P. 168 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 16701-16800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bj-sels 16701*	If a class is a set, then it is a member of a set. (Copied from set.mm.) (Contributed by BJ, 3-Apr-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> E. x A e. x )
Theorem	bj-axun2 16702*	axun2 4558 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- E. y A. z ( z e. y <-> E. w ( z e. w /\ w e. x ) )
Theorem	bj-uniex2 16703*	uniex2 4559 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- E. y y = U. x
Theorem	bj-uniex 16704	uniex 4560 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- U. A e. _V
Theorem	bj-uniexg 16705	uniexg 4562 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> U. A e. _V )
Theorem	bj-unex 16706	unex 4564 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A u. B ) e. _V
Theorem	bdunexb 16707	Bounded version of unexb 4565. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- BOUNDED B   =>    |- ( ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) <-> ( A u. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	bj-unexg 16708	unexg 4566 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A u. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	bj-sucexg 16709	sucexg 4622 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> suc A e. _V )
Theorem	bj-sucex 16710	sucex 4623 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- suc A e. _V
14.3.9.1  Delta_0-classical logic
Axiom	ax-bj-d0cl 16711	Axiom for Δ0-classical logic. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Jan-2020.) New usage is discouraged since this statement is not intuitionnistic. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- DECID ph
Theorem	bj-d0clsepcl 16712	Δ0-classical logic and separation implies classical logic. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Jan-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) New usage is discouraged since this statement is not intuitionnistic. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- DECID ph
14.3.9.2  Inductive classes and the class of natural number ordinals
Syntax	wind 16713	Syntax for inductive classes.
wff Ind A
Definition	df-bj-ind 16714*	Define the property of being an inductive class. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- (Ind A <-> ( (/) e. A /\ A. x e. A suc x e. A ) )
Theorem	bj-indsuc 16715	A direct consequence of the definition of Ind. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- (Ind A -> ( B e. A -> suc B e. A ) )
Theorem	bj-indeq 16716	Equality property for Ind. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- ( A = B -> (Ind A <-> Ind B ) )
Theorem	bj-bdind 16717	Boundedness of the formula "the setvar x is an inductive class". (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED Ind x
Theorem	bj-indint 16718*	The property of being an inductive class is closed under intersections. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- Ind |^| { x e. A | Ind x }
Theorem	bj-indind 16719*	If A is inductive and B is "inductive in A " (a condition weaker than "inductive"), then ( A i^i B ) is inductive. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Oct-2020.)
|- ( (Ind A /\ ( (/) e. B /\ A. x e. A ( x e. B -> suc x e. B ) ) ) -> Ind ( A i^i B ) )
Theorem	bj-dfom 16720	Alternate definition of om, as the intersection of all the inductive sets. Proposal: make this the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- om = |^| { x | Ind x }
Theorem	bj-omind 16721	om is an inductive class. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- Ind om
Theorem	bj-omssind 16722	om is included in all the inductive sets (but for the moment, we cannot prove that it is included in all the inductive classes). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> (Ind A -> om C_ A ) )
Theorem	bj-ssom 16723*	A characterization of subclasses of om. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x (Ind x -> A C_ x ) <-> A C_ om )
Theorem	bj-om 16724*	A set is equal to om if and only if it is the smallest inductive set. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = om <-> (Ind A /\ A. x (Ind x -> A C_ x ) ) ) )
Theorem	bj-2inf 16725*	Two formulations of the axiom of infinity (see ax-infvn 16728 and bj-omex 16729) . (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( om e. _V <-> E. x (Ind x /\ A. y (Ind y -> x C_ y ) ) )
14.3.9.3  The first three Peano postulates The first three Peano postulates follow from constructive set theory (actually, from its core axioms). The proofs peano1 4718 and peano3 4720 already show this. In this section, we prove bj-peano2 16726 to complete this program. We also prove a preliminary version of the fifth Peano postulate from the core axioms.
Theorem	bj-peano2 16726	Constructive proof of peano2 4719. Temporary note: another possibility is to simply replace sucexg 4622 with bj-sucexg 16709 in the proof of peano2 4719. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> suc A e. om )
Theorem	peano5set 16727*	Version of peano5 4722 when om i^i A is assumed to be a set, allowing a proof from the core axioms of CZF. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( om i^i A ) e. V -> ( ( (/) e. A /\ A. x e. om ( x e. A -> suc x e. A ) ) -> om C_ A ) )
14.3.10  CZF: Infinity In the absence of full separation, the axiom of infinity has to be stated more precisely, as the existence of the smallest class containing the empty set and the successor of each of its elements.
14.3.10.1  The set of natural number ordinals In this section, we introduce the axiom of infinity in a constructive setting (ax-infvn 16728) and deduce that the class om of natural number ordinals is a set (bj-omex 16729).
Axiom	ax-infvn 16728*	Axiom of infinity in a constructive setting. This asserts the existence of the special set we want (the set of natural numbers), instead of the existence of a set with some properties (ax-iinf 4712) from which one then proves, using full separation, that the wanted set exists (omex 4717). "vn" is for "von Neumann". (Contributed by BJ, 14-Nov-2019.)
|- E. x (Ind x /\ A. y (Ind y -> x C_ y ) )
Theorem	bj-omex 16729	Proof of omex 4717 from ax-infvn 16728. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- om e. _V
14.3.10.2  Peano's fifth postulate In this section, we give constructive proofs of two versions of Peano's fifth postulate.
Theorem	bdpeano5 16730*	Bounded version of peano5 4722. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( ( (/) e. A /\ A. x e. om ( x e. A -> suc x e. A ) ) -> om C_ A )
Theorem	speano5 16731*	Version of peano5 4722 when A is assumed to be a set, allowing a proof from the core axioms of CZF. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ (/) e. A /\ A. x e. om ( x e. A -> suc x e. A ) ) -> om C_ A )
14.3.10.3  Bounded induction and Peano's fourth postulate In this section, we prove various versions of bounded induction from the basic axioms of CZF (in particular, without the axiom of set induction). We also prove Peano's fourth postulate. Together with the results from the previous sections, this proves from the core axioms of CZF (with infinity) that the set of natural number ordinals satisfies the five Peano postulates and thus provides a model for the set of natural numbers.
Theorem	findset 16732*	Bounded induction (principle of induction when A is assumed to be a set) allowing a proof from basic constructive axioms. See find 4723 for a nonconstructive proof of the general case. See bdfind 16733 for a proof when A is assumed to be bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( ( A C_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A. x e. A suc x e. A ) -> A = om ) )
Theorem	bdfind 16733*	Bounded induction (principle of induction when A is assumed to be bounded), proved from basic constructive axioms. See find 4723 for a nonconstructive proof of the general case. See findset 16732 for a proof when A is assumed to be a set. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( ( A C_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A. x e. A suc x e. A ) -> A = om )
Theorem	bj-bdfindis 16734*	Bounded induction (principle of induction for bounded formulas), using implicit substitutions (the biconditional versions of the hypotheses are implicit substitutions, and we have weakened them to implications). Constructive proof (from CZF). See finds 4724 for a proof of full induction in IZF. From this version, it is easy to prove bounded versions of finds 4724, finds2 4725, finds1 4726. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ x th   &    |- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )
Theorem	bj-bdfindisg 16735*	Version of bj-bdfindis 16734 using a class term in the consequent. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-bdfindis 16734 for explanations. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ x th   &    |- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )   &    |- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ta   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ta ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> ( A e. om -> ta ) )
Theorem	bj-bdfindes 16736	Bounded induction (principle of induction for bounded formulas), using explicit substitutions. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-bdfindis 16734 for explanations. From this version, it is easy to prove the bounded version of findes 4727. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- ( ( [. (/) / x ]. ph /\ A. x e. om ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )
Theorem	bj-nn0suc0 16737*	Constructive proof of a variant of nn0suc 4728. For a constructive proof of nn0suc 4728, see bj-nn0suc 16751. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( A = (/) \/ E. x e. A A = suc x ) )
Theorem	bj-nntrans 16738	A natural number is a transitive set. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( B e. A -> B C_ A ) )
Theorem	bj-nntrans2 16739	A natural number is a transitive set. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> Tr A )
Theorem	bj-nnelirr 16740	A natural number does not belong to itself. Version of elirr 4665 for natural numbers, which does not require ax-setind 4661. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> -. A e. A )
Theorem	bj-nnen2lp 16741	A version of en2lp 4678 for natural numbers, which does not require ax-setind 4661. Note: using this theorem and bj-nnelirr 16740, one can remove dependency on ax-setind 4661 from nntri2 6729 and nndcel 6735; one can actually remove more dependencies from these. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> -. ( A e. B /\ B e. A ) )
Theorem	bj-peano4 16742	Remove from peano4 4721 dependency on ax-setind 4661. Therefore, it only requires core constructive axioms (albeit more of them). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A = suc B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	bj-omtrans 16743	The set om is transitive. A natural number is included in om. Constructive proof of elomssom 4729. The idea is to use bounded induction with the formula x C_ om. This formula, in a logic with terms, is bounded. So in our logic without terms, we need to temporarily replace it with x C_ a and then deduce the original claim. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> A C_ om )
Theorem	bj-omtrans2 16744	The set om is transitive. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- Tr om
Theorem	bj-nnord 16745	A natural number is an ordinal class. Constructive proof of nnord 4736. Can also be proved from bj-nnelon 16746 if the latter is proved from bj-omssonALT 16750. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> Ord A )
Theorem	bj-nnelon 16746	A natural number is an ordinal. Constructive proof of nnon 4734. Can also be proved from bj-omssonALT 16750. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> A e. On )
Theorem	bj-omord 16747	The set om is an ordinal class. Constructive proof of ordom 4731. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- Ord om
Theorem	bj-omelon 16748	The set om is an ordinal. Constructive proof of omelon 4733. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- om e. On
Theorem	bj-omsson 16749	Constructive proof of omsson 4737. See also bj-omssonALT 16750. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.
|- om C_ On
Theorem	bj-omssonALT 16750	Alternate proof of bj-omsson 16749. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- om C_ On
Theorem	bj-nn0suc 16751*	Proof of (biconditional form of) nn0suc 4728 from the core axioms of CZF. See also bj-nn0sucALT 16765. As a characterization of the elements of om, this could be labeled "elom". (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om <-> ( A = (/) \/ E. x e. om A = suc x ) )
14.3.11  CZF: Set induction In this section, we add the axiom of set induction to the core axioms of CZF.
14.3.11.1  Set induction In this section, we prove some variants of the axiom of set induction.
Theorem	setindft 16752*	Axiom of set-induction with a disjoint variable condition replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.)
|- ( A. x F/ y ph -> ( A. x ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) -> A. x ph ) )
Theorem	setindf 16753*	Axiom of set-induction with a disjoint variable condition replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- ( A. x ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) -> A. x ph )
Theorem	setindis 16754*	Axiom of set induction using implicit substitutions. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ y ps   &    |- ( x = z -> ( ph -> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ch -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A. y ( A. z e. y ps -> ch ) -> A. x ph )
Axiom	ax-bdsetind 16755*	Axiom of bounded set induction. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- ( A. a ( A. y e. a [ y / a ] ph -> ph ) -> A. a ph )
Theorem	bdsetindis 16756*	Axiom of bounded set induction using implicit substitutions. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ y ps   &    |- ( x = z -> ( ph -> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ch -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A. y ( A. z e. y ps -> ch ) -> A. x ph )
Theorem	bj-inf2vnlem1 16757*	Lemma for bj-inf2vn 16761. Remark: unoptimized proof (have to use more deduction style). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x ( x e. A <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) ) -> Ind A )
Theorem	bj-inf2vnlem2 16758*	Lemma for bj-inf2vnlem3 16759 and bj-inf2vnlem4 16760. Remark: unoptimized proof (have to use more deduction style). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) -> (Ind Z -> A. u ( A. t e. u ( t e. A -> t e. Z ) -> ( u e. A -> u e. Z ) ) ) )
Theorem	bj-inf2vnlem3 16759*	Lemma for bj-inf2vn 16761. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- BOUNDED Z   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) -> (Ind Z -> A C_ Z ) )
Theorem	bj-inf2vnlem4 16760*	Lemma for bj-inf2vn2 16762. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) -> (Ind Z -> A C_ Z ) )
Theorem	bj-inf2vn 16761*	A sufficient condition for om to be a set. See bj-inf2vn2 16762 for the unbounded version from full set induction. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x e. A <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) ) -> A = om ) )
Theorem	bj-inf2vn2 16762*	A sufficient condition for om to be a set; unbounded version of bj-inf2vn 16761. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x e. A <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) ) -> A = om ) )
Axiom	ax-inf2 16763*	Another axiom of infinity in a constructive setting (see ax-infvn 16728). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Nov-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- E. a A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. a x = suc y ) )
Theorem	bj-omex2 16764	Using bounded set induction and the strong axiom of infinity, om is a set, that is, we recover ax-infvn 16728 (see bj-2inf 16725 for the equivalence of the latter with bj-omex 16729). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- om e. _V
Theorem	bj-nn0sucALT 16765*	Alternate proof of bj-nn0suc 16751, also constructive but from ax-inf2 16763, hence requiring ax-bdsetind 16755. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om <-> ( A = (/) \/ E. x e. om A = suc x ) )
14.3.11.2  Full induction In this section, using the axiom of set induction, we prove full induction on the set of natural numbers.
