P. 84 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8301-8400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 8301	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 8259. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A <RR B -> ( C + A ) <RR ( C + B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 8302	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 8260. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( ( 0 <RR A /\ 0 <RR B ) -> 0 <RR ( A x. B ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-mulext 8303	Strong extensionality of multiplication (expressed in terms of <RR). Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulext 8261 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A x. C ) <RR ( B x. C ) -> ( A <RR B \/ B <RR A ) ) )
Axiom	ax-arch 8304*	Archimedean axiom. Definition 3.1(2) of [Geuvers], p. 9. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axarch 8264. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use arch 9571 (which is the same, but stated in terms of NN and <). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. RR -> E. n e. |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) } A <RR n )
Axiom	ax-caucvg 8305*	Completeness. Axiom for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcaucvg 8273. A Cauchy sequence (as defined here, which has a rate convergence built in) of real numbers converges to a real number. Specifically on rate of convergence, all terms after the nth term must be within 1 / n of the nth term. This axiom should not be used directly; instead use caucvgre 11769 (which is the same, but stated in terms of the NN and 1 / n notations). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- N = |^| { x | ( 1 e. x /\ A. y e. x ( y + 1 ) e. x ) }   &    |- ( ph -> F : N --> RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N A. k e. N ( n <RR k -> ( ( F ` n ) <RR ( ( F ` k ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) /\ ( F ` k ) <RR ( ( F ` n ) + ( iota_ r e. RR ( n x. r ) = 1 ) ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. RR A. x e. RR ( 0 <RR x -> E. j e. N A. k e. N ( j <RR k -> ( ( F ` k ) <RR ( y + x ) /\ y <RR ( ( F ` k ) + x ) ) ) ) )
Axiom	ax-pre-suploc 8306*	An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Locatedness here means that given x < y, either there is an element of the set greater than x, or y is an upper bound. Although this and ax-caucvg 8305 are both completeness properties, countable choice would probably be needed to derive this from ax-caucvg 8305. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ ( E. x e. RR A. y e. A y <RR x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <RR y -> ( E. z e. A x <RR z \/ A. z e. A z <RR y ) ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A -. x <RR y /\ A. y e. RR ( y <RR x -> E. z e. A y <RR z ) ) )
Axiom	ax-addf 8307	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 8310 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 8307 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x + y ) ) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 8241. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- + : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Axiom	ax-mulf 8308	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This axiom tells us that x. is defined only on complex numbers which is analogous to the way that other operations are defined, for example see subf 8535 or eff 12455. However, while Metamath can handle this axiom, if we wish to work with weaker complex number axioms, we can avoid it by using the less specific mulcl 8312. Note that uses of ax-mulf 8308 can be eliminated by using the defined operation ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x x. y ) ) in place of x., as seen in mpomulf 8322. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 8242. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- x. : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
4.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
4.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 8309	Alias for ax-cnex 8276. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
|- CC e. _V
Theorem	addcl 8310	Alias for ax-addcl 8281, for naming consistency with addcli 8336. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 8281 or axaddcl 8237. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	readdcl 8311	Alias for ax-addrcl 8282, for naming consistency with readdcli 8345. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	mulcl 8312	Alias for ax-mulcl 8283, for naming consistency with mulcli 8337. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	remulcl 8313	Alias for ax-mulrcl 8284, for naming consistency with remulcli 8346. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
Theorem	mulcom 8314	Alias for ax-mulcom 8286, for naming consistency with mulcomi 8338. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	addass 8315	Alias for ax-addass 8287, for naming consistency with addassi 8340. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	mulass 8316	Alias for ax-mulass 8288, for naming consistency with mulassi 8341. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddi 8317	Alias for ax-distr 8289, for naming consistency with adddii 8342. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	recn 8318	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A e. CC )
Theorem	reex 8319	The real numbers form a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
|- RR e. _V
Theorem	reelprrecn 8320	Reals are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- RR e. { RR , CC }
Theorem	cnelprrecn 8321	Complex numbers are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- CC e. { RR , CC }
Theorem	mpomulf 8322*	Multiplication is an operation on complex numbers. Version of ax-mulf 8308 using maps-to notation, proved from the axioms of set theory and ax-mulcl 8283. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
|- ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( x x. y ) ) : ( CC X. CC ) --> CC
Theorem	adddir 8323	Distributive law for complex numbers (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) + ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	0cn 8324	0 is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.)
