use 0lt1 8305 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Axiom	ax-1rid 8138	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 8096. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-0id 8139	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax0id 8097. Proofs should normally use addrid 8316 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Axiom	ax-rnegex 8140*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 8098. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Axiom	ax-precex 8141*	Existence of reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axprecex 8099. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Axiom	ax-cnre 8142*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 8100. For naming consistency, use cnre 8174 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltirr 8143	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax-pre-ltirr 8143. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltwlin 8144	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltwlin 8102. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 8145	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 8103. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-apti 8146	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-apti 8104. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 8147	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 8105. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 8148	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 8106. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulext 8149	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulext 8107 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Axiom	ax-arch 8150*	Archimedean axiom. Definition 3.1(2) of [Geuvers], p. 9. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axarch 8110. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use arch 9398 (which is the same, but stated in terms of NN and <). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Axiom	ax-caucvg 8151*	Completeness. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcaucvg 8119. A Cauchy sequence (as defined here, which has a rate convergence built in) of real numbers converges to a real number. Specifically on rate of convergence, all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use caucvgre 11541 (which is the same, but stated in terms of the NN and 1 / n notations). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-suploc 8152*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. Although this and ax-caucvg 8151 are both completeness properties, countable choice would probably be needed to derive this from ax-caucvg 8151. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Axiom	ax-addf 8153	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 8156 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 8153 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x + y ) ) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 8087. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Axiom	ax-mulf 8154	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This axiom tells us that x. is defined only on complex numbers which is analogous to the way that other operations are defined, for example see subf 8380 or eff 12223. However, while Metamath can handle this axiom, if we wish to work with weaker complex number axioms, we can avoid it by using the less specific mulcl 8158. Note that uses of ax-mulf 8154 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x x. y ) ) in place of x., as seen in mpomulf 8168. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 8088. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
4.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
4.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 8155	Alias for ax-cnex 8122. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	addcl 8156	Alias for ax-addcl 8127, for naming consistency with addcli 8182. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 8127 or axaddcl 8083. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	readdcl 8157	Alias for ax-addrcl 8128, for naming consistency with readdcli 8191. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	mulcl 8158	Alias for ax-mulcl 8129, for naming consistency with mulcli 8183. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	remulcl 8159	Alias for ax-mulrcl 8130, for naming consistency with remulcli 8192. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Theorem	mulcom 8160	Alias for ax-mulcom 8132, for naming consistency with mulcomi 8184. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	addass 8161	Alias for ax-addass 8133, for naming consistency with addassi 8186. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	mulass 8162	Alias for ax-mulass 8134, for naming consistency with mulassi 8187. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddi 8163	Alias for ax-distr 8135, for naming consistency with adddii 8188. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	recn 8164	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A e. CC )
Theorem	reex 8165	The real numbers form a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
|- RR e. _V
Theorem	reelprrecn 8166	Reals are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- RR e. { RR , CC }
Theorem	cnelprrecn 8167	Complex numbers are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- CC e. { RR , CC }
Theorem	mpomulf 8168*	Multiplication is an operation on complex numbers. Version of ax-mulf 8154 using maps-to notation, proved from the axioms of set theory and ax-mulcl 8129. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
|- ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x x. y ) ) : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	adddir 8169	Distributive law for complex numbers (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) + ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	0cn 8170	0 is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.)
|- 0 e. CC
Theorem	0cnd 8171	0 is a complex number, deductive form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 0 e. CC )
Theorem	c0ex 8172	0 is a set (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
|- 0 e. _V
Theorem	1ex 8173	1 is a set. Common special case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
|- 1 e. _V
Theorem	cnre 8174*	Alias for ax-cnre 8142, for naming consistency. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	mulrid 8175	1 is an identity element for multiplication. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	mullid 8176	Identity law for multiplication. Note: see mulrid 8175 for commuted version. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( 1 x. A ) = A )
Theorem	1re 8177	1 is a real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.)
|- 1 e. RR
Theorem	0re 8178	0 is a real number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- 0 e. RR
Theorem	0red 8179	0 is a real number, deductive form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 0 e. RR )
Theorem	mulridi 8180	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. 1 ) = A
Theorem	mullidi 8181	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( 1 x. A ) = A
Theorem	addcli 8182	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A + B ) e. CC
Theorem	mulcli 8183	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. B ) e. CC
Theorem	mulcomi 8184	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A )
Theorem	mulcomli 8185	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- ( A x. B ) = C   =>    |- ( B x. A ) = C
Theorem	addassi 8186	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) )
Theorem	mulassi 8187	Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) )
Theorem	adddii 8188	Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) )
Theorem	adddiri 8189	Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) + ( B x. C ) )
Theorem	recni 8190	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- A e. RR   =>    |- A e. CC
Theorem	readdcli 8191	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A + B ) e. RR
Theorem	remulcli 8192	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A x. B ) e. RR
Theorem	1red 8193	1 is an real number, deductive form (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 1 e. RR )
Theorem	1cnd 8194	1 is a complex number, deductive form (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 1 e. CC )
Theorem	mulridd 8195	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	mullidd 8196	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( 1 x. A ) = A )
Theorem	mulid2d 8197	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( 1 x. A ) = A )
Theorem	addcld 8198	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	mulcld 8199	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	mulcomd 8200	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )