| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 133 of 171) | < Previous Next > | |
| Browser slow? Try the
Unicode version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | ballotfilem1c 13201* | If the first vote is for A, the vote on the first tie is for B. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Apr-2017.) |
| Theorem | ballotfilemsval 13202* |
Value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemsv 13203* |
Value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemsgt1 13204* |
|
| Theorem | ballotfilemsdom 13205* |
Domain of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemsel1i 13206* |
The range |
| Theorem | ballotfilemsf1o 13207* |
The defined |
| Theorem | ballotfilemsi 13208* |
The image by |
| Theorem | ballotfilemsima 13209* |
The image by |
| Theorem | ballotfilemieq 13210* | If two countings share the same first tie, they also have the same swap function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Apr-2017.) |
| Theorem | ballotfilemrval 13211* |
Value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemscr 13212* |
The image of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemrv 13213* |
Value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemrv1 13214* |
Value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemrv2 13215* |
Value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemro 13216* |
Range of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemgval 13217* |
Expand the value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemgun 13218* |
A property of the defined |
| Theorem | ballotfilemfg 13219* |
Express the value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemfrc 13220* |
Express the value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemfrci 13221* | Reverse counting preserves a tie at the first tie. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Apr-2017.) |
| Theorem | ballotfilemfrceq 13222* |
Value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemfrcn0 13223* |
Value of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemrc 13224* |
Range of |
| Theorem | ballotfilemirc 13225* |
Applying |
| Theorem | ballotfilemrinv0 13226* | Lemma for ballotfilemrinv 13227. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Apr-2017.) |
| Theorem | ballotfilemrinv 13227* |
|
| Theorem | ballotfilem1ri 13228* | When the vote on the first tie is for A, the first vote is also for A on the reverse counting. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Apr-2017.) |
| Theorem | ballotfilem7 13229* |
|
| Theorem | ballotfilem8 13230* |
There are as many countings with ties starting with a ballot for |
| Theorem | ballotfilemth 13231* | Lemma for ballotfi 13232. The result, with several additional hypotheses which are for use during the proof. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2016.) |
| Theorem | ballotfi 13232* | Bertrand's ballot problem : the probability that A is ahead throughout the counting. The proof formalized here is a proof "by reflection", as opposed to other known proofs "by induction" or "by permutation". This is Metamath 100 proof #30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2026.) |
| Theorem | oddennn 13233 | There are as many odd positive integers as there are positive integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2022.) |
| Theorem | evenennn 13234 | There are as many even positive integers as there are positive integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2022.) |
| Theorem | xpnnen 13235 | The Cartesian product of the set of positive integers with itself is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.) |
| Theorem | xpomen 13236 | The Cartesian product of omega (the set of ordinal natural numbers) with itself is equinumerous to omega. Exercise 1 of [Enderton] p. 133. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.) |
| Theorem | xpct 13237 |
The cartesian product of two sets dominated by |
| Theorem | unennn 13238 | The union of two disjoint countably infinite sets is countably infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2022.) |
| Theorem | znnen 13239 | The set of integers and the set of positive integers are equinumerous. Corollary 8.1.23 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemdc 13240* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. A direct consequence of fidcenumlemrk 7239. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2023.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemk 13241* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2023.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemj0 13242* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Initial state for |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemjn 13243* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Non-initial state for |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemg 13244* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Closure for |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemh 13245* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2023.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelem0 13246* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Initial value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2023.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemp1 13247* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Value of |
| Theorem | ennnfonelem1 13248* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Second value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemom 13249* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemhdmp1 13250* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Domain at a successor where we need to add an element to the sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jul-2023.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemss 13251* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. We only add elements to |
| Theorem | ennnfoneleminc 13252* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. We only add elements to |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemkh 13253* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Because we add zero or one entries for each new index, the length of each sequence is no greater than its index. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2023.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemhf1o 13254* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Each of the functions in |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemex 13255* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. Extending the sequence |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemhom 13256* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. The sequences in |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemrnh 13257* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. A consequence of ennnfonelemss 13251. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemfun 13258* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemf1 13259* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemrn 13260* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemdm 13261* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. The function |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemen 13262* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jul-2023.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemnn0 13263* |
Lemma for ennnfone 13266. A version of ennnfonelemen 13262 expressed in
terms of |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemr 13264* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. The interesting direction, expressed in deduction form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.) |
| Theorem | ennnfonelemim 13265* | Lemma for ennnfone 13266. The trivial direction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Oct-2022.) |
| Theorem | ennnfone 13266* |
A condition for a set being countably infinite. Corollary 8.1.13 of
[AczelRathjen], p. 73. Roughly
speaking, the condition says that |
| Theorem | exmidunben 13267* |
If any unbounded set of positive integers is equinumerous to |
| Theorem | ctinfomlemom 13268* |
Lemma for ctinfom 13269. Converting between |
| Theorem | ctinfom 13269* |
A condition for a set being countably infinite. Restates ennnfone 13266 in
terms of |
| Theorem | inffinp1 13270* | An infinite set contains an element not contained in a given finite subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2023.) |
| Theorem | ctinf 13271* | A set is countably infinite if and only if it has decidable equality, is countable, and is infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2023.) |
| Theorem | qnnen 13272 | The rational numbers are countably infinite. Corollary 8.1.23 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. This is Metamath 100 proof #3. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2023.) |
| Theorem | enctlem 13273* | Lemma for enct 13274. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| Theorem | enct 13274* | Countability is invariant relative to equinumerosity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| Theorem | ctiunctlemu1st 13275* | Lemma for ctiunct 13281. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| Theorem | ctiunctlemu2nd 13276* | Lemma for ctiunct 13281. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| Theorem | ctiunctlemuom 13277 | Lemma for ctiunct 13281. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| Theorem | ctiunctlemudc 13278* | Lemma for ctiunct 13281. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| Theorem | ctiunctlemf 13279* | Lemma for ctiunct 13281. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| Theorem | ctiunctlemfo 13280* | Lemma for ctiunct 13281. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.) |
| Theorem | ctiunct 13281* |
A sequence of enumerations gives an enumeration of the union. We refer
to "sequence of enumerations" rather than "countably many
countable
sets" because the hypothesis provides more than countability for
each
For "countably many countable sets" the key hypothesis would
be
Compare with the case of two sets instead of countably many, as seen at unct 13283, which says that the union of two countable sets is countable .
