P. 79 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7801-7900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	caucvgsrlemoffres 7801*	Lemma for caucvgsr 7803. Offsetting the values of the sequence so they are greater than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. A <R ( F ` m ) )   &    |- G = ( a e. N. |-> ( ( ( F ` a ) +R 1R ) +R ( A .R -1R ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. R. A. x e. R. ( 0R <R x -> E. j e. N. A. k e. N. ( j <N k -> ( ( F ` k ) <R ( y +R x ) /\ y <R ( ( F ` k ) +R x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	caucvgsrlembnd 7802*	Lemma for caucvgsr 7803. A Cauchy sequence with a lower bound converges. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. m e. N. A <R ( F ` m ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. R. A. x e. R. ( 0R <R x -> E. j e. N. A. k e. N. ( j <N k -> ( ( F ` k ) <R ( y +R x ) /\ y <R ( ( F ` k ) +R x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	caucvgsr 7803*	A Cauchy sequence of signed reals with a modulus of convergence converges to a signed real. This is basically Corollary 11.2.13 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The HoTT book theorem has a modulus of convergence (that is, a rate of convergence) specified by (11.2.9) in HoTT whereas this theorem fixes the rate of convergence to say that all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term (it should later be able to prove versions of this theorem with a different fixed rate or a modulus of convergence supplied as a hypothesis). This is similar to caucvgprpr 7713 but is for signed reals rather than positive reals. Here is an outline of how we prove it: 1. Choose a lower bound for the sequence (see caucvgsrlembnd 7802). 2. Offset each element of the sequence so that each element of the resulting sequence is greater than one (greater than zero would not suffice, because the limit as well as the elements of the sequence need to be positive) (see caucvgsrlemofff 7798). 3. Since a signed real (element of R.) which is greater than zero can be mapped to a positive real (element of P.), perform that mapping on each element of the sequence and invoke caucvgprpr 7713 to get a limit (see caucvgsrlemgt1 7796). 4. Map the resulting limit from positive reals back to signed reals (see caucvgsrlemgt1 7796). 5. Offset that limit so that we get the limit of the original sequence rather than the limit of the offsetted sequence (see caucvgsrlemoffres 7801). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : N. --> R. )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( F ` n ) <R ( ( F ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( F ` k ) <R ( ( F ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. R. A. x e. R. ( 0R <R x -> E. j e. N. A. k e. N. ( j <N k -> ( ( F ` k ) <R ( y +R x ) /\ y <R ( ( F ` k ) +R x ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	ltpsrprg 7804	Mapping of order from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. P. /\ B e. P. /\ C e. R. ) -> ( ( C +R [ <. A , 1P >. ] ~R ) <R ( C +R [ <. B , 1P >. ] ~R ) <-> A <P B ) )
Theorem	mappsrprg 7805	Mapping from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. P. /\ C e. R. ) -> ( C +R -1R ) <R ( C +R [ <. A , 1P >. ] ~R ) )
Theorem	map2psrprg 7806*	Equivalence for positive signed real. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
|- ( C e. R. -> ( ( C +R -1R ) <R A <-> E. x e. P. ( C +R [ <. x , 1P >. ] ~R ) = A ) )
Theorem	suplocsrlemb 7807*	Lemma for suplocsr 7810. The set B is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2024.)
|- B = { w e. P. | ( C +R [ <. w , 1P >. ] ~R ) e. A }   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ R. )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. A. y e. A y <R x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. R. A. y e. R. ( x <R y -> ( E. z e. A x <R z \/ A. z e. A z <R y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. u e. P. A. v e. P. ( u <P v -> ( E. q e. B u <P q \/ A. q e. B q <P v ) ) )
Theorem	suplocsrlempr 7808*	Lemma for suplocsr 7810. The set B has a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2024.)
|- B = { w e. P. | ( C +R [ <. w , 1P >. ] ~R ) e. A }   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ R. )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. A. y e. A y <R x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. R. A. y e. R. ( x <R y -> ( E. z e. A x <R z \/ A. z e. A z <R y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. v e. P. ( A. w e. B -. v <P w /\ A. w e. P. ( w <P v -> E. u e. B w <P u ) ) )
Theorem	suplocsrlem 7809*	Lemma for suplocsr 7810. The set A has a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2024.)
|- B = { w e. P. | ( C +R [ <. w , 1P >. ] ~R ) e. A }   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ R. )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. A. y e. A y <R x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. R. A. y e. R. ( x <R y -> ( E. z e. A x <R z \/ A. z e. A z <R y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. ( A. y e. A -. x <R y /\ A. y e. R. ( y <R x -> E. z e. A y <R z ) ) )
Theorem	suplocsr 7810*	An inhabited, bounded, located set of signed reals has a supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ph -> E. x x e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. A. y e. A y <R x )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. R. A. y e. R. ( x <R y -> ( E. z e. A x <R z \/ A. z e. A z <R y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. R. ( A. y e. A -. x <R y /\ A. y e. R. ( y <R x -> E. z e. A y <R z ) ) )
Syntax	cc 7811	Class of complex numbers.
class CC
Syntax	cr 7812	Class of real numbers.
class RR
Syntax	cc0 7813	Extend class notation to include the complex number 0.
class 0
Syntax	c1 7814	Extend class notation to include the complex number 1.
class 1
Syntax	ci 7815	Extend class notation to include the complex number i.
class _i
Syntax	caddc 7816	Addition on complex numbers.
class +
Syntax	cltrr 7817	'Less than' predicate (defined over real subset of complex numbers).
class <RR
Syntax	cmul 7818	Multiplication on complex numbers. The token x. is a center dot.
class x.
Definition	df-c 7819	Define the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- CC = ( R. X. R. )
Definition	df-0 7820	Define the complex number 0. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- 0 = <. 0R , 0R >.
Definition	df-1 7821	Define the complex number 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- 1 = <. 1R , 0R >.
Definition	df-i 7822	Define the complex number _i (the imaginary unit). (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- _i = <. 0R , 1R >.
Definition	df-r 7823	Define the set of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- RR = ( R. X. { 0R } )
Definition	df-add 7824*	Define addition over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- + = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. CC /\ y e. CC ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = <. ( w +R u ) , ( v +R f ) >. ) ) }
Definition	df-mul 7825*	Define multiplication over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|- x. = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. CC /\ y e. CC ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = <. ( ( w .R u ) +R ( -1R .R ( v .R f ) ) ) , ( ( v .R u ) +R ( w .R f ) ) >. ) ) }
Definition	df-lt 7826*	Define 'less than' on the real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- <RR = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. RR /\ y e. RR ) /\ E. z E. w ( ( x = <. z , 0R >. /\ y = <. w , 0R >. ) /\ z <R w ) ) }
Theorem	opelcn 7827	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.)
|- ( <. A , B >. e. CC <-> ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) )
Theorem	opelreal 7828	Ordered pair membership in class of real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( <. A , 0R >. e. RR <-> A e. R. )
Theorem	elreal 7829*	Membership in class of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
|- ( A e. RR <-> E. x e. R. <. x , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	elrealeu 7830*	The real number mapping in elreal 7829 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( A e. RR <-> E! x e. R. <. x , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	elreal2 7831	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.)
|- ( A e. RR <-> ( ( 1st ` A ) e. R. /\ A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , 0R >. ) )
Theorem	0ncn 7832	The empty set is not a complex number. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. See also cnm 7833 which is a related property. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.)
