P. 68 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6701-6800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	3ecoptocl 6701*	Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|- S = ( ( D X. D ) /. R )   &    |- ( [ <. x , y >. ] R = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( [ <. z , w >. ] R = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( [ <. v , u >. ] R = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. D /\ y e. D ) /\ ( z e. D /\ w e. D ) /\ ( v e. D /\ u e. D ) ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S /\ C e. S ) -> th )
Theorem	brecop 6702*	Binary relation on a quotient set. Lemma for real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( G X. G )   &    |- H = ( ( G X. G ) /. .~ )   &    |- .<_ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. H /\ y e. H ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = [ <. z , w >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) /\ ph ) ) }   &    |- ( ( ( ( z e. G /\ w e. G ) /\ ( A e. G /\ B e. G ) ) /\ ( ( v e. G /\ u e. G ) /\ ( C e. G /\ D e. G ) ) ) -> ( ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ = [ <. A , B >. ] .~ /\ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ = [ <. C , D >. ] .~ ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. G /\ B e. G ) /\ ( C e. G /\ D e. G ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] .~ .<_ [ <. C , D >. ] .~ <-> ps ) )
Theorem	eroveu 6703*	Lemma for eroprf 6705. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|- J = ( A /. R )   &    |- K = ( B /. S )   &    |- ( ph -> T e. Z )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er U )   &    |- ( ph -> S Er V )   &    |- ( ph -> T Er W )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ U )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ V )   &    |- ( ph -> C C_ W )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. B ) --> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. B /\ u e. B ) ) ) -> ( ( r R s /\ t S u ) -> ( r .+ t ) T ( s .+ u ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( X e. J /\ Y e. K ) ) -> E! z E. p e. A E. q e. B ( ( X = [ p ] R /\ Y = [ q ] S ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] T ) )
Theorem	erovlem 6704*	Lemma for eroprf 6705. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- J = ( A /. R )   &    |- K = ( B /. S )   &    |- ( ph -> T e. Z )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er U )   &    |- ( ph -> S Er V )   &    |- ( ph -> T Er W )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ U )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ V )   &    |- ( ph -> C C_ W )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. B ) --> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. B /\ u e. B ) ) ) -> ( ( r R s /\ t S u ) -> ( r .+ t ) T ( s .+ u ) ) )   &    |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. p e. A E. q e. B ( ( x = [ p ] R /\ y = [ q ] S ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] T ) }   =>    |- ( ph -> .+^ = ( x e. J , y e. K |-> ( iota z E. p e. A E. q e. B ( ( x = [ p ] R /\ y = [ q ] S ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] T ) ) ) )
Theorem	eroprf 6705*	Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- J = ( A /. R )   &    |- K = ( B /. S )   &    |- ( ph -> T e. Z )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er U )   &    |- ( ph -> S Er V )   &    |- ( ph -> T Er W )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ U )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ V )   &    |- ( ph -> C C_ W )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. B ) --> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. B /\ u e. B ) ) ) -> ( ( r R s /\ t S u ) -> ( r .+ t ) T ( s .+ u ) ) )   &    |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. p e. A E. q e. B ( ( x = [ p ] R /\ y = [ q ] S ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] T ) }   &    |- ( ph -> R e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. Y )   &    |- L = ( C /. T )   =>    |- ( ph -> .+^ : ( J X. K ) --> L )
Theorem	eroprf2 6706*	Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
|- J = ( A /. .~ )   &    |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. p e. A E. q e. A ( ( x = [ p ] .~ /\ y = [ q ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] .~ ) }   &    |- ( ph -> .~ e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> .~ Er U )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ U )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. A ) --> A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. A /\ u e. A ) ) ) -> ( ( r .~ s /\ t .~ u ) -> ( r .+ t ) .~ ( s .+ u ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> .+^ : ( J X. J ) --> J )
Theorem	ecopoveq 6707*	This is the first of several theorems about equivalence relations of the kind used in construction of fractions and signed reals, involving operations on equivalent classes of ordered pairs. This theorem expresses the relation .~ (specified by the hypothesis) in terms of its operation F. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. .~ <. C , D >. <-> ( A .+ D ) = ( B .+ C ) ) )
Theorem	ecopovsym 6708*	Assuming the operation F is commutative, show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x )   =>    |- ( A .~ B -> B .~ A )
Theorem	ecopovtrn 6709*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- ( ( A .~ B /\ B .~ C ) -> A .~ C )
Theorem	ecopover 6710*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )
Theorem	ecopovsymg 6711*	Assuming the operation F is commutative, show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   =>    |- ( A .~ B -> B .~ A )
Theorem	ecopovtrng 6712*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- ( ( A .~ B /\ B .~ C ) -> A .~ C )
Theorem	ecopoverg 6713*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )
Theorem	th3qlem1 6714*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. The third hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|- .~ Er S   &    |- ( ( ( y e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ v e. S ) ) -> ( ( y .~ w /\ z .~ v ) -> ( y .+ z ) .~ ( w .+ v ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. ( S /. .~ ) /\ B e. ( S /. .~ ) ) -> E* x E. y E. z ( ( A = [ y ] .~ /\ B = [ z ] .~ ) /\ x = [ ( y .+ z ) ] .~ ) )
Theorem	th3qlem2 6715*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. The fourth hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- ( ( ( ( w e. S /\ v e. S ) /\ ( u e. S /\ t e. S ) ) /\ ( ( s e. S /\ f e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( <. w , v >. .~ <. u , t >. /\ <. s , f >. .~ <. g , h >. ) -> ( <. w , v >. .+ <. s , f >. ) .~ ( <. u , t >. .+ <. g , h >. ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) /\ B e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) ) -> E* z E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( A = [ <. w , v >. ] .~ /\ B = [ <. u , t >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. w , v >. .+ <. u , t >. ) ] .~ ) )
Theorem	th3qcor 6716*	Corollary of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- ( ( ( ( w e. S /\ v e. S ) /\ ( u e. S /\ t e. S ) ) /\ ( ( s e. S /\ f e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( <. w , v >. .~ <. u , t >. /\ <. s , f >. .~ <. g , h >. ) -> ( <. w , v >. .+ <. s , f >. ) .~ ( <. u , t >. .+ <. g , h >. ) ) )   &    |- G = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) /\ y e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( x = [ <. w , v >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. u , t >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. w , v >. .+ <. u , t >. ) ] .~ ) ) }   =>    |- Fun G
Theorem	th3q 6717*	Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- ( ( ( ( w e. S /\ v e. S ) /\ ( u e. S /\ t e. S ) ) /\ ( ( s e. S /\ f e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( <. w , v >. .~ <. u , t >. /\ <. s , f >. .~ <. g , h >. ) -> ( <. w , v >. .+ <. s , f >. ) .~ ( <. u , t >. .+ <. g , h >. ) ) )   &    |- G = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) /\ y e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( x = [ <. w , v >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. u , t >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. w , v >. .+ <. u , t >. ) ] .~ ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] .~ G [ <. C , D >. ] .~ ) = [ ( <. A , B >. .+ <. C , D >. ) ] .~ )
Theorem	oviec 6718*	Express an operation on equivalence classes of ordered pairs in terms of equivalence class of operations on ordered pairs. See iset.mm for additional comments describing the hypotheses. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> H e. ( S X. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( a e. S /\ b e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) -> K e. ( S X. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( c e. S /\ d e. S ) /\ ( t e. S /\ s e. S ) ) -> L e. ( S X. S ) )   &    |- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ph ) ) }   &    |- ( ( ( z = a /\ w = b ) /\ ( v = c /\ u = d ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ( ( z = g /\ w = h ) /\ ( v = t /\ u = s ) ) -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- .+ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = J ) ) }   &    |- ( ( ( w = a /\ v = b ) /\ ( u = g /\ f = h ) ) -> J = K )   &    |- ( ( ( w = c /\ v = d ) /\ ( u = t /\ f = s ) ) -> J = L )   &    |- ( ( ( w = A /\ v = B ) /\ ( u = C /\ f = D ) ) -> J = H )   &    |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. Q /\ y e. Q ) /\ E. a E. b E. c E. d ( ( x = [ <. a , b >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. c , d >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. a , b >. .+ <. c , d >. ) ] .~ ) ) }   &    |- Q = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( ( a e. S /\ b e. S ) /\ ( c e. S /\ d e. S ) ) /\ ( ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) /\ ( t e. S /\ s e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( ps /\ ch ) -> K .~ L ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] .~ .+^ [ <. C , D >. ] .~ ) = [ H ] .~ )
Theorem	ecovcom 6719*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. Most uses will want ecovicom 6720 instead. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- C = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. D , G >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- D = H   &    |- G = J   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A .+ B ) = ( B .+ A ) )
Theorem	ecovicom 6720*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)
|- C = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. D , G >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> D = H )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> G = J )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A .+ B ) = ( B .+ A ) )
Theorem	ecovass 6721*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. In most cases ecoviass 6722 will be more useful. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. G , H >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. G , H >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. J , K >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ ) = [ <. L , M >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) )   &    |- J = L   &    |- K = M   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( ( A .+ B ) .+ C ) = ( A .+ ( B .+ C ) ) )
Theorem	ecoviass 6722*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. G , H >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. G , H >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. J , K >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ ) = [ <. L , M >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> J = L )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> K = M )   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( ( A .+ B ) .+ C ) = ( A .+ ( B .+ C ) ) )
Theorem	ecovdi 6723*	Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. Most likely ecovidi 6724 will be more helpful. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. M , N >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. M , N >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. W , X >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) /\ ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. W , X >. ] .~ .+ [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ ) = [ <. K , L >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) )   &    |- H = K   &    |- J = L   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( A .x. ( B .+ C ) ) = ( ( A .x. B ) .+ ( A .x. C ) ) )
Theorem	ecovidi 6724*	Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Sep-2019.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. M , N >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. M , N >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. W , X >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) /\ ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. W , X >. ] .~ .+ [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ ) = [ <. K , L >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> H = K )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> J = L )   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( A .x. ( B .+ C ) ) = ( ( A .x. B ) .+ ( A .x. C ) ) )
2.6.26  The mapping operation
Syntax	cmap 6725	Extend the definition of a class to include the mapping operation. (Read for A ^m B, "the set of all functions that map from B to A.)
class ^m
Syntax	cpm 6726	Extend the definition of a class to include the partial mapping operation. (Read for A ^pm B, "the set of all partial functions that map from B to A.)
class ^pm
Definition	df-map 6727*	Define the mapping operation or set exponentiation. The set of all functions that map from B to A is written ( A ^m B ) (see mapval 6737). Many authors write A followed by B as a superscript for this operation and rely on context to avoid confusion other exponentiation operations (e.g., Definition 10.42 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 95). Other authors show B as a prefixed superscript, which is read " A pre B " (e.g., definition of [Enderton] p. 52). Definition 8.21 of [Eisenberg] p. 125 uses the notation Map( B, A) for our ( A ^m B ). The up-arrow is used by Donald Knuth for iterated exponentiation (Science 194, 1235-1242, 1976). We adopt the first case of his notation (simple exponentiation) and subscript it with m to distinguish it from other kinds of exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
|- ^m = ( x e. _V , y e. _V |-> { f | f : y --> x } )
Definition	df-pm 6728*	Define the partial mapping operation. A partial function from B to A is a function from a subset of B to A. The set of all partial functions from B to A is written ( A ^pm B ) (see pmvalg 6736). A notation for this operation apparently does not appear in the literature. We use ^pm to distinguish it from the less general set exponentiation operation ^m (df-map 6727) . See mapsspm 6759 for its relationship to set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.)
|- ^pm = ( x e. _V , y e. _V |-> { f e. ~P ( y X. x ) | Fun f } )
Theorem	mapprc 6729*	When A is a proper class, the class of all functions mapping A to B is empty. Exercise 4.41 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> { f | f : A --> B } = (/) )
Theorem	pmex 6730*	The class of all partial functions from one set to another is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> { f | ( Fun f /\ f C_ ( A X. B ) ) } e. _V )
Theorem	mapex 6731*	The class of all functions mapping one set to another is a set. Remark after Definition 10.24 of [Kunen] p. 31. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 4-Dec-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> { f | f : A --> B } e. _V )
Theorem	fnmap 6732	Set exponentiation has a universal domain. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ^m Fn ( _V X. _V )
Theorem	fnpm 6733	Partial function exponentiation has a universal domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2013.)
|- ^pm Fn ( _V X. _V )
Theorem	reldmmap 6734	Set exponentiation is a well-behaved binary operator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Feb-2015.)
|- Rel dom ^m
Theorem	mapvalg 6735*	The value of set exponentiation. ( A ^m B ) is the set of all functions that map from B to A. Definition 10.24 of [Kunen] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( A ^m B ) = { f | f : B --> A } )
Theorem	pmvalg 6736*	The value of the partial mapping operation. ( A ^pm B ) is the set of all partial functions that map from B to A. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( A ^pm B ) = { f e. ~P ( B X. A ) | Fun f } )
Theorem	mapval 6737*	The value of set exponentiation (inference version). ( A ^m B ) is the set of all functions that map from B to A. Definition 10.24 of [Kunen] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ^m B ) = { f | f : B --> A }
Theorem	elmapg 6738	Membership relation for set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( C e. ( A ^m B ) <-> C : B --> A ) )
Theorem	elmapd 6739	Deduction form of elmapg 6738. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( C e. ( A ^m B ) <-> C : B --> A ) )
Theorem	mapdm0 6740	The empty set is the only map with empty domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Dec-2021.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( B ^m (/) ) = { (/) } )
Theorem	elpmg 6741	The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( C e. ( A ^pm B ) <-> ( Fun C /\ C C_ ( B X. A ) ) ) )
Theorem	elpm2g 6742	The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( F e. ( A ^pm B ) <-> ( F : dom F --> A /\ dom F C_ B ) ) )
Theorem	elpm2r 6743	Sufficient condition for being a partial function. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) /\ ( F : C --> A /\ C C_ B ) ) -> F e. ( A ^pm B ) )
Theorem	elpmi 6744	A partial function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2015.)
|- ( F e. ( A ^pm B ) -> ( F : dom F --> A /\ dom F C_ B ) )
Theorem	pmfun 6745	A partial function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( F e. ( A ^pm B ) -> Fun F )
Theorem	elmapex 6746	Eliminate antecedent for mapping theorems: domain can be taken to be a set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( B ^m C ) -> ( B e. _V /\ C e. _V ) )
Theorem	elmapi 6747	A mapping is a function, forward direction only with superfluous antecedent removed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( B ^m C ) -> A : C --> B )
Theorem	elmapfn 6748	A mapping is a function with the appropriate domain. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)
|- ( A e. ( B ^m C ) -> A Fn C )
Theorem	elmapfun 6749	A mapping is always a function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
|- ( A e. ( B ^m C ) -> Fun A )
Theorem	elmapssres 6750	A restricted mapping is a mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. ( B ^m C ) /\ D C_ C ) -> ( A |` D ) e. ( B ^m D ) )
Theorem	fpmg 6751	A total function is a partial function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A --> B ) -> F e. ( B ^pm A ) )
Theorem	pmss12g 6752	Subset relation for the set of partial functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ C /\ B C_ D ) /\ ( C e. V /\ D e. W ) ) -> ( A ^pm B ) C_ ( C ^pm D ) )
Theorem	pmresg 6753	Elementhood of a restricted function in the set of partial functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ( B e. V /\ F e. ( A ^pm C ) ) -> ( F |` B ) e. ( A ^pm B ) )
Theorem	elmap 6754	Membership relation for set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( F e. ( A ^m B ) <-> F : B --> A )
Theorem	mapval2 6755*	Alternate expression for the value of set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2007.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ^m B ) = ( ~P ( B X. A ) i^i { f | f Fn B } )
Theorem	elpm 6756	The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2013.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( F e. ( A ^pm B ) <-> ( Fun F /\ F C_ ( B X. A ) ) )
Theorem	elpm2 6757	The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( F e. ( A ^pm B ) <-> ( F : dom F --> A /\ dom F C_ B ) )
Theorem	fpm 6758	A total function is a partial function. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A --> B -> F e. ( B ^pm A ) )
Theorem	mapsspm 6759	Set exponentiation is a subset of partial maps. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2016.)
