P. 128 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 12701-12800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bezoutlembi 12701*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. Like bezoutlembz 12700 but the greatest common divisor condition is a biconditional, not just an implication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) -> E. d e. NN0 ( A. z e. ZZ ( z || d <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) /\ E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ d = ( ( A x. x ) + ( B x. y ) ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutlemmo 12702*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. There is at most one nonnegative integer meeting the greatest common divisor condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || D <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || E <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> D = E )
Theorem	bezoutlemeu 12703*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. There is exactly one nonnegative integer meeting the greatest common divisor condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || D <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E! d e. NN0 A. z e. ZZ ( z || d <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutlemle 12704*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. The number satisfying the greatest common divisor condition is the largest number which divides both A and B. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || D <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> -. ( A = 0 /\ B = 0 ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( ( z || A /\ z || B ) -> z <_ D ) )
Theorem	bezoutlemsup 12705*	Lemma for Bézout's identity. The number satisfying the greatest common divisor condition is the supremum of divisors of both A and B. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. ZZ ( z || D <-> ( z || A /\ z || B ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> -. ( A = 0 /\ B = 0 ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> D = sup ( { z e. ZZ | ( z || A /\ z || B ) } , RR , < ) )
Theorem	dfgcd3 12706*	Alternate definition of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2021.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M gcd N ) = ( iota_ d e. NN0 A. z e. ZZ ( z || d <-> ( z || M /\ z || N ) ) ) )
Theorem	bezout 12707*	Bézout's identity: For any integers A and B, there are integers x , y such that ( A gcd B ) = A x. x + B x. y. This is Metamath 100 proof #60. The proof is constructive, in the sense that it applies the Extended Euclidian Algorithm to constuct a number which can be shown to be ( A gcd B ) and which satisfies the rest of the theorem. In the presence of excluded middle, it is common to prove Bézout's identity by taking the smallest number which satisfies the Bézout condition, and showing it is the greatest common divisor. But we do not have the ability to show that number exists other than by providing a way to determine it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) -> E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ ( A gcd B ) = ( ( A x. x ) + ( B x. y ) ) )
Theorem	dvdsgcd 12708	An integer which divides each of two others also divides their gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K || M /\ K || N ) -> K || ( M gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	dvdsgcdb 12709	Biconditional form of dvdsgcd 12708. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K || M /\ K || N ) <-> K || ( M gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	dfgcd2 12710*	Alternate definition of the gcd operator, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 15. (Contributed by AV, 8-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( D = ( M gcd N ) <-> ( 0 <_ D /\ ( D || M /\ D || N ) /\ A. e e. ZZ ( ( e || M /\ e || N ) -> e || D ) ) ) )
Theorem	gcdass 12711	Associative law for gcd operator. Theorem 1.4(b) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( N e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ P e. ZZ ) -> ( ( N gcd M ) gcd P ) = ( N gcd ( M gcd P ) ) )
Theorem	mulgcd 12712	Distribute multiplication by a nonnegative integer over gcd. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
|- ( ( K e. NN0 /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K x. M ) gcd ( K x. N ) ) = ( K x. ( M gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	absmulgcd 12713	Distribute absolute value of multiplication over gcd. Theorem 1.4(c) in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K x. M ) gcd ( K x. N ) ) = ( abs ` ( K x. ( M gcd N ) ) ) )
Theorem	mulgcdr 12714	Reverse distribution law for the gcd operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ C e. NN0 ) -> ( ( A x. C ) gcd ( B x. C ) ) = ( ( A gcd B ) x. C ) )
Theorem	gcddiv 12715	Division law for GCD. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ C e. NN ) /\ ( C || A /\ C || B ) ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) / C ) = ( ( A / C ) gcd ( B / C ) ) )
Theorem	gcdmultiple 12716	The GCD of a multiple of a number is the number itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( M gcd ( M x. N ) ) = M )
Theorem	gcdmultiplez 12717	Extend gcdmultiple 12716 so N can be an integer. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M gcd ( M x. N ) ) = M )
Theorem	gcdzeq 12718	A positive integer A is equal to its gcd with an integer B if and only if A divides B. Generalization of gcdeq 12719. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. ZZ ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) = A <-> A || B ) )
Theorem	gcdeq 12719	A is equal to its gcd with B if and only if A divides B. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) = A <-> A || B ) )
Theorem	dvdssqim 12720	Unidirectional form of dvdssq 12727. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M || N -> ( M ^ 2 ) || ( N ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	dvdsmulgcd 12721	Relationship between the order of an element and that of a multiple. (a divisibility equivalent). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( B e. ZZ /\ C e. ZZ ) -> ( A || ( B x. C ) <-> A || ( B x. ( C gcd A ) ) ) )
Theorem	rpmulgcd 12722	If K and M are relatively prime, then the GCD of K and M x. N is the GCD of K and N. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( ( K e. NN /\ M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) /\ ( K gcd M ) = 1 ) -> ( K gcd ( M x. N ) ) = ( K gcd N ) )
Theorem	rplpwr 12723	If A and B are relatively prime, then so are A ^ N and B. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) = 1 -> ( ( A ^ N ) gcd B ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	rppwr 12724	If A and B are relatively prime, then so are A ^ N and B ^ N. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( A gcd B ) = 1 -> ( ( A ^ N ) gcd ( B ^ N ) ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	sqgcd 12725	Square distributes over gcd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( M gcd N ) ^ 2 ) = ( ( M ^ 2 ) gcd ( N ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	dvdssqlem 12726	Lemma for dvdssq 12727. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( M || N <-> ( M ^ 2 ) || ( N ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	dvdssq 12727	Two numbers are divisible iff their squares are. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M || N <-> ( M ^ 2 ) || ( N ^ 2 ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutr 12728	Partial converse to bezout 12707. Existence of a linear combination does not set the GCD, but it does upper bound it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) /\ ( X e. ZZ /\ Y e. ZZ ) ) -> ( A gcd B ) || ( ( A x. X ) + ( B x. Y ) ) )
Theorem	bezoutr1 12729	Converse of bezout 12707 for when the greater common divisor is one (sufficient condition for relative primality). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ ) /\ ( X e. ZZ /\ Y e. ZZ ) ) -> ( ( ( A x. X ) + ( B x. Y ) ) = 1 -> ( A gcd B ) = 1 ) )
5.1.7  Decidable sets of integers
Theorem	nnmindc 12730*	An inhabited decidable subset of the natural numbers has a minimum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.)
|- ( ( A C_ NN /\ A. x e. NN DECID x e. A /\ E. y y e. A ) -> inf ( A , RR , < ) e. A )
Theorem	nnminle 12731*	The infimum of a decidable subset of the natural numbers is less than an element of the set. The infimum is also a minimum as shown at nnmindc 12730. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2024.)
|- ( ( A C_ NN /\ A. x e. NN DECID x e. A /\ B e. A ) -> inf ( A , RR , < ) <_ B )
Theorem	nnwodc 12732*	Well-ordering principle: any inhabited decidable set of positive integers has a least element. Theorem I.37 (well-ordering principle) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2024.)
|- ( ( A C_ NN /\ E. w w e. A /\ A. j e. NN DECID j e. A ) -> E. x e. A A. y e. A x <_ y )
Theorem	uzwodc 12733*	Well-ordering principle: any inhabited decidable subset of an upper set of integers has a least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Oct-2024.)
|- ( ( S C_ ( ZZ>= ` M ) /\ E. x x e. S /\ A. x e. ( ZZ>= ` M )DECID x e. S ) -> E. j e. S A. k e. S j <_ k )
Theorem	nnwofdc 12734*	Well-ordering principle: any inhabited decidable set of positive integers has a least element. This version allows x and y to be present in A as long as they are effectively not free. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   =>    |- ( ( A C_ NN /\ E. z z e. A /\ A. j e. NN DECID j e. A ) -> E. x e. A A. y e. A x <_ y )
Theorem	nnwosdc 12735*	Well-ordering principle: any inhabited decidable set of positive integers has a least element (schema form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Oct-2024.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( E. x e. NN ph /\ A. x e. NN DECID ph ) -> E. x e. NN ( ph /\ A. y e. NN ( ps -> x <_ y ) ) )
Theorem	nninfctlemfo 12736*	Lemma for nninfct 12737. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2025.)
|- G = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- F = ( n e. om |-> ( i e. om |-> if ( i e. n , 1o , (/) ) ) )   &    |- I = ( ( F o. `' G ) u. { <. +oo , ( om X. { 1o } ) >. } )   =>    |- ( om e. Omni -> I :NN0* -onto->ℕ∞ )
Theorem	nninfct 12737	The limited principle of omniscience (LPO) implies that ℕ∞ is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2025.)
|- ( om e. Omni -> E. f f : om -onto-> (ℕ∞ ⊔ 1o ) )
5.1.8  Algorithms
Theorem	nn0seqcvgd 12738*	A strictly-decreasing nonnegative integer sequence with initial term N reaches zero by the N th term. Deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- ( ph -> F : NN0 --> NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> N = ( F ` 0 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) =/= 0 -> ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) < ( F ` k ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F ` N ) = 0 )
Theorem	ialgrlem1st 12739	Lemma for ialgr0 12741. Expressing algrflemg 6426 in a form suitable for theorems such as seq3-1 10824 or seqf 10826. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x ( F o. 1st ) y ) e. S )
Theorem	ialgrlemconst 12740	Lemma for ialgr0 12741. Closure of a constant function, in a form suitable for theorems such as seq3-1 10824 or seqf 10826. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( ( Z X. { A } ) ` x ) e. S )
Theorem	ialgr0 12741	The value of the algorithm iterator R at 0 is the initial state A. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Mar-2023.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- R = seq M ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( Z X. { A } ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( R ` M ) = A )
Theorem	algrf 12742	An algorithm is a step function F : S --> S on a state space S. An algorithm acts on an initial state A e. S by iteratively applying F to give A, ( F ` A ), ( F ` ( F ` A ) ) and so on. An algorithm is said to halt if a fixed point of F is reached after a finite number of iterations. The algorithm iterator R : NN0 --> S "runs" the algorithm F so that ( R ` k ) is the state after k iterations of F on the initial state A. Domain and codomain of the algorithm iterator R. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- R = seq M ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( Z X. { A } ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   =>    |- ( ph -> R : Z --> S )
Theorem	algrp1 12743	The value of the algorithm iterator R at ( K + 1 ). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Mar-2023.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- R = seq M ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( Z X. { A } ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> F : S --> S )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ K e. Z ) -> ( R ` ( K + 1 ) ) = ( F ` ( R ` K ) ) )
Theorem	alginv 12744*	If I is an invariant of F, then its value is unchanged after any number of iterations of F. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) )   &    |- F : S --> S   &    |- ( x e. S -> ( I ` ( F ` x ) ) = ( I ` x ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. S /\ K e. NN0 ) -> ( I ` ( R ` K ) ) = ( I ` ( R ` 0 ) ) )
Theorem	algcvg 12745*	One way to prove that an algorithm halts is to construct a countdown function C : S --> NN0 whose value is guaranteed to decrease for each iteration of F until it reaches 0. That is, if X e. S is not a fixed point of F, then ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) < ( C ` X ). If C is a countdown function for algorithm F, the sequence ( C ` ( R ` k ) ) reaches 0 after at most N steps, where N is the value of C for the initial state A. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) )   &    |- C : S --> NN0   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) < ( C ` z ) ) )   &    |- N = ( C ` A )   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ( C ` ( R ` N ) ) = 0 )
Theorem	algcvgblem 12746	Lemma for algcvgb 12747. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- ( ( M e. NN0 /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( ( N =/= 0 -> N < M ) <-> ( ( M =/= 0 -> N < M ) /\ ( M = 0 -> N = 0 ) ) ) )
Theorem	algcvgb 12747	Two ways of expressing that C is a countdown function for algorithm F. The first is used in these theorems. The second states the condition more intuitively as a conjunction: if the countdown function's value is currently nonzero, it must decrease at the next step; if it has reached zero, it must remain zero at the next step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- C : S --> NN0   =>    |- ( X e. S -> ( ( ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) < ( C ` X ) ) <-> ( ( ( C ` X ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) < ( C ` X ) ) /\ ( ( C ` X ) = 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` X ) ) = 0 ) ) ) )
Theorem	algcvga 12748*	The countdown function C remains 0 after N steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) )   &    |- C : S --> NN0   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) < ( C ` z ) ) )   &    |- N = ( C ` A )   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ( K e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) -> ( C ` ( R ` K ) ) = 0 ) )
Theorem	algfx 12749*	If F reaches a fixed point when the countdown function C reaches 0, F remains fixed after N steps. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- F : S --> S   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( F o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) )   &    |- C : S --> NN0   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) =/= 0 -> ( C ` ( F ` z ) ) < ( C ` z ) ) )   &    |- N = ( C ` A )   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( ( C ` z ) = 0 -> ( F ` z ) = z ) )   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ( K e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) -> ( R ` K ) = ( R ` N ) ) )
5.1.9  Euclid's Algorithm
Theorem	eucalgval2 12750*	The value of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm on an ordered pair. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( ( M e. NN0 /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( M E N ) = if ( N = 0 , <. M , N >. , <. N , ( M mod N ) >. ) )
Theorem	eucalgval 12751*	Euclid's Algorithm eucalg 12756 computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0. The value of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( X e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( E ` X ) = if ( ( 2nd ` X ) = 0 , X , <. ( 2nd ` X ) , ( mod ` X ) >. ) )
Theorem	eucalgf 12752*	Domain and codomain of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- E : ( NN0 X. NN0 ) --> ( NN0 X. NN0 )
Theorem	eucalginv 12753*	The invariant of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm is the gcd operator applied to the state. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( X e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( gcd ` ( E ` X ) ) = ( gcd ` X ) )
Theorem	eucalglt 12754*	The second member of the state decreases with each iteration of the step function E for Euclid's Algorithm. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   =>    |- ( X e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( ( 2nd ` ( E ` X ) ) =/= 0 -> ( 2nd ` ( E ` X ) ) < ( 2nd ` X ) ) )
Theorem	eucalgcvga 12755*	Once Euclid's Algorithm halts after N steps, the second element of the state remains 0 . (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( E o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) )   &    |- N = ( 2nd ` A )   =>    |- ( A e. ( NN0 X. NN0 ) -> ( K e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) -> ( 2nd ` ( R ` K ) ) = 0 ) )
Theorem	eucalg 12756*	Euclid's Algorithm computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly replacing the larger of them with its remainder modulo the smaller until the remainder is 0. Theorem 1.15 in [ApostolNT] p. 20. Upon halting, the 1st member of the final state ( R ` N ) is equal to the gcd of the values comprising the input state <. M , N >.. This is Metamath 100 proof #69 (greatest common divisor algorithm). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
|- E = ( x e. NN0 , y e. NN0 |-> if ( y = 0 , <. x , y >. , <. y , ( x mod y ) >. ) )   &    |- R = seq 0 ( ( E o. 1st ) , ( NN0 X. { A } ) )   &    |- A = <. M , N >.   =>    |- ( ( M e. NN0 /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( 1st ` ( R ` N ) ) = ( M gcd N ) )
5.1.10  The least common multiple According to Wikipedia ("Least common multiple", 27-Aug-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_common_multiple): "In arithmetic and number theory, the least common multiple, lowest common multiple, or smallest common multiple of two integers a and b, usually denoted by lcm(a, b), is the smallest positive integer that is divisible by both a and b. Since division of integers by zero is undefined, this definition has meaning only if a and b are both different from zero. However, some authors define lcm(a,0) as 0 for all a, which is the result of taking the lcm to be the least upper bound in the lattice of divisibility." In this section, an operation calculating the least common multiple of two integers (df-lcm 12758). The definition is valid for all integers, including negative integers and 0, obeying the above mentioned convention.
Syntax	clcm 12757	Extend the definition of a class to include the least common multiple operator.
class lcm
Definition	df-lcm 12758*	Define the lcm operator. For example, ( 6 lcm 9 ) = 1 8. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- lcm = ( x e. ZZ , y e. ZZ |-> if ( ( x = 0 \/ y = 0 ) , 0 , inf ( { n e. NN | ( x || n /\ y || n ) } , RR , < ) ) )
Theorem	lcmmndc 12759	Decidablity lemma used in various proofs related to lcm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> DECID ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) )
Theorem	lcmval 12760*	Value of the lcm operator. ( M lcm N ) is the least common multiple of M and N. If either M or N is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. Contrast with df-gcd 12650 and gcdval 12655. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm N ) = if ( ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) , 0 , inf ( { n e. NN | ( M || n /\ N || n ) } , RR , < ) ) )
Theorem	lcmcom 12761	The lcm operator is commutative. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm N ) = ( N lcm M ) )
Theorem	lcm0val 12762	The value, by convention, of the lcm operator when either operand is 0. (Use lcmcom 12761 for a left-hand 0.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M lcm 0 ) = 0 )
Theorem	lcmn0val 12763*	The value of the lcm operator when both operands are nonzero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) = inf ( { n e. NN | ( M || n /\ N || n ) } , RR , < ) )
Theorem	lcmcllem 12764*	Lemma for lcmn0cl 12765 and dvdslcm 12766. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) e. { n e. NN | ( M || n /\ N || n ) } )
Theorem	lcmn0cl 12765	Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) e. NN )
Theorem	dvdslcm 12766	The lcm of two integers is divisible by each of them. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M || ( M lcm N ) /\ N || ( M lcm N ) ) )
Theorem	lcmledvds 12767	A positive integer which both operands of the lcm operator divide bounds it. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( ( K e. NN /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ -. ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) -> ( M lcm N ) <_ K ) )
Theorem	lcmeq0 12768	The lcm of two integers is zero iff either is zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) = 0 <-> ( M = 0 \/ N = 0 ) ) )
Theorem	lcmcl 12769	Closure of the lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm N ) e. NN0 )
Theorem	gcddvdslcm 12770	The greatest common divisor of two numbers divides their least common multiple. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M gcd N ) || ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	lcmneg 12771	Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M lcm -u N ) = ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	neglcm 12772	Negating one operand of the lcm operator does not alter the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( -u M lcm N ) = ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	lcmabs 12773	The lcm of two integers is the same as that of their absolute values. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( abs ` M ) lcm ( abs ` N ) ) = ( M lcm N ) )
Theorem	lcmgcdlem 12774	Lemma for lcmgcd 12775 and lcmdvds 12776. Prove them for positive M, N, and K. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( ( M lcm N ) x. ( M gcd N ) ) = ( abs ` ( M x. N ) ) /\ ( ( K e. NN /\ ( M || K /\ N || K ) ) -> ( M lcm N ) || K ) ) )
Theorem	lcmgcd 12775	The product of two numbers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the absolute value of the product of the two numbers. In particular, that absolute value is the least common multiple of two coprime numbers, for which ( M gcd N ) = 1. Multiple methods exist for proving this, and it is often proven either as a consequence of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic or of Bézout's identity bezout 12707; see, e.g., https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_GCD_and_LCM 12707 and https://math.stackexchange.com/a/470827 12707. This proof uses the latter to first confirm it for positive integers M and N (the "Second Proof" in the above Stack Exchange page), then shows that implies it for all nonzero integer inputs, then finally uses lcm0val 12762 to show it applies when either or both inputs are zero. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) x. ( M gcd N ) ) = ( abs ` ( M x. N ) ) )
Theorem	lcmdvds 12776	The lcm of two integers divides any integer the two divide. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) -> ( M lcm N ) || K ) )
Theorem	lcmid 12777	The lcm of an integer and itself is its absolute value. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M lcm M ) = ( abs ` M ) )
Theorem	lcm1 12778	The lcm of an integer and 1 is the absolute value of the integer. (Contributed by AV, 23-Aug-2020.)