The proof proceeds by mapping a natural number to a pair of natural
numbers (by xpomen 13236) and using the first number to map to an
element
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Oct-2023.) |
| Theorem | ctiunctal 13282* |
Variation of ctiunct 13281 which allows |
| Theorem | unct 13283* | The union of two countable sets is countable. Corollary 8.1.20 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Nov-2023.) |
| Theorem | omctfn 13284* | Using countable choice to find a sequence of enumerations for a collection of countable sets. Lemma 8.1.27 of [AczelRathjen], p. 77. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Apr-2024.) |
| Theorem | omiunct 13285* | The union of a countably infinite collection of countable sets is countable. Theorem 8.1.28 of [AczelRathjen], p. 78. Compare with ctiunct 13281 which has a stronger hypothesis but does not require countable choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2024.) |
| Theorem | ssomct 13286* |
A decidable subset of |
| Theorem | ssnnctlemct 13287* | Lemma for ssnnct 13288. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Sep-2024.) |
| Theorem | ssnnct 13288* |
A decidable subset of |
| Theorem | nninfdclemcl 13289* | Lemma for nninfdc 13294. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2024.) |
| Theorem | nninfdclemf 13290* |
Lemma for nninfdc 13294. A function from the natural numbers into
|
| Theorem | nninfdclemp1 13291* |
Lemma for nninfdc 13294. Each element of the sequence |
| Theorem | nninfdclemlt 13292* | Lemma for nninfdc 13294. The function from nninfdclemf 13290 is strictly monotonic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2024.) |
| Theorem | nninfdclemf1 13293* | Lemma for nninfdc 13294. The function from nninfdclemf 13290 is one-to-one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| Theorem | nninfdc 13294* | An unbounded decidable set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.) |
| Theorem | unbendc 13295* | An unbounded decidable set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| Theorem | prminf 13296 | There are an infinite number of primes. Theorem 1.7 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.) |
| Theorem | infpn2 13297* |
There exist infinitely many prime numbers: the set of all primes |
An "extensible structure" (or "structure" in short, at least in this section) is used to define a specific group, ring, poset, and so on. An extensible structure can contain many components. For example, a group will have at least two components (base set and operation), although it can be further specialized by adding other components such as a multiplicative operation for rings (and still remain a group per our definition). Thus, every ring is also a group. This extensible structure approach allows theorems from more general structures (such as groups) to be reused for more specialized structures (such as rings) without having to reprove anything. Structures are common in mathematics, but in informal (natural language) proofs the details are assumed in ways that we must make explicit.
An extensible structure is implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs)
on a finite (and not necessarily sequential) subset of
There are many other possible ways to handle structures. We chose this
extensible structure approach because this approach (1) results in simpler
notation than other approaches we are aware of, and (2) is easier to do
proofs with. We cannot use an approach that uses "hidden"
arguments;
Metamath does not support hidden arguments, and in any case we want nothing
hidden. It would be possible to use a categorical approach (e.g., something
vaguely similar to Lean's mathlib). However, instances (the chain of proofs
that an
To create a substructure of a given extensible structure, you can simply use
the multifunction restriction operator for extensible structures
↾s as
defined in df-iress 13310. This can be used to turn statements about
rings into
statements about subrings, modules into submodules, etc. This definition
knows nothing about individual structures and merely truncates the Extensible structures only work well when they represent concrete categories, where there is a "base set", morphisms are functions, and subobjects are subsets with induced operations. In short, they primarily work well for "sets with (some) extra structure". Extensible structures may not suffice for more complicated situations. For example, in manifolds, ↾s would not work. That said, extensible structures are sufficient for many of the structures that set.mm currently considers, and offer a good compromise for a goal-oriented formalization. | ||
| Syntax | cstr 13298 |
Extend class notation with the class of structures with components
numbered below |
| Syntax | cnx 13299 | Extend class notation with the structure component index extractor. |
| Syntax | csts 13300 | Set components of a structure. |
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |