P. 128 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 12701-12800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	djurclALT 12701	Shortening of djurcl 6889 using djucllem 12699. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Jul-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( C e. B -> ( (inr |` B ) ` C ) e. ( A ⊔ B ) )
10.2.6  Constructive Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (CZF): Bounded formulas and classes This section develops constructive Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (CZF) on top of intuitionistic logic. It is a constructive theory in the sense that its logic is intuitionistic and it is predicative. "Predicative" means that new sets can be constructed only from already constructed sets. In particular, the axiom of separation ax-sep 4006 is not predicative (because we cannot allow all formulas to define a subset) and is replaced in CZF by bounded separation ax-bdsep 12774. Because this axiom is weaker than full separation, the axiom of replacement or collection ax-coll 4003 of ZF and IZF has to be strengthened in CZF to the axiom of strong collection ax-strcoll 12872 (which is a theorem of IZF), and the axiom of infinity needs a more precise version, the von Neumann axiom of infinity ax-infvn 12831. Similarly, the axiom of powerset ax-pow 4058 is not predicative (checking whether a set is included in another requires to universally quantifier over that "not yet constructed" set) and is replaced in CZF by the axiom of fullness or the axiom of subset collection ax-sscoll 12877. In an intuitionistic context, the axiom of regularity is stated in IZF as well as in CZF as the axiom of set induction ax-setind 4412. It is sometimes interesting to study the weakening of CZF where that axiom is replaced by bounded set induction ax-bdsetind 12858. For more details on CZF, a useful set of notes is Peter Aczel and Michael Rathjen, CST Book draft. (available at http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~rathjen/book.pdf 12858) and an interesting article is Michael Shulman, Comparing material and structural set theories, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Volume 170, Issue 4 (Apr. 2019), 465--504. (available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05204 12858) I also thank Michael Rathjen and Michael Shulman for useful hints in the formulation of some results.
10.2.6.1  Bounded formulas The present definition of bounded formulas emerged from a discussion on GitHub between Jim Kingdon, Mario Carneiro and I, started 23-Sept-2019 (see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/1173 and links therein). In order to state certain axiom schemes of Constructive Zermelo–Fraenkel (CZF) set theory, like the axiom scheme of bounded (or restricted, or Δ0) separation, it is necessary to distinguish certain formulas, called bounded (or restricted, or Δ0) formulas. The necessity of considering bounded formulas also arises in several theories of bounded arithmetic, both classical or intuitonistic, for instance to state the axiom scheme of Δ0-induction. To formalize this in Metamath, there are several choices to make. A first choice is to either create a new type for bounded formulas, or to create a predicate on formulas that indicates whether they are bounded. In the first case, one creates a new type "wff0" with a new set of metavariables (ph0 ...) and an axiom "$a wff ph0 " ensuring that bounded formulas are formulas, so that one can reuse existing theorems, and then axioms take the form "$a wff0 ( ph0 -> ps0 )", etc. In the second case, one introduces a predicate "BOUNDED " with the intended meaning that "BOUNDED ph " is a formula meaning that ph is a bounded formula. We choose the second option, since the first would complicate the grammar, risking to make it ambiguous. (TODO: elaborate.) A second choice is to view "bounded" either as a syntactic or a semantic property. For instance, A. x T. is not syntactically bounded since it has an unbounded universal quantifier, but it is semantically bounded since it is equivalent to T. which is bounded. We choose the second option, so that formulas using defined symbols can be proved bounded. A third choice is in the form of the axioms, either in closed form or in inference form. One cannot state all the axioms in closed form, especially ax-bd0 12703. Indeed, if we posited it in closed form, then we could prove for instance |- ( ph -> BOUNDED ph ) and |- ( -. ph -> BOUNDED ph ) which is problematic (with the law of excluded middle, this would entail that all formulas are bounded, but even without it, too many formulas could be proved bounded...). (TODO: elaborate.) Having ax-bd0 12703 in inference form ensures that a formula can be proved bounded only if it is equivalent *for all values of the free variables* to a syntactically bounded one. The other axioms (ax-bdim 12704 through ax-bdsb 12712) can be written either in closed or inference form. The fact that ax-bd0 12703 is an inference is enough to ensure that the closed forms cannot be "exploited" to prove that some unbounded formulas are bounded. (TODO: check.) However, we state all the axioms in inference form to make it clear that we do not exploit any over-permissiveness. Finally, note that our logic has no terms, only variables. Therefore, we cannot prove for instance that x e. om is a bounded formula. However, since om can be defined as "the y such that PHI" a proof using the fact that x e. om is bounded can be converted to a proof in iset.mm by replacing om with y everywhere and prepending the antecedent PHI, since x e. y is bounded by ax-bdel 12711. For a similar method, see bj-omtrans 12846. Note that one cannot add an axiom |- BOUNDED x e. A since by bdph 12740 it would imply that every formula is bounded.
Syntax	wbd 12702	Syntax for the predicate BOUNDED.
wff BOUNDED ph
Axiom	ax-bd0 12703	If two formulas are equivalent, then boundedness of one implies boundedness of the other. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- (BOUNDED ph -> BOUNDED ps )
Axiom	ax-bdim 12704	An implication between two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- BOUNDED ps   =>    |- BOUNDED ( ph -> ps )
Axiom	ax-bdan 12705	The conjunction of two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- BOUNDED ps   =>    |- BOUNDED ( ph /\ ps )
Axiom	ax-bdor 12706	The disjunction of two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- BOUNDED ps   =>    |- BOUNDED ( ph \/ ps )
Axiom	ax-bdn 12707	The negation of a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED -. ph
Axiom	ax-bdal 12708*	A bounded universal quantification of a bounded formula is bounded. Note the disjoint variable condition on x , y. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED A. x e. y ph
Axiom	ax-bdex 12709*	A bounded existential quantification of a bounded formula is bounded. Note the disjoint variable condition on x , y. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Sep-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED E. x e. y ph
Axiom	ax-bdeq 12710	An atomic formula is bounded (equality predicate). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED x = y
Axiom	ax-bdel 12711	An atomic formula is bounded (membership predicate). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED x e. y
Axiom	ax-bdsb 12712	A formula resulting from proper substitution in a bounded formula is bounded. This probably cannot be proved from the other axioms, since neither the definiens in df-sb 1719, nor probably any other equivalent formula, is syntactically bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	bdeq 12713	Equality property for the predicate BOUNDED. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- (BOUNDED ph <-> BOUNDED ps )
Theorem	bd0 12714	A formula equivalent to a bounded one is bounded. See also bd0r 12715. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- BOUNDED ps
Theorem	bd0r 12715	A formula equivalent to a bounded one is bounded. Stated with a commuted (compared with bd0 12714) biconditional in the hypothesis, to work better with definitions ( ps is the definiendum that one wants to prove bounded). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- ( ps <-> ph )   =>    |- BOUNDED ps
Theorem	bdbi 12716	A biconditional between two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- BOUNDED ps   =>    |- BOUNDED ( ph <-> ps )
Theorem	bdstab 12717	Stability of a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED STAB ph
Theorem	bddc 12718	Decidability of a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED DECID ph
Theorem	bd3or 12719	A disjunction of three bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- BOUNDED ps   &    |- BOUNDED ch   =>    |- BOUNDED ( ph \/ ps \/ ch )
Theorem	bd3an 12720	A conjunction of three bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- BOUNDED ps   &    |- BOUNDED ch   =>    |- BOUNDED ( ph /\ ps /\ ch )
Theorem	bdth 12721	A truth (a (closed) theorem) is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
|- ph   =>    |- BOUNDED ph
Theorem	bdtru 12722	The truth value T. is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED T.
Theorem	bdfal 12723	The truth value F. is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED F.
Theorem	bdnth 12724	A falsity is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
|- -. ph   =>    |- BOUNDED ph
Theorem	bdnthALT 12725	Alternate proof of bdnth 12724 not using bdfal 12723. Then, bdfal 12723 can be proved from this theorem, using fal 1321. The total number of proof steps would be 17 (for bdnthALT 12725) + 3 = 20, which is more than 8 (for bdfal 12723) + 9 (for bdnth 12724) = 17. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- -. ph   =>    |- BOUNDED ph
Theorem	bdxor 12726	The exclusive disjunction of two bounded formulas is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- BOUNDED ps   =>    |- BOUNDED ( ph \/_ ps )
Theorem	bj-bdcel 12727*	Boundedness of a membership formula. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.)
|- BOUNDED y = A   =>    |- BOUNDED A e. x
Theorem	bdab 12728	Membership in a class defined by class abstraction using a bounded formula, is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED x e. { y | ph }
Theorem	bdcdeq 12729	Conditional equality of a bounded formula is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED CondEq ( x = y -> ph )
10.2.6.2  Bounded classes In line with our definitions of classes as extensions of predicates, it is useful to define a predicate for bounded classes, which is done in df-bdc 12731. Note that this notion is only a technical device which can be used to shorten proofs of (semantic) boundedness of formulas. As will be clear by the end of this subsection (see for instance bdop 12765), one can prove the boundedness of any concrete term using only setvars and bounded formulas, for instance, |- BOUNDED ph => |- BOUNDED <. { x | ph } , ( { y , suc z } X. <. t , (/) >. ) >.. The proofs are long since one has to prove boundedness at each step of the construction, without being able to prove general theorems like |- BOUNDED A => |- BOUNDED { A }.
Syntax	wbdc 12730	Syntax for the predicate BOUNDED.
wff BOUNDED A
Definition	df-bdc 12731*	Define a bounded class as one such that membership in this class is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- (BOUNDED A <-> A. xBOUNDED x e. A )
Theorem	bdceq 12732	Equality property for the predicate BOUNDED. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- A = B   =>    |- (BOUNDED A <-> BOUNDED B )
Theorem	bdceqi 12733	A class equal to a bounded one is bounded. Note the use of ax-ext 2097. See also bdceqir 12734. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- A = B   =>    |- BOUNDED B
Theorem	bdceqir 12734	A class equal to a bounded one is bounded. Stated with a commuted (compared with bdceqi 12733) equality in the hypothesis, to work better with definitions ( B is the definiendum that one wants to prove bounded; see comment of bd0r 12715). (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- B = A   =>    |- BOUNDED B
Theorem	bdel 12735*	The belonging of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- (BOUNDED A -> BOUNDED x e. A )
Theorem	bdeli 12736*	Inference associated with bdel 12735. Its converse is bdelir 12737. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- BOUNDED x e. A
Theorem	bdelir 12737*	Inference associated with df-bdc 12731. Its converse is bdeli 12736. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED x e. A   =>    |- BOUNDED A
Theorem	bdcv 12738	A setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED x
Theorem	bdcab 12739	A class defined by class abstraction using a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED { x | ph }
Theorem	bdph 12740	A formula which defines (by class abstraction) a bounded class is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED { x | ph }   =>    |- BOUNDED ph
Theorem	bds 12741*	Boundedness of a formula resulting from implicit substitution in a bounded formula. Note that the proof does not use ax-bdsb 12712; therefore, using implicit instead of explicit substitution when boundedness is important, one might avoid using ax-bdsb 12712. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- BOUNDED ps
Theorem	bdcrab 12742*	A class defined by restricted abstraction from a bounded class and a bounded formula is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED { x e. A | ph }
Theorem	bdne 12743	Inequality of two setvars is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED x =/= y
Theorem	bdnel 12744*	Non-membership of a setvar in a bounded formula is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- BOUNDED x e/ A
Theorem	bdreu 12745*	Boundedness of existential uniqueness. Remark regarding restricted quantifiers: the formula A. x e. A ph need not be bounded even if A and ph are. Indeed, _V is bounded by bdcvv 12747, and |- ( A. x e. _V ph <-> A. x ph ) (in minimal propositional calculus), so by bd0 12714, if A. x e. _V ph were bounded when ph is bounded, then A. x ph would be bounded as well when ph is bounded, which is not the case. The same remark holds with E. , E! , E*. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED E! x e. y ph
Theorem	bdrmo 12746*	Boundedness of existential at-most-one. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED E* x e. y ph
Theorem	bdcvv 12747	The universal class is bounded. The formulation may sound strange, but recall that here, "bounded" means "Δ0". (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED _V
Theorem	bdsbc 12748	A formula resulting from proper substitution of a setvar for a setvar in a bounded formula is bounded. See also bdsbcALT 12749. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED [. y / x ]. ph
Theorem	bdsbcALT 12749	Alternate proof of bdsbc 12748. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- BOUNDED [. y / x ]. ph
Theorem	bdccsb 12750	A class resulting from proper substitution of a setvar for a setvar in a bounded class is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- BOUNDED [_ y / x ]_ A
Theorem	bdcdif 12751	The difference of two bounded classes is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- BOUNDED B   =>    |- BOUNDED ( A \ B )
Theorem	bdcun 12752	The union of two bounded classes is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- BOUNDED B   =>    |- BOUNDED ( A u. B )
Theorem	bdcin 12753	The intersection of two bounded classes is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- BOUNDED B   =>    |- BOUNDED ( A i^i B )
Theorem	bdss 12754	The inclusion of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. Note: apparently, we cannot prove from the present axioms that equality of two bounded classes is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- BOUNDED x C_ A
Theorem	bdcnul 12755	The empty class is bounded. See also bdcnulALT 12756. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED (/)
Theorem	bdcnulALT 12756	Alternate proof of bdcnul 12755. Similarly, for the next few theorems proving boundedness of a class, one can either use their definition followed by bdceqir 12734, or use the corresponding characterizations of its elements followed by bdelir 12737. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED (/)
Theorem	bdeq0 12757	Boundedness of the formula expressing that a setvar is equal to the empty class. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED x = (/)
Theorem	bj-bd0el 12758	Boundedness of the formula "the empty set belongs to the setvar x". (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED (/) e. x
Theorem	bdcpw 12759	The power class of a bounded class is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- BOUNDED ~P A
Theorem	bdcsn 12760	The singleton of a setvar is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED { x }
Theorem	bdcpr 12761	The pair of two setvars is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED { x , y }
Theorem	bdctp 12762	The unordered triple of three setvars is bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED { x , y , z }
Theorem	bdsnss 12763*	Inclusion of a singleton of a setvar in a bounded class is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- BOUNDED { x } C_ A
Theorem	bdvsn 12764*	Equality of a setvar with a singleton of a setvar is a bounded formula. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED x = { y }
Theorem	bdop 12765	The ordered pair of two setvars is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED <. x , y >.
Theorem	bdcuni 12766	The union of a setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED U. x
Theorem	bdcint 12767	The intersection of a setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED |^| x
Theorem	bdciun 12768*	The indexed union of a bounded class with a setvar indexing set is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- BOUNDED U_ x e. y A
Theorem	bdciin 12769*	The indexed intersection of a bounded class with a setvar indexing set is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- BOUNDED |^|_ x e. y A
Theorem	bdcsuc 12770	The successor of a setvar is a bounded class. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED suc x
Theorem	bdeqsuc 12771*	Boundedness of the formula expressing that a setvar is equal to the successor of another. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED x = suc y
Theorem	bj-bdsucel 12772	Boundedness of the formula "the successor of the setvar x belongs to the setvar y". (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED suc x e. y
Theorem	bdcriota 12773*	A class given by a restricted definition binder is bounded, under the given hypotheses. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- E! x e. y ph   =>    |- BOUNDED ( iota_ x e. y ph )
10.2.7  CZF: Bounded separation In this section, we state the axiom scheme of bounded separation, which is part of CZF set theory.
