P. 75 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7401-7500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	exmidontriimlem3 7401*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7403. What we get to do based on induction on both A and B. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. B ( A e. y \/ A = y \/ y e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem4 7402*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7403. The induction step for the induction on A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriim 7403*	Excluded middle implies ordinal trichotomy. Lemma 10.4.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The proof follows the proof from the HoTT book fairly closely. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
2.6.45  Excluded middle and the power set of a singleton
Theorem	iftrueb01 7404	Using an if expression to represent a truth value by (/) or 1o. Unlike some theorems using if, ph does not need to be decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2026.)
|- ( if ( ph , 1o , (/) ) = 1o <-> ph )
Theorem	pw1m 7405*	A truth value which is inhabited is equal to true. This is a variation of pwntru 4282 and pwtrufal 16322. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
|- ( ( A e. ~P 1o /\ E. x x e. A ) -> A = 1o )
Theorem	pw1if 7406	Expressing a truth value in terms of an if expression. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
|- ( A e. ~P 1o -> if ( A = 1o , 1o , (/) ) = A )
Theorem	pw1on 7407	The power set of 1o is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o e. On
Theorem	pw1dom2 7408	The power set of 1o dominates 2o. Also see pwpw0ss 3882 which is similar. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2022.)
|- 2o ~<_ ~P 1o
Theorem	pw1ne0 7409	The power set of 1o is not zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= (/)
Theorem	pw1ne1 7410	The power set of 1o is not one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 1o
Theorem	pw1ne3 7411	The power set of 1o is not three. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 3o
Theorem	pw1nel3 7412	Negated excluded middle implies that the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. ~P 1o e. 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1ne3 7413	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not three . (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> suc ~P 1o =/= 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1nel3 7414	The successor of the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- -. suc ~P 1o e. 3o
Theorem	3nelsucpw1 7415	Three is not an element of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- -. 3o e. suc ~P 1o
Theorem	sucpw1nss3 7416	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not a subset of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. suc ~P 1o C_ 3o )
Theorem	3nsssucpw1 7417	Negated excluded middle implies that 3o is not a subset of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. 3o C_ suc ~P 1o )
Theorem	onntri35 7418*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. There are five equivalent statements: (1) -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ), (2) -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ), (3) A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ), (4) A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ), and (5) -. -. EXMID. That these are all equivalent is expressed by (1) implies (3) (onntri13 7419), (3) implies (5) (onntri35 7418), (5) implies (1) (onntri51 7421), (2) implies (4) (onntri24 7423), (4) implies (5) (onntri45 7422), and (5) implies (2) (onntri52 7425). Another way of stating this is that EXMID is equivalent to trichotomy, either the x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x or the x C_ y \/ y C_ x form, as shown in exmidontri 7420 and exmidontri2or 7424, respectively. Thus -. -. EXMID is equivalent to (1) or (2). In addition, -. -. EXMID is equivalent to (3) by onntri3or 7426 and (4) by onntri2or 7427. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) -> -. -. EXMID )
Theorem	onntri13 7419	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) -> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidontri 7420*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri51 7421*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID -> -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri45 7422*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) -> -. -. EXMID )
Theorem	onntri24 7423	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) -> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	exmidontri2or 7424*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	onntri52 7425*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID -> -. -. A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	onntri3or 7426*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
Theorem	onntri2or 7427*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- ( -. -. EXMID <-> A. x e. On A. y e. On -. -. ( x C_ y \/ y C_ x ) )
Theorem	fmelpw1o 7428	With a formula ph one can associate an element of ~P 1o, which can therefore be thought of as the set of "truth values" (but recall that there are no other genuine truth values than T. and F., by nndc 856, which translate to 1o and (/) respectively by iftrue 3607 and iffalse 3610, giving pwtrufal 16322). As proved in if0ab 16127, the associated element of ~P 1o is the extension, in ~P 1o, of the formula ph. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
|- if ( ph , 1o , (/) ) e. ~P 1o
2.6.46  Apartness relations
Syntax	wap 7429	Apartness predicate symbol.
wff R Ap A
Definition	df-pap 7430*	Apartness predicate. A relation R is an apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, and cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
|- ( R Ap A <-> ( ( R C_ ( A X. A ) /\ A. x e. A -. x R x ) /\ ( A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y -> y R x ) /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A A. z e. A ( x R y -> ( x R z \/ y R z ) ) ) ) )
Syntax	wtap 7431	Tight apartness predicate symbol.
wff R TAp A
Definition	df-tap 7432*	Tight apartness predicate. A relation R is a tight apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, cotransitive, and tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
|- ( R TAp A <-> ( R Ap A /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( -. x R y -> x = y ) ) )
Theorem	dftap2 7433*	Tight apartness with the apartness properties from df-pap 7430 expanded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2025.)
|- ( R TAp A <-> ( R C_ ( A X. A ) /\ ( A. x e. A -. x R x /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y -> y R x ) ) /\ ( A. x e. A A. y e. A A. z e. A ( x R y -> ( x R z \/ y R z ) ) /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( -. x R y -> x = y ) ) ) )
Theorem	tapeq1 7434	Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R TAp A <-> S TAp A ) )
Theorem	tapeq2 7435	Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2025.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R TAp A <-> R TAp B ) )
Theorem	netap 7436*	Negated equality on a set with decidable equality is a tight apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. A DECID x = y -> { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) /\ u =/= v ) } TAp A )
Theorem	2onetap 7437*	Negated equality is a tight apartness on 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
|- { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. 2o /\ v e. 2o ) /\ u =/= v ) } TAp 2o
Theorem	2oneel 7438*	(/) and 1o are two unequal elements of 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
|- <. (/) , 1o >. e. { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. 2o /\ v e. 2o ) /\ u =/= v ) }
Theorem	2omotaplemap 7439*	Lemma for 2omotap 7441. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
|- ( -. -. ph -> { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. 2o /\ v e. 2o ) /\ ( ph /\ u =/= v ) ) } TAp 2o )
Theorem	2omotaplemst 7440*	Lemma for 2omotap 7441. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
|- ( ( E* r r TAp 2o /\ -. -. ph ) -> ph )
Theorem	2omotap 7441	If there is at most one tight apartness on 2o, excluded middle follows. Based on online discussions by Tom de Jong, Andrew W Swan, and Martin Escardo. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
|- ( E* r r TAp 2o -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidapne 7442*	Excluded middle implies there is only one tight apartness on any class, namely negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
|- (EXMID -> ( R TAp A <-> R = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
Theorem	exmidmotap 7443*	The proposition that every class has at most one tight apartness is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x E* r r TAp x )
PART 3  CHOICE PRINCIPLES We have already introduced the full Axiom of Choice df-ac 7384 but since it implies excluded middle as shown at exmidac 7387, it is not especially relevant to us. In this section we define countable choice and dependent choice, which are not as strong as thus often considered in mathematics which seeks to avoid full excluded middle.
3.1  Countable Choice and Dependent Choice
3.1.1  Introduce Countable Choice
Syntax	wacc 7444	Formula for an abbreviation of countable choice.
wff CCHOICE
Definition	df-cc 7445*	The expression CCHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of countable choice, analogous to df-ac 7384 for full choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Nov-2023.)
|- (CCHOICE <-> A. x ( dom x ~~ om -> E. f ( f C_ x /\ f Fn dom x ) ) )
Theorem	ccfunen 7446*	Existence of a choice function for a countably infinite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A ~~ om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A E. w w e. x )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. x ) )
Theorem	cc1 7447*	Countable choice in terms of a choice function on a countably infinite set of inhabited sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
|- (CCHOICE -> A. x ( ( x ~~ om /\ A. z e. x E. w w e. z ) -> E. f A. z e. x ( f ` z ) e. z ) )
Theorem	cc2lem 7448*	Lemma for cc2 7449. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. om E. w w e. ( F ` x ) )   &    |- A = ( n e. om |-> ( { n } X. ( F ` n ) ) )   &    |- G = ( n e. om |-> ( 2nd ` ( f ` ( A ` n ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. g ( g Fn om /\ A. n e. om ( g ` n ) e. ( F ` n ) ) )
Theorem	cc2 7449*	Countable choice using sequences instead of countable sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn om )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. om E. w w e. ( F ` x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. g ( g Fn om /\ A. n e. om ( g ` n ) e. ( F ` n ) ) )
Theorem	cc3 7450*	Countable choice using a sequence F(n) . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N F e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. w w e. F )   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn N /\ A. n e. N ( f ` n ) e. F ) )
Theorem	cc4f 7451*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function f which can choose a value at each index n such that ch holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- F/_ n A   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   &    |- ( x = ( f ` n ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f : N --> A /\ A. n e. N ch ) )
Theorem	cc4 7452*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function f which can choose a value at each index n such that ch holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 1-May-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   &    |- ( x = ( f ` n ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f : N --> A /\ A. n e. N ch ) )
Theorem	cc4n 7453*	Countable choice with a simpler restriction on how every set in the countable collection needs to be inhabited. That is, compared with cc4 7452, the hypotheses only require an A(n) for each value of n, not a single set A which suffices for every n e. om. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
|- ( ph -> CCHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N { x e. A | ps } e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> N ~~ om )   &    |- ( x = ( f ` n ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. n e. N E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn N /\ A. n e. N ch ) )
Theorem	acnccim 7454	Given countable choice, every set has choice sets of length om. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- (CCHOICE -> AC om = _V )
PART 4  REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBERS This section derives the basics of real and complex numbers. To construct the real numbers constructively, we follow two main sources. The first is Metamath Proof Explorer, which has the advantage of being already formalized in metamath. Its disadvantage, for our purposes, is that it assumes the law of the excluded middle throughout. Since we have already developed natural numbers ( for example, nna0 6618 and similar theorems ), going from there to positive integers (df-ni 7487) and then positive rational numbers (df-nqqs 7531) does not involve a major change in approach compared with the Metamath Proof Explorer. It is when we proceed to Dedekind cuts that we bring in more material from Section 11.2 of [HoTT], which focuses on the aspects of Dedekind cuts which are different without excluded middle or choice principles. With excluded middle, it is natural to define a cut as the lower set only (as Metamath Proof Explorer does), but here we define the cut as a pair of both the lower and upper sets, as [HoTT] does. There are also differences in how we handle order and replacing "not equal to zero" with "apart from zero". When working constructively, there are several possible definitions of real numbers. Here we adopt the most common definition, as two-sided Dedekind cuts with the properties described at df-inp 7649. The Cauchy reals (without countable choice) fail to satisfy ax-caucvg 8115 and the MacNeille reals fail to satisfy axltwlin 8210, and we do not develop them here. For more on differing definitions of the reals, see the introduction to Chapter 11 in [HoTT] or Section 1.2 of [BauerHanson].
