P. 53 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 5201-5300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	coiun 5201*	Composition with an indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
|- ( A o. U_ x e. C B ) = U_ x e. C ( A o. B )
Theorem	cocnvcnv1 5202	A composition is not affected by a double converse of its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|- ( `' `' A o. B ) = ( A o. B )
Theorem	cocnvcnv2 5203	A composition is not affected by a double converse of its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|- ( A o. `' `' B ) = ( A o. B )
Theorem	cores2 5204	Absorption of a reverse (preimage) restriction of the second member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2006.)
|- ( dom A C_ C -> ( A o. `' ( `' B |` C ) ) = ( A o. B ) )
Theorem	co02 5205	Composition with the empty set. Theorem 20 of [Suppes] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A o. (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	co01 5206	Composition with the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|- ( (/) o. A ) = (/)
Theorem	coi1 5207	Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( A o. _I ) = A )
Theorem	coi2 5208	Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( _I o. A ) = A )
Theorem	coires1 5209	Composition with a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by FL, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
|- ( A o. ( _I |` B ) ) = ( A |` B )
Theorem	coass 5210	Associative law for class composition. Theorem 27 of [Suppes] p. 64. Also Exercise 21 of [Enderton] p. 53. Interestingly, this law holds for any classes whatsoever, not just functions or even relations. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.)
|- ( ( A o. B ) o. C ) = ( A o. ( B o. C ) )
Theorem	relcnvtr 5211	A relation is transitive iff its converse is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.)
|- ( Rel R -> ( ( R o. R ) C_ R <-> ( `' R o. `' R ) C_ `' R ) )
Theorem	relssdmrn 5212	A relation is included in the cross product of its domain and range. Exercise 4.12(t) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Rel A -> A C_ ( dom A X. ran A ) )
Theorem	cnvssrndm 5213	The converse is a subset of the cartesian product of range and domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
|- `' A C_ ( ran A X. dom A )
Theorem	cossxp 5214	Composition as a subset of the cross product of factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
|- ( A o. B ) C_ ( dom B X. ran A )
Theorem	cossxp2 5215	The composition of two relations is a relation, with bounds on its domain and codomain. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> R C_ ( A X. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> S C_ ( B X. C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( S o. R ) C_ ( A X. C ) )
Theorem	cocnvres 5216	Restricting a relation and a converse relation when they are composed together. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)
|- ( S o. `' R ) = ( ( S |` dom R ) o. `' ( R |` dom S ) )
Theorem	cocnvss 5217	Upper bound for the composed of a relation and an inverse relation. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)
|- ( S o. `' R ) C_ ( ran ( R |` dom S ) X. ran ( S |` dom R ) )
Theorem	relrelss 5218	Two ways to describe the structure of a two-place operation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.)
|- ( ( Rel A /\ Rel dom A ) <-> A C_ ( ( _V X. _V ) X. _V ) )
Theorem	unielrel 5219	The membership relation for a relation is inherited by class union. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> U. A e. U. R )
Theorem	relfld 5220	The double union of a relation is its field. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( Rel R -> U. U. R = ( dom R u. ran R ) )
Theorem	relresfld 5221	Restriction of a relation to its field. (Contributed by FL, 15-Apr-2012.)
|- ( Rel R -> ( R |` U. U. R ) = R )
Theorem	relcoi2 5222	Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 2-May-2011.)
|- ( Rel R -> ( ( _I |` U. U. R ) o. R ) = R )
Theorem	relcoi1 5223	Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 8-May-2011.)
|- ( Rel R -> ( R o. ( _I |` U. U. R ) ) = R )
Theorem	unidmrn 5224	The double union of the converse of a class is its field. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2008.)
|- U. U. `' A = ( dom A u. ran A )
Theorem	relcnvfld 5225	if R is a relation, its double union equals the double union of its converse. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.)
|- ( Rel R -> U. U. R = U. U. `' R )
Theorem	dfdm2 5226	Alternate definition of domain df-dm 4693 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2010.)
|- dom A = U. U. ( `' A o. A )
Theorem	unixpm 5227*	The double class union of an inhabited cross product is the union of its members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E. x x e. ( A X. B ) -> U. U. ( A X. B ) = ( A u. B ) )
Theorem	unixp0im 5228	The union of an empty cross product is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
|- ( ( A X. B ) = (/) -> U. ( A X. B ) = (/) )
Theorem	cnvexg 5229	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.)
|- ( A e. V -> `' A e. _V )
Theorem	cnvex 5230	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- `' A e. _V
Theorem	relcnvexb 5231	A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.)
|- ( Rel R -> ( R e. _V <-> `' R e. _V ) )
Theorem	ressn 5232	Restriction of a class to a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
|- ( A |` { B } ) = ( { B } X. ( A " { B } ) )
Theorem	cnviinm 5233*	The converse of an intersection is the intersection of the converse. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E. y y e. A -> `' |^|_ x e. A B = |^|_ x e. A `' B )
Theorem	cnvpom 5234*	The converse of a partial order relation is a partial order relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> ( R Po A <-> `' R Po A ) )
Theorem	cnvsom 5235*	The converse of a strict order relation is a strict order relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> ( R Or A <-> `' R Or A ) )
Theorem	coexg 5236	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A o. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	coex 5237	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A o. B ) e. _V
Theorem	xpcom 5238*	Composition of two cross products. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E. x x e. B -> ( ( B X. C ) o. ( A X. B ) ) = ( A X. C ) )
2.6.7  Definite description binder (inverted iota)
Syntax	cio 5239	Extend class notation with Russell's definition description binder (inverted iota).
class ( iota x ph )
Theorem	iotajust 5240*	Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 5241. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- U. { y | { x | ph } = { y } } = U. { z | { x | ph } = { z } }
Definition	df-iota 5241*	Define Russell's definition description binder, which can be read as "the unique x such that ph," where ph ordinarily contains x as a free variable. Our definition is meaningful only when there is exactly one x such that ph is true (see iotaval 5252); otherwise, it evaluates to the empty set (see iotanul 5256). Russell used the inverted iota symbol iota to represent the binder. Sometimes proofs need to expand an iota-based definition. That is, given "X = the x for which ... x ... x ..." holds, the proof needs to get to "... X ... X ...". A general strategy to do this is to use iotacl 5265 (for unbounded iota). This can be easier than applying a version that applies an explicit substitution, because substituting an iota into its own property always has a bound variable clash which must be first renamed or else guarded with NF. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
|- ( iota x ph ) = U. { y | { x | ph } = { y } }
Theorem	dfiota2 5242*	Alternate definition for descriptions. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
|- ( iota x ph ) = U. { y | A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) }
Theorem	nfiota1 5243	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the iota class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x ( iota x ph )
Theorem	nfiotadw 5244*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the iota class. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/_ x ( iota y ps ) )
Theorem	nfiotaw 5245*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the iota class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/_ x ( iota y ph )
Theorem	cbviota 5246	Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y ps )
Theorem	cbviotav 5247*	Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y ps )
Theorem	sb8iota 5248	Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 2068. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	iotaeq 5249	Equality theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y ph ) )
Theorem	iotabi 5250	Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( iota x ph ) = ( iota x ps ) )
Theorem	uniabio 5251*	Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) -> U. { x | ph } = y )
Theorem	iotaval 5252*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) -> ( iota x ph ) = y )
Theorem	iotauni 5253	Equivalence between two different forms of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) = U. { x | ph } )
Theorem	iotaint 5254	Equivalence between two different forms of iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) = |^| { x | ph } )
Theorem	iota1 5255	Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( ph <-> ( iota x ph ) = x ) )
Theorem	iotanul 5256	Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one x that satisfies ph. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( -. E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) = (/) )
Theorem	euiotaex 5257	Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the iota class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) e. _V )
Theorem	iotass 5258*	Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
|- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> ( iota x ph ) C_ A )
Theorem	iotaexab 5259	Existence of the iota class when all the possible values are contained in a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2025.)
|- ( { x | ph } e. V -> ( iota x ph ) e. _V )
Theorem	iota4 5260	Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
|- ( E! x ph -> [. ( iota x ph ) / x ]. ph )
Theorem	iota4an 5261	Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
|- ( E! x ( ph /\ ps ) -> [. ( iota x ( ph /\ ps ) ) / x ]. ph )
Theorem	iota5 5262*	A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
|- ( ( ph /\ A e. V ) -> ( ps <-> x = A ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ A e. V ) -> ( iota x ps ) = A )
Theorem	iotabidv 5263*	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( iota x ps ) = ( iota x ch ) )
Theorem	iotabii 5264	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota x ps )
Theorem	iotacl 5265	Membership law for descriptions. This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 5241). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
|- ( E! x ph -> ( iota x ph ) e. { x | ph } )
Theorem	iota2df 5266	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that ph " with a class expression A. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> B e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> E! x ps )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = B ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ch <-> ( iota x ps ) = B ) )
Theorem	iota2d 5267*	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that ph " with a class expression A. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> B e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> E! x ps )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = B ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ch <-> ( iota x ps ) = B ) )
Theorem	eliota 5268*	An element of an iota expression. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.)
|- ( A e. ( iota x ph ) <-> E. y ( A e. y /\ A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) ) )
Theorem	eliotaeu 5269	An inhabited iota expression has a unique value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.)
|- ( A e. ( iota x ph ) -> E! x ph )
Theorem	iota2 5270*	The unique element such that ph. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ E! x ph ) -> ( ps <-> ( iota x ph ) = A ) )
Theorem	sniota 5271	A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph -> { x | ph } = { ( iota x ph ) } )
Theorem	iotam 5272*	Representation of "the unique element such that ph " with a class expression A which is inhabited (that means that "the unique element such that ph " exists). (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ E. w w e. A /\ A = ( iota x ph ) ) -> ps )
Theorem	csbiotag 5273*	Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
|- ( A e. V -> [_ A / x ]_ ( iota y ph ) = ( iota y [. A / x ]. ph ) )
2.6.8  Functions
Syntax	wfun 5274	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: A is a function.)
