P. 68 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6701-6800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ss2ixp 6701	Subclass theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
|- ( A. x e. A B C_ C -> X_ x e. A B C_ X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpeq2 6702	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A. x e. A B = C -> X_ x e. A B = X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpeq2dva 6703*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> X_ x e. A B = X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpeq2dv 6704*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> X_ x e. A B = X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	cbvixp 6705*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
|- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ x C   &    |- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = X_ y e. A C
Theorem	cbvixpv 6706*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = X_ y e. A C
Theorem	nfixpxy 6707*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ y B   =>    |- F/_ y X_ x e. A B
Theorem	nfixp1 6708	The index variable in an indexed Cartesian product is not free. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x X_ x e. A B
Theorem	ixpprc 6709*	A cartesian product of proper-class many sets is empty, because any function in the cartesian product has to be a set with domain A, which is not possible for a proper class domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> X_ x e. A B = (/) )
Theorem	ixpf 6710*	A member of an infinite Cartesian product maps to the indexed union of the product argument. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- ( F e. X_ x e. A B -> F : A --> U_ x e. A B )
Theorem	uniixp 6711*	The union of an infinite Cartesian product is included in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- U. X_ x e. A B C_ ( A X. U_ x e. A B )
Theorem	ixpexgg 6712*	The existence of an infinite Cartesian product. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. Remark in Enderton p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. W /\ A. x e. A B e. V ) -> X_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	ixpin 6713*	The intersection of two infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- X_ x e. A ( B i^i C ) = ( X_ x e. A B i^i X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpiinm 6714*	The indexed intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- ( E. z z e. B -> X_ x e. A |^|_ y e. B C = |^|_ y e. B X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpintm 6715*	The intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- ( E. z z e. B -> X_ x e. A |^| B = |^|_ y e. B X_ x e. A y )
Theorem	ixp0x 6716	An infinite Cartesian product with an empty index set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2007.)
|- X_ x e. (/) A = { (/) }
Theorem	ixpssmap2g 6717*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. This version of ixpssmapg 6718 avoids ax-coll 4113. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- ( U_ x e. A B e. V -> X_ x e. A B C_ ( U_ x e. A B ^m A ) )
Theorem	ixpssmapg 6718*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A B e. V -> X_ x e. A B C_ ( U_ x e. A B ^m A ) )
Theorem	0elixp 6719	Membership of the empty set in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 29-Sep-2006.)
|- (/) e. X_ x e. (/) A
Theorem	ixpm 6720*	If an infinite Cartesian product of a family B ( x ) is inhabited, every B ( x ) is inhabited. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2023.)
|- ( E. f f e. X_ x e. A B -> A. x e. A E. z z e. B )
Theorem	ixp0 6721	The infinite Cartesian product of a family B ( x ) with an empty member is empty. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2023.)
|- ( E. x e. A B = (/) -> X_ x e. A B = (/) )
Theorem	ixpssmap 6722*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- X_ x e. A B C_ ( U_ x e. A B ^m A )
Theorem	resixp 6723*	Restriction of an element of an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
|- ( ( B C_ A /\ F e. X_ x e. A C ) -> ( F |` B ) e. X_ x e. B C )
Theorem	mptelixpg 6724*	Condition for an explicit member of an indexed product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Jan-2015.)
|- ( I e. V -> ( ( x e. I |-> J ) e. X_ x e. I K <-> A. x e. I J e. K ) )
Theorem	elixpsn 6725*	Membership in a class of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( F e. X_ x e. { A } B <-> E. y e. B F = { <. A , y >. } ) )
Theorem	ixpsnf1o 6726*	A bijection between a class and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> ( { I } X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( I e. V -> F : A -1-1-onto-> X_ y e. { I } A )
Theorem	mapsnf1o 6727*	A bijection between a set and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> ( { I } X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ I e. W ) -> F : A -1-1-onto-> ( A ^m { I } ) )
2.6.28  Equinumerosity
Syntax	cen 6728	Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation ("approximately equals" symbol)
class ~~
Syntax	cdom 6729	Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly less-than-or-equal)
class ~<_
Syntax	cfn 6730	Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
class Fin
Definition	df-en 6731*	Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129. We define ~~ to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren 6737. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-onto-> y }
Definition	df-dom 6732*	Define the dominance relation. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145. Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 6740 and domen 6741. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~<_ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-> y }
Definition	df-fin 6733*	Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91, whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to our " a e. Fin". This definition is meaningful whether or not we accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 14288. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- Fin = { x | E. y e. om x ~~ y }
Theorem	relen 6734	Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~~
Theorem	reldom 6735	Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~<_
Theorem	encv 6736	If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	bren 6737*	Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-onto-> B )
Theorem	brdomg 6738*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B ) )
Theorem	brdomi 6739*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~<_ B -> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	brdom 6740*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	domen 6741*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) )
Theorem	domeng 6742*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) ) )
Theorem	ctex 6743	A class dominated by om is a set. See also ctfoex 7107 which says that a countable class is a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.) (Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 13-Mar-2023.)