Axiom	ax-bdsep 12774*	Axiom scheme of bounded (or restricted, or Δ0) separation. It is stated with all possible disjoint variable conditions, to show that this weak form is sufficient. For the full axiom of separation, see ax-sep 4006. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- A. a E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )
Theorem	bdsep1 12775*	Version of ax-bdsep 12774 without initial universal quantifier. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )
Theorem	bdsep2 12776*	Version of ax-bdsep 12774 with one disjoint variable condition removed and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 12775 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )
Theorem	bdsepnft 12777*	Closed form of bdsepnf 12778. Version of ax-bdsep 12774 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a non-freeness antecedent, and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 12775 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Oct-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- ( A. x F/ b ph -> E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) ) )
Theorem	bdsepnf 12778*	Version of ax-bdsep 12774 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a non-freeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. See also bdsepnfALT 12779. Use bdsep1 12775 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- F/ b ph   &    |- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )
Theorem	bdsepnfALT 12779*	Alternate proof of bdsepnf 12778, not using bdsepnft 12777. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- F/ b ph   &    |- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )
Theorem	bdzfauscl 12780*	Closed form of the version of zfauscl 4008 for bounded formulas using bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- ( A e. V -> E. y A. x ( x e. y <-> ( x e. A /\ ph ) ) )
Theorem	bdbm1.3ii 12781*	Bounded version of bm1.3ii 4009. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- E. x A. y ( ph -> y e. x )   =>    |- E. x A. y ( y e. x <-> ph )
Theorem	bj-axemptylem 12782*	Lemma for bj-axempty 12783 and bj-axempty2 12784. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-nul 4014 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- E. x A. y ( y e. x -> F. )
Theorem	bj-axempty 12783*	Axiom of the empty set from bounded separation. It is provable from bounded separation since the intuitionistic FOL used in iset.mm assumes a nonempty universe. See axnul 4013. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-nul 4014 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- E. x A. y e. x F.
Theorem	bj-axempty2 12784*	Axiom of the empty set from bounded separation, alternate version to bj-axempty 12783. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-nul 4014 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- E. x A. y -. y e. x
Theorem	bj-nalset 12785*	nalset 4018 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- -. E. x A. y y e. x
Theorem	bj-vprc 12786	vprc 4020 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- -. _V e. _V
Theorem	bj-nvel 12787	nvel 4021 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- -. _V e. A
Theorem	bj-vnex 12788	vnex 4019 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- -. E. x x = _V
Theorem	bdinex1 12789	Bounded version of inex1 4022. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED B   &    |- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A i^i B ) e. _V
Theorem	bdinex2 12790	Bounded version of inex2 4023. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED B   &    |- A e. _V   =>    |- ( B i^i A ) e. _V
Theorem	bdinex1g 12791	Bounded version of inex1g 4024. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED B   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A i^i B ) e. _V )
Theorem	bdssex 12792	Bounded version of ssex 4025. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A C_ B -> A e. _V )
Theorem	bdssexi 12793	Bounded version of ssexi 4026. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- A C_ B   =>    |- A e. _V
Theorem	bdssexg 12794	Bounded version of ssexg 4027. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( ( A C_ B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	bdssexd 12795	Bounded version of ssexd 4028. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ph -> B e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ B )   &    |- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. _V )
Theorem	bdrabexg 12796*	Bounded version of rabexg 4031. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( A e. V -> { x e. A | ph } e. _V )
Theorem	bj-inex 12797	The intersection of two sets is a set, from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A i^i B ) e. _V )
Theorem	bj-intexr 12798	intexr 4035 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( |^| A e. _V -> A =/= (/) )
Theorem	bj-intnexr 12799	intnexr 4036 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( |^| A = _V -> -. |^| A e. _V )
Theorem	bj-zfpair2 12800	Proof of zfpair2 4092 using only bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- { x , y } e. _V