|- -. (/) e. CC
Theorem	cnm 7833*	A complex number is an inhabited set. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x x e. A )
Theorem	ltrelre 7834	'Less than' is a relation on real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- <RR C_ ( RR X. RR )
Theorem	addcnsr 7835	Addition of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. + <. C , D >. ) = <. ( A +R C ) , ( B +R D ) >. )
Theorem	mulcnsr 7836	Multiplication of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. x. <. C , D >. ) = <. ( ( A .R C ) +R ( -1R .R ( B .R D ) ) ) , ( ( B .R C ) +R ( A .R D ) ) >. )
Theorem	eqresr 7837	Equality of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , 0R >. = <. B , 0R >. <-> A = B )
Theorem	addresr 7838	Addition of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) -> ( <. A , 0R >. + <. B , 0R >. ) = <. ( A +R B ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	mulresr 7839	Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) -> ( <. A , 0R >. x. <. B , 0R >. ) = <. ( A .R B ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	ltresr 7840	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( <. A , 0R >. <RR <. B , 0R >. <-> A <R B )
Theorem	ltresr2 7841	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B <-> ( 1st ` A ) <R ( 1st ` B ) ) )
Theorem	dfcnqs 7842	Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in CC from those in R.. The trick involves qsid 6602, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that CC is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 7819), and allows us to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- CC = ( ( R. X. R. ) /. `' _E )
Theorem	addcnsrec 7843	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 7842 and mulcnsrec 7844. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E + [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( A +R C ) , ( B +R D ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	mulcnsrec 7844	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecidg 6601, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 7842. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( A e. R. /\ B e. R. ) /\ ( C e. R. /\ D e. R. ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] `' _E x. [ <. C , D >. ] `' _E ) = [ <. ( ( A .R C ) +R ( -1R .R ( B .R D ) ) ) , ( ( B .R C ) +R ( A .R D ) ) >. ] `' _E )
Theorem	addvalex 7845	Existence of a sum. This is dependent on how we define + so once we proceed to real number axioms we will replace it with theorems such as addcl 7938. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A + B ) e. _V )
Theorem	pitonnlem1 7846*	Lemma for pitonn 7849. Two ways to write the number one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. 1o , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = 1
Theorem	pitonnlem1p1 7847	Lemma for pitonn 7849. Simplifying an expression involving signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Apr-2020.)
|- ( A e. P. -> [ <. ( A +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) , ( 1P +P. 1P ) >. ] ~R = [ <. ( A +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R )
Theorem	pitonnlem2 7848*	Lemma for pitonn 7849. Two ways to add one to a number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2020.)
|- ( K e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. + 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. ( K +N 1o ) , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitonn 7849*	Mapping from N. to NN. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } )
Theorem	pitoregt0 7850*	Embedding from N. to RR yields a number greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> 0 <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	pitore 7851*	Embedding from N. to RR. Similar to pitonn 7849 but separate in the sense that we have not proved nnssre 8925 yet. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	recnnre 7852*	Embedding the reciprocal of a natural number into RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. e. RR )
Theorem	peano1nnnn 7853*	One is an element of NN. This is a counterpart to 1nn 8932 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7901). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- 1 e. N
Theorem	peano2nnnn 7854*	A successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. This is a counterpart to peano2nn 8933 designed for real number axioms which involve to natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7901). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ( A + 1 ) e. N )
Theorem	ltrennb 7855*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( J e. N. /\ K e. N. ) -> ( J <N K <-> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) )
Theorem	ltrenn 7856*	Ordering of natural numbers with <N or <RR. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2021.)
|- ( J <N K -> <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. <RR <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. K , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	recidpipr 7857*	Another way of saying that a number times its reciprocal is one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. .P. <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. ) = 1P )
Theorem	recidpirqlemcalc 7858	Lemma for recidpirq 7859. Rearranging some of the expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. P. )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A .P. B ) = 1P )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) +P. ( 1P .P. 1P ) ) +P. 1P ) = ( ( ( ( A +P. 1P ) .P. 1P ) +P. ( 1P .P. ( B +P. 1P ) ) ) +P. ( 1P +P. 1P ) ) )
Theorem	recidpirq 7859*	A real number times its reciprocal is one, where reciprocal is expressed with *Q. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = 1 )
4.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axcnex 7860	The complex numbers form a set. Use cnex 7937 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	axresscn 7861	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 7905. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- RR C_ CC
Theorem	ax1cn 7862	1 is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 7906. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. CC
Theorem	ax1re 7863	1 is a real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1re 7907. In the Metamath Proof Explorer, this is not a complex number axiom but is proved from ax-1cn 7906 and the other axioms. It is not known whether we can do so here, but the Metamath Proof Explorer proof (accessed 13-Jan-2020) uses excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 1 e. RR
Theorem	axicn 7864	_i is a complex number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 7908. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- _i e. CC