|- ( A ~<_ om -> A e. _V )
Theorem	f1oen3g 6744	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6747 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1oen2g 6745	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6747 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom2g 6746	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This variation of f1domg 6748 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-> B ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	f1oeng 6747	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1domg 6748	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	f1oen 6749	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom 6750	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	isfi 6751*	Express " A is finite". Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91 (whose " Fin " is a predicate instead of a class). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- ( A e. Fin <-> E. x e. om A ~~ x )
Theorem	enssdom 6752	Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ C_ ~<_
Theorem	endom 6753	Equinumerosity implies dominance. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	enrefg 6754	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~~ A )
Theorem	enref 6755	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A ~~ A
Theorem	eqeng 6756	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = B -> A ~~ B ) )
Theorem	domrefg 6757	Dominance is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~<_ A )
Theorem	en2d 6758*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en3d 6759*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. A ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en2i 6760*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. _V )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. _V )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	en3i 6761*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. A )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	dom2lem 6762*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> C ) : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	dom2d 6763*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B e. R -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	dom3d 6764*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom2 6765*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( B e. V -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom3 6766*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	idssen 6767	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- _I C_ ~~
Theorem	ssdomg 6768	A set dominates its subsets. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A C_ B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	ener 6769	Equinumerosity is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- ~~ Er _V
Theorem	ensymb 6770	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> B ~~ A )
Theorem	ensym 6771	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> B ~~ A )
Theorem	ensymi 6772	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   =>    |- B ~~ A
Theorem	ensymd 6773	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Deduction form of ensym 6771. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A ~~ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> B ~~ A )
Theorem	entr 6774	Transitivity of equinumerosity. Theorem 3 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ B ~~ C ) -> A ~~ C )
Theorem	domtr 6775	Transitivity of dominance relation. Theorem 17 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~<_ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	entri 6776	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- B ~~ C   =>    |- A ~~ C
Theorem	entr2i 6777	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- B ~~ C   =>    |- C ~~ A
Theorem	entr3i 6778	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- A ~~ C   =>    |- B ~~ C
Theorem	entr4i 6779	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- C ~~ B   =>    |- A ~~ C
Theorem	endomtr 6780	Transitivity of equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ B ~<_ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	domentr 6781	Transitivity of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~~ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	f1imaeng 6782	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ C C_ A /\ C e. V ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	f1imaen2g 6783	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (This version of f1imaen 6784 does not need ax-setind 4530.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ B e. V ) /\ ( C C_ A /\ C e. V ) ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	f1imaen 6784	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.)
|- C e. _V   =>    |- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ C C_ A ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	en0 6785	The empty set is equinumerous only to itself. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ (/) <-> A = (/) )
Theorem	ensn1 6786	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { A } ~~ 1o
Theorem	ensn1g 6787	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	enpr1g 6788	{ A , A } has only one element. (Contributed by FL, 15-Feb-2010.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A , A } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	en1 6789*	A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|- ( A ~~ 1o <-> E. x A = { x } )
Theorem	en1bg 6790	A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A ~~ 1o <-> A = { U. A } ) )
Theorem	reuen1 6791*	Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> { x e. A | ph } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	euen1 6792	Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> { x | ph } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	euen1b 6793*	Two ways to express " A has a unique element". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ 1o <-> E! x x e. A )
Theorem	en1uniel 6794	A singleton contains its sole element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.)
|- ( S ~~ 1o -> U. S e. S )
Theorem	2dom 6795*	A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|- ( 2o ~<_ A -> E. x e. A E. y e. A -. x = y )
Theorem	fundmen 6796	A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- F e. _V   =>    |- ( Fun F -> dom F ~~ F )
Theorem	fundmeng 6797	A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ Fun F ) -> dom F ~~ F )
Theorem	cnven 6798	A relational set is equinumerous to its converse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ( Rel A /\ A e. V ) -> A ~~ `' A )
Theorem	cnvct 6799	If a set is dominated by om, so is its converse. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.)
|- ( A ~<_ om -> `' A ~<_ om )
Theorem	fndmeng 6800	A function is equinumerate to its domain. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( F Fn A /\ A e. C ) -> A ~~ F )