|- 0 e. CC
Theorem	0cnd 8325	0 is a complex number, deductive form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 0 e. CC )
Theorem	c0ex 8326	0 is a set (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
|- 0 e. _V
Theorem	1ex 8327	1 is a set. Common special case. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
|- 1 e. _V
Theorem	cnre 8328*	Alias for ax-cnre 8296, for naming consistency. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> E. x e. RR E. y e. RR A = ( x + ( _i x. y ) ) )
Theorem	mulrid 8329	1 is an identity element for multiplication. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	mullid 8330	Identity law for multiplication. Note: see mulrid 8329 for commuted version. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( 1 x. A ) = A )
Theorem	1re 8331	1 is a real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jan-2020.)
|- 1 e. RR
Theorem	0re 8332	0 is a real number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- 0 e. RR
Theorem	0red 8333	0 is a real number, deductive form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 0 e. RR )
Theorem	mulridi 8334	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. 1 ) = A
Theorem	mullidi 8335	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( 1 x. A ) = A
Theorem	addcli 8336	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A + B ) e. CC
Theorem	mulcli 8337	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. B ) e. CC
Theorem	mulcomi 8338	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A )
Theorem	mulcomli 8339	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- ( A x. B ) = C   =>    |- ( B x. A ) = C
Theorem	addassi 8340	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) )
Theorem	mulassi 8341	Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) )
Theorem	adddii 8342	Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) )
Theorem	adddiri 8343	Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) + ( B x. C ) )
Theorem	recni 8344	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
|- A e. RR   =>    |- A e. CC
Theorem	readdcli 8345	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A + B ) e. RR
Theorem	remulcli 8346	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A x. B ) e. RR
Theorem	1red 8347	1 is an real number, deductive form (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 1 e. RR )
Theorem	1cnd 8348	1 is a complex number, deductive form (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ph -> 1 e. CC )
Theorem	mulridd 8349	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. 1 ) = A )
Theorem	mullidd 8350	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( 1 x. A ) = A )
Theorem	addcld 8351	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + B ) e. CC )
Theorem	mulcld 8352	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. B ) e. CC )
Theorem	mulcomd 8353	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. B ) = ( B x. A ) )
Theorem	addassd 8354	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( A + ( B + C ) ) )
Theorem	mulassd 8355	Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddid 8356	Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A x. B ) + ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddird 8357	Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) + ( B x. C ) ) )
Theorem	adddirp1d 8358	Distributive law, plus 1 version. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + 1 ) x. B ) = ( ( A x. B ) + B ) )
Theorem	joinlmuladdmuld 8359	Join AB+CB into (A+C) on LHS. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 26-Oct-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) + ( C x. B ) ) = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + C ) x. B ) = D )
Theorem	recnd 8360	Deduction from real number to complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. CC )
Theorem	readdcld 8361	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + B ) e. RR )
Theorem	remulcld 8362	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. B ) e. RR )
4.2.2  Infinity and the extended real number system
Syntax	cpnf 8363	Plus infinity.
class +oo
Syntax	cmnf 8364	Minus infinity.
class -oo
Syntax	cxr 8365	The set of extended reals (includes plus and minus infinity).
class RR*
Syntax	clt 8366	'Less than' predicate (extended to include the extended reals).
class <
Syntax	cle 8367	Extend wff notation to include the 'less than or equal to' relation.
class <_
Definition	df-pnf 8368	Define plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that +oo be a set not in RR and different from -oo (df-mnf 8369). We use ~P U. CC to make it independent of the construction of CC, and Cantor's Theorem will show that it is different from any member of CC and therefore RR. See pnfnre 8373 and mnfnre 8374, and we'll also be able to prove +oo =/= -oo. A simpler possibility is to define +oo as CC and -oo as { CC }, but that approach requires the Axiom of Regularity to show that +oo and -oo are different from each other and from all members of RR. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- +oo = ~P U. CC
Definition	df-mnf 8369	Define minus infinity as the power set of plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that -oo be a set not in RR and different from +oo (see mnfnre 8374). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- -oo = ~P +oo
Definition	df-xr 8370	Define the set of extended reals that includes plus and minus infinity. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- RR* = ( RR u. { +oo , -oo } )
Definition	df-ltxr 8371*	Define 'less than' on the set of extended reals. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. Note that in our postulates for complex numbers, <RR is primitive and not necessarily a relation on RR. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- < = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. RR /\ y e. RR /\ x <RR y ) } u. ( ( ( RR u. { -oo } ) X. { +oo } ) u. ( { -oo } X. RR ) ) )
Definition	df-le 8372	Define 'less than or equal to' on the extended real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- <_ = ( ( RR* X. RR* ) \ `' < )
Theorem	pnfnre 8373	Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- +oo e/ RR
Theorem	mnfnre 8374	Minus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- -oo e/ RR
Theorem	ressxr 8375	The standard reals are a subset of the extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- RR C_ RR*
Theorem	rexpssxrxp 8376	The Cartesian product of standard reals are a subset of the Cartesian product of extended reals (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- ( RR X. RR ) C_ ( RR* X. RR* )
Theorem	rexr 8377	A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A e. RR* )
Theorem	0xr 8378	Zero is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.)
|- 0 e. RR*
Theorem	renepnf 8379	No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A =/= +oo )
Theorem	renemnf 8380	No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A =/= -oo )
Theorem	rexrd 8381	A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. RR* )
Theorem	renepnfd 8382	No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> A =/= +oo )
Theorem	renemnfd 8383	No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> A =/= -oo )
Theorem	pnfxr 8384	Plus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.)
|- +oo e. RR*
Theorem	pnfex 8385	Plus infinity exists (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- +oo e. _V
Theorem	pnfnemnf 8386	Plus and minus infinity are different elements of RR*. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- +oo =/= -oo
Theorem	mnfnepnf 8387	Minus and plus infinity are different (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- -oo =/= +oo
Theorem	mnfxr 8388	Minus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- -oo e. RR*
Theorem	rexri 8389	A standard real is an extended real (inference form.) (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
|- A e. RR   =>    |- A e. RR*
Theorem	1xr 8390	1 is an extended real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
|- 1 e. RR*
Theorem	renfdisj 8391	The reals and the infinities are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- ( RR i^i { +oo , -oo } ) = (/)
Theorem	ltrelxr 8392	'Less than' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|- < C_ ( RR* X. RR* )
Theorem	ltrel 8393	'Less than' is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- Rel <
Theorem	lerelxr 8394	'Less than or equal' is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|- <_ C_ ( RR* X. RR* )
Theorem	lerel 8395	'Less or equal to' is a relation. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|- Rel <_
Theorem	xrlenlt 8396	'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than', for extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR* /\ B e. RR* ) -> ( A <_ B <-> -. B < A ) )
Theorem	ltxrlt 8397	The standard less-than <RR and the extended real less-than < are identical when restricted to the non-extended reals RR. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A < B <-> A <RR B ) )
4.2.3  Restate the ordering postulates with extended real "less than"
Theorem	axltirr 8398	Real number less-than is irreflexive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltirr 8297 with ordering on the extended reals. New proofs should use ltnr 8408 instead for naming consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A < A )
Theorem	axltwlin 8399	Real number less-than is weakly linear. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-ltwlin 8298 with ordering on the extended reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( A < B -> ( A < C \/ C < B ) ) )
Theorem	axlttrn 8400	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from set theory. This restates ax-pre-lttrn 8299 with ordering on the extended reals. New proofs should use lttr 8405 instead for naming consistency. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A < B /\ B < C ) -> A < C ) )