P. 71 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7001-7100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	xpsneng 7001	A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton. Proposition 4.22(c) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A X. { B } ) ~~ A )
Theorem	xp1en 7002	One times a cardinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A X. 1o ) ~~ A )
Theorem	endisj 7003*	Any two sets are equinumerous to disjoint sets. Exercise 4.39 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- E. x E. y ( ( x ~~ A /\ y ~~ B ) /\ ( x i^i y ) = (/) )
Theorem	xpcomf1o 7004*	The canonical bijection from ( A X. B ) to ( B X. A ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. ( A X. B ) |-> U. `' { x } )   =>    |- F : ( A X. B ) -1-1-onto-> ( B X. A )
Theorem	xpcomco 7005*	Composition with the bijection of xpcomf1o 7004 swaps the arguments to a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. ( A X. B ) |-> U. `' { x } )   &    |- G = ( y e. B , z e. A |-> C )   =>    |- ( G o. F ) = ( z e. A , y e. B |-> C )
Theorem	xpcomen 7006	Commutative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(d) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A X. B ) ~~ ( B X. A )
Theorem	xpcomeng 7007	Commutative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(d) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A X. B ) ~~ ( B X. A ) )
Theorem	xpsnen2g 7008	A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton on the left. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( { A } X. B ) ~~ B )
Theorem	xpassen 7009	Associative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(e) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A X. B ) X. C ) ~~ ( A X. ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	xpdom2 7010	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Proposition 10.33(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B -> ( C X. A ) ~<_ ( C X. B ) )
Theorem	xpdom2g 7011	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( C e. V /\ A ~<_ B ) -> ( C X. A ) ~<_ ( C X. B ) )
Theorem	xpdom1g 7012	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( C e. V /\ A ~<_ B ) -> ( A X. C ) ~<_ ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	xpdom3m 7013*	A set is dominated by its Cartesian product with an inhabited set. Exercise 6 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Apr-2020.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ E. x x e. B ) -> A ~<_ ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	xpdom1 7014	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by NM, 29-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
|- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B -> ( A X. C ) ~<_ ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	pw2f1odclem 7015*	Lemma for pw2f1odc 7016. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> B =/= C )   &    |- ( ph -> A. p e. A A. q e. ~P ADECID p e. q )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( S e. ~P A /\ G = ( z e. A |-> if ( z e. S , C , B ) ) ) <-> ( G e. ( { B , C } ^m A ) /\ S = ( `' G " { C } ) ) ) )
Theorem	pw2f1odc 7016*	The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with an unordered pair base of ordinal 2. Generalized from Proposition 10.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> B =/= C )   &    |- ( ph -> A. p e. A A. q e. ~P ADECID p e. q )   &    |- F = ( x e. ~P A |-> ( z e. A |-> if ( z e. x , C , B ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> F : ~P A -1-1-onto-> ( { B , C } ^m A ) )
Theorem	fopwdom 7017	Covering implies injection on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. _V /\ F : A -onto-> B ) -> ~P B ~<_ ~P A )
Theorem	0domg 7018	Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> (/) ~<_ A )
Theorem	dom0 7019	A set dominated by the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2004.)
|- ( A ~<_ (/) <-> A = (/) )
Theorem	0dom 7020	Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- (/) ~<_ A
Theorem	enen1 7021	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A ~~ C <-> B ~~ C ) )
Theorem	enen2 7022	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( C ~~ A <-> C ~~ B ) )
Theorem	domen1 7023	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A ~<_ C <-> B ~<_ C ) )
Theorem	domen2 7024	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( C ~<_ A <-> C ~<_ B ) )
2.6.29  Equinumerosity (cont.)
Theorem	xpf1o 7025*	Construct a bijection on a Cartesian product given bijections on the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> X ) : A -1-1-onto-> B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. C |-> Y ) : C -1-1-onto-> D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A , y e. C |-> <. X , Y >. ) : ( A X. C ) -1-1-onto-> ( B X. D ) )
Theorem	xpen 7026	Equinumerosity law for Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(b) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D ) -> ( A X. C ) ~~ ( B X. D ) )
Theorem	mapen 7027	Two set exponentiations are equinumerous when their bases and exponents are equinumerous. Theorem 6H(c) of [Enderton] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D ) -> ( A ^m C ) ~~ ( B ^m D ) )
Theorem	mapdom1g 7028	Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ B /\ C e. V ) -> ( A ^m C ) ~<_ ( B ^m C ) )
Theorem	mapxpen 7029	Equinumerosity law for double set exponentiation. Proposition 10.45 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( ( A ^m B ) ^m C ) ~~ ( A ^m ( B X. C ) ) )
Theorem	xpmapenlem 7030*	Lemma for xpmapen 7031. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D = ( z e. C |-> ( 1st ` ( x ` z ) ) )   &    |- R = ( z e. C |-> ( 2nd ` ( x ` z ) ) )   &    |- S = ( z e. C |-> <. ( ( 1st ` y ) ` z ) , ( ( 2nd ` y ) ` z ) >. )   =>    |- ( ( A X. B ) ^m C ) ~~ ( ( A ^m C ) X. ( B ^m C ) )
Theorem	xpmapen 7031	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a Cartesian product. Exercise 4.47 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A X. B ) ^m C ) ~~ ( ( A ^m C ) X. ( B ^m C ) )
Theorem	ssenen 7032*	Equinumerosity of equinumerous subsets of a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> { x | ( x C_ A /\ x ~~ C ) } ~~ { x | ( x C_ B /\ x ~~ C ) } )
2.6.30  Pigeonhole Principle
Theorem	phplem1 7033	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. If we join a natural number to itself minus an element, we end up with its successor minus the same element. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. A ) -> ( { A } u. ( A \ { B } ) ) = ( suc A \ { B } ) )
Theorem	phplem2 7034	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus one of its elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )
Theorem	phplem3 7035	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. For a version without the redundant hypotheses, see phplem3g 7037. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )
Theorem	phplem4 7036	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A ~~ suc B -> A ~~ B ) )
Theorem	phplem3g 7037	A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. Version of phplem3 7035 with unnecessary hypotheses removed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )
Theorem	nneneq 7038	Two equinumerous natural numbers are equal. Proposition 10.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. Also compare Corollary 6E of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( A ~~ B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	php5 7039	A natural number is not equinumerous to its successor. Corollary 10.21(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
|- ( A e. om -> -. A ~~ suc A )
Theorem	snnen2og 7040	A singleton { A } is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If A is a proper class, see snnen2oprc 7041. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. V -> -. { A } ~~ 2o )
Theorem	snnen2oprc 7041	A singleton { A } is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If A is a set, see snnen2og 7040. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> -. { A } ~~ 2o )
Theorem	1nen2 7042	One and two are not equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jan-2022.)
|- -. 1o ~~ 2o
Theorem	phplem4dom 7043	Dominance of successors implies dominance of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A ~<_ suc B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	php5dom 7044	A natural number does not dominate its successor. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. om -> -. suc A ~<_ A )
Theorem	nndomo 7045	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( A ~<_ B <-> A C_ B ) )
Theorem	1ndom2 7046	Two is not dominated by one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
|- -. 2o ~<_ 1o
Theorem	phpm 7047*	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. By "proper subset" here we mean that there is an element which is in the natural number and not in the subset, or in symbols E. x x e. ( A \ B ) (which is stronger than not being equal in the absence of excluded middle). Theorem (Pigeonhole Principle) of [Enderton] p. 134. The theorem is so-called because you can't put n + 1 pigeons into n holes (if each hole holds only one pigeon). The proof consists of lemmas phplem1 7033 through phplem4 7036, nneneq 7038, and this final piece of the proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B C_ A /\ E. x x e. ( A \ B ) ) -> -. A ~~ B )
Theorem	phpelm 7048	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to an element of itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. A ) -> -. A ~~ B )
Theorem	phplem4on 7049	Equinumerosity of successors of an ordinal and a natural number implies equinumerosity of the originals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A ~~ suc B -> A ~~ B ) )
2.6.31  Finite sets
Theorem	fict 7050	A finite set is dominated by om. Also see finct 7306. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2018.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> A ~<_ om )
Theorem	fidceq 7051	Equality of members of a finite set is decidable. This may be counterintuitive: cannot any two sets be elements of a finite set? Well, to show, for example, that { B , C } is finite would require showing it is equinumerous to 1o or to 2o but to show that you'd need to know B = C or -. B = C, respectively. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> DECID B = C )
Theorem	fidifsnen 7052	All decrements of a finite set are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( X e. Fin /\ A e. X /\ B e. X ) -> ( X \ { A } ) ~~ ( X \ { B } ) )
Theorem	fidifsnid 7053	If we remove a single element from a finite set then put it back in, we end up with the original finite set. This strengthens difsnss 3817 from subset to equality when the set is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. A ) -> ( ( A \ { B } ) u. { B } ) = A )
Theorem	nnfi 7054	Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
|- ( A e. om -> A e. Fin )
Theorem	enfi 7055	Equinumerous sets have the same finiteness. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Fin <-> B e. Fin ) )
Theorem	enfii 7056	A set equinumerous to a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
|- ( ( B e. Fin /\ A ~~ B ) -> A e. Fin )
Theorem	ssfilem 7057*	Lemma for ssfiexmid 7058. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
|- { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. Fin   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	ssfiexmid 7058*	If any subset of a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. One direction of Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.)