4.1  Construction and axiomatization of real and complex numbers
4.1.1  Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers
Syntax	cnpi 7455	The set of positive integers, which is the set of natural numbers om with 0 removed. Note: This is the start of the Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers.
class N.
Syntax	cpli 7456	Positive integer addition.
class +N
Syntax	cmi 7457	Positive integer multiplication.
class .N
Syntax	clti 7458	Positive integer ordering relation.
class <N
Syntax	cplpq 7459	Positive pre-fraction addition.
class +pQ
Syntax	cmpq 7460	Positive pre-fraction multiplication.
class .pQ
Syntax	cltpq 7461	Positive pre-fraction ordering relation.
class <pQ
Syntax	ceq 7462	Equivalence class used to construct positive fractions.
class ~Q
Syntax	cnq 7463	Set of positive fractions.
class Q.
Syntax	c1q 7464	The positive fraction constant 1.
class 1Q
Syntax	cplq 7465	Positive fraction addition.
class +Q
Syntax	cmq 7466	Positive fraction multiplication.
class .Q
Syntax	crq 7467	Positive fraction reciprocal operation.
class *Q
Syntax	cltq 7468	Positive fraction ordering relation.
class <Q
Syntax	ceq0 7469	Equivalence class used to construct nonnegative fractions.
class ~Q0
Syntax	cnq0 7470	Set of nonnegative fractions.
class Q0
Syntax	c0q0 7471	The nonnegative fraction constant 0.
class 0Q0
Syntax	cplq0 7472	Nonnegative fraction addition.
class +Q0
Syntax	cmq0 7473	Nonnegative fraction multiplication.
class ·Q0
Syntax	cnp 7474	Set of positive reals.
class P.
Syntax	c1p 7475	Positive real constant 1.
class 1P
Syntax	cpp 7476	Positive real addition.
class +P.
Syntax	cmp 7477	Positive real multiplication.
class .P.
Syntax	cltp 7478	Positive real ordering relation.
class <P
Syntax	cer 7479	Equivalence class used to construct signed reals.
class ~R
Syntax	cnr 7480	Set of signed reals.
class R.
Syntax	c0r 7481	The signed real constant 0.
class 0R
Syntax	c1r 7482	The signed real constant 1.
class 1R
Syntax	cm1r 7483	The signed real constant -1.
class -1R
Syntax	cplr 7484	Signed real addition.
class +R
Syntax	cmr 7485	Signed real multiplication.
class .R
Syntax	cltr 7486	Signed real ordering relation.
class <R
Definition	df-ni 7487	Define the class of positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
|- N. = ( om \ { (/) } )
Definition	df-pli 7488	Define addition on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
|- +N = ( +o |` ( N. X. N. ) )
Definition	df-mi 7489	Define multiplication on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
|- .N = ( .o |` ( N. X. N. ) )
Definition	df-lti 7490	Define 'less than' on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-1996.)
|- <N = ( _E i^i ( N. X. N. ) )
Theorem	elni 7491	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
|- ( A e. N. <-> ( A e. om /\ A =/= (/) ) )
Theorem	pinn 7492	A positive integer is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
|- ( A e. N. -> A e. om )
Theorem	pion 7493	A positive integer is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1996.)
|- ( A e. N. -> A e. On )
Theorem	piord 7494	A positive integer is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
|- ( A e. N. -> Ord A )
Theorem	niex 7495	The class of positive integers is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
|- N. e. _V
Theorem	0npi 7496	The empty set is not a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
|- -. (/) e. N.
Theorem	elni2 7497	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-1995.)
|- ( A e. N. <-> ( A e. om /\ (/) e. A ) )
Theorem	1pi 7498	Ordinal 'one' is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
|- 1o e. N.
Theorem	addpiord 7499	Positive integer addition in terms of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( A e. N. /\ B e. N. ) -> ( A +N B ) = ( A +o B ) )
Theorem	mulpiord 7500	Positive integer multiplication in terms of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( A e. N. /\ B e. N. ) -> ( A .N B ) = ( A .o B ) )