Theorem	bj-findis 16766*	Principle of induction, using implicit substitutions (the biconditional versions of the hypotheses are implicit substitutions, and we have weakened them to implications). Constructive proof (from CZF). See bj-bdfindis 16734 for a bounded version not requiring ax-setind 4661. See finds 4724 for a proof in IZF. From this version, it is easy to prove of finds 4724, finds2 4725, finds1 4726. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ x th   &    |- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )
Theorem	bj-findisg 16767*	Version of bj-findis 16766 using a class term in the consequent. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-findis 16766 for explanations. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ x th   &    |- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )   &    |- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ta   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ta ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> ( A e. om -> ta ) )
Theorem	bj-findes 16768	Principle of induction, using explicit substitutions. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-findis 16766 for explanations. From this version, it is easy to prove findes 4727. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( [. (/) / x ]. ph /\ A. x e. om ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )
14.3.12  CZF: Strong collection In this section, we state the axiom scheme of strong collection, which is part of CZF set theory.
Axiom	ax-strcoll 16769*	Axiom scheme of strong collection. It is stated with all possible disjoint variable conditions, to show that this weak form is sufficient. The antecedent means that ph represents a multivalued function on a, or equivalently a collection of nonempty classes indexed by a, and the axiom asserts the existence of a set b which "collects" at least one element in the image of each x e. a and which is made only of such elements. That second conjunct is what makes it "strong", compared to the axiom scheme of collection ax-coll 4227. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- A. a ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )
Theorem	strcoll2 16770*	Version of ax-strcoll 16769 with one disjoint variable condition removed and without initial universal quantifier. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )
Theorem	strcollnft 16771*	Closed form of strcollnf 16772. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Oct-2019.)
|- ( A. x A. y F/ b ph -> ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) ) )
Theorem	strcollnf 16772*	Version of ax-strcoll 16769 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. Version of strcoll2 16770 with the disjoint variable condition on b , ph replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis. This proof aims to demonstrate a standard technique, but strcoll2 16770 will generally suffice: since the theorem asserts the existence of a set b, supposing that that setvar does not occur in the already defined ph is not a big constraint. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Oct-2019.)
|- F/ b ph   =>    |- ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )
Theorem	strcollnfALT 16773*	Alternate proof of strcollnf 16772, not using strcollnft 16771. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- F/ b ph   =>    |- ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )
14.3.13  CZF: Subset collection In this section, we state the axiom scheme of subset collection, which is part of CZF set theory.
Axiom	ax-sscoll 16774*	Axiom scheme of subset collection. It is stated with all possible disjoint variable conditions, to show that this weak form is sufficient. The antecedent means that ph represents a multivalued function from a to b, or equivalently a collection of nonempty subsets of b indexed by a, and the consequent asserts the existence of a subset of c which "collects" at least one element in the image of each x e. a and which is made only of such elements. The axiom asserts the existence, for any sets a , b, of a set c such that that implication holds for any value of the parameter z of ph. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- A. a A. b E. c A. z ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph -> E. d e. c ( A. x e. a E. y e. d ph /\ A. y e. d E. x e. a ph ) )
Theorem	sscoll2 16775*	Version of ax-sscoll 16774 with two disjoint variable conditions removed and without initial universal quantifiers. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- E. c A. z ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph -> E. d e. c ( A. x e. a E. y e. d ph /\ A. y e. d E. x e. a ph ) )
14.3.14  Real numbers
Axiom	ax-ddkcomp 16776	Axiom of Dedekind completeness for Dedekind real numbers: every inhabited upper-bounded located set of reals has a real upper bound. Ideally, this axiom should be "proved" as "axddkcomp" for the real numbers constructed from IZF, and then Axiom ax-ddkcomp 16776 should be used in place of construction specific results. In particular, axcaucvg 8217 should be proved from it. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Oct-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ E. x e. RR A. y e. A y < x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x < y -> ( E. z e. A x < z \/ A. z e. A z < y ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A y <_ x /\ ( ( B e. R /\ A. y e. A y <_ B ) -> x <_ B ) ) )
14.4  Mathbox for Jim Kingdon
14.4.1  Propositional and predicate logic
Theorem	nnnotnotr 16777	Double negation of double negation elimination. Suggested by an online post by Martin Escardo. Although this statement resembles nnexmid 858, it can be proved with reference only to implication and negation (that is, without use of disjunction). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Oct-2024.)
|- -. -. ( -. -. ph -> ph )
14.4.2  The sizes of sets
Theorem	ss1oel2o 16778	Any subset of ordinal one being an element of ordinal two is equivalent to excluded middle. A variation of exmid01 4313 which more directly illustrates the contrast with el2oss1o 6678. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x ( x C_ 1o -> x e. 2o ) )
Theorem	3dom 16779*	A set that dominates ordinal 3 has at least 3 different members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2026.)
|- ( 3o ~<_ A -> E. x e. A E. y e. A E. z e. A ( x =/= y /\ x =/= z /\ y =/= z ) )
Theorem	pw1ndom3lem 16780	Lemma for pw1ndom3 16781. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2026.)
|- ( ph -> X e. ~P 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> Y e. ~P 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> Z e. ~P 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> X =/= Y )   &    |- ( ph -> X =/= Z )   &    |- ( ph -> Y =/= Z )   =>    |- ( ph -> X = (/) )
Theorem	pw1ndom3 16781	The powerset of 1o does not dominate 3o. This is another way of saying that ~P 1o does not have three elements (like pwntru 4314). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen and Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2026.)
|- -. 3o ~<_ ~P 1o
Theorem	pw1ninf 16782	The powerset of 1o is not infinite. Since we cannot prove it is finite (see pw1fin 7172), this provides a concrete example of a set which we cannot show to be finite or infinite, as seen another way at inffiexmid 7168. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2026.)
|- -. om ~<_ ~P 1o
Theorem	nnti 16783	Ordering on a natural number generates a tight apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. om )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u _E v /\ -. v _E u ) ) )
Theorem	012of 16784	Mapping zero and one between NN0 and om style integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2024.)
|- G = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   =>    |- ( `' G |` { 0 , 1 } ) : { 0 , 1 } --> 2o
Theorem	2o01f 16785	Mapping zero and one between om and NN0 style integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2024.)
|- G = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   =>    |- ( G |` 2o ) : 2o --> { 0 , 1 }
Theorem	pw1map 16786*	Mapping between ( ~P 1o ^m A ) and subsets of A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2026.)
|- F = ( s e. ( ~P 1o ^m A ) |-> { z e. A | ( s ` z ) = 1o } )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> F : ( ~P 1o ^m A ) -1-1-onto-> ~P A )
Theorem	pw1mapen 16787	Equinumerosity of ( ~P 1o ^m A ) and the set of subsets of A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( ~P 1o ^m A ) ~~ ~P A )
14.4.3  The power set of a singleton
Theorem	pwtrufal 16788	A subset of the singleton { (/) } cannot be anything other than (/) or { (/) }. Removing the double negation would change the meaning, as seen at exmid01 4313. If we view a subset of a singleton as a truth value (as seen in theorems like exmidexmid 4311), then this theorem states there are no truth values other than true and false, as described in section 1.1 of [Bauer], p. 481. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2023.)