|- A. x A. y ( ( x e. Fin /\ y C_ x ) -> y e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	infiexmid 7059*	If the intersection of any finite set and any other set is finite, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.)
|- ( x e. Fin -> ( x i^i y ) e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	domfiexmid 7060*	If any set dominated by a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.)
|- ( ( x e. Fin /\ y ~<_ x ) -> y e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	dif1en 7061	If a set A is equinumerous to the successor of a natural number M, then A with an element removed is equinumerous to M. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( M e. om /\ A ~~ suc M /\ X e. A ) -> ( A \ { X } ) ~~ M )
Theorem	dif1enen 7062	Subtracting one element from each of two equinumerous finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A \ { C } ) ~~ ( B \ { D } ) )
Theorem	fiunsnnn 7063	Adding one element to a finite set which is equinumerous to a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. ( _V \ A ) ) /\ ( N e. om /\ A ~~ N ) ) -> ( A u. { B } ) ~~ suc N )
Theorem	php5fin 7064	A finite set is not equinumerous to a set which adds one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. ( _V \ A ) ) -> -. A ~~ ( A u. { B } ) )
Theorem	fisbth 7065	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin ) /\ ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~<_ A ) ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	0fi 7066	The empty set is finite. (Contributed by FL, 14-Jul-2008.)
|- (/) e. Fin
Theorem	fin0 7067*	A nonempty finite set has at least one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> ( A =/= (/) <-> E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	fin0or 7068*	A finite set is either empty or inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> ( A = (/) \/ E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	diffitest 7069*	If subtracting any set from a finite set gives a finite set, any proposition of the form -. ph is decidable. This is not a proof of full excluded middle, but it is close enough to show we won't be able to prove A e. Fin -> ( A \ B ) e. Fin. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- A. a e. Fin A. b ( a \ b ) e. Fin   =>    |- ( -. ph \/ -. -. ph )
Theorem	findcard 7070*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on the given set with any one element removed. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y \ { z } ) -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. Fin -> ( A. z e. y ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. Fin -> ta )
Theorem	findcard2 7071*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive step shows that the result is true if one more element is added to the set. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jul-2010.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y u. { z } ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. Fin -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. Fin -> ta )
Theorem	findcard2s 7072*	Variation of findcard2 7071 requiring that the element added in the induction step not be a member of the original set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y u. { z } ) -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( ( y e. Fin /\ -. z e. y ) -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. Fin -> ta )
Theorem	findcard2d 7073*	Deduction version of findcard2 7071. If you also need y e. Fin (which doesn't come for free due to ssfiexmid 7058), use findcard2sd 7074 instead. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y u. { z } ) -> ( ps <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> et ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ch )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( y C_ A /\ z e. ( A \ y ) ) ) -> ( th -> ta ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> et )
Theorem	findcard2sd 7074*	Deduction form of finite set induction . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Sep-2021.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = ( y u. { z } ) -> ( ps <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> et ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ch )   &    |- ( ( ( ph /\ y e. Fin ) /\ ( y C_ A /\ z e. ( A \ y ) ) ) -> ( th -> ta ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> et )
Theorem	diffisn 7075	Subtracting a singleton from a finite set produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. A ) -> ( A \ { B } ) e. Fin )
Theorem	diffifi 7076	Subtracting one finite set from another produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin /\ B C_ A ) -> ( A \ B ) e. Fin )
Theorem	infnfi 7077	An infinite set is not finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2022.)