Theorem	axaddcl 7865	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 7909 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 7938. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axaddrcl 7866	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 7910 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 7939. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axmulcl 7867	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 7911 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 7940. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	axmulrcl 7868	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 7912 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 7941. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Theorem	axaddf 7869	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 7865. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 7935. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axmulf 7870	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axmulcl 7867. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulf 7936. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	axaddcom 7871	Addition commutes. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcom 7913 be used later. Instead, use addcom 8096. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on real number trichotomy and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	axmulcom 7872	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 7914 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 7942. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	axaddass 7873	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 7915 be used later. Instead, use addass 7943. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	axmulass 7874	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 7916. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axdistr 7875	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 7917 be used later. Instead, use adddi 7945. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	axi2m1 7876	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 7918. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( _i x. _i ) + 1 ) = 0
Theorem	ax0lt1 7877	0 is less than 1. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0lt1 7919. The version of this axiom in the Metamath Proof Explorer reads 1 =/= 0; here we change it to 0 <RR 1. The proof of 0 <RR 1 from 1 =/= 0 in the Metamath Proof Explorer (accessed 12-Jan-2020) relies on real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- 0 <RR 1
Theorem	ax1rid 7878	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 7920. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	ax0id 7879	0 is an identity element for real addition. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-0id 7921. In the Metamath Proof Explorer this is not a complex number axiom but is instead proved from other axioms. That proof relies on excluded middle and it is not known whether it is possible to prove this from the other axioms without excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	axrnegex 7880*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 7922. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. x e. RR ( A + x ) = 0 )
Theorem	axprecex 7881*	Existence of positive reciprocal of positive real number. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-precex 7923. In treatments which assume excluded middle, the 0 <RR A condition is generally replaced by A =/= 0, and it may not be necessary to state that the reciproacal is positive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x /\ ( A x. x ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	axcnre 7882*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 7924. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-ltirr 7883	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltirr 7925. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A <RR A )
Theorem	axpre-ltwlin 7884	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltwlin 7926. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( A <RR C \/ C <RR B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 7885	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 7927. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <RR B /\ B <RR C ) -> A <RR C ) )
Theorem	axpre-apti 7886	Apartness of reals is tight. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-apti 7928. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ -. ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) -> A = B )
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 7887	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 7929. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 7888	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 7930. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Theorem	axpre-mulext 7889	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulext 7931. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Theorem	rereceu 7890*	The reciprocal from axprecex 7881 is unique. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ 0 <RR A ) -> E! x e. RR ( A x. x ) = 1 )
Theorem	recriota 7891*	Two ways to express the reciprocal of a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( N e. N. -> ( iota_ r e. RR ( <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. x. r ) = 1 ) = <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. N , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. )
Theorem	axarch 7892*	Archimedean axiom. The Archimedean property is more naturally stated once we have defined NN. Unless we find another way to state it, we'll just use the right hand side of dfnn2 8923 in stating what we mean by "natural number" in the context of this axiom. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-arch 7932. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Theorem	peano5nnnn 7893*	Peano's inductive postulate. This is a counterpart to peano5nni 8924 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7901). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( ( 1 e. A /\ A. z e. A ( z + 1 ) e. A ) -> N C_ A )
Theorem	nnindnn 7894*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). This is a counterpart to nnind 8937 designed for real number axioms which involve natural numbers (notably, axcaucvg 7901). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( z = 1 -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( z = k -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( k + 1 ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( k e. N -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. N -> ta )
Theorem	nntopi 7895*	Mapping from NN to N.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   =>    |- ( A e. N -> E. z e. N. <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. z , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. = A )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcl 7896*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7901. Mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) e. R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemf 7897*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7901. Mapping to N. and R. yields a sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G : N. --> R. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemval 7898*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7901. Value of sequence when mapping to N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ J e. N. ) -> ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. J , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. ( G ` J ) , 0R >. )
Theorem	axcaucvglemcau 7899*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7901. The result of mapping to N. and R. satisfies the Cauchy condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N. A. k e. N. ( n <N k -> ( ( G ` n ) <R ( ( G ` k ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) /\ ( G ` k ) <R ( ( G ` n ) +R [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) } , { u | ( *Q ` [ <. n , 1o >. ] ~Q ) <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R ) ) ) )
Theorem	axcaucvglemres 7900*	Lemma for axcaucvg 7901. Mapping the limit from N. and R.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- G = ( j e. N. |-> ( iota_ z e. R. ( F ` <. [ <. ( <. { l | l <Q [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q } , { u | [ <. j , 1o >. ] ~Q <Q u } >. +P. 1P ) , 1P >. ] ~R , 0R >. ) = <. z , 0R >. ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )