P. 34 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3301-3400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	unss 3301	The union of two subclasses is a subclass. Theorem 27 of [Suppes] p. 27 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.)
|- ( ( A C_ C /\ B C_ C ) <-> ( A u. B ) C_ C )
Theorem	unssi 3302	An inference showing the union of two subclasses is a subclass. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Dec-2002.)
|- A C_ C   &    |- B C_ C   =>    |- ( A u. B ) C_ C
Theorem	unssd 3303	A deduction showing the union of two subclasses is a subclass. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ C )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A u. B ) C_ C )
Theorem	unssad 3304	If ( A u. B ) is contained in C, so is A. One-way deduction form of unss 3301. Partial converse of unssd 3303. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> ( A u. B ) C_ C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A C_ C )
Theorem	unssbd 3305	If ( A u. B ) is contained in C, so is B. One-way deduction form of unss 3301. Partial converse of unssd 3303. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> ( A u. B ) C_ C )   =>    |- ( ph -> B C_ C )
Theorem	ssun 3306	A condition that implies inclusion in the union of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2003.)
|- ( ( A C_ B \/ A C_ C ) -> A C_ ( B u. C ) )
Theorem	rexun 3307	Restricted existential quantification over union. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.)
|- ( E. x e. ( A u. B ) ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph \/ E. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	ralunb 3308	Restricted quantification over a union. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. ( A u. B ) ph <-> ( A. x e. A ph /\ A. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	ralun 3309	Restricted quantification over union. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ph /\ A. x e. B ph ) -> A. x e. ( A u. B ) ph )
2.1.13.3  The intersection of two classes
Theorem	elin 3310	Expansion of membership in an intersection of two classes. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A e. ( B i^i C ) <-> ( A e. B /\ A e. C ) )
Theorem	elini 3311	Membership in an intersection of two classes. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)
|- A e. B   &    |- A e. C   =>    |- A e. ( B i^i C )
Theorem	elind 3312	Deduce membership in an intersection of two classes. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ph -> X e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. B )   =>    |- ( ph -> X e. ( A i^i B ) )
Theorem	elinel1 3313	Membership in an intersection implies membership in the first set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( A e. ( B i^i C ) -> A e. B )
Theorem	elinel2 3314	Membership in an intersection implies membership in the second set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( A e. ( B i^i C ) -> A e. C )
Theorem	elin2 3315	Membership in a class defined as an intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Mar-2015.)
|- X = ( B i^i C )   =>    |- ( A e. X <-> ( A e. B /\ A e. C ) )
Theorem	elin1d 3316	Elementhood in the first set of an intersection - deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-May-2020.)
|- ( ph -> X e. ( A i^i B ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> X e. A )
Theorem	elin2d 3317	Elementhood in the first set of an intersection - deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-May-2020.)
|- ( ph -> X e. ( A i^i B ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> X e. B )
Theorem	elin3 3318	Membership in a class defined as a ternary intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Mar-2015.)
|- X = ( ( B i^i C ) i^i D )   =>    |- ( A e. X <-> ( A e. B /\ A e. C /\ A e. D ) )
Theorem	incom 3319	Commutative law for intersection of classes. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A i^i B ) = ( B i^i A )
Theorem	ineqri 3320*	Inference from membership to intersection. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ x e. B ) <-> x e. C )   =>    |- ( A i^i B ) = C
Theorem	ineq1 3321	Equality theorem for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A i^i C ) = ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	ineq2 3322	Equality theorem for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ( C i^i A ) = ( C i^i B ) )
Theorem	ineq12 3323	Equality theorem for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-1994.)
|- ( ( A = B /\ C = D ) -> ( A i^i C ) = ( B i^i D ) )
Theorem	ineq1i 3324	Equality inference for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( A i^i C ) = ( B i^i C )
Theorem	ineq2i 3325	Equality inference for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1993.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( C i^i A ) = ( C i^i B )
Theorem	ineq12i 3326	Equality inference for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 26-Jan-2007.)
|- A = B   &    |- C = D   =>    |- ( A i^i C ) = ( B i^i D )
Theorem	ineq1d 3327	Equality deduction for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A i^i C ) = ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	ineq2d 3328	Equality deduction for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( C i^i A ) = ( C i^i B ) )
Theorem	ineq12d 3329	Equality deduction for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A i^i C ) = ( B i^i D ) )
Theorem	ineqan12d 3330	Equality deduction for intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ps -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( A i^i C ) = ( B i^i D ) )
Theorem	dfss1 3331	A frequently-used variant of subclass definition df-ss 3134. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.)
|- ( A C_ B <-> ( B i^i A ) = A )
Theorem	dfss5 3332	Another definition of subclasshood. Similar to df-ss 3134, dfss 3135, and dfss1 3331. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( A C_ B <-> A = ( B i^i A ) )
Theorem	nfin 3333	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the intersection of classes. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x ( A i^i B )
Theorem	csbing 3334	Distribute proper substitution through an intersection relation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.)
|- ( A e. B -> [_ A / x ]_ ( C i^i D ) = ( [_ A / x ]_ C i^i [_ A / x ]_ D ) )
Theorem	rabbi2dva 3335*	Deduction from a wff to a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( x e. B <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A i^i B ) = { x e. A | ps } )
Theorem	inidm 3336	Idempotent law for intersection of classes. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A i^i A ) = A
Theorem	inass 3337	Associative law for intersection of classes. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1994.)
|- ( ( A i^i B ) i^i C ) = ( A i^i ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	in12 3338	A rearrangement of intersection. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2001.)
|- ( A i^i ( B i^i C ) ) = ( B i^i ( A i^i C ) )
Theorem	in32 3339	A rearrangement of intersection. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2001.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( A i^i B ) i^i C ) = ( ( A i^i C ) i^i B )
Theorem	in13 3340	A rearrangement of intersection. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2012.)
|- ( A i^i ( B i^i C ) ) = ( C i^i ( B i^i A ) )
Theorem	in31 3341	A rearrangement of intersection. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2012.)
|- ( ( A i^i B ) i^i C ) = ( ( C i^i B ) i^i A )
Theorem	inrot 3342	Rotate the intersection of 3 classes. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2012.)
|- ( ( A i^i B ) i^i C ) = ( ( C i^i A ) i^i B )
Theorem	in4 3343	Rearrangement of intersection of 4 classes. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2001.)
|- ( ( A i^i B ) i^i ( C i^i D ) ) = ( ( A i^i C ) i^i ( B i^i D ) )
Theorem	inindi 3344	Intersection distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1994.)
|- ( A i^i ( B i^i C ) ) = ( ( A i^i B ) i^i ( A i^i C ) )
Theorem	inindir 3345	Intersection distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
|- ( ( A i^i B ) i^i C ) = ( ( A i^i C ) i^i ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	sseqin2 3346	A relationship between subclass and intersection. Similar to Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1994.)
|- ( A C_ B <-> ( B i^i A ) = A )
Theorem	inss1 3347	The intersection of two classes is a subset of one of them. Part of Exercise 12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A i^i B ) C_ A
Theorem	inss2 3348	The intersection of two classes is a subset of one of them. Part of Exercise 12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A i^i B ) C_ B
Theorem	ssin 3349	Subclass of intersection. Theorem 2.8(vii) of [Monk1] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( A C_ B /\ A C_ C ) <-> A C_ ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	ssini 3350	An inference showing that a subclass of two classes is a subclass of their intersection. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2003.)
|- A C_ B   &    |- A C_ C   =>    |- A C_ ( B i^i C )
Theorem	ssind 3351	A deduction showing that a subclass of two classes is a subclass of their intersection. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	ssrin 3352	Add right intersection to subclass relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A C_ B -> ( A i^i C ) C_ ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	sslin 3353	Add left intersection to subclass relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.)
|- ( A C_ B -> ( C i^i A ) C_ ( C i^i B ) )
Theorem	ssrind 3354	Add right intersection to subclass relation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A i^i C ) C_ ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	ss2in 3355	Intersection of subclasses. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.)
|- ( ( A C_ B /\ C C_ D ) -> ( A i^i C ) C_ ( B i^i D ) )
Theorem	ssinss1 3356	Intersection preserves subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.)
|- ( A C_ C -> ( A i^i B ) C_ C )
Theorem	inss 3357	Inclusion of an intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ( A C_ C \/ B C_ C ) -> ( A i^i B ) C_ C )
2.1.13.4  Combinations of difference, union, and intersection of two classes
Theorem	unabs 3358	Absorption law for union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2006.)
|- ( A u. ( A i^i B ) ) = A
Theorem	inabs 3359	Absorption law for intersection. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2006.)
|- ( A i^i ( A u. B ) ) = A
Theorem	dfss4st 3360*	Subclass defined in terms of class difference. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. xSTAB x e. A -> ( A C_ B <-> ( B \ ( B \ A ) ) = A ) )
Theorem	ssddif 3361	Double complement and subset. Similar to ddifss 3365 but inside a class B instead of the universal class _V. In classical logic the subset operation on the right hand side could be an equality (that is, A C_ B <-> ( B \ ( B \ A ) ) = A). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2018.)
|- ( A C_ B <-> A C_ ( B \ ( B \ A ) ) )
Theorem	unssdif 3362	Union of two classes and class difference. In classical logic this would be an equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2018.)
|- ( A u. B ) C_ ( _V \ ( ( _V \ A ) \ B ) )
Theorem	inssdif 3363	Intersection of two classes and class difference. In classical logic this would be an equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2018.)
|- ( A i^i B ) C_ ( A \ ( _V \ B ) )
Theorem	difin 3364	Difference with intersection. Theorem 33 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A \ ( A i^i B ) ) = ( A \ B )
Theorem	ddifss 3365	Double complement under universal class. In classical logic (or given an additional hypothesis, as in ddifnel 3258), this is equality rather than subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2018.)
|- A C_ ( _V \ ( _V \ A ) )
Theorem	unssin 3366	Union as a subset of class complement and intersection (De Morgan's law). One direction of the definition of union in [Mendelson] p. 231. This would be an equality, rather than subset, in classical logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jul-2018.)
|- ( A u. B ) C_ ( _V \ ( ( _V \ A ) i^i ( _V \ B ) ) )
Theorem	inssun 3367	Intersection in terms of class difference and union (De Morgan's law). Similar to Exercise 4.10(n) of [Mendelson] p. 231. This would be an equality, rather than subset, in classical logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jul-2018.)
|- ( A i^i B ) C_ ( _V \ ( ( _V \ A ) u. ( _V \ B ) ) )
Theorem	inssddif 3368	Intersection of two classes and class difference. In classical logic, such as Exercise 4.10(q) of [Mendelson] p. 231, this is an equality rather than subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2018.)
|- ( A i^i B ) C_ ( A \ ( A \ B ) )
Theorem	invdif 3369	Intersection with universal complement. Remark in [Stoll] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
|- ( A i^i ( _V \ B ) ) = ( A \ B )
Theorem	indif 3370	Intersection with class difference. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
|- ( A i^i ( A \ B ) ) = ( A \ B )
Theorem	indif2 3371	Bring an intersection in and out of a class difference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Jul-2009.)
|- ( A i^i ( B \ C ) ) = ( ( A i^i B ) \ C )
Theorem	indif1 3372	Bring an intersection in and out of a class difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A \ C ) i^i B ) = ( ( A i^i B ) \ C )
Theorem	indifcom 3373	Commutation law for intersection and difference. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
|- ( A i^i ( B \ C ) ) = ( B i^i ( A \ C ) )
Theorem	indi 3374	Distributive law for intersection over union. Exercise 10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A i^i ( B u. C ) ) = ( ( A i^i B ) u. ( A i^i C ) )
Theorem	undi 3375	Distributive law for union over intersection. Exercise 11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A u. ( B i^i C ) ) = ( ( A u. B ) i^i ( A u. C ) )
Theorem	indir 3376	Distributive law for intersection over union. Theorem 28 of [Suppes] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
|- ( ( A u. B ) i^i C ) = ( ( A i^i C ) u. ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	undir 3377	Distributive law for union over intersection. Theorem 29 of [Suppes] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
|- ( ( A i^i B ) u. C ) = ( ( A u. C ) i^i ( B u. C ) )
Theorem	uneqin 3378	Equality of union and intersection implies equality of their arguments. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( A u. B ) = ( A i^i B ) <-> A = B )
Theorem	difundi 3379	Distributive law for class difference. Theorem 39 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
|- ( A \ ( B u. C ) ) = ( ( A \ B ) i^i ( A \ C ) )
Theorem	difundir 3380	Distributive law for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
|- ( ( A u. B ) \ C ) = ( ( A \ C ) u. ( B \ C ) )
Theorem	difindiss 3381	Distributive law for class difference. In classical logic, for example, theorem 40 of [Suppes] p. 29, this is an equality instead of subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2018.)
|- ( ( A \ B ) u. ( A \ C ) ) C_ ( A \ ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	difindir 3382	Distributive law for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
|- ( ( A i^i B ) \ C ) = ( ( A \ C ) i^i ( B \ C ) )
Theorem	indifdir 3383	Distribute intersection over difference. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2011.)
|- ( ( A \ B ) i^i C ) = ( ( A i^i C ) \ ( B i^i C ) )
Theorem	difdif2ss 3384	Set difference with a set difference. In classical logic this would be equality rather than subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2018.)
|- ( ( A \ B ) u. ( A i^i C ) ) C_ ( A \ ( B \ C ) )
Theorem	undm 3385	De Morgan's law for union. Theorem 5.2(13) of [Stoll] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2004.)
|- ( _V \ ( A u. B ) ) = ( ( _V \ A ) i^i ( _V \ B ) )
Theorem	indmss 3386	De Morgan's law for intersection. In classical logic, this would be equality rather than subset, as in Theorem 5.2(13') of [Stoll] p. 19. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2018.)
|- ( ( _V \ A ) u. ( _V \ B ) ) C_ ( _V \ ( A i^i B ) )
Theorem	difun1 3387	A relationship involving double difference and union. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2004.)
|- ( A \ ( B u. C ) ) = ( ( A \ B ) \ C )
Theorem	undif3ss 3388	A subset relationship involving class union and class difference. In classical logic, this would be equality rather than subset, as in the first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2018.)
|- ( A u. ( B \ C ) ) C_ ( ( A u. B ) \ ( C \ A ) )
Theorem	difin2 3389	Represent a set difference as an intersection with a larger difference. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A C_ C -> ( A \ B ) = ( ( C \ B ) i^i A ) )
Theorem	dif32 3390	Swap second and third argument of double difference. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2004.)
|- ( ( A \ B ) \ C ) = ( ( A \ C ) \ B )
Theorem	difabs 3391	Absorption-like law for class difference: you can remove a class only once. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.)
|- ( ( A \ B ) \ B ) = ( A \ B )
Theorem	symdif1 3392	Two ways to express symmetric difference. This theorem shows the equivalence of the definition of symmetric difference in [Stoll] p. 13 and the restated definition in Example 4.1 of [Stoll] p. 262. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
|- ( ( A \ B ) u. ( B \ A ) ) = ( ( A u. B ) \ ( A i^i B ) )
2.1.13.5  Class abstractions with difference, union, and intersection of two classes
Theorem	symdifxor 3393*	Expressing symmetric difference with exclusive-or or two differences. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2018.)
|- ( ( A \ B ) u. ( B \ A ) ) = { x | ( x e. A \/_ x e. B ) }
Theorem	unab 3394	Union of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( { x | ph } u. { x | ps } ) = { x | ( ph \/ ps ) }
Theorem	inab 3395	Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( { x | ph } i^i { x | ps } ) = { x | ( ph /\ ps ) }
Theorem	difab 3396	Difference of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( { x | ph } \ { x | ps } ) = { x | ( ph /\ -. ps ) }
Theorem	notab 3397	A class builder defined by a negation. (Contributed by FL, 18-Sep-2010.)
|- { x | -. ph } = ( _V \ { x | ph } )
Theorem	unrab 3398	Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
|- ( { x e. A | ph } u. { x e. A | ps } ) = { x e. A | ( ph \/ ps ) }
Theorem	inrab 3399	Intersection of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2006.)
|- ( { x e. A | ph } i^i { x e. A | ps } ) = { x e. A | ( ph /\ ps ) }
Theorem	inrab2 3400*	Intersection with a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2007.)
|- ( { x e. A | ph } i^i B ) = { x e. ( A i^i B ) | ph }