P. 85 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 8401-8500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lenlt 8401	'Less than or equal to' expressed in terms of 'less than'. Part of definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A <_ B <-> -. B < A ) )
Theorem	ltnr 8402	'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
|- ( A e. RR -> -. A < A )
Theorem	ltso 8403	'Less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.)
|- < Or RR
Theorem	gtso 8404	'Greater than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by JJ, 11-Oct-2018.)
|- `' < Or RR
Theorem	lttri3 8405	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A = B <-> ( -. A < B /\ -. B < A ) ) )
Theorem	letri3 8406	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A = B <-> ( A <_ B /\ B <_ A ) ) )
Theorem	ltleletr 8407	Transitive law, weaker form of ( A < B /\ B <_ C ) -> A < C. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2018.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A < B /\ B <_ C ) -> A <_ C ) )
Theorem	letr 8408	Transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <_ B /\ B <_ C ) -> A <_ C ) )
Theorem	leid 8409	'Less than or equal to' is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
|- ( A e. RR -> A <_ A )
Theorem	ltne 8410	'Less than' implies not equal. See also ltap 8961 which is the same but for apartness. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ A < B ) -> B =/= A )
Theorem	ltnsym 8411	'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A < B -> -. B < A ) )
Theorem	eqlelt 8412	Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A = B <-> ( A <_ B /\ -. A < B ) ) )
Theorem	ltle 8413	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> ( A < B -> A <_ B ) )
Theorem	lelttr 8414	Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A <_ B /\ B < C ) -> A < C ) )
Theorem	ltletr 8415	Transitive law. Part of Definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( A < B /\ B <_ C ) -> A < C ) )
Theorem	ltnsym2 8416	'Less than' is antisymmetric and irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> -. ( A < B /\ B < A ) )
Theorem	eqle 8417	Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ A = B ) -> A <_ B )
Theorem	ltnri 8418	'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
|- A e. RR   =>    |- -. A < A
Theorem	eqlei 8419	Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
|- A e. RR   =>    |- ( A = B -> A <_ B )
Theorem	eqlei2 8420	Equality implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.)
|- A e. RR   =>    |- ( B = A -> B <_ A )
Theorem	gtneii 8421	'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapii 8962 which is the same for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Sep-2013.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- A < B   =>    |- B =/= A
Theorem	ltneii 8422	'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- A < B   =>    |- A =/= B
Theorem	lttri3i 8423	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A = B <-> ( -. A < B /\ -. B < A ) )
Theorem	letri3i 8424	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A = B <-> ( A <_ B /\ B <_ A ) )
Theorem	ltnsymi 8425	'Less than' is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A < B -> -. B < A )
Theorem	lenlti 8426	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A <_ B <-> -. B < A )
Theorem	ltlei 8427	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A < B -> A <_ B )
Theorem	ltleii 8428	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to' (inference). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   &    |- A < B   =>    |- A <_ B
Theorem	ltnei 8429	'Less than' implies not equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( A < B -> B =/= A )
Theorem	lttri 8430	'Less than' is transitive. Theorem I.17 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   &    |- C e. RR   =>    |- ( ( A < B /\ B < C ) -> A < C )
Theorem	lelttri 8431	'Less than or equal to', 'less than' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   &    |- C e. RR   =>    |- ( ( A <_ B /\ B < C ) -> A < C )
Theorem	ltletri 8432	'Less than', 'less than or equal to' transitive law. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   &    |- C e. RR   =>    |- ( ( A < B /\ B <_ C ) -> A < C )
Theorem	letri 8433	'Less than or equal to' is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   &    |- C e. RR   =>    |- ( ( A <_ B /\ B <_ C ) -> A <_ C )
Theorem	le2tri3i 8434	Extended trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2000.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   &    |- C e. RR   =>    |- ( ( A <_ B /\ B <_ C /\ C <_ A ) <-> ( A = B /\ B = C /\ C = A ) )
Theorem	mulgt0i 8435	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   =>    |- ( ( 0 < A /\ 0 < B ) -> 0 < ( A x. B ) )
Theorem	mulgt0ii 8436	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.)
|- A e. RR   &    |- B e. RR   &    |- 0 < A   &    |- 0 < B   =>    |- 0 < ( A x. B )
Theorem	ltnrd 8437	'Less than' is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. A < A )
Theorem	gtned 8438	'Less than' implies not equal. See also gtapd 8965 which is the same but for apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < B )   =>    |- ( ph -> B =/= A )
Theorem	ltned 8439	'Greater than' implies not equal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A =/= B )
Theorem	lttri3d 8440	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A = B <-> ( -. A < B /\ -. B < A ) ) )
Theorem	letri3d 8441	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A = B <-> ( A <_ B /\ B <_ A ) ) )
Theorem	letrid 8442	Tightness of real apartness. (Contributed by Matthew House, 28-Jun-2026.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> B <_ A )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = B )
Theorem	eqleltd 8443	Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A = B <-> ( A <_ B /\ -. A < B ) ) )
Theorem	lenltd 8444	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A <_ B <-> -. B < A ) )
Theorem	ltled 8445	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )
Theorem	ltnsymd 8446	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. B < A )
Theorem	nltled 8447	'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> -. B < A )   =>    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )
Theorem	lensymd 8448	'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. B < A )
Theorem	mulgt0d 8449	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < B )   =>    |- ( ph -> 0 < ( A x. B ) )
Theorem	letrd 8450	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> B <_ C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A <_ C )
Theorem	lelttrd 8451	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A <_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> B < C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A < C )
Theorem	lttrd 8452	Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < B )   &    |- ( ph -> B < C )   =>    |- ( ph -> A < C )
Theorem	0lt1 8453	0 is less than 1. Theorem I.21 of [Apostol] p. 20. Part of definition 11.2.7(vi) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
|- 0 < 1
Theorem	ltntri 8454	Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we cannot prove real number trichotomy, A < B \/ A = B \/ B < A. Does that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no, as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) -> -. ( -. A < B /\ -. A = B /\ -. B < A ) )
4.2.5  Initial properties of the complex numbers
Theorem	mul12 8455	Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) = ( B x. ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	mul32 8456	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. B ) )
Theorem	mul31 8457	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( C x. B ) x. A ) )
Theorem	mul4 8458	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) /\ ( C e. CC /\ D e. CC ) ) -> ( ( A x. B ) x. ( C x. D ) ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. ( B x. D ) ) )
Theorem	muladd11 8459	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( ( 1 + A ) x. ( 1 + B ) ) = ( ( 1 + A ) + ( B + ( A x. B ) ) ) )
Theorem	1p1times 8460	Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( ( 1 + 1 ) x. A ) = ( A + A ) )
Theorem	peano2cn 8461	A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4742. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 1 ) e. CC )
Theorem	peano2re 8462	A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2 4742. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.)