|- ( A C_ { (/) } -> -. -. ( A = (/) \/ A = { (/) } ) )
Theorem	pwle2 16789*	An exercise related to N copies of a singleton and the power set of a singleton (where the latter can also be thought of as representing truth values). Posed as an exercise by Martin Escardo online. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2023.)
|- T = U_ x e. N ( { x } X. 1o )   =>    |- ( ( N e. om /\ G : T -1-1-> ~P 1o ) -> N C_ 2o )
Theorem	pwf1oexmid 16790*	An exercise related to N copies of a singleton and the power set of a singleton (where the latter can also be thought of as representing truth values). Posed as an exercise by Martin Escardo online. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2023.)
|- T = U_ x e. N ( { x } X. 1o )   =>    |- ( ( N e. om /\ G : T -1-1-> ~P 1o ) -> ( ran G = ~P 1o <-> ( N = 2o /\ EXMID ) ) )
Theorem	subctctexmid 16791*	If every subcountable set is countable and Markov's principle holds, excluded middle follows. Proposition 2.6 of [BauerSwan], p. 14:4. The proof is taken from that paper. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ( E. s ( s C_ om /\ E. f f : s -onto-> x ) -> E. g g : om -onto-> ( x ⊔ 1o ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> om e. Markov )   =>    |- ( ph -> EXMID )
Theorem	domomsubct 16792*	A set dominated by om is subcountable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2025.)
|- ( A ~<_ om -> E. s ( s C_ om /\ E. f f : s -onto-> A ) )
Theorem	sssneq 16793*	Any two elements of a subset of a singleton are equal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-May-2024.)
|- ( A C_ { B } -> A. y e. A A. z e. A y = z )
Theorem	pw1nct 16794*	A condition which ensures that the powerset of a singleton is not countable. The antecedent here can be referred to as the uniformity principle. Based on Mastodon posts by Andrej Bauer and Rahul Chhabra. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-May-2024.)
|- ( A. r ( r C_ ( ~P 1o X. om ) -> ( A. p e. ~P 1o E. n e. om p r n -> E. m e. om A. q e. ~P 1o q r m ) ) -> -. E. f f : om -onto-> ( ~P 1o ⊔ 1o ) )
Theorem	pw1dceq 16795*	The powerset of 1o having decidable equality is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2026.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1o A. y e. ~P 1oDECID x = y )
Theorem	exmidnotnotr 16796	Excluded middle is equivalent to double negation elimination. Read an element of ~P 1o as being a truth value and x = 1o being that x is true. For a similar theorem, but expressed in terms of formulas rather than subsets of 1o, see dcfromnotnotr 1493. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2026.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1o ( -. -. x = 1o -> x = 1o ) )
Theorem	exmidcon 16797*	Excluded middle is equivalent to the form of contraposition which removes negation. Read an element of ~P 1o as being a truth value and x = 1o being that x is true. For a similar theorem, but expressed in terms of formulas rather than subsets of 1o, see dcfromcon 1494. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2026.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1o A. y e. ~P 1o ( ( -. y = 1o -> -. x = 1o ) -> ( x = 1o -> y = 1o ) ) )
Theorem	exmidpeirce 16798*	Excluded middle is equivalent to Peirce's law. Read an element of ~P 1o as being a truth value and x = 1o being that x is true. For a similar theorem, but expressed in terms of formulas rather than subsets of 1o, see dcfrompeirce 1495. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Apr-2026.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x e. ~P 1o A. y e. ~P 1o ( ( ( x = 1o -> y = 1o ) -> x = 1o ) -> x = 1o ) )
14.4.4  Omniscience of NN+oo
Theorem	0nninf 16799	The zero element of ℕ∞ (the constant sequence equal to (/)). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2022.)
|- ( om X. { (/) } ) e. ℕ∞
Theorem	nnsf 16800*	Domain and range of S. Part of Definition 3.3 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 5. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2022.)
|- S = ( p e. ℕ∞ |-> ( i e. om |-> if ( i = (/) , 1o , ( p ` U. i ) ) ) )   =>    |- S :ℕ∞ -->ℕ∞