wff Fun A
Syntax	wfn 5275	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: A is a function on B.)
wff A Fn B
Syntax	wf 5276	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: F maps A into B.)
wff F : A --> B
Syntax	wf1 5277	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: F maps A one-to-one into B.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff F : A -1-1-> B
Syntax	wfo 5278	Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: F maps A onto B.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff F : A -onto-> B
Syntax	wf1o 5279	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: F maps A one-to-one onto B.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff F : A -1-1-onto-> B
Syntax	cfv 5280	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. (Read: The value of F at A, or " F of A.")
class ( F ` A )
Syntax	wiso 5281	Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. (Read: H is an R, S isomorphism of A onto B.)
wff H Isom R , S ( A , B )
Definition	df-fun 5282	Define predicate that determines if some class A is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun _I is true (funi 5312). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 4113 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 4115). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 5283), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 5284), a one-to-one function (df-f1 5285), an onto function (df-fo 5286), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 5287). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 5290, dffun4 5291, dffun6 5294, dffun7 5307, dffun8 5308, and dffun9 5309. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ ( A o. `' A ) C_ _I ) )
Definition	df-fn 5283	Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A Fn B <-> ( Fun A /\ dom A = B ) )
Definition	df-f 5284	Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( F : A --> B <-> ( F Fn A /\ ran F C_ B ) )
Definition	df-f1 5285	Define a one-to-one function. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( F : A -1-1-> B <-> ( F : A --> B /\ Fun `' F ) )
Definition	df-fo 5286	Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( F : A -onto-> B <-> ( F Fn A /\ ran F = B ) )
Definition	df-f1o 5287	Define a one-to-one onto function. Compare Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B <-> ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ F : A -onto-> B ) )
Definition	df-fv 5288*	Define the value of a function, ( F ` A ), also known as function application. For example, ( _I ` (/) ) = (/). Typically, function F is defined using maps-to notation (see df-mpt 4115), but this is not required. For example, F = { <. 2 , 6 >. , <. 3 , 9 >. } -> ( F ` 3 ) = 9. We will later define two-argument functions using ordered pairs as ( A F B ) = ( F ` <. A , B >. ). This particular definition is quite convenient: it can be applied to any class and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful. The left apostrophe notation originated with Peano and was adopted in Definition *30.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 235, Definition 10.11 of [Quine] p. 68, and Definition 6.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. It means the same thing as the more familiar F ( A ) notation for a function's value at A, i.e., " F of A," but without context-dependent notational ambiguity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) Revised to use iota. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
|- ( F ` A ) = ( iota x A F x )
Definition	df-isom 5289*	Define the isomorphism predicate. We read this as " H is an R, S isomorphism of A onto B". Normally, R and S are ordering relations on A and B respectively. Definition 6.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32, whose notation is the same as ours except that R and S are subscripts. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
|- ( H Isom R , S ( A , B ) <-> ( H : A -1-1-onto-> B /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y <-> ( H ` x ) S ( H ` y ) ) ) )
Theorem	dffun2 5290*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
|- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x A. y A. z ( ( x A y /\ x A z ) -> y = z ) ) )
Theorem	dffun4 5291*	Alternate definition of a function. Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
|- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x A. y A. z ( ( <. x , y >. e. A /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) -> y = z ) ) )
Theorem	dffun5r 5292*	A way of proving a relation is a function, analogous to mo2r 2107. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2020.)
|- ( ( Rel A /\ A. x E. z A. y ( <. x , y >. e. A -> y = z ) ) -> Fun A )
Theorem	dffun6f 5293*	Definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   =>    |- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x E* y x A y ) )
Theorem	dffun6 5294*	Alternate definition of a function using "at most one" notation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.)
|- ( Fun F <-> ( Rel F /\ A. x E* y x F y ) )
Theorem	funmo 5295*	A function has at most one value for each argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.)
|- ( Fun F -> E* y A F y )
Theorem	dffun4f 5296*	Definition of function like dffun4 5291 but using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Mar-2019.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ z A   =>    |- ( Fun A <-> ( Rel A /\ A. x A. y A. z ( ( <. x , y >. e. A /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) -> y = z ) ) )
Theorem	funrel 5297	A function is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Fun A -> Rel A )
Theorem	0nelfun 5298	A function does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Nov-2021.)
|- ( Fun R -> (/) e/ R )
Theorem	funss 5299	Subclass theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
|- ( A C_ B -> ( Fun B -> Fun A ) )
Theorem	funeq 5300	Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Fun A <-> Fun B ) )