|- ( A e. RR -> ( A + 1 ) e. RR )
Theorem	addcom 8463	Addition is commutative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	addrid 8464	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	addlid 8465	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( 0 + A ) = A )
Theorem	readdcan 8466	Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR ) -> ( ( C + A ) = ( C + B ) <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	00id 8467	0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- ( 0 + 0 ) = 0
Theorem	addridi 8468	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( A + 0 ) = A
Theorem	addlidi 8469	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- A e. CC   =>    |- ( 0 + A ) = A
Theorem	addcomi 8470	Addition is commutative. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( A + B ) = ( B + A )
Theorem	addcomli 8471	Addition is commutative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- ( A + B ) = C   =>    |- ( B + A ) = C
Theorem	mul12i 8472	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) = ( B x. ( A x. C ) )
Theorem	mul32i 8473	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. B )
Theorem	mul4i 8474	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   &    |- D e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A x. B ) x. ( C x. D ) ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. ( B x. D ) )
Theorem	addridd 8475	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + 0 ) = A )
Theorem	addlidd 8476	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( 0 + A ) = A )
Theorem	addcomd 8477	Addition is commutative. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + B ) = ( B + A ) )
Theorem	mul12d 8478	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. ( B x. C ) ) = ( B x. ( A x. C ) ) )
Theorem	mul32d 8479	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. B ) )
Theorem	mul31d 8480	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) x. C ) = ( ( C x. B ) x. A ) )
Theorem	mul4d 8481	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A x. B ) x. ( C x. D ) ) = ( ( A x. C ) x. ( B x. D ) ) )
Theorem	muladd11r 8482	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) -> ( ( A + 1 ) x. ( B + 1 ) ) = ( ( ( A x. B ) + ( A + B ) ) + 1 ) )
Theorem	comraddd 8483	Commute RHS addition, in deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.)
|- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> A = ( B + C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = ( C + B ) )
4.3  Real and complex numbers - basic operations
4.3.1  Addition
Theorem	add12 8484	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A + ( B + C ) ) = ( B + ( A + C ) ) )
Theorem	add32 8485	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( ( A + C ) + B ) )
Theorem	add32r 8486	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum, rearranging the parentheses. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ C e. CC ) -> ( A + ( B + C ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + B ) )
Theorem	add4 8487	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
|- ( ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) /\ ( C e. CC /\ D e. CC ) ) -> ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( B + D ) ) )
Theorem	add42 8488	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2005.)
|- ( ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC ) /\ ( C e. CC /\ D e. CC ) ) -> ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( D + B ) ) )
Theorem	add12i 8489	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( A + ( B + C ) ) = ( B + ( A + C ) )
Theorem	add32i 8490	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( ( A + C ) + B )
Theorem	add4i 8491	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   &    |- D e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( B + D ) )
Theorem	add42i 8492	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.)
|- A e. CC   &    |- B e. CC   &    |- C e. CC   &    |- D e. CC   =>    |- ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( D + B ) )
Theorem	add12d 8493	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A + ( B + C ) ) = ( B + ( A + C ) ) )
Theorem	add32d 8494	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) + C ) = ( ( A + C ) + B ) )
Theorem	add4d 8495	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( B + D ) ) )
Theorem	add42d 8496	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A + B ) + ( C + D ) ) = ( ( A + C ) + ( D + B ) ) )
4.3.2  Subtraction
Syntax	cmin 8497	Extend class notation to include subtraction.
class -
Syntax	cneg 8498	Extend class notation to include unary minus. The symbol -u is not a class by itself but part of a compound class definition. We do this rather than making it a formal function since it is so commonly used. Note: We use different symbols for unary minus ( -u) and subtraction cmin 8497 ( -) to prevent syntax ambiguity. For example, looking at the syntax definition co 6085, if we used the same symbol then " ( - A - B ) " could mean either " - A " minus " B", or it could represent the (meaningless) operation of classes " - " and " - B " connected with "operation" " A". On the other hand, " ( -u A - B ) " is unambiguous.
class -u A
Definition	df-sub 8499*	Define subtraction. Theorem subval 8518 shows its value (and describes how this definition works), Theorem subaddi 8613 relates it to addition, and Theorems subcli 8602 and resubcli 8589 prove its closure laws. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1994.)
|- - = ( x e. CC , y e. CC |-> ( iota_ z e. CC ( y + z ) = x ) )
Definition	df-neg 8500	Define the negative of a number (unary minus). We use different symbols for unary minus ( -u) and subtraction ( -) to prevent syntax ambiguity. See cneg 8498 for a discussion of this. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
|- -u A = ( 0 - A )