P. 53 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 5201-5300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	dfdm2 5201	Alternate definition of domain df-dm 4670 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2010.)
|- dom A = U. U. ( `' A o. A )
Theorem	unixpm 5202*	The double class union of an inhabited cross product is the union of its members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E. x x e. ( A X. B ) -> U. U. ( A X. B ) = ( A u. B ) )
Theorem	unixp0im 5203	The union of an empty cross product is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ( A X. B ) = (/) -> U. ( A X. B ) = (/) )
Theorem	cnvexg 5204	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.)
|- ( A e. V -> `' A e. _V )
Theorem	cnvex 5205	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- `' A e. _V
Theorem	relcnvexb 5206	A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.)
|- ( Rel R -> ( R e. _V <-> `' R e. _V ) )
Theorem	ressn 5207	Restriction of a class to a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
|- ( A |` { B } ) = ( { B } X. ( A " { B } ) )
Theorem	cnviinm 5208*	The converse of an intersection is the intersection of the converse. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E. y y e. A -> `' |^|_ x e. A B = |^|_ x e. A `' B )
Theorem	cnvpom 5209*	The converse of a partial order relation is a partial order relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> ( R Po A <-> `' R Po A ) )
Theorem	cnvsom 5210*	The converse of a strict order relation is a strict order relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> ( R Or A <-> `' R Or A ) )
Theorem	coexg 5211	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A o. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	coex 5212	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A o. B ) e. _V
Theorem	xpcom 5213*	Composition of two cross products. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E. x x e. B -> ( ( B X. C ) o. ( A X. B ) ) = ( A X. C ) )
2.6.7  Definite description binder (inverted iota)
Syntax	cio 5214	Extend class notation with Russell's definition description binder (inverted iota).
class ( iota x ph )
Theorem	iotajust 5215*	Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 5216. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- U. { y | { x | ph } = { y } } = U. { z | { x | ph } = { z } }
Definition	df-iota 5216*	Define Russell's definition description binder, which can be read as "the unique x such that ph," where ph ordinarily contains x as a free variable. Our definition is meaningful only when there is exactly one x such that ph is true (see iotaval 5227); otherwise, it evaluates to the empty set (see iotanul 5231). Russell used the inverted iota symbol iota to represent the binder. Sometimes proofs need to expand an iota-based definition. That is, given "X = the x for which ... x ... x ..." holds, the proof needs to get to "... X ... X ...". A general strategy to do this is to use iotacl 5240 (for unbounded iota). This can be easier than applying a version that applies an explicit substitution, because substituting an iota into its own property always has a bound variable clash which must be first renamed or else guarded with NF. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
|- ( iota x ph ) = U. { y | { x | ph } = { y } }
Theorem	dfiota2 5217*	Alternate definition for descriptions. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
|- ( iota x ph ) = U. { y | A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) }
Theorem	nfiota1 5218	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the iota class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x ( iota x ph )
Theorem	nfiotadw 5219*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the iota class. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x ( iota y ps ) )
Theorem	nfiotaw 5220*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the iota class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/_ x ( iota y ph )
Theorem	cbviota 5221	Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y ps )
Theorem	cbviotav 5222*	Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y ps )
Theorem	sb8iota 5223	Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 2055. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	iotaeq 5224	Equality theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y ph ) )
Theorem	iotabi 5225	Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( iota x ph ) = ( iota x ps ) )
Theorem	uniabio 5226*	Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) -> U. { x | ph } = y )
Theorem	iotaval 5227*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) -> ( iota x ph ) = y )
Theorem	iotauni 5228	Equivalence between two different forms of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) = U. { x | ph } )
Theorem	iotaint 5229	Equivalence between two different forms of iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) = |^| { x | ph } )
Theorem	iota1 5230	Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( ph <-> ( iota x ph ) = x ) )
Theorem	iotanul 5231	Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one x that satisfies ph. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( -. E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) = (/) )
Theorem	euiotaex 5232	Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the iota class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) e. _V )
Theorem	iotass 5233*	Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
|- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> ( iota x ph ) C_ A )
Theorem	iotaexab 5234	Existence of the iota class when all the possible values are contained in a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2025.)
|- ( { x | ph } e. V -> ( iota x ph ) e. _V )
Theorem	iota4 5235	Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
|- ( E! x ph -> [. ( iota x ph ) / x ]. ph )
Theorem	iota4an 5236	Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
|- ( E! x ( ph /\ ps ) -> [. ( iota x ( ph /\ ps ) ) / x ]. ph )
Theorem	iota5 5237*	A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
|- ( ( ph /\ A e. V ) -> ( ps <-> x = A ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ A e. V ) -> ( iota x ps ) = A )
Theorem	iotabidv 5238*	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( iota x ps ) = ( iota x ch ) )
Theorem	iotabii 5239	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota x ps )
Theorem	iotacl 5240	Membership law for descriptions. This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 5216). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) e. { x | ph } )
Theorem	iota2df 5241	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that ph " with a class expression A. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> B e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> E! x ps )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = B ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ch <-> ( iota x ps ) = B ) )
Theorem	iota2d 5242*	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that ph " with a class expression A. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> B e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> E! x ps )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = B ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ch <-> ( iota x ps ) = B ) )
Theorem	eliota 5243*	An element of an iota expression. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.)
|- ( A e. ( iota x ph ) <-> E. y ( A e. y /\ A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) ) )
Theorem	eliotaeu 5244	An inhabited iota expression has a unique value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.)
|- ( A e. ( iota x ph ) -> E! x ph )
Theorem	iota2 5245*	The unique element such that ph. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ E! x ph ) -> ( ps <-> ( iota x ph ) = A ) )
Theorem	sniota 5246	A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph -> { x | ph } = { ( iota x ph ) } )
Theorem	iotam 5247*	Representation of "the unique element such that ph " with a class expression A which is inhabited (that means that "the unique element such that ph " exists). (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ E. w w e. A /\ A = ( iota x ph ) ) -> ps )
Theorem	csbiotag 5248*	Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
|- ( A e. V -> [_ A / x ]_ ( iota y ph ) = ( iota y [. A / x ]. ph ) )
2.6.8  Functions
Syntax	wfun 5249	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: A is a function.)
wff Fun A
Syntax	wfn 5250	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: A is a function on B.)
wff A Fn B
Syntax	wf 5251	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: F maps A into B.)
wff F : A --> B
Syntax	wf1 5252	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: F maps A one-to-one into B.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff F : A -1-1-> B
Syntax	wfo 5253	Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: F maps A onto B.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff F : A -onto-> B
Syntax	wf1o 5254	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: F maps A one-to-one onto B.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff F : A -1-1-onto-> B
Syntax	cfv 5255	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. (Read: The value of F at A, or " F of A.")
class ( F ` A )
Syntax	wiso 5256	Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. (Read: H is an R, S isomorphism of A onto B.)
wff H Isom R , S ( A , B )
Definition	df-fun 5257	Define predicate that determines if some class A is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun _I is true (funi 5287). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 4091 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 4093). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 5258), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 5259), a one-to-one function (df-f1 5260), an onto function (df-fo 5261), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 5262). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 5265, dffun4 5266, dffun6 5269, dffun7 5282, dffun8 5283, and dffun9 5284. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ ( A o. `' A ) C_ _I ) )
Definition	df-fn 5258	Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A Fn B <-> ( Fun A /\ dom A = B ) )
Definition	df-f 5259	Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( F : A --> B <-> ( F Fn A /\ ran F C_ B ) )
Definition	df-f1 5260	Define a one-to-one function. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( F : A -1-1-> B <-> ( F : A --> B /\ Fun `' F ) )
Definition	df-fo 5261	Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( F : A -onto-> B <-> ( F Fn A /\ ran F = B ) )
Definition	df-f1o 5262	Define a one-to-one onto function. Compare Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B <-> ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ F : A -onto-> B ) )
Definition	df-fv 5263*	Define the value of a function, ( F ` A ), also known as function application. For example, ( _I ` (/) ) = (/). Typically, function F is defined using maps-to notation (see df-mpt 4093), but this is not required. For example, F = { <. 2 , 6 >. , <. 3 , 9 >. } -> ( F ` 3 ) = 9. We will later define two-argument functions using ordered pairs as ( A F B ) = ( F ` <. A , B >. ). This particular definition is quite convenient: it can be applied to any class and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful. The left apostrophe notation originated with Peano and was adopted in Definition *30.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 235, Definition 10.11 of [Quine] p. 68, and Definition 6.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. It means the same thing as the more familiar F ( A ) notation for a function's value at A, i.e., " F of A," but without context-dependent notational ambiguity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) Revised to use iota. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
|- ( F ` A ) = ( iota x A F x )
Definition	df-isom 5264*	Define the isomorphism predicate. We read this as " H is an R, S isomorphism of A onto B". Normally, R and S are ordering relations on A and B respectively. Definition 6.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32, whose notation is the same as ours except that R and S are subscripts. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
|- ( H Isom R , S ( A , B ) <-> ( H : A -1-1-onto-> B /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y <-> ( H ` x ) S ( H ` y ) ) ) )
Theorem	dffun2 5265*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
|- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x A. y A. z ( ( x A y /\ x A z ) -> y = z ) ) )
Theorem	dffun4 5266*	Alternate definition of a function. Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
|- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x A. y A. z ( ( <. x , y >. e. A /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) -> y = z ) ) )
Theorem	dffun5r 5267*	A way of proving a relation is a function, analogous to mo2r 2094. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2020.)
|- ( ( Rel A /\ A. x E. z A. y ( <. x , y >. e. A -> y = z ) ) -> Fun A )
Theorem	dffun6f 5268*	Definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   =>    |- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x E* y x A y ) )
Theorem	dffun6 5269*	Alternate definition of a function using "at most one" notation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.)
|- ( Fun F <-> ( Rel F /\ A. x E* y x F y ) )
Theorem	funmo 5270*	A function has at most one value for each argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.)
|- ( Fun F -> E* y A F y )
Theorem	dffun4f 5271*	Definition of function like dffun4 5266 but using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Mar-2019.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ z A   =>    |- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x A. y A. z ( ( <. x , y >. e. A /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) -> y = z ) ) )
Theorem	funrel 5272	A function is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Fun A -> Rel A )
Theorem	0nelfun 5273	A function does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Nov-2021.)
|- ( Fun R -> (/) e/ R )
Theorem	funss 5274	Subclass theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
|- ( A C_ B -> ( Fun B -> Fun A ) )
Theorem	funeq 5275	Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Fun A <-> Fun B ) )
Theorem	funeqi 5276	Equality inference for the function predicate. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( Fun A <-> Fun B )
Theorem	funeqd 5277	Equality deduction for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2013.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( Fun A <-> Fun B ) )
Theorem	nffun 5278	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a function. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.)
|- F/_ x F   =>    |- F/ x Fun F
Theorem	sbcfung 5279	Distribute proper substitution through the function predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. Fun F <-> Fun [_ A / x ]_ F ) )
Theorem	funeu 5280*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
|- ( ( Fun F /\ A F B ) -> E! y A F y )
Theorem	funeu2 5281*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.)
|- ( ( Fun F /\ <. A , B >. e. F ) -> E! y <. A , y >. e. F )
Theorem	dffun7 5282*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. (Enderton's definition is ambiguous because "there is only one" could mean either "there is at most one" or "there is exactly one". However, dffun8 5283 shows that it does not matter which meaning we pick.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
|- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x e. dom A E* y x A y ) )
Theorem	dffun8 5283*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. Compare dffun7 5282. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
|- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x e. dom A E! y x A y ) )
Theorem	dffun9 5284*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x e. dom A E* y e. ran A x A y ) )
Theorem	funfn 5285	An equivalence for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
|- ( Fun A <-> A Fn dom A )
Theorem	funfnd 5286	A function is a function over its domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
|- ( ph -> Fun A )   =>    |- ( ph -> A Fn dom A )
Theorem	funi 5287	The identity relation is a function. Part of Theorem 10.4 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
|- Fun _I
Theorem	nfunv 5288	The universe is not a function. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 27-Jan-2004.)
|- -. Fun _V
Theorem	funopg 5289	A Kuratowski ordered pair is a function only if its components are equal. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ Fun <. A , B >. ) -> A = B )
Theorem	funopab 5290*	A class of ordered pairs is a function when there is at most one second member for each pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.)
|- ( Fun { <. x , y >. | ph } <-> A. x E* y ph )
Theorem	funopabeq 5291*	A class of ordered pairs of values is a function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
|- Fun { <. x , y >. | y = A }
Theorem	funopab4 5292*	A class of ordered pairs of values in the form used by df-mpt 4093 is a function. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.)
|- Fun { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ y = A ) }
Theorem	funmpt 5293	A function in maps-to notation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
|- Fun ( x e. A |-> B )
Theorem	funmpt2 5294	Functionality of a class given by a maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> B )   =>    |- Fun F
Theorem	funco 5295	The composition of two functions is a function. Exercise 29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
|- ( ( Fun F /\ Fun G ) -> Fun ( F o. G ) )
Theorem	funres 5296	A restriction of a function is a function. Compare Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Fun F -> Fun ( F |` A ) )
Theorem	funssres 5297	The restriction of a function to the domain of a subclass equals the subclass. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1994.)
|- ( ( Fun F /\ G C_ F ) -> ( F |` dom G ) = G )
Theorem	fun2ssres 5298	Equality of restrictions of a function and a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
|- ( ( Fun F /\ G C_ F /\ A C_ dom G ) -> ( F |` A ) = ( G |` A ) )
Theorem	funun 5299	The union of functions with disjoint domains is a function. Theorem 4.6 of [Monk1] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
|- ( ( ( Fun F /\ Fun G ) /\ ( dom F i^i dom G ) = (/) ) -> Fun ( F u. G ) )
Theorem	funcnvsn 5300	The converse singleton of an ordered pair is a function. This is equivalent to funsn 5303 via cnvsn 5149, but stating it this way allows us to skip the sethood assumptions on A and B. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2015.)
|- Fun `' { <. A , B >. }