|- ( A ^m B ) C_ ( A ^pm B )
Theorem	pmsspw 6760	Partial maps are a subset of the power set of the Cartesian product of its arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
|- ( A ^pm B ) C_ ~P ( B X. A )
Theorem	mapsspw 6761	Set exponentiation is a subset of the power set of the Cartesian product of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ^m B ) C_ ~P ( B X. A )
Theorem	fvmptmap 6762*	Special case of fvmpt 5650 for operator theorems. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2007.)
|- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   &    |- R e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> B = C )   &    |- F = ( x e. ( R ^m D ) |-> B )   =>    |- ( A : D --> R -> ( F ` A ) = C )
Theorem	map0e 6763	Set exponentiation with an empty exponent (ordinal number 0) is ordinal number 1. Exercise 4.42(a) of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A ^m (/) ) = 1o )
Theorem	map0b 6764	Set exponentiation with an empty base is the empty set, provided the exponent is nonempty. Theorem 96 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A =/= (/) -> ( (/) ^m A ) = (/) )
Theorem	map0g 6765	Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( ( A ^m B ) = (/) <-> ( A = (/) /\ B =/= (/) ) ) )
Theorem	map0 6766	Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A ^m B ) = (/) <-> ( A = (/) /\ B =/= (/) ) )
Theorem	mapsn 6767*	The value of set exponentiation with a singleton exponent. Theorem 98 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ^m { B } ) = { f | E. y e. A f = { <. B , y >. } }
Theorem	mapss 6768	Subset inheritance for set exponentiation. Theorem 99 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( B e. V /\ A C_ B ) -> ( A ^m C ) C_ ( B ^m C ) )
Theorem	fdiagfn 6769*	Functionality of the diagonal map. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. B |-> ( I X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( ( B e. V /\ I e. W ) -> F : B --> ( B ^m I ) )
Theorem	fvdiagfn 6770*	Functionality of the diagonal map. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. B |-> ( I X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( ( I e. W /\ X e. B ) -> ( F ` X ) = ( I X. { X } ) )
Theorem	mapsnconst 6771	Every singleton map is a constant function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Mar-2015.)
|- S = { X }   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- X e. _V   =>    |- ( F e. ( B ^m S ) -> F = ( S X. { ( F ` X ) } ) )
Theorem	mapsncnv 6772*	Expression for the inverse of the canonical map between a set and its set of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
|- S = { X }   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- X e. _V   &    |- F = ( x e. ( B ^m S ) |-> ( x ` X ) )   =>    |- `' F = ( y e. B |-> ( S X. { y } ) )
Theorem	mapsnf1o2 6773*	Explicit bijection between a set and its singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
|- S = { X }   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- X e. _V   &    |- F = ( x e. ( B ^m S ) |-> ( x ` X ) )   =>    |- F : ( B ^m S ) -1-1-onto-> B
Theorem	mapsnf1o3 6774*	Explicit bijection in the reverse of mapsnf1o2 6773. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Mar-2015.)
|- S = { X }   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- X e. _V   &    |- F = ( y e. B |-> ( S X. { y } ) )   =>    |- F : B -1-1-onto-> ( B ^m S )
2.6.27  Infinite Cartesian products
Syntax	cixp 6775	Extend class notation to include infinite Cartesian products.