|- ( om ~<_ A -> -. A e. Fin )
Theorem	ominf 7078	The set of natural numbers is not finite. Although we supply this theorem because we can, the more natural way to express " om is infinite" is om ~<_ om which is an instance of domrefg 6935. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.)
|- -. om e. Fin
Theorem	isinfinf 7079*	An infinite set contains subsets of arbitrarily large finite cardinality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2022.)
|- ( om ~<_ A -> A. n e. om E. x ( x C_ A /\ x ~~ n ) )
Theorem	ac6sfi 7080*	Existence of a choice function for finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 26-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
|- ( y = ( f ` x ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A E. y e. B ph ) -> E. f ( f : A --> B /\ A. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	fidcen 7081	Equinumerosity of finite sets is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2026.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin ) -> DECID A ~~ B )
Theorem	tridc 7082*	A trichotomous order is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.)
|- ( ph -> R Po A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y \/ x = y \/ y R x ) )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID B R C )
Theorem	fimax2gtrilemstep 7083*	Lemma for fimax2gtri 7084. The induction step. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.)
|- ( ph -> R Po A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y \/ x = y \/ y R x ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= (/) )   &    |- ( ph -> U e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> U C_ A )   &    |- ( ph -> Z e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> V e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> -. V e. U )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. U -. Z R y )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A A. y e. ( U u. { V } ) -. x R y )
Theorem	fimax2gtri 7084*	A finite set has a maximum under a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.)
|- ( ph -> R Po A )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x R y \/ x = y \/ y R x ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= (/) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A A. y e. A -. x R y )
Theorem	finexdc 7085*	Decidability of existence, over a finite set and defined by a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A DECID ph ) -> DECID E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	dfrex2fin 7086*	Relationship between universal and existential quantifiers over a finite set. Remark in Section 2.2.1 of [Pierik], p. 8. Although Pierik does not mention the decidability condition explicitly, it does say "only finitely many x to check" which means there must be some way of checking each value of x. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A DECID ph ) -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> -. A. x e. A -. ph ) )
Theorem	elssdc 7087*	Membership in a finite subset of a set with decidable equality is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Feb-2026.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. B A. y e. B DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID X e. A )
Theorem	eqsndc 7088*	Decidability of equality between a finite subset of a set with decidable equality, and a singleton whose element is an element of the larger set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2026.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. B A. y e. B DECID x = y )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID A = { X } )
Theorem	infm 7089*	An infinite set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2022.)
|- ( om ~<_ A -> E. x x e. A )
Theorem	infn0 7090	An infinite set is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.)
|- ( om ~<_ A -> A =/= (/) )
Theorem	inffiexmid 7091*	If any given set is either finite or infinite, excluded middle follows. For another example, ~P 1o is not infinite, by pw1ninf 16526, but also cannot be shown to be finite by pw1fin 7095. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2022.)
|- ( x e. Fin \/ om ~<_ x )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	en2eqpr 7092	Building a set with two elements. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( C ~~ 2o /\ A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A =/= B -> C = { A , B } ) )
Theorem	exmidpw 7093	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o having two elements. Remark of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> ~P 1o ~~ 2o )
Theorem	exmidpweq 7094	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> ~P 1o = 2o )
Theorem	pw1fin 7095	Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being finite. (Contributed by SN and Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> ~P 1o e. Fin )
Theorem	pw1dc0el 7096	Another equivalent of excluded middle, which is a mere reformulation of the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1oDECID (/) e. x )
Theorem	exmidpw2en 7097	The power set of a set being equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2o is equivalent to excluded middle. This is Metamath 100 proof #52. The forward direction uses excluded middle expressed as EXMID to show this equinumerosity. The reverse direction is the one which establishes that power set being equinumerous to set exponentiation implies excluded middle. This resolves the question of whether we will be able to prove this equinumerosity theorem in the negative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x ~P x ~~ ( 2o ^m x ) )
Theorem	ss1o0el1o 7098	Reformulation of ss1o0el1 4285 using 1o instead of { (/) }. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A C_ 1o -> ( (/) e. A <-> A = 1o ) )
Theorem	pw1dc1 7099	If, in the set of truth values (the powerset of 1o), equality to 1o is decidable, then excluded middle holds (and conversely). (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1oDECID x = 1o )
Theorem	fientri3 7100	Trichotomy of dominance for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ B e. Fin ) -> ( A ~<_ B \/ B ~<_ A ) )