|- ( M e. ZZ -> ( M lcm 1 ) = ( abs ` M ) )
Theorem	lcmgcdnn 12779	The product of two positive integers' least common multiple and greatest common divisor is the product of the two integers. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) x. ( M gcd N ) ) = ( M x. N ) )
Theorem	lcmgcdeq 12780	Two integers' absolute values are equal iff their least common multiple and greatest common divisor are equal. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M lcm N ) = ( M gcd N ) <-> ( abs ` M ) = ( abs ` N ) ) )
Theorem	lcmdvdsb 12781	Biconditional form of lcmdvds 12776. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) <-> ( M lcm N ) || K ) )
Theorem	lcmass 12782	Associative law for lcm operator. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)
|- ( ( N e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ P e. ZZ ) -> ( ( N lcm M ) lcm P ) = ( N lcm ( M lcm P ) ) )
Theorem	3lcm2e6woprm 12783	The least common multiple of three and two is six. This proof does not use the property of 2 and 3 being prime. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( 3 lcm 2 ) = 6
Theorem	6lcm4e12 12784	The least common multiple of six and four is twelve. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2020.)
|- ( 6 lcm 4 ) = ; 1 2
5.1.11  Coprimality and Euclid's lemma According to Wikipedia "Coprime integers", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprime_integers (16-Aug-2020) "[...] two integers a and b are said to be relatively prime, mutually prime, or coprime [...] if the only positive integer (factor) that divides both of them is 1. Consequently, any prime number that divides one does not divide the other. This is equivalent to their greatest common divisor (gcd) being 1.". In the following, we use this equivalent characterization to say that A e. ZZ and B e. ZZ are coprime (or relatively prime) if ( A gcd B ) = 1. The equivalence of the definitions is shown by coprmgcdb 12785. The negation, i.e. two integers are not coprime, can be expressed either by ( A gcd B ) =/= 1, see ncoprmgcdne1b 12786, or equivalently by 1 < ( A gcd B ), see ncoprmgcdgt1b 12787. A proof of Euclid's lemma based on coprimality is provided in coprmdvds 12789 (as opposed to Euclid's lemma for primes).
Theorem	coprmgcdb 12785*	Two positive integers are coprime, i.e. the only positive integer that divides both of them is 1, iff their greatest common divisor is 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( A. i e. NN ( ( i || A /\ i || B ) -> i = 1 ) <-> ( A gcd B ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	ncoprmgcdne1b 12786*	Two positive integers are not coprime, i.e. there is an integer greater than 1 which divides both integers, iff their greatest common divisor is not 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( E. i e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ( i || A /\ i || B ) <-> ( A gcd B ) =/= 1 ) )
Theorem	ncoprmgcdgt1b 12787*	Two positive integers are not coprime, i.e. there is an integer greater than 1 which divides both integers, iff their greatest common divisor is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. NN /\ B e. NN ) -> ( E. i e. ( ZZ>= ` 2 ) ( i || A /\ i || B ) <-> 1 < ( A gcd B ) ) )
Theorem	coprmdvds1 12788	If two positive integers are coprime, i.e. their greatest common divisor is 1, the only positive integer that divides both of them is 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( F e. NN /\ G e. NN /\ ( F gcd G ) = 1 ) -> ( ( I e. NN /\ I || F /\ I || G ) -> I = 1 ) )
Theorem	coprmdvds 12789	Euclid's Lemma (see ProofWiki "Euclid's Lemma", 10-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Euclid's_Lemma): If an integer divides the product of two integers and is coprime to one of them, then it divides the other. See also theorem 1.5 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( K || ( M x. N ) /\ ( K gcd M ) = 1 ) -> K || N ) )
Theorem	coprmdvds2 12790	If an integer is divisible by two coprime integers, then it is divisible by their product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ /\ K e. ZZ ) /\ ( M gcd N ) = 1 ) -> ( ( M || K /\ N || K ) -> ( M x. N ) || K ) )
Theorem	mulgcddvds 12791	One half of rpmulgcd2 12792, which does not need the coprimality assumption. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( K gcd ( M x. N ) ) || ( ( K gcd M ) x. ( K gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	rpmulgcd2 12792	If M is relatively prime to N, then the GCD of K with M x. N is the product of the GCDs with M and N respectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.)
|- ( ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ ( M gcd N ) = 1 ) -> ( K gcd ( M x. N ) ) = ( ( K gcd M ) x. ( K gcd N ) ) )
Theorem	qredeq 12793	Two equal reduced fractions have the same numerator and denominator. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Sep-2013.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. NN /\ ( M gcd N ) = 1 ) /\ ( P e. ZZ /\ Q e. NN /\ ( P gcd Q ) = 1 ) /\ ( M / N ) = ( P / Q ) ) -> ( M = P /\ N = Q ) )
Theorem	qredeu 12794*	Every rational number has a unique reduced form. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. QQ -> E! x e. ( ZZ X. NN ) ( ( ( 1st ` x ) gcd ( 2nd ` x ) ) = 1 /\ A = ( ( 1st ` x ) / ( 2nd ` x ) ) ) )
Theorem	rpmul 12795	If K is relatively prime to M and to N, it is also relatively prime to their product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.)
|- ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( ( K gcd M ) = 1 /\ ( K gcd N ) = 1 ) -> ( K gcd ( M x. N ) ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	rpdvds 12796	If K is relatively prime to N then it is also relatively prime to any divisor M of N. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( ( K e. ZZ /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) /\ ( ( K gcd N ) = 1 /\ M || N ) ) -> ( K gcd M ) = 1 )
5.1.12  Cancellability of congruences
Theorem	congr 12797*	Definition of congruence by integer multiple (see ProofWiki "Congruence (Number Theory)", 11-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition:Congruence_(Number_Theory)): An integer A is congruent to an integer B modulo M if their difference is a multiple of M. See also the definition in [ApostolNT] p. 104: "... a is congruent to b modulo m, and we write a == b (mod m) if m divides the difference a - b", or Wikipedia "Modular arithmetic - Congruence", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_arithmetic#Congruence, 11-Jul-2021,: "Given an integer n > 1, called a modulus, two integers are said to be congruent modulo n, if n is a divisor of their difference (i.e., if there is an integer k such that a-b = kn)". (Contributed by AV, 11-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ M e. NN ) -> ( ( A mod M ) = ( B mod M ) <-> E. n e. ZZ ( n x. M ) = ( A - B ) ) )
Theorem	divgcdcoprm0 12798	Integers divided by gcd are coprime. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ B =/= 0 ) -> ( ( A / ( A gcd B ) ) gcd ( B / ( A gcd B ) ) ) = 1 )
Theorem	divgcdcoprmex 12799*	Integers divided by gcd are coprime (see ProofWiki "Integers Divided by GCD are Coprime", 11-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Integers_Divided_by_GCD_are_Coprime): Any pair of integers, not both zero, can be reduced to a pair of coprime ones by dividing them by their gcd. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ ( B e. ZZ /\ B =/= 0 ) /\ M = ( A gcd B ) ) -> E. a e. ZZ E. b e. ZZ ( A = ( M x. a ) /\ B = ( M x. b ) /\ ( a gcd b ) = 1 ) )
Theorem	cncongr1 12800	One direction of the bicondition in cncongr 12802. Theorem 5.4 in [ApostolNT] p. 109. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A e. ZZ /\ B e. ZZ /\ C e. ZZ ) /\ ( N e. NN /\ M = ( N / ( C gcd N ) ) ) ) -> ( ( ( A x. C ) mod N ) = ( ( B x. C ) mod N ) -> ( A mod M ) = ( B mod M ) ) )