class X_ x e. A B
Definition	df-ixp 6776*	Definition of infinite Cartesian product of [Enderton] p. 54. Enderton uses a bold "X" with x e. A written underneath or as a subscript, as does Stoll p. 47. Some books use a capital pi, but we will reserve that notation for products of numbers. Usually B represents a class expression containing x free and thus can be thought of as B ( x ). Normally, x is not free in A, although this is not a requirement of the definition. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- X_ x e. A B = { f | ( f Fn { x | x e. A } /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. B ) }
Theorem	dfixp 6777*	Eliminate the expression { x | x e. A } in df-ixp 6776, under the assumption that A and x are disjoint. This way, we can say that x is bound in X_ x e. A B even if it appears free in A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
|- X_ x e. A B = { f | ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. B ) }
Theorem	ixpsnval 6778*	The value of an infinite Cartesian product with a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2018.)
|- ( X e. V -> X_ x e. { X } B = { f | ( f Fn { X } /\ ( f ` X ) e. [_ X / x ]_ B ) } )
Theorem	elixp2 6779*	Membership in an infinite Cartesian product. See df-ixp 6776 for discussion of the notation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- ( F e. X_ x e. A B <-> ( F e. _V /\ F Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( F ` x ) e. B ) )
Theorem	fvixp 6780*	Projection of a factor of an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( x = C -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ( F e. X_ x e. A B /\ C e. A ) -> ( F ` C ) e. D )
Theorem	ixpfn 6781*	A nuple is a function. (Contributed by FL, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
|- ( F e. X_ x e. A B -> F Fn A )
Theorem	elixp 6782*	Membership in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- F e. _V   =>    |- ( F e. X_ x e. A B <-> ( F Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( F ` x ) e. B ) )
Theorem	elixpconst 6783*	Membership in an infinite Cartesian product of a constant B. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2008.)
|- F e. _V   =>    |- ( F e. X_ x e. A B <-> F : A --> B )
Theorem	ixpconstg 6784*	Infinite Cartesian product of a constant B. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> X_ x e. A B = ( B ^m A ) )
Theorem	ixpconst 6785*	Infinite Cartesian product of a constant B. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = ( B ^m A )
Theorem	ixpeq1 6786*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A = B -> X_ x e. A C = X_ x e. B C )
Theorem	ixpeq1d 6787*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> X_ x e. A C = X_ x e. B C )
Theorem	ss2ixp 6788	Subclass theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
|- ( A. x e. A B C_ C -> X_ x e. A B C_ X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpeq2 6789	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A. x e. A B = C -> X_ x e. A B = X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpeq2dva 6790*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> X_ x e. A B = X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpeq2dv 6791*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> X_ x e. A B = X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	cbvixp 6792*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
|- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ x C   &    |- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = X_ y e. A C
Theorem	cbvixpv 6793*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = X_ y e. A C
Theorem	nfixpxy 6794*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ y B   =>    |- F/_ y X_ x e. A B
Theorem	nfixp1 6795	The index variable in an indexed Cartesian product is not free. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x X_ x e. A B
Theorem	ixpprc 6796*	A cartesian product of proper-class many sets is empty, because any function in the cartesian product has to be a set with domain A, which is not possible for a proper class domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> X_ x e. A B = (/) )
Theorem	ixpf 6797*	A member of an infinite Cartesian product maps to the indexed union of the product argument. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- ( F e. X_ x e. A B -> F : A --> U_ x e. A B )
Theorem	uniixp 6798*	The union of an infinite Cartesian product is included in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- U. X_ x e. A B C_ ( A X. U_ x e. A B )
Theorem	ixpexgg 6799*	The existence of an infinite Cartesian product. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. Remark in Enderton p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. W /\ A. x e. A B e. V ) -> X_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	ixpin 6800*	The intersection of two infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- X_ x e. A ( B i^i C ) = ( X_ x e. A B i^i X_ x e. A C )